Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
22 U.S.C. § 5811 — Findings
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 1697
TITLE 22—FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE
§ 5811
‘‘(2) sections 136 [22 U.S.C. 3943 note] and 804 [99
Stat. 449] of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act,
Fiscal Years 1986 and 1987 (Public Law 99–93),
‘‘(3) section 1222 of the Foreign Relations Author-
ization Act, Fiscal Years 1988 and 1989 (Public Law
100–204; 101 Stat. 1411 [1414]),
‘‘(4) the Multilateral Export Control Enhancement
Amendments Act (50 [App.] U.S.C. 2410 note, et seq.)
[probably means former 50 U.S.C. App. 2410a note, see
Short Title of 1988 Amendment note now set out
under former section 4601 of Title 50, War and Na-
tional Defense],
‘‘(5) the joint resolution providing for the designa-
tion of ‘Captive Nations Week’ (Public Law 86–90) [73
Stat. 212],
‘‘(6) the Communist Control Act of 1954 (Public Law
83–637) [see Short Title note set out under section 781
of Title 50],
‘‘(7) provisions in the Immigration and Nationality
Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), including sections
101(a)(40), 101(e)(3), and 313(a)(3) [8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(40),
(e)(3), 1424(a)(3)],
‘‘(8) section 2 of the joint resolution entitled ‘A
joint resolution to promote peace and stability in the
Middle East’, approved March 9, 1957 (Public Law
85–7) [22 U.S.C. 1961 et seq.], and
‘‘(9) section 43 of the Bretton Woods Agreements
Act (22 U.S.C. 286aa),
should not be construed as being directed against Rus-
sia, Ukraine, or the other independent states of the
former Soviet Union, connoting an adversarial rela-
tionship between the United States and the inde-
pendent states, or signifying or implying in any man-
ner unfriendliness toward the independent states.’’
DEFINITIONS FOR PUB. L. 103–199
Pub. L. 103–199, § 3, Dec. 17, 1993, 107 Stat. 2318, pro-
vided that: ‘‘As used in this Act [see Short Title of 1993
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 22 U.S.C. § 5811
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: 3616b395a0affb8abe9c26b94c1e0b774764a81614203c88b5093b99ff59c553. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-c14d71cb8dda1c760952549d
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-22/section-5811-findings--d77e30fd2f.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 462eb4bef35147f68f855da2ca4cd3dc495fab73359151fcda9b3fffc2b6c966
Source location: USCODE-2024-title22-chap67-subchapI-sec5811.pdf
Stored source content
Page 1697
TITLE 22—FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE
§ 5811
‘‘(2) sections 136 [22 U.S.C. 3943 note] and 804 [99
Stat. 449] of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act,
Fiscal Years 1986 and 1987 (Public Law 99–93),
‘‘(3) section 1222 of the Foreign Relations Author-
ization Act, Fiscal Years 1988 and 1989 (Public Law
100–204; 101 Stat. 1411 [1414]),
‘‘(4) the Multilateral Export Control Enhancement
Amendments Act (50 [App.] U.S.C. 2410 note, et seq.)
[probably means former 50 U.S.C. App. 2410a note, see
Short Title of 1988 Amendment note now set out
under former section 4601 of Title 50, War and Na-
tional Defense],
‘‘(5) the joint resolution providing for the designa-
tion of ‘Captive Nations Week’ (Public Law 86–90) [73
Stat. 212],
‘‘(6) the Communist Control Act of 1954 (Public Law
83–637) [see Short Title note set out under section 781
of Title 50],
‘‘(7) provisions in the Immigration and Nationality
Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), including sections
101(a)(40), 101(e)(3), and 313(a)(3) [8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(40),
(e)(3), 1424(a)(3)],
‘‘(8) section 2 of the joint resolution entitled ‘A
joint resolution to promote peace and stability in the
Middle East’, approved March 9, 1957 (Public Law
85–7) [22 U.S.C. 1961 et seq.], and
‘‘(9) section 43 of the Bretton Woods Agreements
Act (22 U.S.C. 286aa),
should not be construed as being directed against Rus-
sia, Ukraine, or the other independent states of the
former Soviet Union, connoting an adversarial rela-
tionship between the United States and the inde-
pendent states, or signifying or implying in any man-
ner unfriendliness toward the independent states.’’
DEFINITIONS FOR PUB. L. 103–199
Pub. L. 103–199, § 3, Dec. 17, 1993, 107 Stat. 2318, pro-
vided that: ‘‘As used in this Act [see Short Title of 1993
Amendment note above] (including the amendments
made by this Act), the terms ‘independent states of the
former Soviet Union’ and ‘independent states’ have the
meaning given those terms by section 3 of the Freedom
for Russia and Emerging Eurasian Democracies and
Open Markets Support Act of 1992 (22 U.S.C. 5801).’’
SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL PROVISIONS
§ 5811. Findings
The Congress finds that—
(1) recent developments in Russia and the
other independent states of the former Soviet
Union present an historic opportunity for a
transition to a peaceful and stable inter-
national order and the integration of the inde-
pendent states of the former Soviet Union into
the community of democratic nations;
(2) the entire international community has a
vital interest in the success of this transition,
and the dimension of the problems now faced
in the independent states of the former Soviet
Union makes it imperative for donor countries
and institutions to provide the expertise and
support
necessary
to
ensure
continued
progress on economic and political reforms;
(3) the United States is especially well-posi-
tioned because of its heritage and traditions
to make a substantial contribution to this
transition by building on current technical co-
operation, medical, and food assistance pro-
grams, by assisting in the development of
democratic institutions, and by fostering con-
ditions that will encourage the United States
business community to engage in trade and in-
vestment;
(4) failure to meet the opportunities pre-
sented by these developments could threaten
United States national security interests and
jeopardize
substantial
savings
in
United
States defense that these developments have
made possible;
(5) the independent states of the former So-
viet Union face unprecedented environmental
problems that jeopardize the quality of life
and the very existence of not only their own
peoples but also the peoples of other countries,
and it is incumbent on the international com-
munity to assist the independent states in ad-
dressing these problems and in promoting sus-
tainable use of resources and development;
(6) the success of United States assistance
for the independent states of the former So-
viet Union depends on—
(A) effective coordination of United States
efforts with similar activities of friendly and
allied donor countries and of international
financial institutions, and
(B) reciprocal commitments by the govern-
ments of the independent states to work to-
ward the creation of democratic institutions
and an environment hospitable to foreign in-
vestment based upon the rule of law, includ-
ing negotiation of bilateral and multilateral
agreements on open trade and investment,
adoption of commercial codes, establishment
of transparency in regulatory and other gov-
ernmental decision making, and timely pay-
ment of obligations carried over from pre-
vious governmental entities; and
(7) trade and investment opportunities in
the independent states of the former Soviet
Union will generate employment and other
economic benefits for the United States as the
economies of the independent states of the
former Soviet Union begin to realize their
enormous potential as both customers and
suppliers.
(Pub. L. 102–511, title I, § 101, Oct. 24, 1992, 106
Stat. 3321.)
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
SERGEI MAGNITSKY RULE OF LAW ACCOUNTABILITY
Pub. L. 112–208, title IV, Dec. 14, 2012, 126 Stat. 1502,
provided that:
‘‘SEC. 401. SHORT TITLE.
‘‘This title may be cited as the ‘Sergei Magnitsky
Rule of Law Accountability Act of 2012’.
‘‘SEC. 402. FINDINGS; SENSE OF CONGRESS.
‘‘(a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following:
‘‘(1) The United States aspires to a mutually bene-
ficial relationship with the Russian Federation based
on respect for human rights and the rule of law, and
supports the people of the Russian Federation in
their efforts to realize their full economic potential
and to advance democracy, human rights, and the
rule of law.
‘‘(2) The Russian Federation—
‘‘(A) is a member of the United Nations, the Orga-
nization for Security and Co-operation in Europe,
the Council of Europe, and the International Mone-
tary Fund;
‘‘(B) has ratified the Convention against Torture
and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment
or Punishment, the International Covenant on Civil
and Political Rights, and the United Nations Con-
vention against Corruption; and
‘‘(C) is bound by the legal obligations set forth in
the European Convention on Human Rights.
Page 1698
TITLE 22—FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE
§ 5811
‘‘(3) States voluntarily commit themselves to re-
spect obligations and responsibilities through the
adoption of international agreements and treaties,
which must be observed in good faith in order to
maintain the stability of the international order.
Human rights are an integral part of international
law, and lie at the foundation of the international
order. The protection of human rights, therefore, par-
ticularly in the case of a country that has incurred
obligations to protect human rights under an inter-
national agreement to which it is a party, is not left
exclusively to the internal affairs of that country.
‘‘(4) Good governance and anti-corruption measures
are instrumental in the protection of human rights
and in achieving sustainable economic growth, which
benefits both the people of the Russian Federation
and the international community through the cre-
ation of open and transparent markets.
‘‘(5) Systemic corruption erodes trust and con-
fidence in democratic institutions, the rule of law,
and human rights protections. This is the case when
public officials are allowed to abuse their authority
with impunity for political or financial gains in col-
lusion with private entities.
‘‘(6) The Russian nongovernmental organization
INDEM has estimated that bribes by individuals and
businesses in the Russian Federation amount to hun-
dreds of billions of dollars a year, an increasing share
of the country’s gross domestic product.
‘‘(7) Sergei Leonidovich Magnitsky died on Novem-
ber 16, 2009, at the age of 37, in Matrosskaya Tishina
Prison in Moscow, Russia, and is survived by a moth-
er, a wife, and 2 sons.
‘‘(8) On July 6, 2011, Russian President Dimitry
Medvedev’s Human Rights Council announced the re-
sults of its independent investigation into the death
of Sergei Magnitsky. The Human Rights Council con-
cluded that Sergei Magnitsky’s arrest and detention
was illegal; he was denied access to justice by the
courts and prosecutors of the Russian Federation; he
was investigated by the same law enforcement offi-
cers whom he had accused of stealing Hermitage
Fund companies and illegally obtaining a fraudulent
$230,000,000 tax refund; he was denied necessary med-
ical care in custody; he was beaten by 8 guards with
rubber batons on the last day of his life; and the am-
bulance crew that was called to treat him as he was
dying was deliberately kept outside of his cell for one
hour and 18 minutes until he was dead. The report of
the Human Rights Council also states the officials
falsified their accounts of what happened to Sergei
Magnitsky and, 18 months after his death, no officials
had been brought to trial for his false arrest or the
crime he uncovered. The impunity continued in April
2012, when Russian authorities dropped criminal
charges against Larisa Litvinova, the head doctor at
the prison where Magnitsky died.
