Arkansas Legal Resource Navigator

7 U.S.C. § 7256 — Northeast Interstate Dairy Compact

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

7 U.S.C. § 7256 — Northeast Interstate Dairy Compact

Page 1985 TITLE 7—AGRICULTURE § 7256 1 See Codification note below. 1 So in original. Probably should be preceded by ‘‘of’’. Federal Register on September 1, 1999 (64 Fed. Reg. 47897–48021). ‘‘(c) TIME PERIOD FOR RULEMAKING.—On December 1, 2000, the Secretary of Agriculture shall publish in the Federal Register a final decision on the Class III and Class IV milk pricing formulas. The resulting formulas shall take effect, and be implemented by the Secretary, on January 1, 2001. ‘‘(d) EFFECT OF COURT ORDER.—The actions author- ized by subsections (b) and (c) are intended to ensure the timely publication and implementation of new pric- ing formulas for Class III and Class IV milk. In the event that the Secretary of Agriculture is enjoined or otherwise restrained by a court order from imple- menting a final decision within the time period speci- fied in subsection (c), the length of time for which that injunction or other restraining order is effective shall be added to the time limitations specified in subsection (c) thereby extending those time limitations by a pe- riod of time equal to the period of time for which the injunction or other restraining order is effective. ‘‘(e) FAILURE TO TIMELY COMPLETE RULEMAKING.—If the Secretary of Agriculture fails to implement new Class III and Class IV milk pricing formulas within the time period required under subsection (c) (plus any ad- ditional period provided under subsection (d)), the Sec- retary may not assess or collect assessments from milk producers or handlers under section 8c of the Agricul- tural Adjustment Act (7 U.S.C. 608c), reenacted with amendments by the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, for marketing order administration and services provided under such section after the end of

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 7 U.S.C. § 7256

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.

Original supplied file — preserved unchanged

Download original Markdown file

File SHA-256: 979a32393814f098afc97e7f18cd625e43fcf8f571b4d616cafa81b0792e31d6. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.

Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.

Open the recorded source website ↗

Record provenance

Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-02a7971b9d25d9129358760d
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-7/section-7256-northeast-interstate-dairy-compact--cacff43e44.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: aa9c435236bd6653d65c95c39402561d2eea811b572f2e6801e610e326041c10

