Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
7 U.S.C. § 7253 — Consolidation and reform of Federal milk
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 1983
TITLE 7—AGRICULTURE
§ 7253
204(h)(2) of the Agricultural Act of 1949 (7
U.S.C. 1446e(h)(2)), as in effect on the day be-
fore the amendment made by subsection (g), in
the price of milk received by a producer dur-
ing calendar year 1995 or 1996, if the producer
provides evidence that the producer did not in-
crease marketings in calendar year 1995 or 1996
when compared to calendar year 1994 or 1995,
respectively.
(2) Exception
This subsection shall not apply with respect
to a producer for a particular calendar year if
the producer has already received a refund
under section 204(h) of the Agricultural Act of
1949 for the same fiscal year before the effec-
tive date of this section.
(3) Treatment of refund
A refund under this subsection shall not be
considered as any type of price support or pay-
ment for purposes of sections 3811 and 3821 of
title 16.
(f) Commodity Credit Corporation
The Secretary shall carry out the program au-
thorized by this section through the Commodity
Credit Corporation.
(g) Omitted
(h) Period of effectiveness
This section (other than subsection (g)) shall
be effective only during the period beginning on
the first day of the first month beginning after
April 4, 1996, and ending on May 31, 2002. The
program authorized by this section shall termi-
nate on May 31, 2002, and shall be considered to
have expired notwithstanding section 907 of title
2.
(Pub. L. 104–127, title I, § 141, Apr. 4, 1996, 110
Stat. 914; Pub. L. 106–78, title VIII, § 807(a), Oct.
22, 1999, 113 Stat. 1181; Pub. L. 106–387, § 1(a) [title
VII, § 742(a)], Oct. 28, 2000, 114 Stat. 1549,
1549A–35; Pub. L. 107–76, title VII, § 772(a), Nov.
28, 2001, 115 Stat. 745.)
Editorial Notes
REFERENCES IN TEXT
Section 204 of the Agricultural Act of 194
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 7 U.S.C. § 7253
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: b0f329239d27a6e4a4440e96e46c462b0aff8a17dee4461d735866cda4da71cf. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-c9fdd5663eab02f640e04f12
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-7/section-7253-consolidation-and-reform-of-federal-milk--5ae843eac3.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 10850060d273ba446cd9d490e59abf879c61693110f343bdcac8f381575018da
Source location: USCODE-2024-title7-chap100-subchapIV-partA-sec7253.pdf
Stored source content
Page 1983
TITLE 7—AGRICULTURE
§ 7253
204(h)(2) of the Agricultural Act of 1949 (7
U.S.C. 1446e(h)(2)), as in effect on the day be-
fore the amendment made by subsection (g), in
the price of milk received by a producer dur-
ing calendar year 1995 or 1996, if the producer
provides evidence that the producer did not in-
crease marketings in calendar year 1995 or 1996
when compared to calendar year 1994 or 1995,
respectively.
(2) Exception
This subsection shall not apply with respect
to a producer for a particular calendar year if
the producer has already received a refund
under section 204(h) of the Agricultural Act of
1949 for the same fiscal year before the effec-
tive date of this section.
(3) Treatment of refund
A refund under this subsection shall not be
considered as any type of price support or pay-
ment for purposes of sections 3811 and 3821 of
title 16.
(f) Commodity Credit Corporation
The Secretary shall carry out the program au-
thorized by this section through the Commodity
Credit Corporation.
(g) Omitted
(h) Period of effectiveness
This section (other than subsection (g)) shall
be effective only during the period beginning on
the first day of the first month beginning after
April 4, 1996, and ending on May 31, 2002. The
program authorized by this section shall termi-
nate on May 31, 2002, and shall be considered to
have expired notwithstanding section 907 of title
2.
(Pub. L. 104–127, title I, § 141, Apr. 4, 1996, 110
Stat. 914; Pub. L. 106–78, title VIII, § 807(a), Oct.
