Arkansas Legal Resource Navigator

28 U.S.C. § 113 — North Carolina

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

28 U.S.C. § 113 — North Carolina

Page 45 TITLE 28—JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE § 113 within its district, may pretermit the regular session of court at Hempstead until Federal quarters and accom- modations are available and ready for occupancy, ex- cept that for the entire period and such pretermission, a special session of the court shall be held at Westbury. Pretermission may be ordered without regard to the provisions of section 140(a) of title 28, United States Code. ‘‘SEC. 3. Notwithstanding the provisions of section 142 of title 28, United States Code, the Administrator of General Services, at the request of the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, shall continue to provide existing quarters and accom- modations at Westbury for the duration of the special session held pursuant to section 2 of this Act. Appro- priations to the judicial branch of Government shall be available to the Director to make necessary disburse- ments for such quarters and accommodations, and to pay user charges as required by section 210 of the Fed- eral Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949, as amended (40 U.S.C. 490) [see now 40 U.S.C. 586, 587], at rates otherwise authorized by law. ‘‘SEC. 4. Notwithstanding the provisions of section 456 of title 28, United States Code, any judge, and any offi- cer or employee of the judicial branch, whose official station is, on the day before the date of enactment of this Act [Apr. 28, 1978], Westbury, may maintain that official station for the duration of the special session held pursuant to section 2 of this Act. ‘‘SEC. 5. The Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts may pay travel and transpor- tation expenses in accordance with subchapter II, chap- ter 57 of title 5, United States Code, to

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 28 U.S.C. § 113

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.

Original supplied file — preserved unchanged

Download original Markdown file

File SHA-256: b7b683dfdb88e7bbc59122db1714e7e1a4844bb4564fc9bd2c9ec852d2cb25cb. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.

Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.

Open the recorded source website ↗

Record provenance

Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-6502a1e61f068b7af10281ae
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-28/section-113-north-carolina--ee0322c80b.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 8b3c09afcb9d07ce18f6119ccdf8b989a98c3b9ab8bf09173072bcf7001dae36

