Arkansas Legal Resource Navigator

42 U.S.C. § 19231 — National research and development strategy for distributed ledger technology

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

42 U.S.C. § 19231 — National research and development strategy for distributed ledger technology

**(a) Definitions** In this section: (1) **Director** — Except as otherwise expressly provided, the term “Director” means the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy. (2) **Distributed ledger** — The term “distributed ledger” means a ledger that— (A) is shared across a set of distributed nodes, which are devices or processes, that participate in a network and store a complete or partial replica of the ledger; (B) is synchronized between the nodes; (C) has data appended to it by following the ledger’s specified consensus mechanism; (D) may be accessible to anyone (public) or restricted to a subset of participants (private); and (E) may require participants to have authorization to perform certain actions (engaging) or require no authorization (permissionless). (3) **Distributed ledger technology** — The term “distributed ledger technology” means technology that enables the operation and use of distributed ledgers. (4) **Institution of higher education** — The term “institution of higher education” has the meaning given the term in [section 1001 of title 20](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title20-section1001&num=0&edition=prelim). (5) **Relevant congressional committees** — The term “relevant congressional committees” means— (A) the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate; and (B) the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives. (6) **Smart contract** — The term “smart contract” means a computer program stored in a distributed ledger system that is executed when certain predefined conditions are satisfied and wherein the outcome of any execution of the program may be recorded on the distributed ledger. **(b) National distributed ledger technol

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 42 U.S.C. § 19231

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.

Original supplied file — preserved unchanged

Download original Markdown file

File SHA-256: 761d56b944ffa701f6c4c5e2361131e13c96793644120cfb3e2dd3bc0e618190. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.

Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.

Open the recorded source website ↗

Record provenance

Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:record_usc_5f076f8842bc5c2f80b6d176
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code/title-42/section-19231-national-research-and-development-strategy-for-distributed-ledger-techno--a9eed44d86.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: f865b549e987efade4ac0cea085ee2eba79d24d4e67a44447851609df9f036f5

Source location: Title 42, Chapter 163, § 19231; chapter-163-research-and-development-competition-and-innovation.md

