Arkansas Legal Resource Navigator

31 U.S.C. § 3352 — Estimates of improper payments and re-

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

31 U.S.C. § 3352 — Estimates of improper payments and re-

Page 258 TITLE 31—MONEY AND FINANCE § 3352 Therefore, I hereby direct agencies to review current pre-payment and pre-award procedures and ensure that a thorough review of available databases with relevant information on eligibility occurs before the release of any Federal funds, to the extent permitted by law. At a minimum, agencies shall, before payment and award, check the following existing databases (where applica- ble and permitted by law) to verify eligibility: the So- cial Security Administration’s Death Master File, the General Services Administration’s Excluded Parties List System, the Department of the Treasury’s Debt Check Database, the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Credit Alert System or Credit Alert Interactive Voice Response System, and the Depart- ment of Health and Human Services’ Office of Inspector General’s List of Excluded Individuals/Entities. This network of databases, and additional databases so des- ignated by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in consultation with agencies, shall be collectively known as the ‘‘Do Not Pay List.’’ This memorandum requires agencies to review these data- bases with the recognition that there may be cir- cumstances when the law nevertheless requires a pay- ment or award to be made to a recipient listed in them. My Administration began coordination of the databases discussed in this memorandum in April 2010 by launch- ing the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity In- formation System (FAPIIS), which integrates various sources of information on the eligibility of Government contractors for award. No later than 120 days of the date of this memorandum, the Director of the OMB shall provide to the President a plan for completing in- tegration for the remaini

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 31 U.S.C. § 3352

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.

Original supplied file — preserved unchanged

Download original Markdown file

File SHA-256: b9cd463389feda947276a24a7e64afebdfc3c7b3b98822b0cee7205abf6626d8. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.

Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.

Open the recorded source website ↗

Record provenance

Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-b08151a6cbb7a23564fa6698
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-31/section-3352-estimates-of-improper-payments-and-re--4de1445776.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: eeec87fcab50789aae7cf4c1eb50b0d72bb9610607ae53a2a8699424276ca61a