‘‘(9) The systematic abuse of Sergei Magnitsky, in-
cluding his repressive arrest and torture in custody
by officers of the Ministry of the Interior of the Rus-
sian Federation that Mr. Magnitsky had implicated
in the embezzlement of funds from the Russian Treas-
ury and the misappropriation of 3 companies from his
client, Hermitage Capital Management, reflects how
deeply the protection of human rights is affected by
corruption.
‘‘(10) The politically motivated nature of the perse-
cution of Mr. Magnitsky is demonstrated by—
‘‘(A) the denial by all state bodies of the Russian
Federation of any justice or legal remedies to Mr.
Magnitsky during the nearly 12 full months he was
kept without trial in detention; and
‘‘(B) the impunity since his death of state offi-
cials he testified against for their involvement in
corruption and the carrying out of his repressive
persecution.
‘‘(11) The Public Oversight Commission of the City
of Moscow for the Control of the Observance of
Human Rights in Places of Forced Detention, an or-
ganization empowered by Russian law to independ-
ently monitor prison conditions, concluded on De-
cember 29, 2009, ‘A man who is kept in custody and is
being detained is not capable of using all the nec-
essary means to protect either his life or his health.
This is a responsibility of a state which holds him
captive. Therefore, the case of Sergei Magnitsky can
be described as a breach of the right to life. The mem-
bers of the civic supervisory commission have
reached the conclusion that Magnitsky had been ex-
periencing both psychological and physical pressure
in custody, and the conditions in some of the wards
of Butyrka can be justifiably called torturous. The
people responsible for this must be punished.’.
‘‘(12) Sergei Magnitsky’s experience, while particu-
larly illustrative of the negative effects of official
corruption on the rights of an individual citizen, ap-
pears to be emblematic of a broader pattern of dis-
regard for the numerous domestic and international
human rights commitments of the Russian Federa-
tion and impunity for those who violate basic human
rights and freedoms.
‘‘(13) The second trial, verdict, and sentence against
former Yukos executives Mikhail Khodorkovsky and
Platon Lebedev evoke serious concerns about the
right to a fair trial and the independence of the judi-
ciary in the Russian Federation. The lack of credible
charges, intimidation of witnesses, violations of due
process and procedural norms, falsification or with-
holding of documents, denial of attorney-client privi-
lege, and illegal detention in the Yukos case are high-
ly troubling. The Council of Europe, Freedom House,
and Amnesty International, among others, have con-
cluded that they were charged and imprisoned in a
process that did not follow the rule of law and was
politically influenced. Furthermore, senior officials
of the Government of the Russian Federation, includ-
ing First Deputy Prime Minister Igor Shuvalov, have
acknowledged that the arrest and imprisonment of
Khodorkovsky were politically motivated.
‘‘(14) According to Freedom House’s 2011 report en-
titled ‘The Perpetual Battle: Corruption in the
Former Soviet Union and the New EU Members’,
‘[t]he highly publicized cases of Sergei Magnitsky, a
37-year-old lawyer who died in pretrial detention in
November 2009 after exposing a multimillion-dollar
fraud against the Russian taxpayer, and Mikhail
Khodorkovsky, the jailed business magnate and re-
gime critic who was sentenced at the end of 2010 to
remain in prison through 2017, put an international
spotlight on the Russian state’s contempt for the rule
of law * * *. By silencing influential and accom-
plished figures such as Khodorkovsky and Magnitsky,
the Russian authorities have made it abundantly
clear that anyone in Russia can be silenced.’.
‘‘(15) The tragic and unresolved murders of Nustap
Abdurakhmanov,
Maksharip
Aushev,
Natalya
Estemirova,
Akhmed
Hadjimagomedov,
Umar
Israilov,
Paul
Klebnikov,
Anna
Politkovskaya,
Saihadji Saihadjiev, and Magomed Y. Yevloyev, the
death in custody of Vera Trifonova, the disappear-
ances of Mokhmadsalakh Masaev and Said-Saleh
Ibragimov, the torture of Ali Israilov and Islam
Umarpashaev, the near-fatal beatings of Mikhail
Beketov, Oleg Kashin, Arkadiy Lander, and Mikhail
Vinyukov, and the harsh and ongoing imprisonment
of Mikhail Khodorkovsky, Alexei Kozlov, Platon
Lebedev, and Fyodor Mikheev further illustrate the
grave danger of exposing the wrongdoing of officials
of the Government of the Russian Federation, includ-
ing Chechen leader Ramzan Kadyrov, or of seeking to
obtain, exercise, defend, or promote internationally
recognized human rights and freedoms.
‘‘(b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress
that the United States should continue to strongly sup-
port, and provide assistance to, the efforts of the Rus-
sian people to establish a vibrant democratic political
system that respects individual liberties and human
rights, including by enhancing the provision of objec-
tive information through all relevant media, such as
Radio Liberty and the internet. The Russian Govern-
Page 1699
TITLE 22—FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE
§ 5811
ment’s suppression of dissent and political opposition,
the limitations it has imposed on civil society and
independent media, and the deterioration of economic
and political freedom inside Russia are of profound con-
cern to the United States Government and to the
American people.
‘‘SEC. 403. DEFINITIONS.
‘‘In this title:
‘‘(1) ADMITTED; ALIEN.—The terms ‘admitted’ and
‘alien’ have the meanings given those terms in sec-
tion 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8
U.S.C. 1101).
‘‘(2) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES.—The
term ‘appropriate congressional committees’ means—
‘‘(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Com-
mittee on Financial Services, the Committee on
Foreign Affairs, the Committee on Homeland Secu-
rity, and the Committee on the Judiciary of the
House of Representatives; and
‘‘(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Com-
mittee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, the
Committee on Foreign Relations, the Committee
on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs,
and the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate.
‘‘(3) FINANCIAL INSTITUTION.—The term ‘financial in-
stitution’ has the meaning given that term in section
5312 of title 31, United States Code.
‘‘(4) UNITED
STATES
PERSON.—The term ‘United
States person’ means—
‘‘(A) a United States citizen or an alien lawfully
admitted for permanent residence to the United
States; or
‘‘(B) an entity organized under the laws of the
United States or of any jurisdiction within the
United States, including a foreign branch of such
an entity.
‘‘SEC. 404. IDENTIFICATION OF PERSONS RESPON-
SIBLE FOR THE DETENTION, ABUSE, AND
DEATH OF SERGEI MAGNITSKY AND OTHER
GROSS VIOLATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS.
‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 120 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 14, 2012], the
President shall submit to the appropriate congressional
committees a list of each person who the President de-
termines, based on credible information—
‘‘(1) is responsible for the detention, abuse, or death
of Sergei Magnitsky, participated in efforts to con-
ceal the legal liability for the detention, abuse, or
death of Sergei Magnitsky, financially benefitted
from the detention, abuse, or death of Sergei
Magnitsky, or was involved in the criminal con-
spiracy uncovered by Sergei Magnitsky;
‘‘(2) is responsible for extrajudicial killings, tor-
ture, or other gross violations of internationally rec-
ognized human rights committed against individuals
seeking—
‘‘(A) to expose illegal activity carried out by offi-
cials of the Government of the Russian Federation;
or
‘‘(B) to obtain, exercise, defend, or promote inter-
nationally recognized human rights and freedoms,
such as the freedoms of religion, expression, asso-
ciation, and assembly, and the rights to a fair trial
and democratic elections, in Russia; or
‘‘(3) acted as an agent of or on behalf of a person in
a matter relating to an activity described in para-
graph (1) or (2).
‘‘(b) UPDATES.—The President shall submit to the ap-
propriate congressional committees an update of the
list required by subsection (a) as new information be-
comes available.
‘‘(c) FORM.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The list required by subsection
(a) shall be submitted in unclassified form.
‘‘(2) EXCEPTION.—The name of a person to be in-
cluded in the list required by subsection (a) may be
submitted in a classified annex only if the Presi-
dent—
‘‘(A) determines that it is vital for the national
security interests of the United States to do so;
‘‘(B) uses the annex in such a manner consistent
with congressional intent and the purposes of this
Act; and
‘‘(C) 15 days prior to submitting the name in a
classified annex, provides to the appropriate con-
gressional committees notice of, and a justification
for, including or continuing to include each person
in the classified annex despite any publicly avail-
able credible information indicating that the per-
son engaged in an activity described in paragraph
(1), (2), or (3) of subsection (a).
‘‘(3) CONSIDERATION OF DATA FROM OTHER COUNTRIES
AND NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS.—In preparing
the list required by subsection (a), the President shall
consider information provided by the chairperson and
ranking member of each of the appropriate congres-
sional committees and credible data obtained by
other countries and nongovernmental organizations,
including organizations inside Russia, that monitor
the human rights abuses of the Government of the
Russian Federation.
‘‘(4) PUBLIC AVAILABILITY.—The unclassified portion
of the list required by subsection (a) shall be made
available to the public and published in the Federal
Register.
‘‘(d) REMOVAL FROM LIST.—A person may be removed
from the list required by subsection (a) if the President
determines and reports to the appropriate congres-
sional committees not less than 15 days prior to the re-
moval of the person from the list that—
‘‘(1) credible information exists that the person did
not engage in the activity for which the person was
added to the list;
‘‘(2) the person has been prosecuted appropriately
for the activity in which the person engaged; or
‘‘(3) the person has credibly demonstrated a signifi-
cant change in behavior, has paid an appropriate con-
sequence for the activities in which the person en-
gaged, and has credibly committed to not engage in
the types of activities specified in paragraphs (1)
through (3) of subsection (a).
‘‘(e) REQUESTS BY CHAIRPERSON AND RANKING MEMBER
OF APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 120 days after re-
ceiving a written request from the chairperson and
ranking member of one of the appropriate congres-
sional committees with respect to whether a person
meets the criteria for being added to the list required
by subsection (a), the President shall submit a re-
sponse to the chairperson and ranking member of the
committee which made the request with respect to
the status of the person.
‘‘(2) FORM.—The President may submit a response
required by paragraph (1) in classified form if the
President determines that it is necessary for the na-
tional security interests of the United States to do
so.
‘‘(3) REMOVAL.—If the President removes from the
list required by subsection (a) a person who has been
placed on the list at the request of the chairperson
and ranking member of one of the appropriate con-
gressional committees, the President shall provide
the chairperson and ranking member with any infor-
mation that contributed to the removal decision. The
President may submit such information in classified
form if the President determines that such is nec-
essary for the national security interests of the
United States.