Source location: USCODE-2024-title7-chap100-subchapIV-partA-sec7256.pdf

Stored source content

Page 1985 TITLE 7—AGRICULTURE § 7256 1 See Codification note below. 1 So in original. Probably should be preceded by ‘‘of’’. Federal Register on September 1, 1999 (64 Fed. Reg. 47897–48021). ‘‘(c) TIME PERIOD FOR RULEMAKING.—On December 1, 2000, the Secretary of Agriculture shall publish in the Federal Register a final decision on the Class III and Class IV milk pricing formulas. The resulting formulas shall take effect, and be implemented by the Secretary, on January 1, 2001. ‘‘(d) EFFECT OF COURT ORDER.—The actions author- ized by subsections (b) and (c) are intended to ensure the timely publication and implementation of new pric- ing formulas for Class III and Class IV milk. In the event that the Secretary of Agriculture is enjoined or otherwise restrained by a court order from imple- menting a final decision within the time period speci- fied in subsection (c), the length of time for which that injunction or other restraining order is effective shall be added to the time limitations specified in subsection (c) thereby extending those time limitations by a pe- riod of time equal to the period of time for which the injunction or other restraining order is effective. ‘‘(e) FAILURE TO TIMELY COMPLETE RULEMAKING.—If the Secretary of Agriculture fails to implement new Class III and Class IV milk pricing formulas within the time period required under subsection (c) (plus any ad- ditional period provided under subsection (d)), the Sec- retary may not assess or collect assessments from milk producers or handlers under section 8c of the Agricul- tural Adjustment Act (7 U.S.C. 608c), reenacted with amendments by the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, for marketing order administration and services provided under such section after the end of that period until the pricing formulas are imple- mented. The Secretary may not reduce the level of services provided under that section on account of the prohibition against assessments, but shall rather cover the cost of marketing order administration and serv- ices through funds available for the Agricultural Mar- keting Service of the Department. ‘‘(f) IMPLEMENTATION OF REQUIREMENT.—The imple- mentation of the final decision on new Class III and Class IV milk pricing formulas shall not be subject to congressional review under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code.’’ § 7254. Effect on fluid milk standards in State of California Nothing in this Act or any other provision of law shall be construed to preempt, prohibit, or otherwise limit the authority of the State of California, directly or indirectly, to establish or continue to effect any law, regulation, or re- quirement regarding— (1) the percentage of milk solids or solids not fat in fluid milk products sold at retail or marketed in the State of California; or (2) the labeling of such fluid milk products with regard to milk solids or solids not fat. (Pub. L. 104–127, title I, § 144, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 917.) § 7255. Milk manufacturing marketing adjust- ment (a) Maximum allowances established No State shall provide for a manufacturing al- lowance for the processing of milk in excess of— (1) $1.65 per hundredweight of milk for milk manufactured into butter and nonfat dry milk; and (2) $1.80 per hundredweight of milk for milk manufactured into cheese. (b) ‘‘Manufacturing allowance’’ defined In this section, the term ‘‘manufacturing al- lowance’’ means— (1) the amount by which the product price value of butter and nonfat dry milk manufac- tured from a hundred pounds of milk con- taining 3.5 pounds of butterfat and 8.7 pounds of milk solids not fat resulting from a State’s yield and product price formulas exceeds the class price for the milk used to produce those products; or (2) the amount by which the product price value of cheese manufactured from a hundred pounds of milk containing 3.5 pounds of but- terfat and 8.7 pounds of milk solids not fat re- sulting from a State’s yield and product price formulas exceeds the class price for the milk used to produce cheese. (c) Effect of violation If the Secretary determines following a hear- ing that a State has in effect a manufacturing allowance that exceeds the manufacturing al- lowance authorized in subsection (a), the Sec- retary shall suspend purchases of cheddar cheese, butter, and nonfat dry milk produced in that State until such time as the State complies with such subsection. (d) Effective date; implementation This section (other than subsection (e) 1) shall be effective during the period beginning on the first day of the first month beginning after April 4, 1996, and ending on December 31, 1999. During that period, the Secretary may exercise the au- thority provided to the Secretary under this sec- tion without regard to the issuance of regula- tions intended to carry out this section. (Pub. L. 104–127, title I, § 145, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 917.) Editorial Notes CODIFICATION Section is comprised of section 145 of Pub. L. 104–127. Subsec. (e) of section 145 of Pub. L. 104–127 repealed sec- tion 1446e–1 of this title and enacted provisions set out as a note under section 1446e–1 of this title. § 7256. Northeast Interstate Dairy Compact Congress hereby consents to the Northeast Interstate Dairy Compact entered into among the States of Connecticut, Maine, Massachu- setts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island and Vermont as specified in section 1(b) Senate 1 Joint Resolution 28 of the 104th Congress, as placed on the calendar of the Senate, subject to the following conditions: (1) Finding of compelling public interest Based upon a finding by the Secretary of a compelling public interest in the