Arkansas Legal Resource Navigator

28 U.S.C. § 126 — Vermont

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

28 U.S.C. § 126 — Vermont

Vermont constitutes one judicial district.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 28 U.S.C. § 126

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.

Original supplied file — preserved unchanged

Download original Markdown file

File SHA-256: 32f27440bac2e66da99b98e49e1c64f726d99f7996cbd912e1d8709ba304aec7. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.

Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.

Open the recorded source website ↗

Record provenance

Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:record_usc_b7b94ebd117b0c86337cb4fc
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code/title-28/section-126-vermont--5290d6c0bf.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 304df0a5a5f843cabbb9049965ffaf70229dba2b9fb88e4be58d678bfa7e77f2

Source location: Title 28, Chapter 5, § 126; chapter-005-district-courts.md

Stored source content

Vermont constitutes one judicial district.

Cross-references

Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

28 U.S.C. § 85 — Colorado

Colorado constitutes one judicial district.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 28 U.S.C. § 85

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

28 U.S.C. § 126 — Vermont

Page 54 TITLE 28—JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE § 125 1 So in original. ties comprising the Brownsville Division of the South- ern District. Subsec. (b)(7). Pub. L. 98–620, § 407(a)(3), added par. (7). 1980—Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 96–462, § 6(a), struck out references to Polk and Trinity counties in list of coun- ties comprising Houston Division of Southern District. Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 96–462, § 6(b), in provisions pre- ceding par. (1) substituted ‘‘seven’’ for ‘‘six’’; in par. (1) struck out references to Angelina, Houston, Nacogdoches, and Shelby counties in list of counties comprising Tyler Division of Eastern District; in par. (2) struck out references to Sabine, San Augustine, and Tyler counties in list of counties comprising Beaumont Division of Eastern District; and added par. (7). 1967—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 90–216, § 1(4), enlarged from six to seven the number of divisions comprising West- ern District. Subsec. (d)(3). Pub. L. 90–216, § 1(1), transferred coun- ties of Brewster, Culberson, Hudspeth, and Presidio from El Paso Division to Pecos Division. Subsec. (d)(6). Pub. L. 90–216, § 1(2), added counties of Brewster, Culberson, Hudspeth, and Presidio to Pecos Division from El Paso Division, and transferred coun- ties of Andrews, Crane, Ector, Martin, Midland, and Upton from Pecos Division to Midland-Odessa Division. Subsec. (d)(7). Pub. L. 90–216, § 1(3), added par. (7), which created Midland-Odessa Division, comprised of counties of Andrews, Crane, Ector, Martin, Midland, and Upton, transferred from Pecos Division. 1964—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 88–282, § 1(a), struck out Austin, Fort Bend, and Wharton counties from list comprising Galveston Division. Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 88–282, § 1(b), added Austin, Fort Bend, and Wharton

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 28 U.S.C. § 126

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.