Arkansas Legal Resource Navigator

22 U.S.C. § 5811 — Findings

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

22 U.S.C. § 5811 — Findings

Page 1697 TITLE 22—FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE § 5811 ‘‘(2) sections 136 [22 U.S.C. 3943 note] and 804 [99 Stat. 449] of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1986 and 1987 (Public Law 99–93), ‘‘(3) section 1222 of the Foreign Relations Author- ization Act, Fiscal Years 1988 and 1989 (Public Law 100–204; 101 Stat. 1411 [1414]), ‘‘(4) the Multilateral Export Control Enhancement Amendments Act (50 [App.] U.S.C. 2410 note, et seq.) [probably means former 50 U.S.C. App. 2410a note, see Short Title of 1988 Amendment note now set out under former section 4601 of Title 50, War and Na- tional Defense], ‘‘(5) the joint resolution providing for the designa- tion of ‘Captive Nations Week’ (Public Law 86–90) [73 Stat. 212], ‘‘(6) the Communist Control Act of 1954 (Public Law 83–637) [see Short Title note set out under section 781 of Title 50], ‘‘(7) provisions in the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), including sections 101(a)(40), 101(e)(3), and 313(a)(3) [8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(40), (e)(3), 1424(a)(3)], ‘‘(8) section 2 of the joint resolution entitled ‘A joint resolution to promote peace and stability in the Middle East’, approved March 9, 1957 (Public Law 85–7) [22 U.S.C. 1961 et seq.], and ‘‘(9) section 43 of the Bretton Woods Agreements Act (22 U.S.C. 286aa), should not be construed as being directed against Rus- sia, Ukraine, or the other independent states of the former Soviet Union, connoting an adversarial rela- tionship between the United States and the inde- pendent states, or signifying or implying in any man- ner unfriendliness toward the independent states.’’ DEFINITIONS FOR PUB. L. 103–199 Pub. L. 103–199, § 3, Dec. 17, 1993, 107 Stat. 2318, pro- vided that: ‘‘As used in this Act [see Short Title of 1993

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 22 U.S.C. § 5811

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.

Original supplied file — preserved unchanged

Download original Markdown file

File SHA-256: 3616b395a0affb8abe9c26b94c1e0b774764a81614203c88b5093b99ff59c553. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.

Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.

Open the recorded source website ↗

Record provenance

Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-c14d71cb8dda1c760952549d
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-22/section-5811-findings--d77e30fd2f.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 462eb4bef35147f68f855da2ca4cd3dc495fab73359151fcda9b3fffc2b6c966

