Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
31 U.S.C. § 3352 — Estimates of improper payments and reports on actions to reduce improper payments
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Identification of Susceptible Programs and Activities.—**
(1) **In general.—** — The head of each executive agency shall, in accordance with guidance prescribed by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget—
(A) periodically review all programs and activities that the head of the executive agency administers; and
(B) identify all programs and activities with outlays exceeding the statutory threshold dollar amount described in paragraph (3)(A)(i) that may be susceptible to significant improper payments.
(2) **Frequency.—** — A review under paragraph (1) shall be performed for each program and activity that the head of an executive agency administers not less frequently than once every 3 fiscal years.
(3) **Risk assessments.—**
(A) *Definition of significant.—* — In this paragraph, the term “significant” means that, in the preceding fiscal year, the sum of a program or activity’s improper payments and payments whose propriety cannot be determined by the executive agency due to lacking or insufficient documentation may have exceeded—
(i) $10,000,000 of all reported program or activity payments of the executive agency made during that fiscal year and 1.5 percent of program outlays; or
(ii) $100,000,000.
(B) *Scope.—* — In conducting a review under paragraph (1), the head of each executive agency shall take into account those risk factors that are likely to contribute to a susceptibility to significant improper payments, such as—
(i) whether the program or activity reviewed is new to the executive agency;
(ii) the complexity of the program or activity reviewed;
(iii) the volume of payments made through the program or activity reviewed;
(iv) whether payments or payment eligibility decisions are made outside of the ex
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 31 U.S.C. § 3352
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: b43a2215b6062c67126a4e5cf4074332fb1999b332dd4bca6453a2a30a439c8b. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:record_usc_d30f688b07b2965dc7e6a2b8
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code/title-31/section-3352-estimates-of-improper-payments-and-reports-on-actions-to-reduce-improper--5255550e55.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 640f7af8b7a5e4cab15b74f9aa3d1403f9c68bf62bc9c710972fdfa2af878577
Source location: Title 31, Chapter 33, § 3352; chapter-033-depositing-keeping-and-paying-money.md
Stored source content
**(a) Identification of Susceptible Programs and Activities.—**
(1) **In general.—** — The head of each executive agency shall, in accordance with guidance prescribed by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget—
(A) periodically review all programs and activities that the head of the executive agency administers; and
(B) identify all programs and activities with outlays exceeding the statutory threshold dollar amount described in paragraph (3)(A)(i) that may be susceptible to significant improper payments.
(2) **Frequency.—** — A review under paragraph (1) shall be performed for each program and activity that the head of an executive agency administers not less frequently than once every 3 fiscal years.
(3) **Risk assessments.—**
(A) *Definition of significant.—* — In this paragraph, the term “significant” means that, in the preceding fiscal year, the sum of a program or activity’s improper payments and payments whose propriety cannot be determined by the executive agency due to lacking or insufficient documentation may have exceeded—
(i) $10,000,000 of all reported program or activity payments of the executive agency made during that fiscal year and 1.5 percent of program outlays; or
(ii) $100,000,000.
(B) *Scope.—* — In conducting a review under paragraph (1), the head of each executive agency shall take into account those risk factors that are likely to contribute to a susceptibility to significant improper payments, such as—
(i) whether the program or activity reviewed is new to the executive agency;
(ii) the complexity of the program or activity reviewed;
(iii) the volume of payments made through the program or activity reviewed;
(iv) whether payments or payment eligibility decisions are made outside of the executive agency, such as by a State or local government;
(v) recent major changes in program funding, authorities, practices, or procedures;
(vi) the level, experience, and quality of training for personnel responsible for making program eligibility determinations or certifying that payments are accurate;
(vii) significant deficiencies in the audit report of the executive agency or other relevant management findings that might hinder accurate payment certification;
(viii) similarities to other programs or activities that have reported improper payment estimates or been deemed susceptible to significant improper payments;
(ix) the accuracy and reliability of improper payment estimates previously reported for the program or activity, or other indicator of potential susceptibility to improper payments identified by the Inspector General of the executive agency, the Government Accountability Office, other audits performed by or on behalf of the Federal, State, or local government, disclosures by the executive agency, or any other means;
(x) whether the program or activity lacks information or data systems to confirm eligibility or provide for other payment integrity needs; and
(xi) the risk of fraud as assessed by the executive agency under the Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government published by the Government Accountability Office (commonly known as the “Green Book”).
