Arkansas Legal Resource Navigator

10 U.S.C. § 2273 — Policy regarding assured access to space:

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

10 U.S.C. § 2273 — Policy regarding assured access to space:

Page 1845 TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES § 2273 1 See Transfer of Functions note below. Editorial Notes PRIOR PROVISIONS Provisions similar to those in this section were con- tained in Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title XVI, § 1612, Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1729, which was set out in a note under section 2271 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 118–159, div. A, title XVI, § 1601(b), Dec. 23, 2024, 138 Stat. 2158. § 2272. Space science and technology strategy: co- ordination The Secretary of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence shall jointly develop and implement a space science and technology strat- egy and shall review and, as appropriate, revise the strategy biennially. Functions of the Sec- retary under this section shall be carried out jointly by the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering and the official of the Department of Defense designated as the De- partment of Defense Executive Agent for Space.1 (Added Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title IX, § 911(a)(1), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1563; amended Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title IX, § 911(a)(1)–(3), Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2428, 2429; Pub. L. 111–383, div. A, title IX, § 901(j)(2), Jan. 7, 2011, 124 Stat. 4324; Pub. L. 114–92, div. A, title XVI, § 1604, Nov. 25, 2015, 129 Stat. 1098; Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title IX, § 902(28), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1546.) Editorial Notes PRIOR PROVISIONS A prior section 2272, act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 124, related to contracts to obtain designs sub- mitted in design competitions, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title VIII, § 821(a)(1), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1704. AMENDMENTS 2019—Pub. L. 116–92 substituted ‘‘Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering’’ for ‘‘Assistant Secretary of Defense f

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 10 U.S.C. § 2273

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.

Original supplied file — preserved unchanged

Download original Markdown file

File SHA-256: a05e16ecc06ce3ef12c6d560e90d7228e5f6eb3068a01c34fa9e726ee7a9bbf6. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.

Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.

Open the recorded source website ↗

Record provenance

Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-d4aaed5315400147830c238c
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-10/section-2273-policy-regarding-assured-access-to-space--a03ff28c02.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: e661f5489ce8edb86ea6bd639bb816cf4492a6e89b42688c1a80f4c8bb960d38