Source location: USCODE-2024-title22-chap67-subchapI-sec5811.pdf

Stored source content

Page 1697 TITLE 22—FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE § 5811 ‘‘(2) sections 136 [22 U.S.C. 3943 note] and 804 [99 Stat. 449] of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1986 and 1987 (Public Law 99–93), ‘‘(3) section 1222 of the Foreign Relations Author- ization Act, Fiscal Years 1988 and 1989 (Public Law 100–204; 101 Stat. 1411 [1414]), ‘‘(4) the Multilateral Export Control Enhancement Amendments Act (50 [App.] U.S.C. 2410 note, et seq.) [probably means former 50 U.S.C. App. 2410a note, see Short Title of 1988 Amendment note now set out under former section 4601 of Title 50, War and Na- tional Defense], ‘‘(5) the joint resolution providing for the designa- tion of ‘Captive Nations Week’ (Public Law 86–90) [73 Stat. 212], ‘‘(6) the Communist Control Act of 1954 (Public Law 83–637) [see Short Title note set out under section 781 of Title 50], ‘‘(7) provisions in the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), including sections 101(a)(40), 101(e)(3), and 313(a)(3) [8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(40), (e)(3), 1424(a)(3)], ‘‘(8) section 2 of the joint resolution entitled ‘A joint resolution to promote peace and stability in the Middle East’, approved March 9, 1957 (Public Law 85–7) [22 U.S.C. 1961 et seq.], and ‘‘(9) section 43 of the Bretton Woods Agreements Act (22 U.S.C. 286aa), should not be construed as being directed against Rus- sia, Ukraine, or the other independent states of the former Soviet Union, connoting an adversarial rela- tionship between the United States and the inde- pendent states, or signifying or implying in any man- ner unfriendliness toward the independent states.’’ DEFINITIONS FOR PUB. L. 103–199 Pub. L. 103–199, § 3, Dec. 17, 1993, 107 Stat. 2318, pro- vided that: ‘‘As used in this Act [see Short Title of 1993 Amendment note above] (including the amendments made by this Act), the terms ‘independent states of the former Soviet Union’ and ‘independent states’ have the meaning given those terms by section 3 of the Freedom for Russia and Emerging Eurasian Democracies and Open Markets Support Act of 1992 (22 U.S.C. 5801).’’ SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL PROVISIONS § 5811. Findings The Congress finds that— (1) recent developments in Russia and the other independent states of the former Soviet Union present an historic opportunity for a transition to a peaceful and stable inter- national order and the integration of the inde- pendent states of the former Soviet Union into the community of democratic nations; (2) the entire international community has a vital interest in the success of this transition, and the dimension of the problems now faced in the independent states of the former Soviet Union makes it imperative for donor countries and institutions to provide the expertise and support necessary to ensure continued progress on economic and political reforms; (3) the United States is especially well-posi- tioned because of its heritage and traditions to make a substantial contribution to this transition by building on current technical co- operation, medical, and food assistance pro- grams, by assisting in the development of democratic institutions, and by fostering con- ditions that will encourage the United States business community to engage in trade and in- vestment; (4) failure to meet the opportunities pre- sented by these developments could threaten United States national security interests and jeopardize substantial savings in United States defense that these developments have made possible; (5) the independent states of the former So- viet Union face unprecedented environmental problems that jeopardize the quality of life and the very existence of not only their own peoples but also the peoples of other countries, and it is incumbent on the international com- munity to assist the independent states in ad- dressing these problems and in promoting sus- tainable use of resources and development; (6) the success of United States assistance for the independent states of the former So- viet Union depends on— (A) effective coordination of United States efforts with similar activities of friendly and allied donor countries and of international financial institutions, and (B) reciprocal commitments by the govern- ments of the independent states to work to- ward the creation of democratic institutions and an environment hospitable to foreign in- vestment based upon the rule of law, includ- ing negotiation of bilateral and multilateral agreements on open trade and investment, adoption of commercial codes, establishment of transparency in regulatory and other gov- ernmental decision making, and timely pay- ment of obligations carried over from pre- vious governmental entities; and (7) trade and investment opportunities in the independent states of the former Soviet Union will generate employment and other economic benefits for the United States as the economies of the independent states of the former Soviet Union begin to realize their enormous potential as both customers and suppliers. (Pub. L. 102–511, title I, § 101, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3321.) Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries SERGEI MAGNITSKY RULE OF LAW ACCOUNTABILITY Pub. L. 112–208, title IV, Dec. 14, 2012, 126 Stat. 1502, provided that: ‘‘SEC. 401. SHORT TITLE. ‘‘This title may be cited as the ‘Sergei Magnitsky Rule of Law Accountability Act of 2012’. ‘‘SEC. 402. FINDINGS; SENSE OF CONGRESS. ‘‘(a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following: ‘‘(1) The United States aspires to a mutually bene- ficial relationship with the Russian Federation based on respect for human rights and the rule of law, and supports the people of the Russian Federation in their efforts to realize their full economic potential and to advance democracy, human rights, and the rule of law. ‘‘(2) The Russian Federation— ‘‘(A) is a member of the United Nations, the Orga- nization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, the Council of Europe, and the International Mone- tary Fund; ‘‘(B) has ratified the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and the United Nations Con- vention against Corruption; and ‘‘(C) is bound by the legal obligations set forth in the European Convention on Human Rights. Page 1698 TITLE 22—FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE § 5811 ‘‘(3) States voluntarily commit themselves to re- spect obligations and responsibilities through the adoption of international agreements and treaties, which must be observed in good faith in order to maintain the stability of the international order. Human rights are an integral part of international law, and lie at the foundation of the international order. The protection of human rights, therefore, par- ticularly in the case of a country that has incurred obligations to protect human rights under an inter- national agreement to which it is a party, is not left exclusively to the internal affairs of that country. ‘‘(4) Good governance and anti-corruption measures are instrumental in the protection of human rights and in achieving sustainable economic growth, which benefits both the people of the Russian Federation and the international community through the cre- ation of open and transparent markets. ‘‘(5) Systemic corruption erodes trust and con- fidence in democratic institutions, the rule of law, and human rights protections. This is the case when public officials are allowed to abuse their authority with impunity for political or financial gains in col- lusion with private entities. ‘‘(6) The Russian nongovernmental organization INDEM has estimated that bribes by individuals and businesses in the Russian Federation amount to hun- dreds of billions of dollars a year, an increasing share of the country’s gross domestic product. ‘‘(7) Sergei Leonidovich Magnitsky died on Novem- ber 16, 2009, at the age of 37, in Matrosskaya Tishina Prison in Moscow, Russia, and is survived by a moth- er, a wife, and 2 sons. ‘‘(8) On July 6, 2011, Russian President Dimitry Medvedev’s Human Rights Council announced the re- sults of its independent investigation into the death of Sergei Magnitsky. The Human Rights Council con- cluded that Sergei Magnitsky’s arrest and detention was illegal; he was denied access to justice by the courts and prosecutors of the Russian Federation; he was investigated by the same law enforcement offi- cers whom he had accused of stealing Hermitage Fund companies and illegally obtaining a fraudulent $230,000,000 tax refund; he was denied necessary med- ical care in custody; he was beaten by 8 guards with rubber batons on the last day of his life; and the am- bulance crew that was called to treat him as he was dying was deliberately kept outside of his cell for one hour and 18 minutes until he was dead. The report of the Human Rights Council also states the officials falsified their accounts of what happened to Sergei Magnitsky and, 18 months after his death, no officials had been brought to trial for his false arrest or the crime he uncovered. The impunity continued in April 2012, when Russian authorities dropped criminal charges against Larisa Litvinova, the head doctor at the prison where Magnitsky died. ‘‘(9) The systematic abuse of Sergei Magnitsky, in- cluding his repressive arrest and torture in custody by officers of the Ministry of the Interior of the Rus- sian Federation that Mr. Magnitsky had implicated in the embezzlement of funds from the Russian Treas- ury and the misappropriation of 3 companies from his client, Hermitage Capital Management, reflects how deeply the protection of human rights is affected by corruption. ‘‘(10) The politically motivated nature of the perse- cution of Mr. Magnitsky is demonstrated by— ‘‘(A) the denial by all state bodies of the Russian Federation of any justice or legal remedies to Mr. Magnitsky during the nearly 12 full months he was kept without trial in detention; and ‘‘(B) the impunity since his death of state offi- cials he testified against for their involvement in corruption and the carrying out of his repressive persecution. ‘‘(11) The Public Oversight Commission of the City of Moscow for the Control of the Observance of Human Rights in Places of Forced Detention, an or- ganization empowered by Russian law to independ- ently monitor prison conditions, concluded on De- cember 29, 2009, ‘A man who is kept in custody and is being detained is not capable of using all the nec- essary means to protect either his life or his health. This is a responsibility of a state which holds him captive. Therefore, the case of Sergei Magnitsky can be described as a breach of the right to life. The mem- bers of the civic supervisory commission have reached the conclusion that Magnitsky had been ex- periencing both psychological and physical pressure in custody, and the conditions in some of the wards of Butyrka can be justifiably called torturous. The people responsible for this must be punished.’. ‘‘(12) Sergei Magnitsky’s experience, while particu- larly illustrative of the negative effects of official corruption on the rights of an individual citizen, ap- pears to be emblematic of a broader pattern of dis- regard for the numerous domestic and international human rights commitments of the Russian Federa- tion and impunity for those who violate basic human rights and freedoms. ‘‘(13) The second trial, verdict, and sentence against former Yukos executives Mikhail Khodorkovsky and Platon Lebedev evoke serious concerns about the right to a fair trial and the independence of the judi- ciary in the Russian Federation. The lack of credible charges, intimidation of witnesses, violations of due process and procedural norms, falsification or with- holding of documents, denial of attorney-client privi- lege, and illegal detention in the Yukos case are high- ly troubling. The Council of Europe, Freedom House, and Amnesty International, among others, have con- cluded that they were charged and imprisoned in a process that did not follow the rule of law and was politically influenced. Furthermore, senior officials of the Government of the Russian Federation, includ- ing First Deputy Prime Minister Igor Shuvalov, have acknowledged that the arrest and imprisonment of Khodorkovsky were politically motivated. ‘‘(14) According to Freedom House’s 2011 report en- titled ‘The Perpetual Battle: Corruption in the Former Soviet Union and the New EU Members’, ‘[t]he highly publicized cases of Sergei Magnitsky, a 37-year-old lawyer who died in pretrial detention in November 2009 after exposing a multimillion-dollar fraud against the Russian taxpayer, and Mikhail Khodorkovsky, the jailed business magnate and re- gime critic who was sentenced at the end of 2010 to remain in prison through 2017, put an international spotlight on the Russian state’s contempt for the rule of law * * *. By silencing influential and accom- plished figures such as Khodorkovsky and Magnitsky, the Russian authorities have made it abundantly clear that anyone in Russia can be silenced.’