‘‘(f) NONAPPLICABILITY OF CONFIDENTIALITY REQUIRE-
MENT WITH RESPECT TO VISA RECORDS.—The President
shall publish the list required by subsection (a) without
regard to the requirements of section 222(f) of the Im-
migration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1202(f)) with re-
spect to confidentiality of records pertaining to the
issuance or refusal of visas or permits to enter the
United States.
‘‘SEC. 405. INADMISSIBILITY OF CERTAIN ALIENS.
‘‘(a) INELIGIBILITY FOR VISAS.—An alien is ineligible
to receive a visa to enter the United States and ineli-
Page 1700
TITLE 22—FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE
§ 5811
gible to be admitted to the United States if the alien
is on the list required by section 404(a).
‘‘(b) CURRENT
VISAS
REVOKED.—The Secretary of
State shall revoke, in accordance with section 221(i) of
the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1201(i)),
the visa or other documentation of any alien who
would be ineligible to receive such a visa or docu-
mentation under subsection (a) of this section.
‘‘(c) WAIVER FOR NATIONAL SECURITY INTERESTS.—
‘‘(1) IN
GENERAL.—The Secretary of State may
waive the application of subsection (a) or (b) in the
case of an alien if—
‘‘(A) the Secretary determines that such a waiv-
er—
‘‘(i) is necessary to permit the United States to
comply with the Agreement between the United
Nations and the United States of America regard-
ing the Headquarters of the United Nations,
signed June 26, 1947, and entered into force No-
vember 21, 1947, or other applicable international
obligations of the United States; or
‘‘(ii) is in the national security interests of the
United States; and
‘‘(B) prior to granting such a waiver, the Sec-
retary provides to the appropriate congressional
committees notice of, and a justification for, the
waiver.
‘‘(2) TIMING
FOR
CERTAIN
WAIVERS.—Notification
under subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1) shall be made
not later than 15 days prior to granting a waiver
under such paragraph if the Secretary grants such
waiver in the national security interests of the
United States in accordance with subparagraph
(A)(ii) of such paragraph.
‘‘(d) REGULATORY AUTHORITY.—The Secretary of State
shall prescribe such regulations as are necessary to
carry out this section.
‘‘SEC. 406. FINANCIAL MEASURES.
‘‘(a) FREEZING OF ASSETS.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The President shall exercise all
powers granted by the International Emergency Eco-
nomic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (except that
the requirements of section 202 of such Act (50 U.S.C.
1701) shall not apply) to the extent necessary to
freeze and prohibit all transactions in all property
and interests in property of a person who is on the
list required by section 404(a) of this Act if such prop-
erty and interests in property are in the United
States, come within the United States, or are or
come within the possession or control of a United
States person.
‘‘(2) EXCEPTION.—Paragraph (1) shall not apply to
persons included on the classified annex under sec-
tion 404(c)(2) if the President determines that such an
exception is vital for the national security interests
of the United States.
‘‘(b) WAIVER FOR NATIONAL SECURITY INTERESTS.—The
Secretary of the Treasury may waive the application of
subsection (a) if the Secretary determines that such a
waiver is in the national security interests of the
United States. Not less than 15 days prior to granting
such a waiver, the Secretary shall provide to the appro-
priate congressional committees notice of, and a jus-
tification for, the waiver.
‘‘(c) ENFORCEMENT.—
‘‘(1) PENALTIES.—A person that violates, attempts
to violate, conspires to violate, or causes a violation
of this section or any regulation, license, or order
issued to carry out this section shall be subject to the
penalties set forth in subsections (b) and (c) of sec-
tion 206 of the International Emergency Economic
Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1705) to the same extent as a
person that commits an unlawful act described in
subsection (a) of such section.
‘‘(2) REQUIREMENTS
FOR
FINANCIAL
INSTITUTIONS.—
Not later than 120 days after the date of the enact-
ment of this Act [Dec. 14, 2012], the Secretary of the
Treasury shall prescribe or amend regulations as
needed to require each financial institution that is a
United States person and has within its possession or
control assets that are property or interests in prop-
erty of a person who is on the list required by section
404(a) if such property and interests in property are
in the United States to certify to the Secretary that,
to the best of the knowledge of the financial institu-
tion, the financial institution has frozen all assets
within the possession or control of the financial insti-
tution that are required to be frozen pursuant to sub-
section (a).
‘‘(d) REGULATORY AUTHORITY.—The Secretary of the
Treasury shall issue such regulations, licenses, and or-
ders as are necessary to carry out this section.
‘‘SEC. 407. REPORT TO CONGRESS.
‘‘Not later than one year after the date of the enact-
ment of this Act [Dec. 14, 2012] and annually thereafter,
the Secretary of State and the Secretary of the Treas-
ury shall submit to the appropriate congressional com-
mittees a report on—
‘‘(1) the actions taken to carry out this title, in-
cluding—
‘‘(A) the number of persons added to or removed
from the list required by section 404(a) during the
year preceding the report, the dates on which such
persons have been added or removed, and the rea-
sons for adding or removing them; and
‘‘(B) if few or no such persons have been added to
that list during that year, the reasons for not add-
ing more such persons to the list; and
‘‘(2) efforts by the executive branch to encourage
the governments of other countries to impose sanc-
tions that are similar to the sanctions imposed under
this title.’’
[Memorandum of President of the United States, Apr.
5, 2013, 78 F.R. 22763, delegated the functions conferred
upon the President by sections 404(a), 404(b), and 404(d),
with respect to the determinations provided for there-
in; 404(c)(3); 404(c)(4), consistent with section 404(f); and
406(a)(1) of Pub. L. 112–208, set out above, to the Sec-
retary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Sec-
retary of State, and delegated the functions and au-
thorities in sections 404(a), 404(b), and 404(d), with re-
spect to the submission of the list, updates, and reports
described in those respective sections, 404(c)(2), 404(e),
and 406(a)(2) of Pub. L. 112–208 to the Secretary of
State, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treas-
ury.]
BELARUS DEMOCRACY
Pub. L. 118–31, div. F, title LXIV, § 6406, Dec. 22, 2023,
137 Stat. 999, as amended by Pub. L. 118–159, div. G, title
LXXII, § 7205, Dec. 23, 2024, 138 Stat. 2530, provided that:
‘‘(a) SPECIAL ENVOY.—The President shall appoint a
Special Envoy for Belarus within the Department [of
State] (referred to in this section as the ‘Special
Envoy’). The Special Envoy should be a person of recog-
nized distinction in the field of European security, geo-
politics, democracy and human rights, and may be a ca-
reer Foreign Service Officer.
‘‘(b) CENTRAL OBJECTIVE.—The central objective of
the Special Envoy is to coordinate and promote ef-
forts—
‘‘(1) to improve respect for the fundamental human
rights of the people of Belarus;
‘‘(2) to sustain focus on the national security impli-
cations of Belarus’s political and military alignment
for the United States; and
‘‘(3) to respond to the political, economic, and secu-
rity impacts of events in Belarus upon neighboring
countries and the wider region.
‘‘(c)
DUTIES
AND
RESPONSIBILITIES.—The
Special
Envoy shall—
‘‘(1) engage in discussions with Belarusian officials
regarding human rights, political, economic and se-
curity issues in Belarus;
‘‘(2) support international efforts to promote
human rights and political freedoms in Belarus, in-
cluding coordination and dialogue between the
United States and the United Nations, the Organiza-
Page 1701
TITLE 22—FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE
§ 5811
tion for Security and Cooperation in Europe, the Eu-
ropean Union, Belarus, and the other countries in
Eastern Europe;
‘‘(3) consult with nongovernmental organizations
that have attempted to address human rights and po-
litical and economic instability in Belarus;
‘‘(4) make recommendations regarding the funding
of activities promoting human rights, democracy, the
rule of law, and the development of a market econ-
omy in Belarus;
‘‘(5) review strategies for improving protection of
human rights in Belarus, including technical training
and exchange programs;
‘‘(6) develop an action plan for holding to account
the perpetrators of the human rights violations docu-
mented in the United Nations High Commissioner for
Human Rights report on the situation of human
rights in Belarus in the run-up to the 2020 presi-
dential election and its aftermath (Human Rights
Council Resolution 49/36 [sic]);
‘‘(7) engage with member countries of the North At-
lantic Treaty Organization, the Organization for Se-
curity and Cooperation in Europe and the European
Union with respect to the implications of Belarus’s
political and security alignment for transatlantic se-
curity; and
‘‘(8) work within the Department and among
partnering countries to sustain focus on the political
situation in Belarus.
‘‘(d) ROLE.—The position of Special Envoy—
‘‘(1) shall only exist while United States diplomatic
operations in Belarus at the United States Embassy
in Minsk, Belarus are suspended; and
‘‘(2) shall oversee the operations and personnel of
the Belarus Affairs Unit.
‘‘(e) REPORT ON ACTIVITIES.—Not later than 180 days
after the date of the enactment of this division [Dec. 22,
2023], and annually thereafter for the following 5 years,
the Secretary [of State], in consultation with the Spe-
cial Envoy, shall submit a report to the appropriate
congressional committees [Committee on Foreign Rela-
tions of the Senate and Committee on Foreign Affairs
of the House of Representatives] that describes the ac-
tivities undertaken pursuant to subsection (c) during
the reporting period.
‘‘(f) SUNSET.—The position of Special Envoy for
Belarus and the authorities provided by this section
shall terminate 5 years after the date of the enactment
of this division.’’
Pub. L. 108–347, Oct. 20, 2004, 118 Stat. 1383, as amend-
ed by Pub. L. 109–480, §§ 2–4(c)(1), 5–8, Jan. 12, 2007, 120
Stat. 3666–3672; Pub. L. 112–82, §§ 2–6, Jan. 3, 2012, 125
Stat. 1863–1867; Pub. L. 116–260, div. FF, title III,
§§ 322–329, Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 3101–3113, provided
that:
‘‘SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
‘‘This Act may be cited as the ‘Belarus Democracy
Act of 2004’.
‘‘SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
‘‘Congress finds the following:
‘‘(1) The International Covenant on Civil and Polit-
ical Rights, done at New York December 19, 1966, was
ratified by Belarus in 1973, guaranteeing Belarusians
the freedom of expression and the freedom of associa-
tion.
‘‘(2) Alyaksandr Lukashenka has ruled Belarus as
an undemocratic dictatorship since the first presi-
dential election in Belarus in 1994.