Source location: USCODE-2024-title10-subtitleA-partIV-chap135-sec2273.pdf

Stored source content

Page 1845 TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES § 2273 1 See Transfer of Functions note below. Editorial Notes PRIOR PROVISIONS Provisions similar to those in this section were con- tained in Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title XVI, § 1612, Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1729, which was set out in a note under section 2271 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 118–159, div. A, title XVI, § 1601(b), Dec. 23, 2024, 138 Stat. 2158. § 2272. Space science and technology strategy: co- ordination The Secretary of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence shall jointly develop and implement a space science and technology strat- egy and shall review and, as appropriate, revise the strategy biennially. Functions of the Sec- retary under this section shall be carried out jointly by the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering and the official of the Department of Defense designated as the De- partment of Defense Executive Agent for Space.1 (Added Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title IX, § 911(a)(1), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1563; amended Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title IX, § 911(a)(1)–(3), Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2428, 2429; Pub. L. 111–383, div. A, title IX, § 901(j)(2), Jan. 7, 2011, 124 Stat. 4324; Pub. L. 114–92, div. A, title XVI, § 1604, Nov. 25, 2015, 129 Stat. 1098; Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title IX, § 902(28), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1546.) Editorial Notes PRIOR PROVISIONS A prior section 2272, act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 124, related to contracts to obtain designs sub- mitted in design competitions, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title VIII, § 821(a)(1), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1704. AMENDMENTS 2019—Pub. L. 116–92 substituted ‘‘Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering’’ for ‘‘Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering’’. 2015—Pub. L. 114–92 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section consisted of subsecs. (a) to (c) relating to space science and technology strategy, re- quired coordination, and definitions. 2011—Subsecs. (a), (b). Pub. L. 111–383 substituted ‘‘Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engi- neering’’ for ‘‘Director of Defense Research and Engi- neering’’ wherever appearing. 2009—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 111–84, § 911(a)(1), sub- stituted ‘‘The Secretary of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence shall jointly develop’’ for ‘‘The Secretary of Defense shall develop’’. Subsec. (a)(2)(D). Pub. L. 111–84, § 911(a)(2), added sub- par. (D). Subsec. (a)(5). Pub. L. 111–84, § 911(a)(3), amended par. (5) generally. Prior to amendment, par. (5) read as fol- lows: ‘‘The strategy shall be available for review by the congressional defense committees.’’ Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2011 AMENDMENT Amendment by Pub. L. 111–383 effective Jan. 1, 2011, see section 901(p) of Pub. L. 111–383, set out as a note under section 131 of this title. TRANSFER OF FUNCTIONS For termination and transfer of functions of the De- partment of Defense Executive Agent for Space, see section 1601(b)(1) of Pub. L. 115–91, set out as a Termi- nation of Certain Positions and Entities note under former section 2279a of this title. INITIAL REPORT Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title IX, § 911(a)(4), Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2429, required the first space science and tech- nology strategy required to be submitted under former 10 U.S.C. 2272(a)(5) to be submitted on the date on which the President submitted to Congress the budget for fiscal year 2012 under 31 U.S.C. 1105. § 2273. Policy regarding assured access to space: national security payloads (a) POLICY.—It is the policy of the United States for the President to undertake actions appropriate to ensure, to the maximum extent practicable, that the United States has the ca- pabilities necessary to launch and insert United States national security payloads into space whenever such payloads are needed in space. (b) INCLUDED ACTIONS.—The appropriate ac- tions referred to in subsection (a) shall include, at a minimum, providing resources and policy guidance to sustain— (1) the availability of at least two space launch vehicles (or families of space launch vehicles) capable of delivering into space any payload designated by the Secretary of De- fense or the Director of National Intelligence as a national security payload; (2) a robust space launch infrastructure and industrial base; and (3) the availability of rapid, responsive, and reliable space launches for national security space programs to— (A) improve the responsiveness and flexi- bility of a national security space system; (B) lower the costs of launching a national security space system; and (C) maintain risks of mission success at acceptable levels. (c) COORDINATION.—The Secretary of Defense shall, to the maximum extent practicable, pur- sue the attainment of the capabilities described in subsection (a) in coordination with the Ad- ministrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the Director of Na- tional Intelligence. (Added Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title IX, § 912(a)(1), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1565; Pub. L. 110–181, div. A, title IX, § 931(a)(12), Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 285; Pub. L. 110–417, [div. A], title IX, § 932(a)(11), Oct. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 4576; Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title X, § 1073(c)(10), Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2475; Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title XVI, § 1603(a), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 2105; Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title XVII, § 1731(a)(34), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1814.) Editorial Notes PRIOR PROVISIONS A prior section 2273, acts Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 125; Apr. 2, 1982, Pub. L. 97–164, title I, § 160(a)(4), 96 Stat. 48; Oct. 29, 1992, Pub. L. 102–572, title IX, § 902(b)(1), 106 Stat. 4516, related to right of United States to designs, rights of designers to patents, and rights to sue United States, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title VIII, § 821(a)(1), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1704. AMENDMENTS 2019—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 116–92 inserted semicolon at end. Page 1846 TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES § 2273 2018—Subsec. (b)(3). Pub. L. 115–232, § 1603(a)(1), added par. (3). Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 115–232, § 1603(a)(2), inserted ‘‘and the Director of National Intelligence’’ before period at end. 2009—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 111–84 repealed Pub. L. 110–417, § 932(a)(11). See 2008 Amendment note below. 2008—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 110–181 and Pub. L. 110–417, § 932(a)(11), amended par. (1) identically, sub- stituting ‘‘Director of National Intelligence’’ for ‘‘Di- rector of Central Intelligence’’. Pub. L. 110–417, § 932(a)(11), was repealed by Pub. L. 111–84. Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2009 AMENDMENT Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title X, § 1073(c), Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2474, provided that the amendment made by section 1073(c)(10) is effective as of Oct. 14, 2008, and as if included in Pub. L. 110–417 as enacted. NATIONAL SECURITY SPACE LAUNCH PROGRAM Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVI, § 1606, Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4044, provided that: ‘‘(a) LAUNCH SERVICES AGREEMENT.— ‘‘(1) LIMITATION ON AMOUNTS.—Except as provided by paragraph (2), in carrying out the phase two acqui- sition strategy, the Secretary of the Air Force may not obligate or expend a total amount for a launch services agreement that is greater than the amount specifically appropriated for the launch services agreement. ‘‘(2) USE OF REPROGRAMMING AND TRANSFER AUTHOR- ITY.—The Secretary may exceed the limitation under paragraph (1) if the Secretary carries out a re- programming or transfer for such purpose in accord- ance with established procedures for reprogrammings or transfers, including with respect to presenting a request for a reprogramming of funds. ‘‘(b) REUSABILITY.— ‘‘(1) VALIDATION.—Not later than 18 months after the date on which the Secretary determines the down-selected National Security Space Launch pro- viders, the Secretary shall— ‘‘(A) complete all non-recurring design validation of previously flown launch hardware for National Security Space Launch providers offering such hardware for use in phase two contracts; and ‘‘(B) notify the appropriate congressional com- mittees that such design validation has been com- pleted. ‘‘(2) REPORT.—Not later than 210 days after the date on which the Secretary determines the down-selected National Security Space Launch providers, the Sec- retary shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the progress of the Secretary with respect to completing all non-recurring design validation of previously flown launch hardware de- scribed in paragraph (1), including— ‘‘(A) a justification for any deviation from the new entrant certification guide; and ‘‘(B) a description of such progress with respect to National Security Space Launch providers that are not down-selected National Security Space Launch providers, if applicable. ‘‘(c) FUNDING AND STRATEGY FOR TECHNOLOGY DEVEL- OPMENT FOR CERTIFICATION, INFRASTRUCTURE, AND INNO- VATION.— ‘‘(1) AUTHORITY.—Pursuant to section 2371b of title 10, United States Code [now 10 U.S.C. 4022], not later than September 30, 2021, the Secretary of the Air Force shall enter into agreements described in para- graph (3) with potential phase three National Secu- rity Space Launch providers— ‘‘(A) to maintain competition in order to maxi- mize the likelihood of at least three National Secu- rity Space Launch providers competing for phase three contracts; and ‘‘(B) to support innovation for national security launches, including innovative technologies and systems to further advance launch capability asso- ciated with the insertion of national security pay- loads into relevant classes of orbits. ‘‘(2) COMPETITIVE PROCEDURES.—The Secretary shall carry out paragraph (1) by conducting a full and open competition among all National Security Space Launch providers that plan to submit bids for a phase three contract. ‘‘(3) AGREEMENTS.—An agreement described in this paragraph is an agreement that could provide value or technical advances to phase three of the National Security Space Launch program and that includes not more than $90,000,000 in fiscal year 2021, subject to the availability of appropriations for such purpose, for the provider to conduct either or both of the fol- lowing activities: ‘‘(A) Develop enabling technologies to meet the certification and infrastructure requirements that are— ‘‘(i) unique to national security space missions; and ‘‘(ii) support the likely requirements of a phase three contract. ‘‘(B) Develop transformational technologies in support of the national security space launch capa- bility for phase three contracts (such as tech- nologies regarding launch, maneuver, and transport capabilities for enhanced resiliency and security technologies, technologies to support progress to- ward phase three national security space launches, or technologies to inform the National Security Launch Architecture study of the Space Force). ‘‘(4) TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENT STRAT- EGY.—Not later than March 15, 2021, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congressional com- mittees a strategy to support investments in tech- nologies for phase three pursuant to paragraph (1) that includes— ‘‘(A) the funding requirements for such strategy during fiscal years 2022 through 2026; ‘‘(B) a schedule for investments toward phase three; ‘‘(C) associated milestones; and ‘‘(D) a planned schedule for awarding phase three contracts. ‘‘(5) REPORT.—Not later than 30 days after the date on which the Secretary enters into an agreement under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report explaining which enabling technologies are funded under such agreement. ‘‘(d) BRIEFING.—Not later than March 15, 2021, and quarterly thereafter through September 30, 2023, the Secretary shall provide to the congressional defense committees [Committees on Armed Services and Ap- propriations of the Senate and the House of Represent- atives] a briefing on the progress made by the Sec- retary in ensuring that full and open competition ex- ists for phase three contracts, including— ‘‘(1) a description of progress made to establish the requirements for phase three contracts, including such requirements that the Secretary determines cannot be met by the commercial market; ‘‘(2) whether the Secretary determines that addi- tional development funding will be necessary for such phase; ‘‘(3) a description of the estimated costs for the de- velopment described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of subsection (c)(3); and ‘‘(4) how the Secretary will— ‘‘(A) ensure full and open competition for tech- nology development for phase three contracts; and ‘‘(B) maintain competition. ‘‘(e) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section may be construed to delay the award of phase two con- tracts. ‘‘(f) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: ‘‘(1) The term ‘appropriate congressional commit- tees’ means— ‘‘(A) the congressional defense committees; and Page 1847 TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES § 2273 ‘‘(B) the Permanent Select Committee on Intel- ligence of the House of Representatives and the Se- lect Committee on Intelligence of the Senate. ‘‘(2) The term ‘down-selected National Security Space Launch provider’ means a National Security Space Launch provider that the Secretary of the Air Force selected to be awarded phase two contracts. ‘‘(3) The term ‘phase three contract’ means a con- tract awarded using competitive procedures for launch services under the National Security Space Launch program after fiscal year 2024. ‘‘(4) The term ‘phase two acquisition strategy’ means the process by which the Secretary of the Air Force enters into phase two contracts during fiscal year 2020, orders launch missions during fiscal years 2020 through 2024, and carries out such launches under the National Security Space Launch program. ‘‘(5) The term ‘phase two contract’ means a con- tract awarded during fiscal year 2020 using competi- tive procedures for launch missions ordered under the National Security Space Launch program during fis- cal years 2020 through 2024.’’ POLICY TO ENSURE LAUNCH OF SMALL-CLASS PAYLOADS Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVI, § 1608, Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4047, provided that: ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall es- tablish a small launch and satellite policy to ensure re- sponsive and reliable access to space through the proc- essing and launch of Department of Defense small-class payloads. ‘‘(b) POLICY.—The policy under subsection (a) shall include, at a minimum, providing resources and policy guidance to sustain— ‘‘(1) the availability of small-class payload launch service providers using launch vehicles capable of de- livering into space small payloads designated by the Secretary of Defense as a national security payload; ‘‘(2) a robust small-class payload space launch in- frastructure and industrial base, including small launch systems and small satellite rideshare opportu- nities; ‘‘(3) the availability of rapid, responsive, and reli- able space launches for national security space pro- grams to— ‘‘(A) improve the responsiveness and flexibility of a national security space system; ‘‘(B) lower the costs of launching a national secu- rity space system; and ‘‘(C) maintain risks to mission success at accept- able levels; ‘‘(4) a minimum number of dedicated launches each year; and ‘‘(5) full and open competition, including small launch providers and rideshare opportunities.’’ PROGRAM TO ENHANCE AND IMPROVE LAUNCH SUPPORT AND INFRASTRUCTURE Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title XVI, § 1609, Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1727, provided that: ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—In support of the policy described in section 2273(a) of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Admin- istrator of the Federal Aviation Administration, may carry out a program to enhance infrastructure and im- prove support activities for the processing and launch of Department of Defense small-class and medium-class payloads. ‘‘(b) PROGRAM.—The program under subsection (a) shall include improvements to operations at launch ranges and Federal Aviation Administration-licensed spaceports that are consistent with, and necessary to permit, the use of such launch ranges and spaceports by the Department. ‘‘(c) CONSULTATION.—In carrying out the program under subsection (a), the Secretary may consult with current and anticipated users of launch ranges and Fed- eral Aviation Administration-licensed spaceports, in- cluding the Space Rapid Capabilities Office. ‘‘(d) COOPERATION.—In carrying out the program under subsection (a), the Secretary may enter into a contract or agreement under section 2276 of title 10, United States Code. ‘‘(e) REPORT.—Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 20, 2019], the Sec- retary shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report describing a plan for the program under subsection (a). ‘‘(f) APPROPRIATE COMMITTEES OF CONGRESS DE- FINED.—In this section, the term ‘appropriate commit- tees of Congress’ means— ‘‘(1) the congressional defense committees [Com- mittees on Armed Services and Appropriations of the Senate and the House of Representatives]; ‘‘(2) the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and the Select Committee on Intel- ligence of the Senate; and ‘‘(3) the Committee on Transportation and Infra- structure, the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.’’ USE OF REUSABLE LAUNCH VEHICLES Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title XVI, § 1603, Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 2105, provided that: ‘‘(a) ASSURED ACCESS TO SPACE.—[Amended this sec- tion.] ‘‘(b) REUSABILITY OF LAUNCH VEHICLES.— ‘‘(1) DESIGNATION.—Effective March 1, 2019, the Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle program of the Department of Defense shall be known as the ‘Na- tional Security Space Launch program’. Any ref- erence in Federal law, regulations, guidance, instruc- tions, or other documents of the Federal Government to the Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle program shall be deemed to be a reference to the National Se- curity Space Launch program. ‘‘(2) REQUIREMENT.—In carrying out the National Security Space Launch program, the Secretary of De- fense shall provide for consideration of both reusable and expendable launch vehicles with respect to any solicitation occurring on or after March 1, 2019, for which the use of a reusable launch vehicle is tech- nically capable and maintains risk at acceptable lev- els. ‘‘(3) NOTIFICATION OF SOLICITATIONS FOR NON-REUS- ABLE LAUNCH VEHICLES.—Beginning March 1, 2019, if the Secretary proposes to issue a solicitation for a contract for space launch services for which the use of reusable launch vehicles is not eligible for the award of the contract, the Secretary shall notify in writing the appropriate congressional committees of such proposed solicitation, including justifications for such ineligibility, by not later than 10 days after issuing such solicitation. ‘‘(c) RISK AND COST IMPACT ANALYSIS.— ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall conduct a risk and cost impact analysis with respect to launch services that use reusable launch vehicles. Such anal- ysis shall include— ‘‘(A) an assessment of how the inspection and cer- tification regime of the Air Force for previously flown launch vehicles will ensure increased respon- siveness and operational flexibility while maintain- ing acceptable risk; and ‘‘(B) an assessment of the anticipated cost sav- ings to the Department of Defense realized by using a previously flown launch vehicle or components. ‘‘(2) SUBMISSION.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [Aug. 13, 2018], the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congres- sional committees the analysis conducted under paragraph (1). ‘‘(d) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DE- FINED.