49 U.S.C. § 44903 — Air transportation security

Page 1451 TITLE 49—TRANSPORTATION § 44903 § 44903. Air transportation security (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: (1) ADMINISTRATOR.—The term ‘‘Adminis- trator’’ means the Administrator of the Trans- portation Security Administration. (2) LAW ENFORCEMENT PERSONNEL.—The term ‘‘law enforcement personnel’’ means individ- uals— (A) authorized to carry and use firearms; (B) vested with the degree of the police power of arrest the Administrator considers necessary to carry out this section; and (C) identifiable by appropriate indicia of authority. (b) PROTECTION AGAINST VIOLENCE AND PI- RACY.—The Administrator shall prescribe regu- lations to protect passengers and property on an aircraft operating in air transportation or intra- state air transportation against an act of crimi- nal violence or aircraft piracy. When prescribing a regulation under this subsection, the Adminis- trator shall— (1) consult with the Secretary of Transpor- tation, the Attorney General, the heads of other departments, agencies, and instrumen- talities of the United States Government, and State and local authorities; (2) consider whether a proposed regulation is consistent with— (A) protecting passengers; and (B) the public interest in promoting air transportation and intrastate air transpor- tation; (3) to the maximum extent practicable, re- quire a uniform procedure for searching and detaining passengers and property to ensure— (A) their safety; and (B) courteous and efficient treatment by an air carrier, an agent or employee of an air carrier, and Government, State, and local law enforcement personnel carrying out this section; and (4) consider the extent to which a proposed regulation will carry out this section. (c) SECURITY PROGRAMS.—(1) The Adminis- trator shall prescribe regulations under sub- section (b) of this section that require each op- erator of an airport regularly serving an air car- rier holding a certificate issued by the Secretary of Transportation to establish an air transpor- tation security program that provides a law en- forcement presence and capability at each of those airports that is adequate to ensure the safety of passengers. The regulations shall au- thorize the operator to use the services of quali- fied State, local, and private law enforcement personnel. When the Administrator decides, after being notified by an operator in the form the Administrator prescribes, that not enough qualified State, local, and private law enforce- ment personnel are available to carry out sub- section (b), the Administrator may authorize the operator to use, on a reimbursable basis, personnel employed by the Administrator, or by another department, agency, or instrumentality of the Government with the consent of the head of the department, agency, or instrumentality, to supplement State, local, and private law en- forcement personnel. When deciding whether ad- ditional personnel are needed, the Adminis- trator shall consider the number of passengers boarded at the airport, the extent of anticipated risk of criminal violence or aircraft piracy at the airport or to the air carrier aircraft oper- ations at the airport, and the availability of qualified State or local law enforcement per- sonnel at the airport. (2)(A) The Administrator may approve a secu- rity program of an airport operator, or an amendment in an existing program, that incor- porates a security program of an airport tenant (except an air carrier separately complying with part 108 or 129 of title 14, Code of Federal Regu- lations) having access to a secured area of the airport, if the program or amendment incor- porates— (i) the measures the tenant will use, within the tenant’s leased areas or areas designated for the tenant’s exclusive use under an agree- ment with the airport operator, to carry out the security requirements imposed by the Ad- ministrator on the airport operator under the access control system requirements of section 107.14 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, or under other requirements of part 107 of title 14; and (ii) the methods the airport operator will use to monitor and audit the tenant’s compliance with the security requirements and provides that the tenant will be required to pay mone- tary penalties to the airport operator if the tenant fails to carry out a security require- ment under a contractual provision or require- ment imposed by the airport operator. (B) If the Administrator approves a program or amendment described in subparagraph (A) of this paragraph, the airport operator may not be found to be in violation of a requirement of this subsection or subsection (b) of this section when the airport operator demonstrates that the ten- ant or an employee, permittee, or invitee of the tenant is responsible for the violation and that the airport operator has complied with all meas- ures in its security program for securing compli- ance with its security program by the tenant. (C) MAXIMUM USE OF CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WEAPON DETECTION EQUIPMENT.—The Secretary of Transportation may require airports to maxi- mize the use of technology and equipment that is designed to detect or neutralize potential chemical or biological weapons. (3) PILOT PROGRAMS.—The Administrator shall establish pilot programs in no fewer than 20 air- ports to test and evaluate new and emerging technology for providing access control and other security protections for closed or secure areas of the airports. Such technology may in- clude biometric or other technology that en- sures only authorized access to secure areas. (d) AUTHORIZING INDIVIDUALS TO CARRY FIRE- ARMS AND MAKE ARRESTS.—With the approval of the Attorney General and the Secretary of State, the Administrator may authorize an indi- vidual who carries out air transportation secu- rity duties— (1) to carry firearms; and (2) to make arrests without warrant for an offense against the United States committed in the presence of the individual or for a fel- ony under the laws of the United States, if the Page 1452 TITLE 49—TRANSPORTATION § 44903 1 So in original. Probably should be ‘‘subsection (c)’’. individual reasonably believes the individual to be arrested has committed or is committing a felony. (e) EXCLUSIVE RESPONSIBILITY OVER PAS- SENGER SAFETY.—The Administrator has the ex- clusive responsibility to direct law enforcement activity related to the safety of passengers on an aircraft involved in an offense under section 46502 of this title from the moment all external doors of the aircraft are closed following board- ing until those doors are opened to allow pas- sengers to leave the aircraft. When requested by the Administrator, other departments, agencies, and instrumentalities of the Government shall provide assistance necessary to carry out this subsection. (f) GOVERNMENT AND INDUSTRY CONSORTIA.— The Administrator may establish at airports such consortia of government and aviation in- dustry representatives as the Administrator may designate to provide advice on matters re- lated to aviation security and safety. Such con- sortia shall not be considered Federal advisory committees for purposes of chapter 10 of title 5. (g) IMPROVEMENT OF SECURED-AREA ACCESS CONTROL.— (1) ENFORCEMENT.— (A) ADMINISTRATOR TO PUBLISH SANC- TIONS.—The Administrator shall publish in the Federal Register a list of sanctions for use as guidelines in the discipline of employ- ees for infractions of airport access control requirements. The guidelines shall incor- porate a progressive disciplinary approach that relates proposed sanctions to the sever- ity or recurring nature of the infraction and shall include measures such as remedial training, suspension from security-related duties, suspension from all duties without pay, and termination of employment. (B) USE OF SANCTIONS.—Each airport oper- ator, air carrier, and security screening company shall include the list of sanctions published by the Administrator in its secu- rity program. The security program shall in- clude a process for taking prompt discipli- nary action against an employee who com- mits an infraction of airport access control requirements. (2) IMPROVEMENTS.—The Administrator shall— (A) work with airport operators and air carriers to implement and strengthen exist- ing controls to eliminate airport access con- trol weaknesses; (B) require airport operators and air car- riers to develop and implement comprehen- sive and recurring training programs that teach employees their roles in airport secu- rity, the importance of their participation, how their performance will be evaluated, and what action will be taken if they fail to perform; (C) require airport operators and air car- riers to develop and implement programs that foster and reward compliance with air- port access control requirements and dis- courage and penalize noncompliance in ac- cordance with guidelines issued by the Ad- ministrator to measure employee compli- ance; (D) on an ongoing basis, assess and test for compliance with access control require- ments, report annually findings of the as- sessments, and assess the effectiveness of penalties in ensuring compliance with secu- rity procedures and take any other appro- priate enforcement actions when noncompli- ance is found; (E) improve and better administer the Ad- ministrator’s security database to ensure its efficiency, reliability, and usefulness for identification of systemic problems and allo- cation of resources; (F) improve the execution of the Adminis- trator’s quality control program; and (G) work with airport operators to strengthen access control points in secured areas (including air traffic control oper- ations areas, maintenance areas, crew lounges, baggage handling areas, conces- sions, and catering delivery areas) to ensure the security of passengers and aircraft and consider the deployment of biometric or similar technologies that identify individ- uals based on unique personal characteris- tics. (h) IMPROVED AIRPORT PERIMETER ACCESS SE- CURITY.— (1) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator, in con- sultation with the airport operator and law enforcement authorities, may order the de- ployment of such personnel at any secure area of the airport as necessary to counter the risk of criminal violence, the risk of aircraft pi- racy at the airport, the risk to air carrier air- craft operations at the airport, or to meet na- tional security concerns. (2) SECURITY OF AIRCRAFT AND GROUND ACCESS TO SECURE AREAS.—In determining where to deploy such personnel, the Administrator shall consider the physical security needs of air traffic control facilities, parked aircraft, aircraft servicing equipment, aircraft supplies (including fuel), automobile parking facilities within airport perimeters or adjacent to se- cured facilities, and access and transition areas at airports served by other means of ground or water transportation. (3) DEPLOYMENT OF FEDERAL LAW ENFORCE- MENT PERSONNEL.—The Secretary of Homeland Security may enter into a memorandum of un- derstanding or other agreement with the At- torney General or the head of any other appro- priate Federal law enforcement agency to de- ploy Federal law enforcement personnel at an airport in order to meet aviation safety and security concerns. (4) AIRPORT PERIMETER SCREENING.—The Ad- ministrator— (A) shall require screening or inspection of all individuals, goods, property, vehicles, and other equipment before entry into a se- cured area of an airport in the United States described in section 44903(c); 1 (B) shall prescribe specific requirements for such screening and inspection that will assure at least the same level of protection as will result from screening of passengers and their baggage; Page 1453 TITLE 49—TRANSPORTATION § 44903 (C) shall establish procedures to ensure the safety and integrity of— (i) all persons providing services with re- spect to aircraft providing passenger air transportation or intrastate air transpor- tation and facilities of such persons at an airport in the United States described in subsection (c); (ii) all supplies, including catering and passenger amenities, placed aboard such aircraft, including the sealing of supplies to ensure easy visual detection of tam- pering; and (iii) all persons providing such supplies and facilities of such persons; (D) shall require vendors having direct ac- cess to the airfield and aircraft to develop security programs; and (E) shall issue guidance for the use of bio- metric or other technology that positively verifies the identity of each employee and law enforcement officer who enters a secure area of an airport. (5) USE OF BIOMETRIC TECHNOLOGY IN AIRPORT ACCESS CONTROL SYSTEMS.—In issuing guidance under paragraph (4)(E), the Administrator in consultation with representatives of the avia- tion industry, the biometric identifier indus- try, and the National Institute of Standards and Technology, shall establish, at a min- imum— (A) comprehensive technical and oper- ational system requirements and perform- ance standards for the use of biometric iden- tifier technology in airport access control systems (including airport perimeter access control systems) to ensure that the biomet- ric identifier systems are effective, reliable, and secure; (B) a list of products and vendors that meet the requirements and standards set forth in subparagraph (A); (C) procedures for implementing biometric identifier systems— (i) to ensure that individuals do not use an assumed identity to enroll in a biomet- ric identifier system; and (ii) to resolve failures to enroll, false matches, and false non-matches; and (D) best practices for incorporating bio- metric identifier technology into airport ac- cess control systems in the most effective manner, including a process to best utilize existing airport access control systems, fa- cilities, and equipment and existing data networks connecting airports. (6) USE OF BIOMETRIC TECHNOLOGY FOR ARMED LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAVEL.— (A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Home- land Security, in consultation with the At- torney General, shall— (i) implement this paragraph by publica- tion in the Federal Register; and (ii) establish a national registered armed law enforcement program, that shall be federally managed, for law enforcement of- ficers needing to be armed when traveling by commercial aircraft. (B) PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS.—The program shall— (i) establish a credential or a system that incorporates biometric technology and other applicable technologies; (ii) establish a system for law enforce- ment officers who need to be armed when traveling by commercial aircraft on a reg- ular basis and for those who need to be armed during temporary travel assign- ments; (iii) comply with other uniform credentialing initiatives, including the Homeland Security Presidential Directive 12; (iv) apply to all Federal, State, local, tribal, and territorial government law en- forcement agencies; and (v) establish a process by which the trav- el credential or system may be used to verify the identity, using biometric tech- nology, of a Federal, State, local, tribal, or territorial law enforcement officer seeking to carry a weapon on board a commercial aircraft, without unnecessarily disclosing to the public that the individual is a law enforcement officer. (C) PROCEDURES.—In establishing the pro- gram, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall develop procedures— (i) to ensure that a law enforcement offi- cer of a Federal, State, local, tribal, or ter- ritorial government flying armed has a specific reason for flying armed and the reason is within the scope of the duties of such officer; (ii) to preserve the anonymity of the armed law enforcement officer; (iii) to resolve failures to enroll, false matches, and false nonmatches relating to the use of the law enforcement travel cre- dential or system; (iv) to determine the method of issuance of the biometric credential to law enforce- ment officers needing to be armed when traveling by commercial aircraft; (v) to invalidate any law enforcement travel credential or system that is lost, stolen, or no longer authorized for use; (vi) to coordinate the program with the Federal Air Marshal Service, including the force multiplier program of the Service; and (vii) to implement a phased approach to launching the program, addressing the im- mediate needs of the relevant Federal agent population before expanding to other law enforcement populations. (7) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection, the fol- lowing definitions apply: (A) BIOMETRIC IDENTIFIER INFORMATION.— The term ‘‘biometric identifier information’’ means the distinct physical or behavioral characteristics of an individual that are used for unique identification, or verification of the identity, of an individual. (B) BIOMETRIC IDENTIFIER.