Arkansas Legal Resource Navigator

21 U.S.C. § 1523 — Definitions

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

21 U.S.C. § 1523 — Definitions

Page 941 TITLE 21—FOOD AND DRUGS § 1523 ‘‘(E) $5,900,000,000 in mental health and develop- mental disabilities (31 percent of mental health spending). ‘‘(F) $1,500,000,000 in public safety (26 percent of public safety spending) and $400,000,000 for the state workforce. ‘‘(8) Intergovernmental cooperation and coordina- tion through national, State, and local or tribal lead- ership and partnerships are critical to facilitate the reduction of substance abuse among youth in commu- nities across the United States. ‘‘(9) Substance abuse is perceived as a much greater problem nationally than at the community level. Ac- cording to a 2001 study sponsored by The Pew Chari- table Trusts, between 1994 and 2000— ‘‘(A) there was a 43 percent increase in the per- centage of Americans who felt progress was being made in the war on drugs at the community level; ‘‘(B) only 9 percent of Americans say drug abuse is a ‘crisis’ in their neighborhood, compared to 27 percent who say this about the nation; and ‘‘(C) the percentage of those who felt we lost ground in the war on drugs on a community level fell by more than a quarter, from 51 percent in 1994 to 37 percent in 2000.’’ AUTHORIZATION FOR NATIONAL COMMUNITY ANTIDRUG COALITION INSTITUTE Pub. L. 107–82, § 4, Dec. 14, 2001, 115 Stat. 821, as amended by Pub. L. 109–469, title VIII, § 805, Dec. 29, 2006, 120 Stat. 3535; Pub. L. 115–271, title VIII, § 8204, Oct. 24, 2018, 132 Stat. 4112; Pub. L. 116–74, § 2(e), Nov. 27, 2019, 133 Stat. 1159, provided that: ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Beginning in fiscal year 2020, the Director shall make a competitive grant to provide for the continuation of the National Community Anti-drug [sic] Coalition Institute. ‘‘(b) ELIGIBLE ORGANIZATIONS.—An organization eligi- ble for the grant unde

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 21 U.S.C. § 1523

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.

Original supplied file — preserved unchanged

Download original Markdown file

File SHA-256: 663da0586149291247d87de5e12619532ff46011a3399e4108bd12d322b3b258. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.

Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.

Open the recorded source website ↗

Record provenance

Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-d146cd6b372b6638ea80bf72
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-21/section-1523-definitions--e4f103f3cc.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: eb17643a595c5b24e9ccaab2b44c1f5651ef9729e194ee4a561a6fc1d45950e5