—In this section, the term ‘appropriate congres- sional committees’ means the following: ‘‘(1) The congressional defense committees [Com- mittees on Armed Services and Appropriations of the Senate and the House of Representatives]. Page 1848 TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES § 2273 ‘‘(2) The Permanent Select Committee on Intel- ligence of the House of Representatives and the Se- lect Committee on Intelligence of the Senate.’’ LAUNCH SUPPORT AND INFRASTRUCTURE MODERNIZATION Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title XVI, § 1609, Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1727, as amended by Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title XVII, § 1731(c), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1816, provided that: ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—In support of the policy specified in section 2273 of title 10, United States Code, the Sec- retary of Defense shall carry out a program to mod- ernize infrastructure and improve support activities for the processing and launch of United States national se- curity space vehicles launching from Federal ranges. ‘‘(b) ELEMENTS.—The program under subsection (a) shall include— ‘‘(1) investments in infrastructure to improve oper- ations at the Eastern and Western Ranges that may benefit all users, to enhance the overall capabilities of ranges, to improve safety, and to reduce the long- term cost of operations and maintenance; ‘‘(2) measures to normalize processes, systems, and products across the Eastern and Western ranges to minimize the burden on launch providers; and ‘‘(3) improvements in transparency, flexibility, and responsiveness for launch scheduling. ‘‘(c) CONSULTATION.—In carrying out the program under subsection (a), the Secretary may consult with current and anticipated users of the Eastern and West- ern Ranges. ‘‘(d) COOPERATION.—In carrying out the program under subsection (a), the Secretary may consider part- nerships authorized under section 2276 of title 10, United States Code. ‘‘(e) REPORT.— ‘‘(1) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 12, 2017], the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees [Committees on Armed Services and Appropriations of the Senate and the House of Representatives] a report on the plan for the imple- mentation of the program under subsection (a). ‘‘(2) ELEMENTS.—The report under paragraph (1) shall include— ‘‘(A) a description of plans and the resources needed to improve launch support infrastructure, utilities, support equipment, and range operations; ‘‘(B) a description of plans to streamline and nor- malize processes, systems, and products at the Eastern and Western ranges, to ensure consistency for range users; and ‘‘(C) recommendations for improving trans- parency, flexibility, and responsiveness in launch scheduling.’’ [Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title XVII, § 1731(c), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1816, provided that the amendment made by section 1731(c) to section 1609(b)(3) of Pub. L. 115–91, set out above, is effective as of Dec. 12, 2017, and as if included in Pub. L. 115–91 as enacted.] ACQUISITION STRATEGY FOR NATIONAL SECURITY SPACE LAUNCH PROGRAM Pub. L. 114–92, div. A, title XVI, § 1608, Nov. 25, 2015, 129 Stat. 1100, as amended by Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, § 1831(j)(1), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4216, pro- vided that: ‘‘(a) TREATMENT OF CERTAIN ARRANGEMENT.— ‘‘(1) DISCONTINUATION.—The Secretary of the Air Force shall discontinue the evolved expendable launch vehicle launch capability arrangement, as structured as of the date of the enactment of this Act [Nov. 25, 2015], for— ‘‘(A) existing contracts using rocket engines de- signed or manufactured in the Russian Federation by not later than December 31, 2019; and ‘‘(B) existing contracts using domestic rocket en- gines by not later than December 31, 2020. ‘‘(2) WAIVER.—The Secretary may waive paragraph (1) if the Secretary— ‘‘(A) determines that such waiver is necessary for the national security interests of the United States; ‘‘(B) notifies the congressional defense commit- tees [Committees on Armed Services and Appro- priations of the Senate and the House of Represent- atives] of such waiver; and ‘‘(C) a period of 90 days has elapsed following the date of such notification. ‘‘(b) CONSISTENT STANDARDS.—In accordance with chapter 271 of title 10, United States Code, the Sec- retary shall— ‘‘(1) apply consistent and appropriate standards to certified evolved expendable launch vehicle providers with respect to certified cost and pricing data; and ‘‘(2) conduct the appropriate audits. ‘‘(c) ACQUISITION STRATEGY.—In accordance with sub- sections (a) and (b) and section 2273 of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary shall develop and carry out a 10-year phased acquisition strategy, including near and long term, for the evolved expendable launch vehi- cle program [now the National Security Space Launch program]. ‘‘(d) ELEMENTS.—The acquisition strategy under sub- section (c) for the evolved expendable launch vehicle program [now the National Security Space Launch pro- gram] shall— ‘‘(1) provide the necessary— ‘‘(A) stability in budgeting and acquisition of ca- pabilities; ‘‘(B) flexibility to the Federal Government; and ‘‘(C) procedures for fair competition; and ‘‘(2) specifically take into account, as appropriate per competition, the effect of— ‘‘(A) contracts or agreements for launch services or launch capability entered into by the Depart- ment of Defense and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration with certified evolved ex- pendable launch vehicle providers; ‘‘(B) the requirements of the Department of De- fense, including with respect to launch capabilities and pricing data, that are met by such providers; ‘‘(C) the cost of integrating a satellite onto a launch vehicle; and ‘‘(D) any other matters the Secretary considers appropriate. ‘‘(e) COMPETITION.—In awarding any contract for launch services in a national security space mission pursuant to a competitive acquisition, the evaluation shall account for the value of the evolved expendable launch vehicle launch capability arrangement per con- tract line item numbers in the bid price of the offeror as appropriate per launch. ‘‘(f) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall sub- mit to the congressional defense committees, the Per- manent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives, and the Select Committee on Intel- ligence of the Senate a report on the acquisition strat- egy developed under subsection (c).’’ ROCKET PROPULSION SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title XVI, § 1604, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3623, as amended by Pub. L. 114–92, div. A, title XVI, § 1606(a), Nov. 25, 2015, 129 Stat. 1099; Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title XVI, § 1603, Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2582, provided that: ‘‘(a) DEVELOPMENT.— ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall develop a next-generation rocket propulsion system that enables the effective, efficient, and expedient transition from the use of non-allied space launch en- gines to a domestic alternative for national security space launches. ‘‘(2) REQUIREMENTS.