(C) *Annual report.—* — Each executive agency shall publish an annual report that includes—
(i) a listing of each program or activity identified under paragraph (1), including the date on which the program or activity was most recently assessed for risk under paragraph (1); and
(ii) a listing of any program or activity for which the executive agency makes any substantial changes to the methodologies of the reviews conducted under paragraph (1).
**(b) Improving the Determination of Improper Payments.—**
(1) **In general.—** — The Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall on an annual basis—
(A) identify a list of high-priority Federal programs for greater levels of oversight and review—
(i) in which the highest dollar value or highest rate of improper payments occur; or
(ii) for which there is a higher risk of improper payments; and
(B) in coordination with the executive agency responsible for administering a high-priority program identified under subparagraph (A), establish annual targets and semi-annual or quarterly actions for reducing improper payments associated with the high-priority program.
(2) **Report on high-priority improper payments.—**
(A) *In general.—* — Subject to Federal privacy policies and to the extent permitted by law, each executive agency with a program identified under paragraph (1)(A) shall on an annual basis submit to the Inspector General of the executive agency and the Office of Management and Budget, and make available to the public, including through a website, a report on that program.
(B) *Contents.—* — Each report submitted under subparagraph (A)—
(i) shall describe any action the executive agency—
(I) has taken or plans to take to recover improper payments; and
(II) intends to take to prevent future improper payments; and
(ii) shall not include—
(I) any referrals the executive agency made or anticipates making to the Department of Justice; or
(II) any information provided in connection with a referral described in subclause (I).
(C) *Public availability on central website.—* — The Office of Management and Budget shall make each report submitted under subparagraph (A) available on a central website.
(D) *Availability of information to inspector general.—* — Subparagraph (B)(ii) shall not prohibit any referral or information being made available to an Inspector General as otherwise provided by law.
(E) *Assessment and recommendations.—* — The Inspector General of each executive agency that submits a report under subparagraph (A) shall, for each program of the executive agency that is identified under paragraph (1)(A)—
(i) review—
(I) the assessment of the level of risk associated with the program and the quality of the improper payment estimates and methodology of the executive agency relating to the program; and
(II) the oversight or financial controls to identify and prevent improper payments under the program; and
(ii) submit to the appropriate authorizing and appropriations committees of Congress recommendations, which may be included in another report submitted by the Inspector General to Congress, for modifying any plans of the executive agency relating to the program, including improvements for improper payments determination and estimation methodology.
(F) *Annual meeting.—* — Not less frequently than once every year, the head of each executive agency with a program identified under paragraph (1)(A), or a designee of the head of the executive agency, shall meet with the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, or a designee of the Director, to report on actions taken during the preceding year and planned actions to prevent improper payments.
**(c) Estimation of Improper Payments.—**
(1) **Estimation.—** — With respect to each program and activity identified under subsection (a)(1), the head of the relevant executive agency shall—
(A) produce a statistically valid estimate, or an estimate that is otherwise appropriate using a methodology approved by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, of the improper payments made under the program or activity; and
(B) include the estimates described in subparagraph (A) in the accompanying materials to the annual financial statement of the executive agency and as required in applicable guidance of the Office of Management and Budget.
(2) **Lacking or insufficient documentation.—**
(A) *In general.—* — For the purpose of producing an estimate under paragraph (1), when the executive agency cannot determine, due to lacking or insufficient documentation, whether a payment is proper or not, the payment shall be treated as an improper payment.
(B) *Separate report.—* — The head of an executive agency may report separately on what portion of the improper payments estimate for a program or activity of the executive agency under paragraph (1) is attributable to lacking or insufficient documentation.