22, 1999, 113 Stat. 1181; Pub. L. 106–387, § 1(a) [title
VII, § 742(a)], Oct. 28, 2000, 114 Stat. 1549,
1549A–35; Pub. L. 107–76, title VII, § 772(a), Nov.
28, 2001, 115 Stat. 745.)
Editorial Notes
REFERENCES IN TEXT
Section 204 of the Agricultural Act of 1949, referred to
in subsec. (e)(1), (2), was classified to section 1446e of
this title prior to repeal by subsec. (g) of this section.
See Codification note below.
CODIFICATION
Section is comprised of section 141 of Pub. L. 104–127.
Subsec. (g) of section 141 of Pub. L. 104–127 repealed sec-
tion 1446e of this title and enacted provisions set out as
a note under section 1446e of this title.
AMENDMENTS
2001—Subsec. (b)(5). Pub. L. 107–76, § 772(a)(1), added
par. (5).
Subsec. (h). Pub. L. 107–76, § 772(a)(2), substituted
‘‘May 31, 2002’’ for ‘‘December 31, 2001’’ in two places.
2000—Subsec. (b)(4). Pub. L. 106–387, § 1(a) [title VII,
§ 742(a)(1)], substituted ‘‘through 2001’’ for ‘‘and 2000’’.
Subsec.
(h).
Pub.
L.
106–387,
§ 1(a)
[title
VII,
§ 742(a)(2)], substituted ‘‘2001’’ for ‘‘2000’’ in two places.
1999—Subsec. (b)(4). Pub. L. 106–78, § 807(a)(1), sub-
stituted ‘‘each of calendar years 1999 and 2000’’ for ‘‘cal-
endar year 1999’’.
Subsec. (h). Pub. L. 106–78, § 807(a)(2), substituted
‘‘2000’’ for ‘‘1999’’ in two places.
§ 7252. Repealed. Pub. L. 107–76, title VII, § 772(b),
Nov. 28, 2001, 115 Stat. 745
Section, Pub. L. 104–127, title I, § 142, Apr. 4, 1996, 110
Stat. 915; Pub. L. 106–78, title VIII, § 807(b), Oct. 22, 1999,
113 Stat. 1181; Pub. L. 106–387, § 1(a) [title VII, § 742(b)],
Oct. 28, 2000, 114 Stat. 1549, 1549A–35, related to recourse
loan program for commercial processors of dairy prod-
ucts.
§ 7253. Consolidation and reform of Federal milk
marketing orders
(a) Amendment of orders
(1) Required consolidation
The Secretary shall amend Federal milk
marketing orders issued under section 608c of
this title to limit the number of Federal milk
marketing orders to not less than 10 and not
more than 14 orders.
(2) Inclusion of California as separate order
Upon the petition and approval of California
dairy producers in the manner provided in sec-
tion 608c of this title, the Secretary shall des-
ignate the State of California as a separate
Federal milk marketing order. The order cov-
ering California shall have the right to reblend
and distribute order receipts to recognize
quota value. Subsection (b) does not apply to
the authority of the Secretary under this sub-
section.
(3) Related issues addressed in consolidation
Among the issues the Secretary is author-
ized to implement as part of the consolidation
of Federal milk marketing orders are the fol-
lowing:
(A) The use of utilization rates and mul-
tiple basing points for the pricing of fluid
milk.
(B) The use of uniform multiple compo-
nent pricing when developing 1 or more basic
formula prices for manufacturing milk.
(4) Effect of existing law
In implementing the consolidation of Fed-
eral milk marketing orders and related re-
forms under this subsection, the Secretary
may not consider, or base any decision on, the
table contained in section 608c(5)(A) of this
title.
(b) Expedited process
(1) Use of informal rulemaking
To implement the consolidation of Federal
milk marketing orders and related reforms
under subsection (a), the Secretary shall use
the notice and comment procedures provided
in section 553 of title 5.
(2) Time limitations
(A) Proposed amendments
The Secretary shall announce the proposed
amendments to be made under subsection (a)
not later than 2 years after April 4, 1996.
