Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
28 U.S.C. § 115 — Ohio
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 46
TITLE 28—JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE
§ 114
1 So in original. Probably should be followed by a comma.
omitted as obsolete upon advice of the Director of the
Administrative Office of the United States Courts that
Federal accommodations are now available in such
places.
The provisions respecting court accommodations at
Bryson City and Shelby were omitted as covered by
section 142 of this title.
Changes in arrangement and phraseology were made.
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
2021—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 117–26, § 1(a)(1), substituted
‘‘Wilson, those portions of Hoke, Moore, Scotland, and
Richmond counties encompassing the Fort Bragg Mili-
tary Reservation and Camp Mackall, and’’ for ‘‘and
Wilson and’’.
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 117–26, § 1(a)(2), added subsec. (b)
and struck out former subsec. (b) which read as follows:
‘‘The Middle District comprises the counties of
Alamance, Cabarrus, Caswell, Chatham, Davidson,
Davie, Durham (excluding that portion of Durham
County encompassing the Federal Correctional Institu-
tion, Butner, North Carolina), Forsythe, Guilford,
Hoke, Lee, Montgomery, Moore, Orange, Person, Ran-
dolph,
Richmond,
Rockingham,
Rowan,
Scotland,
Stanly, Stokes, Surry, and Yadkin.’’ Amendment di-
recting striking out subsec. (b) was executed only to
the first paragraph and not the concluding sentence, to
reflect the probable intent of Congress.
1992—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 102–272, which directed the
amendment of subsec. (a) by striking out ‘‘Clinton,’’
and ‘‘Washington,’’ and inserting ‘‘Greenville,’’ after
‘‘Fayetteville,’’, was executed to the second sentence to
reflect the probable intent of Congress.
1980—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 96–462, § 5(a), added that por-
tion of Durham County encompassing the Federal Cor-
rectional Institu
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 28 U.S.C. § 115
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: 8b71dd85643711e214d95f07f7cb9f625f1a3d976a0caf62eb1db16e1621df2a. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-8fce3e5aea7c5937c70833e5
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-28/section-115-ohio--f59a135f1c.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: b2a438a698bcb5bd337e14fafa34e41ac33e84b076c1e6da3acfaa56f21a80be
Source location: USCODE-2024-title28-partI-chap5-sec115.pdf
Stored source content
Page 46
TITLE 28—JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE
§ 114
1 So in original. Probably should be followed by a comma.
omitted as obsolete upon advice of the Director of the
Administrative Office of the United States Courts that
Federal accommodations are now available in such
places.
The provisions respecting court accommodations at
Bryson City and Shelby were omitted as covered by
section 142 of this title.
Changes in arrangement and phraseology were made.
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
2021—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 117–26, § 1(a)(1), substituted
‘‘Wilson, those portions of Hoke, Moore, Scotland, and
Richmond counties encompassing the Fort Bragg Mili-
tary Reservation and Camp Mackall, and’’ for ‘‘and
Wilson and’’.
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 117–26, § 1(a)(2), added subsec. (b)
and struck out former subsec. (b) which read as follows:
‘‘The Middle District comprises the counties of
Alamance, Cabarrus, Caswell, Chatham, Davidson,
Davie, Durham (excluding that portion of Durham
County encompassing the Federal Correctional Institu-
tion, Butner, North Carolina), Forsythe, Guilford,
Hoke, Lee, Montgomery, Moore, Orange, Person, Ran-
dolph,
Richmond,
Rockingham,
Rowan,
Scotland,
Stanly, Stokes, Surry, and Yadkin.’’ Amendment di-
recting striking out subsec. (b) was executed only to
the first paragraph and not the concluding sentence, to
reflect the probable intent of Congress.
1992—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 102–272, which directed the
amendment of subsec. (a) by striking out ‘‘Clinton,’’
and ‘‘Washington,’’ and inserting ‘‘Greenville,’’ after
‘‘Fayetteville,’’, was executed to the second sentence to
reflect the probable intent of Congress.
1980—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 96–462, § 5(a), added that por-
tion of Durham County encompassing the Federal Cor-
rectional Institution, Butner, North Carolina to the
Eastern District.
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 96–462, § 5(b), struck out ref-
erences to Alleghany, Ashe, Watauga, and Wilkes coun-
ties in the list of counties comprising the Middle Dis-
trict; inserted ‘‘(excluding that portion of Durham
County encompassing the Federal Correctional Institu-
tion, Butner, North Carolina)’’ in first sentence as the
probable intent of Congress; and struck out Rocking-
ham, Salisbury, and Wilkesboro as places for holding
court.
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 96–462, § 5(c), added Alleghany,
Ashe, Watauga, and Wilkes counties to the Western
District.
1965—Pub. L. 89–319 provided for holding court at
Clinton.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2021 AMENDMENT
Pub. L. 117–26, § 1(b), July 6, 2021, 135 Stat. 299, pro-
vided that ‘‘The amendments made by subsection (a)
[amending this section] shall not apply to any action
commenced or pending in any judicial district of North
Carolina before the date of enactment of this Act [July
6, 2021].’’