‘‘(3) Subsequent presidential elections in Belarus
have been neither free nor fair and have been rejected
by the international community as not meeting mini-
mal electoral standards, with the jailing of opposi-
tion activists frequently used as a tool of government
repression before and after the elections.
‘‘(4) In response to the repression and violence dur-
ing the 2006 presidential election, Congress passed the
Belarus Democracy Reauthorization Act of 2006 (Pub-
lic Law 109–480).
‘‘(5) In 2006, President George W. Bush issued Exec-
utive Order 13405, titled ‘Blocking Property of Cer-
tain Persons Undermining Democratic Processes or
Institutions in Belarus’ [listed in a table under sec-
tion 1701 of Title 50, War and National Defense],
which authorized the imposition of sanctions against
persons responsible for—
‘‘(A)
undermining
democratic
processes
in
Belarus; or
‘‘(B) participating in human rights abuses related
to political repression in Belarus.
‘‘(6) In March 2011, the Senate unanimously passed
Senate Resolution 105, which—
‘‘(A) condemned the December 2010 election in
Belarus as ‘illegitimate, fraudulent, and not rep-
resentative of the will or the aspirations of the vot-
ers in Belarus’; and
‘‘(B) called on the Lukashenka regime ‘to imme-
diately and unconditionally release all political
prisoners in Belarus who were arrested in associa-
tion with the December 19, 2010, election’.
‘‘(7) The Government of Belarus, led illegally by
Alyaksandr Lukashenka, continues to engage in a
pattern of clear and persistent violations of human
rights and fundamental freedoms.
‘‘(8) The Government of Belarus, led illegally by
Alyaksandr Lukashenka, continues to engage in a
pattern of clear and uncorrected violations of basic
principles
of
democratic
governance,
including
through a series of fundamentally flawed presidential
and parliamentary elections undermining the legit-
imacy of executive and legislative authority in that
country.
‘‘(9) The Government of Belarus, led illegally by
Alyaksandr Lukashenka, continues to subject thou-
sands of pro-democracy political activists and peace-
ful protesters to harassment, beatings, and imprison-
ment, particularly as a result of their attempts to
peacefully exercise their right to freedom of assembly
and association.
‘‘(10) The Government of Belarus, led illegally by
Alyaksandr Lukashenka, continues to suppress inde-
pendent media and journalists and to restrict access
to the internet, including social media and other dig-
ital communication platforms, in violation of the
right to freedom of speech and expression of those
dissenting from the dictatorship of Alyaksandr
Lukashenka.
‘‘(11) The Government of Belarus, led illegally by
Alyaksandr Lukashenka, continues a systematic
campaign of harassment, repression, and closure of
nongovernmental
organizations,
including
inde-
pendent trade unions and entrepreneurs, creating a
climate of fear that inhibits the development of civil
society and social solidarity.
‘‘(12) The Government of Belarus, led illegally by
Alyaksandr Lukashenka, has pursued a policy under-
mining the country’s sovereignty and independence
by making Belarus political, economic, cultural, and
societal interests subservient to those of Russia.
‘‘(13) The Government of Belarus, led illegally by
Alyaksandr Lukashenka, continues to reduce the
independence of Belarus through integration into a
so-called ‘Union State’ that is under the control of
Russia.
‘‘(14) In advance of the August 2020 presidential
elections in Belarus, authorities acting on behalf of
President Lukashenka arrested journalists, bloggers,
political activists, and opposition leaders, including 3
leading
presidential
candidates
(Syarhey
Tsikhanouski,
Mikalay
Statkevich,
and
Viktar
Babaryka), who were barred from running in the elec-
tion by the Central Election Commission of the Re-
public of Belarus.
‘‘(15) While the 3 opposition candidates were impris-
oned, 2 of their wives and 1 of their campaign man-
agers
(Sviatlana
Tsikhanouskaya,
Veranika
Tsepkala, and Maria Kalesnikava) joined together
and ran in place of the candidates.
‘‘(16) Thousands of Belarusian people demonstrated
their support for these candidates by attending ral-
lies, including 1 rally that included an estimated
63,000 participants.
Page 1702
TITLE 22—FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE
§ 5811
‘‘(17) On August, 5, 2020, the Senate unanimously
passed Senate Resolution 658, which calls for a free,
fair, and transparent presidential election in Belarus,
including the unimpeded participation of all presi-
dential candidates.
‘‘(18) On August 9, 2020, the Government of Belarus
conducted a presidential election that—
‘‘(A) was held under undemocratic conditions that
did not meet international standards;
‘‘(B) involved government malfeasance and seri-
ous irregularities with ballot counting and the re-
porting of election results, including—
‘‘(i) early voting ballot stuffing;
‘‘(ii) ballot burning;
‘‘(iii) pressuring poll workers; and
‘‘(iv) removing bags full of ballots by climbing
out of windows;
‘‘(C) included restrictive measures that impeded
the work of local independent observers and did not
provide sufficient notice to the OSCE [Organization
for Security and Cooperation in Europe] to allow
for the OSCE to monitor the elections, as is cus-
tomary.
‘‘(19) Incumbent president Alyaksandr Lukashenka
declared a landslide victory in the election and
claimed to have received more than 80 percent of the
votes cast in the election.
‘‘(20) The leading opposition candidate, Sviatlana
Tsikhanouskaya—
‘‘(A) formally disputed the government’s reported
election results;
‘‘(B) explained that her staff had examined the
election results from more than 50 polling places;
and
‘‘(C) found that her share of the vote exceeded
Lukashenka’s share by many times.
‘‘(21) On August 10, 2020, Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya
was detained while attending a meeting with the Cen-
tral Election Commission of the Republic of Belarus
and forced to flee to Lithuania under pressure from
government authorities.
‘‘(22) On August 11, 2020, Lithuanian Foreign Min-
ister Linas Linkevicˇius announced that Sviatlana
Tsikhanouskaya was safe in Lithuania and has con-
tinued to be one of the strongest voices supporting
the pro-democracy movement in Belarus within the
European Union and globally.
‘‘(23) On August 18, 2020, Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya
announced the formation of a Coordination Council
to oversee a resolution to the crisis in Belarus and a
peaceful transition of power by subjecting the Coun-
cil’s senior members to violence, detention, and
forced exile. The Government of Belarus, led illegally
by Alyaksandr Lukashenka, has sought to stop the
work of the Coordination Council.
‘‘(24) Before the European Parliament on August 25,
2020, Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya stressed that a
‘peaceful revolution’ was underway in Belarus, and
that ‘It is neither a pro-Russian nor anti-Russian rev-
olution. It is neither an anti-European Union nor a
pro-European Union revolution. It is a democratic
revolution.’.
‘‘(25) On or around September 6, 2020, opposition
leader Maria Kalesnikava and members of the Coordi-
nation Council, including Anton Ronenkov, Ivan
Kravtsov, and Maxim Bogretsov, were detained by au-
thorities who sought to forcibly expel them to
Ukraine. Ms. Kalesnikava tore up her passport at the
Ukrainian border in a successful effort to prevent
this expulsion, subsequently disappeared, and was
discovered in a Minsk prison on September 9, 2020.
‘‘(26) On August 11, 2020, the European Union High
Representative for Foreign and Security Policy,
Josep Borrell, issued a declaration on the presi-
dential election in Belarus stating that the elections
were neither free nor fair.
‘‘(27) On August 28, 2020, United States Deputy Sec-
retary of State Stephen Biegun declared that the Au-
gust 9th election in Belarus was fraudulent.
‘‘(28) Following Alyaksandr Lukashenka’s Sep-
tember 23, 2020, secret inauguration, the United
States, the European Union, numerous European
Union member states, the United Kingdom, and Can-
ada announced that they did not recognize Mr.
Lukashenka as the legitimately elected leader of
Belarus.
‘‘(29) Since the sham election on August 9, 2020, tens
of thousands of Belarusian citizens have participated
in daily peaceful protests calling for a new, free, and
fair election, and the release of political prisoners.
‘‘(30) According to Amnesty International, on Au-
gust 30, 2020, Belarusians held one of the largest pro-
test rallies in the country’s modern history in Minsk
and in other cities, which was attended by at least
100,000 people who demanded the resignation of Presi-
dent Lukashenka and an investigation into the
human rights violations in Belarus.
‘‘(31) Women have served as the leading force in
demonstrations across the country, protesting the
police brutality and mass detentions by wearing
white, carrying flowers, forming ‘solidarity chains’,
and unmasking undercover police trying to arrest
demonstrators.
‘‘(32) The Government of Belarus has responded to
the peaceful opposition protests, which are the larg-
est in Belarus history, with a violent crackdown, in-
cluding, according to the United Nations Special
Rapporteur, the detention by government authorities
of more than 10,000 peaceful protestors as of Sep-
tember 18, 2020, mostly for taking part in or observ-
ing peaceful protests, with many of these arrests fol-
lowed by beatings and torture at the hands of
Belarusian law enforcement.
‘‘(33) According to the Viasna Human Rights Cen-
tre, at least 450 detainees have reported being tor-
tured or otherwise ill-treated while held in incommu-
nicado detention for up to 10 days, including
through—
‘‘(A) severe beatings;
‘‘(B) forced performance of humiliating acts; and
‘‘(C) sexual violence and other forms of violence.
‘‘(34) At least 4 Belarusians have been killed at pro-
tests, and dozens of Belarusians who were detained
during the protests are still missing.
‘‘(35) The Belarus Ministry of Defense threatened to
send the army to confront protestors, warning that in
case of any violation of peace and order in areas
around national monuments, ‘you will have the army
to deal with now, not the police’.
‘‘(36) The Government of Belarus, led illegally by
Alyaksandr Lukashenka, has consistently restricted
the free flow of information to silence the opposition
and to conceal the regime’s violent crackdown on
peaceful protestors, including by—
‘‘(A) stripping the accreditation of journalists
from major foreign news outlets;
‘‘(B) detaining and harassing countless journal-
ists.
‘‘(C) arresting dozens of journalists, 6 of whom re-
port for Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty;
‘‘(D) halting the publishing of 2 independent
newspapers; and
‘‘(E) disrupting internet access;
‘‘(F) blocking more than 50 news websites that
were covering the protests; and
‘‘(G) limiting access to social media and other
digital communication platforms.
‘‘(37) Internet access in Belarus has been repeatedly
disrupted and restricted since August 9, 2020, which
independent experts and monitoring groups have at-
tributed to government interference.