Source location: USCODE-2024-title21-chap20-subchapII-sec1523.pdf

Stored source content

Page 941 TITLE 21—FOOD AND DRUGS § 1523 ‘‘(E) $5,900,000,000 in mental health and develop- mental disabilities (31 percent of mental health spending). ‘‘(F) $1,500,000,000 in public safety (26 percent of public safety spending) and $400,000,000 for the state workforce. ‘‘(8) Intergovernmental cooperation and coordina- tion through national, State, and local or tribal lead- ership and partnerships are critical to facilitate the reduction of substance abuse among youth in commu- nities across the United States. ‘‘(9) Substance abuse is perceived as a much greater problem nationally than at the community level. Ac- cording to a 2001 study sponsored by The Pew Chari- table Trusts, between 1994 and 2000— ‘‘(A) there was a 43 percent increase in the per- centage of Americans who felt progress was being made in the war on drugs at the community level; ‘‘(B) only 9 percent of Americans say drug abuse is a ‘crisis’ in their neighborhood, compared to 27 percent who say this about the nation; and ‘‘(C) the percentage of those who felt we lost ground in the war on drugs on a community level fell by more than a quarter, from 51 percent in 1994 to 37 percent in 2000.’’ AUTHORIZATION FOR NATIONAL COMMUNITY ANTIDRUG COALITION INSTITUTE Pub. L. 107–82, § 4, Dec. 14, 2001, 115 Stat. 821, as amended by Pub. L. 109–469, title VIII, § 805, Dec. 29, 2006, 120 Stat. 3535; Pub. L. 115–271, title VIII, § 8204, Oct. 24, 2018, 132 Stat. 4112; Pub. L. 116–74, § 2(e), Nov. 27, 2019, 133 Stat. 1159, provided that: ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Beginning in fiscal year 2020, the Director shall make a competitive grant to provide for the continuation of the National Community Anti-drug [sic] Coalition Institute. ‘‘(b) ELIGIBLE ORGANIZATIONS.—An organization eligi- ble for the grant under subsection (a) is any national nonprofit organization that represents, provides tech- nical assistance and training to, and has special exper- tise and broad, national-level experience in community antidrug coalitions under this subchapter [sic, probably means chapter 2 of the National Narcotics Leadership Act of 1988 (21 U.S.C. 1521 et seq.)]. ‘‘(c) USE OF GRANT AMOUNT.—The organization that receives the grant under subsection (a) shall continue a National Community Anti-Drug [sic] Coalition Insti- tute to— ‘‘(1) provide education, training, and technical as- sistance for coalition leaders and community teams, with emphasis on the development of coalitions serv- ing economically disadvantaged areas; ‘‘(2) develop and disseminate evaluation tools, mechanisms, and measures to better assess and docu- ment coalition performance measures and outcomes; and ‘‘(3) bridge the gap between research and practice by translating knowledge from research into prac- tical information. ‘‘(d) ADMINISTRATION OF GRANT.— ‘‘(1) DURATION.—With respect to a grant made under subsection (a) in fiscal year 2020, the term of the grant shall be 4 years. ‘‘(2) DISBURSEMENT.—To the extent amounts are provided in appropriation Acts for such grant, the Di- rector shall disburse the amount of the grant made under subsection (a) on an annual basis.’’ PROHIBITION AGAINST DUPLICATION OF EFFORT Pub. L. 107–82, § 5, Dec. 14, 2001, 115 Stat. 821, provided that: ‘‘The Director of the Office of National Drug Con- trol Policy shall ensure that the same or similar activi- ties are not carried out, through the use of funds for ad- ministrative costs provided under subchapter II [prob- ably means chapter 2] of the National Narcotics Lead- ership Act of 1988 (21 U.S.C. 1521 et seq.) or funds pro- vided under section 4 of this Act [set out as a note above], by more than one recipient of such funds.’’ § 1522. Purposes The purposes of this subchapter are— (1) to reduce substance use and misuse among youth in communities throughout the United States, and over time, to reduce sub- stance use and misuse among adults; (2) to strengthen collaboration among com- munities, the Federal Government, and State, local, and tribal governments; (3) to enhance intergovernmental coopera- tion and coordination on the issue of sub- stance use and misuse among youth; (4) to serve as a catalyst for increased cit- izen participation and greater collaboration among all sectors and organizations of a com- munity that first demonstrates a long-term commitment to reducing substance use and misuse among youth; (5) to rechannel resources from the fiscal year 1998 Federal drug control budget to pro- vide technical assistance, guidance, and finan- cial support to communities that demonstrate a long-term commitment in reducing sub- stance use and misuse among youth; (6) to disseminate to communities timely in- formation regarding the state-of-the-art prac- tices and initiatives that have proven to be ef- fective in reducing substance use and misuse among youth; (7) to enhance, not supplant, local commu- nity initiatives for reducing substance use and misuse among youth; and (8) to encourage the creation of and support for community anti-drug coalitions through- out the United States. (Pub. L. 100–690, title I, § 1022, as added Pub. L. 105–20, § 2(a)(2), June 27, 1997, 111 Stat. 225; amended Pub. L. 115–271, title VIII, § 8203(b)(1), Oct. 24, 2018, 132 Stat. 4111; Pub. L. 116–74, § 2(c)(1)(A)(ii)(II), Nov. 27, 2019, 133 Stat. 1157.) Editorial Notes AMENDMENTS 2019—Pub. L. 116–74, § 2(c)(1)(A)(ii)(II), made technical amendment to directory language of Pub. L. 115–271, § 8203(b)(1). See 2018 Amendment note below. 2018—Pub. L. 115–271, § 8203(b)(1), as amended by Pub. L. 116–74, § 2(c)(1)(A)(ii)(II), substituted ‘‘substance use and misuse’’ for ‘‘substance abuse’’ wherever appearing. Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2019 AMENDMENT Pub. L. 116–74, § 2(c)(2), Nov. 27, 2019, 133 Stat. 1158, provided that: ‘‘The amendments made by this sub- section [amending this section, sections 1506, 1523, 1524, 1531 to 1533, 1535, 1541 to 1548, and 1705 of this title, and provisions set out as notes under sections 1521, 1524, and 1532 of this title] shall take effect as if included in the enactment of the Substance Abuse Prevention Act of 2018 (subtitle K of title VIII of Public Law 115–271) [see Tables for classification].’’ § 1523. Definitions In this subchapter: (1) Administrator The term ‘‘Administrator’’ means the Ad- ministrator appointed by the Director under section 1531(c) of this title. Page 942 TITLE 21—FOOD AND DRUGS § 1524 1 See References in Text note below. 2 So in original. (2) Advisory Commission The term ‘‘Advisory Commission’’ means the Advisory Commission established under sec- tion 1541 1 of this title. (3) Community The term ‘‘community’’ shall have the meaning provided that term by the Adminis- trator, in consultation with the Advisory Commission. (4) Director The term ‘‘Director’’ means the Director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy. (5) Eligible coalition The term ‘‘eligible coalition’’ means a coali- tion that meets the applicable criteria under section 1532(a) of this title. (6) Grant recipient The term ‘‘grant recipient’’ means the re- cipient of a grant award under section 1532 of this title. (7) Nonprofit organization The term ‘‘nonprofit organization’’ means an organization described under section 501(c)(3) of title 26 that is exempt from taxation under section 501(a) of title 26. (8) Program The term ‘‘Program’’ means the program es- tablished under section 1531(a) of this title. (9) Substance use and misuse The term ‘‘substance use and misuse’’ means— (A) the illegal use or misuse of drugs, in- cluding substances for which a listing is ef- fect 2 under any of schedules I through V under section 812 of this title; (B) the misuse of inhalants or over-the- counter drugs; or (C) the use of alcohol, tobacco, or other re- lated product as such use is prohibited by State or local law. (10) Youth The term ‘‘youth’’ shall have