Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
North Carolina is divided into three judicial districts to be known as the Eastern, Middle, and Western Districts of North Carolina.
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 28 U.S.C. § 113
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: fca6eb7631225a3727c8991b1b181b7af49ca55bb78bcf0ad1959e15c5e30378. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:record_usc_ac68a69af3f170cf1d3e8686
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code/title-28/section-113-north-carolina--5b6a10128f.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 0ee8cbaca60ee2fd3900c3c83c974bb973e25f3179f9301875b898d2e8747fc4
Source location: Title 28, Chapter 5, § 113; chapter-005-district-courts.md
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
California is divided into four judicial districts to be known as the Northern, Eastern, Central, and Southern Districts of California.
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 28 U.S.C. § 84
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
### Statutory Notes Section, acts June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 898; Oct. 9, 1962, Pub. L. 87–764, 76 Stat. 762; Nov. 19, 1977, Pub. L. 95–196, 91 Stat. 1420, related to the providing of accommodations at places for holding court. See [section 462 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title28-section462&num=0&edition=prelim). #### Effective Date of Repeal Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as an Effective Date of 1982 Amendment note under [section 171 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title28-section171&num=0&edition=prelim). #### Waiver of Limitations and Restrictions The limitations and restrictions contained in this section prior to its repeal were waived with respect to the holding of court at certain places by the following Acts: Pub. L. 87–833, Oct. 15, 1962, 76 Stat. 959, related to Akron, Ohio. Pub. L. 87–699, Sept. 25, 1962, 76 Stat. 598, related to Richland, Washington. Pub. L. 87–562, § 4, July 30, 1962, 76 Stat. 248, related to Fort Myers, Saint Petersburg, Fort Pierce, and West Palm Beach, Florida. Pub. L. 87–560, July 27, 1962, 76 Stat. 247, related to Marshall, Texas. Pub. L. 87–559, July 27, 1962, 76 Stat. 246, related to Decatur, Alabama. Pub. L. 87–553, July 27, 1962, 76 Stat. 222, related to Winchester, Tennessee. Pub. L. 87–551, July 27, 1962, 76 Stat. 221, related to Bridgeport, Connecticut. Pub. L. 87–337, Oct. 3, 1961, 75 Stat. 750, related to Lafayette, Louisiana. Pub. L. 87–36, § 3(g), May 19, 1961, 75 Stat. 83, related to Kalamazoo, Michigan; Fayetteville, North Carolina; and Dyersburg, Tennessee. Pub. L. 86–366, Sept. 22, 1959, 73 Stat. 647, related to Durant, Oklahoma. Act July 20, 1956, ch. 657, 70 Stat. 594
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 28 U.S.C. § 142
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a)** For purposes of construing and applying title 5, a judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims shall be deemed to be an “officer” under section 2104(a) of such title. **(b)** (1) (A) For purposes of construing and applying chapter 89 of title 5, a judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims who— (i) is retired under subsection (b) of [section 178 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title28-section178&num=0&edition=prelim), and (ii) at the time of becoming such a retired judge— (I) was enrolled in a health benefits plan under chapter 89 of title 5, but (II) did not satisfy the requirements of [section 8905(b)(1) of title 5](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title5-section8905/b/1&num=0&edition=prelim) (relating to eligibility to continue enrollment as an annuitant), shall be deemed to be an annuitant meeting the requirements of [section 8905(b)(1) of title 5](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title5-section8905/b/1&num=0&edition=prelim), in accordance with the succeeding provisions of this paragraph, if the judge gives timely written notification to the chief judge of the court that the judge is willing to be called upon to perform judicial duties under [section 178(d) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title28-section178/d&num=0&edition=prelim) during the period of continued eligibility for enrollment, as described in subparagraph (B)(ii) or (C)(ii) (whichever applies). (B) Except as provided in subparagraph (C)— (i) in order to be eligible for continued enrollment under this paragraph, notification under subparagraph (A) shall be made before the first day of the open enrollm
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 28 U.S.C. § 179
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 45 TITLE 28—JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE § 113 within its district, may pretermit the regular session of court at Hempstead until Federal quarters and accom- modations are available and ready for occupancy, ex- cept that for the entire period and such pretermission, a special session of the court shall be held at Westbury. Pretermission may be ordered without regard to the provisions of section 140(a) of title 28, United States Code. ‘‘SEC. 3. Notwithstanding the provisions of section 142 of title 28, United States Code, the Administrator of General Services, at the request of the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, shall continue to provide existing quarters and accom- modations at Westbury for the duration of the special session held pursuant to section 2 of this Act. Appro- priations to the judicial branch of Government shall be available to the Director to make necessary disburse- ments for such quarters and accommodations, and to pay user charges as required by section 210 of the Fed- eral Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949, as amended (40 U.S.C. 490) [see now 40 U.S.C. 586, 587], at rates otherwise authorized by law. ‘‘SEC. 4. Notwithstanding the provisions of section 456 of title 28, United States Code, any judge, and any offi- cer or employee of the judicial branch, whose official station is, on the day before the date of enactment of this Act [Apr. 28, 1978], Westbury, may maintain that official station for the duration of the special session held pursuant to section 2 of this Act. ‘‘SEC. 5. The Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts may pay travel and transpor- tation expenses in accordance with subchapter II, chap- ter 57 of title 5, United States Code, to
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 28 U.S.C. § 113
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.