. ‘‘(15) The tragic and unresolved murders of Nustap Abdurakhmanov, Maksharip Aushev, Natalya Estemirova, Akhmed Hadjimagomedov, Umar Israilov, Paul Klebnikov, Anna Politkovskaya, Saihadji Saihadjiev, and Magomed Y. Yevloyev, the death in custody of Vera Trifonova, the disappear- ances of Mokhmadsalakh Masaev and Said-Saleh Ibragimov, the torture of Ali Israilov and Islam Umarpashaev, the near-fatal beatings of Mikhail Beketov, Oleg Kashin, Arkadiy Lander, and Mikhail Vinyukov, and the harsh and ongoing imprisonment of Mikhail Khodorkovsky, Alexei Kozlov, Platon Lebedev, and Fyodor Mikheev further illustrate the grave danger of exposing the wrongdoing of officials of the Government of the Russian Federation, includ- ing Chechen leader Ramzan Kadyrov, or of seeking to obtain, exercise, defend, or promote internationally recognized human rights and freedoms. ‘‘(b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that the United States should continue to strongly sup- port, and provide assistance to, the efforts of the Rus- sian people to establish a vibrant democratic political system that respects individual liberties and human rights, including by enhancing the provision of objec- tive information through all relevant media, such as Radio Liberty and the internet. The Russian Govern- Page 1699 TITLE 22—FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE § 5811 ment’s suppression of dissent and political opposition, the limitations it has imposed on civil society and independent media, and the deterioration of economic and political freedom inside Russia are of profound con- cern to the United States Government and to the American people. ‘‘SEC. 403. DEFINITIONS. ‘‘In this title: ‘‘(1) ADMITTED; ALIEN.—The terms ‘admitted’ and ‘alien’ have the meanings given those terms in sec- tion 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101). ‘‘(2) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES.—The term ‘appropriate congressional committees’ means— ‘‘(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Com- mittee on Financial Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on Homeland Secu- rity, and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives; and ‘‘(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Com- mittee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, the Committee on Foreign Relations, the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, and the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate. ‘‘(3) FINANCIAL INSTITUTION.—The term ‘financial in- stitution’ has the meaning given that term in section 5312 of title 31, United States Code. ‘‘(4) UNITED STATES PERSON.—The term ‘United States person’ means— ‘‘(A) a United States citizen or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence to the United States; or ‘‘(B) an entity organized under the laws of the United States or of any jurisdiction within the United States, including a foreign branch of such an entity. ‘‘SEC. 404. IDENTIFICATION OF PERSONS RESPON- SIBLE FOR THE DETENTION, ABUSE, AND DEATH OF SERGEI MAGNITSKY AND OTHER GROSS VIOLATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS. ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 14, 2012], the President shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a list of each person who the President de- termines, based on credible information— ‘‘(1) is responsible for the detention, abuse, or death of Sergei Magnitsky, participated in efforts to con- ceal the legal liability for the detention, abuse, or death of Sergei Magnitsky, financially benefitted from the detention, abuse, or death of Sergei Magnitsky, or was involved in the criminal con- spiracy uncovered by Sergei Magnitsky; ‘‘(2) is responsible for extrajudicial killings, tor- ture, or other gross violations of internationally rec- ognized human rights committed against individuals seeking— ‘‘(A) to expose illegal activity carried out by offi- cials of the Government of the Russian Federation; or ‘‘(B) to obtain, exercise, defend, or promote inter- nationally recognized human rights and freedoms, such as the freedoms of religion, expression, asso- ciation, and assembly, and the rights to a fair trial and democratic elections, in Russia; or ‘‘(3) acted as an agent of or on behalf of a person in a matter relating to an activity described in para- graph (1) or (2). ‘‘(b) UPDATES.—The President shall submit to the ap- propriate congressional committees an update of the list required by subsection (a) as new information be- comes available. ‘‘(c) FORM.— ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The list required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form. ‘‘(2) EXCEPTION.—The name of a person to be in- cluded in the list required by subsection (a) may be submitted in a classified annex only if the Presi- dent— ‘‘(A) determines that it is vital for the national security interests of the United States to do so; ‘‘(B) uses the annex in such a manner consistent with congressional intent and the purposes of this Act; and ‘‘(C) 15 days prior to submitting the name in a classified annex, provides to the appropriate con- gressional committees notice of, and a justification for, including or continuing to include each person in the classified annex despite any publicly avail- able credible information indicating that the per- son engaged in an activity described in paragraph (1), (2), or (3) of subsection (a). ‘‘(3) CONSIDERATION OF DATA FROM OTHER COUNTRIES AND NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS.—In preparing the list required by subsection (a), the President shall consider information provided by the chairperson and ranking member of each of the appropriate congres- sional committees and credible data obtained by other countries and nongovernmental organizations, including organizations inside Russia, that monitor the human rights abuses of the Government of the Russian Federation. ‘‘(4) PUBLIC AVAILABILITY.—The unclassified portion of the list required by subsection (a) shall be made available to the public and published in the Federal Register. ‘‘(d) REMOVAL FROM LIST.—A person may be removed from the list required by subsection (a) if the President determines and reports to the appropriate congres- sional committees not less than 15 days prior to the re- moval of the person from the list that— ‘‘(1) credible information exists that the person did not engage in the activity for which the person was added to the list; ‘‘(2) the person has been prosecuted appropriately for the activity in which the person engaged; or ‘‘(3) the person has credibly demonstrated a signifi- cant change in behavior, has paid an appropriate con- sequence for the activities in which the person en- gaged, and has credibly committed to not engage in the types of activities specified in paragraphs (1) through (3) of subsection (a). ‘‘(e) REQUESTS BY CHAIRPERSON AND RANKING MEMBER OF APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES.— ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 120 days after re- ceiving a written request from the chairperson and ranking member of one of the appropriate congres- sional committees with respect to whether a person meets the criteria for being added to the list required by subsection (a), the President shall submit a re- sponse to the chairperson and ranking member of the committee which made the request with respect to the status of the person. ‘‘(2) FORM.—The President may submit a response required by paragraph (1) in classified form if the President determines that it is necessary for the na- tional security interests of the United States to do so. ‘‘(3) REMOVAL.—If the President removes from the list required by subsection (a) a person who has been placed on the list at the request of the chairperson and ranking member of one of the appropriate con- gressional committees, the President shall provide the chairperson and ranking member with any infor- mation that contributed to the removal decision. The President may submit such information in classified form if the President determines that such is nec- essary for the national security interests of the United States. ‘‘(f) NONAPPLICABILITY OF CONFIDENTIALITY REQUIRE- MENT WITH RESPECT TO VISA RECORDS.—The President shall publish the list required by subsection (a) without regard to the requirements of section 222(f) of the Im- migration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1202(f)) with re- spect to confidentiality of records pertaining to the issuance or refusal of visas or permits to enter the United States. ‘‘SEC. 405. INADMISSIBILITY OF CERTAIN ALIENS. ‘‘(a) INELIGIBILITY FOR VISAS.—An alien is ineligible to receive a visa to enter the United States and ineli- Page 1700 TITLE 22—FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE § 5811 gible to be admitted to the United States if the alien is on the list required by section 404(a). ‘‘(b) CURRENT VISAS REVOKED.—The Secretary of State shall revoke, in accordance with section 221(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1201(i)), the visa or other documentation of any alien who would be ineligible to receive such a visa or docu- mentation under subsection (a) of this section. ‘‘(c) WAIVER FOR NATIONAL SECURITY INTERESTS.— ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of State may waive the application of subsection (a) or (b) in the case of an alien if— ‘‘(A) the Secretary determines that such a waiv- er— ‘‘(i) is necessary to permit the United States to comply with the Agreement between the United Nations and the United States of America regard- ing the Headquarters of the United Nations, signed June 26, 1947, and entered into force No- vember 21, 1947, or other applicable international obligations of the United States; or ‘‘(ii) is in the national security interests of the United States; and ‘‘(B) prior to granting such a waiver, the Sec- retary provides to the appropriate congressional committees notice of, and a justification for, the waiver. ‘‘(2) TIMING FOR CERTAIN WAIVERS.—Notification under subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1) shall be made not later than 15 days prior to granting a waiver under such paragraph if the Secretary grants such waiver in the national security interests of the United States in accordance with subparagraph (A)(ii) of such paragraph. ‘‘(d) REGULATORY AUTHORITY.—The Secretary of State shall prescribe such regulations as are necessary to carry out this section. ‘‘SEC. 406. FINANCIAL MEASURES. ‘‘(a) FREEZING OF ASSETS.— ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The President shall exercise all powers granted by the International Emergency Eco- nomic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (except that the requirements of section 202 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 1701) shall not apply) to the extent necessary to freeze and prohibit all transactions in all property and interests in property of a person who is on the list required by section 404(a) of this Act if such prop- erty and interests in property are in the United States, come within the United States, or are or come within the possession or control of a United States person. ‘‘(2) EXCEPTION.—Paragraph (1) shall not apply to persons included on the classified annex under sec- tion 404(c)(2) if the President determines that such an exception is vital for the national security interests of the United States. ‘‘(b) WAIVER FOR NATIONAL SECURITY INTERESTS.—The Secretary of the Treasury may waive the application of subsection (a) if the Secretary determines that such a waiver is in the national security interests of the United States. Not less than 15 days prior to granting such a waiver, the Secretary shall provide to the appro- priate congressional committees notice of, and a jus- tification for, the waiver. ‘‘(c) ENFORCEMENT.— ‘‘(1) PENALTIES.—A person that violates, attempts to violate, conspires to violate, or causes a violation of this section or any regulation, license, or order issued to carry out this section shall be subject to the penalties set forth in subsections (b) and (c) of sec- tion 206 of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1705) to the same extent as a person that commits an unlawful act described in subsection (a) of such section. ‘‘(2) REQUIREMENTS FOR FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS.— Not later than 120 days after the date of the enact- ment of this Act [Dec. 14, 2012], the Secretary of the Treasury shall prescribe or amend regulations as needed to require each financial institution that is a United States person and has within its possession or control assets that are property or interests in prop- erty of a person who is on the list required by section 404(a) if such property and interests in property are in the United States to certify to the Secretary that, to the best of the knowledge of the financial institu- tion, the financial institution has frozen all assets within the possession or control of the financial insti- tution that are required to be frozen pursuant to sub- section (a). ‘‘(d) REGULATORY AUTHORITY.