Arkansas Legal Resource Navigator

16 U.S.C. § 941 — Findings

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

16 U.S.C. § 941 — Findings

Page 1555 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 941a Sec. 941e. Establishment of offices. 941f. Reports. 941g. Authorization of appropriations. 941h. Great Lakes monitoring, assessment, science, and research. § 941. Findings Congress finds that— (1) the Great Lakes have fish and wildlife communities that are structurally and func- tionally changing; (2) successful fish and wildlife management focuses on the lakes as ecosystems, and effec- tive management requires the coordination and integration of efforts of many partners; (3) additional actions and better coordina- tion are needed to protect and effectively manage the fish and wildlife resources, and the habitats on which the resources depend, in the Great Lakes Basin; and (4) this chapter allows Federal agencies, States, and Indian tribes to work in an effec- tive partnership by providing the funding for restoration work. (Pub. L. 101–537, title I, § 1002, as added Pub. L. 114–322, title III, § 3901(b), Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1848.) Editorial Notes PRIOR PROVISIONS A prior section 941, Pub. L. 101–537, title I, § 1002, Nov. 8, 1990, 104 Stat. 2370; Pub. L. 101–646, title II, § 2002, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4773; Pub. L. 104–332, § 2(h)(1), Oct. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 4091; Pub. L. 105–265, § 3(b), Oct. 19, 1998, 112 Stat. 2358, related to Congressional findings, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 114–322, title III, § 3901(b), Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1848. Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries SHORT TITLE OF 2022 AMENDMENT Pub. L. 117–287, § 1, Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4363, pro- vided that: ‘‘This Act [amending sections 941f and 941g of this title] may be cited as the ‘Great Lakes Fish and Wildlife Restoration Reauthorization Act of 2022’.’’ SHORT TITLE OF 2006 AMENDMENT Pub. L. 109–326, § 1, Oc

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 16 U.S.C. § 941

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.

Original supplied file — preserved unchanged

Download original Markdown file

File SHA-256: 8e427dfe802f45c811d44d5a1a8d7cd6c1cf0546b60f2e36487b0fa3eea52446. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.

Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.

Open the recorded source website ↗

Record provenance

Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-feaef50d5943919f50829b8e
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-16/section-941-findings--385137e909.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: d9fc76b66ca22b0cdbffc5882e0e59fbc35a321b3ba393877159d4b19edd3067