Compact re- gion, the Secretary may grant the States that have ratified the Northeast Interstate Dairy Compact, as of April 4, 1996, the authority to implement the Northeast Interstate Dairy Compact. (2) Limitation on manufacturing price The Northeast Interstate Dairy Compact Commission shall not regulate Class II, Class III, or Class III–A milk used for manufacturing Page 1986 TITLE 7—AGRICULTURE § 7257 2 See References in Text note below. purposes or any other milk, other than Class I (fluid) milk, as defined by a Federal milk mar- keting order issued under section 608c of this title. (3) Duration Consent for the Northeast Interstate Dairy Compact shall terminate on September 30, 2001. (4) Additional States Delaware, New Jersey, New York, Pennsyl- vania, Maryland, and Virginia are the only ad- ditional States that may join the Northeast Interstate Dairy Compact, individually or oth- erwise, if upon entry the State is contiguous to a participating State and if Congress con- sents to the entry of the State into the Com- pact after April 4, 1996. (5) Compensation of Commodity Credit Cor- poration Before the end of each fiscal year that a Compact price regulation is in effect, the Northeast Interstate Dairy Compact Commis- sion shall compensate the Commodity Credit Corporation for the cost of any purchases of milk and milk products by the Corporation that result from the projected rate of increase in milk production for the fiscal year within the Compact region in excess of the projected national average rate of the increase in milk production, as determined by the Secretary. (6) Milk marketing order Administrator At the request of the Northeast Interstate Dairy Compact Commission, the Adminis- trator of the applicable Federal milk mar- keting order issued under section 608c(5) 2 of this title shall provide technical assistance to the Compact Commission and be compensated for that assistance. (7) Further conditions The Northeast Interstate Dairy Compact Commission shall not prohibit or in any way limit the marketing in the Compact region of any milk or milk product produced in any other production area in the United States. The Compact Commission shall respect and abide by the ongoing procedures between Fed- eral milk marketing orders with respect to the sharing of proceeds from sales within the Com- pact region of bulk milk, packaged milk, or producer milk originating from outside of the Compact region. The Compact Commission shall not use compensatory payments under section 10(6) of the Compact as a barrier to the entry of milk into the Compact region or for any other purpose. Establishment of a Com- pact over-order price, in itself, shall not be considered a compensatory payment or a limi- tation or prohibition on the marketing of milk. (Pub. L. 104–127, title I, § 147, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 919; Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, § 1000(a)(8) [§ 4], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–520.) Editorial Notes REFERENCES IN TEXT Section 608c(5) of this title, referred to in par. (6), was in the original ‘‘section 8(c)5 of the Agricultural Ad- justment Act (7 U.S.C. 608c), reenacted with amend- ments by the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937,’’ which was translated as meaning section 8c(5) of the Agricultural Adjustment Act, to reflect the prob- able intent of Congress. AMENDMENTS 1999—Par. (3). Pub. L. 106–113 substituted ‘‘on Sep- tember 30, 2001.’’ for ‘‘concurrent with the Secretary’s implementation of the dairy pricing and Federal milk marketing order consolidation and reforms under sec- tion 7253 of this title.’’ § 7257. Authority to assist in establishment and maintenance of one or more export trading companies The Secretary of Agriculture shall, consistent with the obligations of the United States as a member of the World Trade Organization, pro- vide such advice and assistance to the United States dairy industry as may be necessary to en- able that industry to establish and maintain one or more export trading companies under the Ex- port Trading Company Act of 1982 (15 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.) for the purpose of facilitating the inter- national market development for and expor- tation of dairy products produced in the United States. (Pub. L. 104–127, title I, § 149, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 921.) Editorial Notes REFERENCES IN TEXT The Export Trading Company Act of 1982, referred to in text, is title I of Pub. L. 97–290, Oct. 8, 1982, 96 Stat. 1233, which is classified generally to subchapter I (§ 4001 et seq.) of chapter 66 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 4001 of Title 15 and Tables. § 7258. Standby authority to indicate entity best suited to provide international market devel- opment and export services (a) Indication of entity best suited to assist inter- national market development for and export of United States dairy products The Secretary of Agriculture shall indicate which entity or entities autonomous of the Gov- ernment of the United States, which seeks such a designation, is best suited to facilitate the international market development for and ex- portation of United States dairy products, if the Secretary determines that— (1) the United States dairy industry has not established an export trading company under the Export Trading Company Act of 1982 (15 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.) for the purpose of facili- tating the international market development for an exportation of dairy products produced in the United States on or before June 30, 1997; or (2) the quantity of exports of United States dairy products during the 12-month period pre- ceding July 1, 1998 does not exceed the quan- tity of exports of United States dairy products