Source location: USCODE-2024-title28-partI-chap5-sec113.pdf

Stored source content

Page 45 TITLE 28—JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE § 113 within its district, may pretermit the regular session of court at Hempstead until Federal quarters and accom- modations are available and ready for occupancy, ex- cept that for the entire period and such pretermission, a special session of the court shall be held at Westbury. Pretermission may be ordered without regard to the provisions of section 140(a) of title 28, United States Code. ‘‘SEC. 3. Notwithstanding the provisions of section 142 of title 28, United States Code, the Administrator of General Services, at the request of the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, shall continue to provide existing quarters and accom- modations at Westbury for the duration of the special session held pursuant to section 2 of this Act. Appro- priations to the judicial branch of Government shall be available to the Director to make necessary disburse- ments for such quarters and accommodations, and to pay user charges as required by section 210 of the Fed- eral Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949, as amended (40 U.S.C. 490) [see now 40 U.S.C. 586, 587], at rates otherwise authorized by law. ‘‘SEC. 4. Notwithstanding the provisions of section 456 of title 28, United States Code, any judge, and any offi- cer or employee of the judicial branch, whose official station is, on the day before the date of enactment of this Act [Apr. 28, 1978], Westbury, may maintain that official station for the duration of the special session held pursuant to section 2 of this Act. ‘‘SEC. 5. The Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts may pay travel and transpor- tation expenses in accordance with subchapter II, chap- ter 57 of title 5, United States Code, to any officer or employee of the judicial branch whose official station changes as a consequence of this Act [enacting this pro- vision and amending subsec. (c) of this section] and who relocates his residence incident to such change of offi- cial station.’’ § 113. North Carolina North Carolina is divided into three judicial districts to be known as the Eastern, Middle, and Western Districts of North Carolina. Eastern District (a) The Eastern District comprises the coun- ties of Beaufort, Bertie, Bladen, Brunswick, Camden, Carteret, Chowan, Columbus, Craven, Cumberland, Currituck, Dare, Duplin, Edgecombe, Franklin, Gates, Granville, Greene, Halifax, Harnett, Hertford, Hyde, Johnston, Jones, Lenoir, Martin, Nash, New Hanover, Northampton, Onslow, Pamlico, Pasquotank, Pender, Perquimans, Pitt, Robeson, Sampson, Tyrrell, Vance, Wake, Warren, Washington, Wayne, Wilson, those portions of Hoke, Moore, Scotland, and Richmond counties encompassing the Fort Bragg Military Reservation and Camp Mackall, and that portion of Durham County en- compassing the Federal Correctional Institu- tion, Butner, North Carolina. Court for the Eastern District shall be held at Elizabeth City, Fayetteville, Green- ville, New Bern, Raleigh, Wilmington, and Wilson. Middle District (b) MIDDLE DISTRICT.—The Middle District comprises the counties of Alamance, Cabarrus, Caswell, Chatham, Davidson, Davie, Durham (excluding that portion of Durham County en- compassing the Federal Correctional Institu- tion, Butner, North Carolina), Forsyth, Guilford, Hoke (excluding that portion of Hoke County encompassing the Fort Bragg Military Reserva- tion and Camp Mackall), Lee, Montgomery, Moore (excluding that portion of Moore County encompassing the Fort Bragg Military Reserva- tion and Camp Mackall), Orange, Person, Ran- dolph, Richmond (excluding that portion of Richmond County encompassing the Fort Bragg Military Reservation and Camp Mackall), Rock- ingham, Rowan, Scotland (excluding that por- tion of Scotland County encompassing the Fort Bragg Military Reservation and Camp Mackall), Stanly, Stokes, Surry, and Yadkin. Court for the Middle District shall be held at Durham, Greensboro, and Winston- Salem. Western District (c) The Western District comprises the coun- ties of Alexander, Alleghany, Anson, Ashe, Avery, Buncombe, Burke, Caldwell, Catawba, Cherokee, Clay, Cleveland, Gaston, Graham, Haywood, Henderson, Iredell, Jackson, Lincoln, McDowell, Macon, Madison, Mecklenburg, Mitchell, Polk, Rutherford, Swain, Transyl- vania, Union, Watauga, Wilkes, and Yancey. Court for the Western District shall be held at Asheville, Bryson City, Charlotte, Shelby, and Statesville. (June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 886; Pub. L. 89–319, Nov. 2, 1965, 79 Stat. 1186; Pub. L. 96–462, § 5(a)–(c), Oct. 15, 1980, 94 Stat. 2053, 2054; Pub. L. 102–272, Apr. 21, 1992, 106 Stat. 112; Pub. L. 117–26, § 1(a), July 6, 2021, 135 Stat. 299.) HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., § 179 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, § 98, 36 Stat. 1120; Oct. 7, 1914, ch. 318, 38 Stat. 728; Mar. 17, 1920, ch. 101, § 1, 41 Stat. 531; June 7, 1924, ch. 359, § 1, 43 Stat. 661; Dec. 24, 1924, ch. 18, 43 Stat. 721; June 12, 1926, ch. 566, 44 Stat. 734; June 22, 1926, ch. 645, 44 Stat. 758; June 22, 1926, ch. 646, 44 Stat. 758; Mar. 2, 1927, ch. 276, 44 Stat. 1339; Apr. 25, 1928, ch. 432, 45 Stat. 457; May 10, 1928, ch. 516, 45 Stat. 495; Feb. 20, 1933, ch. 107, 47 Stat. 859; Feb. 28, 1933, ch. 133, 47 Stat. 1350; June 28, 1935, ch. 330, §§ 1, 2, 49 Stat. 429; June 24, 1936, ch. 744, 49 Stat. 1898; June 24, 1936, ch. 759, 49 Stat. 1910; Aug. 17, 1937, ch. 688, 50 Stat. 671). References to civil and criminal terms at Raleigh were omitted as more properly the subject of rule of court. The following language at the end of section 179 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., was omitted: ‘‘There shall be a judge appointed for the said middle district in the man- ner now provided by law who shall receive the salary provided by law for the judges of the eastern and west- ern districts, and a district attorney, marshal, clerk, and other officers in the manner and at the salary now provided by law. All causes in the said middle district in equity, bankruptcy, or admiralty, in which orders and decrees have already been made and which are now in process of trial, shall continue and remain subject to the jurisdiction of the judge of that district by whom the same shall have been made and before whom the same shall have been partially tried and determined.’’ The first sentence is superfluous in view of other sec- tions of this title governing the appointment and com- pensation of the judges, clerks and marshals of the dis- trict courts and of district attorneys. The last sentence is obsolete, having been enacted in 1927, and being lim- ited to cases affected by the creation of the middle dis- trict. Provisions for maintenance of offices by the clerks at certain cities were omitted. (See Reviser’s Note under sections 452 and 751 of this title.) Provisions for furnishing rooms and accommodations at Durham, Rockingham, and Winston-Salem were Page 46 TITLE 28—JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE § 114 1 So in original. Probably should be followed by a comma. omitted as obsolete upon advice of the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts that Federal accommodations are now available in such places. The provisions respecting court accommodations at Bryson City and Shelby were omitted as covered by section 142 of this title. Changes in arrangement and phraseology were made. Editorial Notes AMENDMENTS 2021—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 117–26, § 1(a)(1), substituted ‘‘Wilson, those portions of Hoke, Moore, Scotland, and Richmond counties encompassing the Fort Bragg Mili- tary Reservation and Camp Mackall, and’’ for ‘‘and Wilson and’’. Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 117–26, § 1(a)(2), added subsec. (b) and struck out former subsec. (b) which read as follows: ‘‘The Middle District comprises the counties of Alamance, Cabarrus, Caswell, Chatham, Davidson, Davie, Durham (excluding that portion of Durham County encompassing the Federal Correctional Institu- tion, Butner, North Carolina), Forsythe, Guilford, Hoke, Lee, Montgomery, Moore, Orange, Person, Ran- dolph, Richmond, Rockingham, Rowan, Scotland, Stanly, Stokes, Surry, and Yadkin.’’ Amendment di- recting striking out subsec. (b) was executed only to the first paragraph and not the concluding sentence, to reflect the probable intent of Congress. 1992—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 102–272, which directed the amendment of subsec. (a) by striking out ‘‘Clinton,’’ and ‘‘Washington,’’ and inserting ‘‘Greenville,’’ after ‘‘Fayetteville,’’, was executed to the second sentence to reflect the probable intent of Congress. 1980—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 96–462, § 5(a), added that por- tion of Durham County encompassing the Federal Cor- rectional Institution, Butner, North Carolina to the Eastern District. Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 96–462, § 5(b), struck out ref- erences to Alleghany, Ashe, Watauga, and Wilkes coun- ties in the list of counties comprising the Middle Dis- trict; inserted ‘‘(excluding that portion of Durham County encompassing the Federal Correctional Institu- tion, Butner, North Carolina)’’ in first sentence as the probable intent of Congress; and struck out Rocking- ham, Salisbury, and Wilkesboro as places for holding court. Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 96–462, § 5(c), added Alleghany, Ashe, Watauga, and Wilkes counties to the Western District. 1965—Pub. L. 89–319 provided for holding court at Clinton. Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2021 AMENDMENT Pub. L. 117–26, § 1(b), July 6, 2021, 135 Stat. 299, pro- vided that ‘‘The amendments made by subsection (a) [amending this section] shall not apply to any action commenced or pending in any judicial district of North Carolina before the date of enactment of this Act [July 6, 2021].’’ EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1980 AMENDMENT; SAVINGS PROVISIONS Amendment by Pub. L. 96–462 effective Oct. 1, 1981, but not to affect the composition or preclude the serv- ice of any grand or petit juror summoned, empaneled, or actually serving in any judicial district on Oct. 1, 1981, see section 7 of Pub. L. 96–462, set out as a note under section 84 of this title. Pub. L. 96–462, § 5(d), Oct. 15, 1980, 94 Stat. 2054, pro- vided that: ‘‘The amendments made by this section [amending this section] shall not apply to any action commenced before the effective date of such amend- ments [Oct. 1, 1981] and pending in any judicial district of North Carolina on such date.’’ § 114. North Dakota North Dakota constitutes one judicial district. Court shall be held at Bismarck, Fargo, Grand Forks, and Minot. (Added Pub. L. 111–174, § 3, May 27, 2010, 124 Stat. 1216.) Editorial Notes PRIOR PROVISIONS A prior section 114, act June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 886; Pub. L. 95–408, § 3(b), Oct. 2, 1978, 92 Stat. 883, which provided that North Dakota consisted of one judicial district comprising four divisions, was repealed by Pub. L. 111–174, § 3, May 27, 2010, 124 Stat. 1216. § 115. Ohio Ohio is divided into two judicial districts to be known as the Northern and Southern Districts of Ohio. Northern District (a) The Northern District comprises two divi- sions. (1) The Eastern Division comprises the coun- ties of Ashland, Ashtabula, Carroll, Columbiana, Crawford, Cuyahoga, Geauga, Holmes, Lake, Lorain, Mahoning, Medina, Portage, Richland, Stark, Summit, Trumbull, Tuscarawas, and Wayne. Court for the Eastern Division shall be held at Cleveland, Youngstown, and Akron. (2) The Western Division comprises the counties of Allen, Auglaize, Defiance, Erie, Fulton, Hancock, Hardin, Henry, Huron, Lucas, Marion, Mercer, Ottawa, Paulding, Putnam, Sandusky, Seneca, Van Wert, Williams, Woods, and Wyan- dot. Court for the Western Division shall be held at Lima and Toledo. Southern District (b) The Southern District comprises two divi- sions. (1) The Western Division comprises the counties of Adams, Brown, Butler, Champaign, Clark, Clermont, Clinton, Darke, Greene, Hamilton, Highland, Lawrence, Miami, Montgomery, Preble, Scioto, Shelby, and Warren. Court for the Western Division shall be held at Cincinnati and Dayton. (2) The Eastern Division comprises the coun- ties of Athens, Belmont, Coshocton, Delaware, Fairfield, Fayette, Franklin, Gallia, Guernsey, Harrison, Hocking, Jackson, Jefferson, Knox, Licking, Logan, Madison, Meigs, Monroe, Morgan, Morrow, Muskingum, Noble, Perry, Pickaway, Pike, Ross, Union, Vinton, and Washington. Court for the Eastern Division shall be held at Columbus 1 St. Clairsville, and Steu- benville. (June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 887; Feb. 10, 1954, ch. 6, § 2(b)(9), 68 Stat. 11; Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title I, § 11021, Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1829.)