Source location: USCODE-2024-title16-chap15B-sec941.pdf

Stored source content

Page 1555 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 941a Sec. 941e. Establishment of offices. 941f. Reports. 941g. Authorization of appropriations. 941h. Great Lakes monitoring, assessment, science, and research. § 941. Findings Congress finds that— (1) the Great Lakes have fish and wildlife communities that are structurally and func- tionally changing; (2) successful fish and wildlife management focuses on the lakes as ecosystems, and effec- tive management requires the coordination and integration of efforts of many partners; (3) additional actions and better coordina- tion are needed to protect and effectively manage the fish and wildlife resources, and the habitats on which the resources depend, in the Great Lakes Basin; and (4) this chapter allows Federal agencies, States, and Indian tribes to work in an effec- tive partnership by providing the funding for restoration work. (Pub. L. 101–537, title I, § 1002, as added Pub. L. 114–322, title III, § 3901(b), Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1848.) Editorial Notes PRIOR PROVISIONS A prior section 941, Pub. L. 101–537, title I, § 1002, Nov. 8, 1990, 104 Stat. 2370; Pub. L. 101–646, title II, § 2002, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4773; Pub. L. 104–332, § 2(h)(1), Oct. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 4091; Pub. L. 105–265, § 3(b), Oct. 19, 1998, 112 Stat. 2358, related to Congressional findings, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 114–322, title III, § 3901(b), Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1848. Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries SHORT TITLE OF 2022 AMENDMENT Pub. L. 117–287, § 1, Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4363, pro- vided that: ‘‘This Act [amending sections 941f and 941g of this title] may be cited as the ‘Great Lakes Fish and Wildlife Restoration Reauthorization Act of 2022’.’’ SHORT TITLE OF 2006 AMENDMENT Pub. L. 109–326, § 1, Oct. 11, 2006, 120 Stat. 1761, pro- vided that: ‘‘This Act [amending sections 941b to 941g of this title and enacting provisions set out as notes under this section] may be cited as the ‘Great Lakes Fish and Wildlife Restoration Act of 2006’.’’ SHORT TITLE OF 1998 AMENDMENT Pub. L. 105–265, § 1, Oct. 19, 1998, 112 Stat. 2358, pro- vided that: ‘‘This Act [amending this section and sec- tions 941 to 941g of this title and enacting provisions set out as a note under this section] may be cited as the ‘Great Lakes Fish and Wildlife Restoration Act of 1998’.’’ SHORT TITLE Pub. L. 101–537, title I, § 1001, Nov. 8, 1990, 104 Stat. 2370, and Pub. L. 101–646, title II, § 2001, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4773, as amended by Pub. L. 104–332, § 2(h)(1), Oct. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 4091, provided that: ‘‘This title [enact- ing this chapter] may be cited as the ‘Great Lakes Fish and Wildlife Restoration Act of 1990’.’’ Title II of Pub. L. 101–646 was repealed by Pub. L. 105–265, § 3(b), Oct. 19, 1998, 112 Stat. 2358. CONTINUED MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT OF STUDY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Pub. L. 109–326, § 8, Oct. 11, 2006, 120 Stat. 1766, which required the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service to monitor fish and wildlife resources of the Great Lakes Basin and to update findings and recommendations of the Great Lakes Fishery Re- sources Restoration Study, was repealed by Pub. L. 114–322, title III, § 3901(h), Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1851. CONGRESSIONAL FINDINGS Pub. L. 109–326, § 2, Oct. 11, 2006, 120 Stat. 1761, pro- vided that: ‘‘Congress finds that— ‘‘(1) the Great Lakes have fish and wildlife commu- nities that are structurally and functionally chang- ing; ‘‘(2) successful fish and wildlife management fo- cuses on the lakes as ecosystems, and effective man- agement requires the coordination and integration of efforts of many partners; ‘‘(3) it is in the national interest to undertake ac- tivities in the Great Lakes Basin that support sus- tainable fish and wildlife resources of common con- cern provided under the recommendations of the Great Lakes Regional Collaboration authorized under Executive Order 13340 (69 Fed. Reg. 29043; relating to the Great Lakes Interagency Task Force) [33 U.S.C. 1268 note]; ‘‘(4) additional actions and better coordination are needed to protect and effectively manage the fish and wildlife resources, and the habitats upon which the resources depend, in the Great Lakes Basin; ‘‘(5) as of the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 11, 2006], actions are not funded that are considered es- sential to meet the goals and objectives in managing the fish and wildlife resources, and the habitats upon which the resources depend, in the Great Lakes Basin; and ‘‘(6) the Great Lakes Fish and Wildlife Restoration Act [of 1990] (16 U.S.C. 941 et seq.) allows Federal agencies, States, and tribes to work in an effective partnership by providing the funding for restoration work.’’ Pub. L. 105–265, § 2, Oct. 19, 1998, 112 Stat. 2358, pro- vided that: ‘‘Congress finds that— ‘‘(1) the Great Lakes Fishery Resources Restoration Study, for which a report was submitted to Congress in 1995, was a comprehensive study of the status, and the assessment, management, and restoration needs, of the fishery resources of the Great Lakes Basin, and was conducted through the joint effort of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, State fish and wild- life resource management agencies, Indian tribes, and the Great Lakes Fishery Commission; and ‘‘(2) the study— ‘‘(A) found that, although State, Provincial, Na- tive American Tribal, and Federal agencies have made significant progress toward the goal of restor- ing a healthy fish community to the Great Lakes Basin, additional actions and better coordination are needed to protect and effectively manage the fisheries and related resources in the Great Lakes Basin; and ‘‘(B) recommended actions that are not currently funded but are considered essential to meet goals and objectives in managing the resources of the Great Lakes Basin.’’ § 941a. Purpose The purposes of this chapter are— (1) to develop and implement proposals for the restoration of fish and wildlife resources in the Great Lakes Basin; and (2) to provide assistance to the Great Lakes Fisheries Commission, States, Indian Tribes, and other interested entities to encourage co- operative conservation, restoration and man- agement of the fish and wildlife resources and their habitat in the Great Lakes Basin. (Pub. L. 101–537, title I, § 1003, Nov. 8, 1990, 104 Stat. 2371; Pub. L. 101–646, title II, § 2003, Nov. 29,

