Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
31 U.S.C. § 3352 — Estimates of improper payments and re-
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 258
TITLE 31—MONEY AND FINANCE
§ 3352
Therefore, I hereby direct agencies to review current
pre-payment and pre-award procedures and ensure that
a thorough review of available databases with relevant
information on eligibility occurs before the release of
any Federal funds, to the extent permitted by law. At
a minimum, agencies shall, before payment and award,
check the following existing databases (where applica-
ble and permitted by law) to verify eligibility: the So-
cial Security Administration’s Death Master File, the
General Services Administration’s Excluded Parties
List System, the Department of the Treasury’s Debt
Check Database, the Department of Housing and Urban
Development’s Credit Alert System or Credit Alert
Interactive Voice Response System, and the Depart-
ment of Health and Human Services’ Office of Inspector
General’s List of Excluded Individuals/Entities. This
network of databases, and additional databases so des-
ignated by the Director of the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) in consultation with agencies, shall
be collectively known as the ‘‘Do Not Pay List.’’ This
memorandum requires agencies to review these data-
bases with the recognition that there may be cir-
cumstances when the law nevertheless requires a pay-
ment or award to be made to a recipient listed in them.
My Administration began coordination of the databases
discussed in this memorandum in April 2010 by launch-
ing the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity In-
formation System (FAPIIS), which integrates various
sources of information on the eligibility of Government
contractors for award. No later than 120 days of the
date of this memorandum, the Director of the OMB
shall provide to the President a plan for completing in-
tegration for the remaini
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 31 U.S.C. § 3352
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: b9cd463389feda947276a24a7e64afebdfc3c7b3b98822b0cee7205abf6626d8. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-b08151a6cbb7a23564fa6698
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-31/section-3352-estimates-of-improper-payments-and-re--4de1445776.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: eeec87fcab50789aae7cf4c1eb50b0d72bb9610607ae53a2a8699424276ca61a
Source location: USCODE-2024-title31-subtitleIII-chap33-subchapIV-sec3352.pdf
Stored source content
Page 258
TITLE 31—MONEY AND FINANCE
§ 3352
Therefore, I hereby direct agencies to review current
pre-payment and pre-award procedures and ensure that
a thorough review of available databases with relevant
information on eligibility occurs before the release of
any Federal funds, to the extent permitted by law. At
a minimum, agencies shall, before payment and award,
check the following existing databases (where applica-
ble and permitted by law) to verify eligibility: the So-
cial Security Administration’s Death Master File, the
General Services Administration’s Excluded Parties
List System, the Department of the Treasury’s Debt
Check Database, the Department of Housing and Urban
Development’s Credit Alert System or Credit Alert
Interactive Voice Response System, and the Depart-
ment of Health and Human Services’ Office of Inspector
General’s List of Excluded Individuals/Entities. This
network of databases, and additional databases so des-
ignated by the Director of the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) in consultation with agencies, shall
be collectively known as the ‘‘Do Not Pay List.’’ This
memorandum requires agencies to review these data-
bases with the recognition that there may be cir-
cumstances when the law nevertheless requires a pay-
ment or award to be made to a recipient listed in them.
My Administration began coordination of the databases
discussed in this memorandum in April 2010 by launch-
ing the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity In-
formation System (FAPIIS), which integrates various
sources of information on the eligibility of Government
contractors for award. No later than 120 days of the
date of this memorandum, the Director of the OMB
shall provide to the President a plan for completing in-
tegration for the remaining databases, to the extent
permitted by law, so that agencies can access them
through a single entry point.
Each agency shall, within 90 days of the date of this
memorandum, submit to the OMB a plan that includes
information on its current pre-payment and pre-award
procedures and a list of databases that the agency
checks pursuant to those procedures. Within 180 days of
the date of this memorandum, the Director of the OMB
shall issue guidance, to be developed in consultation
with affected agencies and taking into account current
agency pre-payment and pre-award practices, on ac-
tions agencies must take to carry out this memoran-
dum’s requirements. This guidance shall clarify that
the head of each agency is responsible for ensuring an
efficient and accurate process for determining whether
the information provided on the ‘‘Do Not Pay List’’ is
sufficient to stop a payment, consistent with applicable
laws and regulations, and, if so, whether a payment
should be stopped under the circumstances. In addition,
this guidance shall identify best practices and data-
bases that agencies should utilize to conduct pre-pay-
ment checks to ensure that only eligible recipients re-
ceive Government benefits or payments.
