Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
28 U.S.C. § 126 — Vermont
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Vermont constitutes one judicial district.
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 28 U.S.C. § 126
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: 32f27440bac2e66da99b98e49e1c64f726d99f7996cbd912e1d8709ba304aec7. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:record_usc_b7b94ebd117b0c86337cb4fc
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code/title-28/section-126-vermont--5290d6c0bf.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 304df0a5a5f843cabbb9049965ffaf70229dba2b9fb88e4be58d678bfa7e77f2
Source location: Title 28, Chapter 5, § 126; chapter-005-district-courts.md
Stored source content
Vermont constitutes one judicial district.
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Colorado constitutes one judicial district.
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 28 U.S.C. § 85
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 54
TITLE 28—JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE
§ 125
1 So in original.
ties comprising the Brownsville Division of the South-
ern District.
Subsec. (b)(7). Pub. L. 98–620, § 407(a)(3), added par. (7).
1980—Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 96–462, § 6(a), struck out
references to Polk and Trinity counties in list of coun-
ties comprising Houston Division of Southern District.
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 96–462, § 6(b), in provisions pre-
ceding par. (1) substituted ‘‘seven’’ for ‘‘six’’; in par. (1)
struck
out
references
to
Angelina,
Houston,
Nacogdoches, and Shelby counties in list of counties
comprising Tyler Division of Eastern District; in par.
(2) struck out references to Sabine, San Augustine, and
Tyler counties in list of counties comprising Beaumont
Division of Eastern District; and added par. (7).
1967—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 90–216, § 1(4), enlarged from
six to seven the number of divisions comprising West-
ern District.
Subsec. (d)(3). Pub. L. 90–216, § 1(1), transferred coun-
ties of Brewster, Culberson, Hudspeth, and Presidio
from El Paso Division to Pecos Division.
Subsec. (d)(6). Pub. L. 90–216, § 1(2), added counties of
Brewster, Culberson, Hudspeth, and Presidio to Pecos
Division from El Paso Division, and transferred coun-
ties of Andrews, Crane, Ector, Martin, Midland, and
Upton from Pecos Division to Midland-Odessa Division.
Subsec. (d)(7). Pub. L. 90–216, § 1(3), added par. (7),
which created Midland-Odessa Division, comprised of
counties of Andrews, Crane, Ector, Martin, Midland,
and Upton, transferred from Pecos Division.
1964—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 88–282, § 1(a), struck out
Austin, Fort Bend, and Wharton counties from list
comprising Galveston Division.
Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 88–282, § 1(b), added Austin,
Fort Bend, and Wharton
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 28 U.S.C. § 126
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.