Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
4 U.S.C. § 120 — Procedure if no electronic database pro-
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 17
TITLE 4—FLAG AND SEAL, SEAT OF GOVERNMENT, AND THE STATES
§ 120
(b) JURISDICTION.—All charges for mobile tele-
communications services that are deemed to be
provided by the customer’s home service pro-
vider under sections 116 through 126 of this title
are authorized to be subjected to tax, charge, or
fee by the taxing jurisdictions whose territorial
limits encompass the customer’s place of pri-
mary use, regardless of where the mobile tele-
communication services originate, terminate, or
pass through, and no other taxing jurisdiction
may impose taxes, charges, or fees on charges
for such mobile telecommunications services.
(Added Pub. L. 106–252, § 2(a), July 28, 2000, 114
Stat. 627.)
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT
Section effective July 28, 2000, and applicable only to
customer bills issued after the first day of the first
month beginning more than 2 years after July 28, 2000,
see section 3 of Pub. L. 106–252, set out as a note under
section 116 of this title.
§ 118. Limitations
Sections 116 through 126 of this title do not—
(1) provide authority to a taxing jurisdiction
to impose a tax, charge, or fee that the laws of
such jurisdiction do not authorize such juris-
diction to impose; or
(2) modify, impair, supersede, or authorize
the modification, impairment, or supersession
of the law of any taxing jurisdiction per-
taining to taxation except as expressly pro-
vided in sections 116 through 126 of this title.
(Added Pub. L. 106–252, § 2(a), July 28, 2000, 114
Stat. 627.)
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT
Section effective July 28, 2000, and applicable only to
customer bills issued after the first day of the first
month beginning more t
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 4 U.S.C. § 120
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: b45e2babb332c674257ef7ab77166079d1c46a6de8ac31d8ead6995e2229e396. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-46514f83d3ebaaa51088b4fe
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-4/section-120-procedure-if-no-electronic-database-pro--7f7a6635ec.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 721b3cf6d8881ba9ba799c74730fb1e1fabb5c872ac2358169cce72973a1f628
Source location: USCODE-2024-title4-chap4-sec120.pdf
Stored source content
Page 17
TITLE 4—FLAG AND SEAL, SEAT OF GOVERNMENT, AND THE STATES
§ 120
(b) JURISDICTION.—All charges for mobile tele-
communications services that are deemed to be
provided by the customer’s home service pro-
vider under sections 116 through 126 of this title
are authorized to be subjected to tax, charge, or
fee by the taxing jurisdictions whose territorial
limits encompass the customer’s place of pri-
mary use, regardless of where the mobile tele-
communication services originate, terminate, or
pass through, and no other taxing jurisdiction
may impose taxes, charges, or fees on charges
for such mobile telecommunications services.
(Added Pub. L. 106–252, § 2(a), July 28, 2000, 114
Stat. 627.)
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT
Section effective July 28, 2000, and applicable only to
customer bills issued after the first day of the first
month beginning more than 2 years after July 28, 2000,
see section 3 of Pub. L. 106–252, set out as a note under
section 116 of this title.
§ 118. Limitations
Sections 116 through 126 of this title do not—
(1) provide authority to a taxing jurisdiction
to impose a tax, charge, or fee that the laws of
such jurisdiction do not authorize such juris-
diction to impose; or
(2) modify, impair, supersede, or authorize
the modification, impairment, or supersession
of the law of any taxing jurisdiction per-
taining to taxation except as expressly pro-
vided in sections 116 through 126 of this title.
(Added Pub. L. 106–252, § 2(a), July 28, 2000, 114
Stat. 627.)
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT
Section effective July 28, 2000, and applicable only to
customer bills issued after the first day of the first
month beginning more than 2 years after July 28, 2000,
see section 3 of Pub. L. 106–252, set out as a note under
section 116 of this title.
§ 119. Electronic databases for nationwide stand-
ard numeric jurisdictional codes
(a) ELECTRONIC DATABASE.—
(1) PROVISION
OF
DATABASE.—A State may
provide an electronic database to a home serv-
ice provider or, if a State does not provide
such an electronic database to home service
providers, then the designated database pro-
vider may provide an electronic database to a
home service provider.
(2) FORMAT.—(A) Such electronic database,
whether provided by the State or the des-
ignated database provider, shall be provided in
a format approved by the American National
Standards Institute’s Accredited Standards
Committee X12, that, allowing for de minimis
deviations, designates for each street address
in the State, including to the extent prac-
ticable, any multiple postal street addresses
applicable to one street location, the appro-
priate taxing jurisdictions, and the appro-
priate code for each taxing jurisdiction, for
each level of taxing jurisdiction, identified by
one nationwide standard numeric code.