(B) Final amendments
The Secretary shall implement the amend-
ments not later than 3 years after April 4,
1996.
(3) Effect of court order
The actions authorized by this subsection
are intended to ensure the timely publication
Page 1984
TITLE 7—AGRICULTURE
§ 7253
and implementation of new and amended Fed-
eral milk marketing orders. In the event that
the Secretary is enjoined or otherwise re-
strained by a court order from publishing or
implementing the consolidation and related
reforms under subsection (a), the length of
time for which that injunction or other re-
straining order is effective shall be added to
the time limitations specified in paragraph (2)
thereby extending those time limitations by a
period of time equal to the period of time for
which the injunction or other restraining
order is effective.
(c) Failure to timely consolidate orders
If the Secretary fails to implement the con-
solidation required under subsection (a)(1) with-
in the time period required under subsection
(b)(2)(B) (plus any additional period provided
under subsection (b)(3)), the Secretary may not
assess or collect assessments from milk pro-
ducers or handlers under such section 608c of
this title for marketing order administration
and services provided under such section after
the end of that period until the consolidation is
completed. The Secretary may not reduce the
level of services provided under the section on
account of the prohibition against assessments,
but shall rather cover the cost of marketing
order administration and services through funds
available for the Agricultural Marketing Serv-
ice of the Department.
(d) Report regarding further reforms
(1) Report required
Not later than April 1, 1997, the Secretary
shall submit to Congress a report—
(A) reviewing the Federal milk marketing
order system established pursuant to section
608c of this title in light of the reforms re-
quired by subsection (a);
(B) describing the efforts underway and
the progress made in implementing the re-
forms required by subsection (a); and
(C) containing such recommendations as
the Secretary considers appropriate for fur-
ther improvements and reforms to the Fed-
eral milk marketing order system.
(2) Effect of other laws
Any limitation imposed by Act of Congress
on the conduct or completion of reports to
Congress shall not apply to the report required
under this section, unless the limitation spe-
cifically refers to this section.
(Pub. L. 104–127, title I, § 143, Apr. 4, 1996, 110
Stat. 915; Pub. L. 113–79, title I, § 1410(d), Feb. 7,
2014, 128 Stat. 693.)
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
2014—Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 113–79 inserted at end
‘‘Subsection (b) does not apply to the authority of the
Secretary under this subsection.’’
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
USE OF OPTION 1A AS PRICE STRUCTURE FOR CLASS I
MILK
UNDER
CONSOLIDATED
FEDERAL
MILK
MAR-
KETING ORDERS
Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, § 1000(a)(8) [§ 1], Nov. 29, 1999,
113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–517, provided that:
‘‘(a) FINAL RULE DEFINED.—In this section, the term
‘final rule’ means the final rule for the consolidation
and reform of Federal milk marketing orders that was
published in the Federal Register on September 1, 1999
(64 Fed. Reg. 47897–48021), to comply with section 143 of
the Federal Agriculture Improvement and Reform Act
of 1996 (7 U.S.C. 7253).
‘‘(b) IMPLEMENTATION OF FINAL RULE FOR MILK ORDER
REFORM.—Subject to subsection (c), the final rule shall
take effect, and be implemented by the Secretary of
Agriculture, on the first day of the first month begin-
ning at least 30 days after the date of the enactment of
this Act [Nov. 29, 1999].
‘‘(c) USE OF OPTION 1A FOR PRICING CLASS I MILK.—In
lieu of the Class I price differentials specified in the
final rule, the Secretary of Agriculture shall price fluid
or Class I milk under the Federal milk marketing or-
ders using the Class I price differentials identified as
Option 1A ‘Location-Specific Differentials Analysis’ in
the proposed rule published in the Federal Register on
January 30, 1998 (63 Fed. Reg. 4802, 4809), except that the
Secretary shall include the corrections and modifica-
tions to such Class I differentials made by the Sec-
retary through April 2, 1999.