**(d) Reports on Actions To Reduce Improper Payments.—** With respect to any program or activity of an executive agency with estimated improper payments under subsection (c), the head of the executive agency shall provide with the estimate required under subsection (c) a report on what actions the executive agency is taking to reduce improper payments, including—
(1) a description of the causes of the improper payments, actions planned or taken to correct those causes, and the planned or actual completion date of the actions taken to address those causes;
(2) in order to reduce improper payments to a level below which further expenditures to reduce improper payments would cost more than the amount those expenditures would save in prevented or recovered improper payments, a statement of whether the executive agency has what is needed with respect to—
(A) internal controls;
(B) human capital; and
(C) information systems and other infrastructure;
(3) if the executive agency does not have sufficient resources to establish and maintain effective internal controls as described in paragraph (2)(A), a description of the resources the executive agency has requested in the budget submission of the executive agency to establish and maintain those internal controls;
(4) program-specific and activity-specific improper payments reduction targets that have been approved by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget;
(5) a description of the steps the executive agency has taken to ensure that executive agency managers, programs, and, where appropriate, States and local governments are held accountable through annual performance appraisal criteria for—
(A) meeting applicable improper payments reduction targets; and
(B) establishing and maintaining sufficient internal controls, including an appropriate control environment, that effectively—
(i) prevent improper payments from being made; and
(ii) promptly detect and recover improper payments that are made; and
(6) a description of how the level of planned or completed actions by the executive agency to address the causes of the improper payments matches the level of improper payments, including a breakdown by category of improper payment and specific timelines for completion of those actions.
**(e) Reports on Actions To Recover Improper Payments.—** With respect to improper payments identified in a recovery audit, the head of the executive agency shall provide with the estimate required under subsection (c) a report on all actions the executive agency is taking to recover the improper payments, including—
(1) a discussion of the methods used by the executive agency to recover improper payments;
(2) the amounts recovered, outstanding, and determined to not be collectable, including the percent those amounts represent of the total improper payments of the executive agency;
(3) if a determination has been made that certain improper payments are not collectable, a justification of that determination;
(4) an aging schedule of the amounts outstanding;
(5) a summary of how recovered amounts have been disposed of;
(6) a discussion of any conditions giving rise to improper payments and how those conditions are being resolved; and
(7) if the executive agency has determined under subsection (i) that performing recovery audits for any applicable program or activity is not cost-effective, a justification for that determination.
**(f) Governmentwide Reporting of Improper Payments and Actions To Recover Improper Payments.—**
(1) **Report.—** — Each fiscal year, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall submit a report with respect to the preceding fiscal year on actions that executive agencies have taken to report information regarding improper payments and actions to recover improper payments to—
(A) the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate;
(B) the Committee on Oversight and Reform of the House of Representatives; and
(C) the Comptroller General of the United States.
(2) **Contents.—** — Each report required under paragraph (1) shall include—
(A) a summary of the reports of each executive agency on improper payments and recovery actions submitted under this section;
(B) an identification of the compliance status of each executive agency, as determined by the Inspector General of the executive agency under section 3353, to which this section applies;
(C) Governmentwide improper payment reduction targets;
(D) a Governmentwide estimate of improper payments; and
(E) a discussion of progress made towards meeting Governmentwide improper payment reduction targets.
**(g) Guidance by the Office of Management and Budget.—**
(1) **In general.—** — Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this section, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall prescribe guidance for executive agencies to implement the requirements of this section, which shall not include any exemptions to those requirements that are not specifically authorized by this section.
(2) **Contents.—** — The guidance under paragraph (1) shall prescribe—
(A) the form of the reports on actions to reduce improper payments, recovery actions, and Governmentwide reporting; and
(B) strategies for addressing risks and establishing appropriate prepayment and postpayment internal controls.
**(h) Determinations of Agency Readiness for Opinion on Internal Control.—** The criteria required to be developed under section 2(g) of the Improper Payments Elimination and Recovery Act of 2010, as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this section—
(1) shall continue to be in effect on and after the date of enactment of this section; and
(2) may be modified as determined appropriate by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget.
**(i) Recovery Audits.—**
(1) **In general.—**
(A) *Conduct of audits.—* — Except as provided under paragraph (3) and if not prohibited under any other provision of law, the head of each executive agency shall conduct recovery audits with respect to each program and activity of the executive agency that expends $1,000,000 or more annually if conducting the audits would be cost effective.