This memorandum is not intended to, and does not,
create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural,
enforceable at law or in equity by any party against
the United States, its departments, agencies, or enti-
ties, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other
person.
The Director of the OMB is hereby authorized and di-
rected to publish this memorandum in the Federal Reg-
ister.
BARACK OBAMA.
§ 3352. Estimates of improper payments and re-
ports on actions to reduce improper pay-
ments
(a) IDENTIFICATION OF SUSCEPTIBLE PROGRAMS
AND ACTIVITIES.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The head of each executive
agency shall, in accordance with guidance pre-
scribed by the Director of the Office of Man-
agement and Budget—
(A) periodically review all programs and
activities that the head of the executive
agency administers; and
(B) identify all programs and activities
with outlays exceeding the statutory thresh-
old dollar amount described in paragraph
(3)(A)(i) that may be susceptible to signifi-
cant improper payments.
(2) FREQUENCY.—A review under paragraph
(1) shall be performed for each program and
activity that the head of an executive agency
administers not less frequently than once
every 3 fiscal years.
(3) RISK ASSESSMENTS.—
(A) DEFINITION
OF
SIGNIFICANT.—In this
paragraph, the term ‘‘significant’’ means
that, in the preceding fiscal year, the sum of
a program or activity’s improper payments
and payments whose propriety cannot be de-
termined by the executive agency due to
lacking or insufficient documentation may
have exceeded—
(i) $10,000,000 of all reported program or
activity payments of the executive agency
made during that fiscal year and 1.5 per-
cent of program outlays; or
(ii) $100,000,000.
(B) SCOPE.—In conducting a review under
paragraph (1), the head of each executive
agency shall take into account those risk
factors that are likely to contribute to a
susceptibility to significant improper pay-
ments, such as—
(i) whether the program or activity re-
viewed is new to the executive agency;
(ii) the complexity of the program or ac-
tivity reviewed;
(iii) the volume of payments made
through the program or activity reviewed;
(iv) whether payments or payment eligi-
bility decisions are made outside of the ex-
ecutive agency, such as by a State or local
government;
(v) recent major changes in program
funding, authorities, practices, or proce-
dures;
(vi) the level, experience, and quality of
training for personnel responsible for mak-
ing program eligibility determinations or
certifying that payments are accurate;
(vii) significant deficiencies in the audit
report of the executive agency or other
relevant management findings that might
hinder accurate payment certification;
(viii) similarities to other programs or
activities that have reported improper
payment estimates or been deemed suscep-
tible to significant improper payments;
(ix) the accuracy and reliability of im-
proper payment estimates previously re-
ported for the program or activity, or
other indicator of potential susceptibility
to improper payments identified by the In-
spector General of the executive agency,
the Government Accountability Office,
other audits performed by or on behalf of
the Federal, State, or local government,
disclosures by the executive agency, or
any other means;
(x) whether the program or activity
lacks information or data systems to con-
firm eligibility or provide for other pay-
ment integrity needs; and
Page 259
TITLE 31—MONEY AND FINANCE
§ 3352
(xi) the risk of fraud as assessed by the
executive agency under the Standards for
Internal Control in the Federal Govern-
ment published by the Government Ac-
countability Office (commonly known as
the ‘‘Green Book’’).
(C) ANNUAL REPORT.—Each executive agen-
cy shall publish an annual report that in-
cludes—
(i) a listing of each program or activity
identified under paragraph (1), including
the date on which the program or activity
was most recently assessed for risk under
paragraph (1); and
(ii) a listing of any program or activity
for which the executive agency makes any
substantial changes to the methodologies
of the reviews conducted under paragraph
(1).
(b) IMPROVING
THE
DETERMINATION
OF
IM-
PROPER PAYMENTS.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Director of the Office
of Management and Budget shall on an annual
basis—
(A) identify a list of high-priority Federal
programs for greater levels of oversight and
review—
(i) in which the highest dollar value or
highest rate of improper payments occur;
or
(ii) for which there is a higher risk of im-
proper payments; and
(B) in coordination with the executive
agency responsible for administering a high-
priority program identified under subpara-
graph (A), establish annual targets and semi-
annual or quarterly actions for reducing im-
proper payments associated with the high-
priority program.
(2) REPORT ON HIGH-PRIORITY IMPROPER PAY-
MENTS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Subject to Federal pri-
vacy policies and to the extent permitted by
law, each executive agency with a program
identified under paragraph (1)(A) shall on an
annual basis submit to the Inspector General
of the executive agency and the Office of
Management and Budget, and make avail-
able to the public, including through a
website, a report on that program.
