Arkansas Legal Resource Navigator

6 U.S.C. § 612 — Urban Area Security Initiative

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

6 U.S.C. § 612 — Urban Area Security Initiative

**(a) Establishment** There is established an Urban Area Security Initiative to provide grants to assist high-risk urban areas in preventing, preparing for, protecting against, and responding to acts of terrorism. **(b) Assessment and designation of high-risk urban areas** (1) **In general** — The Administrator shall designate high-risk urban areas to receive grants under this section based on procedures under this subsection. (2) **Initial assessment** (A) *In general* — For each fiscal year, the Administrator shall conduct an initial assessment of the relative threat, vulnerability, and consequences from acts of terrorism faced by each eligible metropolitan area, including consideration of— (i) the factors set forth in subparagraphs (A) through (H) and (K) of [section 608(a)(1) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title6-section608/a/1&num=0&edition=prelim); and (ii) information and materials submitted under subparagraph (B). (B) *Submission of information by eligible metropolitan areas* — Prior to conducting each initial assessment under subparagraph (A), the Administrator shall provide each eligible metropolitan area with, and shall notify each eligible metropolitan area of, the opportunity to— (i) submit information that the eligible metropolitan area believes to be relevant to the determination of the threat, vulnerability, and consequences it faces from acts of terrorism; and (ii) review the risk assessment conducted by the Department of that eligible metropolitan area, including the bases for the assessment by the Department of the threat, vulnerability, and consequences from acts of terrorism faced by that eligible metropolitan area, and remedy erroneous or incomplete information. (3) **Design

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 6 U.S.C. § 612

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.

Original supplied file — preserved unchanged

Download original Markdown file

File SHA-256: 83c1602834b98bc3cfb62116289dd3645c75d7e3392f0b48f5cc4f32dc22084d. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.

Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.

Open the recorded source website ↗

Record provenance

Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:record_usc_3a7ed8747b27489dfc07fca3
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code/title-6/section-612-urban-area-security-initiative--599efb8172.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 4879c923af738c3afac8253d1ef292a299bd30e2d5ca073c3cbbd6cc5aee3747

Source location: Title 6, Chapter 1, § 612; chapter-001-homeland-security-organization.md