(B) *Procedures.—* — In conducting a recovery audit under this subsection, the head of an executive agency—
(i) shall give priority to the most recent payments and to payments made in any program identified as susceptible to significant improper payments under subsection (a);
(ii) shall implement this subsection in a manner designed to ensure the greatest financial benefit to the Federal Government; and
(iii) may conduct the recovery audit directly, by using other departments and agencies of the United States, or by procuring performance of recovery audits by private sector sources by contract, subject to the availability of appropriations, or by any combination thereof.
(C) *Recovery audit contracts.—* — With respect to a recovery audit procured by an executive agency by contract—
(i) subject to subparagraph (B)(iii), and except to the extent such actions are outside the authority of the executive agency under [section 7103 of title 41](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title41-section7103&num=0&edition=prelim), the head of the executive agency may authorize the contractor to—
(I) notify entities, including individuals, of potential overpayments made to those entities;
(II) respond to questions concerning potential overpayments; and
(III) take other administrative actions with respect to an overpayment claim made or to be made by the executive agency; and
(ii) the contractor shall not have the authority to make a final determination relating to whether any overpayment occurred or whether to compromise, settle, or terminate an overpayment claim.
(D) *Contract terms and conditions.—*
(i) *In general.—* — The executive agency shall include in each contract for procurement of performance of a recovery audit a requirement that the contractor shall—
(I) provide to the executive agency periodic reports on conditions giving rise to overpayments identified by the contractor and any recommendations on how to mitigate those conditions;
(II) notify the executive agency of any overpayments identified by the contractor pertaining to the executive agency or to any other executive agency that are beyond the scope of the contract; and
(III) report to the executive agency credible evidence of fraud or vulnerabilities to fraud and conduct appropriate training of personnel of the contractor on identification of fraud.
(ii) *Reports on actions taken.—* — Each executive agency shall, on an annual basis, include in annual financial statement of the executive agency a report on actions taken by the executive agency during the preceding fiscal year to address the recommendations described in clause (i)(I).
(E) *Agency action following notification.—* — Each executive agency shall—
(i) take prompt and appropriate action in response to a report or notification by a contractor under subclause (I) or (II) of subparagraph (D)(i) to collect an overpayment; and
(ii) forward to other executive agencies any information that applies to that executive agency.
(2) **Disposition of amounts recovered.—**
(A) *In general.—* — Amounts collected by executive agencies each fiscal year through recovery audits shall be treated in accordance with this paragraph.
(B) *Distribution.—* — The head of an executive agency shall determine the distribution of collected amounts described in subparagraph (A), less amounts needed to fulfill the purposes of [section 3562(a) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title31-section3562/a&num=0&edition=prelim), in accordance with subparagraphs (C), (D), and (E).
(C) *Use for financial management improvement program.—* — Not more than 25 percent of the amounts collected by an executive agency through recovery audits—
(i) shall be available to the head of the executive agency to carry out the financial management improvement program of the executive agency under paragraph (3);
(ii) may be credited, if applicable, for the purpose described in clause (i) by the head of an executive agency to any executive agency appropriations and funds that are available for obligation at the time of collection; and
(iii) shall be used to supplement and not supplant any other amounts available for the purpose described in clause (i) and shall remain available until expended.
(D) *Use for original purpose.—* — Not more than 25 percent of the amounts collected by an executive agency through recovery audits—
(i) shall be credited to the appropriation or fund, if any, available for obligation at the time of collection for the same general purposes as the appropriation or fund from which the overpayment was made;
(ii) shall remain available for the same period and purposes as the appropriation or fund to which credited; and
(iii) if the appropriation from which an overpayment was made has expired—
(I) in the case of recoveries of overpayments that are made from a trust or special fund account, shall revert to that account; and
(II) in the case of other recoveries of overpayments—
(aa) for amounts that are recovered more than 5 fiscal years from the last fiscal year in which the funds were available for obligation, shall be deposited in the Treasury as miscellaneous receipts; and
(bb) for other amounts, shall be newly available for the same time period as the funds were originally available for obligation.
(E) *Use for inspector general activities.—* — Not more than 5 percent of the amounts collected by an executive agency through recovery audits—
(i) shall be available to the Inspector General of that executive agency for—
(I) the Inspector General to carry out this Act; or
(II) any other activities of the Inspector General relating to investigating improper payments or auditing internal controls associated with payments; and
(ii) shall remain available for the same period and purposes as the appropriation or fund to which credited.
