Arkansas Legal Resource Navigator

28 U.S.C. § 138 — Terms abolished

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

28 U.S.C. § 138 — Terms abolished

The district court shall not hold formal terms.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 28 U.S.C. § 138

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.

Original supplied file — preserved unchanged

Download original Markdown file

File SHA-256: c2909a81fa7141f22b1d32ceca600ed2e1ae3703d1ceff36a72a1df4f276f2dc. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.

Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.

Open the recorded source website ↗

Record provenance

Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:record_usc_ed77a6ea9b6caf2496cbafde
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code/title-28/section-138-terms-abolished--6bcd03421c.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: c7bfadde9769d6b6a6314418470b6a57ceda2354c163b1f83eb495ff27983e5a

Source location: Title 28, Chapter 5, § 138; chapter-005-district-courts.md

Stored source content

The district court shall not hold formal terms.

Cross-references

Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

28 U.S.C. § 101 — Massachusetts

Massachusetts constitutes one judicial district.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 28 U.S.C. § 101

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Incoming connection: Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

28 U.S.C. § 111 — New Mexico

New Mexico constitutes one judicial district.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 28 U.S.C. § 111

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Incoming connection: Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

28 U.S.C. § 174 — Assignment of judges; decisions

**(a)** The judicial power of the United States Court of Federal Claims with respect to any action, suit, or proceeding, except congressional reference cases, shall be exercised by a single judge, who may preside alone and hold a regular or special session of court at the same time other sessions are held by other judges. **(b)** All decisions of the Court of Federal Claims shall be preserved and open to inspection.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 28 U.S.C. § 174

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Incoming connection: Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

28 U.S.C. § 85 — Colorado

Colorado constitutes one judicial district.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 28 U.S.C. § 85

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Incoming connection: Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

28 U.S.C. § 138 — Terms abolished

Page 75 TITLE 28—JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE § 140 ent and plant variety protection cases among the district judges of the district courts so designated; ‘‘(B) an analysis of the extent to which the pro- gram has improved the efficiency of the courts in- volved by reason of such expertise; ‘‘(C) with respect to patent cases handled by the judges designated pursuant to subsection (a)(1)(A) and judges not so designated, a comparison between the 2 groups of judges with respect to— ‘‘(i) the rate of reversal by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, of such cases on the issues of claim construction and substantive pat- ent law; and ‘‘(ii) the period of time elapsed from the date on which a case is filed to the date on which trial be- gins or summary judgment is entered; ‘‘(D) a discussion of any evidence indicating that litigants select certain of the judicial districts des- ignated under subsection (b) in an attempt to en- sure a given outcome; and ‘‘(E) an analysis of whether the pilot program should be extended to other district courts, or should be made permanent and apply to all district courts. ‘‘(2) TIMETABLE FOR REPORTS.—The times referred to in paragraph (1) are— ‘‘(A) not later than the date that is 5 years and 3 months after the end of the 6-month period de- scribed in subsection (b); and ‘‘(B) not later than 5 years after the date de- scribed in subparagraph (A). ‘‘(3) PERIODIC REPORTS.—The Director of the Admin- istrative Office of the United States Courts, in con- sultation with the chief judge of each of the district courts designated under subsection (b) and the Direc- tor of the Federal Judicial Center, shall keep the committees referred to in paragraph (1) informed, on a periodic basis while the pilot program is in effec

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 28 U.S.C. § 138

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.