Stored source content

**(a) Establishment** There is established an Urban Area Security Initiative to provide grants to assist high-risk urban areas in preventing, preparing for, protecting against, and responding to acts of terrorism. **(b) Assessment and designation of high-risk urban areas** (1) **In general** — The Administrator shall designate high-risk urban areas to receive grants under this section based on procedures under this subsection. (2) **Initial assessment** (A) *In general* — For each fiscal year, the Administrator shall conduct an initial assessment of the relative threat, vulnerability, and consequences from acts of terrorism faced by each eligible metropolitan area, including consideration of— (i) the factors set forth in subparagraphs (A) through (H) and (K) of [section 608(a)(1) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title6-section608/a/1&num=0&edition=prelim); and (ii) information and materials submitted under subparagraph (B). (B) *Submission of information by eligible metropolitan areas* — Prior to conducting each initial assessment under subparagraph (A), the Administrator shall provide each eligible metropolitan area with, and shall notify each eligible metropolitan area of, the opportunity to— (i) submit information that the eligible metropolitan area believes to be relevant to the determination of the threat, vulnerability, and consequences it faces from acts of terrorism; and (ii) review the risk assessment conducted by the Department of that eligible metropolitan area, including the bases for the assessment by the Department of the threat, vulnerability, and consequences from acts of terrorism faced by that eligible metropolitan area, and remedy erroneous or incomplete information. (3) **Designation of high-risk urban areas** (A) *Designation* (i) *In general* — For each fiscal year, after conducting the initial assessment under paragraph (2), and based on that assessment, the Administrator shall designate high-risk urban areas that may submit applications for grants under this section. (ii) *Additional areas* — Notwithstanding paragraph (2), the Administrator may— (I) in any case where an eligible metropolitan area consists of more than 1 metropolitan division (as that term is defined by the Office of Management and Budget) designate more than 1 high-risk urban area within a single eligible metropolitan area; and (II) designate an area that is not an eligible metropolitan area as a high-risk urban area based on the assessment by the Administrator of the relative threat, vulnerability, and consequences from acts of terrorism faced by the area. (iii) *Rule of construction* — Nothing in this subsection may be construed to require the Administrator to— (I) designate all eligible metropolitan areas that submit information to the Administrator under paragraph (2)(B)(i) as high-risk urban areas; or (II) designate all areas within an eligible metropolitan area as part of the high-risk urban area. (B) *Jurisdictions included in high-risk urban areas* (i) *In general* — In designating high-risk urban areas under subparagraph (A), the Administrator shall determine which jurisdictions, at a minimum, shall be included in each high-risk urban area. (ii) *Additional jurisdictions* — A high-risk urban area designated by the Administrator may, in consultation with the State or States in which such high-risk urban area is located, add additional jurisdictions to the high-risk urban area. **(c) Application** (1) **In general** — An area designated as a high-risk urban area under subsection (b) may apply for a grant under this section. (2) **Minimum contents of application** — In an application for a grant under this section, a high-risk urban area shall submit— (A) a plan describing the proposed division of responsibilities and distribution of funding among the local and tribal governments in the high-risk urban area; (B) the name of an individual to serve as a high-risk urban area liaison with the Department and among the various jurisdictions in the high-risk urban area; and (C) such information in support of the application as the Administrator may reasonably require. (3) **Annual applications** — Applicants for grants under this section shall apply or reapply on an annual basis. (4) **State review and transmission** (A) *In general* — To ensure consistency with State homeland security plans, a high-risk urban area applying for a grant under this section shall submit its application to each State within which any part of that high-risk urban area is located for review before submission of such application to the Department. (B) *Deadline* — Not later than 30 days after receiving an application from a high-risk urban area under subparagraph (A), a State shall transmit the application to the Department. (C) *Opportunity for State comment* — If the Governor of a State determines that an application of a high-risk urban area is inconsistent with the State homeland security plan of that State, or otherwise does not support the application, the Governor shall— (i) notify the Administrator, in writing, of that fact; and (ii) provide an explanation of the reason for not supporting the application at the time of transmission of the application. (5) **Opportunity to amend** — In considering applications for grants under this section, the Administrator shall provide applicants with a reasonable opportunity to correct defects in the application, if any, before making final awards. **(d) Distribution of awards** (1) **In general** — If the Administrator approves the application of a high-risk urban area for a grant under this section, the Administrator shall distribute the grant funds to the State or States in which that high-risk urban area is located. (2) **State distribution of funds** (A) *In general* — Not later than 45 days after the date that a State receives grant funds under paragraph (1), that State shall provide the high-risk urban area awarded that grant not less than 80 percent of the grant funds. Any funds retained by a State shall be expended on items, services, or activities that benefit the high-risk urban area. (B) *Funds retained* — A State shall provide each relevant high-risk urban area with an accounting of the items, services, or activities on which any funds retained by the State under subparagraph (A) were expended. (3) **Interstate urban areas** — If parts of a high-risk urban area awarded a grant under this section are located in 2 or more States, the Administrator shall distribute to each such State— (A) a portion of the grant funds in accordance with the proposed distribution set forth in the application; or (B) if no agreement on distribution has been reached, a portion of the grant funds determined by the Administrator to be appropriate. (4) **Certifications regarding distribution of grant funds to high-risk urban areas** — A State that receives grant funds under paragraph (1) shall certify to the Administrator that the State has made available to the applicable high-risk urban area the required funds under paragraph (2). **(e) Authorization of appropriations** There are authorized to be appropriated for grants under this section— (1) $850,000,000 for fiscal year 2008; (2) $950,000,000 for fiscal year 2009; (3) $1,050,000,000 for fiscal year 2010; (4) $1,150,000,000 for fiscal year 2011; (5) $1,300,000,000 for fiscal year 2012; and (6) such sums as are necessary for fiscal year 2013, and each fiscal year thereafter.

Cross-references

Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

31 U.S.C. § 3301 — General duties of the Secretary of the Treasury

**(a)** The Secretary of the Treasury shall— (1) receive and keep public money; (2) take receipts for money paid out by the Secretary; (3) give receipts for money deposited in the Treasury; (4) endorse warrants for receipts for money deposited in the Treasury; (5) submit the accounts of the Secretary to the Comptroller General every 3 months, or more often if required by the Comptroller General; and (6) submit to inspection at any time by the Comptroller General of money in the possession of the Secretary. **(b)** Except as provided in [section 3326 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title31-section3326&num=0&edition=prelim), an acknowledgment for money deposited in the Treasury is not valid if the Secretary does not endorse a warrant as required by subsection (a)(4) of this section.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 31 U.S.C. § 3301

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Incoming connection: Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