—The Secretary of the Treasury shall issue such regulations, licenses, and or- ders as are necessary to carry out this section. ‘‘SEC. 407. REPORT TO CONGRESS. ‘‘Not later than one year after the date of the enact- ment of this Act [Dec. 14, 2012] and annually thereafter, the Secretary of State and the Secretary of the Treas- ury shall submit to the appropriate congressional com- mittees a report on— ‘‘(1) the actions taken to carry out this title, in- cluding— ‘‘(A) the number of persons added to or removed from the list required by section 404(a) during the year preceding the report, the dates on which such persons have been added or removed, and the rea- sons for adding or removing them; and ‘‘(B) if few or no such persons have been added to that list during that year, the reasons for not add- ing more such persons to the list; and ‘‘(2) efforts by the executive branch to encourage the governments of other countries to impose sanc- tions that are similar to the sanctions imposed under this title.’’ [Memorandum of President of the United States, Apr. 5, 2013, 78 F.R. 22763, delegated the functions conferred upon the President by sections 404(a), 404(b), and 404(d), with respect to the determinations provided for there- in; 404(c)(3); 404(c)(4), consistent with section 404(f); and 406(a)(1) of Pub. L. 112–208, set out above, to the Sec- retary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Sec- retary of State, and delegated the functions and au- thorities in sections 404(a), 404(b), and 404(d), with re- spect to the submission of the list, updates, and reports described in those respective sections, 404(c)(2), 404(e), and 406(a)(2) of Pub. L. 112–208 to the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treas- ury.] BELARUS DEMOCRACY Pub. L. 118–31, div. F, title LXIV, § 6406, Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 999, as amended by Pub. L. 118–159, div. G, title LXXII, § 7205, Dec. 23, 2024, 138 Stat. 2530, provided that: ‘‘(a) SPECIAL ENVOY.—The President shall appoint a Special Envoy for Belarus within the Department [of State] (referred to in this section as the ‘Special Envoy’). The Special Envoy should be a person of recog- nized distinction in the field of European security, geo- politics, democracy and human rights, and may be a ca- reer Foreign Service Officer. ‘‘(b) CENTRAL OBJECTIVE.—The central objective of the Special Envoy is to coordinate and promote ef- forts— ‘‘(1) to improve respect for the fundamental human rights of the people of Belarus; ‘‘(2) to sustain focus on the national security impli- cations of Belarus’s political and military alignment for the United States; and ‘‘(3) to respond to the political, economic, and secu- rity impacts of events in Belarus upon neighboring countries and the wider region. ‘‘(c) DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES.—The Special Envoy shall— ‘‘(1) engage in discussions with Belarusian officials regarding human rights, political, economic and se- curity issues in Belarus; ‘‘(2) support international efforts to promote human rights and political freedoms in Belarus, in- cluding coordination and dialogue between the United States and the United Nations, the Organiza- Page 1701 TITLE 22—FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE § 5811 tion for Security and Cooperation in Europe, the Eu- ropean Union, Belarus, and the other countries in Eastern Europe; ‘‘(3) consult with nongovernmental organizations that have attempted to address human rights and po- litical and economic instability in Belarus; ‘‘(4) make recommendations regarding the funding of activities promoting human rights, democracy, the rule of law, and the development of a market econ- omy in Belarus; ‘‘(5) review strategies for improving protection of human rights in Belarus, including technical training and exchange programs; ‘‘(6) develop an action plan for holding to account the perpetrators of the human rights violations docu- mented in the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights report on the situation of human rights in Belarus in the run-up to the 2020 presi- dential election and its aftermath (Human Rights Council Resolution 49/36 [sic]); ‘‘(7) engage with member countries of the North At- lantic Treaty Organization, the Organization for Se- curity and Cooperation in Europe and the European Union with respect to the implications of Belarus’s political and security alignment for transatlantic se- curity; and ‘‘(8) work within the Department and among partnering countries to sustain focus on the political situation in Belarus. ‘‘(d) ROLE.—The position of Special Envoy— ‘‘(1) shall only exist while United States diplomatic operations in Belarus at the United States Embassy in Minsk, Belarus are suspended; and ‘‘(2) shall oversee the operations and personnel of the Belarus Affairs Unit. ‘‘(e) REPORT ON ACTIVITIES.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this division [Dec. 22, 2023], and annually thereafter for the following 5 years, the Secretary [of State], in consultation with the Spe- cial Envoy, shall submit a report to the appropriate congressional committees [Committee on Foreign Rela- tions of the Senate and Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives] that describes the ac- tivities undertaken pursuant to subsection (c) during the reporting period. ‘‘(f) SUNSET.—The position of Special Envoy for Belarus and the authorities provided by this section shall terminate 5 years after the date of the enactment of this division.’’ Pub. L. 108–347, Oct. 20, 2004, 118 Stat. 1383, as amend- ed by Pub. L. 109–480, §§ 2–4(c)(1), 5–8, Jan. 12, 2007, 120 Stat. 3666–3672; Pub. L. 112–82, §§ 2–6, Jan. 3, 2012, 125 Stat. 1863–1867; Pub. L. 116–260, div. FF, title III, §§ 322–329, Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 3101–3113, provided that: ‘‘SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. ‘‘This Act may be cited as the ‘Belarus Democracy Act of 2004’. ‘‘SEC. 2. FINDINGS. ‘‘Congress finds the following: ‘‘(1) The International Covenant on Civil and Polit- ical Rights, done at New York December 19, 1966, was ratified by Belarus in 1973, guaranteeing Belarusians the freedom of expression and the freedom of associa- tion. ‘‘(2) Alyaksandr Lukashenka has ruled Belarus as an undemocratic dictatorship since the first presi- dential election in Belarus in 1994. ‘‘(3) Subsequent presidential elections in Belarus have been neither free nor fair and have been rejected by the international community as not meeting mini- mal electoral standards, with the jailing of opposi- tion activists frequently used as a tool of government repression before and after the elections. ‘‘(4) In response to the repression and violence dur- ing the 2006 presidential election, Congress passed the Belarus Democracy Reauthorization Act of 2006 (Pub- lic Law 109–480). ‘‘(5) In 2006, President George W. Bush issued Exec- utive Order 13405, titled ‘Blocking Property of Cer- tain Persons Undermining Democratic Processes or Institutions in Belarus’ [listed in a table under sec- tion 1701 of Title 50, War and National Defense], which authorized the imposition of sanctions against persons responsible for— ‘‘(A) undermining democratic processes in Belarus; or ‘‘(B) participating in human rights abuses related to political repression in Belarus. ‘‘(6) In March 2011, the Senate unanimously passed Senate Resolution 105, which— ‘‘(A) condemned the December 2010 election in Belarus as ‘illegitimate, fraudulent, and not rep- resentative of the will or the aspirations of the vot- ers in Belarus’; and ‘‘(B) called on the Lukashenka regime ‘to imme- diately and unconditionally release all political prisoners in Belarus who were arrested in associa- tion with the December 19, 2010, election’. ‘‘(7) The Government of Belarus, led illegally by Alyaksandr Lukashenka, continues to engage in a pattern of clear and persistent violations of human rights and fundamental freedoms. ‘‘(8) The Government of Belarus, led illegally by Alyaksandr Lukashenka, continues to engage in a pattern of clear and uncorrected violations of basic principles of democratic governance, including through a series of fundamentally flawed presidential and parliamentary elections undermining the legit- imacy of executive and legislative authority in that country. ‘‘(9) The Government of Belarus, led illegally by Alyaksandr Lukashenka, continues to subject thou- sands of pro-democracy political activists and peace- ful protesters to harassment, beatings, and imprison- ment, particularly as a result of their attempts to peacefully exercise their right to freedom of assembly and association. ‘‘(10) The Government of Belarus, led illegally by Alyaksandr Lukashenka, continues to suppress inde- pendent media and journalists and to restrict access to the internet, including social media and other dig- ital communication platforms, in violation of the right to freedom of speech and expression of those dissenting from the dictatorship of Alyaksandr Lukashenka. ‘‘(11) The Government of Belarus, led illegally by Alyaksandr Lukashenka, continues a systematic campaign of harassment, repression, and closure of nongovernmental organizations, including inde- pendent trade unions and entrepreneurs, creating a climate of fear that inhibits the development of civil society and social solidarity. ‘‘(12) The Government of Belarus, led illegally by Alyaksandr Lukashenka, has pursued a policy under- mining the country’s sovereignty and independence by making Belarus political, economic, cultural, and societal interests subservient to those of Russia. ‘‘(13) The Government of Belarus, led illegally by Alyaksandr Lukashenka, continues to reduce the independence of Belarus through integration into a so-called ‘Union State’ that is under the control of Russia. ‘‘(14) In advance of the August 2020 presidential elections in Belarus, authorities acting on behalf of President Lukashenka arrested journalists, bloggers, political activists, and opposition leaders, including 3 leading presidential candidates (Syarhey Tsikhanouski, Mikalay Statkevich, and Viktar Babaryka), who were barred from running in the elec- tion by the Central Election Commission of the Re- public of Belarus. ‘‘(15) While the 3 opposition candidates were impris- oned, 2 of their wives and 1 of their campaign man- agers (Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya, Veranika Tsepkala, and Maria Kalesnikava) joined together and ran in place of the candidates. ‘‘(16) Thousands of Belarusian people demonstrated their support for these candidates by attending ral- lies, including 1 rally that included an estimated 63,000 participants. Page 1702 TITLE 22—FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE § 5811 ‘‘(17) On August, 5, 2020, the Senate unanimously passed Senate Resolution 658, which calls for a free, fair, and transparent presidential election in Belarus, including the unimpeded participation of all presi- dential candidates. ‘‘(18) On August 9, 2020, the Government of Belarus conducted a presidential election that— ‘‘(A) was held under undemocratic conditions that did not meet international standards; ‘‘(B) involved government malfeasance and seri- ous irregularities with ballot counting and the re- porting of election results, including— ‘‘(i) early voting ballot stuffing; ‘‘(ii) ballot burning; ‘‘(iii) pressuring poll workers; and ‘‘(iv) removing bags full of ballots by climbing out of windows; ‘‘(C) included restrictive measures that impeded the work of local independent observers and did not provide sufficient notice to the OSCE [Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe] to allow for the OSCE to monitor the elections, as is cus- tomary. ‘‘(19) Incumbent president Alyaksandr Lukashenka declared a landslide victory in the election and claimed to have received more than 80 percent of the votes cast in the election. ‘‘(20) The leading opposition candidate, Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya— ‘‘(A) formally disputed the government’s reported election results; ‘‘(B) explained that her staff had examined the election results from more than 50 polling places; and ‘‘(C) found that her share of the vote exceeded Lukashenka’s share by many times. ‘‘(21) On August 10, 2020, Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya was detained while attending a meeting with the Cen- tral Election Commission of the Republic of Belarus and forced to flee to Lithuania under pressure from government authorities. ‘‘(22) On August 11, 2020, Lithuanian Foreign Min- ister Linas Linkevicˇius announced that Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya was safe in Lithuania and has con- tinued to be one of the strongest voices supporting the pro-democracy movement in Belarus within the European Union and globally. ‘‘(23) On August 18, 2020, Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya announced the formation of a Coordination Council to oversee a resolution to the crisis in Belarus and a peaceful transition of power by subjecting the Coun- cil’s senior members to violence, detention, and forced exile. The Government of Belarus, led illegally by Alyaksandr Lukashenka, has sought to stop the work of the Coordination Council. ‘‘(24) Before the European Parliament on August 25, 2020, Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya stressed that a ‘peaceful revolution’ was underway in Belarus, and that ‘It is neither a pro-Russian nor anti-Russian rev- olution. It is neither an anti-European Union nor a pro-European Union revolution. It is a democratic revolution.’