—The system developed under paragraph (1) shall— ‘‘(A) be made in the United States; ‘‘(B) meet the requirements of the national secu- rity space community; ‘‘(C) be developed by not later than 2019; Page 1849 TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES § 2273a ‘‘(D) be developed using full and open competi- tion; and ‘‘(E) be available for purchase by all space launch providers of the United States. ‘‘(b) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 19, 2014], the Sec- retary shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that includes— ‘‘(1) a plan to carry out the development of the rocket propulsion system under subsection (a), in- cluding an analysis of the benefits of using public-pri- vate partnerships; ‘‘(2) the requirements of the program to develop such system; and ‘‘(3) the estimated cost of such system. ‘‘(c) STREAMLINED ACQUISITION.—In developing the rocket propulsion system required under subsection (a), the Secretary shall— ‘‘(1) use a streamlined acquisition approach, includ- ing tailored documentation and review processes, that enables the effective, efficient, and expedient transition from the use of non-allied space launch en- gines to a domestic alternative for national security space launches; and ‘‘(2) prior to establishing such acquisition approach, establish well-defined requirements with a clear ac- quisition strategy. ‘‘(d) USE OF FUNDS UNDER DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM.— ‘‘(1) DEVELOPMENT OF ROCKET PROPULSION SYSTEM.— The funds described in paragraph (2)— ‘‘(A) may be obligated or expended for— ‘‘(i) the development of the rocket propulsion system to replace non-allied space launch engines pursuant to subsection (a); and ‘‘(ii) the necessary interfaces to, or integration of, the rocket propulsion system with an existing or new launch vehicle; and ‘‘(B) except as provided by paragraph (3), may not be obligated or expended to develop or procure a launch vehicle, an upper stage, a strap-on motor, or related infrastructure. ‘‘(2) FUNDS DESCRIBED.—The funds described in this paragraph are the following: ‘‘(A) Funds authorized to be appropriated by the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 [Pub. L. 114–328, see Tables for classification] or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2017 for the Department of Defense for the development of the rocket propulsion system under subsection (a). ‘‘(B) Funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act [see Tables for classification] or the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 [Pub. L. 114–92, see Tables for classification] or oth- erwise made available for fiscal years 2015 or 2016 for the Department of Defense for the development of the rocket propulsion system under subsection (a) that are unobligated as of the date of the enact- ment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 [Dec. 23, 2016]. ‘‘(3) OTHER PURPOSES.—The Secretary may obligate or expend not more than a total of the amount cal- culated under paragraph (4) of the funds that are au- thorized to be appropriated by the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2017 for the rocket pro- pulsion system and launch system investment for ac- tivities not authorized by paragraph (1)(A), including for developing a launch vehicle, an upper stage, a strap-on motor, or related infrastructure. The Sec- retary may exceed such limit calculated under para- graph (4) in fiscal year 2017 for such purposes if— ‘‘(A) the Secretary certifies to the appropriate congressional committees that, as of the date of the certification— ‘‘(i) the development of the rocket propulsion system is being carried out pursuant to paragraph (1)(A) in a manner that ensures that the rocket propulsion system will meet each requirement under subsection (a)(2); and ‘‘(ii) such obligation or expenditure will not negatively affect the development of the rocket propulsion system, including with respect to meeting such requirements; and ‘‘(B) the reprogramming or transfer is carried out in accordance with established procedures for re- programming or transfers, including with respect to presenting a request for a reprogramming of funds. ‘‘(4) CALCULATION OF AMOUNTS FOR OTHER PUR- POSES.—In carrying out paragraph (3), the Secretary shall calculate the amount of the funds specified in such paragraph as follows: ‘‘(A) If the total amount of funds that are author- ized to be appropriated by the National Defense Au- thorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2017 for the rocket propulsion system and launch system investment is equal to or less than $320,000,000, such amount shall equal 31 percent. ‘‘(B) If the total amount of funds that are author- ized to be appropriated by the National Defense Au- thorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2017 for the rocket propulsion system and launch system investment is greater than $320,000,000, such amount shall equal the difference of— ‘‘(i) the amount of funds so authorized to be ap- propriated, minus ‘‘(ii) $220,000,000. ‘‘(e) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: ‘‘(1) The term ‘appropriate congressional commit- tees’ means— ‘‘(A) the congressional defense committees [Com- mittees on Armed Services and Appropriations of the Senate and the House of Representatives]; and ‘‘(B) the Permanent Select Committee on Intel- ligence of the House of Representatives and the Se- lect Committee on Intelligence of the Senate. ‘‘(2) The term ‘rocket propulsion system’ means, with respect to the development authorized by sub- section (a), a main booster, first-stage rocket engine or motor. The term does not include a launch vehicle, an upper stage, a strap-on motor, or related infra- structure.’’ § 2273a. Space Rapid Capabilities Office (a) IN GENERAL.—There is within the Space Force a program office known as the Space Rapid Capabilities Office (in this section re- ferred to as the ‘‘Office’’). The facilities of the Office may not be co-located with the head- quarters facilities of the Air Force Space and Missile Systems Center. (b) HEAD OF OFFICE.—The head of the Office shall be the designee of the Secretary of the Air Force. The head of the Office shall report to the Chief of Space Operations. (c) MISSION.—The mission of the Office shall be— (1) to contribute to the development of low- cost, rapid reaction payloads, busses, launch, and launch control capabilities in order to ful- fill joint military operational requirements for on-demand space support and reconstitu- tion; (2) to coordinate and execute space rapid ca- pabilities efforts across the Department of De- fense with respect to planning, acquisition, and operations; and (3) to rapidly develop and field new classified space capabilities. (d) ACQUISITION AUTHORITY.—The acquisition activities of the Office shall be subject to the following: (1) The Secretary of the Air Force shall des- ignate the acquisition executive of the Office