(B)
CONTENTS.—Each
report
submitted
under subparagraph (A)—
(i) shall describe any action the execu-
tive agency—
(I) has taken or plans to take to re-
cover improper payments; and
(II) intends to take to prevent future
improper payments; and
(ii) shall not include—
(I) any referrals the executive agency
made or anticipates making to the De-
partment of Justice; or
(II) any information provided in con-
nection with a referral described in sub-
clause (I).
(C)
PUBLIC
AVAILABILITY
ON
CENTRAL
WEBSITE.—The Office of Management and
Budget shall make each report submitted
under subparagraph (A) available on a cen-
tral website.
(D) AVAILABILITY
OF
INFORMATION
TO
IN-
SPECTOR
GENERAL.—Subparagraph
(B)(ii)
shall not prohibit any referral or informa-
tion being made available to an Inspector
General as otherwise provided by law.
(E) ASSESSMENT AND RECOMMENDATIONS.—
The Inspector General of each executive
agency that submits a report under subpara-
graph (A) shall, for each program of the ex-
ecutive agency that is identified under para-
graph (1)(A)—
(i) review—
(I) the assessment of the level of risk
associated with the program and the
quality of the improper payment esti-
mates and methodology of the executive
agency relating to the program; and
(II) the oversight or financial controls
to identify and prevent improper pay-
ments under the program; and
(ii) submit to the appropriate author-
izing and appropriations committees of
Congress recommendations, which may be
included in another report submitted by
the Inspector General to Congress, for
modifying any plans of the executive agen-
cy relating to the program, including im-
provements for improper payments deter-
mination and estimation methodology.
(F) ANNUAL MEETING.—Not less frequently
than once every year, the head of each exec-
utive agency with a program identified
under paragraph (1)(A), or a designee of the
head of the executive agency, shall meet
with the Director of the Office of Manage-
ment and Budget, or a designee of the Direc-
tor, to report on actions taken during the
preceding year and planned actions to pre-
vent improper payments.
(c) ESTIMATION OF IMPROPER PAYMENTS.—
(1) ESTIMATION.—With respect to each pro-
gram and activity identified under subsection
(a)(1), the head of the relevant executive agen-
cy shall—
(A) produce a statistically valid estimate,
or an estimate that is otherwise appropriate
using a methodology approved by the Direc-
tor of the Office of Management and Budget,
of the improper payments made under the
program or activity; and
(B) include the estimates described in sub-
paragraph (A) in the accompanying mate-
rials to the annual financial statement of
the executive agency and as required in ap-
plicable guidance of the Office of Manage-
ment and Budget.
(2) LACKING
OR
INSUFFICIENT
DOCUMENTA-
TION.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—For the purpose of pro-
ducing an estimate under paragraph (1),
when the executive agency cannot deter-
mine, due to lacking or insufficient docu-
mentation, whether a payment is proper or
not, the payment shall be treated as an im-
proper payment.
(B) SEPARATE REPORT.—The head of an ex-
ecutive agency may report separately on
Page 260
TITLE 31—MONEY AND FINANCE
§ 3352
what portion of the improper payments esti-
mate for a program or activity of the execu-
tive agency under paragraph (1) is attrib-
utable to lacking or insufficient documenta-
tion.
(d) REPORTS ON ACTIONS TO REDUCE IMPROPER
PAYMENTS.—With respect to any program or ac-
tivity of an executive agency with estimated im-
proper payments under subsection (c), the head
of the executive agency shall provide with the
estimate required under subsection (c) a report
on what actions the executive agency is taking
to reduce improper payments, including—
(1) a description of the causes of the im-
proper payments, actions planned or taken to
correct those causes, and the planned or ac-
tual completion date of the actions taken to
address those causes;
(2) in order to reduce improper payments to
a level below which further expenditures to re-
duce improper payments would cost more than
the amount those expenditures would save in
prevented or recovered improper payments, a
statement of whether the executive agency
has what is needed with respect to—
(A) internal controls;
(B) human capital; and
(C) information systems and other infra-
structure;
(3) if the executive agency does not have suf-
ficient resources to establish and maintain ef-
fective internal controls as described in para-
graph (2)(A), a description of the resources the
executive agency has requested in the budget
submission of the executive agency to estab-
lish and maintain those internal controls;
(4) program-specific and activity-specific im-
proper payments reduction targets that have
been approved by the Director of the Office of
Management and Budget;
(5) a description of the steps the executive
agency has taken to ensure that executive
agency managers, programs, and, where appro-
priate, States and local governments are held
accountable through annual performance ap-
praisal criteria for—
(A) meeting applicable improper payments
reduction targets; and
(B) establishing and maintaining sufficient
internal controls, including an appropriate
control environment, that effectively—
(i) prevent improper payments from
being made; and
(ii) promptly detect and recover im-
proper payments that are made; and
(6) a description of how the level of planned
or completed actions by the executive agency
to address the causes of the improper pay-
ments matches the level of improper pay-
ments, including a breakdown by category of
improper payment and specific timelines for
completion of those actions.