(F) *Remainder.—* — Amounts collected that are not applied in accordance with subparagraph (B), (C), (D), or (E) shall be deposited in the Treasury as miscellaneous receipts, except that in the case of recoveries of overpayments that are made from trust or special fund accounts, those amounts shall revert to those accounts.
(G) *Discretionary amounts.—* — This paragraph shall apply only to recoveries of overpayments that are made from discretionary appropriations, as defined in section 250(c)(7) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 ([2 U.S.C. 900(c)(7)](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title2-section900/c/7&num=0&edition=prelim)), and shall not apply to recoveries of overpayments that are made from discretionary amounts that were appropriated before the date of enactment of the Improper Payments Elimination and Recovery Act of 2010, as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this section.
(H) *Application.—* — This paragraph shall not apply to the recovery of an overpayment if the appropriation from which the overpayment was made has not expired.
(3) **Financial management improvement program.—**
(A) *Requirement.—* — The head of each executive agency shall conduct a financial management improvement program consistent with rules prescribed by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget.
(B) *Program features.—* — In conducting a program described in subparagraph (A), the head of an executive agency—
(i) shall, as the first priority of the program, address problems that contribute directly to executive agency improper payments; and
(ii) may seek to reduce errors and waste in other executive agency programs and operations.
(4) **Privacy protections.—** — Any nongovernmental entity that, in the course of recovery auditing or recovery activity under this subsection, obtains information that identifies an individual or with respect to which there is a reasonable basis to believe that the information can be used to identify an individual, may not disclose the information for any purpose other than the recovery auditing or recovery activity and governmental oversight of the activity, unless disclosure for that other purpose is authorized by the individual to the executive agency that contracted for the performance of the recovery auditing or recovery activity.
(5) **Rule of construction.—** — Except as provided under paragraph (4), nothing in this subsection shall be construed as terminating or in any way limiting authorities that are otherwise available to executive agencies under existing provisions of law to recover improper payments and use recovered amounts.
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Availability of Funds for Recovery Audits and Activities Program.—** Funds collected under a program carried out by an executive agency under [section 3352(i) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title31-section3352/i&num=0&edition=prelim) shall be available to the executive agency to reimburse the actual expenses incurred by the executive agency in the administration of the program.
**(b)** , (c). Repealed. Pub. L. 111–204, § 2(h)(6)(A)(i), July 22, 2010, 124 Stat. 2231.]
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 31 U.S.C. § 3562
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a)** Except as provided in this section or another law, only officers and employees of the Department of the Treasury designated by the Secretary of the Treasury as disbursing officials may disburse public money available for expenditure by an executive agency.
**(b)** For economy and efficiency, the Secretary may delegate the authority to disburse public money to officers and employees of other executive agencies.
**(c)** The head of each of the following executive agencies shall designate personnel of the agency as disbursing officials to disburse public money available for expenditure by the agency:
(1) United States Marshal’s Office.
(2) The Department of Defense.
(3) The Department of Homeland Security.11 So in original. The period probably should not appear. (with respect to public money available for expenditure by the Coast Guard when it is not operating as a service in the Navy).
**(d)** On request of the Secretary and with the approval of the head of an executive agency referred to in subsection (c) of this section, facilities of the agency may be used to assist in disbursing public money available for expenditure by another executive agency.
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 31 U.S.C. § 3321
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Establishment** There is established an Urban Area Security Initiative to provide grants to assist high-risk urban areas in preventing, preparing for, protecting against, and responding to acts of terrorism.
**(b) Assessment and designation of high-risk urban areas**
(1) **In general** — The Administrator shall designate high-risk urban areas to receive grants under this section based on procedures under this subsection.
(2) **Initial assessment**
(A) *In general* — For each fiscal year, the Administrator shall conduct an initial assessment of the relative threat, vulnerability, and consequences from acts of terrorism faced by each eligible metropolitan area, including consideration of—
(i) the factors set forth in subparagraphs (A) through (H) and (K) of [section 608(a)(1) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title6-section608/a/1&num=0&edition=prelim); and
(ii) information and materials submitted under subparagraph (B).
