Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
21 U.S.C. § 1523 — Community-based coalition enhancement grants to address local drug crises
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Definitions** In this section:
(1) **Administrator** — The term “Administrator” means the Administrator of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
(2) **Director** — The term “Director” means the Director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy.
(3) **Drug-Free Communities Act of 1997** — The term “Drug-Free Communities Act of 1997” means chapter 2 of the National Narcotics Leadership Act of 1988 ([21 U.S.C. 1521](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title21-section1521&num=0&edition=prelim) et seq.).
(4) **Eligible entity** — The term “eligible entity” means an organization that—
(A) on or before the date of submitting an application for a grant under this section, receives or has received a grant under the Drug-Free Communities Act of 1997; and
(B) has documented, using local data, rates of abuse of opioids or methamphetamines at levels that are—
(i) significantly higher than the national average as determined by the Secretary (including appropriate consideration of the results of the Monitoring the Future Survey published by the National Institute on Drug Abuse and the National Survey on Drug Use and Health published by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration); or
(ii) higher than the national average, as determined by the Secretary (including appropriate consideration of the results of the surveys described in clause (i)), over a sustained period of time.
(5) **Emerging drug abuse issue** — The term “emerging drug abuse issue” means a substance use disorder within an area involving—
(A) a sudden increase in demand for particular drug abuse treatment services relative to previous demand; and
(B) a lack of resources in the area to address the emerging problem.
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 21 U.S.C. § 1523
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: 7f7c70035660b0704a6640411fefcf2fcab9e0c0de0f2ef4e3de628da9e3a91b. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:record_usc_ad438e5ca206c32560ee5fa0
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code/title-21/section-1523-community-based-coalition-enhancement-grants-to-address-local-drug-crise--7c77c064da.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 23f11a7560284cb23a3e631d6af07e7282317f12bdadbb4d549d6e1bae32b96a
Source location: Title 21, Chapter 20, § 1523; chapter-020-national-drug-control-program.md
Stored source content
**(a) Definitions** In this section:
(1) **Administrator** — The term “Administrator” means the Administrator of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
(2) **Director** — The term “Director” means the Director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy.
(3) **Drug-Free Communities Act of 1997** — The term “Drug-Free Communities Act of 1997” means chapter 2 of the National Narcotics Leadership Act of 1988 ([21 U.S.C. 1521](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title21-section1521&num=0&edition=prelim) et seq.).
(4) **Eligible entity** — The term “eligible entity” means an organization that—
(A) on or before the date of submitting an application for a grant under this section, receives or has received a grant under the Drug-Free Communities Act of 1997; and
(B) has documented, using local data, rates of abuse of opioids or methamphetamines at levels that are—
(i) significantly higher than the national average as determined by the Secretary (including appropriate consideration of the results of the Monitoring the Future Survey published by the National Institute on Drug Abuse and the National Survey on Drug Use and Health published by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration); or
(ii) higher than the national average, as determined by the Secretary (including appropriate consideration of the results of the surveys described in clause (i)), over a sustained period of time.
(5) **Emerging drug abuse issue** — The term “emerging drug abuse issue” means a substance use disorder within an area involving—
(A) a sudden increase in demand for particular drug abuse treatment services relative to previous demand; and
(B) a lack of resources in the area to address the emerging problem.
(6) **Local drug crisis** — The term “local drug crisis” means, with respect to the area served by an eligible entity—
(A) a sudden increase in the abuse of opioids or methamphetamines, as documented by local data;
(B) the abuse of prescription medications, specifically opioids or methamphetamines, that is significantly higher than the national average, over a sustained period of time, as documented by local data; or
(C) a sudden increase in opioid-related deaths, as documented by local data.
(7) **Opioid** — The term “opioid” means any drug having an addiction-forming or addiction-sustaining liability similar to morphine or being capable of conversion into a drug having such addiction-forming or addiction-sustaining liability.
**(b) Program authorized** The Director, in coordination with the Administrator, may make grants to eligible entities to implement comprehensive community-wide strategies that address local drug crises and emerging drug abuse issues within the area served by the eligible entity.
**(c) Application**
(1) **In general** — An eligible entity seeking a grant under this section shall submit an application to the Director at such time, in such manner, and accompanied by such information as the Director may require.
(2) **Criteria** — As part of an application for a grant under this section, the Director shall require an eligible entity to submit a detailed, comprehensive, multisector plan for addressing the local drug crisis or emerging drug abuse issue within the area served by the eligible entity.
**(d) Use of funds** An eligible entity shall use a grant received under this section—
(1) for programs designed to implement comprehensive community-wide prevention strategies to address the local drug crisis in the area served by the eligible entity, in accordance with the plan submitted under subsection (c)(2);
(2) to obtain specialized training and technical assistance from the organization funded under section 4 of Public Law 107–82 ([21 U.S.C. 1521](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title21-section1521&num=0&edition=prelim) note); and
(3) for programs designed to implement comprehensive community-wide strategies to address emerging drug abuse issues in the community.
**(e) Supplement not supplant** An eligible entity shall use Federal funds received under this section only to supplement the funds that would, in the absence of those Federal funds, be made available from other Federal and non-Federal sources for the activities described in this section, and not to supplant those funds.