(e) REPORTS ON ACTIONS TO RECOVER IMPROPER
PAYMENTS.—With respect to improper payments
identified in a recovery audit, the head of the
executive agency shall provide with the esti-
mate required under subsection (c) a report on
all actions the executive agency is taking to re-
cover the improper payments, including—
(1) a discussion of the methods used by the
executive agency to recover improper pay-
ments;
(2) the amounts recovered, outstanding, and
determined to not be collectable, including the
percent those amounts represent of the total
improper payments of the executive agency;
(3) if a determination has been made that
certain improper payments are not collect-
able, a justification of that determination;
(4) an aging schedule of the amounts out-
standing;
(5) a summary of how recovered amounts
have been disposed of;
(6) a discussion of any conditions giving rise
to improper payments and how those condi-
tions are being resolved; and
(7) if the executive agency has determined
under subsection (i) that performing recovery
audits for any applicable program or activity
is not cost-effective, a justification for that
determination.
(f) GOVERNMENTWIDE REPORTING OF IMPROPER
PAYMENTS AND ACTIONS TO RECOVER IMPROPER
PAYMENTS.—
(1) REPORT.—Each fiscal year, the Director
of the Office of Management and Budget shall
submit a report with respect to the preceding
fiscal year on actions that executive agencies
have taken to report information regarding
improper payments and actions to recover im-
proper payments to—
(A) the Committee on Homeland Security
and Governmental Affairs of the Senate;
(B) the Committee on Oversight and Re-
form of the House of Representatives; and
(C) the Comptroller General of the United
States.
(2) CONTENTS.—Each report required under
paragraph (1) shall include—
(A) a summary of the reports of each exec-
utive agency on improper payments and re-
covery actions submitted under this section;
(B) an identification of the compliance sta-
tus of each executive agency, as determined
by the Inspector General of the executive
agency under section 3353, to which this sec-
tion applies;
(C) Governmentwide improper payment re-
duction targets;
(D) a Governmentwide estimate of im-
proper payments; and
(E) a discussion of progress made towards
meeting Governmentwide improper payment
reduction targets.
(g) GUIDANCE BY THE OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT
AND BUDGET.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after
the date of enactment of this section, the Di-
rector of the Office of Management and Budget
shall prescribe guidance for executive agencies
to implement the requirements of this section,
which shall not include any exemptions to
those requirements that are not specifically
authorized by this section.
(2) CONTENTS.—The guidance under para-
graph (1) shall prescribe—
(A) the form of the reports on actions to
reduce improper payments, recovery actions,
and Governmentwide reporting; and
Page 261
TITLE 31—MONEY AND FINANCE
§ 3352
(B) strategies for addressing risks and es-
tablishing
appropriate
prepayment
and
postpayment internal controls.
(h) DETERMINATIONS OF AGENCY READINESS FOR
OPINION ON INTERNAL CONTROL.—The criteria re-
quired to be developed under section 2(g) of the
Improper Payments Elimination and Recovery
Act of 2010, as in effect on the day before the
date of enactment of this section—
(1) shall continue to be in effect on and after
the date of enactment of this section; and
(2) may be modified as determined appro-
priate by the Director of the Office of Manage-
ment and Budget.
(i) RECOVERY AUDITS.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—
(A) CONDUCT
OF
AUDITS.—Except as pro-
vided under paragraph (3) and if not prohib-
ited under any other provision of law, the
head of each executive agency shall conduct
recovery audits with respect to each pro-
gram and activity of the executive agency
that expends $1,000,000 or more annually if
conducting the audits would be cost effec-
tive.