Cross-references

Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

10 U.S.C. § 2272 — Space science and technology strategy: coordination

The Secretary of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence shall jointly develop and implement a space science and technology strategy and shall review and, as appropriate, revise the strategy biennially. Functions of the Secretary under this section shall be carried out jointly by the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering and the official of the Department of Defense designated as the Department of Defense Executive Agent for Space.11 See Transfer of Functions note below.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 2272

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 10 U.S.C. § 2272. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

10 U.S.C. § 2272 — Space science and technology strategy: co-

Page 1845 TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES § 2273 1 See Transfer of Functions note below. Editorial Notes PRIOR PROVISIONS Provisions similar to those in this section were con- tained in Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title XVI, § 1612, Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1729, which was set out in a note under section 2271 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 118–159, div. A, title XVI, § 1601(b), Dec. 23, 2024, 138 Stat. 2158. § 2272. Space science and technology strategy: co- ordination The Secretary of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence shall jointly develop and implement a space science and technology strat- egy and shall review and, as appropriate, revise the strategy biennially. Functions of the Sec- retary under this section shall be carried out jointly by the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering and the official of the Department of Defense designated as the De- partment of Defense Executive Agent for Space.1 (Added Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title IX, § 911(a)(1), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1563; amended Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title IX, § 911(a)(1)–(3), Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2428, 2429; Pub. L. 111–383, div. A, title IX, § 901(j)(2), Jan. 7, 2011, 124 Stat. 4324; Pub. L. 114–92, div. A, title XVI, § 1604, Nov. 25, 2015, 129 Stat. 1098; Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title IX, § 902(28), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1546.) Editorial Notes PRIOR PROVISIONS A prior section 2272, act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 124, related to contracts to obtain designs sub- mitted in design competitions, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title VIII, § 821(a)(1), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1704. AMENDMENTS 2019—Pub. L. 116–92 substituted ‘‘Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering’’ for ‘‘Assistant Secretary of Defense f

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 10 U.S.C. § 2272

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 10 U.S.C. § 2272. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

10 U.S.C. § 2273 — Policy regarding assured access to space: national security payloads

**(a) Policy.—** It is the policy of the United States for the President to undertake actions appropriate to ensure, to the maximum extent practicable, that the United States has the capabilities necessary to launch and insert United States national security payloads into space whenever such payloads are needed in space. **(b) Included Actions.—** The appropriate actions referred to in subsection (a) shall include, at a minimum, providing resources and policy guidance to sustain— (1) the availability of at least two space launch vehicles (or families of space launch vehicles) capable of delivering into space any payload designated by the Secretary of Defense or the Director of National Intelligence as a national security payload; (2) a robust space launch infrastructure and industrial base; and (3) the availability of rapid, responsive, and reliable space launches for national security space programs to— (A) improve the responsiveness and flexibility of a national security space system; (B) lower the costs of launching a national security space system; and (C) maintain risks of mission success at acceptable levels. **(c) Coordination.—** The Secretary of Defense shall, to the maximum extent practicable, pursue the attainment of the capabilities described in subsection (a) in coordination with the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the Director of National Intelligence.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 2273

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

10 U.S.C. § 4022 — Authority of the Department of Defense to carry out certain prototype projects

**(a) Authority.—** (1) Subject to paragraph (2), the Director of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, the Director of the Defense Innovation Unit, the Secretary of a military department, or any other official designated by the Secretary of Defense may, under the authority of [section 4021 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title10-section4021&num=0&edition=prelim), carry out prototype projects that are directly relevant to enhancing the mission effectiveness of personnel of the Department of Defense or improving platforms, systems, components, or materials proposed to be acquired or developed by the Department of Defense, or to improvement of platforms, systems, components, or materials in use by the armed forces. (2) The authority of this section— (A) may be exercised for a transaction for a prototype project that is expected to cost the Department of Defense in excess of $100,000,000 but not in excess of $500,000,000 (including all options) only upon a written determination by the head of the contracting activity, or, for the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, the Defense Innovation Unit, or the Missile Defense Agency, the director of the agency that— (i) the requirements of subsection (d) will be met; and (ii) the use of the authority of this section is essential to promoting the success of the prototype project; (B) may be exercised for a transaction for a prototype project that is expected to cost the Department of Defense in excess of $500,000,000 (including all options) only if— (i) the senior procurement executive for the agency as designated for the purpose of [section 1702(c) of title 41](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title41-section1702/c&num=0&ed