the meaning provided that term by the Administrator, in consultation with the Advisory Commission. (Pub. L. 100–690, title I, § 1023, as added Pub. L. 105–20, § 2(a)(2), June 27, 1997, 111 Stat. 225; amended Pub. L. 115–271, title VIII, § 8203(b)(2), Oct. 24, 2018, 132 Stat. 4111; Pub. L. 116–74, § 2(c)(1)(A)(ii)(II), Nov. 27, 2019, 133 Stat. 1157.) Editorial Notes REFERENCES IN TEXT Section 1541 of this title, referred to in par. (2), was repealed by Pub. L. 115–271, title VIII, § 8203(b)(5), Oct. 24, 2018, 132 Stat. 4112. AMENDMENTS 2019—Par. (9). Pub. L. 116–74, § 2(c)(1)(A)(ii)(II), made technical amendment to directory language of Pub. L. 115–271, § 8203(b)(2). See 2018 Amendment note below. 2018—Par. (9). Pub. L. 115–271, § 8203(b)(2), as amended by Pub. L. 116–74, § 2(c)(1)(A)(ii)(II), added par. (9) and struck out former par. (9) which defined ‘‘substance abuse’’. Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2019 AMENDMENT Amendment by Pub. L. 116–74 effective as if included in the enactment of subtitle K of title VIII of Pub. L. 115–271, see section 2(c)(2) of Pub. L. 116–74, set out as a note under section 1522 of this title. § 1524. Authorization of appropriations (a) In general There is authorized to be appropriated to the Office of National Drug Control Policy to carry out this subchapter $99,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2018 through 2023. (b) Administrative costs Not more than 8 percent of the funds appro- priated to carry out this subchapter may be used by the Office of National Drug Control Policy to pay administrative costs associated with the re- sponsibilities of the Office under this sub- chapter. (Pub. L. 100–690, title I, § 1024, as added Pub. L. 105–20, § 2(a)(2), June 27, 1997, 111 Stat. 226; amended Pub. L. 107–82, § 1(b), (c), Dec. 14, 2001, 115 Stat. 817; Pub. L. 109–469, title VIII, § 801, Dec. 29, 2006, 120 Stat. 3535; Pub. L. 115–271, title VIII, § 8203(a)(3)(A), (b)(3), formerly § 8203(a)(4)(A), (b)(3), Oct. 24, 2018, 132 Stat. 4111, renumbered Pub. L. 116–74, § 2(c)(1)(A)(i)(IV), Nov. 27, 2019, 133 Stat. 1157; Pub. L. 116–74, § 2(c)(1)(A)(i)(V), (ii)(II), Nov. 27, 2019, 133 Stat. 1157.) Editorial Notes AMENDMENTS 2019—Pub. L. 116–74, § 2(c)(1)(A)(ii)(II), made technical amendment to directory language of Pub. L. 115–271, § 8203(b)(3). See 2018 Amendment note below. Pub. L. 116–74, § 2(c)(1)(A)(i)(V), made technical amendment to directory language of Pub. L. 115–271, § 8203(a)(3)(A). See 2018 Amendment note below. 2018—Pub. L. 115–271, § 8203(b)(3), as amended by Pub. L. 116–74, § 2(c)(1)(A)(ii)(II), added subsecs. (a) and (b) and struck out former subsecs. (a) and (b), which re- lated to authorization of appropriations and adminis- trative costs, respectively. Pub. L. 115–271, § 8203(a)(3)(A), formerly § 8203(a)(4)(A), as renumbered and amended by Pub. L. 116–74, § 2(c)(1)(A)(i)(IV), (V), amended directory language of Pub. L. 109–469, § 801. See 2006 Amendment notes below. 2006—Subsec. (a)(11) to (15). Pub. L. 109–469, § 801(a), as amended by Pub. L. 115–271, § 8203(a)(3)(A), added pars. (11) to (15). Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 109–469, § 801(b), as amended by Pub. L. 115–271, § 8203(a)(3)(A), amended subsec. (b) gen- erally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: ‘‘Not more than the following percentages of the amounts authorized under subsection (a) of this section may be used to pay administrative costs: ‘‘(1) 10 percent for fiscal year 1998. ‘‘(2) 6 percent for fiscal year 1999. ‘‘(3) 4 percent for fiscal year 2000. ‘‘(4) 3 percent for fiscal year 2001. ‘‘(5) 6 percent for each of fiscal years 2002 through 2007.’’ 2001—Subsec. (a)(5) to (10). Pub. L. 107–82, § 1(b), added pars. (5) to (10) and struck out former par. (5) which read as follows: ‘‘$43,500,000 for fiscal year 2002.’’ Subsec. (b)(5). Pub. L. 107–82, § 1(c), added par. (5) and struck out former par. (5) which read as follows: ‘‘3 per- cent for fiscal year 2002.’’

