Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
6 U.S.C. § 240 — Border Enforcement Security Task Force
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 129
TITLE 6—DOMESTIC SECURITY
§ 240
1 So in original. Probably should be followed by a semicolon.
for Domestic Preparedness shall be within the Direc-
torate of Border and Transportation Security.’’
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 114–125, § 802(g)(1)(B)(iv)(II)(bb),
struck out at end ‘‘The Director of the Office for Do-
mestic Preparedness shall report directly to the Under
Secretary for Border and Transportation Security.’’
Subsec. (c)(7). Pub. L. 114–125, § 802(g)(1)(B)(iv)(II)(cc),
substituted ‘‘functions of the Department’’ for ‘‘func-
tions of the Directorate’’.
2012—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 112–166 struck out ‘‘, by and
with the advice and consent of the Senate’’ before pe-
riod at end of first sentence.
2004—Subsec. (c)(9). Pub. L. 108–458 added par. (9).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2012 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 112–166 effective 60 days after
Aug. 10, 2012, and applicable to appointments made on
and after that effective date, including any nomination
pending in the Senate on that date, see section 6(a) of
Pub. L. 112–166, set out as a note under section 113 of
this title.
§ 239. Office of Cargo Security Policy
(a) Establishment
There is established within the Department an
Office of Cargo Security Policy (referred to in
this section as the ‘‘Office’’).
(b) Purpose
The Office shall—
(1) coordinate all Department policies relat-
ing to cargo security; and
(2) consult with stakeholders and coordinate
with other Federal agencies in the establish-
ment of standards and regulations and to pro-
mote best practices.
(c) Director
(1) Appointment
The Office shall be headed by a Director,
who shall—
(A) be appointed by the Secretary; and
(B) report to the Assistant Secretary for
Policy.
(2) Responsibilities
The Dir
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 6 U.S.C. § 240
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: 9a146695693ab6776976a0cacd2de353d04eec507aa7c0e038b35e39884f7a9c. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-0a51b6d6a7981b47676efd32
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-6/section-240-border-enforcement-security-task-force--433083307f.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 1a4ebaa0574e1f2dfc8e8a75a162ae826429fffcd24aaa0e21b5caf761f53ef1
Source location: USCODE-2024-title6-chap1-subchapIV-partC-sec240.pdf
Stored source content
Page 129
TITLE 6—DOMESTIC SECURITY
§ 240
1 So in original. Probably should be followed by a semicolon.
for Domestic Preparedness shall be within the Direc-
torate of Border and Transportation Security.’’
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 114–125, § 802(g)(1)(B)(iv)(II)(bb),
struck out at end ‘‘The Director of the Office for Do-
mestic Preparedness shall report directly to the Under
Secretary for Border and Transportation Security.’’
Subsec. (c)(7). Pub. L. 114–125, § 802(g)(1)(B)(iv)(II)(cc),
substituted ‘‘functions of the Department’’ for ‘‘func-
tions of the Directorate’’.
2012—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 112–166 struck out ‘‘, by and
with the advice and consent of the Senate’’ before pe-
riod at end of first sentence.
2004—Subsec. (c)(9). Pub. L. 108–458 added par. (9).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2012 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 112–166 effective 60 days after
Aug. 10, 2012, and applicable to appointments made on
and after that effective date, including any nomination
pending in the Senate on that date, see section 6(a) of
Pub. L. 112–166, set out as a note under section 113 of
this title.
§ 239. Office of Cargo Security Policy
(a) Establishment
There is established within the Department an
Office of Cargo Security Policy (referred to in
this section as the ‘‘Office’’).
(b) Purpose
The Office shall—
(1) coordinate all Department policies relat-
ing to cargo security; and
(2) consult with stakeholders and coordinate
with other Federal agencies in the establish-
ment of standards and regulations and to pro-
mote best practices.
(c) Director
(1) Appointment
The Office shall be headed by a Director,
who shall—
(A) be appointed by the Secretary; and
(B) report to the Assistant Secretary for
Policy.
(2) Responsibilities
The Director shall—
(A) advise the Assistant Secretary for Pol-
icy in the development of Department-wide
policies regarding cargo security;
(B) coordinate all policies relating to
cargo security among the agencies and of-
fices within the Department relating to
cargo security; and
(C) coordinate the cargo security policies
of the Department with the policies of other
executive agencies.
(Pub. L. 107–296, title IV, § 431, as added Pub. L.
109–347, title III, § 301(a), Oct. 13, 2006, 120 Stat.
1920.)
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
RULE OF CONSTRUCTION
Pub. L. 109–347, title III, § 301(c), Oct. 13, 2006, 120 Stat.
1920, provided that: ‘‘Nothing in this section [enacting
this section and section 1001 of this title] shall be con-
strued to affect—
‘‘(1) the authorities, functions, or capabilities of the
Coast Guard to perform its missions; or
‘‘(2) the requirement under section 888 of the Home-
land Security Act (6 U.S.C. 468) that those authori-
ties, functions, and capabilities be maintained in-
tact.’’
§ 240. Border Enforcement Security Task Force
(a) Establishment
There is established within the Department a
program to be known as the Border Enforcement
Security Task Force (referred to in this section
as ‘‘BEST’’).
