Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
2 U.S.C. § 1966a — Protection of former Speakers of the House of Representatives
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Notwithstanding any other provision of law (except [section 1341 of title 31](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title31-section1341&num=0&edition=prelim)), hereafter, the United States Capitol Police shall perform a threat assessment for former Speakers of the House of Representatives, and if warranted, any such former Speaker shall receive a United States Capitol Police protective detail for a period of not more than one year beginning on the date they leave such office, except that such former Speaker shall have the option to decline such protective detail at any time: Provided, That at the conclusion of the one year period, the United States Capitol Police shall perform a threat assessment to determine whether extension of the protective detail is warranted: Provided further, That, the protective detail may be extended beyond the initial one year period, with the concurrence of the relevant former Speaker, if the United States Capitol Police determines that information or conditions, including but not limited to violent threats, warrant such protection: Provided further, That the United States Capitol Police is authorized to enter into Memoranda of Understanding with relevant state and local law enforcement agencies, as needed, to carry out this section.
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 2 U.S.C. § 1966a
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: 3a769c6cc45c8560698436fad1fad8cc3d35f4bb72ff1390c33482ecd9e3ee14. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:record_usc_980bdac2df2c0ba62716865f
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code/title-2/section-1966a-protection-of-former-speakers-of-the-house-of-representatives--c1c335836c.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 988d4af0908bb6cbcb6f3d12791cccbe62259eecc9e0ea85cb95e4b94c81eba5
Source location: Title 2, Chapter 29, § 1966a; chapter-029-capitol-police.md
Stored source content
Notwithstanding any other provision of law (except [section 1341 of title 31](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title31-section1341&num=0&edition=prelim)), hereafter, the United States Capitol Police shall perform a threat assessment for former Speakers of the House of Representatives, and if warranted, any such former Speaker shall receive a United States Capitol Police protective detail for a period of not more than one year beginning on the date they leave such office, except that such former Speaker shall have the option to decline such protective detail at any time: Provided, That at the conclusion of the one year period, the United States Capitol Police shall perform a threat assessment to determine whether extension of the protective detail is warranted: Provided further, That, the protective detail may be extended beyond the initial one year period, with the concurrence of the relevant former Speaker, if the United States Capitol Police determines that information or conditions, including but not limited to violent threats, warrant such protection: Provided further, That the United States Capitol Police is authorized to enter into Memoranda of Understanding with relevant state and local law enforcement agencies, as needed, to carry out this section.
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a)**
(1) Except as specified in this subchapter or any other provision of law, an officer or employee of the United States Government or of the District of Columbia government may not—
(A) make or authorize an expenditure or obligation exceeding an amount available in an appropriation or fund for the expenditure or obligation;
(B) involve either government in a contract or obligation for the payment of money before an appropriation is made unless authorized by law;
(C) make or authorize an expenditure or obligation of funds required to be sequestered under section 252 of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985; or
(D) involve either government in a contract or obligation for the payment of money required to be sequestered under section 252 of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985.
(2) This subsection does not apply to a corporation getting amounts to make loans (except paid in capital amounts) without legal liability of the United States Government.
**(b)** An article to be used by an executive department in the District of Columbia that could be bought out of an appropriation made to a regular contingent fund of the department may not be bought out of another amount available for obligation.
**(c)**
(1) In this subsection—
(A) the term “covered lapse in appropriations” means any lapse in appropriations that begins on or after December 22, 2018;
(B) the term “District of Columbia public employer” means—
(i) the District of Columbia Courts;
(ii) the Public Defender Service for the District of Columbia; or
(iii) the District of Columbia government;
(C) the term “employee” includes an officer; and
(D) the term “excepted employee” means an excepted employee or an employee performing
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 31 U.S.C. § 1341
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 435
TITLE 2—THE CONGRESS
§ 1967
§ 1966. Protection of Members of Congress, offi-
cers of Congress, and members of their fami-
lies
(a) Authority of the Capitol Police
Subject to the direction of the Capitol Police
Board, the United States Capitol Police is au-
thorized to protect, in any area of the United
States, the person of any Member of Congress,
officer of the Congress, as defined in section
4101(b) of this title, and any member of the im-
mediate family of any such Member or officer, if
the Capitol Police Board determines such pro-
tection to be necessary.
(b) Detail of police
In carrying out its authority under this sec-
tion, the Capitol Police Board, or its designee, is
authorized, in accordance with regulations
issued by the Board pursuant to this section, to
detail, on a case-by-case basis, members of the
United States Capitol Police to provide such
protection as the Board may determine nec-
essary under this section.
(c) Arrest of suspects
In the performance of their protective duties
under this section, members of the United
States Capitol Police are authorized (1) to make
arrests without warrant for any offense against
the United States committed in their presence,
or for any felony cognizable under the laws of
the United States if they have reasonable
grounds to believe that the person to be arrested
has committed or is committing such felony;
and (2) to utilize equipment and property of the
Capitol Police.
(d) Fines and penalties
Whoever knowingly and willfully obstructs,
resists, or interferes with a member of the Cap-
itol Police engaged in the performance of the
protective functions authorized by this section,
shall be fined not more than $300 or imprisoned
not more than one year, or both.
(e) Construction of pro
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 2 U.S.C. § 1966a
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.