31 U.S.C. § 3352 — Estimates of improper payments and reports on actions to reduce improper payments

**(a) Identification of Susceptible Programs and Activities.—** (1) **In general.—** — The head of each executive agency shall, in accordance with guidance prescribed by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget— (A) periodically review all programs and activities that the head of the executive agency administers; and (B) identify all programs and activities with outlays exceeding the statutory threshold dollar amount described in paragraph (3)(A)(i) that may be susceptible to significant improper payments. (2) **Frequency.—** — A review under paragraph (1) shall be performed for each program and activity that the head of an executive agency administers not less frequently than once every 3 fiscal years. (3) **Risk assessments.—** (A) *Definition of significant.—* — In this paragraph, the term “significant” means that, in the preceding fiscal year, the sum of a program or activity’s improper payments and payments whose propriety cannot be determined by the executive agency due to lacking or insufficient documentation may have exceeded— (i) $10,000,000 of all reported program or activity payments of the executive agency made during that fiscal year and 1.5 percent of program outlays; or (ii) $100,000,000. (B) *Scope.—* — In conducting a review under paragraph (1), the head of each executive agency shall take into account those risk factors that are likely to contribute to a susceptibility to significant improper payments, such as— (i) whether the program or activity reviewed is new to the executive agency; (ii) the complexity of the program or activity reviewed; (iii) the volume of payments made through the program or activity reviewed; (iv) whether payments or payment eligibility decisions are made outside of the ex

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 31 U.S.C. § 3352

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Incoming connection: Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

6 U.S.C. § 111 — Definitions

In this chapter, the following definitions apply: (1) Each of the terms “American homeland” and “homeland” means the United States. (2) The term “appropriate congressional committee” means any committee of the House of Representatives or the Senate having legislative or oversight jurisdiction under the Rules of the House of Representatives or the Senate, respectively, over the matter concerned. (3) The term “assets” includes contracts, facilities, property, records, unobligated or unexpended balances of appropriations, and other funds or resources (other than personnel). (4) The term “critical infrastructure” has the meaning given that term in [section 5195c(e) of title 42](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title42-section5195c/e&num=0&edition=prelim). (5) The term “Department” means the Department of Homeland Security. (6) The term “emergency response providers” includes Federal, State, and local governmental and nongovernmental emergency public safety, fire, law enforcement, emergency response, emergency medical (including hospital emergency facilities), and related personnel, agencies, and authorities. (7) The term “EMP” means an electromagnetic pulse caused by a nuclear device or nonnuclear device, including such a pulse caused by an act of terrorism. (8) The term “executive agency” means an executive agency and a military department, as defined, respectively, in sections 105 and 102 of title 5. (9) The term “functions” includes authorities, powers, rights, privileges, immunities, programs, projects, activities, duties, and responsibilities. (10) The term “GMD” means a geomagnetic disturbance caused by a solar storm or another naturally occurring phenomenon. (11) The term “intelligence component of the Department” means any elem

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 6 U.S.C. § 111

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Incoming connection: Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

6 U.S.C. § 612 — Accountability

Page 313 TITLE 6—DOMESTIC SECURITY § 612 case may be, shall be a representative group of individuals from the counties, cities, towns, and Indian tribes within the State or high-risk urban area, including, as appro- priate, representatives of rural, high-popu- lation, and high-threat jurisdictions. (3) Existing planning committees Nothing in this subsection may be construed to require that any State or high-risk urban area create a State planning committee or urban area working group, as the case may be, if that State or high-risk urban area has es- tablished and uses a multijurisdictional plan- ning committee or commission that meets the requirements of this subsection. (c) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that, in order to en- sure that the Nation is most effectively able to prevent, prepare for, protect against, and re- spond to all hazards, including natural disasters, acts of terrorism, and other man-made disas- ters— (1) the Department should administer a co- herent and coordinated system of both ter- rorism-focused and all-hazards grants; (2) there should be a continuing and appro- priate balance between funding for terrorism- focused and all-hazards preparedness, as re- flected in the authorizations of appropriations for grants under the amendments made by ti- tles I and II, as applicable, of the Imple- menting Recommendations of the 9/11 Com- mission Act of 2007; and (3) with respect to terrorism-focused grants, it is necessary to ensure both that the target capabilities of the highest risk areas are achieved quickly and that basic levels of pre- paredness, as measured by the attainment of target capabilities, are achieved nationwide. (Pub. L. 107–296, title XX, § 2021, as added Pub. L. 110–53, title I, § 101, Aug. 3, 2007, 1

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 6 U.S.C. § 612

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.