(B) PROCEDURES.—In conducting a recov-
ery audit under this subsection, the head of
an executive agency—
(i) shall give priority to the most recent
payments and to payments made in any
program identified as susceptible to sig-
nificant improper payments under sub-
section (a);
(ii) shall implement this subsection in a
manner designed to ensure the greatest fi-
nancial benefit to the Federal Govern-
ment; and
(iii) may conduct the recovery audit di-
rectly, by using other departments and
agencies of the United States, or by pro-
curing performance of recovery audits by
private sector sources by contract, subject
to the availability of appropriations, or by
any combination thereof.
(C) RECOVERY AUDIT CONTRACTS.—With re-
spect to a recovery audit procured by an ex-
ecutive agency by contract—
(i) subject to subparagraph (B)(iii), and
except to the extent such actions are out-
side the authority of the executive agency
under section 7103 of title 41, the head of
the executive agency may authorize the
contractor to—
(I) notify entities, including individ-
uals, of potential overpayments made to
those entities;
(II) respond to questions concerning
potential overpayments; and
(III) take other administrative actions
with respect to an overpayment claim
made or to be made by the executive
agency; and
(ii) the contractor shall not have the au-
thority to make a final determination re-
lating to whether any overpayment oc-
curred or whether to compromise, settle,
or terminate an overpayment claim.
(D) CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—
(i) IN
GENERAL.—The executive agency
shall include in each contract for procure-
ment of performance of a recovery audit a
requirement that the contractor shall—
(I) provide to the executive agency
periodic reports on conditions giving rise
to overpayments identified by the con-
tractor and any recommendations on
how to mitigate those conditions;
(II) notify the executive agency of any
overpayments identified by the con-
tractor pertaining to the executive agen-
cy or to any other executive agency that
are beyond the scope of the contract; and
(III) report to the executive agency
credible
evidence
of
fraud
or
vulnerabilities to fraud and conduct ap-
propriate training of personnel of the
contractor on identification of fraud.
(ii) REPORTS
ON
ACTIONS
TAKEN.—Each
executive agency shall, on an annual basis,
include in annual financial statement of
the executive agency a report on actions
taken by the executive agency during the
preceding fiscal year to address the rec-
ommendations described in clause (i)(I).
(E) AGENCY
ACTION
FOLLOWING
NOTIFICA-
TION.—Each executive agency shall—
(i) take prompt and appropriate action
in response to a report or notification by a
contractor under subclause (I) or (II) of
subparagraph (D)(i) to collect an overpay-
ment; and
(ii) forward to other executive agencies
any information that applies to that exec-
utive agency.
(2) DISPOSITION OF AMOUNTS RECOVERED.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Amounts collected by ex-
ecutive agencies each fiscal year through re-
covery audits shall be treated in accordance
with this paragraph.
(B) DISTRIBUTION.—The head of an execu-
tive agency shall determine the distribution
of collected amounts described in subpara-
graph (A), less amounts needed to fulfill the
purposes of section 3562(a) of this title, in ac-
cordance with subparagraphs (C), (D), and
(E).
(C) USE
FOR
FINANCIAL
MANAGEMENT
IM-
PROVEMENT PROGRAM.—Not more than 25 per-
cent of the amounts collected by an execu-
tive agency through recovery audits—
(i) shall be available to the head of the
executive agency to carry out the finan-
cial management improvement program of
the executive agency under paragraph (3);
(ii) may be credited, if applicable, for the
purpose described in clause (i) by the head
of an executive agency to any executive
agency appropriations and funds that are
available for obligation at the time of col-
lection; and
(iii) shall be used to supplement and not
supplant any other amounts available for
the purpose described in clause (i) and
shall remain available until expended.
(D) USE FOR ORIGINAL PURPOSE.—Not more
than 25 percent of the amounts collected by
an executive agency through recovery au-
dits—
(i) shall be credited to the appropriation
or fund, if any, available for obligation at
Page 262
TITLE 31—MONEY AND FINANCE
§ 3352
the time of collection for the same general
purposes as the appropriation or fund from
which the overpayment was made;
(ii) shall remain available for the same
period and purposes as the appropriation
or fund to which credited; and
(iii) if the appropriation from which an
overpayment was made has expired—
(I) in the case of recoveries of overpay-
ments that are made from a trust or spe-
cial fund account, shall revert to that
account; and
(II) in the case of other recoveries of
overpayments—
(aa) for amounts that are recovered
more than 5 fiscal years from the last
fiscal year in which the funds were
available for obligation, shall be depos-
ited in the Treasury as miscellaneous
receipts; and
(bb) for other amounts, shall be
newly available for the same time pe-
riod as the funds were originally avail-
able for obligation.