Source location: USCODE-2024-title31-subtitleIII-chap33-subchapIV-sec3352.pdf

Stored source content

Page 258 TITLE 31—MONEY AND FINANCE § 3352 Therefore, I hereby direct agencies to review current pre-payment and pre-award procedures and ensure that a thorough review of available databases with relevant information on eligibility occurs before the release of any Federal funds, to the extent permitted by law. At a minimum, agencies shall, before payment and award, check the following existing databases (where applica- ble and permitted by law) to verify eligibility: the So- cial Security Administration’s Death Master File, the General Services Administration’s Excluded Parties List System, the Department of the Treasury’s Debt Check Database, the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Credit Alert System or Credit Alert Interactive Voice Response System, and the Depart- ment of Health and Human Services’ Office of Inspector General’s List of Excluded Individuals/Entities. This network of databases, and additional databases so des- ignated by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in consultation with agencies, shall be collectively known as the ‘‘Do Not Pay List.’’ This memorandum requires agencies to review these data- bases with the recognition that there may be cir- cumstances when the law nevertheless requires a pay- ment or award to be made to a recipient listed in them. My Administration began coordination of the databases discussed in this memorandum in April 2010 by launch- ing the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity In- formation System (FAPIIS), which integrates various sources of information on the eligibility of Government contractors for award. No later than 120 days of the date of this memorandum, the Director of the OMB shall provide to the President a plan for completing in- tegration for the remaining databases, to the extent permitted by law, so that agencies can access them through a single entry point. Each agency shall, within 90 days of the date of this memorandum, submit to the OMB a plan that includes information on its current pre-payment and pre-award procedures and a list of databases that the agency checks pursuant to those procedures. Within 180 days of the date of this memorandum, the Director of the OMB shall issue guidance, to be developed in consultation with affected agencies and taking into account current agency pre-payment and pre-award practices, on ac- tions agencies must take to carry out this memoran- dum’s requirements. This guidance shall clarify that the head of each agency is responsible for ensuring an efficient and accurate process for determining whether the information provided on the ‘‘Do Not Pay List’’ is sufficient to stop a payment, consistent with applicable laws and regulations, and, if so, whether a payment should be stopped under the circumstances. In addition, this guidance shall identify best practices and data- bases that agencies should utilize to conduct pre-pay- ment checks to ensure that only eligible recipients re- ceive Government benefits or payments. This memorandum is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or enti- ties, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person. The Director of the OMB is hereby authorized and di- rected to publish this memorandum in the Federal Reg- ister. BARACK OBAMA. § 3352. Estimates of improper payments and re- ports on actions to reduce improper pay- ments (a) IDENTIFICATION OF SUSCEPTIBLE PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES.— (1) IN GENERAL.—The head of each executive agency shall, in accordance with guidance pre- scribed by the Director of the Office of Man- agement and Budget— (A) periodically review all programs and activities that the head of the executive agency administers; and (B) identify all programs and activities with outlays exceeding the statutory thresh- old dollar amount described in paragraph (3)(A)(i) that may be susceptible to signifi- cant improper payments. (2) FREQUENCY.—A review under paragraph (1) shall be performed for each program and activity that the head of an executive agency administers not less frequently than once every 3 fiscal years. (3) RISK ASSESSMENTS.— (A) DEFINITION OF SIGNIFICANT.—In this paragraph, the term ‘‘significant’’ means that, in the preceding fiscal year, the sum of a program or activity’s improper payments and payments whose propriety cannot be de- termined by the executive agency due to lacking or insufficient documentation may have exceeded— (i) $10,000,000 of all reported program or activity payments of the executive agency made during that fiscal year and 1.5 per- cent of program outlays; or (ii) $100,000,000. (B) SCOPE.