. ‘‘(25) On or around September 6, 2020, opposition leader Maria Kalesnikava and members of the Coordi- nation Council, including Anton Ronenkov, Ivan Kravtsov, and Maxim Bogretsov, were detained by au- thorities who sought to forcibly expel them to Ukraine. Ms. Kalesnikava tore up her passport at the Ukrainian border in a successful effort to prevent this expulsion, subsequently disappeared, and was discovered in a Minsk prison on September 9, 2020. ‘‘(26) On August 11, 2020, the European Union High Representative for Foreign and Security Policy, Josep Borrell, issued a declaration on the presi- dential election in Belarus stating that the elections were neither free nor fair. ‘‘(27) On August 28, 2020, United States Deputy Sec- retary of State Stephen Biegun declared that the Au- gust 9th election in Belarus was fraudulent. ‘‘(28) Following Alyaksandr Lukashenka’s Sep- tember 23, 2020, secret inauguration, the United States, the European Union, numerous European Union member states, the United Kingdom, and Can- ada announced that they did not recognize Mr. Lukashenka as the legitimately elected leader of Belarus. ‘‘(29) Since the sham election on August 9, 2020, tens of thousands of Belarusian citizens have participated in daily peaceful protests calling for a new, free, and fair election, and the release of political prisoners. ‘‘(30) According to Amnesty International, on Au- gust 30, 2020, Belarusians held one of the largest pro- test rallies in the country’s modern history in Minsk and in other cities, which was attended by at least 100,000 people who demanded the resignation of Presi- dent Lukashenka and an investigation into the human rights violations in Belarus. ‘‘(31) Women have served as the leading force in demonstrations across the country, protesting the police brutality and mass detentions by wearing white, carrying flowers, forming ‘solidarity chains’, and unmasking undercover police trying to arrest demonstrators. ‘‘(32) The Government of Belarus has responded to the peaceful opposition protests, which are the larg- est in Belarus history, with a violent crackdown, in- cluding, according to the United Nations Special Rapporteur, the detention by government authorities of more than 10,000 peaceful protestors as of Sep- tember 18, 2020, mostly for taking part in or observ- ing peaceful protests, with many of these arrests fol- lowed by beatings and torture at the hands of Belarusian law enforcement. ‘‘(33) According to the Viasna Human Rights Cen- tre, at least 450 detainees have reported being tor- tured or otherwise ill-treated while held in incommu- nicado detention for up to 10 days, including through— ‘‘(A) severe beatings; ‘‘(B) forced performance of humiliating acts; and ‘‘(C) sexual violence and other forms of violence. ‘‘(34) At least 4 Belarusians have been killed at pro- tests, and dozens of Belarusians who were detained during the protests are still missing. ‘‘(35) The Belarus Ministry of Defense threatened to send the army to confront protestors, warning that in case of any violation of peace and order in areas around national monuments, ‘you will have the army to deal with now, not the police’. ‘‘(36) The Government of Belarus, led illegally by Alyaksandr Lukashenka, has consistently restricted the free flow of information to silence the opposition and to conceal the regime’s violent crackdown on peaceful protestors, including by— ‘‘(A) stripping the accreditation of journalists from major foreign news outlets; ‘‘(B) detaining and harassing countless journal- ists. ‘‘(C) arresting dozens of journalists, 6 of whom re- port for Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty; ‘‘(D) halting the publishing of 2 independent newspapers; and ‘‘(E) disrupting internet access; ‘‘(F) blocking more than 50 news websites that were covering the protests; and ‘‘(G) limiting access to social media and other digital communication platforms. ‘‘(37) Internet access in Belarus has been repeatedly disrupted and restricted since August 9, 2020, which independent experts and monitoring groups have at- tributed to government interference. ‘‘(38) Thousands of employees at Belarusian state- owned enterprises, who have been seen as Alyaksandr Lukashenka’s traditional base during his 26-year rule, went on strike across the country to protest Lukashenka’s illegitimate election and the subse- quent crackdowns, including at some of Belarus’s largest factories such as the BelAZ truck plant, the Minsk Tractor Works, and the Minsk Automobile Plant. ‘‘(39) After the employees of state media outlets walked off the job in protest rather than help report Page 1703 TITLE 22—FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE § 5811 misleading government propaganda, Lukashenka confirmed that he ‘asked the Russians’ to send teams of Russian journalists to replace local employees. ‘‘(40) On August 19, 2020, European Council Presi- dent Charles Michel announced that the European Union would impose sanctions on a substantial num- ber of individuals responsible for violence, repression, and election fraud in Belarus. ‘‘(41) On October 2, 2020, the Department of Treas- ury announced new sanctions under Executive Order 13405 on eight individuals ‘for their roles in the fraud- ulent August 9, 2020 Belarus presidential election or the subsequent violent crackdown on peaceful pro- testers’. ‘‘(42) Similar sanctions have also been applied to Belarusian human rights violators by the Govern- ment of Canada and the Government of the United Kingdom. ‘‘(43) Against the will of the majority of the Belarusian people— ‘‘(A) Alyaksandr Lukashenka appealed to Russian President Vladimir Putin to provide security as- sistance to his government, if requested; and ‘‘(B) President Putin has agreed to prop up the Alyaksandr Lukashenka regime by— ‘‘(i) confirming that a Russian police force was ready to be deployed if ‘the situation gets out of control’; ‘‘(ii) providing significant financial support; and ‘‘(iii) sending Russian propagandists to help dis- seminate pro-regime propaganda on Belarus state television. ‘‘(44) The Governments of the United States, the European Union, the United Kingdom, and Canada have— ‘‘(A) condemned the violent crackdown on peace- ful protestors; ‘‘(B) refused to accept the results of the fraudu- lent election; and ‘‘(C) called for new free and fair elections under independent observation. ‘‘SEC. 3. STATEMENT OF POLICY. ‘‘It is the policy of the United States— ‘‘(1) to condemn— ‘‘(A) the conduct of the August 9, 2020, presi- dential election in Belarus, which was neither free nor fair; ‘‘(B) the Belarusian authorities’ unrelenting crackdown on, arbitrary arrests of, and violence against opposition candidates, peaceful protestors, human rights activists, employees from state- owned enterprises participating in strikes, inde- pendent election observers, and independent jour- nalists and bloggers; and ‘‘(C) the unjustified detention and forced or at- tempted expulsion of members of the Coordination Council in Belarus; ‘‘(2) to continue demanding the immediate release without preconditions of all political prisoners in Belarus and those arrested for peacefully protesting, including all those individuals detained in connection with the August 9, 2020, presidential election; ‘‘(3) to stand in solidarity with the people of Belarus, including human rights defenders, bloggers, and journalists, who are exercising their right to freedom of assembly, freedom of expression, and rule of law and to continue supporting the aspirations of the people of Belarus for democracy, human rights, and the rule of law; ‘‘(4) to continue actively supporting the aspirations of the people of the Republic of Belarus— ‘‘(A) to preserve the independence and sov- ereignty of their country; and ‘‘(B) to freely exercise their religion, including the head of the Catholic Church in Belarus, Arch- bishop Tadeusz Kondrusiewicz, who was barred from entering the country after criticizing Belarusian authorities; ‘‘(5) to recognize the leading role of women in the peaceful protests and pro-democracy movement in Belarus; ‘‘(6) to continue— ‘‘(A) rejecting the invalid results of the fraudu- lent August 9, 2020 presidential election in Belarus announced by the Central Election Commission of the Republic of Belarus; and ‘‘(B) supporting calls for new presidential and parliamentary elections, conducted in a manner that is free and fair according to OSCE standards and under the supervision of OSCE observers and independent domestic observers; ‘‘(7) to refuse to recognize Alyaksandr Lukashenka as the legitimately elected leader of Belarus; ‘‘(8) to not recognize any incorporation of Belarus into a ‘Union State’ with Russia, since this so-called ‘Union State’ would be both an attempt to absorb Belarus and a step to reconstituting the totalitarian Soviet Union; ‘‘(9) to continue calling for the fulfillment by the Government of Belarus of Belarus’s freely undertaken obligations as an OSCE participating state and as a signatory of the Charter of the United Nations; ‘‘(10) to support an OSCE role in mediating a dia- logue within Belarus between the government and genuine representatives of Belarusian society; ‘‘(11) to recognize the Coordination Council as a le- gitimate institution to participate in a dialogue on a peaceful transition of power; ‘‘(12) to applaud the commitment by foreign dip- lomats in Minsk to engage with Coordination Council member and Nobel Laureate, Svetlana Alexievich, and to encourage an ongoing dialogue with her and with other leaders of the democratically-oriented po- litical opposition in Belarus; ‘‘(13) to urge an expanded United States diplomatic presence in Belarus to advocate for the aspirations of the people of Belarus for democracy, human rights, and the rule of law; ‘‘(14) to encourage the United States Government— ‘‘(A) to continue working closely with the Euro- pean Union, the United Kingdom, Canada, and other countries and international organizations to promote the principles of democracy, the rule of law, and human rights in Belarus; and ‘‘(B) to impose targeted sanctions, in coordina- tion with the European Union and other inter- national partners, against officials in Belarus who are responsible for— ‘‘(i) undermining democratic processes in Belarus; or ‘‘(ii) participating in human rights abuses re- lated to political repression in Belarus; ‘‘(15) to call on the Government of Belarus to up- hold its human rights obligations, including those rights enumerated in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; and ‘‘(16) to support— ‘‘(A) the continued territorial integrity of Belarus; and ‘‘(B) the right of the Belarusian people to deter- mine their future. ‘‘SEC. 4. ASSISTANCE TO PROMOTE DEMOCRACY, CIVIL SOCIETY, AND SOVEREIGNTY IN BELARUS. ‘‘(a) PURPOSES OF ASSISTANCE.—The assistance under this section shall be available for the following pur- poses: ‘‘(1) To assist the people of the Republic of Belarus in their pursuit of freedom, democracy, and human rights and in their aspiration to join the Trans-At- lantic community of democracies. ‘‘(2) To assist the people of Belarus in building the sovereignty and independence of their country. ‘‘(3) To encourage free, fair, and transparent presi- dential, parliamentary, and local elections in Belarus, conducted in a manner consistent with internationally accepted standards and under the su- Page 1704 TITLE 22—FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE § 5811 pervision of internationally recognized observers and independent domestic observers. ‘‘(4) To assist in the development of a democratic political culture and civil society in Belarus. ‘‘(b) AUTHORIZATION FOR ASSISTANCE.—To carry out the purposes of subsection (a), the President is author- ized to furnish assistance and other support for the ac- tivities described in subsection (c), to be provided pri- marily for indigenous Belarusian groups and Belarusian groups outside of Belarus that are committed to the support of democratic processes and Belarusian sov- ereignty. ‘‘(c) ACTIVITIES SUPPORTED.—Activities that may be supported by assistance under subsection (b) include— ‘‘(1) expanding independent radio and television broadcasting to and within Belarus; ‘‘(2) facilitating the development of independent broadcast, print, and Internet media working within Belarus and from locations outside the country and supported by nonstate-controlled printing facilities; ‘‘(3) countering internet censorship and repressive surveillance technology that seek to limit free asso- ciation, control access to information, and prevent citizens from exercising their rights to free speech; ‘‘(4) aiding the development of civil society through assistance to nongovernmental organizations pro- moting democracy and supporting human rights, in- cluding youth groups, entrepreneurs, and independent trade unions; ‘‘(5) supporting the work of human rights defenders; ‘‘(6) enhancing the development of democratic po- litical parties; ‘‘(7) assisting the promotion of free, fair, and trans- parent electoral processes; ‘‘(8) enhancing international exchanges and ad- vanced professional training programs for leaders and members of the democratic forces in skill areas cen- tral to the development of civil society; ‘‘(9) supporting the work of women advocating free- dom, human rights, and human progress; ‘‘(10) supporting the development of Belarusian lan- guage education; ‘‘(11) enhancing the development of the private sec- tor, particularly the information technology sector, and its role in the economy of Belarus, including by increasing the capacity of private sector actors, de- veloping business support organizations, offering en- trepreneurship training, and expanding access to fi- nance for small and medium enterprises; ‘‘(12) supporting political refugees in neighboring European countries fleeing the crackdown in Belarus; ‘‘(13) supporting the gathering of evidence on and investigating of the human rights abuses in Belarus; ‘‘(14) supporting the public health response, includ- ing filling the information void, in Belarus during the COVID–19 pandemic; and ‘‘(15) other activities consistent with the purposes of this Act. ‘‘(d) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that, in light of the political crisis in Belarus and the unprecedented mobilization of the Belarusian people, United States foreign assistance to Belarusian civil so- ciety should be reevaluated and increased— ‘‘(1) to carry out the purposes described in sub- section (a); and ‘‘(2) to include the activities described in sub- section (c). ‘‘(e) COORDINATION WITH EUROPEAN PARTNERS.