Arkansas Legal Resource Navigator

28 U.S.C. § 85 — Colorado

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

28 U.S.C. § 85 — Colorado

Colorado constitutes one judicial district.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 28 U.S.C. § 85

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.

Original supplied file — preserved unchanged

Download original Markdown file

File SHA-256: a8ab464f47d7abe80730d3069c4d48e354bde7474cf66b8ab6ddec810ecd7b69. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.

Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.

Open the recorded source website ↗

Record provenance

Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:record_usc_36f3ed5c947156249e467299
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code/title-28/section-85-colorado--7c1a3008d4.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 49d3a8d5470307227fb990ba0d31666c84b805c5a45f3de82b75b7f204256331

Source location: Title 28, Chapter 5, § 85; chapter-005-district-courts.md

Stored source content

Colorado constitutes one judicial district.

Cross-references

Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

28 U.S.C. § 138 — Terms abolished

The district court shall not hold formal terms.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 28 U.S.C. § 138

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

16 U.S.C. § 117a, 117b — Repealed. June 25, 1948, ch. 646, § 39, 62 Stat. 992, eff. Sept. 1, 1948

### Statutory Notes Section 117a, act Apr. 25, 1928, ch. 434, § 2, 45 Stat. 459, related to inclusion of park in a judicial district. See [section 85 of Title 28](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title28-section85&num=0&edition=prelim), Judiciary and Judicial Procedure. Section 117b, act Apr. 25, 1928, ch. 434, § 3, 45 Stat. 459, related to applicability of Colorado laws to offenses. See [section 13 of Title 18](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title18-section13&num=0&edition=prelim), Crimes and Criminal Procedure.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 16 U.S.C. § 117a, 117b

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Incoming connection: Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

16 U.S.C. § 198a, 198b — Repealed. June 25, 1948, ch. 646, § 39, 62 Stat. 992, eff. Sept. 1, 1948

### Statutory Notes Section 198a, act Mar. 2, 1929, ch. 583, § 2, 45 Stat. 1537, related to inclusion of park in a judicial district. See [section 85 of Title 28](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title28-section85&num=0&edition=prelim), Judiciary and Judicial Procedure. Section 198b, act Mar. 2, 1929, ch. 583, § 3, 45 Stat. 1537, related to punishment for offenses. See [section 18 of Title 18](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title18-section18&num=0&edition=prelim), Crimes and Criminal Procedure.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 16 U.S.C. § 198a, 198b

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Incoming connection: Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

28 U.S.C. § 112 — New York

New York is divided into four judicial districts to be known as the Northern, Southern, Eastern, and Western Districts of New York.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 28 U.S.C. § 112

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Incoming connection: Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

28 U.S.C. § 124 — Texas

Texas is divided into four judicial districts to be known as the Northern, Southern, Eastern, and Western Districts of Texas.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 28 U.S.C. § 124

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Incoming connection: Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

28 U.S.C. § 126 — Vermont

Vermont constitutes one judicial district.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 28 U.S.C. § 126

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Incoming connection: Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

28 U.S.C. § 90 — Georgia

Georgia is divided into three judicial districts to be known as the Northern, Middle, and Southern Districts of Georgia.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 28 U.S.C. § 90

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Incoming connection: Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

28 U.S.C. § 93 — Illinois

Illinois is divided into three judicial districts to be known as the Northern, Central, and Southern Districts of Illinois.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 28 U.S.C. § 93

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Incoming connection: Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

28 U.S.C. § 85 — Colorado

Page 28 TITLE 28—JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE § 85 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—This Act [amending this section and enacting provisions set out below] and the amend- ments made by this Act shall take effect 6 months after the date of the enactment of this Act [Aug. 26, 1992]. ‘‘(b) PENDING CASES NOT AFFECTED.—This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall not affect any ac- tion commenced before the effective date of this Act and pending in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on such date. ‘‘(c) JURIES NOT AFFECTED.—This Act and the amend- ments made by this Act shall not affect the composi- tion, or preclude the service, of any grand or petit jury summoned, empaneled, or actually serving in the Cen- tral Judicial District of California on the effective date of this Act.’’ EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1980 AMENDMENT; SAVINGS PROVISION Pub. L. 96–462, § 7, Oct. 15, 1980, 94 Stat. 2054, provided that: ‘‘(a) This Act and the amendments made by this Act [amending this section and sections 95, 105, 113, and 124 of this title and enacting provisions set out as notes under this section and sections 95, 105, and 113 of this title] shall take effect on October 1, 1981. ‘‘(b) Nothing in this Act shall affect the composition or preclude the service of any grand or petit juror sum- moned, empaneled, or actually serving in any judicial district on the effective date of this Act [Oct. 1, 1981].’’ EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1966 AMENDMENT Pub. L. 89–372, § 3(i), Mar. 18, 1966, 80 Stat. 77, provided that: ‘‘The provisions of this section [amending this section and enacting provisions set out as a note under this section and section 133 of this title] shall become effective six months after the date of enactment of this Act [Mar. 18, 1966].’’ CONGR

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 28 U.S.C. § 85

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.