(B) Such electronic database shall also pro-
vide the appropriate code for each street ad-
dress with respect to political subdivisions
which are not taxing jurisdictions when rea-
sonably needed to determine the proper taxing
jurisdiction.
(C) The nationwide standard numeric codes
shall contain the same number of numeric dig-
its with each digit or combination of digits re-
ferring to the same level of taxing jurisdiction
throughout the United States using a format
similar to FIPS 55–3 or other appropriate
standard approved by the Federation of Tax
Administrators and the Multistate Tax Com-
mission, or their successors. Each address
shall be provided in standard postal format.
(b) NOTICE; UPDATES.—A State or designated
database provider that provides or maintains an
electronic database described in subsection (a)
shall provide notice of the availability of the
then current electronic database, and any subse-
quent revisions thereof, by publication in the
manner normally employed for the publication
of informational tax, charge, or fee notices to
taxpayers in such State.
(c) USER HELD HARMLESS.—A home service
provider using the data contained in an elec-
tronic database described in subsection (a) shall
be held harmless from any tax, charge, or fee li-
ability that otherwise would be due solely as a
result of any error or omission in such database
provided by a State or designated database pro-
vider. The home service provider shall reflect
changes made to such database during a cal-
endar quarter not later than 30 days after the
end of such calendar quarter for each State that
issues notice of the availability of an electronic
database reflecting such changes under sub-
section (b).
(Added Pub. L. 106–252, § 2(a), July 28, 2000, 114
Stat. 627.)
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT
Section effective July 28, 2000, and applicable only to
customer bills issued after the first day of the first
month beginning more than 2 years after July 28, 2000,
see section 3 of Pub. L. 106–252, set out as a note under
section 116 of this title.
§ 120. Procedure if no electronic database pro-
vided
(a) SAFE HARBOR.—If neither a State nor des-
ignated database provider provides an electronic
database under section 119, a home service pro-
vider shall be held harmless from any tax,
charge, or fee liability in such State that other-
wise would be due solely as a result of an assign-
ment of a street address to an incorrect taxing
jurisdiction if, subject to section 121, the home
service provider employs an enhanced zip code
to assign each street address to a specific taxing
jurisdiction for each level of taxing jurisdiction
and exercises due diligence at each level of tax-
ing jurisdiction to ensure that each such street
address is assigned to the correct taxing juris-
diction. If an enhanced zip code overlaps bound-
aries of taxing jurisdictions of the same level,
the home service provider must designate one
Page 18
TITLE 4—FLAG AND SEAL, SEAT OF GOVERNMENT, AND THE STATES
§ 121
1 So in original. No subsec. (b) was enacted.
specific jurisdiction within such enhanced zip
code for use in taxing the activity for such en-
hanced zip code for each level of taxing jurisdic-
tion. Any enhanced zip code assignment changed
in accordance with section 121 is deemed to be in
compliance with this section. For purposes of
this section, there is a rebuttable presumption
that a home service provider has exercised due
diligence if such home service provider dem-
onstrates that it has—
(1) expended reasonable resources to imple-
ment and maintain an appropriately detailed
electronic database of street address assign-
ments to taxing jurisdictions;
(2) implemented and maintained reasonable
internal
controls
to
promptly
correct
misassignments of street addresses to taxing
jurisdictions; and
(3) used all reasonably obtainable and usable
data pertaining to municipal annexations,
incorporations, reorganizations and any other
changes in jurisdictional boundaries that ma-
terially affect the accuracy of such database.
(b) TERMINATION OF SAFE HARBOR.—Subsection
(a) applies to a home service provider that is in
compliance with the requirements of subsection
(a), with respect to a State for which an elec-
tronic database is not provided under section 119
until the later of—
(1) 18 months after the nationwide standard
numeric code described in section 119(a) has
been approved by the Federation of Tax Ad-
ministrators and the Multistate Tax Commis-
sion; or
(2) 6 months after such State or a designated
database provider in such State provides such
database as prescribed in section 119(a).
(Added Pub. L. 106–252, § 2(a), July 28, 2000, 114
Stat. 628.)
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT
Section effective July 28, 2000, and applicable only to
customer bills issued after the first day of the first
month beginning more than 2 years after July 28, 2000,
see section 3 of Pub. L. 106–252, set out as a note under
section 116 of this title.