‘‘(38) Thousands of employees at Belarusian state-
owned enterprises, who have been seen as Alyaksandr
Lukashenka’s traditional base during his 26-year
rule, went on strike across the country to protest
Lukashenka’s illegitimate election and the subse-
quent crackdowns, including at some of Belarus’s
largest factories such as the BelAZ truck plant, the
Minsk Tractor Works, and the Minsk Automobile
Plant.
‘‘(39) After the employees of state media outlets
walked off the job in protest rather than help report
Page 1703
TITLE 22—FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE
§ 5811
misleading
government
propaganda,
Lukashenka
confirmed that he ‘asked the Russians’ to send teams
of Russian journalists to replace local employees.
‘‘(40) On August 19, 2020, European Council Presi-
dent Charles Michel announced that the European
Union would impose sanctions on a substantial num-
ber of individuals responsible for violence, repression,
and election fraud in Belarus.
‘‘(41) On October 2, 2020, the Department of Treas-
ury announced new sanctions under Executive Order
13405 on eight individuals ‘for their roles in the fraud-
ulent August 9, 2020 Belarus presidential election or
the subsequent violent crackdown on peaceful pro-
testers’.
‘‘(42) Similar sanctions have also been applied to
Belarusian human rights violators by the Govern-
ment of Canada and the Government of the United
Kingdom.
‘‘(43) Against the will of the majority of the
Belarusian people—
‘‘(A) Alyaksandr Lukashenka appealed to Russian
President Vladimir Putin to provide security as-
sistance to his government, if requested; and
‘‘(B) President Putin has agreed to prop up the
Alyaksandr Lukashenka regime by—
‘‘(i) confirming that a Russian police force was
ready to be deployed if ‘the situation gets out of
control’;
‘‘(ii) providing significant financial support;
and
‘‘(iii) sending Russian propagandists to help dis-
seminate pro-regime propaganda on Belarus state
television.
‘‘(44) The Governments of the United States, the
European Union, the United Kingdom, and Canada
have—
‘‘(A) condemned the violent crackdown on peace-
ful protestors;
‘‘(B) refused to accept the results of the fraudu-
lent election; and
‘‘(C) called for new free and fair elections under
independent observation.
‘‘SEC. 3. STATEMENT OF POLICY.
‘‘It is the policy of the United States—
‘‘(1) to condemn—
‘‘(A) the conduct of the August 9, 2020, presi-
dential election in Belarus, which was neither free
nor fair;
‘‘(B) the Belarusian authorities’ unrelenting
crackdown on, arbitrary arrests of, and violence
against opposition candidates, peaceful protestors,
human rights activists, employees from state-
owned enterprises participating in strikes, inde-
pendent election observers, and independent jour-
nalists and bloggers; and
‘‘(C) the unjustified detention and forced or at-
tempted expulsion of members of the Coordination
Council in Belarus;
‘‘(2) to continue demanding the immediate release
without preconditions of all political prisoners in
Belarus and those arrested for peacefully protesting,
including all those individuals detained in connection
with the August 9, 2020, presidential election;
‘‘(3) to stand in solidarity with the people of
Belarus, including human rights defenders, bloggers,
and journalists, who are exercising their right to
freedom of assembly, freedom of expression, and rule
of law and to continue supporting the aspirations of
the people of Belarus for democracy, human rights,
and the rule of law;
‘‘(4) to continue actively supporting the aspirations
of the people of the Republic of Belarus—
‘‘(A) to preserve the independence and sov-
ereignty of their country; and
‘‘(B) to freely exercise their religion, including
the head of the Catholic Church in Belarus, Arch-
bishop Tadeusz Kondrusiewicz, who was barred
from
entering
the
country
after
criticizing
Belarusian authorities;
‘‘(5) to recognize the leading role of women in the
peaceful protests and pro-democracy movement in
Belarus;
‘‘(6) to continue—
‘‘(A) rejecting the invalid results of the fraudu-
lent August 9, 2020 presidential election in Belarus
announced by the Central Election Commission of
the Republic of Belarus; and
‘‘(B) supporting calls for new presidential and
parliamentary elections, conducted in a manner
that is free and fair according to OSCE standards
and under the supervision of OSCE observers and
independent domestic observers;
‘‘(7) to refuse to recognize Alyaksandr Lukashenka
as the legitimately elected leader of Belarus;
‘‘(8) to not recognize any incorporation of Belarus
into a ‘Union State’ with Russia, since this so-called
‘Union State’ would be both an attempt to absorb
Belarus and a step to reconstituting the totalitarian
Soviet Union;
‘‘(9) to continue calling for the fulfillment by the
Government of Belarus of Belarus’s freely undertaken
obligations as an OSCE participating state and as a
signatory of the Charter of the United Nations;
‘‘(10) to support an OSCE role in mediating a dia-
logue within Belarus between the government and
genuine representatives of Belarusian society;
‘‘(11) to recognize the Coordination Council as a le-
gitimate institution to participate in a dialogue on a
peaceful transition of power;
‘‘(12) to applaud the commitment by foreign dip-
lomats in Minsk to engage with Coordination Council
member and Nobel Laureate, Svetlana Alexievich,
and to encourage an ongoing dialogue with her and
with other leaders of the democratically-oriented po-
litical opposition in Belarus;
‘‘(13) to urge an expanded United States diplomatic
presence in Belarus to advocate for the aspirations of
the people of Belarus for democracy, human rights,
and the rule of law;
‘‘(14) to encourage the United States Government—
‘‘(A) to continue working closely with the Euro-
pean Union, the United Kingdom, Canada, and
other countries and international organizations to
promote the principles of democracy, the rule of
law, and human rights in Belarus; and
‘‘(B) to impose targeted sanctions, in coordina-
tion with the European Union and other inter-
national partners, against officials in Belarus who
are responsible for—
‘‘(i)
undermining
democratic
processes
in
Belarus; or
‘‘(ii) participating in human rights abuses re-
lated to political repression in Belarus;
‘‘(15) to call on the Government of Belarus to up-
hold its human rights obligations, including those
rights enumerated in the International Covenant on
Civil and Political Rights; and
‘‘(16) to support—
‘‘(A)
the
continued
territorial
integrity
of
Belarus; and
‘‘(B) the right of the Belarusian people to deter-
mine their future.
‘‘SEC. 4. ASSISTANCE TO PROMOTE DEMOCRACY,
CIVIL
SOCIETY,
AND
SOVEREIGNTY
IN
BELARUS.
‘‘(a) PURPOSES OF ASSISTANCE.—The assistance under
this section shall be available for the following pur-
poses:
‘‘(1) To assist the people of the Republic of Belarus
in their pursuit of freedom, democracy, and human
rights and in their aspiration to join the Trans-At-
lantic community of democracies.
‘‘(2) To assist the people of Belarus in building the
sovereignty and independence of their country.
‘‘(3) To encourage free, fair, and transparent presi-
dential,
parliamentary,
and
local
elections
in
Belarus, conducted in a manner consistent with
internationally accepted standards and under the su-
Page 1704
TITLE 22—FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE
§ 5811
pervision of internationally recognized observers and
independent domestic observers.
‘‘(4) To assist in the development of a democratic
political culture and civil society in Belarus.
‘‘(b) AUTHORIZATION FOR ASSISTANCE.—To carry out
the purposes of subsection (a), the President is author-
ized to furnish assistance and other support for the ac-
tivities described in subsection (c), to be provided pri-
marily for indigenous Belarusian groups and Belarusian
groups outside of Belarus that are committed to the
support of democratic processes and Belarusian sov-
ereignty.
‘‘(c) ACTIVITIES SUPPORTED.—Activities that may be
supported by assistance under subsection (b) include—
‘‘(1) expanding independent radio and television
broadcasting to and within Belarus;
‘‘(2) facilitating the development of independent
broadcast, print, and Internet media working within
Belarus and from locations outside the country and
supported by nonstate-controlled printing facilities;
‘‘(3) countering internet censorship and repressive
surveillance technology that seek to limit free asso-
ciation, control access to information, and prevent
citizens from exercising their rights to free speech;
‘‘(4) aiding the development of civil society through
assistance to nongovernmental organizations pro-
moting democracy and supporting human rights, in-
cluding youth groups, entrepreneurs, and independent
trade unions;
‘‘(5) supporting the work of human rights defenders;
‘‘(6) enhancing the development of democratic po-
litical parties;
‘‘(7) assisting the promotion of free, fair, and trans-
parent electoral processes;
‘‘(8) enhancing international exchanges and ad-
vanced professional training programs for leaders and
members of the democratic forces in skill areas cen-
tral to the development of civil society;
‘‘(9) supporting the work of women advocating free-
dom, human rights, and human progress;
‘‘(10) supporting the development of Belarusian lan-
guage education;
‘‘(11) enhancing the development of the private sec-
tor, particularly the information technology sector,
and its role in the economy of Belarus, including by
increasing the capacity of private sector actors, de-
veloping business support organizations, offering en-
trepreneurship training, and expanding access to fi-
nance for small and medium enterprises;
‘‘(12) supporting political refugees in neighboring
European countries fleeing the crackdown in Belarus;
‘‘(13) supporting the gathering of evidence on and
investigating of the human rights abuses in Belarus;
‘‘(14) supporting the public health response, includ-
ing filling the information void, in Belarus during the
COVID–19 pandemic; and
‘‘(15) other activities consistent with the purposes
of this Act.
‘‘(d) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress
that, in light of the political crisis in Belarus and the
unprecedented mobilization of the Belarusian people,
United States foreign assistance to Belarusian civil so-
ciety should be reevaluated and increased—
‘‘(1) to carry out the purposes described in sub-
section (a); and
‘‘(2) to include the activities described in sub-
section (c).
‘‘(e) COORDINATION
WITH
EUROPEAN
PARTNERS.—In
order to maximize impact, eliminate duplication, and
further the achievement of the purposes described in
subsection (a), the Secretary of State shall ensure co-
ordination with the European Union and its institu-
tions, the governments of countries that are members
of the European Union, the United Kingdom, and Can-
ada.
‘‘(f) REPORT ON ASSISTANCE.—Not later than 1 year
after the date of the enactment of the Belarus Democ-
racy, Human Rights, and Sovereignty Act of 2020 [Dec.
27, 2020], the Secretary of State, acting through the Of-
fice of the Coordinator of U.S. Assistance to Europe
and Eurasia, and in coordination with the Adminis-
trator of the United States Agency for International
Development, shall submit a report to the appropriate
congressional committees describing the programs and
activities carried out to achieve the purposes described
in subsection (a), including an assessment of whether
or not progress was made in achieving those purposes.
