Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Ohio is divided into two judicial districts to be known as the Northern and Southern Districts of Ohio.
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 28 U.S.C. § 115
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: c209b21e72cebd61c76988c75c2b73f3e18c0fcdc157a6d1117116d4f53dd06d. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:record_usc_56d29216be3655d5922f0224
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code/title-28/section-115-ohio--d62fdb8096.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 90e112025ca51285958f2952a0377ea8ad35e4f92052d2ef4f385145422e3ab6
Source location: Title 28, Chapter 5, § 115; chapter-005-district-courts.md
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a)** The chief judge of the district court, or such other district court judge as the plan may provide, on his initiative or upon recommendation of the clerk or jury commission, or the clerk under supervision of the court if the court’s jury selection plan so authorizes, shall determine solely on the basis of information provided on the juror qualification form and other competent evidence whether a person is unqualified for, or exempt, or to be excused from jury service. The clerk shall enter such determination in the space provided on the juror qualification form and in any alphabetical list of names drawn from the master jury wheel. If a person did not appear in response to a summons, such fact shall be noted on said list. **(b)** In making such determination the chief judge of the district court, or such other district court judge as the plan may provide, or the clerk if the court’s jury selection plan so provides, shall deem any person qualified to serve on grand and petit juries in the district court unless he— (1) is not a citizen of the United States eighteen years old who has resided for a period of one year within the judicial district; (2) is unable to read, write, and understand the English language with a degree of proficiency sufficient to fill out satisfactorily the juror qualification form; (3) is unable to speak the English language; (4) is incapable, by reason of mental or physical infirmity, to render satisfactory jury service; or (5) has a charge pending against him for the commission of, or has been convicted in a State or Federal court of record of, a crime punishable by imprisonment for more than one year and his civil rights have not been restored.
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 28 U.S.C. § 1865
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
### Statutory Notes Section, acts June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 898; Oct. 9, 1962, Pub. L. 87–764, 76 Stat. 762; Nov. 19, 1977, Pub. L. 95–196, 91 Stat. 1420, related to the providing of accommodations at places for holding court. See [section 462 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title28-section462&num=0&edition=prelim). #### Effective Date of Repeal Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as an Effective Date of 1982 Amendment note under [section 171 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title28-section171&num=0&edition=prelim). #### Waiver of Limitations and Restrictions The limitations and restrictions contained in this section prior to its repeal were waived with respect to the holding of court at certain places by the following Acts: Pub. L. 87–833, Oct. 15, 1962, 76 Stat. 959, related to Akron, Ohio. Pub. L. 87–699, Sept. 25, 1962, 76 Stat. 598, related to Richland, Washington. Pub. L. 87–562, § 4, July 30, 1962, 76 Stat. 248, related to Fort Myers, Saint Petersburg, Fort Pierce, and West Palm Beach, Florida. Pub. L. 87–560, July 27, 1962, 76 Stat. 247, related to Marshall, Texas. Pub. L. 87–559, July 27, 1962, 76 Stat. 246, related to Decatur, Alabama. Pub. L. 87–553, July 27, 1962, 76 Stat. 222, related to Winchester, Tennessee. Pub. L. 87–551, July 27, 1962, 76 Stat. 221, related to Bridgeport, Connecticut. Pub. L. 87–337, Oct. 3, 1961, 75 Stat. 750, related to Lafayette, Louisiana. Pub. L. 87–36, § 3(g), May 19, 1961, 75 Stat. 83, related to Kalamazoo, Michigan; Fayetteville, North Carolina; and Dyersburg, Tennessee. Pub. L. 86–366, Sept. 22, 1959, 73 Stat. 647, related to Durant, Oklahoma. Act July 20, 1956, ch. 657, 70 Stat. 594
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 28 U.S.C. § 142
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 46 TITLE 28—JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE § 114 1 So in original. Probably should be followed by a comma. omitted as obsolete upon advice of the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts that Federal accommodations are now available in such places. The provisions respecting court accommodations at Bryson City and Shelby were omitted as covered by section 142 of this title. Changes in arrangement and phraseology were made. Editorial Notes AMENDMENTS 2021—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 117–26, § 1(a)(1), substituted ‘‘Wilson, those portions of Hoke, Moore, Scotland, and Richmond counties encompassing the Fort Bragg Mili- tary Reservation and Camp Mackall, and’’ for ‘‘and Wilson and’’. Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 117–26, § 1(a)(2), added subsec. (b) and struck out former subsec. (b) which read as follows: ‘‘The Middle District comprises the counties of Alamance, Cabarrus, Caswell, Chatham, Davidson, Davie, Durham (excluding that portion of Durham County encompassing the Federal Correctional Institu- tion, Butner, North Carolina), Forsythe, Guilford, Hoke, Lee, Montgomery, Moore, Orange, Person, Ran- dolph, Richmond, Rockingham, Rowan, Scotland, Stanly, Stokes, Surry, and Yadkin.’’ Amendment di- recting striking out subsec. (b) was executed only to the first paragraph and not the concluding sentence, to reflect the probable intent of Congress. 1992—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 102–272, which directed the amendment of subsec. (a) by striking out ‘‘Clinton,’’ and ‘‘Washington,’’ and inserting ‘‘Greenville,’’ after ‘‘Fayetteville,’’, was executed to the second sentence to reflect the probable intent of Congress. 1980—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 96–462, § 5(a), added that por- tion of Durham County encompassing the Federal Cor- rectional Institu
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 28 U.S.C. § 115
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.