—In conducting a review under paragraph (1), the head of each executive agency shall take into account those risk factors that are likely to contribute to a susceptibility to significant improper pay- ments, such as— (i) whether the program or activity re- viewed is new to the executive agency; (ii) the complexity of the program or ac- tivity reviewed; (iii) the volume of payments made through the program or activity reviewed; (iv) whether payments or payment eligi- bility decisions are made outside of the ex- ecutive agency, such as by a State or local government; (v) recent major changes in program funding, authorities, practices, or proce- dures; (vi) the level, experience, and quality of training for personnel responsible for mak- ing program eligibility determinations or certifying that payments are accurate; (vii) significant deficiencies in the audit report of the executive agency or other relevant management findings that might hinder accurate payment certification; (viii) similarities to other programs or activities that have reported improper payment estimates or been deemed suscep- tible to significant improper payments; (ix) the accuracy and reliability of im- proper payment estimates previously re- ported for the program or activity, or other indicator of potential susceptibility to improper payments identified by the In- spector General of the executive agency, the Government Accountability Office, other audits performed by or on behalf of the Federal, State, or local government, disclosures by the executive agency, or any other means; (x) whether the program or activity lacks information or data systems to con- firm eligibility or provide for other pay- ment integrity needs; and Page 259 TITLE 31—MONEY AND FINANCE § 3352 (xi) the risk of fraud as assessed by the executive agency under the Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Govern- ment published by the Government Ac- countability Office (commonly known as the ‘‘Green Book’’). (C) ANNUAL REPORT.—Each executive agen- cy shall publish an annual report that in- cludes— (i) a listing of each program or activity identified under paragraph (1), including the date on which the program or activity was most recently assessed for risk under paragraph (1); and (ii) a listing of any program or activity for which the executive agency makes any substantial changes to the methodologies of the reviews conducted under paragraph (1). (b) IMPROVING THE DETERMINATION OF IM- PROPER PAYMENTS.— (1) IN GENERAL.—The Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall on an annual basis— (A) identify a list of high-priority Federal programs for greater levels of oversight and review— (i) in which the highest dollar value or highest rate of improper payments occur; or (ii) for which there is a higher risk of im- proper payments; and (B) in coordination with the executive agency responsible for administering a high- priority program identified under subpara- graph (A), establish annual targets and semi- annual or quarterly actions for reducing im- proper payments associated with the high- priority program. (2) REPORT ON HIGH-PRIORITY IMPROPER PAY- MENTS.— (A) IN GENERAL.—Subject to Federal pri- vacy policies and to the extent permitted by law, each executive agency with a program identified under paragraph (1)(A) shall on an annual basis submit to the Inspector General of the executive agency and the Office of Management and Budget, and make avail- able to the public, including through a website, a report on that program. (B) CONTENTS.—Each report submitted under subparagraph (A)— (i) shall describe any action the execu- tive agency— (I) has taken or plans to take to re- cover improper payments; and (II) intends to take to prevent future improper payments; and (ii) shall not include— (I) any referrals the executive agency made or anticipates making to the De- partment of Justice; or (II) any information provided in con- nection with a referral described in sub- clause (I). (C) PUBLIC AVAILABILITY ON CENTRAL WEBSITE.—The Office of Management and Budget shall make each report submitted under subparagraph (A) available on a cen- tral website. (D) AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION TO IN- SPECTOR GENERAL.—Subparagraph (B)(ii) shall not prohibit any referral or informa- tion being made available to an Inspector General as otherwise provided by law. (E) ASSESSMENT AND RECOMMENDATIONS.— The Inspector General of each executive agency that submits a report under subpara- graph (A) shall, for each program of the ex- ecutive agency that is identified under para- graph (1)(A)— (i) review— (I) the assessment of the level of risk associated with the program and the quality of the improper payment esti- mates and methodology of the executive agency relating to the program; and (II) the oversight or financial controls to identify and prevent improper pay- ments under the program; and (ii) submit to the appropriate author- izing and appropriations committees of Congress recommendations, which may be included in another report submitted by the Inspector General to Congress, for modifying any plans of the executive agen- cy relating to the program, including im- provements for improper payments deter- mination and estimation methodology. (F) ANNUAL MEETING.—Not less frequently than once every year, the head of each exec- utive agency with a program identified under paragraph (1)(A), or a designee of the head of the executive agency, shall meet with the Director of the Office of Manage- ment and Budget, or a designee of the Direc- tor, to report on actions taken during the preceding year and planned actions to pre- vent improper payments. (c) ESTIMATION OF IMPROPER PAYMENTS.— (1) ESTIMATION.—With respect to each pro- gram and activity identified under subsection (a)(1), the head of the relevant executive agen- cy shall— (A) produce a statistically valid estimate, or an estimate that is otherwise appropriate using a methodology approved by the Direc- tor of the Office of Management and Budget, of the improper payments made under the program or activity; and (B) include the estimates described in sub- paragraph (A) in the accompanying mate- rials to the annual financial statement of the executive agency and as required in ap- plicable guidance of the Office of Manage- ment and Budget. (2) LACKING OR INSUFFICIENT DOCUMENTA- TION.