Cross-references

Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

15 U.S.C. § 4001 — Congressional findings and declaration of purpose

**(a)** The Congress finds that— (1) United States exports are responsible for creating and maintaining one out of every nine manufacturing jobs in the United States and for generating one out of every seven dollars of total United States goods produced; (2) the rapidly growing service-related industries are vital to the well-being of the United States economy inasmuch as they create jobs for seven out of every ten Americans, provide 65 per centum of the Nation’s gross national product, and offer the greatest potential for significantly increased industrial trade involving finished products; (3) trade deficits contribute to the decline of the dollar on international currency markets and have an inflationary impact on the United States economy; (4) tens of thousands of small- and medium-sized United States businesses produce exportable goods or services but do not engage in exporting; (5) although the United States is the world’s leading agricultural exporting nation, many farm products are not marketed as widely and effectively abroad as they could be through export trading companies; (6) export trade services in the United States are fragmented into a multitude of separate functions, and companies attempting to offer export trade services lack financial leverage to reach a significant number of potential United States exporters; (7) the United States needs well-developed export trade intermediaries which can achieve economies of scale and acquire expertise enabling them to export goods and services profitably, at low per unit cost to producers; (8) the development of export trading companies in the United States has been hampered by business attitudes and by Government regulations; (9) those activities of State and local governmental authorities which initiate

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 15 U.S.C. § 4001

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 15 U.S.C. § 4001. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

15 U.S.C. § 4001 — Congressional findings and declaration of

Page 2094 TITLE 15—COMMERCE AND TRADE § 3906 (d) State authority to specify acceptable means of demonstrating financial responsibility Subject to the provisions of section 3902(a)(4) of this title relating to discrimination, nothing in this chapter shall be construed to preempt the authority of a State to specify acceptable means of demonstrating financial responsibility where the State has required a demonstration of financial responsibility as a condition for ob- taining a license or permit to undertake speci- fied activities. Such means may include or ex- clude insurance coverage obtained from an ad- mitted insurance company, an excess lines com- pany, a risk retention group, or any other source regardless of whether coverage is ob- tained directly from an insurance company or through a broker, agent, purchasing group, or any other person. (Pub. L. 97–45, § 6, as added Pub. L. 99–563, § 8(c), Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3175.) § 3906. Injunctive orders issued by United States district courts Any district court of the United States may issue an order enjoining a risk retention group from soliciting or selling insurance, or oper- ating, in any State (or in all States) or in any territory or possession of the United States upon a finding of such court that such group is in hazardous financial condition. Such order shall be binding on such group, its officers, agents, and employees, and on any other person acting in active concert with any such officer, agent, or employee, if such other person has ac- tual notice of such order. (Pub. L. 97–45, § 7, as added Pub. L. 99–563, § 9, Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3176.) CHAPTER 66—PROMOTION OF EXPORT TRADE SUBCHAPTER I—EXPORT TRADING COMPANIES AND TRADE ASSOCIATIONS Sec. 4001. Congressional findings an

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 15 U.S.C. § 4001

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 15 U.S.C. § 4001. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

7 U.S.C. § 608c — Orders

(1) **Issuance by Secretary** — The Secretary of Agriculture shall, subject to the provisions of this section, issue, and from time to time amend, orders applicable to processors, associations of producers, and others engaged in the handling of any agricultural commodity or product thereof specified in subsection (2) of this section. Such persons are referred to in this chapter as “handlers”. Such orders shall regulate, in the manner hereinafter in this section provided, only such handling of such agricultural commodity, or product thereof, as is in the current of interstate or foreign commerce, or which directly burdens, obstructs, or affects, interstate or foreign commerce in such commodity or product thereof. In carrying out this section, the Secretary shall complete all informal rulemaking actions necessary to respond to recommendations submitted by administrative committees for such orders as expeditiously as possible, but not more than 45 days (to the extent practicable) after submission of the committee recommendations. The Secretary is authorized to implement a producer allotment program and a handler withholding program under the cranberry marketing order in the same crop year through informal rulemaking based on a recommendation and supporting economic analysis submitted by the Cranberry Marketing Committee. Such recommendation and analysis shall be submitted by the Committee no later than March 1 of each year. The Secretary shall establish time frames for each office and agency within the Department of Agriculture to consider the committee recommendations. (2) **Commodities to which applicable** — Orders issued pursuant to this section shall be applicable only to (A) the following agricultural commodities and the products thereof (except canned or frozen pea