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1980 AMENDMENT; SAVINGS
PROVISIONS
Amendment by Pub. L. 96–462 effective Oct. 1, 1981,
but not to affect the composition or preclude the serv-
ice of any grand or petit juror summoned, empaneled,
or actually serving in any judicial district on Oct. 1,
1981, see section 7 of Pub. L. 96–462, set out as a note
under section 84 of this title.
Pub. L. 96–462, § 5(d), Oct. 15, 1980, 94 Stat. 2054, pro-
vided that: ‘‘The amendments made by this section
[amending this section] shall not apply to any action
commenced before the effective date of such amend-
ments [Oct. 1, 1981] and pending in any judicial district
of North Carolina on such date.’’
§ 114. North Dakota
North Dakota constitutes one judicial district.
Court shall be held at Bismarck, Fargo, Grand
Forks, and Minot.
(Added Pub. L. 111–174, § 3, May 27, 2010, 124 Stat.
1216.)
Editorial Notes
PRIOR PROVISIONS
A prior section 114, act June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat.
886; Pub. L. 95–408, § 3(b), Oct. 2, 1978, 92 Stat. 883, which
provided that North Dakota consisted of one judicial
district comprising four divisions, was repealed by Pub.
L. 111–174, § 3, May 27, 2010, 124 Stat. 1216.
§ 115. Ohio
Ohio is divided into two judicial districts to be
known as the Northern and Southern Districts
of Ohio.
Northern District
(a) The Northern District comprises two divi-
sions.
(1) The Eastern Division comprises the coun-
ties of Ashland, Ashtabula, Carroll,
Columbiana,
Crawford,
Cuyahoga,
Geauga,
Holmes,
Lake,
Lorain,
Mahoning, Medina, Portage, Richland,
Stark, Summit, Trumbull, Tuscarawas,
and Wayne.
Court for the Eastern Division shall be held
at Cleveland, Youngstown, and Akron.
(2) The Western Division comprises the
counties of Allen, Auglaize, Defiance,
Erie, Fulton, Hancock, Hardin, Henry,
Huron, Lucas, Marion, Mercer, Ottawa,
Paulding, Putnam, Sandusky, Seneca,
Van Wert, Williams, Woods, and Wyan-
dot.
Court for the Western Division shall be held
at Lima and Toledo.
Southern District
(b) The Southern District comprises two divi-
sions.
(1) The Western Division comprises the
counties
of
Adams,
Brown,
Butler,
Champaign, Clark, Clermont, Clinton,
Darke,
Greene,
Hamilton,
Highland,
Lawrence, Miami, Montgomery, Preble,
Scioto, Shelby, and Warren.
Court for the Western Division shall be held
at Cincinnati and Dayton.
(2) The Eastern Division comprises the coun-
ties of Athens, Belmont, Coshocton,
Delaware, Fairfield, Fayette, Franklin,
Gallia, Guernsey, Harrison, Hocking,
Jackson,
Jefferson,
Knox,
Licking,
Logan, Madison, Meigs, Monroe, Morgan,
Morrow,
Muskingum,
Noble,
Perry,
Pickaway, Pike, Ross, Union, Vinton,
and Washington.
Court for the Eastern Division shall be held
at Columbus 1 St. Clairsville, and Steu-
benville.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 887; Feb. 10, 1954,
ch. 6, § 2(b)(9), 68 Stat. 11; Pub. L. 107–273, div. C,
title I, § 11021, Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1829.)
Page 47
TITLE 28—JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE
§ 117
HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., § 181 (Mar. 3, 1911,
ch. 231, § 100, 36 Stat. 1121; Mar. 4, 1915, ch. 159, 38 Stat.
1187; Feb. 14, 1923, ch. 78, 42 Stat. 1246).
Other provisions of said section 181 of title 28, U.S.C.,
1940 ed., are incorporated in section 1865 of this title.
Provisions relating to the place of institution or trial
of prosecutions and civil actions and transfer thereof
were omitted. Such provisions, as to civil cases, are
covered by section 1391 et seq. of this title, and as to
criminal cases, are rendered unnecessary because of in-
herent power of the court and Rules 18–20 of the Federal
Rules of Criminal Procedure relating to venue.
The provision respecting court accommodations at
Lima was omitted as covered by section 142 of this
title.
Changes were made in arrangement and phraseology.
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
2002—Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 107–273, which directed
amendment of par. (2) by inserting ‘‘St. Clairsville,’’
after ‘‘Columbus,’’, was executed by making the inser-
tion after ‘‘Columbus’’, to reflect the probable intent of
Congress.
1954—Subsec. (a)(1). Act Feb. 10, 1954, provided for
holding court at Akron.
§ 116. Oklahoma
Oklahoma is divided into three judicial dis-
tricts to be known as the Northern, Eastern, and
Western Districts of Oklahoma.
Northern District
(a) The Northern District comprises the coun-
ties of Craig, Creek, Delaware, Mayes, Nowata,
Osage, Ottawa, Pawnee, Rogers, Tulsa, and
Washington.
Court for the Northern District shall be held
at Bartlesville, Miami, Pawhuska, Tulsa,
and Vinita.