Cross-references

Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

21 U.S.C. § 1521 — Technical assistance and training

**(a) In general** (1) **Technical assistance and agreements** — With respect to any grant recipient or other organization, the Administrator may— (A) offer technical assistance and training; and (B) enter into contracts and cooperative agreements. (2) **Coordination of programs** — The Administrator may facilitate the coordination of programs between a grant recipient and other organizations and entities. **(b) Training** The Administrator may provide training to any representative designated by a grant recipient in— (1) coalition building; (2) task force development; (3) mediation and facilitation, direct service, assessment and evaluation; or (4) any other activity related to the purposes of the Program.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 21 U.S.C. § 1521

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 21 U.S.C. § 1521. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

21 U.S.C. § 1521 — Findings

Page 939 TITLE 21—FOOD AND DRUGS § 1521 EFFECTIVE DATE OF REPEAL Repeal effective Sept. 30, 1997, see section 1009 of Pub. L. 100–690, which was formerly classified to section 1506 of this title. § 1509. Repealed. Pub. L. 109–469, title XI, § 1101(b), Dec. 29, 2006, 120 Stat. 3539 Section, Pub. L. 100–690, title VI, § 6073, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4323; Pub. L. 101–647, title XX, § 2001(b), Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4854; Pub. L. 102–393, title VI, § 638(c), Oct. 6, 1992, 106 Stat. 1788; Pub. L. 103–322, title IX, § 90205(a), (d), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1994, 1995; Pub. L. 105–277, div. C, title VII, § 712, Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–692, re- lated to establishment of Special Forfeiture Fund. SUBCHAPTER II—DRUG-FREE COMMUNITIES Editorial Notes CODIFICATION This subchapter is chapter 2 of subtitle A of title I of Pub. L. 100–690. Section 1009 of Pub. L. 100–690 [former 21 U.S.C. 1506] repealed subtitle A effective Sept. 30, 1997. However, that repeal was not executed to this sub- chapter because of Pub. L. 105–20, § 2(a)(1), (b), which not only designated subtitle A as chapter 1 of subtitle A, but also provided that any existing reference to sub- title A was to be deemed to be a reference to chapter 1 of subtitle A (see note set out under former section 1501 of this title). Based on that provision, the repeal was executed in the Code only to subchapter I of this chapter, which comprises chapter 1 of subtitle A, and not to this subchapter, which comprises chapter 2. Nev- ertheless, Pub. L. 115–271, title VIII, § 8203(a)(1), (2), Oct. 24, 2018, 132 Stat. 4110 (set out as a note under section 1521 of this title), directed the revival and restoration of chapter 2 (this subchapter), except for subchapter II thereof (part B of this subchapter),

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 21 U.S.C. § 1521

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 21 U.S.C. § 1521. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

21 U.S.C. § 1523 — Community-based coalition enhancement grants to address local drug crises

**(a) Definitions** In this section: (1) **Administrator** — The term “Administrator” means the Administrator of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2) **Director** — The term “Director” means the Director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy. (3) **Drug-Free Communities Act of 1997** — The term “Drug-Free Communities Act of 1997” means chapter 2 of the National Narcotics Leadership Act of 1988 ([21 U.S.C. 1521](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title21-section1521&num=0&edition=prelim) et seq.). (4) **Eligible entity** — The term “eligible entity” means an organization that— (A) on or before the date of submitting an application for a grant under this section, receives or has received a grant under the Drug-Free Communities Act of 1997; and (B) has documented, using local data, rates of abuse of opioids or methamphetamines at levels that are— (i) significantly higher than the national average as determined by the Secretary (including appropriate consideration of the results of the Monitoring the Future Survey published by the National Institute on Drug Abuse and the National Survey on Drug Use and Health published by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration); or (ii) higher than the national average, as determined by the Secretary (including appropriate consideration of the results of the surveys described in clause (i)), over a sustained period of time. (5) **Emerging drug abuse issue** — The term “emerging drug abuse issue” means a substance use disorder within an area involving— (A) a sudden increase in demand for particular drug abuse treatment services relative to previous demand; and (B) a lack of resources in the area to address the emerging problem.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 21 U.S.C. § 1523

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.