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 4022

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 10 U.S.C. § 4022. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

10 U.S.C. § 4022 — Authority of the Department of Defense to

Page 2624 TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES § 4022 Services and Appropriations of the Senate and the House of Representatives] a report on the use of other transaction authority to carry out prototype projects during the preceding fiscal year. Each report shall summarize the data collected under subsection (a) on the nature and extent of each such use of the author- ity, including a description— ‘‘(A) of the participants to an agreement entered into pursuant to the authority of subsection (a) of section 2371b of title 10, United States Code [now 10 U.S.C. 4022], or a follow-on contract or transaction entered into pursuant to the authority of sub- section (f) of such section; ‘‘(B) of the quantity of prototype projects to be produced pursuant to such an agreement, follow-on contract, or transaction; ‘‘(C) of the amount of payments made pursuant to each such agreement, follow-on contract, or trans- action; ‘‘(D) of the purpose, description, and status of prototype projects carried out pursuant to each such agreement, follow-on contract, or transaction; and ‘‘(E) including case examples, of the successes and challenges with using the authority of such sub- section (a) or (f). ‘‘(2) FORM OF REPORT.—A report required under this subsection shall be submitted in unclassified form without any designation relating to dissemination control, but may contain a classified annex.’’ PREFERENCE FOR USE OF OTHER TRANSACTIONS AND EXPERIMENTAL AUTHORITY Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title VIII, § 867, Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1495, provided that: ‘‘In the execution of science and technology and prototyping programs, the Sec- retary of Defense shall establish a preference, to be ap- plied in circumstances determined appropriate by the Secretary, for using transactions other than

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 10 U.S.C. § 4022

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 10 U.S.C. § 4022. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

31 U.S.C. § 1105 — Budget contents and submission to Congress

**(a)** On or after the first Monday in January but not later than the first Monday in February of each year, the President shall submit a budget of the United States Government for the following fiscal year. Each budget shall include a budget message and summary and supporting information. The President shall include in each budget the following: (1) information on activities and functions of the Government. (2) when practicable, information on costs and achievements of Government programs. (3) other desirable classifications of information. (4) a reconciliation of the summary information on expenditures with proposed appropriations. (5) except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, estimated expenditures and proposed appropriations the President decides are necessary to support the Government in the fiscal year for which the budget is submitted and the 4 fiscal years after that year. (6) estimated receipts of the Government in the fiscal year for which the budget is submitted and the 4 fiscal years after that year under— (A) laws in effect when the budget is submitted; and (B) proposals in the budget to increase revenues. (7) appropriations, expenditures, and receipts of the Government in the prior fiscal year. (8) estimated expenditures and receipts, and appropriations and proposed appropriations, of the Government for the current fiscal year. (9) balanced statements of the— (A) condition of the Treasury at the end of the prior fiscal year; (B) estimated condition of the Treasury at the end of the current fiscal year; and (C) estimated condition of the Treasury at the end of the fiscal year for which the budget is submitted if financial proposals in the budget are adopted. (10) essential information about the debt of the Government.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 31 U.S.C. § 1105

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 31 U.S.C. § 1105. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

31 U.S.C. § 1105 — Budget contents and submission to Con-

Page 123 TITLE 31—MONEY AND FINANCE § 1105 Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1985 AMENDMENT Amendment by Pub. L. 99–177 effective Dec. 12, 1985, and applicable with respect to fiscal years beginning after Sept. 30, 1985, see section 275(a)(1) of Pub. L. 99–177, formerly set out as an Effective and Termi- nation Dates note under section 900 of Title 2, The Con- gress, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 112–25, title I, § 104(a), Aug. 2, 2011, 125 Stat. 246. Executive Documents EX. ORD. NO. 10253. PROVISIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF WORK OF FEDERAL EXECUTIVE AGENCIES WITH RESPECT TO STATISTICAL INFORMATION Ex. Ord. No. 10253, June 11, 1951, 16 F.R. 5605, as amended by Ex. Ord. No. 12013, Oct. 7, 1977, 42 F.R. 54931; Ex. Ord. No. 12318, Aug. 12, 1981, 46 F.R. 42833, provided: SECTION 1. The Director of the Office of Management and Budget (hereinafter referred to as the Director) shall develop programs, and issue regulations and or- ders, for the improved gathering, compiling, analyzing, publishing, and disseminating of statistical informa- tion for any purpose by the various agencies in the ex- ecutive branch of the Federal Government. SEC. 2. In order to carry out the provisions of Section 1 of this order, the Director shall maintain a con- tinuing study for the improvement of the statistical work of the agencies in the executive branch of the Federal Government with a view to obtaining the max- imum benefit from the funds and facilities available for such work, giving due consideration to the constantly changing character of the various needs for statistical information both within and without the Government and, where the statistical work is primarily concerned with operating programs, giving due consideration to administrative needs

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 31 U.S.C. § 1105

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 31 U.S.C. § 1105. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.