(B) *Submission of information by eligible metropolitan areas* — Prior to conducting each initial assessment under subparagraph (A), the Administrator shall provide each eligible metropolitan area with, and shall notify each eligible metropolitan area of, the opportunity to—
(i) submit information that the eligible metropolitan area believes to be relevant to the determination of the threat, vulnerability, and consequences it faces from acts of terrorism; and
(ii) review the risk assessment conducted by the Department of that eligible metropolitan area, including the bases for the assessment by the Department of the threat, vulnerability, and consequences from acts of terrorism faced by that eligible metropolitan area, and remedy erroneous or incomplete information.
(3) **Design
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 6 U.S.C. § 612
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Claims Generally.—**
(1) **Submission of contractor’s claims to contracting officer.—** — Each claim by a contractor against the Federal Government relating to a contract shall be submitted to the contracting officer for a decision.
(2) **Contractor’s claims in writing.—** — Each claim by a contractor against the Federal Government relating to a contract shall be in writing.
(3) **Contracting officer to decide federal government’s claims.—** — Each claim by the Federal Government against a contractor relating to a contract shall be the subject of a written decision by the contracting officer.
(4) **Time for submitting claims.—**
(A) *In general.—* — Each claim by a contractor against the Federal Government relating to a contract and each claim by the Federal Government against a contractor relating to a contract shall be submitted within 6 years after the accrual of the claim.
(B) *Exception.—* — Subparagraph (A) of this paragraph does not apply to a claim by the Federal Government against a contractor that is based on a claim by the contractor involving fraud.
(5) **Applicability.—** — The authority of this subsection and subsections (c)(1), (d), and (e) does not extend to a claim or dispute for penalties or forfeitures prescribed by statute or regulation that another Federal agency is specifically authorized to administer, settle, or determine.
**(b) Certification of Claims.—**
(1) **Requirement generally.—** — For claims of more than $100,000 made by a contractor, the contractor shall certify that—
(A) the claim is made in good faith;
(B) the supporting data are accurate and complete to the best of the contractor’s knowledge and belief;
(C) the amount requested accurately reflects the contract adjustment for which the contractor believes t
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 41 U.S.C. § 7103
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Payments**
(1) **In general** — Subject to the succeeding provisions of this section, the Secretary shall pay to each State with a plan approved under this subchapter, from its allotment under [section 1397dd of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title42-section1397dd&num=0&edition=prelim), an amount for each quarter equal to the enhanced FMAP (or, in the case of expenditures described in subparagraph (D)(iv), the higher of 75 percent or the sum of the enhanced FMAP plus 5 percentage points) of expenditures in the quarter—
(A) for child health assistance under the plan for targeted low-income children in the form of providing medical assistance for which payment is made on the basis of an enhanced FMAP under the fourth sentence of [section 1396d(b) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title42-section1396d/b&num=0&edition=prelim);
(B) [reserved]
(C) for child health assistance under the plan for targeted low-income children in the form of providing health benefits coverage that meets the requirements of [section 1397cc of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title42-section1397cc&num=0&edition=prelim); and
(D) only to the extent permitted consistent with subsection (c)—
(i) for payment for other child health assistance for targeted low-income children;
(ii) for expenditures for health services initiatives under the plan for improving the health of children (including targeted low-income children and other low-income children);
(iii) for expenditures for outreach activities as provided in [section 1397bb(c)(1) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title42-section1397bb/c/1&num=0&edition=pre
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 42 U.S.C. § 1397ee
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a)** The Secretary of the Treasury shall—
(1) receive and keep public money;
(2) take receipts for money paid out by the Secretary;
(3) give receipts for money deposited in the Treasury;
(4) endorse warrants for receipts for money deposited in the Treasury;
(5) submit the accounts of the Secretary to the Comptroller General every 3 months, or more often if required by the Comptroller General; and
(6) submit to inspection at any time by the Comptroller General of money in the possession of the Secretary.
**(b)** Except as provided in [section 3326 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title31-section3326&num=0&edition=prelim), an acknowledgment for money deposited in the Treasury is not valid if the Secretary does not endorse a warrant as required by subsection (a)(4) of this section.
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 31 U.S.C. § 3301
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Omitted**
**(b) General statement of budget enforcement through sequestration** This subchapter provides for budget enforcement as called for in House Concurrent Resolution 84 (105th Congress, 1st session).