—The term ‘‘bio- metric identifier’’ means a technology that enables the automated identification, or verification of the identity, of an individual based on biometric information. (C) FAILURE TO ENROLL.—The term ‘‘failure to enroll’’ means the inability of an indi- Page 1454 TITLE 49—TRANSPORTATION § 44903 vidual to enroll in a biometric identifier sys- tem due to an insufficiently distinctive bio- metric sample, the lack of a body part nec- essary to provide the biometric sample, a system design that makes it difficult to pro- vide consistent biometric identifier informa- tion, or other factors. (D) FALSE MATCH.—The term ‘‘false match’’ means the incorrect matching of one individual’s biometric identifier information to another individual’s biometric identifier information by a biometric identifier sys- tem. (E) FALSE NON-MATCH.—The term ‘‘false non-match’’ means the rejection of a valid identity by a biometric identifier system. (F) SECURE AREA OF AN AIRPORT.—The term ‘‘secure area of an airport’’ means the sterile area and the Secure Identification Display Area of an airport (as such terms are defined in section 1540.5 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, or any successor regulation to such section). (i) AUTHORITY TO ARM FLIGHT DECK CREW WITH LESS-THAN-LETHAL WEAPONS.— (1) IN GENERAL.—If the Administrator, after receiving the recommendations of the Na- tional Institute of Justice, determines, with the approval of the Attorney General and the Secretary of State, that it is appropriate and necessary and would effectively serve the pub- lic interest in avoiding air piracy, the Admin- istrator may authorize members of the flight deck crew on any aircraft providing air trans- portation or intrastate air transportation to carry a less-than-lethal weapon while the air- craft is engaged in providing such transpor- tation. (2) USAGE.—If the Administrator grants au- thority under paragraph (1) for flight deck crew members to carry a less-than-lethal weapon while engaged in providing air trans- portation or intrastate air transportation, the Administrator shall— (A) prescribe rules requiring that any such crew member be trained in the proper use of the weapon; and (B) prescribe guidelines setting forth the circumstances under which such weapons may be used. (3) REQUEST OF AIR CARRIERS TO USE LESS- THAN-LETHAL WEAPONS.—If the Administrator receives a request from an air carrier for au- thorization to allow pilots of the air carrier to carry less-than-lethal weapons, the Adminis- trator shall respond to that request within 90 days. (j) SHORT-TERM ASSESSMENT AND DEPLOYMENT OF EMERGING SECURITY TECHNOLOGIES AND PRO- CEDURES.— (1) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator shall pe- riodically recommend to airport operators commercially available measures or proce- dures to prevent access to secure airport areas by unauthorized persons. (2) SECURE FLIGHT PROGRAM.— (A) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator shall ensure that the Secure Flight program, or any successor program— (i) is used to evaluate all passengers be- fore they board an aircraft; and (ii) includes procedures to ensure that individuals selected by the program and their carry-on and checked baggage are adequately screened. (B) MODIFICATIONS.—The Administrator may modify any requirement under the Se- cure Flight program for flights that origi- nate and terminate within the same State, if the Administrator determines that— (i) the State has extraordinary air trans- portation needs or concerns due to its iso- lation and dependence on air transpor- tation; and (ii) the routine characteristics of pas- sengers, given the nature of the market, regularly triggers primary selectee status. (C) ADVANCED AIRLINE PASSENGER PRESCREENING.— (i) COMMENCEMENT OF TESTING.—The Ad- ministrator shall commence testing of an advanced passenger prescreening system that will allow the Department of Home- land Security to assume the performance of comparing passenger information, as de- fined by the Administrator, to the auto- matic selectee and no fly lists, utilizing all appropriate records in the consolidated and integrated terrorist watchlist main- tained by the Federal Government. (ii) ASSUMPTION OF FUNCTION.—The Ad- ministrator, or the designee of the Admin- istrator, shall begin to assume the per- formance of the passenger prescreening function of comparing passenger informa- tion to the automatic selectee and no fly lists and utilize all appropriate records in the consolidated and integrated terrorist watchlist maintained by the Federal Gov- ernment in performing that function. (iii) REQUIREMENTS.—In assuming per- formance of the function under clause (ii), the Administrator shall— (I) establish a procedure to enable air- line passengers, who are delayed or pro- hibited from boarding a flight because the advanced passenger prescreening sys- tem determined that they might pose a security threat, to appeal such deter- mination and correct information con- tained in the system; (II) ensure that Federal Government databases that will be used to establish the identity of a passenger under the system will not produce a large number of false positives; (III) establish an internal oversight board to oversee and monitor the man- ner in which the system is being imple- mented; (IV) establish sufficient operational safeguards to reduce the opportunities for abuse; (V) implement substantial security measures to protect the system from un- authorized access; (VI) adopt policies establishing effec- tive oversight of the use and operation of the system; and (VII) ensure that there are no specific privacy concerns with the technological architecture of the system. Page 1455 TITLE 49—TRANSPORTATION § 44903 2 So in original. (iv) PASSENGER INFORMATION.—After the completion of the testing of the advanced passenger prescreening system, the Ad- ministrator, by order or interim final rule— (I) shall require air carriers to supply to the Administrator the passenger in- formation needed to begin implementing the advanced passenger prescreening sys- tem; and (II) shall require entities that provide systems and services to air carriers in the operation of air carrier reservations systems to provide to air carriers pas- senger information in possession of such entities, but only to the extent nec- essary to comply with subclause (I). (v) INCLUSION OF DETAINEES ON NO FLY LIST.—The Administrator, in coordination with the Terrorist Screening Center, shall include on the No Fly List any individual who was a detainee held at the Naval Sta- tion, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, unless the President certifies in writing to Congress that the detainee poses no threat to the United States, its citizens, or its allies. For purposes of this clause, the term ‘‘de- tainee’’ means an individual in the cus- tody or under the physical control of the United States as a result of armed con- flict. (D) SCREENING OF EMPLOYEES AGAINST WATCHLIST.—The Administrator, in coordi- nation with the Secretary of Transportation and the Administrator of the Federal Avia- tion Administration, shall ensure that indi- viduals are screened against all appropriate records in the consolidated and integrated terrorist watchlist maintained by the Fed- eral Government before— (i) being certificated by the Federal Aviation Administration; (ii) being granted unescorted access to the secure area of an airport; or (iii) being granted unescorted access to the air operations area (as defined in sec- tion 1540.5 of title 49, Code of Federal Reg- ulations, or any successor regulation to such section) of an airport. (E) AIRCRAFT CHARTER CUSTOMER AND LES- SEE PRESCREENING.— (i) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator Ad- ministrator 2 shall establish a process by which operators of aircraft to be used in charter air transportation with a max- imum takeoff weight greater than 12,500 pounds and lessors of aircraft with a max- imum takeoff weight greater than 12,500 pounds may— (I) request the Department of Home- land Security to use the advanced pas- senger prescreening system to compare information about any individual seek- ing to charter an aircraft with a max- imum takeoff weight greater than 12,500 pounds, any passenger proposed to be transported aboard such aircraft, and any individual seeking to lease an air- craft with a maximum takeoff weight greater than 12,500 pounds to the auto- matic selectee and no fly lists, utilizing all appropriate records in the consoli- dated and integrated terrorist watchlist maintained by the Federal Government; and (II) refuse to charter or lease an air- craft with a maximum takeoff weight greater than 12,500 pounds to or trans- port aboard such aircraft any persons identified on such watch list. (ii) REQUIREMENTS.—The requirements of subparagraph (C)(iii) shall apply to this subparagraph. (iii) NO FLY AND AUTOMATIC SELECTEE LISTS.—The Secretary of Homeland Secu- rity, in consultation with the Terrorist Screening Center, shall design and review, as necessary, guidelines, policies, and op- erating procedures for the collection, re- moval, and updating of data maintained, or to be maintained, in the no fly and automatic selectee lists. (F) APPLICABILITY.—Section 607 of the Vi- sion 100—Century of Aviation Reauthoriza- tion Act (49 U.S.C. 44903 note; 117 Stat. 2568) shall not apply to the advanced passenger prescreening system established under sub- paragraph (C). (G) APPEAL PROCEDURES.— (i) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator shall establish a timely and fair process for indi- viduals identified as a threat under one or more of subparagraphs (C), (D), and (E) to appeal to the Transportation Security Ad- ministration the determination and cor- rect any erroneous information. (ii) RECORDS.—The process shall include the establishment of a method by which the Administrator will be able to maintain a record of air passengers and other indi- viduals who have been misidentified and have corrected erroneous information. To prevent repeated delays of misidentified passengers and other individuals, the Transportation Security Administration record shall contain information deter- mined by the Administrator to authen- ticate the identity of such a passenger or individual. (H) DEFINITION.—In this paragraph, the term ‘‘secure area of an airport’’ means the sterile area and the Secure Identification Display Area of an airport (as such terms are defined in section 1540.5 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, or any successor regu- lation to such section). (k) LIMITATION ON LIABILITY FOR ACTS TO THWART CRIMINAL VIOLENCE OR AIRCRAFT PI- RACY.—An individual shall not be liable for dam- ages in any action brought in a Federal or State court arising out of the acts of the individual in attempting to thwart an act of criminal vio- lence or piracy on an aircraft if that individual reasonably believed that such an act of criminal violence or piracy was occurring or was about to occur. (l) AIR CHARTER PROGRAM.— Page 1456 TITLE 49—TRANSPORTATION § 44903 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator shall implement an aviation security program for charter air carriers (as defined in section 40102(a)) with a maximum certificated takeoff weight of more than 12,500 pounds. (2) EXEMPTION FOR ARMED FORCES CHAR- TERS.— (A) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) and the other requirements of this chapter do not apply to passengers and property carried by aircraft when employed to provide charter transportation to members of the armed forces. (B) SECURITY PROCEDURES.—The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Sec- retary of Homeland Security and the Sec- retary of Transportation, shall establish se- curity procedures relating to the operation of aircraft when employed to provide charter transportation to members of the armed forces to or from an airport described in sec- tion 44903(c). (C) ARMED FORCES DEFINED.—In this para- graph, the term ‘‘armed forces’’ has the meaning given that term by section 101(a)(4) of title 10. (m) SECURITY SCREENING FOR MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES.— (1) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator, in con- sultation with the Department of Defense, shall develop and implement a plan to provide expedited security screening services for a member of the armed forces, and, to the ex- tent possible, any accompanying family mem- ber, if the member of the armed forces, while in uniform, presents documentation indicating official orders for air transportation departing from a primary airport (as defined in section 47102). (2) PROTOCOLS.—In developing the plan, the Administrator shall consider— (A) leveraging existing security screening models used to reduce passenger wait times; (B) establishing standard guidelines for the screening of military uniform items, in- cluding combat boots; and (C) incorporating any new screening proto- cols into an existing trusted passenger pro- gram, as established pursuant to section 109(a)(3) of the Aviation and Transportation Security Act (49 U.S.C. 114 note), or into the development of any new credential or sys- tem that incorporates biometric technology and other applicable technologies to verify the identity of individuals traveling in air transportation. (3) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this subsection shall affect the authority of the Administrator to require additional screening of a member of the armed forces if intelligence or law enforcement information indicates that additional screening is necessary. (4) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—The Administrator shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the implementation of the plan. (n) PASSENGER EXIT POINTS FROM STERILE AREA.— (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Homeland Security shall ensure that the Transportation Security Administration is responsible for monitoring passenger exit points from the sterile area of airports at which the Transpor- tation Security Administration provided such monitoring as of December 1, 2013. (2) STERILE AREA DEFINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘sterile area’’ has the meaning given that term in section 1540.5 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations (or any corresponding similar regulation or ruling). (Pub. L. 103–272, § 1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1205; Pub. L. 106–181, title VII, § 717, Apr. 5, 2000, 114 Stat. 163; Pub. L. 106–528, §§ 4, 6, Nov. 22, 2000, 114 Stat. 2520, 2521; Pub. L. 107–71, title I, §§ 101(f)(7)–(9), 106(a), (c), (d), 120, 126(b), 136, 144, Nov. 19, 2001, 115 Stat. 603, 608–610, 629, 632, 636, 644; Pub. L. 107–296, title XIV, §§ 1405, 1406, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2307; Pub. L. 108–176, title VI, § 606(a), Dec. 12, 2003, 117 Stat. 2568; Pub. L. 108–458, title IV, §§ 4011(a), 4012(a)(1), Dec. 17, 2004, 118 Stat. 3712, 3714; Pub. L. 110–53, title XVI, § 1615(a), Aug. 3, 2007, 121 Stat. 486; Pub. L. 111–83, title V, § 553, Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2179; Pub. L. 112–86, § 2(a), Jan. 3, 2012, 125 Stat. 1874; Pub. L. 113–67, div. A, title VI, § 603, Dec. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 1188; Pub. L. 115–254, div. K, title I, § 1991(d)(3), Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3630; Pub. L. 117–286, § 4(a)(316), Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4340.) HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES Revised Section Source (U.S. Code) Source (Statutes at Large) 44903(a) ...... 49 App.:1357(f). Aug. 23, 1958, Pub. L. 85–726, 72 Stat. 731, § 316(a), (b), (e)(2), (3), (f); added Aug. 5, 1974, Pub. L. 93–366, § 202, 88 Stat. 415, 417. 44903(b) ...... 49 App.:1357(a). 44903(c)(1) .. 49 App.:1357(b). 44903(c)(2) .. 49 App.:1357(g). Aug. 23, 1958, Pub. L. 85–726, 72 Stat. 731, § 316(g); added Aug. 15, 1990, Pub. L. 101–370, § 2, 104 Stat. 451. 44903(d) ...... 49 App.:1356b. Aug. 8, 1985, Pub. L. 99–83, § 553(b), 99 Stat. 226. 44903(e) ...... 