§ 121. Correction of erroneous data for place of
primary use
(a) 1 IN GENERAL.—A taxing jurisdiction, or a
State on behalf of any taxing jurisdiction or
taxing jurisdictions within such State, may—
(1) determine that the address used for pur-
poses of determining the taxing jurisdictions
to which taxes, charges, or fees for mobile
telecommunications
services
are
remitted
does not meet the definition of place of pri-
mary use in section 124(8) and give binding no-
tice to the home service provider to change
the place of primary use on a prospective basis
from the date of notice of determination if—
(A) if the taxing jurisdiction making such
determination is not a State, such taxing ju-
risdiction obtains the consent of all affected
taxing jurisdictions within the State before
giving such notice of determination; and
(B) before the taxing jurisdiction gives
such notice of determination, the customer
is given an opportunity to demonstrate in
accordance with applicable State or local
tax, charge, or fee administrative procedures
that the address is the customer’s place of
primary use;
(2) determine that the assignment of a tax-
ing jurisdiction by a home service provider
under section 120 does not reflect the correct
taxing jurisdiction and give binding notice to
the home service provider to change the as-
signment on a prospective basis from the date
of notice of determination if—
(A) if the taxing jurisdiction making such
determination is not a State, such taxing ju-
risdiction obtains the consent of all affected
taxing jurisdictions within the State before
giving such notice of determination; and
(B) the home service provider is given an
opportunity to demonstrate in accordance
with applicable State or local tax, charge, or
fee administrative procedures that the as-
signment reflects the correct taxing juris-
diction.
(Added Pub. L. 106–252, § 2(a), July 28, 2000, 114
Stat. 629.)
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT
Section effective July 28, 2000, and applicable only to
customer bills issued after the first day of the first
month beginning more than 2 years after July 28, 2000,
see section 3 of Pub. L. 106–252, set out as a note under
section 116 of this title.
§ 122. Determination of place of primary use
(a) PLACE OF PRIMARY USE.—A home service
provider shall be responsible for obtaining and
maintaining the customer’s place of primary use
(as defined in section 124). Subject to section 121,
and if the home service provider’s reliance on in-
formation provided by its customer is in good
faith, a taxing jurisdiction shall—
(1) allow a home service provider to rely on
the applicable residential or business street
address supplied by the home service pro-
vider’s customer; and
(2) not hold a home service provider liable
for any additional taxes, charges, or fees based
on a different determination of the place of
primary use for taxes, charges, or fees that are
customarily passed on to the customer as a
separate itemized charge.
(b) ADDRESS UNDER EXISTING AGREEMENTS.—
Except as provided in section 121, a taxing juris-
diction shall allow a home service provider to
treat the address used by the home service pro-
vider for tax purposes for any customer under a
service contract or agreement in effect 2 years
after the date of the enactment of the Mobile
Telecommunications Sourcing Act as that cus-
tomer’s place of primary use for the remaining
term of such service contract or agreement, ex-
cluding any extension or renewal of such service
contract or agreement, for purposes of deter-
mining the taxing jurisdictions to which taxes,
charges, or fees on charges for mobile tele-
communications services are remitted.
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Safe Harbor.—** If neither a State nor designated database provider provides an electronic database under section 119, a home service provider shall be held harmless from any tax, charge, or fee liability in such State that otherwise would be due solely as a result of an assignment of a street address to an incorrect taxing jurisdiction if, subject to section 121, the home service provider employs an enhanced zip code to assign each street address to a specific taxing jurisdiction for each level of taxing jurisdiction and exercises due diligence at each level of taxing jurisdiction to ensure that each such street address is assigned to the correct taxing jurisdiction. If an enhanced zip code overlaps boundaries of taxing jurisdictions of the same level, the home service provider must designate one specific jurisdiction within such enhanced zip code for use in taxing the activity for such enhanced zip code for each level of taxing jurisdiction. Any enhanced zip code assignment changed in accordance with section 121 is deemed to be in compliance with this section. For purposes of this section, there is a rebuttable presumption that a home service provider has exercised due diligence if such home service provider demonstrates that it has—
(1) expended reasonable resources to implement and maintain an appropriately detailed electronic database of street address assignments to taxing jurisdictions;
(2) implemented and maintained reasonable internal controls to promptly correct misassignments of street addresses to taxing jurisdictions; and
(3) used all reasonably obtainable and usable data pertaining to municipal annexations, incorporations, reorganizations and any other changes in jurisdictional boundaries that materially affect the accuracy of such database.
**(b
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 4 U.S.C. § 120
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.