Cross-references

Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

28 U.S.C. § 113 — North Carolina

North Carolina is divided into three judicial districts to be known as the Eastern, Middle, and Western Districts of North Carolina.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 28 U.S.C. § 113

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

40 U.S.C. § 586 — Charges for space and services

**(a) Definition.—** In this section, “space and services” means space, services, quarters, maintenance, repair, and other facilities. **(b) Charges by Administrator of General Services.—** (1) **In general.—** — The Administrator of General Services shall impose a charge for furnishing space and services. (2) **Rates.—** — The Administrator shall, from time to time, determine the rates to be charged for furnishing space and services and shall prescribe regulations providing for the rates. The rates shall approximate commercial charges for comparable space and services. However, for a building for which the Administrator is responsible for alterations only (as the term “alter” is defined in [section 3301(a) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title40-section3301/a&num=0&edition=prelim)), the rates shall be fixed to recover only the approximate cost incurred in providing alterations. (3) **Exemptions.—** — The Administrator may exempt anyone from the charges required by this subsection when the Administrator determines that charges would be infeasible or impractical. To the extent an exemption is granted, appropriations to the General Services Administration are authorized to reimburse the Federal Buildings Fund for any loss of revenue. **(c) Charges by Executive Agencies.—** (1) **In general.—** — An executive agency, other than the Administration, may impose a charge for furnishing space and services at rates approved by the Administrator. (2) **Crediting amounts received.—** — An amount an executive agency receives under this subsection shall be credited to the appropriation or fund initially charged for providing the space or service. However, amounts in excess of actual operating and maintenance costs shall be credited

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 40 U.S.C. § 586

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 40 U.S.C. § 586. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

40 U.S.C. § 586 — Charges for space and services

Page 74 TITLE 40—PUBLIC BUILDINGS, PROPERTY, AND WORKS § 586 mittee on Homeland Security and Governmental Af- fairs of the Senate and the Committee on Transpor- tation and Infrastructure of the House of Representa- tives on the status of the implementation of the plan, including the number of disclosures made under sub- section (b)(2). ‘‘SEC. 5. OTHER SECURITY AGREEMENTS FOR LEASED SPACE. ‘‘A lease agreement between a Federal lessee and a covered entity for the accommodation of a Federal agency in a building or other improvement that will be used for high-security leased space shall include lan- guage that provides that— ‘‘(1) the covered entity and any member of the prop- erty management company who may be responsible for oversight or maintenance of the high-security leased space shall not— ‘‘(A) maintain access to the high-security leased space; or ‘‘(B) have access to the high-security leased space without prior approval from the Federal tenant; ‘‘(2) access to the high-security leased space or any property or information located within that space will only be granted by the Federal tenant if the Fed- eral tenant determines that the access is clearly con- sistent with the mission and responsibilities of the Federal tenant; and ‘‘(3) the Federal lessee shall have written proce- dures in place, signed by the Federal lessee and the covered entity, governing access to the high-security leased space in case of emergencies that may damage the leased property. ‘‘SEC. 6. AGENCY NOTIFICATIONS. ‘‘Not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Dec. 31, 2020], the Administrator of General Services, in consultation with the Office of Manage- ment and Budget, shall provide notification to relevant Executive branch agencies with independent lea

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 40 U.S.C. § 586

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 40 U.S.C. § 586. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.