(E) USE
FOR
INSPECTOR
GENERAL
ACTIVI-
TIES.—Not more than 5 percent of the
amounts collected by an executive agency
through recovery audits—
(i) shall be available to the Inspector
General of that executive agency for—
(I) the Inspector General to carry out
this Act; or
(II) any other activities of the Inspec-
tor General relating to investigating im-
proper payments or auditing internal
controls associated with payments; and
(ii) shall remain available for the same
period and purposes as the appropriation
or fund to which credited.
(F) REMAINDER.—Amounts collected that
are not applied in accordance with subpara-
graph (B), (C), (D), or (E) shall be deposited
in the Treasury as miscellaneous receipts,
except that in the case of recoveries of over-
payments that are made from trust or spe-
cial fund accounts, those amounts shall re-
vert to those accounts.
(G) DISCRETIONARY
AMOUNTS.—This para-
graph shall apply only to recoveries of over-
payments that are made from discretionary
appropriations, as defined in section 250(c)(7)
of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Def-
icit Control Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 900(c)(7)),
and shall not apply to recoveries of overpay-
ments that are made from discretionary
amounts that were appropriated before the
date of enactment of the Improper Payments
Elimination and Recovery Act of 2010, as in
effect on the day before the date of enact-
ment of this section.
(H) APPLICATION.—This paragraph shall
not apply to the recovery of an overpayment
if the appropriation from which the overpay-
ment was made has not expired.
(3) FINANCIAL
MANAGEMENT
IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM.—
(A) REQUIREMENT.—The head of each exec-
utive agency shall conduct a financial man-
agement improvement program consistent
with rules prescribed by the Director of the
Office of Management and Budget.
(B) PROGRAM FEATURES.—In conducting a
program described in subparagraph (A), the
head of an executive agency—
(i) shall, as the first priority of the pro-
gram, address problems that contribute di-
rectly to executive agency improper pay-
ments; and
(ii) may seek to reduce errors and waste
in other executive agency programs and
operations.
(4) PRIVACY
PROTECTIONS.—Any nongovern-
mental entity that, in the course of recovery
auditing or recovery activity under this sub-
section, obtains information that identifies an
individual or with respect to which there is a
reasonable basis to believe that the informa-
tion can be used to identify an individual, may
not disclose the information for any purpose
other than the recovery auditing or recovery
activity and governmental oversight of the ac-
tivity, unless disclosure for that other purpose
is authorized by the individual to the execu-
tive agency that contracted for the perform-
ance of the recovery auditing or recovery ac-
tivity.
(5) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Except as pro-
vided under paragraph (4), nothing in this sub-
section shall be construed as terminating or in
any way limiting authorities that are other-
wise available to executive agencies under ex-
isting provisions of law to recover improper
payments and use recovered amounts.
(Added Pub. L. 116–117, § 2(a), Mar. 2, 2020, 134
Stat. 114.)
Editorial Notes
REFERENCES IN TEXT
The date of enactment of this section, referred to in
subsecs. (g)(1), (h), and (i)(2)(G), is the date of enact-
ment of Pub. L. 116–117, which was approved Mar. 2,
2020.
Section 2(g) of the Improper Payments Elimination
and Recovery Act of 2010, referred to in subsec. (h), is
section 2(g) of Pub. L. 111–204, July 22, 2010, 124 Stat.
2228, which was formerly set out as a note under section
3321 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 116–117,
§ 3(a)(2), Mar. 2, 2020, 134 Stat. 133.
This Act, referred to in subsec. (i)(2)(E)(i)(I), probably
means Pub. L. 116–117, which enacted this subchapter,
amended section 3562 of this title, section 612 of Title
6, Domestic Security, and section 1397ee of Title 42, The
Public Health and Welfare, amended provisions set out
as a note under 5701 of Title 5, Government Organiza-
tion and Employees, and repealed provisions set out as
notes under sections 3301 and 3321 of this title. For com-
plete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short
Title of 2020 Amendment note set out under section 3301
of this title and Tables.
The date of enactment of the Improper Payments
Elimination and Recovery Act of 2010, referred to sub-
sec. (i)(2)(G), is the date of enactment of Pub. L.
111–204, which was approved July 22, 2010.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
CHANGE OF NAME
Committee on Oversight and Reform of House of Rep-
resentatives changed to Committee on Oversight and
Accountability of House of Representatives by House
Resolution No. 5, One Hundred Eighteenth Congress,
Jan. 9, 2023.