**(f) Evaluation** A grant under this section shall be subject to the same evaluation requirements and procedures as the evaluation requirements and procedures imposed on the recipient of a grant under the Drug-Free Communities Act of 1997, and may also include an evaluation of the effectiveness at reducing abuse of opioids or methamphetamines.
**(g) Limitation on administrative expenses** Not more than 8 percent of the amounts made available to carry out this section for a fiscal year may be used to pay for administrative expenses.
**(h) Delegation authority** The Director may enter into an interagency agreement with the Administrator to delegate authority for the execution of grants and for such other activities as may be necessary to carry out this section.
**(i) Authorization of appropriations** For the purpose of carrying out this section, there are authorized to be appropriated $5,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2017 through 2021.
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) In general**
(1) **Technical assistance and agreements** — With respect to any grant recipient or other organization, the Administrator may—
(A) offer technical assistance and training; and
(B) enter into contracts and cooperative agreements.
(2) **Coordination of programs** — The Administrator may facilitate the coordination of programs between a grant recipient and other organizations and entities.
**(b) Training** The Administrator may provide training to any representative designated by a grant recipient in—
(1) coalition building;
(2) task force development;
(3) mediation and facilitation, direct service, assessment and evaluation; or
(4) any other activity related to the purposes of the Program.
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 21 U.S.C. § 1521
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 939
TITLE 21—FOOD AND DRUGS
§ 1521
EFFECTIVE DATE OF REPEAL
Repeal effective Sept. 30, 1997, see section 1009 of Pub.
L. 100–690, which was formerly classified to section 1506
of this title.
§ 1509. Repealed. Pub. L. 109–469, title XI,
§ 1101(b), Dec. 29, 2006, 120 Stat. 3539
Section, Pub. L. 100–690, title VI, § 6073, Nov. 18, 1988,
102 Stat. 4323; Pub. L. 101–647, title XX, § 2001(b), Nov. 29,
1990, 104 Stat. 4854; Pub. L. 102–393, title VI, § 638(c), Oct.
6, 1992, 106 Stat. 1788; Pub. L. 103–322, title IX, § 90205(a),
(d), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1994, 1995; Pub. L. 105–277,
div. C, title VII, § 712, Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–692, re-
lated to establishment of Special Forfeiture Fund.
SUBCHAPTER II—DRUG-FREE
COMMUNITIES
Editorial Notes
CODIFICATION
This subchapter is chapter 2 of subtitle A of title I of
Pub. L. 100–690. Section 1009 of Pub. L. 100–690 [former
21 U.S.C. 1506] repealed subtitle A effective Sept. 30,
1997. However, that repeal was not executed to this sub-
chapter because of Pub. L. 105–20, § 2(a)(1), (b), which
not only designated subtitle A as chapter 1 of subtitle
A, but also provided that any existing reference to sub-
title A was to be deemed to be a reference to chapter
1 of subtitle A (see note set out under former section
1501 of this title). Based on that provision, the repeal
was executed in the Code only to subchapter I of this
chapter, which comprises chapter 1 of subtitle A, and
not to this subchapter, which comprises chapter 2. Nev-
ertheless, Pub. L. 115–271, title VIII, § 8203(a)(1), (2), Oct.
24, 2018, 132 Stat. 4110 (set out as a note under section
1521 of this title), directed the revival and restoration
of chapter 2 (this subchapter), except for subchapter II
thereof (part B of this subchapter),
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 21 U.S.C. § 1521
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 21 U.S.C. § 1521. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 941
TITLE 21—FOOD AND DRUGS
§ 1523
‘‘(E) $5,900,000,000 in mental health and develop-
mental disabilities (31 percent of mental health
spending).
‘‘(F) $1,500,000,000 in public safety (26 percent of
public safety spending) and $400,000,000 for the state
workforce.
‘‘(8) Intergovernmental cooperation and coordina-
tion through national, State, and local or tribal lead-
ership and partnerships are critical to facilitate the
reduction of substance abuse among youth in commu-
nities across the United States.
‘‘(9) Substance abuse is perceived as a much greater
problem nationally than at the community level. Ac-
cording to a 2001 study sponsored by The Pew Chari-
table Trusts, between 1994 and 2000—
‘‘(A) there was a 43 percent increase in the per-
centage of Americans who felt progress was being
made in the war on drugs at the community level;
‘‘(B) only 9 percent of Americans say drug abuse
is a ‘crisis’ in their neighborhood, compared to 27
percent who say this about the nation; and
‘‘(C) the percentage of those who felt we lost
ground in the war on drugs on a community level
fell by more than a quarter, from 51 percent in 1994
to 37 percent in 2000.’’
AUTHORIZATION FOR NATIONAL COMMUNITY ANTIDRUG
COALITION INSTITUTE
Pub. L. 107–82, § 4, Dec. 14, 2001, 115 Stat. 821, as
amended by Pub. L. 109–469, title VIII, § 805, Dec. 29,
2006, 120 Stat. 3535; Pub. L. 115–271, title VIII, § 8204, Oct.
24, 2018, 132 Stat. 4112; Pub. L. 116–74, § 2(e), Nov. 27, 2019,
133 Stat. 1159, provided that:
‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Beginning in fiscal year 2020, the
Director shall make a competitive grant to provide for
the continuation of the National Community Anti-drug
[sic] Coalition Institute.
‘‘(b) ELIGIBLE ORGANIZATIONS.—An organization eligi-
ble for the grant unde
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 21 U.S.C. § 1523
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.