(b) Purpose
The purpose of BEST is to establish units to
enhance border security by addressing and re-
ducing border security threats and violence by—
(1) facilitating collaboration among Federal,
State, local, tribal, and foreign law enforce-
ment agencies to execute coordinated activi-
ties in furtherance of border security, and
homeland security; and
(2) enhancing information-sharing, including
the dissemination of homeland security infor-
mation among such agencies.
(c) Composition and establishment of units
(1) Composition
BEST units may be comprised of personnel
from—
(A) U.S. Immigration and Customs En-
forcement;
(B) U.S. Customs and Border Protection;
(C) the United States Coast Guard;
(D) other Department personnel, as appro-
priate 1
(E) other Federal agencies, as appropriate;
(F) appropriate State law enforcement
agencies;
(G) foreign law enforcement agencies, as
appropriate;
(H) local law enforcement agencies from
affected border cities and communities; and
(I) appropriate tribal law enforcement
agencies.
(2) Establishment of units
The Secretary is authorized to establish
BEST units in jurisdictions in which such
units can contribute to BEST missions, as ap-
propriate. Before establishing a BEST unit,
the Secretary shall consider—
(A) whether the area in which the BEST
unit would be established is significantly
impacted by cross-border threats;
(B) the availability of Federal, State,
local, tribal, and foreign law enforcement re-
sources to participate in the BEST unit;
(C) the extent to which border security
threats are having a significant harmful im-
pact in the jurisdiction in which the BEST
unit is to be established, and other jurisdic-
tions in the country; and
(D) whether or not an Integrated Border
Enforcement Team already exists in the
area in which the BEST unit would be estab-
lished.
(3) Duplication of efforts
In determining whether to establish a new
BEST unit or to expand an existing BEST unit
in a given jurisdiction, the Secretary shall en-
Page 130
TITLE 6—DOMESTIC SECURITY
§ 241
sure that the BEST unit under consideration
does not duplicate the efforts of other existing
interagency task forces or centers within that
jurisdiction.
(d) Operation
After determining the jurisdictions in which
to establish BEST units under subsection (c)(2),
and in order to provide Federal assistance to
such jurisdictions, the Secretary may—
(1) direct the assignment of Federal per-
sonnel to BEST, subject to the approval of the
head of the department or agency that em-
ploys such personnel; and
(2) take other actions to assist Federal,
State, local, and tribal entities to participate
in BEST, including providing financial assist-
ance, as appropriate, for operational, adminis-
trative, salary reimbursement, and techno-
logical costs associated with the participation
of Federal, State, local, and tribal law enforce-
ment agencies in BEST.
(e) Report
Not later than 180 days after the date on which
BEST is established under this section, and an-
nually thereafter for the following 5 years, the
Secretary shall submit a report to Congress that
describes the effectiveness of BEST in enhancing
border security and reducing the drug traf-
ficking, arms smuggling, illegal alien traf-
ficking and smuggling, violence, and kidnapping
along and across the international borders of
the United States, as measured by crime statis-
tics, including violent deaths, incidents of vio-
lence, and drug-related arrests.
(Pub. L. 107–296, title IV, § 432, as added Pub. L.
112–205, § 3(a), Dec. 7, 2012, 126 Stat. 1488; amend-
ed Pub. L. 117–159, div. A, title II, § 12004(j), June
25, 2022, 136 Stat. 1332.)
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
2022—Subsec. (d)(2). Pub. L. 117–159 inserted ‘‘salary
reimbursement,’’ after ‘‘administrative,’’.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
RULE OF CONSTRUCTION
Nothing in amendment made by Pub. L. 117–159 to be
construed to allow the establishment of a Federal sys-
tem of registration of firearms, firearms owners, or
firearms transactions or dispositions, see section
12004(k) of Pub. L. 117–159, set out as a note under sec-
tion 922 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure.
FINDINGS AND DECLARATION OF PURPOSES
Pub. L. 112–205, § 2, Dec. 7, 2012, 126 Stat. 1487, provided
that: ‘‘Congress finds the following:
‘‘(1) The Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS)
overriding mission is to lead a unified national effort
to protect the United States. United States Immigra-
tion and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is the largest in-
vestigative agency within DHS and is charged with
enforcing a wide array of laws, including laws related
to securing the border and combating criminal smug-
gling.
‘‘(2) Mexico’s northern border with the United
States has experienced a dramatic surge in border
crime and violence in recent years due to intense
competition between Mexican drug cartels and crimi-
nal smuggling organizations that employ predatory
tactics to realize their profits.
‘‘(3) Law enforcement agencies at the United States
northern
border
also
face
challenges
from
transnational smuggling organizations.
‘‘(4) In response, DHS has partnered with Federal,
State, local, tribal, and foreign law enforcement
counterparts to create the Border Enforcement Secu-
rity Task Force (BEST) initiative as a comprehensive
approach to addressing border security threats. These
multi-agency teams are designed to increase informa-
tion-sharing and collaboration among the partici-
pating law enforcement agencies.