Page 263
TITLE 31—MONEY AND FINANCE
§ 3353
§ 3353. Compliance
(a) ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT BY INSPECTORS
GENERAL OF EXECUTIVE AGENCIES.—
(1) IN
GENERAL.—Each fiscal year, the In-
spector General of each executive agency
shall—
(A) determine whether the executive agen-
cy is in compliance; and
(B) submit a report on the determination
made under subparagraph (A) to—
(i) the head of the executive agency;
(ii) the Committee on Homeland Secu-
rity and Governmental Affairs of the Sen-
ate;
(iii) the Committee on Oversight and Re-
form of the House of Representatives; and
(iv) the Comptroller General of the
United States.
(2) DEVELOPMENT
OR
USE
OF
A
CENTRAL
WEBSITE.—The Council of the Inspectors Gen-
eral on Integrity and Efficiency (in this sub-
section referred to as the ‘‘Council’’) shall de-
velop a public central website, or make use of
a public central website in existence on the
date of enactment of this section, to contain
individual compliance determination reports
issued by Inspectors General under paragraph
(1)(B) and such additional information as de-
termined by the Council.
(3) OMB GUIDANCE.—Not later than 180 days
after the date of enactment of this section, the
Director of the Office of Management and
Budget, in consultation with the Council and
with consideration given to the available re-
sources and independence of individual Offices
of Inspectors General, shall develop and pro-
mulgate guidance for the compliance deter-
mination reports issued by the Inspectors Gen-
eral under paragraph (1)(B), which shall re-
quire that—
(A) the reporting format used by the In-
spectors General is consistent;
(B) Inspectors General evaluate and take
into account the adequacy of executive
agency risk assessments, improper payment
estimates methodology, and executive agen-
cy action plans to address the causes of im-
proper payments;
(C) Inspectors General take into account
whether the executive agency has correctly
identified the causes of improper payments
and whether the actions of the executive
agency to address those causes are adequate
and effective;
(D) Inspectors General evaluate the ade-
quacy of executive agency action plans on
how the executive agency addresses the
causes of improper payments; and
(E) as part of the report, Inspectors Gen-
eral include an evaluation of executive agen-
cy efforts to prevent and reduce improper
payments and any recommendations for ac-
tions to further improve that prevention and
reduction.
(4) CIGIE GUIDANCE.—Not later than 180 days
after the date of enactment of this section, the
Council shall, with consideration given to the
available resources and independence of indi-
vidual Offices of Inspectors General, develop
and promulgate guidance that specifies proce-
dures for compliance determinations made by
the Inspectors General under paragraph (1)(A),
which shall describe procedures for Inspectors
General—
(A) to make the determinations consistent
regarding compliance; and
(B) to evaluate—
(i) for compliance with the requirement
described in section 3351(2)(B), the risk as-
sessment methodology of the executive
agency, including whether the audits, ex-
aminations, and legal actions of the In-
spector General indicate a higher risk of
improper payments or actual improper
payments that were not included in the
risk assessments of the executive agency
conducted under section 3352(a);
(ii) for compliance with the requirement
described in section 3351(2)(C), the accu-
racy of the rate estimates and whether the
sampling and estimation plan used is ap-
propriate given program characteristics;
(iii) for compliance with the requirement
described in section 3351(2)(D), the correc-
tive action plans and whether the plans
are adequate and focused on the true
causes of improper payments, including
whether the corrective action plans are—
(I) reducing improper payments;
(II) effectively implemented; and
(III) prioritized within the executive
agency;
(iv) the adequacy of executive agency ac-
tion plans to address the causes of im-
proper payments;
(v) executive agency efforts to prevent
and reduce improper payments, and any
recommendations for actions to further
improve; and
(vi) whether an executive agency has
published an annual financial statement in
accordance with the requirement described
in section 3351(2)(A).
(b) REMEDIATION.—
(1) NONCOMPLIANCE.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—If an executive agency is
determined by the Inspector General of that
executive agency not to be in compliance
under subsection (a) in a fiscal year with re-
spect to a program or activity, the head of
the executive agency shall submit to the ap-
propriate authorizing and appropriations
committees of Congress a plan describing
the actions that the executive agency will
take to come into compliance.
(B) PLAN.—The plan described in subpara-
graph (A) shall include—
(i) measurable milestones to be accom-
plished in order to achieve compliance for
each program or activity;
(ii) the designation of a senior executive
agency official who shall be accountable
for the progress of the executive agency in
coming into compliance for each program
or activity; and
(iii) the establishment of an account-
ability mechanism, such as a performance
agreement, with appropriate incentives
and consequences tied to the success of the
official designated under clause (ii) in
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Omitted**
**(b) General statement of budget enforcement through sequestration** This subchapter provides for budget enforcement as called for in House Concurrent Resolution 84 (105th Congress, 1st session).