— (A) IN GENERAL.—For the purpose of pro- ducing an estimate under paragraph (1), when the executive agency cannot deter- mine, due to lacking or insufficient docu- mentation, whether a payment is proper or not, the payment shall be treated as an im- proper payment. (B) SEPARATE REPORT.—The head of an ex- ecutive agency may report separately on Page 260 TITLE 31—MONEY AND FINANCE § 3352 what portion of the improper payments esti- mate for a program or activity of the execu- tive agency under paragraph (1) is attrib- utable to lacking or insufficient documenta- tion. (d) REPORTS ON ACTIONS TO REDUCE IMPROPER PAYMENTS.—With respect to any program or ac- tivity of an executive agency with estimated im- proper payments under subsection (c), the head of the executive agency shall provide with the estimate required under subsection (c) a report on what actions the executive agency is taking to reduce improper payments, including— (1) a description of the causes of the im- proper payments, actions planned or taken to correct those causes, and the planned or ac- tual completion date of the actions taken to address those causes; (2) in order to reduce improper payments to a level below which further expenditures to re- duce improper payments would cost more than the amount those expenditures would save in prevented or recovered improper payments, a statement of whether the executive agency has what is needed with respect to— (A) internal controls; (B) human capital; and (C) information systems and other infra- structure; (3) if the executive agency does not have suf- ficient resources to establish and maintain ef- fective internal controls as described in para- graph (2)(A), a description of the resources the executive agency has requested in the budget submission of the executive agency to estab- lish and maintain those internal controls; (4) program-specific and activity-specific im- proper payments reduction targets that have been approved by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget; (5) a description of the steps the executive agency has taken to ensure that executive agency managers, programs, and, where appro- priate, States and local governments are held accountable through annual performance ap- praisal criteria for— (A) meeting applicable improper payments reduction targets; and (B) establishing and maintaining sufficient internal controls, including an appropriate control environment, that effectively— (i) prevent improper payments from being made; and (ii) promptly detect and recover im- proper payments that are made; and (6) a description of how the level of planned or completed actions by the executive agency to address the causes of the improper pay- ments matches the level of improper pay- ments, including a breakdown by category of improper payment and specific timelines for completion of those actions. (e) REPORTS ON ACTIONS TO RECOVER IMPROPER PAYMENTS.—With respect to improper payments identified in a recovery audit, the head of the executive agency shall provide with the esti- mate required under subsection (c) a report on all actions the executive agency is taking to re- cover the improper payments, including— (1) a discussion of the methods used by the executive agency to recover improper pay- ments; (2) the amounts recovered, outstanding, and determined to not be collectable, including the percent those amounts represent of the total improper payments of the executive agency; (3) if a determination has been made that certain improper payments are not collect- able, a justification of that determination; (4) an aging schedule of the amounts out- standing; (5) a summary of how recovered amounts have been disposed of; (6) a discussion of any conditions giving rise to improper payments and how those condi- tions are being resolved; and (7) if the executive agency has determined under subsection (i) that performing recovery audits for any applicable program or activity is not cost-effective, a justification for that determination. (f) GOVERNMENTWIDE REPORTING OF IMPROPER PAYMENTS AND ACTIONS TO RECOVER IMPROPER PAYMENTS.— (1) REPORT.—Each fiscal year, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall submit a report with respect to the preceding fiscal year on actions that executive agencies have taken to report information regarding improper payments and actions to recover im- proper payments to— (A) the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate; (B) the Committee on Oversight and Re- form of the House of Representatives; and (C) the Comptroller General of the United States. (2) CONTENTS.—Each report required under paragraph (1) shall include— (A) a summary of the reports of each exec- utive agency on improper payments and re- covery actions submitted under this section; (B) an identification of the compliance sta- tus of each executive agency, as determined by the Inspector General of the executive agency under section 3353, to which this sec- tion applies; (C) Governmentwide improper payment re- duction targets; (D) a Governmentwide estimate of im- proper payments; and (E) a discussion of progress made towards meeting Governmentwide improper payment reduction targets. (g) GUIDANCE BY THE OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this section, the Di- rector of the Office of Management and Budget shall prescribe guidance for executive agencies to implement the requirements of this section, which shall not include any exemptions to those requirements that are not specifically authorized by this section. (2) CONTENTS.