‘‘(5) BEST teams incorporate personnel from ICE,
United States Customs and Border Protection (CBP),
the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), the Bu-
reau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
(ATFE), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI),
the United States Coast Guard (USCG), and the U.S.
Attorney’s Office (USAO), along with other key Fed-
eral, State and local law enforcement agencies.
‘‘(6) Foreign law enforcement agencies partici-
pating in BEST include Mexico’s Secretaria de
Seguridad Publica (SSP), the Canada Border Services
Agency (CBSA), the Ontario Provincial Police (OPP),
and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP).’’
§ 241. Prevention of international child abduc-
tion
(a) Program established
The Secretary, through the Commissioner of
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (referred to
in this section as ‘‘CBP’’), in coordination with
the Secretary of State, the Attorney General,
and the Director of the Federal Bureau of Inves-
tigation, shall establish a program that—
(1) seeks to prevent a child (as defined in
section 1204(b)(1) of title 18) from departing
from the territory of the United States if a
parent or legal guardian of such child presents
a court order from a court of competent juris-
diction prohibiting the removal of such child
from the United States to a CBP Officer in suf-
ficient time to prevent such departure for the
duration of such court order; and
(2) leverages other existing authorities and
processes to address the wrongful removal and
return of a child.
(b) Interagency coordination
(1) In general
The Secretary of State shall convene and
chair an interagency working group to prevent
international parental child abduction. The
group shall be composed of presidentially ap-
pointed, Senate confirmed officials from—
(A) the Department of State;
(B) the Department of Homeland Security,
including U.S. Customs and Border Protec-
tion and U.S. Immigration and Customs En-
forcement; and
(C) the Department of Justice, including
the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
(2) Department of Defense
The Secretary of Defense shall designate an
official within the Department of Defense—
(A) to coordinate with the Department of
State
on
international
child
abduction
issues; and
(B) to oversee activities designed to pre-
vent or resolve international child abduction
cases relating to active duty military serv-
ice members.
(Pub. L. 107–296, title IV, § 433, as added Pub. L.
113–150, title III, § 301(a), Aug. 8, 2014, 128 Stat.
1822.)
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Consultation with Federal Aviation Administration** The Secretary and other officials in the Department shall consult with the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration before taking any action that might affect aviation safety, air carrier operations, aircraft airworthiness, or the use of airspace. The Secretary shall establish a liaison office within the Department for the purpose of consulting with the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration.
**(b) Report to Congress** Not later than 60 days after November 25, 2002, the Secretary of Transportation shall transmit to Congress a report containing a plan for complying with the requirements of [section 44901(d) of title 49](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title49-section44901/d&num=0&edition=prelim).
**(c) Limitations on statutory construction**
(1) **Grant of authority** — Nothing in this chapter may be construed to vest in the Secretary or any other official in the Department any authority over transportation security that is not vested in the Under Secretary of Transportation for Security, or in the Secretary of Transportation under chapter 449 of title 49 on the day before November 25, 2002.
(2) **Obligation of AIP funds** — Nothing in this chapter may be construed to authorize the Secretary or any other official in the Department to obligate amounts made available under [section 48103 of title 49](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title49-section48103&num=0&edition=prelim).
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 6 U.S.C. § 240
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
In fiscal year 2004 and thereafter, the Center is authorized to accept detailees from other Federal agencies, on a non-reimbursable basis, to staff the accreditation function.
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 6 U.S.C. § 468
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 6 U.S.C. § 468. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 240
TITLE 6—DOMESTIC SECURITY
§ 466
rity Task Force composed of representatives
from military and civilian agencies of the
United States Government for the purposes of
anticipating terrorist threats against the United
States and taking appropriate actions to pre-
vent harm to the United States.
(b) Structure
It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary
should model the Joint Interagency Homeland
Security Task Force on the approach taken by
the Joint Interagency Task Forces for drug
interdiction at Key West, Florida and Alameda,
California, to the maximum extent feasible and
appropriate.
(Pub. L. 107–296, title VIII, § 885, Nov. 25, 2002, 116
Stat. 2247.)
§ 466. Sense of Congress reaffirming the contin-
ued importance and applicability of the
Posse Comitatus Act
(a) Findings
Congress finds the following:
(1) Section 1385 of title 18 (commonly known
as the ‘‘Posse Comitatus Act’’) prohibits the
use of the Armed Forces as a posse comitatus
to execute the laws except in cases and under
circumstances expressly authorized by the
Constitution or Act of Congress.
(2) Enacted in 1878, the Posse Comitatus Act
was expressly intended to prevent United
States Marshals, on their own initiative, from
calling on the Army for assistance in enforc-
ing Federal law.
(3) The Posse Comitatus Act has served the
Nation well in limiting the use of the Armed
Forces to enforce the law.
(4) Nevertheless, by its express terms, the
Posse Comitatus Act is not a complete barrier
to the use of the Armed Forces for a range of
domestic purposes, including law enforcement
functions, when the use of the Armed Forces is
authorized by Act of Congress or the President
determines that the use of the Armed Forces
is required to fulfill the President’s obliga-
tions
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 6 U.S.C. § 468
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 6 U.S.C. § 468. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.