Stored source content

**(a) Definitions** In this section: (1) **Director** — Except as otherwise expressly provided, the term “Director” means the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy. (2) **Distributed ledger** — The term “distributed ledger” means a ledger that— (A) is shared across a set of distributed nodes, which are devices or processes, that participate in a network and store a complete or partial replica of the ledger; (B) is synchronized between the nodes; (C) has data appended to it by following the ledger’s specified consensus mechanism; (D) may be accessible to anyone (public) or restricted to a subset of participants (private); and (E) may require participants to have authorization to perform certain actions (engaging) or require no authorization (permissionless). (3) **Distributed ledger technology** — The term “distributed ledger technology” means technology that enables the operation and use of distributed ledgers. (4) **Institution of higher education** — The term “institution of higher education” has the meaning given the term in [section 1001 of title 20](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title20-section1001&num=0&edition=prelim). (5) **Relevant congressional committees** — The term “relevant congressional committees” means— (A) the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate; and (B) the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives. (6) **Smart contract** — The term “smart contract” means a computer program stored in a distributed ledger system that is executed when certain predefined conditions are satisfied and wherein the outcome of any execution of the program may be recorded on the distributed ledger. **(b) National distributed ledger technology research and development strategy** (1) **In general** — The Director, or a designee of the Director, shall, in coordination with the National Science and Technology Council, and the heads of such other relevant Federal agencies and entities as the Director considers appropriate, which may include the National Academies, and in consultation with such nongovernmental entities as the Director considers appropriate, develop a national strategy for the research and development of distributed ledger technologies and their applications, including applications of public and permissionless distributed ledgers. In developing the national strategy, the Director shall consider the following: (A) Current efforts and coordination by Federal agencies to invest in the research and development of distributed ledger technologies and their applications, including through programs like the Small Business Innovation Research program, the Small Business Technology Transfer program, and the National Science Foundation’s Innovation Corps programs. (B) (i) The potential benefits and risks of applications of distributed ledger technologies across different industry sectors, including their potential to— (I) lower transactions costs and facilitate new types of commercial transactions; (II) protect privacy and increase individuals’ data sovereignty; (III) reduce friction to the interoperability of digital systems; (IV) increase the accessibility, auditability, security, efficiency, and transparency of digital services; (V) increase market competition in the provision of digital services; (VI) enable dynamic contracting and contract execution through smart contracts; (VII) enable participants to collaborate in trustless and disintermediated environments; (VIII) enable the operations and governance of distributed organizations; (IX) create new ownership models for digital items; and (X) increase participation of populations historically underrepresented in the technology, business, and financial sectors. (ii) In consideration of the potential risks of applications of distributed ledger technologies under clause (i), the Director shall take into account, where applicable— (I) additional risks that may emerge from distributed ledger technologies, as identified in reports submitted to the President pursuant to Executive Order 14067, that may be addressed by research and development; (II) software vulnerabilities in distributed ledger technologies and smart contracts; (III) limited consumer literacy on engaging with applications of distributed ledger technologies in a secure way; (IV) the use of distributed ledger technologies in illicit finance and their use in combating illicit finance; (V) manipulative, deceptive, and fraudulent practices that harm consumers engaging with applications of distributed ledger technologies; (VI) the implications of different consensus mechanisms for digital ledgers and governance and accountability mechanisms for applications of distributed ledger technologies, which may include decentralized networks; (VII) foreign activities in the development and deployment of distributed ledger technologies and their associated tools and infrastructure; and (VIII) environmental, sustainability, and economic impacts of the computational resources required for distributed ledger technologies. (C) Potential uses for distributed ledger technologies that could improve the operations and delivery of services by Federal agencies, taking into account the potential of digital ledger technologies to— (i) improve the efficiency and effectiveness of privacy-preserving data sharing among Federal agencies and with State, local, territorial, and Tribal governments; (ii) promote government transparency by improving data sharing with the public; (iii) introduce or mitigate risks that may threaten individuals’ rights or broad access to Federal services; (iv) automate and modernize processes for assessing and ensuring regulatory compliance; and (v) facilitate broad access to financial services for underserved and underbanked populations. (D) Ways to support public and private sector dialogue on areas of research that could enhance the efficiency, scalability, interoperability, security, and privacy of applications using distributed ledger technologies. (E) The need for increased coordination of the public and private sectors on the development of voluntary standards in order to promote research and development, including standards regarding security, smart contracts, cryptographic protocols, virtual routing and forwarding, interoperability, zero-knowledge proofs, and privacy, for distributed ledger technologies and their applications. (F) Applications of distributed ledger technologies that could positively benefit society but that receive relatively little private sector investment. (G) The United States position in global leadership and competitiveness across research, development, and deployment of distributed ledger technologies. (2) **Consultation** (A) *In general* — In carrying out the Director’s duties under this subsection, the Director shall consult with the following: (i) Private industry. (ii) Institutions of higher education, including minority-serving institutions. (iii) Nonprofit organizations, including foundations dedicated to supporting distributed ledger technologies and their applications. (iv) State governments. (v) Such other persons as the Director considers appropriate. (B) *Representation* — The Director shall ensure consultations with the following: (i) Rural and urban stakeholders from across the Nation. (ii) Small, medium, and large businesses. (iii) Subject matter experts representing multiple industrial sectors. (iv) A demographically diverse set of stakeholders. (3) **Coordination** — In carrying out this subsection, the Director shall, for purposes of avoiding duplication of activities, consult, cooperate, and coordinate with the programs and policies of other relevant Federal agencies, including the interagency process outlined in section 3 of Executive Order 14067 (87 Fed. Reg. 14143; relating ensuring responsible development of digital assets). (4) **National strategy** — Not later than 1 year after December 23, 2022, the Director shall submit to the relevant congressional committees and the President a national strategy that includes the following: (A) Priorities for the research and development of distributed ledger technologies and their applications. (B) Plans to support public and private sector investment and partnerships in research and technology development for societally beneficial applications of distributed ledger technologies. (C) Plans to mitigate the risks of distributed ledger technologies and their applications. (D) An identification of additional resources, administrative action, or legislative action recommended to assist with the implementation of such strategy. (5) **Research and development funding** — The Director shall, as the Director considers necessary, consult with the Director of the Office of Management and Budget and with the heads of such other elements of the Executive Office of the President as the Director considers appropriate, to ensure that the recommendations and priorities with respect to research and development funding, as expressed in the national strategy developed under this subsection, are incorporated in the development of annual budget requests for Federal research agencies. **(c) Distributed ledger technology research** (1) **In general** — Subject to the availability of appropriations, the Director of the National Science Foundation shall make awards, on a competitive basis, to institutions of higher education, including minority-serving institutions, or nonprofit organizations (or consortia of such institutions or organizations) to support research, including interdisciplinary research, on distributed ledger technologies, their applications, and other issues that impact or are caused by distributed ledger technologies, which may include research on— (A) the implications on trust, transparency, privacy, accessibility, accountability, and energy consumption of different consensus mechanisms and hardware choices, and approaches for addressing these implications; (B) approaches for improving the security, privacy, resiliency, interoperability, performance, and scalability of distributed ledger technologies and their applications, which may include decentralized networks; (C) approaches for identifying and addressing vulnerabilities and improving the performance and expressive power of smart contracts; (D) the implications of quantum computing on applications of distributed ledger technologies, including long-term protection of sensitive information (such as medical or digital property), and techniques to address them; (E) game theory, mechanism design, and economics underpinning and facilitating the operations and governance of decentralized networks enabled by distributed ledger technologies; (F) the social behaviors of participants in decentralized networks enabled by distributed ledger technologies; (G) human-centric design approaches to make distributed ledger technologies and their applications more usable and accessible; (H) use cases for distributed ledger technologies across various industry sectors and government, including applications pertaining to— (i) digital identity, including trusted identity and identity management; (ii) digital property rights; (iii) delivery of public services; (iv) supply chain transparency; (v) medical information management; (vi) inclusive financial services; (vii) community governance; (viii) charitable giving; (ix) public goods funding; (x) digital credentials; (xi) regulatory compliance; (xii) infrastructure resilience, including against natural disasters; and (xiii) peer-to-peer transactions; and (I) the social, behavioral, and economic implications associated with the growth of applications of distributed ledger technologies, including decentralization in business, financial, and economic systems. (2) **Accelerating innovation** — The Director of the National Science Foundation shall consider continuing to support startups that are in need of funding, would develop in and contribute to the economy of the United States, leverage distributed ledger technologies, have the potential to positively benefit society, and have the potential for commercial viability, through programs like the Small Business Innovation Research program, the Small Business Technology Transfer program, and, as appropriate, other programs that promote broad and diverse participation. (3) **Consideration of national distributed ledger technology research and development strategy** — In making awards under paragraph (1), the Director of the National Science Foundation shall take into account the national strategy, as described in subsection (b)(4). (4) **Fundamental research** — The Director of the National Science Foundation shall consider continuing to make awards supporting fundamental research in areas related to distributed ledger technologies and their applications, such as applied cryptography and distributed systems. **(d) Distributed ledger technology applied research project** (1) **Applied research project** — Subject to the availability of appropriations, the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, may carry out an applied research project to study and demonstrate the potential benefits and unique capabilities of distributed ledger technologies. (2) **Activities** — In carrying out the applied research project, the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology shall— (A) identify potential applications of distributed ledger technologies, including those that could benefit activities at the Department of Commerce or at other Federal agencies, considering applications that could— (i) improve the privacy and interoperability of digital identity and access management solutions; (ii) increase the integrity and transparency of supply chains through the secure and limited sharing of relevant supplier information; (iii) facilitate broader participation in distributed ledger technologies of populations historically underrepresented in technology, business, and financial sectors; or (iv) be of benefit to the public or private sectors, as determined by the Director in consultation with relevant stakeholders; (B) solicit and provide the opportunity for public comment relevant to potential projects; (C) consider, in the selection of a project, whether the project addresses a pressing need not already addressed by another organization or Federal agency; (D) establish plans to mitigate potential risks, including those outlined in subsection (b)(1)(B)(ii), if applicable, of potential projects; (E) produce an example solution leveraging distributed ledger technologies for 1 of the applications identified in subparagraph (A); (F) hold a competitive process to select private sector partners, if they are engaged, to support the implementation of the example solution; (G) consider hosting the project at the National Cybersecurity Center of Excellence; and (H) ensure that cybersecurity best practices consistent with the Cybersecurity Frame work of the National Institute of Standards and Technology are demonstrated in the project. (3) **Briefings to Congress** — Not later than 1 year after December 23, 2022, the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology shall offer a briefing to the relevant congressional committees on the progress and current findings from the project under this subsection. (4) **Public report** — Not later than 12 months after the completion of the project under this subsection, the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology shall make public a report on the results and findings from the project.