‘‘(g) AUTHORIZATION
OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There are
authorized to be appropriated to the President to carry
out this section such sums as may be necessary for
each of the fiscal years 2021 and 2022.
‘‘SEC. 5. INTERNATIONAL BROADCASTING, INTER-
NET FREEDOM, AND ACCESS TO INFORMATION
IN BELARUS.
‘‘(a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress
that—
‘‘(1) the President should support and reallocate re-
sources to radio, television, and internet broad-
casting conducted by Radio Free Europe/Radio Lib-
erty in languages spoken in Belarus;
‘‘(2) the United States should also support other
independent media providing objective information
to
the
Belarusian
people,
particularly
in
the
Belarusian language;
‘‘(3) the President should provide the United States
Agency for Global Media with a surge capacity (as
such term is defined in section 316 of the United
States International Broadcasting Act [of 1994] (22
U.S.C. 6216)) for programs and activities in Belarus;
‘‘(4) the Chief Executive Officer of the United
States Agency for Global Media, working through the
Open Technology Fund and in coordination with the
Secretary of State, should expand and prioritize ef-
forts to provide anti-censorship technology and serv-
ices to journalists and civil society in Belarus in
order to enhance their ability to safely access or
share digital news and information without fear of re-
percussions or surveillance; and
‘‘(5) the United States should continue to condemn
the Belarusian authorities’ crackdown on inde-
pendent media, including the harassment and mass
detentions of independent and foreign journalists and
the denial of accreditation.
‘‘(b) STRATEGY TO PROMOTE EXPANDED BROADCASTING,
INTERNET FREEDOM, AND ACCESS
TO INFORMATION
IN
BELARUS.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 120 days after the
date of the enactment of the Belarus Democracy,
Human Rights, and Sovereignty Act of 2020 [Dec. 27,
2020], the Chief Executive Officer of the United States
Agency for Global Media and the Secretary of State
shall jointly submit to the appropriate congressional
committees a comprehensive strategy, including a
cost estimate, to carry out the following:
‘‘(A) Expand independent radio, television, live
stream, and social network broadcasting and com-
munications in Belarus to provide news and infor-
mation, particularly in the Belarusian language,
that is credible, comprehensive, and accurate.
‘‘(B) Support the development and use of anti-
censorship and circumvention technologies by the
Open Technology Fund and the Bureau of Democ-
racy Human Rights and Labor that enable the citi-
zens of Belarus to communicate securely and under-
take internet activities without interference from
the Government of Belarus.
‘‘(C) Assist efforts to overcome attempts by the
Government of Belarus to disrupt internet access
and block content online.
‘‘(D) Monitor the cooperation of the Government
of Belarus with any foreign government or organi-
zation for purposes related to the censorship or sur-
veillance of the internet, including an assessment
of any such cooperation in the preceding ten years.
‘‘(E) Monitor the purchase or receipt by the Gov-
ernment of Belarus of any technology or training
from any foreign government or organization for
purposes related to the censorship or surveillance
of the internet, including an assessment of any
such purchase or receipt in the preceding ten years.
Page 1705
TITLE 22—FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE
§ 5811
‘‘(F) Assist with the protection of journalists who
have been targeted for free speech activities, in-
cluding through the denial of accreditation.
‘‘(G) Provide cyber-attack mitigation services to
civil society organizations in Belarus.
‘‘(H) Provide resources for educational materials
and training on digital literacy, bypassing internet
censorship, digital safety, and investigative and an-
alytical journalism for independent journalists
working in Belarus.
‘‘(I) Build the capacity of civil society, media,
and other nongovernmental and organizations to
identify, track, and counter disinformation, includ-
ing from proxies of the Government of Russia work-
ing at Belarusian state television.
‘‘(2) FORM.—The report required under paragraph (1)
shall be transmitted in unclassified form, but may
contain a classified annex.
‘‘SEC. 6. SANCTIONS AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT
OF BELARUS.
‘‘(a) APPLICATION OF SANCTIONS.—The sanctions de-
scribed in subsections (c) through (f) should apply with
respect to the Republic of Belarus until the President
determines and certifies to the appropriate congres-
sional committees that the Government of Belarus has
made significant progress in meeting the conditions de-
scribed in subsection (b).
‘‘(b) CONDITIONS.—The conditions referred to in sub-
section (a) are the following:
‘‘(1) The release of individuals in Belarus who have
been jailed based on political or religious beliefs or
expression, including those individuals jailed based
on political beliefs or expression in connection with
repression that attended the presidential election of
August 9, 2020.
‘‘(2) The withdrawal of politically motivated legal
charges against all opposition activists, peaceful pro-
testers, and independent journalists in Belarus, in-
cluding politically motivated legal charges made in
connection with repression that attended the presi-
dential election of August 9, 2020.
‘‘(3) The cessation of all forms of harassment and
repression against the independent media, inde-
pendent trade unions, nongovernmental organiza-
tions, youth groups, religious organizations (includ-
ing their leadership and members), and the political
opposition in Belarus.
‘‘(4) The prosecution of senior leadership of the
Government of Belarus responsible for the adminis-
tration of fraudulent elections and violations of
human rights, including violations of human rights
committed in connection with the presidential elec-
tion of August 9, 2020.
‘‘(5) The holding of free, fair and transparent presi-
dential and parliamentary elections in Belarus con-
sistent with OSCE standards and under the super-
vision of OSCE observers and independent domestic
observers.
‘‘(c) DENIAL OF ENTRY INTO THE UNITED STATES OF
SENIOR LEADERSHIP OF THE GOVERNMENT OF BELARUS
AND RUSSIAN INDIVIDUALS COMPLICIT IN THE CRACKDOWN
THAT OCCURRED AFTER THE AUGUST 9, 2020, ELECTION.—
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Presi-
dent may exercise the authority under section 212(f) of
the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(f))
to deny the entry into the United States of any alien
who—
‘‘(1) holds a position in the senior leadership of the
Government of Belarus;
‘‘(2) is an immediate family member of a person in-
admissible under paragraph (1);
‘‘(3) through his or her business dealings with sen-
ior leadership of the Government of Belarus derives
significant financial benefit from policies or actions,
including electoral fraud, human rights abuses, or
corruption, that undermine or injure democratic in-
stitutions or impede the transition to democracy in
Belarus;
‘‘(4) is a member of the Central Election Commis-
sion of Belarus or assisted the Commission in manip-
ulating the presidential election of August 9, 2020;
‘‘(5) is a member of any branch of the security or
law enforcement services of Belarus, including the
KGB, Interior Ministry, and OMON special police
unit, and is responsible for, or complicit in, ordering,
controlling, materially assisting, sponsoring, or pro-
viding financial, material, or technological support
for, or otherwise directing, the crackdown on opposi-
tion leaders, journalists, and peaceful protestors that
occurred in connection with the presidential election
of August 9, 2020; or [sic]
‘‘(6) is a member of any branch of the security or
law enforcement services of Belarus and has partici-
pated in the persecution or harassment of religious
groups, human rights defenders, democratic opposi-
tion groups, or independent media or journalists.[;]
‘‘(7) is a government official, including at the Infor-
mation Ministry, responsible for the crackdown on
independent media, including revoking the accredita-
tion of journalists, disrupting internet access, and re-
stricting online content;
‘‘(8) is an official in the so-called ‘Union State’ be-
tween Russia and Belarus (regardless of nationality
of the individual); or
‘‘(9) is a Russian individual that has significantly
participated in the crackdown on independent press
or human rights abuses related to political repression
in Belarus, including the Russian propagandists sent
to replace local employees at Belarusian state media
outlets.
‘‘(d) PROHIBITION ON LOANS AND INVESTMENT.—
‘‘(1) UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT FINANCING.—It is
the sense of Congress that no loan, credit guarantee,
insurance, financing, or other similar financial as-
sistance should be extended by any agency of the
Government of the United States (including the Ex-
port-Import Bank of the United States and the
United States International Development Finance
Corporation) to the Government of Belarus, except
with respect to the provision of humanitarian goods
and agricultural or medical products.
‘‘(2) TRADE
AND
DEVELOPMENT
AGENCY.—It is the
sense of Congress that no funds available to the
Trade and Development Agency should be available
for activities of the Agency in or for Belarus.
‘‘(e) MULTILATERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE.—The Sec-
retary of the Treasury should instruct the United
States Executive Director at each international finan-
cial institution of which the United States is a member
to use the voice and vote of the United States to oppose
any extension by those institutions of any financial as-
sistance to the Government of Belarus, except for loans
and assistance that serve humanitarian needs.
‘‘(f) BLOCKING OF ASSETS AND OTHER PROHIBITED AC-
TIVITIES.—
‘‘(1) BLOCKING OF ASSETS.—It is the sense of Con-
gress that the President should block all property
and interests in property, including all commercial,
industrial, or public utility undertakings or entities,
that, on or after the date of the enactment of the
Belarus Democracy Reauthorization Act of 2006 [Jan.
12, 2007]—
‘‘(A) are owned, in whole or in part, by the Gov-
ernment of Belarus, or by the senior leadership of
the Government of Belarus or by any member or
family member closely linked to the senior leader-
ship of the Government of Belarus, or an official of
the so-called ‘Union State’ with Russia, or any per-
son who through his or her business dealings with
senior leadership of the Government of Belarus de-
rives significant financial benefit from policies or
actions, including electoral fraud, human rights
abuses, or corruption, that undermine or injure
democratic institutions or impede the transition to
democracy in Belarus; and
‘‘(B) are in the United States, or in the possession
or control of the Government of the United States
or of any United States financial institution, in-
cluding any branch or office of such financial insti-
tution that is located outside the United States.
‘‘(2) PROHIBITED
ACTIVITIES.—Activities prohibited
by reason of the blocking of property and interests in
property under paragraph (1) should include—
Page 1706
TITLE 22—FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE
§ 5811
‘‘(A) payments or transfers of any property, or
any transactions involving the transfer of anything
of economic value by any United States person, to
the Government of Belarus, to any person or entity
acting for or on behalf of, or owned or controlled,
directly or indirectly, by that government, or to
any member of the senior leadership of the Govern-
ment of Belarus, or an official of the so-called
‘Union State’ with Russia;
‘‘(B) the export or reexport to any entity owned,
controlled, or operated by the Government of
Belarus, or the so-called ‘Union State’ with Russia,,
[sic] directly or indirectly, of any goods, tech-
nology, or services, either—
‘‘(i) by a United States person; or
‘‘(ii) involving the use of any air carrier or a
vessel documented under the laws of the United
States; and
‘‘(C) the performance by any United States person
of any contract, including a contract providing a
loan or other financing, in support of an industrial,
commercial, or public utility operated, controlled,
or owned by the Government of Belarus.