**(c) Definitions** As used in this subchapter:
(1) The terms “budget authority”, “new budget authority”, “outlays”, and “deficit” have the meanings given to such terms in section 3 of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 [[2 U.S.C. 622](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title2-section622&num=0&edition=prelim)] and “discretionary spending limit” shall mean the amounts specified in [section 901 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title2-section901&num=0&edition=prelim).
(2) The terms “sequester” and “sequestration” refer to or mean the cancellation of budgetary resources provided by discretionary appropriations or direct spending law.
(3) The term “breach” means, for any fiscal year, the amount (if any) by which new budget authority or outlays for that year (within a category of discretionary appropriations) is above that category’s discretionary spending limit for new budget authority or outlays for that year, as the case may be.
(4)
(A) The term “nonsecurity category” means all discretionary appropriations not included in the security category defined in subparagraph (B).
(B) The term “security category” includes discretionary appropriations associated with agency budgets for the Department of Defense, the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Veterans Affairs, the National Nuclear Security Administration, the intelligence community management account (95–0401–0–1–054), and all budget accounts in budget function 150 (international affairs).
(C
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 2 U.S.C. § 900
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 2 U.S.C. § 900. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 232
TITLE 2—THE CONGRESS
§ 900
(2) Qualification
An individual, organization, institution, or
business may qualify for an award under this
section only if such individual, organization,
institution, or business—
(A) is nominated to the Majority or Minor-
ity Leader of the Senate or to the Speaker
or the Minority Leader of the House of Rep-
resentatives by a member of the Senate or
the House of Representatives;
(B) permits a rigorous evaluation by the
Office of Technology Assessment of the way
in which such individual, organization, insti-
tution, or business has demonstrated excel-
lence in promoting United States industrial
competitiveness; and
(C) meets such other requirements as the
selection panel determines to be appropriate
to achieve the objectives of this section.
(3) Evaluation
An evaluation of each nominee shall be con-
ducted by the Office of Technology Assess-
ment. The Office of Technology Assessment
shall work with the selection panel to estab-
lish appropriate procedures for evaluating
nominees.
(4) Panel review
The selection panel shall review the Office of
Technology Assessment’s evaluation of each
nominee and may, based on those evaluations,
recommend 1 award winner for each year for
each category described in subsection (b)(1) to
the Majority and Minority Leaders of the Sen-
ate and the Speaker and the Minority Leader
of the House of Representatives.
(d) Presentation of award
(1) In general
The Majority and Minority Leaders of the
Senate and the Speaker and the Minority
Leader of the House of Representatives shall
make the award to an individual and an orga-
nization, institution, or business that has
demonstrated excellence in promoting United
States industrial competitiveness in the inter-
national marketplace t
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 2 U.S.C. § 900
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 2 U.S.C. § 900. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 258
TITLE 31—MONEY AND FINANCE
§ 3352
Therefore, I hereby direct agencies to review current
pre-payment and pre-award procedures and ensure that
a thorough review of available databases with relevant
information on eligibility occurs before the release of
any Federal funds, to the extent permitted by law. At
a minimum, agencies shall, before payment and award,
check the following existing databases (where applica-
ble and permitted by law) to verify eligibility: the So-
cial Security Administration’s Death Master File, the
General Services Administration’s Excluded Parties
List System, the Department of the Treasury’s Debt
Check Database, the Department of Housing and Urban
Development’s Credit Alert System or Credit Alert
Interactive Voice Response System, and the Depart-
ment of Health and Human Services’ Office of Inspector
General’s List of Excluded Individuals/Entities. This
network of databases, and additional databases so des-
ignated by the Director of the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) in consultation with agencies, shall
be collectively known as the ‘‘Do Not Pay List.’’ This
memorandum requires agencies to review these data-
bases with the recognition that there may be cir-
cumstances when the law nevertheless requires a pay-
ment or award to be made to a recipient listed in them.
My Administration began coordination of the databases
discussed in this memorandum in April 2010 by launch-
ing the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity In-
formation System (FAPIIS), which integrates various
sources of information on the eligibility of Government
contractors for award. No later than 120 days of the
date of this memorandum, the Director of the OMB
shall provide to the President a plan for completing in-
tegration for the remaini
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 31 U.S.C. § 3352
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.