Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
New Mexico constitutes one judicial district.
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 28 U.S.C. § 111
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: a6527099a8bbc61ff5f296c35170cdbc206eb8c65507ce92eccb961f4e933eb1. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:record_usc_147ddbde4e964be30b6b25a4
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code/title-28/section-111-new-mexico--635392e3d3.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: df476a3a35e1b434c90a704a57adc84e13551d4a2837f0434c0b96a499373417
Source location: Title 28, Chapter 5, § 111; chapter-005-district-courts.md
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
### Statutory Notes Section, acts June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 898; Oct. 9, 1962, Pub. L. 87–764, 76 Stat. 762; Nov. 19, 1977, Pub. L. 95–196, 91 Stat. 1420, related to the providing of accommodations at places for holding court. See [section 462 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title28-section462&num=0&edition=prelim). #### Effective Date of Repeal Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as an Effective Date of 1982 Amendment note under [section 171 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title28-section171&num=0&edition=prelim). #### Waiver of Limitations and Restrictions The limitations and restrictions contained in this section prior to its repeal were waived with respect to the holding of court at certain places by the following Acts: Pub. L. 87–833, Oct. 15, 1962, 76 Stat. 959, related to Akron, Ohio. Pub. L. 87–699, Sept. 25, 1962, 76 Stat. 598, related to Richland, Washington. Pub. L. 87–562, § 4, July 30, 1962, 76 Stat. 248, related to Fort Myers, Saint Petersburg, Fort Pierce, and West Palm Beach, Florida. Pub. L. 87–560, July 27, 1962, 76 Stat. 247, related to Marshall, Texas. Pub. L. 87–559, July 27, 1962, 76 Stat. 246, related to Decatur, Alabama. Pub. L. 87–553, July 27, 1962, 76 Stat. 222, related to Winchester, Tennessee. Pub. L. 87–551, July 27, 1962, 76 Stat. 221, related to Bridgeport, Connecticut. Pub. L. 87–337, Oct. 3, 1961, 75 Stat. 750, related to Lafayette, Louisiana. Pub. L. 87–36, § 3(g), May 19, 1961, 75 Stat. 83, related to Kalamazoo, Michigan; Fayetteville, North Carolina; and Dyersburg, Tennessee. Pub. L. 86–366, Sept. 22, 1959, 73 Stat. 647, related to Durant, Oklahoma. Act July 20, 1956, ch. 657, 70 Stat. 594
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 28 U.S.C. § 142
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a)** For the convenience of parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or division where it might have been brought or to any district or division to which all parties have consented. **(b)** Upon motion, consent or stipulation of all parties, any action, suit or proceeding of a civil nature or any motion or hearing thereof, may be transferred, in the discretion of the court, from the division in which pending to any other division in the same district. Transfer of proceedings in rem brought by or on behalf of the United States may be transferred under this section without the consent of the United States where all other parties request transfer. **(c)** A district court may order any civil action to be tried at any place within the division in which it is pending. **(d)** Transfers from a district court of the United States to the District Court of Guam, the District Court for the Northern Mariana Islands, or the District Court of the Virgin Islands shall not be permitted under this section. As otherwise used in this section, the term “district court” includes the District Court of Guam, the District Court for the Northern Mariana Islands, and the District Court of the Virgin Islands, and the term “district” includes the territorial jurisdiction of each such court.
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 28 U.S.C. § 1404
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
The district court shall not hold formal terms.
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 28 U.S.C. § 138
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Applicability of Section.—** Except as otherwise provided by law— (1) this section shall govern the venue of all civil actions brought in district courts of the United States; and (2) the proper venue for a civil action shall be determined without regard to whether the action is local or transitory in nature. **(b) Venue in General.—** A civil action may be brought in— (1) a judicial district in which any defendant resides, if all defendants are residents of the State in which the district is located; (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of property that is the subject of the action is situated; or (3) if there is no district in which an action may otherwise be brought as provided in this section, any judicial district in which any defendant is subject to the court’s personal jurisdiction with respect to such action. **(c) Residency.—** For all venue purposes— (1) a natural person, including an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States, shall be deemed to reside in the judicial district in which that person is domiciled; (2) an entity with the capacity to sue and be sued in its common name under applicable law, whether or not incorporated, shall be deemed to reside, if a defendant, in any judicial district in which such defendant is subject to the court’s personal jurisdiction with respect to the civil action in question and, if a plaintiff, only in the judicial district in which it maintains its principal place of business; and (3) a defendant not resident in the United States may be sued in any judicial district, and the joinder of such a defendant shall be disregarded in determining where the action may be brought with respect
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Incoming connection: Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 43 TITLE 28—JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE § 112 1 So in original. ‘‘Plattsburgh’’ appears twice. Provisions for furnishing rooms and accommodations at the various places for holding court were omitted as obsolete upon advice of Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts that Federal accom- modations are now available at such places. A provision relating to the appointment and resi- dence of deputy clerks and the places for keeping of- fices was omitted as covered by section 751 of this title. The county of Arthur in the North Platte Division was created since the enactment of the Judicial Code. Changes in arrangement and phraseology were made. Editorial Notes AMENDMENTS 1955—Act Aug. 9, 1955, struck out the separate divi- sions of the district and reduced the number of places of holding terms. Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1955 AMENDMENT Act Aug. 9, 1955, ch. 627, § 2, 69 Stat. 546, provided that: ‘‘The amendment made by the first section of this Act [amending this section] shall take effect on Sep- tember 1, 1955.’’ § 108. Nevada Nevada constitutes one judicial district. Court shall be held at Carson City, Elko, Las Vegas, Reno, Ely, and Lovelock. (June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 885; Pub. L. 101–650, title III, § 324(a)(1), Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5120.) HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., § 174 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, § 94, 36 Stat. 1118; June 24, 1930, ch. 595, 46 Stat. 806; Nov. 15, 1945, ch. 482, 59 Stat. 582). Changes in arrangement and phraseology were made. Editorial Notes AMENDMENTS 1990—Pub. L. 101–650 substituted ‘‘, Reno, Ely, and Lovelock’’ for ‘‘and Reno’’. § 109. New Hampshire New Hampshire constitutes one judicial dis- trict. Court
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 28 U.S.C. § 111
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.