‘‘(d) EFFECT
OF PRIOR ANNOUNCEMENT
OF MINIMUM
PRICES.—If the Secretary of Agriculture announces
minimum prices for milk under Federal milk mar-
keting orders pursuant to section 1000.50 of title 7, Code
of Federal Regulations, before the effective date speci-
fied in subsection (b), the minimum prices so an-
nounced before that date shall be the only applicable
minimum prices under Federal milk marketing orders
for the month or months for which the prices have been
announced.
‘‘(e) IMPLEMENTATION
OF REQUIREMENT.—The imple-
mentation of the final rule, as modified by subsection
(c), shall not be subject to any of the following:
‘‘(1) The notice and hearing requirements of section
8c(3) of the Agricultural Adjustment Act (7 U.S.C.
608c(3)), reenacted with amendments by the Agricul-
tural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, or the notice
and comment provisions of section 553 of title 5,
United States Code.
‘‘(2) A referendum conducted by the Secretary of
Agriculture pursuant to subsections (17) or (19) of sec-
tion 8c of the Agricultural Adjustment Act (7 U.S.C.
608c), reenacted with amendments by the Agricul-
tural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937.
‘‘(3) The Statement of Policy of the Secretary of
Agriculture effective July 24, 1971 (36 Fed. Reg. 13804),
relating to notices of proposed rulemaking and public
participation in rulemaking.
‘‘(4) Chapter 35 of title 44, United States Code (com-
monly known as the Paperwork Reduction Act).
‘‘(5) Any decision, restraining order, or injunction
issued by a United States court before the date of the
enactment of this Act [Nov. 29, 1999].’’
FURTHER RULEMAKING TO DEVELOP PRICING METHODS
FOR
CLASS
III AND
CLASS
IV MILK
UNDER
MAR-
KETING ORDERS
Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, § 1000(a)(8) [§ 2], Nov. 29, 1999,
113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–518, provided that:
‘‘(a) CONGRESSIONAL FINDING.—The Class III and Class
IV milk pricing formulas included in the final decision
for the consolidation and reform of Federal milk mar-
keting orders, as published in the Federal Register on
April 2, 1999 (64 Fed. Reg. 16025), do not adequately re-
flect public comment on the original proposed rule pub-
lished in the Federal Register on January 30, 1998 (63
Fed. Reg. 4802), and are sufficiently different from the
proposed rule and any comments submitted with regard
to the proposed rule that further emergency rule-
making is merited.
‘‘(b) RULEMAKING REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Agri-
culture shall conduct rulemaking, on the record after
an opportunity for an agency hearing, to reconsider the
Class III and Class IV milk pricing formulas included in
the final rule for the consolidation and reform of Fed-
eral milk marketing orders that was published in the
Page 1985
TITLE 7—AGRICULTURE
§ 7256
1 See Codification note below.
1 So in original. Probably should be preceded by ‘‘of’’.
Federal Register on September 1, 1999 (64 Fed. Reg.
47897–48021).
‘‘(c) TIME PERIOD FOR RULEMAKING.—On December 1,
2000, the Secretary of Agriculture shall publish in the
Federal Register a final decision on the Class III and
Class IV milk pricing formulas. The resulting formulas
shall take effect, and be implemented by the Secretary,
on January 1, 2001.
‘‘(d) EFFECT OF COURT ORDER.—The actions author-
ized by subsections (b) and (c) are intended to ensure
the timely publication and implementation of new pric-
ing formulas for Class III and Class IV milk. In the
event that the Secretary of Agriculture is enjoined or
otherwise restrained by a court order from imple-
menting a final decision within the time period speci-
fied in subsection (c), the length of time for which that
injunction or other restraining order is effective shall
be added to the time limitations specified in subsection
(c) thereby extending those time limitations by a pe-
riod of time equal to the period of time for which the
injunction or other restraining order is effective.