—The guidance under para- graph (1) shall prescribe— (A) the form of the reports on actions to reduce improper payments, recovery actions, and Governmentwide reporting; and Page 261 TITLE 31—MONEY AND FINANCE § 3352 (B) strategies for addressing risks and es- tablishing appropriate prepayment and postpayment internal controls. (h) DETERMINATIONS OF AGENCY READINESS FOR OPINION ON INTERNAL CONTROL.—The criteria re- quired to be developed under section 2(g) of the Improper Payments Elimination and Recovery Act of 2010, as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this section— (1) shall continue to be in effect on and after the date of enactment of this section; and (2) may be modified as determined appro- priate by the Director of the Office of Manage- ment and Budget. (i) RECOVERY AUDITS.— (1) IN GENERAL.— (A) CONDUCT OF AUDITS.—Except as pro- vided under paragraph (3) and if not prohib- ited under any other provision of law, the head of each executive agency shall conduct recovery audits with respect to each pro- gram and activity of the executive agency that expends $1,000,000 or more annually if conducting the audits would be cost effec- tive. (B) PROCEDURES.—In conducting a recov- ery audit under this subsection, the head of an executive agency— (i) shall give priority to the most recent payments and to payments made in any program identified as susceptible to sig- nificant improper payments under sub- section (a); (ii) shall implement this subsection in a manner designed to ensure the greatest fi- nancial benefit to the Federal Govern- ment; and (iii) may conduct the recovery audit di- rectly, by using other departments and agencies of the United States, or by pro- curing performance of recovery audits by private sector sources by contract, subject to the availability of appropriations, or by any combination thereof. (C) RECOVERY AUDIT CONTRACTS.—With re- spect to a recovery audit procured by an ex- ecutive agency by contract— (i) subject to subparagraph (B)(iii), and except to the extent such actions are out- side the authority of the executive agency under section 7103 of title 41, the head of the executive agency may authorize the contractor to— (I) notify entities, including individ- uals, of potential overpayments made to those entities; (II) respond to questions concerning potential overpayments; and (III) take other administrative actions with respect to an overpayment claim made or to be made by the executive agency; and (ii) the contractor shall not have the au- thority to make a final determination re- lating to whether any overpayment oc- curred or whether to compromise, settle, or terminate an overpayment claim. (D) CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS.— (i) IN GENERAL.—The executive agency shall include in each contract for procure- ment of performance of a recovery audit a requirement that the contractor shall— (I) provide to the executive agency periodic reports on conditions giving rise to overpayments identified by the con- tractor and any recommendations on how to mitigate those conditions; (II) notify the executive agency of any overpayments identified by the con- tractor pertaining to the executive agen- cy or to any other executive agency that are beyond the scope of the contract; and (III) report to the executive agency credible evidence of fraud or vulnerabilities to fraud and conduct ap- propriate training of personnel of the contractor on identification of fraud. (ii) REPORTS ON ACTIONS TAKEN.—Each executive agency shall, on an annual basis, include in annual financial statement of the executive agency a report on actions taken by the executive agency during the preceding fiscal year to address the rec- ommendations described in clause (i)(I). (E) AGENCY ACTION FOLLOWING NOTIFICA- TION.—Each executive agency shall— (i) take prompt and appropriate action in response to a report or notification by a contractor under subclause (I) or (II) of subparagraph (D)(i) to collect an overpay- ment; and (ii) forward to other executive agencies any information that applies to that exec- utive agency. (2) DISPOSITION OF AMOUNTS RECOVERED.— (A) IN GENERAL.—Amounts collected by ex- ecutive agencies each fiscal year through re- covery audits shall be treated in accordance with this paragraph. (B) DISTRIBUTION.—The head of an execu- tive agency shall determine the distribution of collected amounts described in subpara- graph (A), less amounts needed to fulfill the purposes of section 3562(a) of this title, in ac- cordance with subparagraphs (C), (D), and (E). (C) USE FOR FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT IM- PROVEMENT PROGRAM.—Not more than 25 per- cent of the amounts collected by an execu- tive agency through recovery audits— (i) shall be available to the head of the executive agency to carry out the finan- cial management improvement program of the executive agency under paragraph (3); (ii) may be credited, if applicable, for the purpose described in clause (i) by the head of an executive agency to any executive agency appropriations and funds that are available for obligation at the time of col- lection; and (iii) shall be used to supplement and not supplant any other amounts available for the purpose described in clause (i) and shall remain available until expended. (D) USE FOR ORIGINAL PURPOSE.