Cross-references

Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

20 U.S.C. § 1001 — General definition of institution of higher education

**(a) Institution of higher education** For purposes of this chapter, other than subchapter IV, the term “institution of higher education” means an educational institution in any State that— (1) admits as regular students only persons having a certificate of graduation from a school providing secondary education, or the recognized equivalent of such a certificate, or persons who meet the requirements of [section 1091(d) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title20-section1091/d&num=0&edition=prelim); (2) is legally authorized within such State to provide a program of education beyond secondary education; (3) provides an educational program for which the institution awards a bachelor’s degree or provides not less than a 2-year program that is acceptable for full credit toward such a degree, or awards a degree that is acceptable for admission to a graduate or professional degree program, subject to review and approval by the Secretary; (4) is a public or other nonprofit institution; and (5) is accredited by a nationally recognized accrediting agency or association, or if not so accredited, is an institution that has been granted preaccreditation status by such an agency or association that has been recognized by the Secretary for the granting of preaccreditation status, and the Secretary has determined that there is satisfactory assurance that the institution will meet the accreditation standards of such an agency or association within a reasonable time. **(b) Additional institutions included** For purposes of this chapter, other than subchapter IV, the term “institution of higher education” also includes— (1) any school that provides not less than a 1-year program of training to prepare students for gainful employment in a re