‘‘(e) FAILURE TO TIMELY COMPLETE RULEMAKING.—If
the Secretary of Agriculture fails to implement new
Class III and Class IV milk pricing formulas within the
time period required under subsection (c) (plus any ad-
ditional period provided under subsection (d)), the Sec-
retary may not assess or collect assessments from milk
producers or handlers under section 8c of the Agricul-
tural Adjustment Act (7 U.S.C. 608c), reenacted with
amendments by the Agricultural Marketing Agreement
Act of 1937, for marketing order administration and
services provided under such section after the end of
that period until the pricing formulas are imple-
mented. The Secretary may not reduce the level of
services provided under that section on account of the
prohibition against assessments, but shall rather cover
the cost of marketing order administration and serv-
ices through funds available for the Agricultural Mar-
keting Service of the Department.
‘‘(f) IMPLEMENTATION
OF REQUIREMENT.—The imple-
mentation of the final decision on new Class III and
Class IV milk pricing formulas shall not be subject to
congressional review under chapter 8 of title 5, United
States Code.’’
§ 7254. Effect on fluid milk standards in State of
California
Nothing in this Act or any other provision of
law shall be construed to preempt, prohibit, or
otherwise limit the authority of the State of
California, directly or indirectly, to establish or
continue to effect any law, regulation, or re-
quirement regarding—
(1) the percentage of milk solids or solids
not fat in fluid milk products sold at retail or
marketed in the State of California; or
(2) the labeling of such fluid milk products
with regard to milk solids or solids not fat.
(Pub. L. 104–127, title I, § 144, Apr. 4, 1996, 110
Stat. 917.)
§ 7255. Milk manufacturing marketing adjust-
ment
(a) Maximum allowances established
No State shall provide for a manufacturing al-
lowance for the processing of milk in excess of—
(1) $1.65 per hundredweight of milk for milk
manufactured into butter and nonfat dry
milk; and
(2) $1.80 per hundredweight of milk for milk
manufactured into cheese.
(b) ‘‘Manufacturing allowance’’ defined
In this section, the term ‘‘manufacturing al-
lowance’’ means—
(1) the amount by which the product price
value of butter and nonfat dry milk manufac-
tured from a hundred pounds of milk con-
taining 3.5 pounds of butterfat and 8.7 pounds
of milk solids not fat resulting from a State’s
yield and product price formulas exceeds the
class price for the milk used to produce those
products; or
(2) the amount by which the product price
value of cheese manufactured from a hundred
pounds of milk containing 3.5 pounds of but-
terfat and 8.7 pounds of milk solids not fat re-
sulting from a State’s yield and product price
formulas exceeds the class price for the milk
used to produce cheese.
(c) Effect of violation
If the Secretary determines following a hear-
ing that a State has in effect a manufacturing
allowance that exceeds the manufacturing al-
lowance authorized in subsection (a), the Sec-
retary shall suspend purchases of cheddar
cheese, butter, and nonfat dry milk produced in
that State until such time as the State complies
with such subsection.
(d) Effective date; implementation
This section (other than subsection (e) 1) shall
be effective during the period beginning on the
first day of the first month beginning after April
4, 1996, and ending on December 31, 1999. During
that period, the Secretary may exercise the au-
thority provided to the Secretary under this sec-
tion without regard to the issuance of regula-
tions intended to carry out this section.
(Pub. L. 104–127, title I, § 145, Apr. 4, 1996, 110
Stat. 917.)
Editorial Notes
CODIFICATION
Section is comprised of section 145 of Pub. L. 104–127.
Subsec. (e) of section 145 of Pub. L. 104–127 repealed sec-
tion 1446e–1 of this title and enacted provisions set out
as a note under section 1446e–1 of this title.
§ 7256. Northeast Interstate Dairy Compact
Congress hereby consents to the Northeast
Interstate Dairy Compact entered into among
the States of Connecticut, Maine, Massachu-
setts,
New
Hampshire,
Rhode
Island
and
Vermont as specified in section 1(b) Senate 1
Joint Resolution 28 of the 104th Congress, as
placed on the calendar of the Senate, subject to
the following conditions:
(1) Finding of compelling public interest
Based upon a finding by the Secretary of a
compelling public interest in the Compact re-
gion, the Secretary may grant the States that
have ratified the Northeast Interstate Dairy
Compact, as of April 4, 1996, the authority to
implement the Northeast Interstate Dairy
Compact.