—Not more than 25 percent of the amounts collected by an executive agency through recovery au- dits— (i) shall be credited to the appropriation or fund, if any, available for obligation at Page 262 TITLE 31—MONEY AND FINANCE § 3352 the time of collection for the same general purposes as the appropriation or fund from which the overpayment was made; (ii) shall remain available for the same period and purposes as the appropriation or fund to which credited; and (iii) if the appropriation from which an overpayment was made has expired— (I) in the case of recoveries of overpay- ments that are made from a trust or spe- cial fund account, shall revert to that account; and (II) in the case of other recoveries of overpayments— (aa) for amounts that are recovered more than 5 fiscal years from the last fiscal year in which the funds were available for obligation, shall be depos- ited in the Treasury as miscellaneous receipts; and (bb) for other amounts, shall be newly available for the same time pe- riod as the funds were originally avail- able for obligation. (E) USE FOR INSPECTOR GENERAL ACTIVI- TIES.—Not more than 5 percent of the amounts collected by an executive agency through recovery audits— (i) shall be available to the Inspector General of that executive agency for— (I) the Inspector General to carry out this Act; or (II) any other activities of the Inspec- tor General relating to investigating im- proper payments or auditing internal controls associated with payments; and (ii) shall remain available for the same period and purposes as the appropriation or fund to which credited. (F) REMAINDER.—Amounts collected that are not applied in accordance with subpara- graph (B), (C), (D), or (E) shall be deposited in the Treasury as miscellaneous receipts, except that in the case of recoveries of over- payments that are made from trust or spe- cial fund accounts, those amounts shall re- vert to those accounts. (G) DISCRETIONARY AMOUNTS.—This para- graph shall apply only to recoveries of over- payments that are made from discretionary appropriations, as defined in section 250(c)(7) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Def- icit Control Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 900(c)(7)), and shall not apply to recoveries of overpay- ments that are made from discretionary amounts that were appropriated before the date of enactment of the Improper Payments Elimination and Recovery Act of 2010, as in effect on the day before the date of enact- ment of this section. (H) APPLICATION.—This paragraph shall not apply to the recovery of an overpayment if the appropriation from which the overpay- ment was made has not expired. (3) FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM.— (A) REQUIREMENT.—The head of each exec- utive agency shall conduct a financial man- agement improvement program consistent with rules prescribed by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget. (B) PROGRAM FEATURES.—In conducting a program described in subparagraph (A), the head of an executive agency— (i) shall, as the first priority of the pro- gram, address problems that contribute di- rectly to executive agency improper pay- ments; and (ii) may seek to reduce errors and waste in other executive agency programs and operations. (4) PRIVACY PROTECTIONS.—Any nongovern- mental entity that, in the course of recovery auditing or recovery activity under this sub- section, obtains information that identifies an individual or with respect to which there is a reasonable basis to believe that the informa- tion can be used to identify an individual, may not disclose the information for any purpose other than the recovery auditing or recovery activity and governmental oversight of the ac- tivity, unless disclosure for that other purpose is authorized by the individual to the execu- tive agency that contracted for the perform- ance of the recovery auditing or recovery ac- tivity. (5) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Except as pro- vided under paragraph (4), nothing in this sub- section shall be construed as terminating or in any way limiting authorities that are other- wise available to executive agencies under ex- isting provisions of law to recover improper payments and use recovered amounts. (Added Pub. L. 116–117, § 2(a), Mar. 2, 2020, 134 Stat. 114.) Editorial Notes REFERENCES IN TEXT The date of enactment of this section, referred to in subsecs. (g)(1), (h), and (i)(2)(G), is the date of enact- ment of Pub. L. 116–117, which was approved Mar. 2, 2020. Section 2(g) of the Improper Payments Elimination and Recovery Act of 2010, referred to in subsec. (h), is section 2(g) of Pub. L. 111–204, July 22, 2010, 124 Stat. 2228, which was formerly set out as a note under section 3321 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 116–117, § 3(a)(2), Mar. 2, 2020, 134 Stat. 133. This Act, referred to in subsec. (i)(2)(E)(i)(I), probably means Pub. L. 116–117, which enacted this subchapter, amended section 3562 of this title, section 612 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and section 1397ee of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, amended provisions set out as a note under 5701 of Title 5, Government Organiza- tion and Employees, and repealed provisions set out as notes under sections 3301 and 3321 of this title. For com- plete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 2020 Amendment note set out under section 3301 of this title and Tables. The date of enactment of the Improper Payments Elimination and Recovery Act of 2010, referred to sub- sec. (i)(2)(G), is the date of enactment of Pub. L. 111–204, which was approved July 22, 2010. Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries CHANGE OF NAME Committee on Oversight and Reform of House of Rep- resentatives changed to Committee on Oversight and Accountability of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 5, One Hundred Eighteenth Congress, Jan. 9, 2023. Page 263 TITLE 31—MONEY AND FINANCE § 3353 § 3353. Compliance (a) ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT BY INSPECTORS GENERAL OF EXECUTIVE AGENCIES.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Each fiscal year, the In- spector General of each executive agency shall— (A) determine whether the executive agen- cy is in compliance; and (B) submit a report on the determination made under subparagraph (A) to— (i) the head of the executive agency; (ii) the Committee on Homeland Secu- rity and Governmental Affairs of the Sen- ate; (iii) the Committee on Oversight and Re- form of the House of Representatives; and (iv) the Comptroller General of the United States. (2) DEVELOPMENT OR USE OF A CENTRAL WEBSITE.—The Council of the Inspectors Gen- eral on Integrity and Efficiency (in this sub- section referred to as the ‘‘Council’’) shall de- velop a public central website, or make use of a public central website in existence on the date of enactment of this section, to contain individual compliance determination reports issued by Inspectors General under paragraph (1)(B) and such additional information as de- termined by the Council. (3) OMB GUIDANCE.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this section, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, in consultation with the Council and with consideration given to the available re- sources and independence of individual Offices of Inspectors General, shall develop and pro- mulgate guidance for the compliance deter- mination reports issued by the Inspectors Gen- eral under paragraph (1)(B), which shall re- quire that— (A) the reporting format used by the In- spectors General is consistent; (B) Inspectors General evaluate and take into account the adequacy of executive agency risk assessments, improper payment estimates methodology, and executive agen- cy action plans to address the causes of im- proper payments; (C) Inspectors General take into account whether the executive agency has correctly identified the causes of improper payments and whether the actions of the executive agency to address those causes are adequate and effective; (D) Inspectors General evaluate the ade- quacy of executive agency action plans on how the executive agency addresses the causes of improper payments; and (E) as part of the report, Inspectors Gen- eral include an evaluation of executive agen- cy efforts to prevent and reduce improper payments and any recommendations for ac- tions to further improve that prevention and reduction. (4) CIGIE GUIDANCE.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this section, the Council shall, with consideration given to the available resources and independence of indi- vidual Offices of Inspectors General, develop and promulgate guidance that specifies proce- dures for compliance determinations made by the Inspectors General under paragraph (1)(A), which shall describe procedures for Inspectors General— (A) to make the determinations consistent regarding compliance; and (B) to evaluate— (i) for compliance with the requirement described in section 3351(2)(B), the risk as- sessment methodology of the executive agency, including whether the audits, ex- aminations, and legal actions of the In- spector General indicate a higher risk of improper payments or actual improper payments that were not included in the risk assessments of the executive agency conducted under section 3352(a); (ii) for compliance with the requirement described in section 3351(2)(C), the accu- racy of the rate estimates and whether the sampling and estimation plan used is ap- propriate given program characteristics; (iii) for compliance with the requirement described in section 3351(2)(D), the correc- tive action plans and whether the plans are adequate and focused on the true causes of improper payments, including whether the corrective action plans are— (I) reducing improper payments; (II) effectively implemented; and (III) prioritized within the executive agency; (iv) the adequacy of executive agency ac- tion plans to address the causes of im- proper payments; (v) executive agency efforts to prevent and reduce improper payments, and any recommendations for actions to further improve; and (vi) whether an executive agency has published an annual financial statement in accordance with the requirement described in section 3351(2)(A). (b) REMEDIATION.— (1) NONCOMPLIANCE.— (A) IN GENERAL.—If an executive agency is determined by the Inspector General of that executive agency not to be in compliance under subsection (a) in a fiscal year with re- spect to a program or activity, the head of the executive agency shall submit to the ap- propriate authorizing and appropriations committees of Congress a plan describing the actions that the executive agency will take to come into compliance. (B) PLAN.—The plan described in subpara- graph (A) shall include— (i) measurable milestones to be accom- plished in order to achieve compliance for each program or activity; (ii) the designation of a senior executive agency official who shall be accountable for the progress of the executive agency in coming into compliance for each program or activity; and (iii) the establishment of an account- ability mechanism, such as a performance agreement, with appropriate incentives and consequences tied to the success of the official designated under clause (ii) in