Eastern District
(b) The Eastern District comprises the coun-
ties of Adair, Atoka, Bryan, Carter, Cherokee,
Choctaw, Coal, Haskell, Hughes, Johnston, Lati-
mer, Le Flore Love, McCurtain, McIntosh, Mar-
shall, Murray, Muskogee, Okfuskee, Okmulgee,
Pittsburg, Pontotoc, Pushmataha, Seminole,
Sequoyah, and Wagoner.
Court for the Eastern District shall be held
at
Ada,
Ardmore,
Durant,
Hugo,
Muskogee, Okmulgee, Poteau, and S.
McAlester.
Western District
(c) The Western District comprises the coun-
ties of Alfalfa, Beaver, Beckham, Blaine, Caddo,
Canadian, Cimarron, Cleveland, Comanche, Cot-
ton, Custer, Dewey, Ellis, Garfield, Garvin,
Grady, Grant, Greer, Harmon, Harper, Jackson,
Jefferson, Kay, Kingfisher, Kiowa, Lincoln,
Logan,
McClain,
Major,
Noble,
Oklahoma,
Payne, Pottawatomie, Roger Mills, Stephens,
Texas, Tillman, Washita, Woods, and Woodward.
Court for the Western District shall be held
at Chickasha, Enid, Guthrie, Lawton,
Mangum, Oklahoma City, Pauls Valley,
Ponca City, Shawnee, and Woodward.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 887; Pub. L. 89–526,
§ 1, Aug. 4, 1966, 80 Stat. 335.)
HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§ 182, 182a (Mar. 3,
1911, ch. 231, § 101, 36 Stat. 1122; Feb. 20, 1917, ch. 102, 39
Stat. 927; June 13, 1918, ch. 98, 40 Stat. 604; Feb. 26, 1919,
ch. 54, 40 Stat. 1184; June 5, 1924, ch. 259, 43 Stat. 387;
Jan. 10, 1925, chs. 68, 69, 43 Stat. 730, 731; Feb. 16, 1925,
ch. 233, § 1, 43 Stat. 945; May 7, 1926, ch. 255, 44 Stat. 408;
Apr. 21, 1928, ch. 395, 45 Stat. 440; Mar. 2, 1929, ch. 539,
45 Stat. 1518; June 28, 1930, ch. 714, 46 Stat. 829; May 13,
1936, ch. 386, 49 Stat. 1271; Aug. 12, 1937, ch. 595, 50 Stat.
625).
Provisions for furnishing rooms and accommodations
at Ada, Bartlesville, Mangum, Miami, Okmulgee, and
Ponca City were omitted as obsolete, on advice of the
Director of the Administrative Office of the United
States Courts that Federal accommodations are now
available at such places.
A provision making inoperative the requirement for
furnishing court accommodations without cost to the
United States whenever the same shall be provided in
federal buildings at Shawnee, was omitted as unneces-
sary. When such buildings become available the Direc-
tor will, under section 604 of this title, provide court
accommodations therein.
A provision for adjournment of any term by an order
made in chambers, is incorporated in section 140 of this
title.
Provisions relating to maintenance of offices by the
clerks were omitted as covered by section 751 of this
title.
The provisions respecting court accommodations at
Durant, Hugo, Poteau, Pauls Valley, Pawhuska, and
Shawnee were omitted as covered by section 142 of this
title.
Changes in arrangement and phraseology were made.
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
1966—Pub. L. 89–526 transferred from the Eastern Dis-
trict in subsec. (b) to the Western District in subsec. (c)
the counties of Garvin, Grady, Jefferson, McClain, and
Stephens and the places for holding court at Chickasha
and Pauls Valley.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1966 AMENDMENT
Pub. L. 89–526, § 2, Aug. 4, 1966, 80 Stat. 335, provided
that: ‘‘The amendments made by this Act [amending
this section] shall take effect on the sixtieth day after
the date of enactment of this Act [Aug. 4, 1966].’’
§ 117. Oregon
Oregon constitutes one judicial district.
Court shall be held at Coquille, Eugene or
Springfield, Klamath Falls, Medford,
Pendleton, and Portland.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 888; Aug. 3, 1950,
ch. 514, 64 Stat. 393; Pub. L. 91–272, § 7, June 2,
1970, 84 Stat. 297; Pub. L. 106–518, title V, § 502,
Nov. 13, 2000, 114 Stat. 2422.)
HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., § 183 (Mar. 3, 1911,
ch. 231, § 102, 36 Stat. 1122; Nov. 6, 1945, ch. 447, 59 Stat.
555).
Provisions relating to appointment and residence of
deputies by the clerk and marshal, and maintenance of
offices by said officers, were omitted as covered by sec-
tions 541 [see 561], 542 [see 561], and 751 of this title.
Changes in arrangement and phraseology were made.
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
2000—Pub. L. 106–518 substituted ‘‘Eugene or Spring-
field’’ for ‘‘Eugene’’.
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Ohio is divided into two judicial districts to be known as the Northern and Southern Districts of Ohio.
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 28 U.S.C. § 115
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.