(2) Limitation on manufacturing price
The Northeast Interstate Dairy Compact
Commission shall not regulate Class II, Class
III, or Class III–A milk used for manufacturing
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
### Statutory Notes
Section, act Oct. 31, 1949, ch. 792, title II, § 204, as added Nov. 28, 1990, Pub. L. 101–624, title I, § 101(a), 104 Stat. 3374; amended Nov. 5, 1990, Pub. L. 101–508, title I, § 1105(g), 104 Stat. 1388–6; Dec. 13, 1991, Pub. L. 102–237, title I, §§ 113(10), 127(a), 105 Stat. 1838, 1846; Aug. 10, 1993, Pub. L. 103–66, title I, § 1105(a), 107 Stat. 316; May 6, 1994, Pub. L. 103–247, § 1(c), 108 Stat. 618, related to milk price support and milk inventory management program for calendar years 1991 through 1996.
#### Effective Date of Repeal
Pub. L. 104–127, title I, § 141(g), Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 915, provided that the repeal of this section is effective on the first day of the first month beginning after Apr. 4, 1996.
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 7 U.S.C. § 1446e
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 7 U.S.C. § 1446e. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 785
TITLE 7—AGRICULTURE
§ 1446e
the acquisition and disposal of Commodity Credit Cor-
poration purchases of dairy products.’’
§ 1446c–1. Reduction of dairy product inventories
The Secretary of Agriculture shall utilize, to
the fullest extent practicable, the authorities
under the Commodity Credit Corporation Char-
ter Act [15 U.S.C. 714 et seq.] (including expor-
tation of dairy products at not less than pre-
vailing world market prices), the Food for Peace
Act [7 U.S.C. 1691 et seq.], and other authorities
available to the Secretary to reduce inventories
of dairy products held by the Commodity Credit
Corporation so as to reduce net Commodity
Credit Corporation expenditures to the esti-
mated outlays for the milk price support pro-
gram used in developing budget outlays under
the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 for the ap-
propriate fiscal year.
(Pub. L. 97–98, title I, § 106, Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat.
1220; Pub. L. 110–246, title III, § 3001(b)(1)(A),
(2)(A), June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1820.)
Editorial Notes
REFERENCES IN TEXT
The Commodity Credit Corporation Charter Act, re-
ferred to in text, is act June 29, 1948, ch. 704, 62 Stat.
1070, which is classified generally to subchapter II (§ 714
et seq.) of chapter 15 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade.
For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see
Short Title note set out under section 714 of Title 15
and Tables.
The Food for Peace Act, referred to in text, is act
July 10, 1954, ch. 469, 68 Stat. 454, which is classified
generally to chapter 41 (§ 1691 et seq.) of this title. For
complete classification of this Act to the Code, see
Short Title note set out under section 1691 of this title
and Tables.
The Congressional Budget Act of 1974, referred to in
text, is titles I through IX of
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 7 U.S.C. § 1446e
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 7 U.S.C. § 1446e. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
(1) **Issuance by Secretary** — The Secretary of Agriculture shall, subject to the provisions of this section, issue, and from time to time amend, orders applicable to processors, associations of producers, and others engaged in the handling of any agricultural commodity or product thereof specified in subsection (2) of this section. Such persons are referred to in this chapter as “handlers”. Such orders shall regulate, in the manner hereinafter in this section provided, only such handling of such agricultural commodity, or product thereof, as is in the current of interstate or foreign commerce, or which directly burdens, obstructs, or affects, interstate or foreign commerce in such commodity or product thereof. In carrying out this section, the Secretary shall complete all informal rulemaking actions necessary to respond to recommendations submitted by administrative committees for such orders as expeditiously as possible, but not more than 45 days (to the extent practicable) after submission of the committee recommendations. The Secretary is authorized to implement a producer allotment program and a handler withholding program under the cranberry marketing order in the same crop year through informal rulemaking based on a recommendation and supporting economic analysis submitted by the Cranberry Marketing Committee. Such recommendation and analysis shall be submitted by the Committee no later than March 1 of each year. The Secretary shall establish time frames for each office and agency within the Department of Agriculture to consider the committee recommendations.