‘‘(3) PAYMENT OF EXPENSES.—All expenses incident
to the blocking and maintenance of property blocked
under paragraph (1) should be charged to the owners
or operators of such property. Such expenses may not
be paid from blocked funds.
‘‘(4) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this sub-
section shall be construed to prohibit any contract or
other financial transaction with any private or non-
governmental organization or business in Belarus.
‘‘(5) EXCEPTIONS.—Paragraphs (1) and (2) do not
apply to—
‘‘(A) assistance authorized under section 4 or 5 of
this Act; or
‘‘(B) medicine, medical equipment or supplies,
food, as well as any other form of humanitarian as-
sistance provided to Belarus as relief in response to
a humanitarian crisis.
‘‘(6) PENALTIES.—Any person who violates any pro-
hibition or restriction imposed under this subsection
should be subject to the penalties under section 6
[206] of the International Emergency Economic Pow-
ers Act (50 U.S.C. 1705) to the same extent as for a
violation under that Act [50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.].
‘‘(7) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection:
‘‘(A) AIR CARRIER.—The term ‘air carrier’ has the
meaning given that term in section 40102 of title 49,
United States Code.
‘‘(B) UNITED
STATES
PERSON.—The term ‘United
States person’ means—
‘‘(i) any United States citizen or alien admitted
for permanent residence to the United States;
‘‘(ii) any entity organized under the laws of the
United States; and
‘‘(iii) any person in the United States.
‘‘SEC. 7. MULTILATERAL COOPERATION.
‘‘It is the sense of Congress that the President should
continue to coordinate with the European Union and
its institutions, European Union member states, the
United Kingdom, and Canada to develop a comprehen-
sive, multilateral strategy—
‘‘(1) to further the purposes of this Act, including,
as appropriate, encouraging other countries to take
measures with respect to the Republic of Belarus that
are similar to measures described in this Act; and
‘‘(2) to deter the Government of the Russian Fed-
eration from undermining democratic processes and
institutions in Belarus or threatening the independ-
ence,
sovereignty,
and
territorial
integrity
of
Belarus.
‘‘SEC. 8. REPORTS.
‘‘(a) REPORT ON THREAT TO SOVEREIGNTY AND INDE-
PENDENCE OF BELARUS.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 120 days after the
date of the enactment of the Belarus Democracy,
Human Rights, and Sovereignty Act of 2020 [Dec. 27,
2020], the Secretary of State, in coordination with the
Director of National Intelligence and the Secretary
of the Treasury, shall transmit to the appropriate
congressional committees a report describing the
threat that the Government of Russia poses to the
sovereignty and independence of Belarus.
‘‘(2) MATTERS TO BE INCLUDED.—The report required
under paragraph (1) shall include—
‘‘(A) an assessment of how the Government of
Russia is exploiting the current political crisis in
Belarus to push for deeper political and economic
control of or integration with Belarus;
‘‘(B) a description of the economic and energy as-
sets in Belarus that the Government of Russia, in-
cluding Russian state-owned or state-controlled
companies, controls;
‘‘(C) a description of Belarus major enterprises
that are vulnerable of being taken over by Russian
entities amid the country’s worsening financial cri-
sis;
‘‘(D) a description of how and to what ends the
Government of Russia seeks to augment its mili-
tary presence in Belarus;
‘‘(E) a description of Russian influence over the
media and information space in Belarus and how
the Government of Russia uses disinformation and
other malign techniques to undermine Belarusian
history, culture, and language;
‘‘(F) a description of other actors in Belarus that
the Government of Russia uses to advance its ma-
lign influence, including veterans’ organizations
and extrajudicial networks;
‘‘(G) a description of efforts to undermine
Belarusian language, cultural, and national sym-
bols, including the traditional red and white flag
and the ‘Pahonia’ mounted knight; and
‘‘(H) the identification of Russian individuals and
government agencies that are significantly sup-
porting or involved in the crackdown on peaceful
protestors and the opposition or the repression of
independent media following the August 9, 2020,
presidential election.
‘‘(3) FORM.—The report required under this sub-
section shall be transmitted in unclassified form, but
may contain a classified annex.
‘‘(b) REPORT
ON PERSONAL ASSETS
OF ALYAKSANDR
LUKASHENKA.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the
date of the enactment of the Belarus Democracy,
Human Rights, and Sovereignty Act of 2020 [Dec. 27,
2020], the Director of National Intelligence, in con-
sultation with the Secretary of the Treasury and the
Secretary of State, shall submit to the appropriate
congressional committees a report describing—
‘‘(A) the total assets under the direct or indirect
control of Alyaksandr Lukashenka, including esti-
mated assets and known sources of income of
Alyaksandr Lukashenka and his immediate family
members, including assets, investments, bank ac-
counts, and other business interests; and
‘‘(B) an identification of the most significant sen-
ior foreign political figures in Belarus, as deter-
mined
by
their
closeness
to
Alyaksandr
Lukashenka.
‘‘(2) WAIVER.—The Director of National Intelligence
may waive, in whole or in part, the reporting require-
ment under paragraph (1)(A) if the Director submits
to the appropriate congressional committees—
‘‘(A) a written justification stating that the waiv-
er is in the national interest of the United States;
and
‘‘(B) a detailed explanation of the reasons there-
for.
‘‘(3) FORM.—The report required under this sub-
section shall be transmitted in unclassified form, but
may contain a classified annex.
‘‘SEC. 9. DEFINITIONS.
‘‘In this Act:
‘‘(1) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES.—The
term ‘appropriate congressional committees’ means—
Page 1707
TITLE 22—FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE
§ 5812
‘‘(A) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the
Senate;
‘‘(B) the Committee on Banking, Housing, and
Urban Affairs of the Senate;
‘‘(C) the Committee on Appropriations of the Sen-
ate;
‘‘(D) the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the
House of Representatives;
‘‘(E) the Committee on Financial Services of the
House of Representatives; and
‘‘(F) the Committee on Appropriations of the
House of Representatives.
‘‘(2) OSCE.—The term ‘OSCE’ means the Organiza-
tion for Security and Cooperation in Europe.
‘‘(3) SENIOR
LEADERSHIP
OF
THE
GOVERNMENT
OF
BELARUS.—The term ‘senior leadership of the Govern-
ment of Belarus’ includes—
‘‘(A) the President, Prime Minister, Deputy
Prime Ministers, government ministers, Chairmen
of State Committees, governors, heads of state en-
terprises, and members of the Presidential Admin-
istration of Belarus;
‘‘(B) any official of the Government of Belarus
who—
‘‘(i) is personally and substantially involved in
the suppression of freedom in Belarus, including
judges, prosecutors, members of the security and
intelligence services, and heads of professional as-
sociations and educational institutions; or
‘‘(ii) is otherwise engaged in public corruption,
electoral fraud, online censorship, or restrictions
on independent media and journalists in Belarus;
and
‘‘(C) any other individual determined by the Sec-
retary of State (or the Secretary’s designee) to be
personally and substantially involved in the formu-
lation or execution of the policies of the Govern-
ment of Belarus that are in contradiction of inter-
nationally recognized human rights standards.’’
[Pub. L. 109–480, § 4(c)(2), Jan. 12, 2007, 120 Stat. 3668,
provided that: ‘‘The amendment made by paragraph (1)
[amending section 4(d)(1) of Pub. L. 108–347, set out in
the note above] shall not be construed to affect the
availability of funds appropriated pursuant to the au-
thorization of appropriations under section 4(d) of the
Belarus Democracy Act of 2004 [Pub. L. 108–347] (as re-
designated) before the date of the enactment of this
Act [Jan. 12, 2007].’’]
PRESIDENTIAL REPORT ON FUNDING FOR NEW
INDEPENDENT STATES OF FORMER SOVIET UNION
Pub. L. 103–306, title II, Aug. 23, 1994, 108 Stat. 1617,
provided in part that: ‘‘(o) The report required by sub-
section (d) under the heading ‘Assistance for the New
Independent States of the Former Soviet Union’, con-
tained in Public Law 102–391 [set out below], shall be
updated at least annually and shall also contain a list-
ing of all grants and contracts issued from funds appro-
priated annually for the new independent states of the
former Soviet Union, to include for each grant and con-
tract (1) a description of its purpose, (2) its amount,
and (3) the country where the grant or contract funds
are to be expended.’’
Pub. L. 102–391, title III, Oct. 6, 1992, 106 Stat. 1650,
provided in part that: ‘‘(d) REPORTS.—The President
shall submit a report to the Committees on Appropria-
tions containing the amount of funds obligated and ex-
pended for each project and subproject funded from
amounts appropriated under this heading for the new
independent states of the former Soviet Union. The re-
port required by this subsection shall be submitted to
the Committees on Appropriations no later than Janu-
ary 1, 1993, and an update of this report shall be sub-
mitted by the President to those Committees no later
than July 1, 1993.’’
§ 5812. Program coordination, implementation,
and oversight
(a) Coordination
The President shall designate, within the De-
partment of State, a coordinator who shall be
responsible for—
(1) designing an overall assistance and eco-
nomic cooperation strategy for the inde-
pendent states of the former Soviet Union;
(2) ensuring program and policy coordina-
tion among agencies of the United States Gov-
ernment in carrying out the policies set forth
in this Act (including the amendments made
by this Act and chapter 12 of part I of the For-
eign Assistance Act of 1961 [22 U.S.C. 2296 et
seq.]);
(3) pursuing coordination with other coun-
tries and international organizations with re-
spect to assistance to independent states;
(4) ensuring that United States assistance
programs for the independent states are con-
sistent with this Act (including the amend-
ments made by this Act and chapter 12 of part
I of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 [22
U.S.C. 2296 et seq.]);
(5) ensuring proper management, implemen-
tation, and oversight by agencies responsible
for assistance programs for the independent
states; and
(6) resolving policy and program disputes
among United States Government agencies
with respect to United States assistance for
the independent states.
(b) Export promotion activities
Consistent with subsection (a), coordination of
activities related to the promotion of exports of
United States goods and services to the inde-
pendent states of the former Soviet Union shall
continue to be primarily the responsibility of
the Secretary of Commerce, in the Secretary’s
role as Chair of the Trade Promotion Coordina-
tion Committee.