**(c) Definitions** As used in this subchapter:
(1) The terms “budget authority”, “new budget authority”, “outlays”, and “deficit” have the meanings given to such terms in section 3 of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 [[2 U.S.C. 622](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title2-section622&num=0&edition=prelim)] and “discretionary spending limit” shall mean the amounts specified in [section 901 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title2-section901&num=0&edition=prelim).
(2) The terms “sequester” and “sequestration” refer to or mean the cancellation of budgetary resources provided by discretionary appropriations or direct spending law.
(3) The term “breach” means, for any fiscal year, the amount (if any) by which new budget authority or outlays for that year (within a category of discretionary appropriations) is above that category’s discretionary spending limit for new budget authority or outlays for that year, as the case may be.
(4)
(A) The term “nonsecurity category” means all discretionary appropriations not included in the security category defined in subparagraph (B).
(B) The term “security category” includes discretionary appropriations associated with agency budgets for the Department of Defense, the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Veterans Affairs, the National Nuclear Security Administration, the intelligence community management account (95–0401–0–1–054), and all budget accounts in budget function 150 (international affairs).
(C
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 2 U.S.C. § 900
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 2 U.S.C. § 900. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 232
TITLE 2—THE CONGRESS
§ 900
(2) Qualification
An individual, organization, institution, or
business may qualify for an award under this
section only if such individual, organization,
institution, or business—
(A) is nominated to the Majority or Minor-
ity Leader of the Senate or to the Speaker
or the Minority Leader of the House of Rep-
resentatives by a member of the Senate or
the House of Representatives;
(B) permits a rigorous evaluation by the
Office of Technology Assessment of the way
in which such individual, organization, insti-
tution, or business has demonstrated excel-
lence in promoting United States industrial
competitiveness; and
(C) meets such other requirements as the
selection panel determines to be appropriate
to achieve the objectives of this section.
(3) Evaluation
An evaluation of each nominee shall be con-
ducted by the Office of Technology Assess-
ment. The Office of Technology Assessment
shall work with the selection panel to estab-
lish appropriate procedures for evaluating
nominees.
(4) Panel review
The selection panel shall review the Office of
Technology Assessment’s evaluation of each
nominee and may, based on those evaluations,
recommend 1 award winner for each year for
each category described in subsection (b)(1) to
the Majority and Minority Leaders of the Sen-
ate and the Speaker and the Minority Leader
of the House of Representatives.
(d) Presentation of award
(1) In general
The Majority and Minority Leaders of the
Senate and the Speaker and the Minority
Leader of the House of Representatives shall
make the award to an individual and an orga-
nization, institution, or business that has
demonstrated excellence in promoting United
States industrial competitiveness in the inter-
national marketplace t
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 2 U.S.C. § 900
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 2 U.S.C. § 900. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Identification of Susceptible Programs and Activities.—**
(1) **In general.—** — The head of each executive agency shall, in accordance with guidance prescribed by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget—
(A) periodically review all programs and activities that the head of the executive agency administers; and
(B) identify all programs and activities with outlays exceeding the statutory threshold dollar amount described in paragraph (3)(A)(i) that may be susceptible to significant improper payments.
(2) **Frequency.—** — A review under paragraph (1) shall be performed for each program and activity that the head of an executive agency administers not less frequently than once every 3 fiscal years.
(3) **Risk assessments.—**
(A) *Definition of significant.—* — In this paragraph, the term “significant” means that, in the preceding fiscal year, the sum of a program or activity’s improper payments and payments whose propriety cannot be determined by the executive agency due to lacking or insufficient documentation may have exceeded—
(i) $10,000,000 of all reported program or activity payments of the executive agency made during that fiscal year and 1.5 percent of program outlays; or
(ii) $100,000,000.
(B) *Scope.—* — In conducting a review under paragraph (1), the head of each executive agency shall take into account those risk factors that are likely to contribute to a susceptibility to significant improper payments, such as—
(i) whether the program or activity reviewed is new to the executive agency;
(ii) the complexity of the program or activity reviewed;
(iii) the volume of payments made through the program or activity reviewed;
(iv) whether payments or payment eligibility decisions are made outside of the ex
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 31 U.S.C. § 3352
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.