Cross-references

Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

2 U.S.C. § 900 — Statement of budget enforcement through sequestration; definitions

**(a) Omitted** **(b) General statement of budget enforcement through sequestration** This subchapter provides for budget enforcement as called for in House Concurrent Resolution 84 (105th Congress, 1st session). **(c) Definitions** As used in this subchapter: (1) The terms “budget authority”, “new budget authority”, “outlays”, and “deficit” have the meanings given to such terms in section 3 of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 [[2 U.S.C. 622](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title2-section622&num=0&edition=prelim)] and “discretionary spending limit” shall mean the amounts specified in [section 901 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title2-section901&num=0&edition=prelim). (2) The terms “sequester” and “sequestration” refer to or mean the cancellation of budgetary resources provided by discretionary appropriations or direct spending law. (3) The term “breach” means, for any fiscal year, the amount (if any) by which new budget authority or outlays for that year (within a category of discretionary appropriations) is above that category’s discretionary spending limit for new budget authority or outlays for that year, as the case may be. (4) (A) The term “nonsecurity category” means all discretionary appropriations not included in the security category defined in subparagraph (B). (B) The term “security category” includes discretionary appropriations associated with agency budgets for the Department of Defense, the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Veterans Affairs, the National Nuclear Security Administration, the intelligence community management account (95–0401–0–1–054), and all budget accounts in budget function 150 (international affairs). (C

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 2 U.S.C. § 900

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 2 U.S.C. § 900. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

2 U.S.C. § 900 — Statement of budget enforcement through

Page 232 TITLE 2—THE CONGRESS § 900 (2) Qualification An individual, organization, institution, or business may qualify for an award under this section only if such individual, organization, institution, or business— (A) is nominated to the Majority or Minor- ity Leader of the Senate or to the Speaker or the Minority Leader of the House of Rep- resentatives by a member of the Senate or the House of Representatives; (B) permits a rigorous evaluation by the Office of Technology Assessment of the way in which such individual, organization, insti- tution, or business has demonstrated excel- lence in promoting United States industrial competitiveness; and (C) meets such other requirements as the selection panel determines to be appropriate to achieve the objectives of this section. (3) Evaluation An evaluation of each nominee shall be con- ducted by the Office of Technology Assess- ment. The Office of Technology Assessment shall work with the selection panel to estab- lish appropriate procedures for evaluating nominees. (4) Panel review The selection panel shall review the Office of Technology Assessment’s evaluation of each nominee and may, based on those evaluations, recommend 1 award winner for each year for each category described in subsection (b)(1) to the Majority and Minority Leaders of the Sen- ate and the Speaker and the Minority Leader of the House of Representatives. (d) Presentation of award (1) In general The Majority and Minority Leaders of the Senate and the Speaker and the Minority Leader of the House of Representatives shall make the award to an individual and an orga- nization, institution, or business that has demonstrated excellence in promoting United States industrial competitiveness in the inter- national marketplace t

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 2 U.S.C. § 900

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 2 U.S.C. § 900. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

31 U.S.C. § 3352 — Estimates of improper payments and reports on actions to reduce improper payments

**(a) Identification of Susceptible Programs and Activities.—** (1) **In general.—** — The head of each executive agency shall, in accordance with guidance prescribed by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget— (A) periodically review all programs and activities that the head of the executive agency administers; and (B) identify all programs and activities with outlays exceeding the statutory threshold dollar amount described in paragraph (3)(A)(i) that may be susceptible to significant improper payments. (2) **Frequency.—** — A review under paragraph (1) shall be performed for each program and activity that the head of an executive agency administers not less frequently than once every 3 fiscal years. (3) **Risk assessments.—** (A) *Definition of significant.—* — In this paragraph, the term “significant” means that, in the preceding fiscal year, the sum of a program or activity’s improper payments and payments whose propriety cannot be determined by the executive agency due to lacking or insufficient documentation may have exceeded— (i) $10,000,000 of all reported program or activity payments of the executive agency made during that fiscal year and 1.5 percent of program outlays; or (ii) $100,000,000. (B) *Scope.—* — In conducting a review under paragraph (1), the head of each executive agency shall take into account those risk factors that are likely to contribute to a susceptibility to significant improper payments, such as— (i) whether the program or activity reviewed is new to the executive agency; (ii) the complexity of the program or activity reviewed; (iii) the volume of payments made through the program or activity reviewed; (iv) whether payments or payment eligibility decisions are made outside of the ex

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 31 U.S.C. § 3352

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.