(c) International economic activities
Consistent with subsection (a), coordination of
activities relating to United States participa-
tion in international financial institutions and
relating to organization of multilateral efforts
aimed at currency stabilization, currency con-
vertibility, debt reduction, and comprehensive
economic reform programs shall continue to be
primarily the responsibility of the Secretary of
the Treasury, in the Secretary’s role as Chair of
the National Advisory Council on International
Monetary and Financial Policies and as the
United States Governor of the international fi-
nancial institutions.
(d) Accountability for funds
Any agency managing and implementing an
assistance program for the independent states of
the former Soviet Union shall be accountable for
any funds made available to it for such program.
(Pub. L. 102–511, title I, § 102, Oct. 24, 1992, 106
Stat. 3322; Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, § 1000(a)(2)
[title V, § 596(c)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1535,
1501A–126.)
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
The President is authorized to cooperate with and assist any nation or group of nations in the general area of the Middle East desiring such assistance in the development of economic strength dedicated to the maintenance of national independence.
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 22 U.S.C. § 1961
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 22 U.S.C. § 1961. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 485
TITLE 22—FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE
§ 1961
AMENDMENTS
1963—Pub. L. 88–205 substituted ‘‘$680,000,000’’ for
‘‘$500,000,000’’.
Executive Documents
DELEGATION OF FUNCTIONS
For delegation of certain functions of President
under this section, see Memorandum of President of the
United States, May 30, 2001, 66 F.R. 30629, set out as a
note under section 1942 of this title.
§ 1944. Reconstruction assistance in Chile; au-
thorization of appropriations
There is authorized to be appropriated to the
President not to exceed $100,000,000, which shall
remain available until expended, for use, in ad-
dition to other funds available for such pur-
poses, in the reconstruction and rehabilitation
of Chile on such terms and conditions as the
President may specify.
(Pub. L. 86–735, § 3, Sept. 8, 1960, 74 Stat. 870.)
Editorial Notes
CODIFICATION
This section was not enacted as part of the Mutual
Security Act of 1954 which comprises this chapter.
Executive Documents
DELEGATION OF FUNCTIONS
For delegation of certain functions of President
under this section, see Memorandum of President of the
United States, May 30, 2001, 66 F.R. 30629, set out as a
note under section 1942 of this title.
§ 1945. Utilization of funds for assistance in Latin
America; availability for transportation of
immigrants from Ryukyuan Archipelago
(a) Funds appropriated under sections 1943 and
1944 of this title may be used for assistance
under sections 1942 to 1945 of this title pursuant
to such provisions applicable to the furnishing
of such assistance contained in any successor
Act to the Mutual Security Act of 1954, as
amended, as the President determines to be nec-
essary to carry out the purposes for which such
funds are appropriated.
(b) Of the funds appropriated unde
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 22 U.S.C. § 1961
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 22 U.S.C. § 1961. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
The Secretary of the Treasury shall direct the United States Executive Director of the Bank to use the voice and vote of the United States to support an increased focus on the poorest countries in Latin America and the Caribbean, and on poorer areas of better off countries, and to support programs conducted by the Multilateral Investment Fund, particularly in targeting low-income countries and populations, working with nongovernmental organizations and training and assisting former combatants from civil conflicts in Latin America.
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 22 U.S.C. § 286aa
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 22 U.S.C. § 286aa. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 190
TITLE 22—FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE
§ 286z
(2) instruct the United States Executive Di-
rector of the Fund to work for adoption of
policies in the Fund, both within the frame-
work of article IV (of the Articles of Agree-
ment of the Fund) consultations and with re-
spect to the conditions associated with Fund-
supported balance of payments adjustments
programs, which promote conditions contrib-
uting to the stability of exchange rates and
avoid the manipulation of exchange rates be-
tween major currencies. Among other initia-
tives, the Secretary of the Treasury shall pro-
pose strengthening the article IV consultation
procedures of the Fund to attempt to ensure
that countries which are artificially maintain-
ing undervalued or overvalued rates of ex-
change agree to adopt market determined ex-
change rates.
(b) In determining his vote on extensions of
assistance to any Fund borrower, the United
States Executive Director of the Fund shall
take into account whether such borrower’s poli-
cies are consistent with the requirements of ar-
ticle IV of the Articles of Agreement of the
Fund.
(July 31, 1945, ch. 339, § 40, as added Pub. L.
98–181, title I [title VIII, § 801], Nov. 30, 1983, 97
Stat. 1267.)
§ 286z. Collection and exchange of information
on monetary and financial problems
(a) Sense of Congress
It is the sense of the Congress that—
(1) the lack of sufficient information cur-
rently available to allow members of the Fund
to make sound and prudent decisions con-
cerning their public and private sector inter-
national borrowing, and to allow lenders to
make sound and prudent decisions concerning
their international lending, threatens the sta-
bility of the international monetary system;
and
(2) in recognition of the Fund’s duties
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 22 U.S.C. § 286aa
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 22 U.S.C. § 286aa. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
The Secretary may appoint the members of the Service (other than the members of the Service who are in the personnel categories specified in [section 3942(a) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title22-section3942/a&num=0&edition=prelim)) in accordance with this chapter and such regulations as the Secretary may prescribe.
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 22 U.S.C. § 3943
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 22 U.S.C. § 3943. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 1438
TITLE 22—FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE
§ 3943
By virtue of the authority vested in me by the Con-
stitution and the statutes, including the Foreign Serv-
ice Act of 1980 (94 Stat. 2071), as amended [this chapter],
and as President of the United States and Commander
in Chief of the armed forces of the United States, it is
ordered as follows:
1. Executive Order No. 10062 of June 6, 1949, and Exec-
utive Order No. 10144 of July 21, 1950, amending that
order, are hereby revoked, and the position of United
States High Commissioner for Germany, established by
that order, is hereby abolished.
2. The Chief of the United States Diplomatic Mission
to the Federal Republic of Germany, hereinafter re-
ferred to as the Chief of Mission, shall have supreme
authority, except as otherwise provided herein, with re-
spect to all responsibilities, duties, and governmental
functions of the United States in all Germany. The
Chief of Mission shall exercise his authority under the
supervision of the Secretary of State and subject to ul-
timate direction by the President.
3. The United States Military Commander having
area responsibility in Germany, hereinafter referred to
as the Commander, shall have authority with respect
to all military responsibilities, duties, and functions of
the United States in all Germany, including the com-
mand, security, and stationing of United States forces
in Germany, the assertion and exercise of their rights
and discharge of their obligations therein, and emer-
gency measures which he may consider essential for
their protection or the accomplishment of his mission.
The Commander may delegate the authority conferred
upon him. If action by the Commander or any rep-
resentative of the Commander, pursuant to the author-
ity here
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 22 U.S.C. § 3943
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 22 U.S.C. § 3943. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
For purposes of this subchapter—
(1) the term “contractor” means a National Aeronautics and Space Administration contractor to the extent that the acquisition of space hardware, space technology, or space services from the independent states of the former Soviet Union may be relevant to the contractor’s responsibilities under the contract; and
(2) the term “designated congressional committees” means the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate.
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 22 U.S.C. § 5801
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 22 U.S.C. § 5801. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 1695
TITLE 22—FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE
§ 5801
1 See References in Text note below.
the chairman of the Committee on Foreign Relations of
the Senate’’, and added subsecs. (b) and (c).
2002—Pub. L. 107–115 substituted ‘‘March 31, 2000,
March 31, 2001, March 31, 2002, March 31, 2003, March 31,
2004, March 31, 2005, and March 31, 2006’’ for ‘‘and March
31, 2000,’’ in introductory provisions.
1996—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 104–107 inserted ‘‘March 31,
1996,’’ after ‘‘March 31, 1995,’’ in introductory provi-
sions.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EXTENSION OF REPORTING TIME
Pub. L. 107–115, title V, § 586(b), Jan. 10, 2002, 115 Stat.
2173, provided that: ‘‘The requirement in section 301 of
the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act [22 U.S.C.
5731], as amended by subsection (a), that a report under
that section shall be transmitted not later than March
31, 2001, shall be considered satisfied by the transmittal
of such report by August 7, 2001.’’
REPORT ON SINO-BRITISH JOINT DECLARATION ON
QUESTION OF HONG KONG
Pub. L. 104–208, div. A, title I, § 101(c) [title V, § 571],
Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–121, 3009–167, which directed
that the additional report required to be submitted
during 1997 under this section include detailed informa-
tion on the status of, and other developments affecting,
implementation of the Sino-British Joint Declaration
on the Question of Hong Kong, was from the Foreign
Operations, Export Financing, and Related Programs
Appropriations Act, 1997, and was not repeated in sub-
sequent appropriations acts. Similar provisions were
contained in the following prior appropriation act:
Pub. L. 104–107, title V, § 576(b), Feb. 12, 1996, 110 Stat.
750.
§ 5732. Separate part of country reports
Whenever a report is trans
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 22 U.S.C. § 5801
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 22 U.S.C. § 5801. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
For purposes of this Act, the terms “independent states of the former Soviet Union” and “independent states” mean the following: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Russia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, and Uzbekistan.
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 22 U.S.C. § 5811
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a)** As used in this chapter—
(1) The term “administrator” means the official designated by the Secretary of State pursuant to [section 1104(b) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title8-section1104/b&num=0&edition=prelim).
(2) The term “advocates” includes, but is not limited to, advises, recommends, furthers by overt act, and admits belief in.
(3) The term “alien” means any person not a citizen or national of the United States.
(4) The term “application for admission” has reference to the application for admission into the United States and not to the application for the issuance of an immigrant or nonimmigrant visa.
(5) The term “Attorney General” means the Attorney General of the United States.
(6) The term “border crossing identification card” means a document of identity bearing that designation issued to an alien who is lawfully admitted for permanent residence, or to an alien who is a resident in foreign contiguous territory, by a consular officer or an immigration officer for the purpose of crossing over the borders between the United States and foreign contiguous territory in accordance with such conditions for its issuance and use as may be prescribed by regulations. Such regulations shall provide that (A) each such document include a biometric identifier (such as the fingerprint or handprint of the alien) that is machine readable and (B) an alien presenting a border crossing identification card is not permitted to cross over the border into the United States unless the biometric identifier contained on the card matches the appropriate biometric characteristic of the alien.
(7) The term “clerk of court” means a clerk of a naturalization court.
(8) The terms “Commissioner” and “Deputy Commissioner” mean the Co
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 8 U.S.C. § 1101
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 8 U.S.C. § 1101. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.