Arkansas Legal Resource Navigator

4 U.S.C. § 120 — Procedure if no electronic database provided

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

4 U.S.C. § 120 — Procedure if no electronic database provided

**(a) Safe Harbor.—** If neither a State nor designated database provider provides an electronic database under section 119, a home service provider shall be held harmless from any tax, charge, or fee liability in such State that otherwise would be due solely as a result of an assignment of a street address to an incorrect taxing jurisdiction if, subject to section 121, the home service provider employs an enhanced zip code to assign each street address to a specific taxing jurisdiction for each level of taxing jurisdiction and exercises due diligence at each level of taxing jurisdiction to ensure that each such street address is assigned to the correct taxing jurisdiction. If an enhanced zip code overlaps boundaries of taxing jurisdictions of the same level, the home service provider must designate one specific jurisdiction within such enhanced zip code for use in taxing the activity for such enhanced zip code for each level of taxing jurisdiction. Any enhanced zip code assignment changed in accordance with section 121 is deemed to be in compliance with this section. For purposes of this section, there is a rebuttable presumption that a home service provider has exercised due diligence if such home service provider demonstrates that it has— (1) expended reasonable resources to implement and maintain an appropriately detailed electronic database of street address assignments to taxing jurisdictions; (2) implemented and maintained reasonable internal controls to promptly correct misassignments of street addresses to taxing jurisdictions; and (3) used all reasonably obtainable and usable data pertaining to municipal annexations, incorporations, reorganizations and any other changes in jurisdictional boundaries that materially affect the accuracy of such database. **(b

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 4 U.S.C. § 120

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.

Original supplied file — preserved unchanged

Download original Markdown file

File SHA-256: 0a25283d0038e76dc5159d68748480db524365808e5f14142b654e71250b4546. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.

Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.

Open the recorded source website ↗

Record provenance

Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:record_usc_a742ec029859320e4918140a
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code/title-4/section-120-procedure-if-no-electronic-database-provided--406493f3b7.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 0d80b80619cacbf5eff76db2d6f8e245a3ef7012426e26c02db3628ff38145a7

Source location: Title 4, Chapter 4, § 120; chapter-004-the-states.md

Stored source content

**(a) Safe Harbor.—** If neither a State nor designated database provider provides an electronic database under section 119, a home service provider shall be held harmless from any tax, charge, or fee liability in such State that otherwise would be due solely as a result of an assignment of a street address to an incorrect taxing jurisdiction if, subject to section 121, the home service provider employs an enhanced zip code to assign each street address to a specific taxing jurisdiction for each level of taxing jurisdiction and exercises due diligence at each level of taxing jurisdiction to ensure that each such street address is assigned to the correct taxing jurisdiction. If an enhanced zip code overlaps boundaries of taxing jurisdictions of the same level, the home service provider must designate one specific jurisdiction within such enhanced zip code for use in taxing the activity for such enhanced zip code for each level of taxing jurisdiction. Any enhanced zip code assignment changed in accordance with section 121 is deemed to be in compliance with this section. For purposes of this section, there is a rebuttable presumption that a home service provider has exercised due diligence if such home service provider demonstrates that it has— (1) expended reasonable resources to implement and maintain an appropriately detailed electronic database of street address assignments to taxing jurisdictions; (2) implemented and maintained reasonable internal controls to promptly correct misassignments of street addresses to taxing jurisdictions; and (3) used all reasonably obtainable and usable data pertaining to municipal annexations, incorporations, reorganizations and any other changes in jurisdictional boundaries that materially affect the accuracy of such database. **(b) Termination of Safe Harbor.—** Subsection (a) applies to a home service provider that is in compliance with the requirements of subsection (a), with respect to a State for which an electronic database is not provided under section 119 until the later of— (1) 18 months after the nationwide standard numeric code described in section 119(a) has been approved by the Federation of Tax Administrators and the Multistate Tax Commission; or (2) 6 months after such State or a designated database provider in such State provides such database as prescribed in section 119(a).

Cross-references

Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

4 U.S.C. § 116 — Rules for determining State and local government treatment of charges related to mobile telecommunications services

**(a) Application of This Section Through Section 126.—** This section through 11 So in original. Probably should be followed by “section”. 126 of this title apply to any tax, charge, or fee levied by a taxing jurisdiction as a fixed charge for each customer or measured by gross amounts charged to customers for mobile telecommunications services, regardless of whether such tax, charge, or fee is imposed on the vendor or customer of the service and regardless of the terminology used to describe the tax, charge, or fee. **(b) General Exceptions.—** This section through 1 126 of this title do not apply to— (1) any tax, charge, or fee levied upon or measured by the net income, capital stock, net worth, or property value of the provider of mobile telecommunications service; (2) any tax, charge, or fee that is applied to an equitably apportioned amount that is not determined on a transactional basis; (3) any tax, charge, or fee that represents compensation for a mobile telecommunications service provider’s use of public rights of way or other public property, provided that such tax, charge, or fee is not levied by the taxing jurisdiction as a fixed charge for each customer or measured by gross amounts charged to customers for mobile telecommunication services; (4) any generally applicable business and occupation tax that is imposed by a State, is applied to gross receipts or gross proceeds, is the legal liability of the home service provider, and that statutorily allows the home service provider to elect to use the sourcing method required in this section through 1 126 of this title; (5) any fee related to obligations under section 254 of the Communications Act of 1934; or (6) any tax, charge, or fee imposed by the Federal Communications Commission. **(c) Specific Exc

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 4 U.S.C. § 116

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

4 U.S.C. § 120 — Procedure if no electronic database pro-

Page 17 TITLE 4—FLAG AND SEAL, SEAT OF GOVERNMENT, AND THE STATES § 120 (b) JURISDICTION.—All charges for mobile tele- communications services that are deemed to be provided by the customer’s home service pro- vider under sections 116 through 126 of this title are authorized to be subjected to tax, charge, or fee by the taxing jurisdictions whose territorial limits encompass the customer’s place of pri- mary use, regardless of where the mobile tele- communication services originate, terminate, or pass through, and no other taxing jurisdiction may impose taxes, charges, or fees on charges for such mobile telecommunications services. (Added Pub. L. 106–252, § 2(a), July 28, 2000, 114 Stat. 627.) Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT Section effective July 28, 2000, and applicable only to customer bills issued after the first day of the first month beginning more than 2 years after July 28, 2000, see section 3 of Pub. L. 106–252, set out as a note under section 116 of this title. § 118. Limitations Sections 116 through 126 of this title do not— (1) provide authority to a taxing jurisdiction to impose a tax, charge, or fee that the laws of such jurisdiction do not authorize such juris- diction to impose; or (2) modify, impair, supersede, or authorize the modification, impairment, or supersession of the law of any taxing jurisdiction per- taining to taxation except as expressly pro- vided in sections 116 through 126 of this title. (Added Pub. L. 106–252, § 2(a), July 28, 2000, 114 Stat. 627.) Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT Section effective July 28, 2000, and applicable only to customer bills issued after the first day of the first month beginning more t

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 4 U.S.C. § 120

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.