49 App.:1357(e)(2), (3). In this section, the word ‘‘passengers’’ is substituted for ‘‘persons’’ for consistency in the revised title. In subsection (a)(2), the words ‘‘the degree of’’ are substituted for ‘‘such’’ for clarity. In subsection (b), before clause (1), the word ‘‘rules’’ is omitted as being synonymous with ‘‘regulations’’. The words ‘‘such reasonable . . . requiring such prac- tices, methods, and procedures, or governing the de- sign, materials, and construction of aircraft, as he may deem necessary’’ are omitted as surplus. The word ‘‘air’’ after ‘‘intrastate’’ is added for clarity and con- sistency. The words ‘‘and amending’’ are omitted as surplus. In clause (1), the words ‘‘the heads of other de- partments, agencies, and instrumentalities of the United States Government, and State and local au- thorities’’ are substituted for ‘‘such other Federal, State, and local agencies’’ for consistency in the re- vised title and with other titles of the United States Code. The words ‘‘as he may deem appropriate’’ are omitted as surplus. In clause (2)(A), the words ‘‘in air transportation or intrastate air transportation against acts of criminal violence and aircraft piracy’’ are omit- ted as surplus. In clause (3), before subclause (A), the words ‘‘inspection’’ and ‘‘in air transportation and intrastate air transportation’’ are omitted as surplus. In subclause (B), the words ‘‘that they will receive’’ and ‘‘any air transportation security program established under’’ are omitted as surplus. In clause (4), the words ‘‘contribute to . . . the purposes of’’ are omitted as sur- plus. In subsection (c)(1), the words ‘‘traveling in air trans- portation or intrastate air transportation from acts of Page 1457 TITLE 49—TRANSPORTATION § 44903 criminal violence and aircraft piracy’’ and ‘‘whose serv- ices are made available by their employers’’ are omit- ted as surplus. The words ‘‘department, agency, or in- strumentality of the Government’’ are substituted for ‘‘Federal department or agency’’ for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the Code. The word ‘‘When’’ is substituted for ‘‘In any case in which’’ to eliminate unnecessary words. The words ‘‘receipt of’’, ‘‘by order’’, ‘‘the services of’’, ‘‘directly’’, and ‘‘at the airport concerned in such numbers and for such period of time as the Administrator may deem necessary’’ are omitted as surplus. The words ‘‘When deciding whether additional personnel are needed’’ are substituted for ‘‘In making the determination referred to in the pre- ceding sentence’’ for clarity. In subsection (c)(2)(A), before clause (i), the words ‘‘under this section’’ are omitted as surplus. The words ‘‘or an amendment in an existing program’’ are sub- stituted for ‘‘and may approve an amendment to a se- curity program of an airport operator approved by the Administrator under subsection (b)’’ to eliminate un- necessary words. In clause (ii), the word ‘‘monetary’’ is substituted for ‘‘financial’’ for consistency. In subsection (e), the words ‘‘Notwithstanding any other provisions of law’’, ‘‘the commission of’’, ‘‘consid- ered’’, and ‘‘the moment when’’ before ‘‘such door’’ are omitted as surplus. The words ‘‘to allow passengers to leave’’ are substituted for ‘‘disembarkation’’, and the words ‘‘the aircraft’’ are added, for clarity. The words ‘‘departments, agencies, and instrumentalities of the Government’’ are substituted for ‘‘Federal departments and agencies’’ for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the Code. The words ‘‘as may be . . . the purposes of’’ are omitted as surplus. Editorial Notes REFERENCES IN TEXT Section 607 of the Vision 100—Century of Aviation Re- authorization Act, referred to in subsec. (j)(2)(F), is sec- tion 607 of Pub. L. 108–176, which is set out as a note below. AMENDMENTS 2022—Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 117–286 substituted ‘‘chapter 10 of title 5.’’ for ‘‘the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.).’’ 2018—Pub. L. 115–254, § 1991(d)(3)(I), substituted ‘‘Ad- ministrator’’ for ‘‘Under Secretary’’ wherever appear- ing. Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 115–254, § 1991(d)(3)(A), substituted ‘‘Definitions’’ for ‘‘Definition’’ in heading and ‘‘In this section:’’ for ‘‘In this section, ‘law enforcement per- sonnel’ means individuals—’’ in introductory provi- sions, added par. (1), redesignated former pars. (1) to (3) as subpars. (A) to (C) of par. (2), inserted before subpar. (A) ‘‘(2) LAW ENFORCEMENT PERSONNEL.—The term ‘law enforcement personnel’ means individuals—’’, and in subpar. (B) substituted ‘‘Administrator’’ for ‘‘Under Secretary of Transportation for Security’’. Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 115–254, § 1991(d)(3)(B), substituted ‘‘Administrator’’ for ‘‘Secretary of Transportation’’ in introductory provisions. Subsec. (g)(2)(E), (F). Pub. L. 115–254, § 1991(d)(3)(C), substituted ‘‘Administrator’s’’ for ‘‘Under Secretary’s’’. Subsec. (h)(3). Pub. L. 115–254, § 1991(d)(3)(D)(i), sub- stituted ‘‘Secretary of Homeland Security’’ for ‘‘Sec- retary’’. Subsec. (h)(4)(A). Pub. L. 115–254, § 1991(d)(3)(D)(ii)(I), struck out ‘‘, as soon as practicable after the date of enactment of this subsection,’’ after ‘‘shall require’’. Subsec. (h)(4)(C)(i). Pub. L. 115–254, § 1991(d)(3)(D)(ii)(II), substituted ‘‘subsection (c)’’ for ‘‘section 44903(c)’’. Subsec. (h)(4)(E). Pub. L. 115–254, § 1991(d)(3)(D)(ii)(III), struck out ‘‘, not later than March 31, 2005,’’ after ‘‘shall issue’’. Subsec. (h)(5). Pub. L. 115–254, § 1991(d)(3)(D)(iii), sub- stituted ‘‘Administrator’’ for ‘‘Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security (Transportation Security Adminis- tration)’’ in introductory provisions. Subsec. (h)(6)(A). Pub. L. 115–254, § 1991(d)(3)(D)(iv)(I), substituted ‘‘The’’ for ‘‘Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of the Implementing Rec- ommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007, the’’ in introductory provisions. Subsec. (h)(6)(A)(i). Pub. L. 115–254, § 1991(d)(3)(D)(iv)(II), substituted ‘‘paragraph’’ for ‘‘sec- tion’’. Subsec. (h)(6)(C). Pub. L. 115–254, § 1991(d)(3)(D)(v), substituted ‘‘Secretary of Homeland Security’’ for ‘‘Secretary’’ in introductory provisions. Subsec. (i)(3). Pub. L. 115–254, § 1991(d)(3)(E), struck out ‘‘, after the date of enactment of this paragraph,’’ after ‘‘If’’. Subsec. (j)(1). Pub. L. 115–254, § 1991(d)(3)(F)(i), amend- ed par. (1) generally. Prior to amendment, par. (1) re- quired the Under Secretary of Transportation for Secu- rity to recommend to airport operators, within 6 months after Nov. 19, 2001, commercially available measures or procedures to prevent access to secure air- port areas by unauthorized persons. Subsec. (j)(2). Pub. L. 115–254, § 1991(d)(3)(F)(ii)(VII), substituted ‘‘Administrator’’ for ‘‘Assistant Secretary’’ wherever appearing. Pub. L. 115–254, § 1991(d)(3)(F)(ii)(I), substituted ‘‘Se- cure flight program’’ for ‘‘Computer-assisted passenger prescreening system’’ in heading. Subsec. (j)(2)(A). Pub. L. 115–254, § 1991(d)(3)(F)(ii)(II), substituted ‘‘Administrator’’ for ‘‘Secretary of Trans- portation’’, ‘‘Secure Flight program’’ for ‘‘Computer- Assisted Passenger Prescreening System’’, and, in two places, ‘‘program’’ for ‘‘system’’. Subsec. (j)(2)(B). Pub. L. 115–254, § 1991(d)(3)(F)(ii)(III), in introductory provisions, substituted ‘‘Adminis- trator’’ for ‘‘Secretary of Transportation’’, ‘‘Secure Flight program’’ for ‘‘Computer-Assisted Passenger Prescreening System’’, and ‘‘Administrator’’ for ‘‘Sec- retary’’. Subsec. (j)(2)(C)(i). Pub. L. 115–254, § 1991(d)(3)(F)(ii)(IV)(aa), substituted ‘‘The Adminis- trator’’ for ‘‘Not later than January 1, 2005, the Assist- ant Secretary of Homeland Security (Transportation Security Administration), or the designee of the Assist- ant Secretary,’’. Subsec. (j)(2)(C)(ii). Pub. L. 115–254, § 1991(d)(3)(F)(ii)(IV)(bb), substituted ‘‘The’’ for ‘‘Not later than 180 days after completion of testing under clause (i), the’’. Subsec. (j)(2)(C)(iv). Pub. L. 115–254, § 1991(d)(3)(F)(ii)(IV)(cc), substituted ‘‘After’’ for ‘‘Not later than 180 days after’’ in introductory provisions. Subsec. (j)(2)(D). Pub. L. 115–254, § 1991(d)(3)(F)(ii)(V), substituted ‘‘Administrator’’ for ‘‘Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security (Transportation Security Admin- istration)’’ in introductory provisions. Subsec. (j)(2)(E)(i). Pub. L. 115–254, § 1991(d)(3)(F)(ii)(VI), substituted ‘‘The Administrator’’ for ‘‘Not later than 90 days after the date on which the Assistant Secretary assumes the performance of the ad- vanced passenger prescreening function under subpara- graph (C)(ii), the’’ in introductory provisions. Subsec. (l)(1). Pub. L. 115–254, § 1991(d)(3)(G), sub- stituted ‘‘Administrator’’ for ‘‘Under Secretary for Bor- der and Transportation Security of the Department of Homeland Security’’. Subsec. (m). Pub. L. 115–254, § 1991(d)(3)(H)(ii), sub- stituted ‘‘Administrator’’ for ‘‘Assistant Secretary’’ wherever appearing. Subsec. (m)(1). Pub. L. 115–254, § 1991(d)(3)(H)(i), sub- stituted ‘‘Administrator’’ for ‘‘Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security (Transportation Security Adminis- tration)’’. 2013—Subsec. (n). Pub. L. 113–67 added subsec. (n). 2012—Subsec. (m). Pub. L. 112–86 added subsec. (m). 2009—Subsec. (j)(2)(C)(v). Pub. L. 111–83 added cl. (v). 2007—Subsec. (h)(6). Pub. L. 110–53 amended par. (6) generally. Prior to amendment, par. (6) related to es- tablishment of a uniform law enforcement officer trav- Page 1458 TITLE 49—TRANSPORTATION § 44903 el credential incorporating biometric identifier tech- nology not later than 120 days after Dec. 17, 2004. 2004—Subsec. (h)(4)(E). Pub. L. 108–458, § 4011(a)(1), substituted ‘‘shall issue, not later than March 31, 2005, guidance for’’ for ‘‘may provide for’’. Subsec. (h)(5) to (7). Pub. L. 108–458, § 4011(a)(2), added pars. (5) to (7). Subsec. (j)(2)(C) to (H). Pub. L. 108–458, § 4012(a)(1), added subpars. (C) to (H). 2003—Subsec. (l). Pub. L. 108–176 added subsec. (l). 2002—Subsec. (h). Pub. L. 107–296, § 1406(3), redesig- nated subsec. (h), relating to limitation on liability for acts to thwart criminal violence or aircraft piracy, as (k). Pub. L. 107–296, § 1406(2), redesignated subsec. (h), re- lating to authority to arm flight deck crews with less- than-lethal weapons, as (i). Subsec. (i). Pub. L. 107–296, § 1406(2), redesignated sub- sec. (h), relating to authority to arm flight deck crews with less-than-lethal weapons, as (i). Former subsec. (i) redesignated (j). Subsec. (i)(1). Pub. L. 107–296, § 1405(b)(1), substituted ‘‘If the Under Secretary’’ for ‘‘If the Secretary’’ and ‘‘the Under Secretary may’’ for ‘‘the Secretary may’’. Subsec. (i)(2). Pub. L. 107–296, § 1405(b)(2), substituted ‘‘Under Secretary’’ for ‘‘Secretary’’ in two places in in- troductory provisions. Subsec. (i)(3). Pub. L. 107–296, § 1405(a), added par. (3). Subsec. (j). Pub. L. 107–296, § 1406(1), redesignated sub- sec. (i) as (j). Subsec. (k). Pub. L. 107–296, § 1406(3), redesignated subsec. (h), relating to limitation on liability for acts to thwart criminal violence or aircraft piracy, as (k). 2001—Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 107–71, § 101(f)(7), (9), sub- stituted ‘‘Under Secretary of Transportation for Secu- rity’’ for ‘‘Administrator of the Federal Aviation Ad- ministration’’. Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 107–71, § 101(f)(7), substituted ‘‘Under Secretary’’ for ‘‘Administrator’’ in two places in introductory provisions. Subsec. (c)(1), (2)(A), (B). Pub. L. 107–71, § 101(f)(7), substituted ‘‘Under Secretary’’ for ‘‘Administrator’’ wherever appearing. Subsec. (c)(2)(C). Pub. L. 107–71, § 120, amended head- ing and text of subpar. (C) generally, substituting pro- visions relating to maximum use of chemical and bio- logical weapon detection equipment for provisions re- lating to a manual process at explosive detection loca- tions for randomly selecting additional checked bags for screening. Subsec. (c)(3). Pub. L. 107–71, § 106(d), added par. (3). Subsecs. (e), (f), (g)(1)(A), (B). Pub. L. 107–71, § 101(f)(7), substituted ‘‘Under Secretary’’ for ‘‘Adminis- trator’’ wherever appearing. Subsec. (g)(2). Pub. L. 107–71, § 101(f)(7), substituted ‘‘Under Secretary’’ for ‘‘Administrator’’ in introduc- tory provisions. Subsec. (g)(2)(A). Pub. L. 107–71, § 106(c)(1), substituted ‘‘weaknesses;’’ for ‘‘weaknesses by January 31, 2001;’’. Subsec. (g)(2)(D). Pub. L. 107–71, § 106(c)(2), added sub- par. (D) and struck out former subpar. (D) which read as follows: ‘‘assess and test for compliance with access control requirements, report findings, and assess pen- alties or take other appropriate enforcement actions when noncompliance is found;’’. Subsec. (g)(2)(C). Pub. L. 107–71, § 101(f)(7), substituted ‘‘Under Secretary’’ for ‘‘Administrator’’. Subsec. (g)(2)(E). Pub. L. 107–71, § 101(f)(8), substituted ‘‘Under Secretary’s’’ for ‘‘Administrator’s’’. Subsec. (g)(2)(F). Pub. L. 107–71, §§ 101(f)(8), 106(c)(3), substituted ‘‘Under Secretary’s’’ for ‘‘Administrator’s’’ and ‘‘program;’’ for ‘‘program by January 31, 2001;’’. Subsec. (g)(2)(G). Pub. L. 107–71, § 106(c)(4), added sub- par. (G) and struck out former subpar. (G) which read as follows: ‘‘require airport operators and air carriers to strengthen access control points in secured areas (including air traffic control operations areas) to en- sure the security of passengers and aircraft by January 31, 2001.’’ Subsec. (h). Pub. L. 107–71, § 144, which directed that subsec. (h) relating to limitation on liability for acts to thwart criminal violence or aircraft piracy be added at end of section 44903, without specifying the Code title to be amended, was executed by making the addition at the end of this section, to reflect the probable intent of Congress. Pub. L. 107–71, § 126(b), added subsec. (h) relating to authority to arm flight deck crews with less-than-le- thal weapons. Pub. L. 107–71, § 106(a), added subsec. (h) relating to improved airport perimeter access security. Subsec. (i). Pub. L. 107–71, § 136, added subsec. (i). 2000—Subsec. (c)(2)(C). Pub. L. 106–528, § 6, added sub- par. (C). Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 106–181 added subsec. (f). Subsec. (g). Pub. L. 106–528, § 4, added subsec. (g). Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2012 AMENDMENT Pub. L. 112–86, § 2(b), Jan. 3, 2012, 125 Stat. 1875, pro- vided that: ‘‘Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Jan. 3, 2012], the Assistant Sec- retary shall implement the plan required by this Act [amending this section and enacting provisions set out as a note under section 40101 of this title].’’ EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2003 AMENDMENT Amendment by Pub. L. 108–176 applicable only to fis- cal years beginning after Sept. 30, 2003, except as other- wise specifically provided, see section 3 of Pub. L. 108–176, set out as a note under section 106 of this title. EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2002 AMENDMENT Amendment by Pub. L. 107–296 effective 60 days after Nov. 25, 2002, see section 4 of Pub. L. 107–296, set out as an Effective Date note under section 101 of Title 6, Do- mestic Security. EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2000 AMENDMENTS Amendment by Pub. L. 106–528 effective 30 days after Nov. 22, 2000, see section 9 of Pub. L. 106–528, set out as a note under section 106 of this title. Amendment by Pub. L. 106–181 applicable only to fis- cal years beginning after Sept. 30, 1999, see section 3 of Pub. L. 106–181, set out as a note under section 106 of this title. FORMAL POLICY ON SEXUAL ASSAULT AND HARASSMENT ON AIR CARRIERS Pub. L. 118–63, title IV, § 435, May 16, 2024, 138 Stat. 1174, provided that: ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act [May 16, 2024], passenger air carriers operating under part 121 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, shall issue, in consultation with labor unions representing personnel, a formal policy with respect to sexual assault or harassment incidents. ‘‘(b) CONTENTS.—Each policy required under sub- section (a) shall include— ‘‘(1) a statement indicating that no sexual assault or harassment incident is acceptable under any cir- cumstance; ‘‘(2) procedures that facilitate the reporting of a sexual assault or harassment incident, including— ‘‘(A) appropriate public outreach activities; and ‘‘(B) confidential phone and internet-based oppor- tunities for reporting; ‘‘(3) procedures that personnel should follow upon the reporting of a sexual assault or harassment inci- dent, including actions to protect affected individuals from continued sexual assault or harassment and to notify law enforcement, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation, when appropriate; ‘‘(4) procedures that may limit or prohibit, to the extent practicable, future travel with the air carrier by any passenger who commits a sexual assault or harassment incident; and ‘‘(5) training that is required for all appropriate personnel with respect to each such policy, including Page 1459 TITLE 49—TRANSPORTATION § 44903 specific training for personnel who may receive re- ports of sexual assault or harassment incidents. ‘‘(c) PASSENGER INFORMATION.—An air carrier de- scribed in subsection (a) shall display, on the website of the air carrier and through the use of appropriate sign- age, a written statement that informs passengers and personnel of the procedure for reporting a sexual as- sault or harassment incident. ‘‘(d) STANDARD OF CARE.—Compliance with the re- quirements of this section, and any policy issued there- under, shall not determine whether the air carrier de- scribed in subsection (a) has acted with any requisite standard of care. ‘‘(e) RULES OF CONSTRUCTION.