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 7 U.S.C. § 608c

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 7 U.S.C. § 608c. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

7 U.S.C. § 608c — Orders

Page 460 TITLE 7—AGRICULTURE § 608c 1 See References in Text note below. dition to those handlers who have entered into the agreement; and (ii) be paid to the Secretary. (2) Violation of this subsection by a person who has not entered into such an agreement shall result in the assessment by the Secretary of a penalty equal to 140 percent of the support price for quota peanuts multiplied by the quan- tity of peanuts sold or disposed of in violation of subsection (b)(1)(B), as determined under section 1445c–3 1 of this title, for the marketing year for the crop with respect to which such violation occurs. (May 12, 1933, ch. 25, title I, § 8b, formerly § 8(2), 48 Stat. 34; Apr. 7, 1934, ch. 103, § 7, 48 Stat. 528; renumbered and amended Aug. 24, 1935, ch. 641, § 4, 49 Stat. 753; June 3, 1937, ch. 296, § 1, 50 Stat. 246; June 30, 1947, ch. 166, title II, § 206(d), 61 Stat. 208; Pub. L. 101–220, § 4, Dec. 12, 1989, 103 Stat. 1878; Pub. L. 102–237, title I, § 115(1), Dec. 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 1840; Pub. L. 103–66, title I, § 1109(b), Aug. 10, 1993, 107 Stat. 326.) Editorial Notes REFERENCES IN TEXT Section 1445c–3 of this title, referred to in subsec. (b)(2), was repealed by Pub. L. 104–127, title I, § 171(b)(2)(E), Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 938. CODIFICATION The provisions appearing in subsec. (a) of this section except the first sentence, were originally enacted as part of section 8(2) of act May 12, 1933, and formerly ap- peared as section 608(2) of this title. AMENDMENTS 1993—Subsec. (b)(1)(C). Pub. L. 103–66 added subpar. (C). 1991—Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 102–237 made technical amendment to reference to section 1445c–3 of this title involving corresponding provisions of original Act. 1989—Pub. L. 101–220 designated existing provisions as

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 7 U.S.C. § 608c

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 7 U.S.C. § 608c. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

7 U.S.C. § 7256 — Northeast Interstate Dairy Compact

Congress hereby consents to the Northeast Interstate Dairy Compact entered into among the States of Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island and Vermont as specified in section 1(b) Senate 11 So in original. Probably should be preceded by “of”. Joint Resolution 28 of the 104th Congress, as placed on the calendar of the Senate, subject to the following conditions: (1) **Finding of compelling public interest** — Based upon a finding by the Secretary of a compelling public interest in the Compact region, the Secretary may grant the States that have ratified the Northeast Interstate Dairy Compact, as of April 4, 1996, the authority to implement the Northeast Interstate Dairy Compact. (2) **Limitation on manufacturing price** — The Northeast Interstate Dairy Compact Commission shall not regulate Class II, Class III, or Class III–A milk used for manufacturing purposes or any other milk, other than Class I (fluid) milk, as defined by a Federal milk marketing order issued under [section 608c of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title7-section608c&num=0&edition=prelim). (3) **Duration** — Consent for the Northeast Interstate Dairy Compact shall terminate on September 30, 2001. (4) **Additional States** — Delaware, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Maryland, and Virginia are the only additional States that may join the Northeast Interstate Dairy Compact, individually or otherwise, if upon entry the State is contiguous to a participating State and if Congress consents to the entry of the State into the Compact after April 4, 1996. (5) **Compensation of Commodity Credit Corporation** — Before the end of each fiscal year that a Compact price regulation is in effect, the Northeast Interstate Dairy Compact Commission

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 7 U.S.C. § 7256

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.