Arkansas Legal Resource Navigator

50 U.S.C. § 3352a — Reports and plans relating to security clearances and background investigations

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

50 U.S.C. § 3352a — Reports and plans relating to security clearances and background investigations

**(a) Sense of Congress** It is the sense of Congress that— (1) ensuring the trustworthiness and security of the workforce, facilities, and information of the Federal Government is of the highest priority to national security and public safety; (2) the President and Congress should prioritize the modernization of the personnel security framework to improve its efficiency, effectiveness, and accountability; (3) the current system for background investigations for security clearances, suitability and fitness for employment, and credentialing lacks efficiencies and capabilities to meet the current threat environment, recruit and retain a trusted workforce, and capitalize on modern technologies; and (4) changes to policies or processes to improve this system should be vetted through the Council to ensure standardization, portability, and reciprocity in security clearances across the Federal Government. **(b) Accountability plans and reports** (1) **Plans** — Not later than 90 days after December 20, 2019, the Council shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees and make available to appropriate industry partners the following: (A) A plan, with milestones, to reduce the background investigation inventory to 200,000, or an otherwise sustainable steady-level, by the end of year 2020. Such plan shall include notes of any required changes in investigative and adjudicative standards or resources. (B) A plan to consolidate the conduct of background investigations associated with the processing for security clearances in the most effective and efficient manner in the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency. Such plan shall address required funding, personnel, contracts, information technology, field office structure, policy, governance, schedule, tra

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 50 U.S.C. § 3352a

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.

Original supplied file — preserved unchanged

Download original Markdown file

File SHA-256: d77f937cc5541d3839252aa649476132283ee4289034405ff617a48774237bc1. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.

Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.

Open the recorded source website ↗

Record provenance

Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:record_usc_f7d710b5659c00d8f3754e18
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code/title-50/section-3352a-reports-and-plans-relating-to-security-clearances-and-background-investi--8dfb4b74f9.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: d3549879e46fda584bdc6b7a26f79205bdaffccf57d5d36bded098c6fefdbb6a

Source location: Title 50, Chapter 45, § 3352a; chapter-045-miscellaneous-intelligence-community-authorities.md

Stored source content

**(a) Sense of Congress** It is the sense of Congress that— (1) ensuring the trustworthiness and security of the workforce, facilities, and information of the Federal Government is of the highest priority to national security and public safety; (2) the President and Congress should prioritize the modernization of the personnel security framework to improve its efficiency, effectiveness, and accountability; (3) the current system for background investigations for security clearances, suitability and fitness for employment, and credentialing lacks efficiencies and capabilities to meet the current threat environment, recruit and retain a trusted workforce, and capitalize on modern technologies; and (4) changes to policies or processes to improve this system should be vetted through the Council to ensure standardization, portability, and reciprocity in security clearances across the Federal Government. **(b) Accountability plans and reports** (1) **Plans** — Not later than 90 days after December 20, 2019, the Council shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees and make available to appropriate industry partners the following: (A) A plan, with milestones, to reduce the background investigation inventory to 200,000, or an otherwise sustainable steady-level, by the end of year 2020. Such plan shall include notes of any required changes in investigative and adjudicative standards or resources. (B) A plan to consolidate the conduct of background investigations associated with the processing for security clearances in the most effective and efficient manner in the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency. Such plan shall address required funding, personnel, contracts, information technology, field office structure, policy, governance, schedule, transition costs, and effects on stakeholders. (2) **Report on the future of personnel security** (A) *In general* — Not later than 180 days after December 20, 2019, the Chairman of the Council, in coordination with the members of the Council, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees and make available to appropriate industry partners a report on the future of personnel security to reflect changes in threats, the workforce, and technology. (B) *Contents* — The report submitted under subparagraph (A) shall include the following: (i) A risk framework for granting and renewing access to classified information. (ii) A discussion of the use of technologies to prevent, detect, and monitor threats. (iii) A discussion of efforts to address reciprocity and portability. (iv) A discussion of the characteristics of effective insider threat programs. (v) An analysis of how to integrate data from continuous vetting, insider threat programs, and human resources data. (vi) Recommendations on interagency governance. (3) **Plan for implementation** — Not later than 180 days after December 20, 2019, the Chairman of the Council, in coordination with the members of the Council, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees and make available to appropriate industry partners a plan to implement the report’s framework and recommendations submitted under paragraph (2)(A). (4) **Congressional notifications** — Not less frequently than quarterly, the Security Executive Agent shall make available to the public a report regarding the status of the disposition of requests received from departments and agencies of the Federal Government for a change to, or approval under, the Federal investigative standards, the national adjudicative guidelines, continuous vetting, or other national policy regarding personnel security.

Cross-references

Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

50 U.S.C. § 3352 — Definitions

In this title: (1) **Appropriate congressional committees** — The term “appropriate congressional committees” means— (A) the congressional intelligence committees; (B) the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate; (C) the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; (D) the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate; (E) the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives; (F) the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives; (G) the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives; and (H) the Committee on Oversight and Reform of the House of Representatives. (2) **Appropriate industry partner** — The term “appropriate industry partner” means a contractor, licensee, or grantee (as defined in section 101(a) of Executive Order No. 12829 ([50 U.S.C. 3161](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title50-section3161&num=0&edition=prelim) note; relating to National Industrial Security Program)) that is participating in the National Industrial Security Program established by such Executive order. (3) **Continuous vetting** — The term “continuous vetting” has the meaning given such term in Executive Order No. 13467 ([50 U.S.C. 3161](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title50-section3161&num=0&edition=prelim) note; relating to reforming processes for determining suitability for government employment, fitness for contractor employees, and eligibility for access to classified national security information). (4) **Council** — The term “Council” means the Security, Suitability, and Credentialing Performance Accountability Council established pursuant to such Executive order, or any successor entity. (5) **Reciprocity** — The term “reciprocit

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 50 U.S.C. § 3352

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

50 U.S.C. § 3352a — Reports and plans relating to security

Page 829 TITLE 50—WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE § 3352a tional Intelligence, the classification decision shall be made by the Principal Deputy Direc- tor of National Intelligence. (c) Reports Whenever the Director or the Principal Dep- uty Director makes a decision under subsection (b), the Director or the Principal Deputy Direc- tor, as the case may be, shall submit to the con- gressional intelligence committees a report de- tailing the reasons for the decision. (Pub. L. 116–92, div. E, title LXIII, § 6310, Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 2190.) Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries DEFINITIONS For definitions of ‘‘intelligence community’’ and ‘‘congressional intelligence committees’’ as used in this section, see section 5003 of div. E of Pub. L. 116–92, set out as a note under section 3003 of this title. § 3352. Definitions In this title: (1) Appropriate congressional committees The term ‘‘appropriate congressional com- mittees’’ means— (A) the congressional intelligence commit- tees; (B) the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate; (C) the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; (D) the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate; (E) the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives; (F) the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives; (G) the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives; and (H) the Committee on Oversight and Re- form of the House of Representatives. (2) Appropriate industry partner The term ‘‘appropriate industry partner’’ means a contractor, licensee, or grantee (as defined in section 101(a) of Executive Order No. 12829 (50 U.S.C. 3161 note; relating to Na- tional Industrial Security Program)) that is participating in the National Industrial S

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 50 U.S.C. § 3352a

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.