— ‘‘(1) EFFECT ON AUTHORITIES.—Nothing in this sec- tion shall be construed as granting the Secretary [of Transportation] any additional authorities beyond ensuring that a passenger air carrier operating under part 121 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations issues a formal policy and displays required information in compliance with this section. ‘‘(2) EFFECT ON OTHER LAWS.—Nothing in this sec- tion shall be construed to alter existing authorities of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Department of Labor, or the Department of Jus- tice to enforce applicable employment and sexual as- sault and sexual harassment laws. ‘‘(f) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: ‘‘(1) PERSONNEL.—The term ‘personnel’ means an employee or contractor of passenger air carrier oper- ating under part 121 of title 14, Code of Federal Regu- lations. ‘‘(2) SEXUAL ASSAULT.—The term ‘sexual assault’ means the occurrence of an act that constitutes any nonconsensual sexual act proscribed by Federal, trib- al, or State law, including when the victim lacks ca- pacity to consent. ‘‘(3) SEXUAL ASSAULT OR HARASSMENT INCIDENT.— The term ‘sexual assault or harassment incident’ means the occurrence, or reasonably suspected occur- rence, of an act that— ‘‘(A) constitutes sexual assault or sexual harass- ment; and ‘‘(B) is committed— ‘‘(i) by a passenger or personnel against another passenger or personnel; and ‘‘(ii) within an aircraft or in an area in which passengers are entering or exiting an aircraft.’’ SECONDARY COCKPIT BARRIERS Pub. L. 118–63, title III, § 350, May 16, 2024, 138 Stat. 1110, provided that: ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 6 months after the date of enactment of this Act [May 16, 2024], the Ad- ministrator [of the Federal Aviation Administration] shall convene an aviation rulemaking committee to re- view and develop findings and recommendations to re- quire installation of a secondary cockpit barrier on commercial passenger aircraft operated under the pro- visions of part 121 of title 14, Code of Federal Regula- tions, that are not captured under another regulation or proposed regulation. ‘‘(b) MEMBERSHIP.—The Administrator shall appoint a chair and members of the rulemaking committee con- vened under subsection (a), which shall be comprised of at least 1 representative from the constituencies of— ‘‘(1) mainline air carriers; ‘‘(2) regional air carriers; ‘‘(3) aircraft manufacturers; ‘‘(4) passenger aircraft pilots represented by a labor group; ‘‘(5) flight attendants represented by a labor group; ‘‘(6) airline passengers; and ‘‘(7) other stakeholders the Administrator deter- mines appropriate. ‘‘(c) CONSIDERATIONS.—The aviation rulemaking com- mittee convened under subsection (a) shall consider— ‘‘(1) minimum dimension requirements for sec- ondary barriers on all aircraft types operated under part 121 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations; ‘‘(2) secondary barrier performance standards man- ufacturers and air carriers must meet for such air- craft types; ‘‘(3) the availability of certified secondary barriers suitable for use on such aircraft types; ‘‘(4) the development, certification, testing, manu- facturing, installation, and training for secondary barriers for such aircraft types; ‘‘(5) flight duration and stage length; ‘‘(6) the location of lavatories on such aircraft as related to operational complexities; ‘‘(7) operational complexities; ‘‘(8) any risks to safely evacuate passengers of such aircraft; and ‘‘(9) other considerations the Administrator deter- mines appropriate. ‘‘(d) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 12 months after the convening of the aviation rulemaking com- mittee described in subsection (a), the Administrator shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress [Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and Committee on Transportation and In- frastructure of the House of Representatives] a report based on the findings and recommendations of the avia- tion rulemaking committee convened under subsection (a), including— ‘‘(1) if applicable, any dissenting positions on the findings and the rationale for each position; and ‘‘(2) any disagreements with the recommendations, including the rationale for each disagreement and the reasons for the disagreement. ‘‘(e) INSTALLATION OF SECONDARY COCKPIT BARRIERS OF EXISTING AIRCRAFT.—Not later than 36 months after the date of the submission of the report under sub- section (d), the Administrator shall, taking into consid- eration the final reported findings and recommenda- tions of the aviation rulemaking committee, issue a final rule requiring installation of a secondary cockpit barrier on each commercial passenger aircraft operated under the provisions of part 121 of title 14, Code of Fed- eral Regulations.’’ Pub. L. 115–254, div. B, title III, § 336, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3281, provided that: ‘‘(a) SHORT TITLE.—This section may be cited as the ‘Saracini Aviation Safety Act of 2018’. ‘‘(b) REQUIREMENT.—Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 5, 2018], the Ad- ministrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall issue an order requiring installation of a sec- ondary cockpit barrier on each new aircraft that is manufactured for delivery to a passenger air carrier in the United States operating under the provisions of part 121 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations.’’ SEXUAL MISCONDUCT ONBOARD AIRCRAFT Pub. L. 115–254, div. B, title III, §§ 339A, 339B, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3282, 3283, provided that: ‘‘SEC. 339A. NATIONAL IN-FLIGHT SEXUAL MIS- CONDUCT TASK FORCE. ‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT OF TASK FORCE.—The Secretary of Transportation shall establish a task force, to be known as the ‘National In-Flight Sexual Misconduct Task Force’ (referred to in this section as ‘Task Force’) to— ‘‘(1) review current practices, protocols and require- ments of air carriers in responding to allegations of sexual misconduct by passengers onboard aircraft, in- cluding training, reporting and data collection; and ‘‘(2) provide recommendations on training, report- ing and data collection regarding allegations of sex- ual misconduct occurring on passenger airline flights that are informed by the review of information de- scribed in paragraph (1) and subsection (c)(5) on pas- sengers who have experienced sexual misconduct on- board aircraft. ‘‘(b) MEMBERSHIP.—The Task Force shall be composed of, at a minimum, representatives from— ‘‘(1) [the] Department of Transportation; ‘‘(2) [the] Department of Justice, including the Fed- eral Bureau of Investigation, Office of Victims for Page 1460 TITLE 49—TRANSPORTATION § 44903 Crimes [sic], and the Office on Violence Against Women; ‘‘(3) National organizations that specialize in pro- viding services to sexual assault victims; ‘‘(4) labor organizations that represent flight at- tendants; ‘‘(5) labor organizations that represent pilots; ‘‘(6) airports; ‘‘(7) air carriers; ‘‘(8) State and local law enforcement agencies; and ‘‘(9) such other Federal agencies and stakeholder organizations as the Secretary of Transportation con- siders appropriate. ‘‘(c) PURPOSE OF TASK FORCE.—The purpose of the Task Force shall be to— ‘‘(1) issue recommendations for addressing allega- tions of sexual misconduct by passengers onboard air- craft, including airline employee and contractor training; ‘‘(2) issue recommendations on effective ways for passengers involved in incidents of alleged sexual misconduct to report such allegation of sexual mis- conduct; ‘‘(3) issue recommendations on how to most effec- tively provide data on instances of alleged sexual misconduct onboard aircraft and to whom the data collected should be reported in a manner that pro- tects the privacy and confidentiality of individuals involved in incidents of alleged sexual misconduct and precludes the release of data that publically iden- tifies an individual air carrier to enable better under- standing of the frequency and severity of such mis- conduct; ‘‘(4) issue recommendations for flight attendants, pilots, and other appropriate airline personnel on law enforcement notification in incidents of alleged sex- ual misconduct; ‘‘(5) review and utilize first-hand accounts from passengers who have experienced sexual misconduct onboard aircraft; and ‘‘(6) other matters deemed necessary by the Task Force. ‘‘(d) REPORT.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 5, 2018], the Task Force shall submit a report with its recommendations and findings developed pursuant to subsection (c) to the Secretary of Transportation. ‘‘(e) PLAN.—Not later than 180 days after receiving the report required under subsection (d)[,] the Sec- retary of Transportation, in coordination with relevant federal agencies, shall submit to [the] appropriate com- mittees of Congress [Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Rep- resentatives] a plan to address the recommendations in the report required under subsection (d). The Secretary of Transportation shall make changes to guidance, policies and regulations, as necessary, within 1 year of submitting the plan required in this subsection. ‘‘(f) REGULATIONS.—Not later than 1 year after sub- mitting the plan required in this subsection [probably means ‘‘subsection (e)’’], the Secretary of Transpor- tation may issue regulations as deemed necessary to require each air carrier and other covered entity to de- velop a policy concerning sexual misconduct in accord- ance with the recommendations and findings of the Task Force under subsection (c). ‘‘(g) SUNSET.—The Task Force established pursuant to subsection (a) shall terminate upon the submission of the report pursuant to subsection (d). ‘‘SEC. 339B. REPORTING PROCESS FOR SEXUAL MISCONDUCT ONBOARD AIRCRAFT. ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than two years after the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 5, 2018], the At- torney General, in coordination with relevant Federal agencies, shall establish a streamlined process, based on the plan required under section 339A(e) of this Act, for individuals involved in incidents of alleged sexual misconduct onboard aircraft to report such allegations of sexual misconduct to law enforcement in a manner that protects the privacy and confidentiality of indi- viduals involved in such allegations. ‘‘(b) AVAILABILITY OF REPORTING PROCESS.—The proc- ess for reporting established under subsection (a) shall be made available to the public on the primary Inter- net websites of— ‘‘(1) the Office for Victims of Crime and the Office on Violence Against Women of the Department of Justice; ‘‘(2) the Federal Bureau of Investigation; and ‘‘(3) the Department of Transportation.’’ EMPLOYEE ASSAULT PREVENTION AND RESPONSE PLANS Pub. L. 115–254, div. B, title V, § 551, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3378, as amended by Pub. L. 118–63, title IV, § 434(b), May 16, 2024, 138 Stat. 1174, provided that: ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 5, 2018], each air carrier operating under part 121 of title 14, Code of Fed- eral Regulations (in this section referred to as a ‘part 121 air carrier’), shall submit to the Administrator [of the Federal Aviation Administration] for review and acceptance an Employee Assault Prevention and Re- sponse Plan related to the customer service agents of the air carrier and that is developed in consultation with the labor union representing such agents. ‘‘(b) CONTENTS OF PLAN.—An Employee Assault Pre- vention and Response Plan submitted under subsection (a) shall include the following: ‘‘(1) Reporting protocols for air carrier customer service agents who have been the victim of a verbal or physical assault. ‘‘(2) Protocols for the immediate notification of law enforcement after an incident of verbal or physical assault committed against an air carrier customer service agent. ‘‘(3) Protocols for informing Federal law enforce- ment with respect to violations of section 46503 of title 49, United States Code. ‘‘(4) Protocols for ensuring that a passenger in- volved in a violent incident with a customer service agent of an air carrier is not allowed to move through airport security or board an aircraft until appro- priate law enforcement has had an opportunity to as- sess the incident and take appropriate action. ‘‘(5) Protocols for air carriers to inform passengers of Federal laws protecting Federal, airport, and air carrier employees who have security duties within an airport. ‘‘(c) EMPLOYEE TRAINING.—A part 121 air carrier shall conduct initial and recurrent training for all employ- ees, including management, of the air carrier with re- spect to the plan required under subsection (a), which shall include training on de-escalating hostile situa- tions, written protocols on dealing with hostile situa- tions, and the reporting of relevant incidents. ‘‘(d) STUDY.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall— ‘‘(1) complete a study of crimes of violence (as de- fined in section 16 of title 18, United States Code) committed against airline customer service rep- resentatives while they are performing their duties and on airport property; and ‘‘(2) submit the findings of the study, including any recommendations, to the appropriate committees of Congress [Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives]. ‘‘(e) GAP ANALYSIS.—The study required under sub- section (d) shall include a gap analysis to determine if State and local laws and resources are adequate to deter or otherwise address the crimes of violence de- scribed in subsection (a) and recommendations on how to address any identified gaps. ‘‘(f) BRIEFING TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this subsection [May 16, 2024], the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Ad- Page 1461 TITLE 49—TRANSPORTATION § 44903 ministration shall provide to the appropriate commit- tees of Congress [Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Rep- resentatives] a briefing on the Employee Assault Pre- vention and Response Plan submitted by each air car- rier pursuant to this section.’’ TRANSPORTATION SECURITY LABORATORY Pub. L. 115–254, div. K, title I, § 1915, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3555, provided that: ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 5, 2018], the Sec- retary [of Homeland Security], in consultation with the Administrator [of the Transporation Security Adminis- tration] and the Undersecretary for Science and Tech- nology— ‘‘(1) shall conduct a review to determine whether the TSA [Transportation Security Administration] is the most appropriate component within the Depart- ment [of Homeland Security] to administer the Transportation Security Laboratory; and ‘‘(2) may direct the TSA to administer the Trans- portation Security Laboratory if the review under paragraph (1) identifies the TSA as the most appro- priate component. ‘‘(b) PERIODIC REVIEWS.—The Secretary shall periodi- cally review the screening technology test and evalua- tion process conducted at the Transportation Security Laboratory to improve the coordination, collaboration, and communication between the Transportation Secu- rity Laboratory and the TSA to identify factors con- tributing to acquisition inefficiencies, develop strate- gies to reduce acquisition inefficiencies, facilitate more expeditious initiation and completion of testing, and identify how laboratory practices can better support acquisition decisions. ‘‘(c) REPORTS.—The Secretary shall report the find- ings of each review under this section to the appro- priate committees of Congress [Committees on Com- merce, Science, and Transportation and Homeland Se- curity and Governmental Affairs of the Senate and Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Rep- resentatives].’’ PILOT PROGRAM FOR AUTOMATED EXIT LANE TECHNOLOGY Pub. L. 115–254, div. K, title I, § 1920, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3560, provided that: ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 5, 2018], the Admin- istrator [of the Transportation Security Administra- tion] shall establish a pilot program to implement and evaluate the use of automated exit lane technology at small hub airports and nonhub airports (as those terms are defined in section 40102 of title 49, United States Code). ‘‘(b) PARTNERSHIP.—The Administrator shall carry out the pilot program in partnership with the applica- ble airport directors. ‘‘(c) COST SHARE.—The Federal share of the cost of the pilot program under this section shall not exceed 85 percent of the total cost of the program. ‘‘(d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is au- thorized to be appropriated to carry out the pilot pro- gram under this section $15,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2019 through 2021. ‘‘(e) GAO REPORT.