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 20 U.S.C. § 1001

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

31 U.S.C. § 5101 — Decimal system

United States money is expressed in dollars, dimes or tenths, cents or hundreths,11 So in original. Probably should be “hundredths,”. and mills or thousandths. A dime is a tenth of a dollar, a cent is a hundredth of a dollar, and a mill is a thousandth of a dollar.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 31 U.S.C. § 5101

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

42 U.S.C. § 19032 — Office of Research Security and Policy

The Director shall maintain a Research Security and Policy office within the Office of the Director with not fewer than four full-time equivalent positions, in addition to the Chief of Research Security established pursuant to [section 19032 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title42-section19032&num=0&edition=prelim). The functions of the Research Security and Policy office shall be to coordinate all research security policy issues across the Foundation, including by— (1) consulting and coordinating with the Foundation Office of Inspector General, with other Federal research agencies, and intelligence and law enforcement agencies, and the National Science and Technology Council, as appropriate, in accordance with the authority provided under section 1746 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92; [42 U.S.C. 6601](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title42-section6601&num=0&edition=prelim) note), to identify and address potential security risks that threaten research integrity and other risks to the research enterprise and to develop research security policy and best practices, taking into account the policy guidelines to be issued by the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy under [section 19231 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title42-section19231&num=0&edition=prelim); (2) serving as a resource at the Foundation for all issues related to the security and integrity of the conduct of Foundation-supported research; (3) conducting outreach and education activities for recipients on research policies and potential security risks and on policies and activities to protect intellectual property and informat

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 42 U.S.C. § 19032

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Incoming connection: Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

42 U.S.C. § 242v — Foreign talent recruitment programs

**(a) Intramural research** (1) **In general** — Not later than 60 days after December 29, 2022, the Secretary of Health and Human Services (referred to in sections 242v to 242v–3 of this title as the “Secretary”) shall prohibit personnel of the National Institutes of Health engaged in intramural research from participation in foreign talent recruitment programs. (2) **Exemption** — Paragraph (1) shall not apply to participation in international conferences or other international exchanges, partnerships, or programs, for which such participation has been approved by the National Institutes of Health. In such circumstances, the National Institutes of Health shall ensure appropriate training is provided to the participant on how to respond to overtures from individuals associated with foreign talent recruitment programs. **(b) Extramural research** The Secretary shall require disclosure of participation in foreign talent recruitment programs, including the provision of copies of all grants, contracts, or other agreements related to such programs, and other supporting documentation related to such programs, as a condition of receipt of Federal extramural biomedical research funding awarded through the Department of Health and Human Services. **(c) Consistency** The Secretary shall ensure that the policies developed, updated, or issued pursuant to subsections (a) and (b) are, to the greatest extent practicable, consistent with the requirements of subtitle D of title VI of division B of Public Law 117–167 ([42 U.S.C. 19231](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title42-section19231&num=0&edition=prelim) et seq.) related to foreign talent recruitment programs.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 42 U.S.C. § 242v

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Incoming connection: Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

42 U.S.C. § 19231 — Requirements for foreign talent recruit-

Page 9340 TITLE 42—THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE § 19231 1 So in original. Probably should be followed by a period. (3) Briefings to Congress Not later than 1 year after December 23, 2022, the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology shall offer a brief- ing to the relevant congressional committees on the progress and current findings from the project under this subsection. (4) Public report Not later than 12 months after the comple- tion of the project under this subsection, the Director of the National Institute of Stand- ards and Technology shall make public a re- port on the results and findings from the project. (Pub. L. 117–263, div. E, title LIX, § 5913, Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3443.) Editorial Notes REFERENCES IN TEXT Executive Order 14067, referred to in subsec. (b)(1)(B)(ii)(I), (3), is Ex. Ord. No. 14067, Mar. 9, 2022, 87 F.R. 14143, which is set out as a note preceding section 5101 of Title 31, Money and Finance. CODIFICATION Section was enacted as part of the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023, and not as part of the Research and Development, Competition, and Innovation Act which in part com- prises this chapter. PART C—RESEARCH SECURITY § 19231. Requirements for foreign talent recruit- ment programs (a) Purpose The purpose of this part is to direct actions to prohibit participation in any foreign talent re- cruitment program by personnel of Federal re- search agencies and to prohibit participation in a malign foreign talent recruitment program by covered individuals involved with research and development awards from those agencies. (b) Guidance Not later than 180 days after August 9, 2022, the Director of the Office of Science and Tech- nology Policy, in coord

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 42 U.S.C. § 19231

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.