—In order to maximize impact, eliminate duplication, and further the achievement of the purposes described in subsection (a), the Secretary of State shall ensure co- ordination with the European Union and its institu- tions, the governments of countries that are members of the European Union, the United Kingdom, and Can- ada. ‘‘(f) REPORT ON ASSISTANCE.—Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of the Belarus Democ- racy, Human Rights, and Sovereignty Act of 2020 [Dec. 27, 2020], the Secretary of State, acting through the Of- fice of the Coordinator of U.S. Assistance to Europe and Eurasia, and in coordination with the Adminis- trator of the United States Agency for International Development, shall submit a report to the appropriate congressional committees describing the programs and activities carried out to achieve the purposes described in subsection (a), including an assessment of whether or not progress was made in achieving those purposes. ‘‘(g) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There are authorized to be appropriated to the President to carry out this section such sums as may be necessary for each of the fiscal years 2021 and 2022. ‘‘SEC. 5. INTERNATIONAL BROADCASTING, INTER- NET FREEDOM, AND ACCESS TO INFORMATION IN BELARUS. ‘‘(a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that— ‘‘(1) the President should support and reallocate re- sources to radio, television, and internet broad- casting conducted by Radio Free Europe/Radio Lib- erty in languages spoken in Belarus; ‘‘(2) the United States should also support other independent media providing objective information to the Belarusian people, particularly in the Belarusian language; ‘‘(3) the President should provide the United States Agency for Global Media with a surge capacity (as such term is defined in section 316 of the United States International Broadcasting Act [of 1994] (22 U.S.C. 6216)) for programs and activities in Belarus; ‘‘(4) the Chief Executive Officer of the United States Agency for Global Media, working through the Open Technology Fund and in coordination with the Secretary of State, should expand and prioritize ef- forts to provide anti-censorship technology and serv- ices to journalists and civil society in Belarus in order to enhance their ability to safely access or share digital news and information without fear of re- percussions or surveillance; and ‘‘(5) the United States should continue to condemn the Belarusian authorities’ crackdown on inde- pendent media, including the harassment and mass detentions of independent and foreign journalists and the denial of accreditation. ‘‘(b) STRATEGY TO PROMOTE EXPANDED BROADCASTING, INTERNET FREEDOM, AND ACCESS TO INFORMATION IN BELARUS.— ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of the Belarus Democracy, Human Rights, and Sovereignty Act of 2020 [Dec. 27, 2020], the Chief Executive Officer of the United States Agency for Global Media and the Secretary of State shall jointly submit to the appropriate congressional committees a comprehensive strategy, including a cost estimate, to carry out the following: ‘‘(A) Expand independent radio, television, live stream, and social network broadcasting and com- munications in Belarus to provide news and infor- mation, particularly in the Belarusian language, that is credible, comprehensive, and accurate. ‘‘(B) Support the development and use of anti- censorship and circumvention technologies by the Open Technology Fund and the Bureau of Democ- racy Human Rights and Labor that enable the citi- zens of Belarus to communicate securely and under- take internet activities without interference from the Government of Belarus. ‘‘(C) Assist efforts to overcome attempts by the Government of Belarus to disrupt internet access and block content online. ‘‘(D) Monitor the cooperation of the Government of Belarus with any foreign government or organi- zation for purposes related to the censorship or sur- veillance of the internet, including an assessment of any such cooperation in the preceding ten years. ‘‘(E) Monitor the purchase or receipt by the Gov- ernment of Belarus of any technology or training from any foreign government or organization for purposes related to the censorship or surveillance of the internet, including an assessment of any such purchase or receipt in the preceding ten years. Page 1705 TITLE 22—FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE § 5811 ‘‘(F) Assist with the protection of journalists who have been targeted for free speech activities, in- cluding through the denial of accreditation. ‘‘(G) Provide cyber-attack mitigation services to civil society organizations in Belarus. ‘‘(H) Provide resources for educational materials and training on digital literacy, bypassing internet censorship, digital safety, and investigative and an- alytical journalism for independent journalists working in Belarus. ‘‘(I) Build the capacity of civil society, media, and other nongovernmental and organizations to identify, track, and counter disinformation, includ- ing from proxies of the Government of Russia work- ing at Belarusian state television. ‘‘(2) FORM.—The report required under paragraph (1) shall be transmitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex. ‘‘SEC. 6. SANCTIONS AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT OF BELARUS. ‘‘(a) APPLICATION OF SANCTIONS.—The sanctions de- scribed in subsections (c) through (f) should apply with respect to the Republic of Belarus until the President determines and certifies to the appropriate congres- sional committees that the Government of Belarus has made significant progress in meeting the conditions de- scribed in subsection (b). ‘‘(b) CONDITIONS.—The conditions referred to in sub- section (a) are the following: ‘‘(1) The release of individuals in Belarus who have been jailed based on political or religious beliefs or expression, including those individuals jailed based on political beliefs or expression in connection with repression that attended the presidential election of August 9, 2020. ‘‘(2) The withdrawal of politically motivated legal charges against all opposition activists, peaceful pro- testers, and independent journalists in Belarus, in- cluding politically motivated legal charges made in connection with repression that attended the presi- dential election of August 9, 2020. ‘‘(3) The cessation of all forms of harassment and repression against the independent media, inde- pendent trade unions, nongovernmental organiza- tions, youth groups, religious organizations (includ- ing their leadership and members), and the political opposition in Belarus. ‘‘(4) The prosecution of senior leadership of the Government of Belarus responsible for the adminis- tration of fraudulent elections and violations of human rights, including violations of human rights committed in connection with the presidential elec- tion of August 9, 2020. ‘‘(5) The holding of free, fair and transparent presi- dential and parliamentary elections in Belarus con- sistent with OSCE standards and under the super- vision of OSCE observers and independent domestic observers. ‘‘(c) DENIAL OF ENTRY INTO THE UNITED STATES OF SENIOR LEADERSHIP OF THE GOVERNMENT OF BELARUS AND RUSSIAN INDIVIDUALS COMPLICIT IN THE CRACKDOWN THAT OCCURRED AFTER THE AUGUST 9, 2020, ELECTION.— Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Presi- dent may exercise the authority under section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(f)) to deny the entry into the United States of any alien who— ‘‘(1) holds a position in the senior leadership of the Government of Belarus; ‘‘(2) is an immediate family member of a person in- admissible under paragraph (1); ‘‘(3) through his or her business dealings with sen- ior leadership of the Government of Belarus derives significant financial benefit from policies or actions, including electoral fraud, human rights abuses, or corruption, that undermine or injure democratic in- stitutions or impede the transition to democracy in Belarus; ‘‘(4) is a member of the Central Election Commis- sion of Belarus or assisted the Commission in manip- ulating the presidential election of August 9, 2020; ‘‘(5) is a member of any branch of the security or law enforcement services of Belarus, including the KGB, Interior Ministry, and OMON special police unit, and is responsible for, or complicit in, ordering, controlling, materially assisting, sponsoring, or pro- viding financial, material, or technological support for, or otherwise directing, the crackdown on opposi- tion leaders, journalists, and peaceful protestors that occurred in connection with the presidential election of August 9, 2020; or [sic] ‘‘(6) is a member of any branch of the security or law enforcement services of Belarus and has partici- pated in the persecution or harassment of religious groups, human rights defenders, democratic opposi- tion groups, or independent media or journalists.[;] ‘‘(7) is a government official, including at the Infor- mation Ministry, responsible for the crackdown on independent media, including revoking the accredita- tion of journalists, disrupting internet access, and re- stricting online content; ‘‘(8) is an official in the so-called ‘Union State’ be- tween Russia and Belarus (regardless of nationality of the individual); or ‘‘(9) is a Russian individual that has significantly participated in the crackdown on independent press or human rights abuses related to political repression in Belarus, including the Russian propagandists sent to replace local employees at Belarusian state media outlets. ‘‘(d) PROHIBITION ON LOANS AND INVESTMENT.— ‘‘(1) UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT FINANCING.—It is the sense of Congress that no loan, credit guarantee, insurance, financing, or other similar financial as- sistance should be extended by any agency of the Government of the United States (including the Ex- port-Import Bank of the United States and the United States International Development Finance Corporation) to the Government of Belarus, except with respect to the provision of humanitarian goods and agricultural or medical products. ‘‘(2) TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT AGENCY.—It is the sense of Congress that no funds available to the Trade and Development Agency should be available for activities of the Agency in or for Belarus. ‘‘(e) MULTILATERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE.—The Sec- retary of the Treasury should instruct the United States Executive Director at each international finan- cial institution of which the United States is a member to use the voice and vote of the United States to oppose any extension by those institutions of any financial as- sistance to the Government of Belarus, except for loans and assistance that serve humanitarian needs. ‘‘(f) BLOCKING OF ASSETS AND OTHER PROHIBITED AC- TIVITIES.— ‘‘(1) BLOCKING OF ASSETS.—It is the sense of Con- gress that the President should block all property and interests in property, including all commercial, industrial, or public utility undertakings or entities, that, on or after the date of the enactment of the Belarus Democracy Reauthorization Act of 2006 [Jan. 12, 2007]— ‘‘(A) are owned, in whole or in part, by the Gov- ernment of Belarus, or by the senior leadership of the Government of Belarus or by any member or family member closely linked to the senior leader- ship of the Government of Belarus, or an official of the so-called ‘Union State’ with Russia, or any per- son who through his or her business dealings with senior leadership of the Government of Belarus de- rives significant financial benefit from policies or actions, including electoral fraud, human rights abuses, or corruption, that undermine or injure democratic institutions or impede the transition to democracy in Belarus; and ‘‘(B) are in the United States, or in the possession or control of the Government of the United States or of any United States financial institution, in- cluding any branch or office of such financial insti- tution that is located outside the United States. ‘‘(2) PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES.—Activities prohibited by reason of the blocking of property and interests in property under paragraph (1) should include— Page 1706 TITLE 22—FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE § 5811 ‘‘(A) payments or transfers of any property, or any transactions involving the transfer of anything of economic value by any United States person, to the Government of Belarus, to any person or entity acting for or on behalf of, or owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by that government, or to any member of the senior leadership of the Govern- ment of Belarus, or an official of the so-called ‘Union State’ with Russia; ‘‘(B) the export or reexport to any entity owned, controlled, or operated by the Government of Belarus, or the so-called ‘Union State’ with Russia,, [sic] directly or indirectly, of any goods, tech- nology, or services, either— ‘‘(i) by a United States person; or ‘‘(ii) involving the use of any air carrier or a vessel documented under the laws of the United States; and ‘‘(C) the performance by any United States person of any contract, including a contract providing a loan or other financing, in support of an industrial, commercial, or public utility operated, controlled, or owned by the Government of Belarus. ‘‘(3) PAYMENT OF EXPENSES.—All expenses incident to the blocking and maintenance of property blocked under paragraph (1) should be charged to the owners or operators of such property. Such expenses may not be paid from blocked funds. ‘‘(4) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this sub- section shall be construed to prohibit any contract or other financial transaction with any private or non- governmental organization or business in Belarus. ‘‘(5) EXCEPTIONS.—Paragraphs (1) and (2) do not apply to— ‘‘(A) assistance authorized under section 4 or 5 of this Act; or ‘‘(B) medicine, medical equipment or supplies, food, as well as any other form of humanitarian as- sistance provided to Belarus as relief in response to a humanitarian crisis. ‘‘(6) PENALTIES.—Any person who violates any pro- hibition or restriction imposed under this subsection should be subject to the penalties under section 6 [206] of the International Emergency Economic Pow- ers Act (50 U.S.C. 1705) to the same extent as for a violation under that Act [50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.]. ‘‘(7) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection: ‘‘(A) AIR CARRIER.—The term ‘air carrier’ has the meaning given that term in section 40102 of title 49, United States Code. ‘‘(B) UNITED STATES PERSON.—The term ‘United States person’ means— ‘‘(i) any United States citizen or alien admitted for permanent residence to the United States; ‘‘(ii) any entity organized under the laws of the United States; and ‘‘(iii) any person in the United States. ‘‘SEC. 7. MULTILATERAL COOPERATION. ‘‘It is the sense of Congress that the President should continue to coordinate with the European Union and its institutions, European Union member states, the United Kingdom, and Canada to develop a comprehen- sive, multilateral strategy— ‘‘(1) to further the purposes of this Act, including, as appropriate, encouraging other countries to take measures with respect to the Republic of Belarus that are similar to measures described in this Act; and ‘‘(2) to deter the Government of the Russian Fed- eration from undermining democratic processes and institutions in Belarus or threatening the independ- ence, sovereignty, and territorial integrity of Belarus. ‘‘SEC. 8. REPORTS. ‘‘(a) REPORT ON THREAT TO SOVEREIGNTY AND INDE- PENDENCE OF BELARUS.— ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of the Belarus Democracy, Human Rights, and Sovereignty Act of 2020 [Dec. 27, 2020], the Secretary of State, in coordination with the Director of National Intelligence and the Secretary of the Treasury, shall transmit to the appropriate congressional committees a report describing the threat that the Government of Russia poses to the sovereignty and independence of Belarus. ‘‘(2) MATTERS TO BE INCLUDED.—The report required under paragraph (1) shall include— ‘‘(A) an assessment of how the Government of Russia is exploiting the current political crisis in Belarus to push for deeper political and economic control of or integration with Belarus; ‘‘(B) a description of the economic and energy as- sets in Belarus that the Government of Russia, in- cluding Russian state-owned or state-controlled companies, controls; ‘‘(C) a description of Belarus major enterprises that are vulnerable of being taken over by Russian entities amid the country’s worsening financial cri- sis; ‘‘(D) a description of how and to what ends the Government of Russia seeks to augment its mili- tary presence in Belarus; ‘‘(E) a description of Russian influence over the media and information space in Belarus and how the Government of Russia uses disinformation and other malign techniques to undermine Belarusian history, culture, and language; ‘‘(F) a description of other actors in Belarus that the Government of Russia uses to advance its ma- lign influence, including veterans’ organizations and extrajudicial networks; ‘‘(G) a description of efforts to undermine Belarusian language, cultural, and national sym- bols, including the traditional red and white flag and the ‘Pahonia’ mounted knight; and ‘‘(H) the identification of Russian individuals and government agencies that are significantly sup- porting or involved in the crackdown on peaceful protestors and the opposition or the repression of independent media following the August 9, 2020, presidential election. ‘‘(3) FORM.—The report required under this sub- section shall be transmitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex. ‘‘(b) REPORT ON PERSONAL ASSETS OF ALYAKSANDR LUKASHENKA.— ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of the Belarus Democracy, Human Rights, and Sovereignty Act of 2020 [Dec. 27, 2020], the Director of National Intelligence, in con- sultation with the Secretary of the Treasury and the Secretary of State, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report describing— ‘‘(A) the total assets under the direct or indirect control of Alyaksandr Lukashenka, including esti- mated assets and known sources of income of Alyaksandr Lukashenka and his immediate family members, including assets, investments, bank ac- counts, and other business interests; and ‘‘(B) an identification of the most significant sen- ior foreign political figures in Belarus, as deter- mined by their closeness to Alyaksandr Lukashenka. ‘‘(2) WAIVER.—The Director of National Intelligence may waive, in whole or in part, the reporting require- ment under paragraph (1)(A) if the Director submits to the appropriate congressional committees— ‘‘(A) a written justification stating that the waiv- er is in the national interest of the United States; and ‘‘(B) a detailed explanation of the reasons there- for. ‘‘(3) FORM.—The report required under this sub- section shall be transmitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex. ‘‘SEC. 9. DEFINITIONS. ‘‘In this Act: ‘‘(1) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES.—The term ‘appropriate congressional committees’ means— Page 1707 TITLE 22—FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE § 5812 ‘‘(A) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; ‘‘(B) the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate; ‘‘(C) the Committee on Appropriations of the Sen- ate; ‘‘(D) the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives; ‘‘(E) the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives; and ‘‘(F) the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives. ‘‘(2) OSCE.—The term ‘OSCE’ means the Organiza- tion for Security and Cooperation in Europe. ‘‘(3) SENIOR LEADERSHIP OF THE GOVERNMENT OF BELARUS.—The term ‘senior leadership of the Govern- ment of Belarus’ includes— ‘‘(A) the President, Prime Minister, Deputy Prime Ministers, government ministers, Chairmen of State Committees, governors, heads of state en- terprises, and members of the Presidential Admin- istration of Belarus; ‘‘(B) any official of the Government of Belarus who— ‘‘(i) is personally and substantially involved in the suppression of freedom in Belarus, including judges, prosecutors, members of the security and intelligence services, and heads of professional as- sociations and educational institutions; or ‘‘(ii) is otherwise engaged in public corruption, electoral fraud, online censorship, or restrictions on independent media and journalists in Belarus; and ‘‘(C) any other individual determined by the Sec- retary of State (or the Secretary’s designee) to be personally and substantially involved in the formu- lation or execution of the policies of the Govern- ment of Belarus that are in contradiction of inter- nationally recognized human rights standards.’’ [Pub. L. 109–480, § 4(c)(2), Jan. 12, 2007, 120 Stat. 3668, provided that: ‘‘The amendment made by paragraph (1) [amending section 4(d)(1) of Pub. L. 108–347, set out in the note above] shall not be construed to affect the availability of funds appropriated pursuant to the au- thorization of appropriations under section 4(d) of the Belarus Democracy Act of 2004 [Pub. L. 108–347] (as re- designated) before the date of the enactment of this Act [Jan. 12, 2007].’’] PRESIDENTIAL REPORT ON FUNDING FOR NEW INDEPENDENT STATES OF FORMER SOVIET UNION Pub. L. 103–306, title II, Aug. 23, 1994, 108 Stat. 1617, provided in part that: ‘‘(o) The report required by sub- section (d) under the heading ‘Assistance for the New Independent States of the Former Soviet Union’, con- tained in Public Law 102–391 [set out below], shall be updated at least annually and shall also contain a list- ing of all grants and contracts issued from funds appro- priated annually for the new independent states of the former Soviet Union, to include for each grant and con- tract (1) a description of its purpose, (2) its amount, and (3) the country where the grant or contract funds are to be expended.’’ Pub. L. 102–391, title III, Oct. 6, 1992, 106 Stat. 1650, provided in part that: ‘‘(d) REPORTS.—The President shall submit a report to the Committees on Appropria- tions containing the amount of funds obligated and ex- pended for each project and subproject funded from amounts appropriated under this heading for the new independent states of the former Soviet Union. The re- port required by this subsection shall be submitted to the Committees on Appropriations no later than Janu- ary 1, 1993, and an update of this report shall be sub- mitted by the President to those Committees no later than July 1, 1993.’’ § 5812. Program coordination, implementation, and oversight (a) Coordination The President shall designate, within the De- partment of State, a coordinator who shall be responsible for— (1) designing an overall assistance and eco- nomic cooperation strategy for the inde- pendent states of the former Soviet Union; (2) ensuring program and policy coordina- tion among agencies of the United States Gov- ernment in carrying out the policies set forth in this Act (including the amendments made by this Act and chapter 12 of part I of the For- eign Assistance Act of 1961 [22 U.S.C. 2296 et seq.]); (3) pursuing coordination with other coun- tries and international organizations with re- spect to assistance to independent states; (4) ensuring that United States assistance programs for the independent states are con- sistent with this Act (including the amend- ments made by this Act and chapter 12 of part I of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 [22 U.S.C. 2296 et seq.]); (5) ensuring proper management, implemen- tation, and oversight by agencies responsible for assistance programs for the independent states; and (6) resolving policy and program disputes among United States Government agencies with respect to United States assistance for the independent states. (b) Export promotion activities Consistent with subsection (a), coordination of activities related to the promotion of exports of United States goods and services to the inde- pendent states of the former Soviet Union shall continue to be primarily the responsibility of the Secretary of Commerce, in the Secretary’s role as Chair of the Trade Promotion Coordina- tion Committee. (c) International economic activities Consistent with subsection (a), coordination of activities relating to United States participa- tion in international financial institutions and relating to organization of multilateral efforts aimed at currency stabilization, currency con- vertibility, debt reduction, and comprehensive economic reform programs shall continue to be primarily the responsibility of the Secretary of the Treasury, in the Secretary’s role as Chair of the National Advisory Council on International Monetary and Financial Policies and as the United States Governor of the international fi- nancial institutions. (d) Accountability for funds Any agency managing and implementing an assistance program for the independent states of the former Soviet Union shall be accountable for any funds made available to it for such program. (Pub. L. 102–511, title I, § 102, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3322; Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, § 1000(a)(2) [title V, § 596(c)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1535, 1501A–126.)