Cross-references

Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

16 U.S.C. § 941 — Findings

Congress finds that— (1) the Great Lakes have fish and wildlife communities that are structurally and functionally changing; (2) successful fish and wildlife management focuses on the lakes as ecosystems, and effective management requires the coordination and integration of efforts of many partners; (3) additional actions and better coordination are needed to protect and effectively manage the fish and wildlife resources, and the habitats on which the resources depend, in the Great Lakes Basin; and (4) this chapter allows Federal agencies, States, and Indian tribes to work in an effective partnership by providing the funding for restoration work.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 16 U.S.C. § 941

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

33 U.S.C. § 1268 — Great Lakes

**(a) Findings, purpose, and definitions** (1) **Findings** — The Congress finds that— (A) the Great Lakes are a valuable national resource, continuously serving the people of the United States and other nations as an important source of food, fresh water, recreation, beauty, and enjoyment; (B) the United States should seek to attain the goals embodied in the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement of 1978, as amended by the Water Quality Agreement of 1987 and any other agreements and amendments, with particular emphasis on goals related to toxic pollutants; and (C) the Environmental Protection Agency should take the lead in the effort to meet those goals, working with other Federal agencies and State and local authorities. (2) **Purpose** — It is the purpose of this section to achieve the goals embodied in the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement of 1978, as amended by the Water Quality Agreement of 1987 and any other agreements and amendments, through improved organization and definition of mission on the part of the Agency, funding of State grants for pollution control in the Great Lakes area, and improved accountability for implementation of such agreement. (3) **Definitions** — For purposes of this section, the term— (A) “Agency” means the Environmental Protection Agency; (B) “Great Lakes” means Lake Ontario, Lake Erie, Lake Huron (including Lake St. Clair), Lake Michigan, and Lake Superior, and the connecting channels (Saint Mary’s River, Saint Clair River, Detroit River, Niagara River, and Saint Lawrence River to the Canadian Border); (C) “Great Lakes System” means all the streams, rivers, lakes, and other bodies of water within the drainage basin of the Great Lakes; (D) “Program Office” means the Great Lakes National Program Office established

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 33 U.S.C. § 1268

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 33 U.S.C. § 1268. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

33 U.S.C. § 1268 — Great Lakes

Page 380 TITLE 33—NAVIGATION AND NAVIGABLE WATERS § 1268 (ii) a description of options for expanding public ac- cess at these agency sites; (iii) a description of agency sites where new oppor- tunities for public access might be provided; (iv) a description of safety and national security issues related to expanded public access to Depart- ment of Defense installations; (v) a description of landscapes and ecosystems in the Chesapeake Bay watershed that merit recogni- tion for their historical, cultural, ecological, or sci- entific values; and (vi) options for conserving these landscapes and ecosystems. (b) In developing the report addressing expanded pub- lic access on agency lands to the waters of the Chesa- peake Bay and options for conserving landscapes and ecosystems in the Chesapeake Bay, as required in sub- section 202(e) of this order, the Secretary of the Inte- rior shall coordinate any recommendations with State and local agencies in the watershed and programs such as the Captain John Smith Chesapeake National His- toric Trail, the Chesapeake Bay Gateways and Watertrails Network, and the Star-Spangled Banner National Historic Trail. PART 8—MONITORING AND DECISION SUPPORT FOR ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT SEC. 801. The Secretaries of Commerce and the Inte- rior shall, to the extent permitted by law, organize and conduct their monitoring, research, and scientific as- sessments to support decisionmaking for the Chesa- peake Bay ecosystem and to develop the report address- ing strengthening environmental monitoring of the Chesapeake Bay and its watershed required in section 202 of this order. This report will assess existing moni- toring programs and gaps in data collection, and shall also include the following topics: (a) the health of fish and w

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 33 U.S.C. § 1268

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 33 U.S.C. § 1268. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.