Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections

2 U.S.C. § 1512 — Definitions

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

2 U.S.C. § 1512 — Definitions

For purposes of this chapter— (1) except as provided in [section 1555 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title2-section1555&num=0&edition=prelim), the terms defined under [section 658 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title2-section658&num=0&edition=prelim) shall have the meanings as so defined; and (2) the term “Director” means the Director of the Congressional Budget Office.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 2 U.S.C. § 1512

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.

Original supplied file — preserved unchanged

Download original Markdown file

File SHA-256: f95948d231b032f12cd3e1d189887eab517c5cb0844a8ae3ed31db49a01e882e. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.

Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.

Open the recorded source website ↗

Record provenance

Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:record_usc_fe126ae69cad15eeb4687916
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code/title-2/section-1512-definitions--fce2da7679.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: dc32fba1d516fbe2a1a63c552e274018ceb2351e7ccd5fd0f2ea3175b6811263

Source location: Title 2, Chapter 25, § 1512; chapter-025-unfunded-mandates-reform.md

Stored source content

Cross-references

Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

2 U.S.C. § 1555 — Baseline study of costs and benefits

**(a) In general** No later than 18 months after March 22, 1995, the Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (hereafter in this subchapter referred to as the “Advisory Commission”), in consultation with the Director, shall complete a study to examine the measurement and definition issues involved in calculating the total costs and benefits to State, local, and tribal governments of compliance with Federal law. **(b) Considerations** The study required by this section shall consider— (1) the feasibility of measuring indirect costs and benefits as well as direct costs and benefits of the Federal, State, local, and tribal relationship; and (2) how to measure both the direct and indirect benefits of Federal financial assistance and tax benefits to State, local, and tribal governments.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 2 U.S.C. § 1555

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

2 U.S.C. § 1501 — Annual report to Congress regarding Federal court rulings

No later than 4 months after March 22, 1995, and no later than March 15 of each year thereafter, the Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations shall submit to the Congress, including the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Governmental Affairs of the Senate, and to the President a report describing any Federal court case to which a State, local, or tribal government was a party in the preceding calendar year that required such State, local, or tribal government to undertake responsibilities or activities, beyond those such government would otherwise have undertaken, to comply with Federal statutes and regulations.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 2 U.S.C. § 1501

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

2 U.S.C. § 658 — Study by Government Accountability Office of forms of Federal financial commitment not reviewed annually by Congress

The Government Accountability Office shall study those provisions of law which provide mandatory spending and report to the Congress its recommendations for the appropriate form of financing for activities or programs financed by such provisions not later than eighteen months after December 12, 1985. Such report shall be revised from time to time.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 2 U.S.C. § 658

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

2 U.S.C. § 1512 — Consideration for Federal funding

Page 356 TITLE 2—THE CONGRESS § 1511 (Pub. L. 104–4, § 5, Mar. 22, 1995, 109 Stat. 50.) Editorial Notes REFERENCES IN TEXT This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original ‘‘this Act’’, meaning Pub. L. 104–4, Mar. 22, 1995, 109 Stat. 48, known as the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1501 of this title and Tables. SUBCHAPTER I—LEGISLATIVE ACCOUNTABILITY AND REFORM § 1511. Cost of regulations (a) Sense of Congress It is the sense of the Congress that Federal agencies should review and evaluate planned regulations to ensure that the cost estimates provided by the Congressional Budget Office will be carefully considered as regulations are pro- mulgated. (b) Statement of cost At the request of a committee chairman or ranking minority member, the Director shall, to the extent practicable, prepare a comparison be- tween— (1) an estimate by the relevant agency, pre- pared under section 1532 of this title, of the costs of regulations implementing an Act con- taining a Federal mandate; and (2) the cost estimate prepared by the Con- gressional Budget Office for such Act when it was enacted by the Congress. (c) Cooperation of Office of Management and Budget At the request of the Director of the Congres- sional Budget Office, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall provide data and cost estimates for regulations implementing an Act containing a Federal mandate covered by part B of title IV of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 [2 U.S.C. 658 et seq.]. (Pub. L. 104–4, title I, § 103, Mar. 22, 1995, 109 Stat. 62.) Editorial Notes REFERENCES IN TEXT The Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act o

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 2 U.S.C. § 1512

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.