Cross-references

Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

22 U.S.C. § 1961 — Economic assistance

The President is authorized to cooperate with and assist any nation or group of nations in the general area of the Middle East desiring such assistance in the development of economic strength dedicated to the maintenance of national independence.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 22 U.S.C. § 1961

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 22 U.S.C. § 1961. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

22 U.S.C. § 1961 — Economic assistance

Page 485 TITLE 22—FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE § 1961 AMENDMENTS 1963—Pub. L. 88–205 substituted ‘‘$680,000,000’’ for ‘‘$500,000,000’’. Executive Documents DELEGATION OF FUNCTIONS For delegation of certain functions of President under this section, see Memorandum of President of the United States, May 30, 2001, 66 F.R. 30629, set out as a note under section 1942 of this title. § 1944. Reconstruction assistance in Chile; au- thorization of appropriations There is authorized to be appropriated to the President not to exceed $100,000,000, which shall remain available until expended, for use, in ad- dition to other funds available for such pur- poses, in the reconstruction and rehabilitation of Chile on such terms and conditions as the President may specify. (Pub. L. 86–735, § 3, Sept. 8, 1960, 74 Stat. 870.) Editorial Notes CODIFICATION This section was not enacted as part of the Mutual Security Act of 1954 which comprises this chapter. Executive Documents DELEGATION OF FUNCTIONS For delegation of certain functions of President under this section, see Memorandum of President of the United States, May 30, 2001, 66 F.R. 30629, set out as a note under section 1942 of this title. § 1945. Utilization of funds for assistance in Latin America; availability for transportation of immigrants from Ryukyuan Archipelago (a) Funds appropriated under sections 1943 and 1944 of this title may be used for assistance under sections 1942 to 1945 of this title pursuant to such provisions applicable to the furnishing of such assistance contained in any successor Act to the Mutual Security Act of 1954, as amended, as the President determines to be nec- essary to carry out the purposes for which such funds are appropriated. (b) Of the funds appropriated unde

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 22 U.S.C. § 1961

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 22 U.S.C. § 1961. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

22 U.S.C. § 286aa — Focus on low-income areas of Latin America and Caribbean

The Secretary of the Treasury shall direct the United States Executive Director of the Bank to use the voice and vote of the United States to support an increased focus on the poorest countries in Latin America and the Caribbean, and on poorer areas of better off countries, and to support programs conducted by the Multilateral Investment Fund, particularly in targeting low-income countries and populations, working with nongovernmental organizations and training and assisting former combatants from civil conflicts in Latin America.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 22 U.S.C. § 286aa

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 22 U.S.C. § 286aa. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

22 U.S.C. § 286aa — Instructions to United States Executive

Page 190 TITLE 22—FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE § 286z (2) instruct the United States Executive Di- rector of the Fund to work for adoption of policies in the Fund, both within the frame- work of article IV (of the Articles of Agree- ment of the Fund) consultations and with re- spect to the conditions associated with Fund- supported balance of payments adjustments programs, which promote conditions contrib- uting to the stability of exchange rates and avoid the manipulation of exchange rates be- tween major currencies. Among other initia- tives, the Secretary of the Treasury shall pro- pose strengthening the article IV consultation procedures of the Fund to attempt to ensure that countries which are artificially maintain- ing undervalued or overvalued rates of ex- change agree to adopt market determined ex- change rates. (b) In determining his vote on extensions of assistance to any Fund borrower, the United States Executive Director of the Fund shall take into account whether such borrower’s poli- cies are consistent with the requirements of ar- ticle IV of the Articles of Agreement of the Fund. (July 31, 1945, ch. 339, § 40, as added Pub. L. 98–181, title I [title VIII, § 801], Nov. 30, 1983, 97 Stat. 1267.) § 286z. Collection and exchange of information on monetary and financial problems (a) Sense of Congress It is the sense of the Congress that— (1) the lack of sufficient information cur- rently available to allow members of the Fund to make sound and prudent decisions con- cerning their public and private sector inter- national borrowing, and to allow lenders to make sound and prudent decisions concerning their international lending, threatens the sta- bility of the international monetary system; and (2) in recognition of the Fund’s duties

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 22 U.S.C. § 286aa

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 22 U.S.C. § 286aa. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

22 U.S.C. § 3943 — Appointments by the Secretary

The Secretary may appoint the members of the Service (other than the members of the Service who are in the personnel categories specified in [section 3942(a) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title22-section3942/a&num=0&edition=prelim)) in accordance with this chapter and such regulations as the Secretary may prescribe.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 22 U.S.C. § 3943

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 22 U.S.C. § 3943. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

22 U.S.C. § 3943 — Appointments by the Secretary

Page 1438 TITLE 22—FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE § 3943 By virtue of the authority vested in me by the Con- stitution and the statutes, including the Foreign Serv- ice Act of 1980 (94 Stat. 2071), as amended [this chapter], and as President of the United States and Commander in Chief of the armed forces of the United States, it is ordered as follows: 1. Executive Order No. 10062 of June 6, 1949, and Exec- utive Order No. 10144 of July 21, 1950, amending that order, are hereby revoked, and the position of United States High Commissioner for Germany, established by that order, is hereby abolished. 2. The Chief of the United States Diplomatic Mission to the Federal Republic of Germany, hereinafter re- ferred to as the Chief of Mission, shall have supreme authority, except as otherwise provided herein, with re- spect to all responsibilities, duties, and governmental functions of the United States in all Germany. The Chief of Mission shall exercise his authority under the supervision of the Secretary of State and subject to ul- timate direction by the President. 3. The United States Military Commander having area responsibility in Germany, hereinafter referred to as the Commander, shall have authority with respect to all military responsibilities, duties, and functions of the United States in all Germany, including the com- mand, security, and stationing of United States forces in Germany, the assertion and exercise of their rights and discharge of their obligations therein, and emer- gency measures which he may consider essential for their protection or the accomplishment of his mission. The Commander may delegate the authority conferred upon him. If action by the Commander or any rep- resentative of the Commander, pursuant to the author- ity here

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 22 U.S.C. § 3943

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 22 U.S.C. § 3943. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

22 U.S.C. § 5801 — Definitions

For purposes of this subchapter— (1) the term “contractor” means a National Aeronautics and Space Administration contractor to the extent that the acquisition of space hardware, space technology, or space services from the independent states of the former Soviet Union may be relevant to the contractor’s responsibilities under the contract; and (2) the term “designated congressional committees” means the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 22 U.S.C. § 5801

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 22 U.S.C. § 5801. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

22 U.S.C. § 5801 — Definition of independent states

Page 1695 TITLE 22—FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE § 5801 1 See References in Text note below. the chairman of the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate’’, and added subsecs. (b) and (c). 2002—Pub. L. 107–115 substituted ‘‘March 31, 2000, March 31, 2001, March 31, 2002, March 31, 2003, March 31, 2004, March 31, 2005, and March 31, 2006’’ for ‘‘and March 31, 2000,’’ in introductory provisions. 1996—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 104–107 inserted ‘‘March 31, 1996,’’ after ‘‘March 31, 1995,’’ in introductory provi- sions. Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries EXTENSION OF REPORTING TIME Pub. L. 107–115, title V, § 586(b), Jan. 10, 2002, 115 Stat. 2173, provided that: ‘‘The requirement in section 301 of the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act [22 U.S.C. 5731], as amended by subsection (a), that a report under that section shall be transmitted not later than March 31, 2001, shall be considered satisfied by the transmittal of such report by August 7, 2001.’’ REPORT ON SINO-BRITISH JOINT DECLARATION ON QUESTION OF HONG KONG Pub. L. 104–208, div. A, title I, § 101(c) [title V, § 571], Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–121, 3009–167, which directed that the additional report required to be submitted during 1997 under this section include detailed informa- tion on the status of, and other developments affecting, implementation of the Sino-British Joint Declaration on the Question of Hong Kong, was from the Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 1997, and was not repeated in sub- sequent appropriations acts. Similar provisions were contained in the following prior appropriation act: Pub. L. 104–107, title V, § 576(b), Feb. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 750. § 5732. Separate part of country reports Whenever a report is trans

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 22 U.S.C. § 5801

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 22 U.S.C. § 5801. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

22 U.S.C. § 5811 — Definition of independent states

For purposes of this Act, the terms “independent states of the former Soviet Union” and “independent states” mean the following: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Russia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, and Uzbekistan.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 22 U.S.C. § 5811

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

8 U.S.C. § 1101 — Definitions

**(a)** As used in this chapter— (1) The term “administrator” means the official designated by the Secretary of State pursuant to [section 1104(b) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title8-section1104/b&num=0&edition=prelim). (2) The term “advocates” includes, but is not limited to, advises, recommends, furthers by overt act, and admits belief in. (3) The term “alien” means any person not a citizen or national of the United States. (4) The term “application for admission” has reference to the application for admission into the United States and not to the application for the issuance of an immigrant or nonimmigrant visa. (5) The term “Attorney General” means the Attorney General of the United States. (6) The term “border crossing identification card” means a document of identity bearing that designation issued to an alien who is lawfully admitted for permanent residence, or to an alien who is a resident in foreign contiguous territory, by a consular officer or an immigration officer for the purpose of crossing over the borders between the United States and foreign contiguous territory in accordance with such conditions for its issuance and use as may be prescribed by regulations. Such regulations shall provide that (A) each such document include a biometric identifier (such as the fingerprint or handprint of the alien) that is machine readable and (B) an alien presenting a border crossing identification card is not permitted to cross over the border into the United States unless the biometric identifier contained on the card matches the appropriate biometric characteristic of the alien. (7) The term “clerk of court” means a clerk of a naturalization court. (8) The terms “Commissioner” and “Deputy Commissioner” mean the Co

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 8 U.S.C. § 1101

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 8 U.S.C. § 1101. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.