(2) **Commodities to which applicable** — Orders issued pursuant to this section shall be applicable only to (A) the following agricultural commodities and the products thereof (except canned or frozen pea
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 7 U.S.C. § 608c
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 7 U.S.C. § 608c. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 460
TITLE 7—AGRICULTURE
§ 608c
1 See References in Text note below.
dition to those handlers who have entered
into the agreement; and
(ii) be paid to the Secretary.
(2) Violation of this subsection by a person
who has not entered into such an agreement
shall result in the assessment by the Secretary
of a penalty equal to 140 percent of the support
price for quota peanuts multiplied by the quan-
tity of peanuts sold or disposed of in violation of
subsection (b)(1)(B), as determined under section
1445c–3 1 of this title, for the marketing year for
the crop with respect to which such violation
occurs.
(May 12, 1933, ch. 25, title I, § 8b, formerly § 8(2),
48 Stat. 34; Apr. 7, 1934, ch. 103, § 7, 48 Stat. 528;
renumbered and amended Aug. 24, 1935, ch. 641,
§ 4, 49 Stat. 753; June 3, 1937, ch. 296, § 1, 50 Stat.
246; June 30, 1947, ch. 166, title II, § 206(d), 61 Stat.
208; Pub. L. 101–220, § 4, Dec. 12, 1989, 103 Stat.
1878; Pub. L. 102–237, title I, § 115(1), Dec. 13, 1991,
105 Stat. 1840; Pub. L. 103–66, title I, § 1109(b),
Aug. 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 326.)
Editorial Notes
REFERENCES IN TEXT
Section 1445c–3 of this title, referred to in subsec.
(b)(2), was repealed by Pub. L. 104–127, title I,
§ 171(b)(2)(E), Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 938.
CODIFICATION
The provisions appearing in subsec. (a) of this section
except the first sentence, were originally enacted as
part of section 8(2) of act May 12, 1933, and formerly ap-
peared as section 608(2) of this title.
AMENDMENTS
1993—Subsec. (b)(1)(C). Pub. L. 103–66 added subpar.
(C).
1991—Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 102–237 made technical
amendment to reference to section 1445c–3 of this title
involving corresponding provisions of original Act.
1989—Pub. L. 101–220 designated existing provisions as
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 7 U.S.C. § 608c
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 7 U.S.C. § 608c. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Amendment of orders**
(1) **Required consolidation** — The Secretary shall amend Federal milk marketing orders issued under [section 608c of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title7-section608c&num=0&edition=prelim) to limit the number of Federal milk marketing orders to not less than 10 and not more than 14 orders.
(2) **Inclusion of California as separate order** — Upon the petition and approval of California dairy producers in the manner provided in [section 608c of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title7-section608c&num=0&edition=prelim), the Secretary shall designate the State of California as a separate Federal milk marketing order. The order covering California shall have the right to reblend and distribute order receipts to recognize quota value. Subsection (b) does not apply to the authority of the Secretary under this subsection.
(3) **Related issues addressed in consolidation** — Among the issues the Secretary is authorized to implement as part of the consolidation of Federal milk marketing orders are the following:
(A) The use of utilization rates and multiple basing points for the pricing of fluid milk.
(B) The use of uniform multiple component pricing when developing 1 or more basic formula prices for manufacturing milk.
(4) **Effect of existing law** — In implementing the consolidation of Federal milk marketing orders and related reforms under this subsection, the Secretary may not consider, or base any decision on, the table contained in [section 608c(5)(A) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title7-section608c/5/A&num=0&edition=prelim).
**(b) Expedited process**
(1) **Use of informal rulemaking** — To implement the con
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 7 U.S.C. § 7253
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.