—Not later than 2 years after the date the pilot program is implemented, the Comp- troller General of the United States shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress [Committees on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate and Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Rep- resentatives] a report on the pilot program, including— ‘‘(1) the extent of airport participation in the pilot program and how the program was implemented; ‘‘(2) the results of the pilot program and any re- ported benefits, including the impact on security and any cost-related efficiencies realized by TSA [Trans- portation Security Administration] or at the partici- pating airports; and ‘‘(3) the feasibility of expanding the pilot program to additional airports, including to medium and large hub airports.’’ SECURING AIRPORT WORKER ACCESS POINTS Pub. L. 115–254, div. K, title I, § 1934, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3572, provided that: ‘‘(a) COOPERATIVE EFFORTS TO ENHANCE AIRPORT SE- CURITY AWARENESS.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 5, 2018], the Admin- istrator shall consult with air carriers, foreign air car- riers, airport operators, and labor unions representing credentialed employees to enhance security awareness of credentialed airport populations regarding insider threats to aviation security and best practices related to airport access controls. ‘‘(b) CREDENTIALING STANDARDS.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Ad- ministrator, in consultation with air carriers, foreign air carriers, airport operators, and labor unions rep- resenting credentialed employees, shall assess credentialing standards, policies, and practices, includ- ing implementation of relevant credentialing updates required under the FAA Extension, Safety, and Secu- rity Act of 2016 (Public Law 114–190; 130 Stat. 615) [see Tables for classification], to ensure that insider threats to aviation security are adequately addressed. ‘‘(c) SIDA APPLICATIONS.— ‘‘(1) SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS REQUIRED.— ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall revise the application submitted by an indi- vidual applying for a credential granting access to the Secure Identification Area of an airport to re- quire the social security number of such individual in order to strengthen security vetting effective- ness. ‘‘(B) FAILURE TO PROVIDE NUMBER.—An applicant who does not provide such applicant’s social secu- rity number may be denied such a credential. ‘‘(2) SCREENING NOTICE.—The Administrator shall issue requirements for an airport operator to include in each application for access to a Security Identi- fication Display Area notification to the applicant that an employee holding a credential granting ac- cess to a Security Identification Display Area may be screened at any time while gaining access to, work- ing in, or leaving a Security Identification Display Area. ‘‘(d) SECURED AND STERILE AREAS OF AIRPORTS.—The Administrator shall consult with airport operators and airline operators to identify advanced technologies, in- cluding biometric identification technologies, that could be used for securing employee access to the se- cured areas and sterile areas of airports. ‘‘(e) RAP BACK VETTING .—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Adminis- trator shall identify and submit to the appropriate committees of Congress the number of credentialed aviation worker populations at airports that are con- tinuously vetted through the Federal Bureau of Inves- tigation’s Rap Back Service, consistent with section 3405(b)(2) of the FAA Extension, Safety, and Security Act of 2016 (49 U.S.C. 44901 note). ‘‘(f) INSIDER THREAT EDUCATION AND MITIGATION.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall identify means of enhanc- ing the TSA’s ability to leverage the resources of the Department and the intelligence community (as de- fined in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003)) to educate Administration personnel on insider threats to aviation security and how the TSA can better mitigate such insider threats. ‘‘(g) EMPLOYEE INSPECTIONS.—Consistent with the FAA Extension, Safety, and Security Act of 2016 (Pub- lic Law 114–190; 130 Stat. 615), the Administrator shall ensure that TSA-led, random employee physical inspec- Page 1462 TITLE 49—TRANSPORTATION § 44903 tion efforts of aviation workers are targeted, strategic, and focused on providing the greatest level of security effectiveness. ‘‘(h) COVERT TESTING.— ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Consistent with the FAA Exten- sion, Safety, and Security Act of 2016 (Public Law 114–190; 130 Stat. 615), the Administrator shall con- tinue to conduct covert testing of TSA-led employee inspection operations at airports and measure exist- ing levels of security effectiveness. ‘‘(2) REQUIREMENTS.—The Administrator shall pro- vide— ‘‘(A) the results of such testing to— ‘‘(i) the airport operator for the airport that is the subject of any such testing; and ‘‘(ii) as appropriate, to air carriers and foreign air carriers that operate at the airport that is the subject of such testing; and ‘‘(B) recommendations and technical assistance for air carriers, foreign air carriers, and airport op- erators to conduct their own employee inspections, as needed. ‘‘(3) ANNUAL REPORTING.—The Administrator shall for each of fiscal years 2019 through 2021, submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the frequency, methodology, strategy, and effective- ness of employee inspection operations at airports. ‘‘(i) CENTRALIZED DATABASE.— ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 5, 2018], the Ad- ministrator, in consultation with ASAC, shall— ‘‘(A) subject to paragraph (2), establish a na- tional, centralized database of the names of each individual who— ‘‘(i) has had an airport-issued badge revoked for failure to comply with aviation security require- ments; or ‘‘(ii) has had an aircraft operator-issued badge revoked for failure to comply with aviation secu- rity requirements; ‘‘(B) determine the appropriate reporting mecha- nisms for air carriers, foreign air carriers, and air- port operators— ‘‘(i) to submit to the Administration data re- garding an individual described in subparagraph (A); and ‘‘(ii) to access the database; and ‘‘(C) establish a process to allow an individual whose name is mistakenly entered into the data- base to correct the record and have the individual’s name expunged from the database. ‘‘(2) LIMITATION.—The database shall not include the name of any individual whose badge has been re- voked as a result of a termination or cessation of em- ployment unrelated to— ‘‘(A) a violation of a security requirement; or ‘‘(B) a determination that the individual poses a threat to aviation security.’’ [For definitions of terms used in section 1934 of Pub. L. 115–254, set out above, see section 1902 of Pub. L. 115–254, set out as a Definitions of Terms in Title I of Div. K of Pub. L. 115–254 note under section 101 of this title.] LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER REIMBURSEMENT PROGRAM Pub. L. 115–254, div. K, title I, § 1935, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3574, provided that: ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—In accordance with section 44903(c)(1) of title 49, United States Code, the Adminis- trator [of the Transportation Security Administration] shall increase the number of awards, and the total funding amount of each award, under the Law Enforce- ment Officer Reimbursement Program— ‘‘(1) to increase the presence of law enforcement of- ficers in the public areas of airports, including bag- gage claim, ticket counters, and nearby roads; ‘‘(2) to increase the presence of law enforcement of- ficers at screening checkpoints; ‘‘(3) to reduce the response times of law enforce- ment officers during security incidents; and ‘‘(4) to provide visible deterrents to potential ter- rorists. ‘‘(b) COOPERATION BY ADMINISTRATOR.—In carrying out subsection (a), the Administrator shall use the au- thority provided to the Administrator under section 114(m) of title 49, United States Code, that is the same authority as is provided to the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration under section 106(m) of that title. ‘‘(c) ADMINISTRATIVE BURDENS.—The Administrator shall review the regulations and compliance policies re- lated to the Law Enforcement Officer Reimbursement Program and, if necessary, revise such regulations and policies to reduce any administrative burdens on appli- cants or recipients of such awards. ‘‘(d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is au- thorized to be appropriated to carry out section 44901(h) of title 49, United States Code, $55,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2019 through 2021.’’ AIRPORT PERIMETER AND ACCESS CONTROL SECURITY Pub. L. 115–254, div. K, title I, § 1936, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3575, provided that: ‘‘(a) RISK ASSESSMENTS OF AIRPORT SECURITY.— ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator [of the Trans- portation Security Administration] shall— ‘‘(A) not later than 180 days after the date of en- actment of this Act [Oct. 5, 2018], update the Trans- portation Sector Security Risk Assessment (re- ferred to in this section as the ‘TSSRA’); and ‘‘(B) not later than 90 days after the date the TSSRA is updated under subparagraph (A)— ‘‘(i) update with the most currently available intelligence information the Comprehensive Risk Assessment of Perimeter and Access Control Se- curity (referred to in this section as the ‘Risk As- sessment of Airport Security’); ‘‘(ii) establish a regular schedule for periodic updates to the Risk Assessment of Airport Secu- rity; and ‘‘(iii) conduct a system-wide assessment of air- port access control points and airport perimeter security. ‘‘(2) CONTENTS.—The security risk assessments re- quired under paragraph (1)(B) shall— ‘‘(A) include updates reflected in the TSSRA and Joint Vulnerability Assessment findings; ‘‘(B) reflect changes to the risk environment re- lating to airport access control points and airport perimeters; ‘‘(C) use security event data for specific analysis of system-wide trends related to airport access con- trol points and airport perimeter security to better inform risk management decisions; and ‘‘(D) consider the unique geography of and cur- rent best practices used by airports to mitigate po- tential vulnerabilities. ‘‘(3) REPORT.—The Administrator shall report the results of the TSSRA and Risk Assessment of Airport Security under paragraph (1) to— ‘‘(A) the appropriate committees of Congress [Committees on Commerce, Science, and Transpor- tation and Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate and Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives]; ‘‘(B) relevant Federal departments and agencies; and ‘‘(C) airport operators. ‘‘(b) AIRPORT SECURITY STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT.— ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall update the 2012 National Strategy for Airport Perimeter and Access Control Security (referred to in this section as the ‘National Strategy’). ‘‘(2) CONTENTS.—The update to the National Strat- egy shall include— ‘‘(A) information from the Risk Assessment of Airport Security; and ‘‘(B) information on— ‘‘(i) airport security-related activities; Page 1463 TITLE 49—TRANSPORTATION § 44903 ‘‘(ii) the status of TSA [Transportation Secu- rity Administration] efforts to address the objec- tives of the National Strategy; ‘‘(iii) finalized outcome-based performance measures and performance levels for— ‘‘(I) each activity described in clause (i); and ‘‘(II) each objective described in clause (ii); and ‘‘(iv) input from airport operators. ‘‘(3) UPDATES.—Not later than 90 days after the date the update to the National Strategy is complete, the Administrator shall establish a regular schedule for determining if and when additional updates to the strategy under paragraph (1) are necessary.’’ TRAVELER REDRESS IMPROVEMENT Pub. L. 115–254, div. K, title I, § 1949, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3588, provided that: ‘‘(a) REDRESS PROCESS.— ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 5, 2018], the Ad- ministrator [of the Transportation Security Adminis- tration], using existing resources, systems, and proc- esses, shall ensure the availability of the Department of Homeland Security Traveler Redress Inquiry Pro- gram (referred to in this section as ‘DHS TRIP’) re- dress process to adjudicate an inquiry for an indi- vidual who— ‘‘(A) is a citizen of the United States or alien law- fully admitted for permanent residence; ‘‘(B) has filed the inquiry with DHS TRIP after receiving enhanced screening at an airport pas- senger security checkpoint more than 3 times in any 60-day period; and ‘‘(C) believes the individual has been wrongly identified as being a threat to aviation security. ‘‘(2) BRIEFING.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall brief the appropriate committees of Congress [Committees on Commerce, Science, and Transpor- tation and Homeland Security and Governmental Af- fairs of the Senate and Committee on Homeland Se- curity of the House of Representatives] on the imple- mentation of the redress process required under para- graph (1). ‘‘(b) PRIVACY IMPACT REVIEW AND UPDATE.— ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall review and update the Privacy Impact Assess- ment for the Secure Flight programs to ensure the assessment accurately reflects the operation of such programs. ‘‘(2) PUBLIC DISSEMINATION; FORM.—The Adminis- trator shall— ‘‘(A) publish the Secure Flight Privacy Impact Assessment review and update required under para- graph (1) on a publicly-accessible internet webpage of the TSA [Transportation Security Administra- tion]; and ‘‘(B) submit the Secure Flight Privacy Impact As- sessment review and update to the appropriate committees of Congress. ‘‘(c) RULE REVIEW AND NOTIFICATION PROCESS.— ‘‘(1) RULE REVIEW.—Not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of this Act, and every 120 days thereafter, the Assistant Administrator of the Office of Intelligence and Analysis of the TSA, in coordina- tion with the entities specified in paragraph (3), shall identify and review the screening rules established by the Office of Intelligence and Analysis of [the] TSA. ‘‘(2) NOTIFICATION PROCESS.—Not later than 2 days after the date that any change to a rule identified under paragraph (1) is made, the Assistant Adminis- trator of the Office of Intelligence and Analysis of the TSA shall notify the entities specified in paragraph (3) of the change. ‘‘(3) ENTITIES SPECIFIED.—The entities specified in this paragraph are as follows: ‘‘(A) The Office of Civil Rights and Liberties, Om- budsman, and Traveler Engagement of the TSA. ‘‘(B) The Office of Civil Rights and Liberties of the Department [of Homeland Security]. ‘‘(C) The Office of Chief Counsel of the TSA. ‘‘(D) The Office of General Counsel of the Depart- ment. ‘‘(E) The Privacy Office of the Administration. ‘‘(F) The Privacy Office of the Department. ‘‘(G) The Federal Air Marshal Service. ‘‘(H) The Traveler Redress Inquiry Program of the Department. ‘‘(d) FEDERAL AIR MARSHAL SERVICE COORDINATION.— ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator shall ensure that the rules identified in subsection (c) are taken into account for Federal Air Marshal mission sched- uling. ‘‘(2) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 5, 2018], the Adminis- trator shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on whether, and if so how, the rules identified in subsection (c) are incorporated in the risk analysis conducted during the Federal Air Mar- shal mission scheduling process. ‘‘(e) GAO REPORT.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall— ‘‘(1) study the rules identified under subsection (c)(1), including— ‘‘(A) whether the rules are effective in mitigating potential threats to aviation security; and ‘‘(B) whether, and if so how, the TSA coordinates with the Department regarding any proposed change to a rule; and ‘‘(2) submit to the appropriate committees of Con- gress a report on the findings under paragraph (1), in- cluding any recommendations.’’ GENERAL AVIATION AIRPORTS Pub. L. 115–254, div. K, title I, § 1952, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3592, provided that: ‘‘(a) SHORT TITLE.—This section may be cited as the ‘Securing General Aviation and Charter Air Carrier Service Act’. ‘‘(b) ADVANCED PASSENGER PRESCREENING SYSTEM.— Not later than 120 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 5, 2018], the Administrator shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the status of the deployment of the advanced passenger prescreening system, and access thereto for certain air- craft charter operators, as required by section 44903(j)(2)(E) of title 49, United States Code, including— ‘‘(1) the reasons for the delay in deploying the sys- tem; and ‘‘(2) a detailed schedule of actions necessary for the deployment of the system. ‘‘(c) SCREENING SERVICES OTHER THAN IN PRIMARY PASSENGER TERMINALS.— ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to the provisions of this subsection, the Administrator may provide screening services to a charter air carrier in an area other than the primary passenger terminal of an applicable air- port. ‘‘(2) REQUESTS.—A request for screening services under paragraph (1) shall be made at such time, in such form, and in such manner as the Administrator may require, except that the request shall be made to the Federal Security Director for the applicable air- port at which the screening services are requested. ‘‘(3) AVAILABILITY.—A Federal Security Director may provide requested screening services under this section if the Federal Security Director determines such screening services are available. ‘‘(4) AGREEMENTS.— ‘‘(A) LIMITATION.—No screening services may be provided under this section unless a charter air car- rier agrees in writing to compensate the TSA for all reasonable costs, including overtime, of providing the screening services. ‘‘(B) PAYMENTS.—Notwithstanding section 3302 of title 31, United States Code, payment received under subparagraph (A) shall be credited to the ac- Page 1464 TITLE 49—TRANSPORTATION § 44903 count that was used to cover the cost of providing the screening services. Amounts so credited shall be merged with amounts in that account, and shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as other amounts in that account. ‘‘(5) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection: ‘‘(A) APPLICABLE AIRPORT.—The term ‘applicable airport’ means an airport that— ‘‘(i) is not a commercial service airport; and ‘‘(ii) is receiving screening services for sched- uled passenger aircraft. ‘‘(B) CHARTER AIR CARRIER.—The term ‘charter air carrier’ has the meaning given the term in section 40102 of title 49, United States Code. ‘‘(C) SCREENING SERVICES.—The term ‘screening services’ means the screening of passengers and property similar to the screening of passengers and property described in section 44901 of title 49, United States Code. ‘‘(d) REPORT.—Not later than 120 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator, in con- sultation with the ASAC, shall, consistent with the re- quirements of paragraphs (6) and (7) of section 44946(b) of title 49, United States Code, submit to the appro- priate Committees of Congress an implementation plan, including an implementation schedule, for any of the following recommendations that were adopted by the ASAC and with which the Administrator has con- curred before the date of the enactment of this Act: ‘‘(1) The recommendation regarding general avia- tion access to Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport, as adopted on February 17, 2015. ‘‘(2) The recommendation regarding the vetting of persons seeking flight training in the United States, as adopted on July 28, 2016. ‘‘(3) Any other such recommendations relevant to the security of general aviation adopted before the date of the enactment of this Act. ‘‘(e) DESIGNATED STAFFING.—The Administrator may designate 1 or more full-time employees of the TSA to liaise with, and respond to issues raised by, general aviation stakeholders. ‘‘(f) SECURITY ENHANCEMENTS.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Adminis- trator, in consultation with the ASAC, shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the feasibility of requiring a security threat assessment be- fore an individual could obtain training from a private flight school to operate an aircraft having a maximum certificated takeoff weight of more than 12,500 pounds.’’ [For definitions of terms used in section 1952 of Pub. L. 115–254, set out above, see section 1902 of Pub. L. 115–254, set out as a Definitions of Terms in Title I of Div. K of Pub. L. 115–254 note under section 101 of this title.] FLIGHT DECK SAFETY AND SECURITY Pub. L. 115–254, div. K, title I, § 1961, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3600, provided that: ‘‘(a) THREAT ASSESSMENT.—Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 5, 2018], the Administrator [of the Transportation Security Ad- ministration], in consultation with the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration, shall complete a detailed threat assessment to identify any safety or security risks associated with unauthorized access to the flight decks on commercial aircraft and any appro- priate measures that should be taken based on the risks. ‘‘(b) RTCA REPORT.—The Administrator, in coordina- tion with the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration, shall disseminate RTCA Document (DO–329) Aircraft Secondary Barriers and Alternative Flight Deck Security Procedure to aviation stake- holders, including air carriers and flight crew, to con- vey effective methods and best practices to protect the flight deck.’’ AVIATION CYBERSECURITY Pub. L. 115–254, div. B, title V, § 509, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3355, provided that: ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 5, 2018], the Admin- istrator [of the Federal Aviation Administration] shall initiate a review of the comprehensive and strategic framework of principles and policies (referred to in this section as the ‘framework’) developed pursuant to sec- tion 2111 of the FAA Extension, Safety, and Security Act of 2016 [Pub. L. 114–190] (49 U.S.C. 44903 note) [set out below]. ‘‘(b) CONTENTS.—In undertaking the review under sub- section (a), the Administrator shall— ‘‘(1) assess the degree to which the framework iden- tifies and addresses known cybersecurity risks associ- ated with the aviation system; ‘‘(2) review existing short- and long-term objectives for addressing cybersecurity risks to the national air- space system; and ‘‘(3) assess the [Federal Aviation] Administration’s level of engagement and coordination with aviation stakeholders and other appropriate agencies, organi- zations, or groups with which the Administration consults to carry out the framework. ‘‘(c) UPDATES.—Upon completion of the review under subsection (a), the Administrator shall modify the framework, as appropriate, to address any deficiencies identified by the review. ‘‘(d) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 180 days after initiating the review required by subsection (a), the Administrator shall submit to the appropriate com- mittees of Congress [Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Rep- resentatives] a report on the results of the review, in- cluding a description of any modifications made to the framework.’’ Pub. L. 114–190, title II, § 2111, July 15, 2016, 130 Stat. 625, provided that: ‘‘(a) COMPREHENSIVE AND STRATEGIC AVIATION FRAME- WORK.— ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 240 days after the date of enactment of this Act [July 15, 2016], the Ad- ministrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall facilitate and support the development of a comprehensive and strategic framework of principles and policies to reduce cybersecurity risks to the na- tional airspace system, civil aviation, and agency in- formation systems using a total systems approach that takes into consideration the interactions and interdependence of different components of aircraft systems and the national airspace system. ‘‘(2) SCOPE.—In carrying out paragraph (1), the Ad- ministrator shall— ‘‘(A) identify and address the cybersecurity risks associated with— ‘‘(i) the modernization of the national airspace system; ‘‘(ii) the automation of aircraft, equipment, and technology; and ‘‘(iii) aircraft systems, including by— ‘‘(I) directing the Aircraft Systems Informa- tion Security Protection Working Group— ‘‘(aa) to assess cybersecurity risks to air- craft systems; ‘‘(bb) to review the extent to which existing rulemaking, policy, and guidance to promote safety also promote aircraft systems informa- tion security protection; and ‘‘(cc) to provide appropriate recommenda- tions to the Administrator if separate or addi- tional rulemaking, policy, or guidance is needed to address cybersecurity risks to air- craft systems; and ‘‘(II) identifying and addressing— ‘‘(aa) cybersecurity risks associated with in- flight entertainment systems; and ‘‘(bb) whether in-flight entertainment sys- tems can and should be isolated and separate, such as through an air gap, under existing rulemaking, policy, and guidance; ‘‘(B) clarify cybersecurity roles and responsibil- ities of offices and employees of the Federal Avia- Page 1465 TITLE 49—TRANSPORTATION § 44903 tion Administration, as the roles and responsibil- ities relate to cybersecurity at the Federal Avia- tion Administration; ‘‘(C) identify and implement objectives and ac- tions to reduce cybersecurity risks to air traffic control information systems, including actions to improve implementation of information security standards, such as those of the National Institute of Standards and Technology; ‘‘(D) support voluntary efforts by industry, RTCA, Inc., and other standards-setting organiza- tions to develop and identify consensus standards and best practices relating to guidance on aviation systems information security protection, con- sistent, to the extent appropriate, with the cybersecurity risk management activities described in section 2(e) of the National Institute of Stand- ards and Technology Act (15 U.S.C. 272(e)); ‘‘(E) establish guidelines for the voluntary ex- change of information between and among aviation stakeholders pertaining to aviation-related cybersecurity incidents, threats, and vulnerabilities; ‘‘(F) identify short- and long-term objectives and actions that can be taken in response to cybersecurity risks to the national airspace sys- tem; and ‘‘(G) identify research and development activities to inform actions in response to cybersecurity risks. ‘‘(3) IMPLEMENTATION REQUIREMENTS.—In carrying out the activities under this subsection, the Adminis- trator shall— ‘‘(A) coordinate with aviation stakeholders, in- cluding, at a minimum, representatives of industry, airlines, manufacturers, airports, RTCA, Inc., and unions; ‘‘(B) consult with the heads of relevant agencies and with international regulatory authorities; ‘‘(C) if determined appropriate, convene an expert panel or working group to identify and address cybersecurity risks; and ‘‘(D) evaluate, on a periodic basis, the effective- ness of the principles established under this sub- section. ‘‘(b) UPDATE ON CYBERSECURITY IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS.—Not later than 90 days after the date of en- actment of this Act [July 15, 2016], the Administrator shall provide to the appropriate committees of Con- gress [Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transpor- tation of the Senate and Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives] an update on progress made toward the implementation of this section. ‘‘(c) CYBERSECURITY THREAT MODEL.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Ad- ministrator, in consultation with the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, shall implement the open recommendation issued in 2015 by the Government Accountability Office to assess and re- search the potential cost and timetable of developing and maintaining an agencywide threat model, which shall be updated regularly, to strengthen the cybersecurity of agency systems across the Federal Aviation Administration. The Administrator shall brief the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate on the status, results, and composition of the threat model. ‘‘(d) NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECH- NOLOGY INFORMATION SECURITY STANDARDS.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administra- tion, after consultation with the Director of the Na- tional Institute of Standards and Technology, shall transmit to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report on— ‘‘(1) a cybersecurity standards plan to improve im- plementation of the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s latest revisions to information se- curity guidance for Federal Aviation Administration information and Federal Aviation Administration in- formation systems within set timeframes; and ‘‘(2) an explanation of why any such revisions are not incorporated in the plan or are not incorporated within set timeframes. ‘‘(e) CYBERSECURITY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT.— Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator, in consultation with other agencies as appropriate, shall establish a cybersecurity research and development plan for the national air- space system, including— ‘‘(1) any proposal for research and development co- operation with international partners; ‘‘(2) an evaluation and determination of research and development needs to determine any cybersecurity risks of cabin communications and cabin information technology systems on board in the passenger domain; and ‘‘(3) objectives, proposed tasks, milestones, and a 5- year budgetary profile.’’ AIRPORT SECURITY Pub. L. 114–50, Sept. 24, 2015, 129 Stat. 490, provided that: ‘‘SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. ‘‘This Act may be cited as the ‘Gerardo Hernandez Airport Security Act of 2015’. ‘‘SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. ‘‘In this Act: ‘‘(1) ASSISTANT SECRETARY.—The term ‘Assistant Secretary’ means the Assistant Secretary of Home- land Security (Transportation Security) of the De- partment of Homeland Security. ‘‘(2) ADMINISTRATION.—The term ‘Administration’ means the Transportation Security Administration. ‘‘SEC. 3. SECURITY INCIDENT RESPONSE AT AIR- PORTS. ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Assistant Secretary shall, in consultation with other Federal agencies as appro- priate, conduct outreach to all airports in the United States at which the Administration performs, or over- sees the implementation and performance of, security measures, and provide technical assistance as nec- essary, to verify such airports have in place individual- ized working plans for responding to security incidents inside the perimeter of the airport, including active shooters, acts of terrorism, and incidents that target passenger-screening checkpoints. ‘‘(b) TYPES OF PLANS.—Such plans may include, but may not be limited to, the following: ‘‘(1) A strategy for evacuating and providing care to persons inside the perimeter of the airport, with con- sideration given to the needs of persons with disabil- ities. ‘‘(2) A plan for establishing a unified command, in- cluding identification of staging areas for non-air- port-specific law enforcement and fire response. ‘‘(3) A schedule for regular testing of communica- tions equipment used to receive emergency calls. ‘‘(4) An evaluation of how emergency calls placed by persons inside the perimeter of the airport will reach airport police in an expeditious manner. ‘‘(5) A practiced method and plan to communicate with travelers and all other persons inside the perim- eter of the airport. ‘‘(6) To the extent practicable, a projected max- imum timeframe for law enforcement response to ac- tive shooters, acts of terrorism, and incidents that target passenger security-screening checkpoints. ‘‘(7) A schedule of joint exercises and training to be conducted by the airport, the Administration, other stakeholders such as airport and airline tenants, and Page 1466 TITLE 49—TRANSPORTATION § 44903 any relevant law enforcement, airport police, fire, and medical personnel. ‘‘(8) A schedule for producing after-action joint ex- ercise reports to identify and determine how to im- prove security incident response capabilities. ‘‘(9) A strategy, where feasible, for providing air- port law enforcement with access to airport security video surveillance systems at category X airports where those systems were purchased and installed using Administration funds. ‘‘(c) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [Sept. 24, 2015], the Assistant Secretary shall report to the Com- mittee on Homeland Security of the House of Rep- resentatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate on the findings from its outreach to airports under subsection (a), including an analysis of the level of preparedness such airports have to respond to security incidents, including active shooters, acts of terrorism, and incidents that target passenger-screening checkpoints. ‘‘SEC. 4. DISSEMINATING INFORMATION ON BEST PRACTICES. ‘‘The Assistant Secretary shall— ‘‘(1) identify best practices that exist across air- ports for security incident planning, management, and training; and ‘‘(2) establish a mechanism through which to share such best practices with other airport operators na- tionwide. ‘‘SEC. 5. CERTIFICATION. ‘‘Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Sept. 24, 2015], and annually thereafter, the Assistant Secretary shall certify in writing to the Com- mittee on Homeland Security of the House of Rep- resentatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate that all screening personnel have participated in practical training exer- cises for active shooter scenarios. ‘‘SEC. 6. REIMBURSABLE AGREEMENTS. ‘‘Not later than 90 days after the enactment of this Act [Sept. 24, 2015], the Assistant Secretary shall pro- vide to the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Com- merce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate an analysis of how the Administration can use cost sav- ings achieved through efficiencies to increase over the next 5 fiscal years the funding available for checkpoint screening law enforcement support reimbursable agree- ments. ‘‘SEC. 7. SECURITY INCIDENT RESPONSE FOR SUR- FACE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS. ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Assistant Secretary shall, in consultation with the Secretary of Transportation, and other relevant agencies, conduct outreach to all pas- senger transportation agencies and providers with high-risk facilities, as identified by the Assistant Sec- retary, to verify such agencies and providers have in place plans to respond to active shooters, acts of ter- rorism, or other security-related incidents that target passengers. ‘‘(b) TYPES OF PLANS.—As applicable, such plans may include, but may not be limited to, the following: ‘‘(1) A strategy for evacuating and providing care to individuals, with consideration given to the needs of persons with disabilities. ‘‘(2) A plan for establishing a unified command. ‘‘(3) A plan for frontline employees to receive active shooter training. ‘‘(4) A schedule for regular testing of communica- tions equipment used to receive emergency calls. ‘‘(5) An evaluation of how emergency calls placed by individuals using the transportation system will reach police in an expeditious manner. ‘‘(6) A practiced method and plan to communicate with individuals using the transportation system. ‘‘(c) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Sept. 24, 2015], the Assistant Secretary shall report to the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Trans- portation of the Senate on the findings from its out- reach to the agencies and providers under subsection (a), including an analysis of the level of preparedness such transportation systems have to respond to secu- rity incidents. ‘‘(d) DISSEMINATION OF BEST PRACTICES.—The Assist- ant Secretary shall identify best practices for security incident planning, management, and training and es- tablish a mechanism through which to share such prac- tices with passenger transportation agencies nation- wide. ‘‘SEC. 8. NO ADDITIONAL AUTHORIZATION OF AP- PROPRIATIONS. ‘‘No additional funds are authorized to be appro- priated to carry out this Act, and this Act shall be car- ried out using amounts otherwise available for such purpose. ‘‘SEC. 9. INTEROPERABILITY REVIEW. ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Sept. 24, 2015], the As- sistant Secretary shall, in consultation with the As- sistant Secretary of the Office of Cybersecurity and Communications, conduct a review of the interoperable communications capabilities of the law enforcement, fire, and medical personnel responsible for responding to a security incident, including active shooter events, acts of terrorism, and incidents that target passenger- screening checkpoints, at all airports in the United States at which the Administration performs, or over- sees the implementation and performance of, security measures. ‘‘(b) REPORT.—Not later than 30 days after the com- pletion of the review, the Assistant Secretary shall re- port the findings of the review to the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transpor- tation of the Senate.’’ CABIN FLIGHT CREW PARTICIPATION IN KNOWN CREWMEMBER PILOT PROGRAM Pub. L. 113–6, div. D, title II, Mar. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 349, provided in part: ‘‘That the Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration shall, within 270 days of the date of enactment of this Act [Mar. 26, 2013], establish procedures allowing members of cabin flight crews of air carriers to participate in the Known Crewmember pilot program, unless the Administrator determines that meeting the requirement within this timeline is not practicable and informs the Committees on Appropriations of the Senate and House of Rep- resentatives of the basis for that determination and the new timeline for implementing the requirement’’. STRATEGIC PLAN TO TEST AND IMPLEMENT ADVANCED PASSENGER PRESCREENING SYSTEM Pub. L. 110–53, title XVI, § 1605, Aug. 3, 2007, 121 Stat. 481, provided that: ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 120 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Aug. 3, 2007], the Sec- retary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Administrator of the Transportation Security Adminis- tration, shall submit to the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives, the Com- mittee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate, and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate a plan that— ‘‘(1) describes the system to be utilized by the De- partment of Homeland Security to assume the per- formance of comparing passenger information, as de- fined by the Administrator, to the automatic selectee and no-fly lists, utilizing appropriate records in the consolidated and integrated terrorist watchlist main- tained by the Federal Government; ‘‘(2) provides a projected timeline for each phase of testing and implementation of the system; Page 1467 TITLE 49—TRANSPORTATION § 44903 ‘‘(3) explains how the system will be integrated with the prescreening system for passengers on inter- national flights; and ‘‘(4) describes how the system complies with section 552a of title 5, United States Code. ‘‘(b) GAO ASSESSMENT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller Gen- eral shall submit a report to the Committee on Com- merce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives that— ‘‘(1) describes the progress made by the Transpor- tation Security Administration in implementing the secure flight passenger pre-screening program; ‘‘(2) describes the effectiveness of the current ap- peals process for passengers wrongly assigned to the no-fly and terrorist watch lists; ‘‘(3) describes the Transportation Security Admin- istration’s plan to protect private passenger informa- tion and progress made in integrating the system with the pre-screening program for international flights operated by United States Customs and Bor- der Protection; ‘‘(4) provides a realistic determination of when the system will be completed; and ‘‘(5) includes any other relevant observations or recommendations the Comptroller General deems ap- propriate.’’ PILOT PROJECT TO TEST DIFFERENT TECHNOLOGIES AT AIRPORT EXIT LANES Pub. L. 110–53, title XVI, § 1613, Aug. 3, 2007, 121 Stat. 485, provided that: ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator of the Trans- portation Security Administration shall conduct a pilot program at not more than 2 airports to identify technologies to improve security at airport exit lanes. ‘‘(b) PROGRAM COMPONENTS.—In conducting the pilot program under this section, the Administrator shall— ‘‘(1) utilize different technologies that protect the integrity of the airport exit lanes from unauthorized entry; ‘‘(2) work with airport officials to deploy such tech- nologies in multiple configurations at a selected air- port or airports at which some of the exits are not co- located with a screening checkpoint; and ‘‘(3) ensure the level of security is at or above the level of existing security at the airport or airports where the pilot program is conducted. ‘‘(c) REPORTS.— ‘‘(1) INITIAL BRIEFING.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Aug. 3, 2007], the Administrator shall conduct a briefing to the con- gressional committees set forth in paragraph (3) that describes— ‘‘(A) the airport or airports selected to partici- pate in the pilot program; ‘‘(B) the technologies to be tested; ‘‘(C) the potential savings from implementing the technologies at selected airport exits; ‘‘(D) the types of configurations expected to be deployed at such airports; and ‘‘(E) the expected financial contribution from each airport. ‘‘(2) FINAL REPORT.—Not later than 18 months after the technologies are deployed at the airports partici- pating in the pilot program, the Administrator shall submit a final report to the congressional commit- tees set forth in paragraph (3) that describes— ‘‘(A) the changes in security procedures and tech- nologies deployed; ‘‘(B) the estimated cost savings at the airport or airports that participated in the pilot program; and ‘‘(C) the efficacy and staffing benefits of the pilot program and its applicability to other airports in the United States. ‘‘(3) CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES.—The reports re- quired under this subsection shall be submitted to— ‘‘(A) the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate; ‘‘(B) the Committee on Appropriations of the Sen- ate; ‘‘(C) the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate; ‘‘(D) the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives; and ‘‘(E) the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives. ‘‘(d) USE OF EXISTING FUNDS.—This section shall be executed using existing funds.’’ SECURITY CREDENTIALS FOR AIRLINE CREWS Pub. L. 110–53, title XVI, § 1614, Aug. 3, 2007, 121 Stat. 486, provided that: ‘‘(a) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Aug. 3, 2007], the Adminis- trator of the Transportation Security Administration, after consultation with airline, airport, and flight crew representatives, shall submit to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate, the Committee on Homeland Security and Govern- mental Affairs of the Senate, the Committee on Home- land Security of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a report on the status of the Administration’s efforts to institute a sterile area ac- cess system or method that will enhance security by properly identifying authorized airline flight deck and cabin crew members at screening checkpoints and granting them expedited access through screening checkpoints. The Administrator shall include in the re- port recommendations on the feasibility of imple- menting the system for the domestic aviation industry beginning 1 year after the date on which the report is submitted. ‘‘(b) BEGINNING IMPLEMENTATION.—The Administrator shall begin implementation of the system or method referred to in subsection (a) not later than 1 year after the date on which the Administrator submits the re- port under subsection (a).’’ CAPPS2 Pub. L. 108–176, title VI, § 607, Dec. 12, 2003, 117 Stat. 2568, provided that: ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Under Secretary for Border and Transportation Security of the Department of Homeland Security shall not implement, on other than a test basis, the computer assisted passenger prescreening system (commonly known as and in this section referred to as ‘CAPPS2’) until the Under Sec- retary provides to Congress a certification that— ‘‘(1) a procedure is established enabling airline pas- sengers, who are delayed or prohibited from boarding a flight because CAPPS2 determined that they might pose a security threat, to appeal such determination and correct information contained in CAPPS2; ‘‘(2) the error rate of the Government and private data bases that will be used to both establish identity and assign a risk level to a passenger under CAPPS2 will not produce a large number of false positives that will result in a significant number of passengers being mistaken as a security threat; ‘‘(3) the Under Secretary has demonstrated the effi- cacy and accuracy of all search tools in CAPPS2 and has demonstrated that CAPPS2 can make an accu- rate predictive assessment of those passengers who would constitute a security threat; ‘‘(4) the Secretary of Homeland Security has estab- lished an internal oversight board to oversee and monitor the manner in which CAPPS2 is being imple- mented; ‘‘(5) the Under Secretary has built in sufficient operational safeguards to reduce the opportunities for abuse; ‘‘(6) substantial security measures are in place to protect CAPPS2 from unauthorized access by hackers or other intruders; ‘‘(7) the Under Secretary has adopted policies estab- lishing effective oversight of the use and operation of the system; and Page 1468 TITLE 49—TRANSPORTATION § 44903 ‘‘(8) there are no specific privacy concerns with the technological architecture of the system. ‘‘(b) GAO REPORT.—Not later than 90 days after the date on which certification is provided under sub- section (a), the Comptroller General shall submit a re- port to the Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate, the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Rep- resentatives, and the Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation of the Senate that assesses the im- pact of CAPPS2 on the issues listed in subsection (a) and on privacy and civil liberties. The report shall in- clude any recommendations for practices, procedures, regulations, or legislation to eliminate or minimize ad- verse effect of CAPPS2 on privacy, discrimination, and other civil liberties.’’ REIMBURSEMENT OF AIR CARRIERS FOR CERTAIN SCREENING AND RELATED ACTIVITIES Pub. L. 108–176, title VIII, § 821, Dec. 12, 2003, 117 Stat. 2594, provided that: ‘‘The Secretary of Homeland Secu- rity, subject to the availability of funds (other than amounts in the Aviation Trust Fund) provided for this purpose, shall reimburse air carriers and airports for— ‘‘(1) the screening of catering supplies; and ‘‘(2) checking documents at security checkpoints.’’ IMPROVED FLIGHT DECK INTEGRITY MEASURES Pub. L. 107–71, title I, § 104, Nov. 19, 2001, 115 Stat. 605, provided that: ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—As soon as possible after the date of enactment of this Act [Nov. 19, 2001], the Adminis- trator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall— ‘‘(1) issue an order (without regard to the provisions of chapter 5 of title 5, United States Code)— ‘‘(A) prohibiting access to the flight deck of air- craft engaged in passenger air transportation or intrastate air transportation that are required to have a door between the passenger and pilot com- partments under title 14, Code of Federal Regula- tions, except to authorized persons; ‘‘(B) requiring the strengthening of the flight deck door and locks on any such aircraft operating in air transportation or intrastate air transpor- tation that has a rigid door in a bulkhead between the flight deck and the passenger area to ensure that the door cannot be forced open from the pas- senger compartment; ‘‘(C) requiring that such flight deck doors remain locked while any such aircraft is in flight except when necessary to permit access and egress by au- thorized persons; and ‘‘(D) prohibiting the possession of a key to any such flight deck door by any member of the flight crew who is not assigned to the flight deck; and ‘‘(2) take such other action, including modification of safety and security procedures and flight deck re- design, as may be necessary to ensure the safety and security of the aircraft. ‘‘(b) IMPLEMENTATION OF OTHER METHODS.—As soon as possible after such date of enactment [Nov. 19, 2001], the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administra- tion may develop and implement methods— ‘‘(1) to use video monitors or other devices to alert pilots in the flight deck to activity in the cabin, ex- cept that the use of such monitors or devices shall be subject to nondisclosure requirements applicable to cockpit video recordings under section 1114(c) [of title 49]; ‘‘(2) to ensure continuous operation of an aircraft transponder in the event of an emergency; and ‘‘(3) to revise the procedures by which cabin crews of aircraft can notify flight deck crews of security breaches and other emergencies, including providing for the installation of switches or other devices or methods in an aircraft cabin to enable flight crews to discreetly notify the pilots in the case of a security breach occurring in the cabin. ‘‘(c) COMMUTER AIRCRAFT.—The Administrator shall investigate means of securing the flight deck of sched- uled passenger aircraft operating in air transportation or intrastate air transportation that do not have a rigid fixed door with a lock between the passenger com- partment and the flight deck and issue such an order as the Administrator deems appropriate to ensure the in- accessibility, to the greatest extent feasible, of the flight deck while the aircraft is so operating, taking into consideration such aircraft operating in regions where there is minimal threat to aviation security or national security.’’ SMALL AND MEDIUM AIRPORTS Pub. L. 107–71, title I, § 106(b), Nov. 19, 2001, 115 Stat. 609, provided that: ‘‘(1) TECHNICAL SUPPORT AND FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE.— The Under Secretary of Transportation for Security [now Administrator of the Transportation Security Ad- ministration] shall develop a plan to— ‘‘(A) provide technical support to airports, each of which had less than 1 percent of the total annual enplanements in the United States for the most re- cent calendar year for which data is available, to en- hance security operations; and ‘‘(B) provide financial assistance to those airports to defray the costs of enhancing security. ‘‘(2) REMOVAL OF CERTAIN RESTRICTIONS.— ‘‘(A) CERTIFICATION BY OPERATOR.—If the operator of an airport described in paragraph (1), after con- sultation with the appropriate State and local law enforcement authorities, determines that safeguards are in place to sufficiently protect public safety, and so certifies in writing to the Under Secretary, then any security rule, order, or other directive restricting the parking of passenger vehicles shall not apply at that airport after the applicable time period specified in subparagraph (B), unless the Under Secretary, tak- ing into account individual airport circumstances, notifies the airport operator that the safeguards in place do not adequately respond to specific security risks and that the restriction must be continued in order to ensure public safety. ‘‘(B) COUNTERMAND PERIOD.—The time period within which the Secretary may notify an airport operator, after receiving a certification under subparagraph (A), that a restriction must be continued in order to ensure public safety at the airport is— ‘‘(i) 15 days for a nonhub airport (as defined in section 41714(h) of title 49, United States Code); ‘‘(ii) 30 days for a small hub airport (as defined in such section); ‘‘(iii) 60 days for a medium hub airport (as defined in such section); and ‘‘(iv) 120 days for an airport that had at least 1 percent of the total annual enplanements in the United States for the most recent calendar year for which data is available.’’ AIRPORT SECURITY AWARENESS PROGRAMS Pub. L. 107–71, title I, § 106(e), Nov. 19, 2001, 115 Stat. 610, provided that: ‘‘The Under Secretary of Transpor- tation for Security [now Administrator of the Trans- portation Security Administration] shall require sched- uled passenger air carriers, and airports in the United States described in section 44903(c) [of title 49] to de- velop security awareness programs for airport employ- ees, ground crews, gate, ticket, and curbside agents of the air carriers, and other individuals employed at such airports.’’ AIRLINE COMPUTER RESERVATION SYSTEMS Pub. L. 107–71, title I, § 117, Nov. 19, 2001, 115 Stat. 624, provided that: ‘‘In order to ensure that all airline com- puter reservation systems maintained by United States air carriers are secure from unauthorized access by per- sons seeking information on reservations, passenger manifests, or other nonpublic information, the Sec- retary of Transportation shall require all such air car- riers to utilize to the maximum extent practicable the best technology available to secure their computer res- ervation system against such unauthorized access.’’ Page 1469 TITLE 49—TRANSPORTATION § 44903 AUTHORIZATION OF FUNDS FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF AIRPORTS FOR SECURITY MANDATES Pub. L. 107–71, title I, § 121, Nov. 19, 2001, 115 Stat. 630, provided that: ‘‘(a) AIRPORT SECURITY.—There is authorized to be ap- propriated to the Secretary of Transportation for fiscal years 2002 and 2003 a total of $1,500,000,000 to reimburse airport operators, on-airport parking lots, and vendors of on-airfield direct services to air carriers for direct costs incurred by such operators to comply with new, additional, or revised security requirements imposed on such operators by the Federal Aviation Administra- tion or Transportation Security Administration on or after September 11, 2001. Such sums shall remain avail- able until expended. ‘‘(b) DOCUMENTATION OF COSTS; AUDIT.—The Secretary may not reimburse an airport operator, on-airport parking lot, or vendor of on-airfield direct services to air carriers under this section for any cost for which the airport operator, on-airport parking lot, or vendor of on-airfield direct services does not demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Secretary, using sworn financial statements or other appropriate data, that— ‘‘(1) the cost is eligible for reimbursement under subsection (a); and ‘‘(2) the cost was incurred by the airport operator, on-airport parking lot, or vendor of on-airfield direct services to air carriers. The Inspector General of the Department of Transpor- tation and the Comptroller General of the United States may audit such statements and may request any other information necessary to conduct such an audit. ‘‘(c) CLAIM PROCEDURE.—Within 30 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Nov. 19, 2001], the Secretary, after consultation with airport operators, on-airport parking lots, and vendors of on-airfield direct services to air carriers, shall publish in the Federal Register the procedures for filing claims for reimbursement under this section of eligible costs incurred by airport opera- tors.’’ FLIGHT DECK SECURITY Pub. L. 107–71, title I, § 128, Nov. 19, 2001, 115 Stat. 633, which authorized the pilot of a passenger aircraft to carry a firearm into the cockpit if approved by the Under Secretary of Transportation for Security and the air carrier, if the firearm is approved by the Under Sec- retary, and if the pilot has received proper training, was repealed by Pub. L. 107–296, title XIV, § 1402(b)(2), Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2305. CHARTER AIR CARRIERS Pub. L. 107–71, title I, § 132(a), Nov. 19, 2001, 115 Stat. 635, which provided that within 90 days after Nov. 19, 2001, the Under Secretary of Transportation for Secu- rity was to implement an aviation security program for charter air carriers with a maximum certificated take- off weight of 12,500 pounds or more, was repealed by Pub. L. 108–176, title VI, § 606(b), Dec. 12, 2003, 117 Stat. 2568. PHYSICAL SECURITY FOR ATC FACILITIES Pub. L. 106–528, § 5, Nov. 22, 2000, 114 Stat. 2521, pro- vided that: ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—In order to ensure physical secu- rity at Federal Aviation Administration staffed facili- ties that house air traffic control systems, the Admin- istrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall act immediately to— ‘‘(1) correct physical security weaknesses at air traffic control facilities so the facilities can be grant- ed physical security accreditation not later than April 30, 2004; and ‘‘(2) ensure that follow-up inspections are con- ducted, deficiencies are promptly corrected, and ac- creditation is kept current for all air traffic control facilities. ‘‘(b) REPORTS.—Not later than April 30, 2001, and an- nually thereafter through April 30, 2004, the Adminis- trator shall transmit to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a report on the progress being made in improving the physical security of air traffic control facilities, including the percentage of such fa- cilities that have been granted physical security ac- creditation.’’ DEPUTIZING OF STATE AND LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS Pub. L. 106–181, title V, § 512, Apr. 5, 2000, 114 Stat. 142, provided that: ‘‘(a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section, the following defi- nitions apply: ‘‘(1) AIRCRAFT.—The term ‘aircraft’ has the mean- ing given that term in section 40102 of title 49, United States Code. ‘‘(2) AIR TRANSPORTATION.—The term ‘air transpor- tation’ has the meaning given that term in such sec- tion. ‘‘(3) PROGRAM.—The term ‘program’ means the pro- gram established under subsection (b)(1)(A). ‘‘(b) ESTABLISHMENT OF A PROGRAM TO DEPUTIZE LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS.— ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Attorney General may— ‘‘(A) establish a program under which the Attor- ney General may deputize State and local law en- forcement officers having jurisdiction over airports and airport authorities as Deputy United States Marshals for the limited purpose of enforcing Fed- eral laws that regulate security on board aircraft, including laws relating to violent, abusive, or dis- ruptive behavior by passengers in air transpor- tation; and ‘‘(B) encourage the participation of law enforce- ment officers of State and local governments in the program. ‘‘(2) CONSULTATION.—In establishing the program, the Attorney General shall consult with appropriate officials of— ‘‘(A) the United States Government (including the Administrator [of the Federal Aviation Admin- istration] or a designated representative of the Ad- ministrator); and ‘‘(B) State and local governments in any geo- graphic area in which the program may operate. ‘‘(3) TRAINING AND BACKGROUND OF LAW ENFORCE- MENT OFFICERS.— ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Under the program, to qualify to serve as a Deputy United States Marshal under the program, a State or local law enforcement offi- cer shall— ‘‘(i) meet the minimum background and train- ing requirements for a law enforcement officer under part 107 of title 14, Code of Federal Regula- tions (or equivalent requirements established by the Attorney General); and ‘‘(ii) receive approval to participate in the pro- gram from the State or local law enforcement agency that is the employer of that law enforce- ment officer. ‘‘(B) TRAINING NOT FEDERAL RESPONSIBILITY.—The United States Government shall not be responsible for providing to a State or local law enforcement officer the training required to meet the training requirements under subparagraph (A)(i). Nothing in this subsection may be construed to grant any such law enforcement officer the right to attend any in- stitution of the United States Government estab- lished to provide training to law enforcement offi- cers of the United States Government. ‘‘(c) POWERS AND STATUS OF DEPUTIZED LAW ENFORCE- MENT OFFICERS.— ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2), a State or local law enforcement officer that is deputized as a Deputy United States Marshal under the program may arrest and apprehend an individual suspected of violating any Federal law described in subsection (b)(1)(A), including any individual who violates a pro- Page 1470 TITLE 49—TRANSPORTATION § 44904 vision subject to a civil penalty under section 46301 of title 49, United States Code, or section 46302, 46303, 46318, 46504, 46505, or 46507 of that title, or who com- mits an act described in section 46506 of that title. ‘‘(2) LIMITATION.—The powers granted to a State or local law enforcement officer deputized under the program shall be limited to enforcing Federal laws relating to security on board aircraft in flight. ‘‘(3) STATUS.—A State or local law enforcement offi- cer that is deputized as a Deputy United States Mar- shal under the program shall not— ‘‘(A) be considered to be an employee of the United States Government; or ‘‘(B) receive compensation from the United States Government by reason of service as a Deputy United States Marshal under the program. ‘‘(d) STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this sec- tion may be construed to— ‘‘(1) grant a State or local law enforcement officer that is deputized under the program the power to en- force any Federal law that is not described in sub- section (c); or ‘‘(2) limit the authority that a State or local law enforcement officer may otherwise exercise in the of- ficer’s capacity under any other applicable State or Federal law. ‘‘(e) REGULATIONS.—The Attorney General may pro- mulgate such regulations as may be necessary to carry out this section. ‘‘(f) NOTIFICATION OF CONGRESS.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [Apr. 5, 2000], the Attorney General shall notify the Com- mittee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Com- merce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate on whether or not the Attorney General intends to estab- lish the program authorized by this section.’’ DEVELOPMENT OF AVIATION SECURITY LIAISON AGREEMENT Pub. L. 104–264, title III, § 309, Oct. 9, 1996, 110 Stat. 3253, which related to an interagency agreement pro- viding for the establishment of an aviation security li- aison at existing appropriate Federal agencies’ field of- fices in or near cities served by a designated high-risk airport, was repealed by Pub. L. 118–63, title II, § 218(g), May 16, 2024, 138 Stat. 1056. DEFINITIONS OF TERMS IN PUB. L. 107–71 For definitions of terms used in sections 104, 106(b), (e), 117, 121, 128, and 132(a) of Pub. L. 107–71, set out above, see section 133 of Pub. L. 107–71, set out as a note under section 40102 of this title. § 44904. Domestic air transportation system secu- rity (a) ASSESSING THREATS.—The Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration and the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investiga- tion jointly shall assess current and potential threats to the domestic air transportation sys- tem. The assessment shall include consideration of the extent to which there are individuals with the capability and intent to carry out terrorist or related unlawful acts against that system and the ways in which those individuals might carry out those acts. The Administrator of the Trans- portation Security Administration and the Di- rector jointly shall decide on and carry out the most effective method for continuous analysis and monitoring of security threats to that sys- tem. (b) ASSESSING SECURITY.—In coordination with the Director, the Administrator of the Transpor- tation Security Administration shall carry out periodic threat and vulnerability assessments on security at each airport that is part of the do- mestic air transportation system. Each assess- ment shall include consideration of— (1) the adequacy of security procedures re- lated to the handling and transportation of checked baggage and cargo; (2) space requirements for security personnel and equipment; (3) separation of screened and unscreened passengers, baggage, and cargo; (4) separation of the controlled and uncon- trolled areas of airport facilities; and (5) coordination of the activities of security personnel of the Transportation Security Ad- ministration, the United States Customs Serv- ice, the Immigration and Naturalization Serv- ice, and air carriers, and of other law enforce- ment personnel. (c) MODAL SECURITY PLAN FOR AVIATION.—In addition to the requirements set forth in sub- paragraphs (B) through (F) of section 114(s)(3), the modal security plan for aviation prepared under section 114(s) shall— (1) establish a damage mitigation and recov- ery plan for the aviation system in the event of a terrorist attack; and (2) include a threat matrix document that outlines each threat to the United States civil aviation system and the corresponding layers of security in place to address such threat. (d) OPERATIONAL CRITERIA.—The Adminis- trator of the Transportation Security Adminis- tration shall issue operational criteria to pro- tect airport infrastructure and operations against the threats identified in the plans pre- pared under section 114(s)(1) and shall approve best practices guidelines for airport assets. (e) IMPROVING SECURITY.—The Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration shall take necessary actions to improve domes- tic air transportation security by correcting any deficiencies in that security discovered in the assessments, analyses, and monitoring carried out under this section. (Pub. L. 103–272, § 1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1207; Pub. L. 107–71, title I, § 101(f)(1), (7), (9), Nov. 19, 2001, 115 Stat. 603; Pub. L. 108–458, title IV, § 4001(b), Dec. 17, 2004, 118 Stat. 3712; Pub. L. 115–254, div. K, title I, § 1991(d)(4), Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3632.) HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES Revised Section Source (U.S. Code) Source (Statutes at Large) 44904(a) ...... 49 App.:1357 (note). Nov. 16, 1990, Pub. L. 101–604, § 106(a), (b), 104 Stat. 3075. 44904(b) ...... 49 App.:1357 (note). Nov. 16, 1990, Pub. L. 101–604, § 106(c), 104 Stat. 3075. 44904(c) ...... 49 App.:1357 (note). Nov. 16, 1990, Pub. L. 101–604, § 106(e), 104 Stat. 3075. In subsection (a), the words ‘‘domestic air transpor- tation system’’ are substituted for ‘‘domestic aviation system’’ for consistency in this section. In subsection (b), before clause (1), the word ‘‘Direc- tor’’ is substituted for ‘‘Federal Bureau of Investiga- tion’’ because of 28:532. In clauses (1) and (3), the word ‘‘mail’’ is omitted as being included in ‘‘cargo’’. In subsection (c), the word ‘‘correcting’’ is sub- stituted for ‘‘remedying’’ for clarity.