Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
28 U.S.C. § 1927 — Counsel’s liability for excessive costs
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Any attorney or other person admitted to conduct cases in any court of the United States or any Territory thereof who so multiplies the proceedings in any case unreasonably and vexatiously may be required by the court to satisfy personally the excess costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees reasonably incurred because of such conduct.
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 28 U.S.C. § 1927
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: 8b95af99835d18b07aa976c3d59f66ae12f067b311541fc9b422adca96ef193a. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:record_usc_7947163d9a10738e5f5eb7be
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code/title-28/section-1927-counsels-liability-for-excessive-costs--d56e3e20fb.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 67b14ab53f7425838f9dd1c88927838d91eb9a9592231b13c837344c7bf0a40b
Source location: Title 28, Chapter 123, § 1927; chapter-123-fees-and-costs.md
Stored source content
Any attorney or other person admitted to conduct cases in any court of the United States or any Territory thereof who so multiplies the proceedings in any case unreasonably and vexatiously may be required by the court to satisfy personally the excess costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees reasonably incurred because of such conduct.
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
As used in this title:
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 28 U.S.C. § 451
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
For the purposes of this chapter—
**(a)** The term “antitrust law” includes:
(1) Each provision of law defined as one of the antitrust laws by [section 12 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section12&num=0&edition=prelim); and
(2) Any statute enacted on and after September 19, 1962, by the Congress which prohibits, or makes available to the United States in any court of the United States any civil remedy with respect to any restraint upon or monopolization of interstate or foreign trade or commerce;
**(b)** The term “antitrust order” means any final order, decree, or judgment of any court of the United States, duly entered in any case or proceeding arising under any antitrust law;
**(c)** The term “antitrust investigation” means any inquiry conducted by any antitrust investigator for the purpose of ascertaining whether any person is or has been engaged in any antitrust violation or in any activities in preparation for a merger, acquisition, joint venture, or similar transaction, which, if consummated, may result in an antitrust violation;
**(d)** The term “antitrust violation” means any act or omission in violation of any antitrust law, any antitrust order or, with respect to the International Antitrust Enforcement Assistance Act of 1994 [[15 U.S.C. 6201](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section6201&num=0&edition=prelim) et seq.], any of the foreign antitrust laws;
**(e)** The term “antitrust investigator” means any attorney or investigator employed by the Department of Justice who is charged with the duty of enforcing or carrying into effect any antitrust law;
**(f)** The term “person” means any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity, inclu
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 15 U.S.C. § 1311
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Incoming connection: Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Review of determination**
(1) **Review of certain determinations** — Within 30 days after the date of publication in the Federal Register of—
(A) a determination by the administering authority, under 1671a(c) 11 So in original. Probably should be preceded by “section”. or 1673a(c) of this title, not to initiate an investigation,
(B) a determination by the Commission, under [section 1675(b) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title19-section1675/b&num=0&edition=prelim), not to review a determination based upon changed circumstances,
(C) a negative determination by the Commission, under section 1671b(a) or 1673b(a) of this title, as to whether there is reasonable indication of material injury, threat of material injury, or material retardation, or
(D) a final determination by the administering authority or the Commission under [section 1675(c)(3) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title19-section1675/c/3&num=0&edition=prelim),
an interested party who is a party to the proceeding in connection with which the matter arises may commence an action in the United States Court of International Trade by filing concurrently a summons and complaint, each with the content and in the form, manner, and style prescribed by the rules of that court, contesting any factual findings or legal conclusions upon which the determination is based.
(2) **Review of determinations on record**
(A) *In general* — Within thirty days after—
(i) the date of publication in the Federal Register of—
(I) notice of any determination described in clause (ii), (iii), (iv), (v), or (viii) of subparagraph (B),
(II) an antidumping or countervailing duty order based upon any determination de
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 19 U.S.C. § 1516a
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Incoming connection: Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 489
TITLE 28—JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE
§ 1927
Editorial Notes
CODIFICATION
Pub. L. 95–598, title IV, § 408(c), Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat.
2687, as amended by Pub. L. 98–166, title II, § 200, Nov.
28, 1983, 97 Stat. 1081; Pub. L. 98–353, title III, § 323, July
10, 1984, 98 Stat. 358; Pub. L. 99–429, Sept. 30, 1986, 100
Stat. 985; Pub. L. 99–500, § 101(b) [title II, § 200], Oct. 18,
1986, 100 Stat. 1783–39, 1783–45, and Pub. L. 99–591, § 101(b)
[title II, § 200], Oct. 30, 1986, 100 Stat. 3341–39, 3341–45;
Pub. L. 99–554, title III, § 307(a), Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat.
3125, which provided for the deletion of any references
to United States Trustees in this title at a prospective
date, was repealed by Pub. L. 99–554, title III, § 307(b),
Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3125.
AMENDMENTS
1978—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 95–598 inserted ‘‘and United
States trustees’’ after ‘‘United States attorneys’’.
1954—Subsec. (a). Act June 18, 1954, inserted in first
item ‘‘including a default judgment whether entered by
the court or by the clerk’’ after ‘‘final hearing’’.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1978 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 95–598 effective Oct. 1, 1979,
see section 402(c) of Pub. L. 95–598, set out as an Effec-
tive Date note preceding section 101 of Title 11, Bank-
ruptcy.
§ 1924. Verification of bill of costs
Before any bill of costs is taxed, the party
claiming any item of cost or disbursement shall
attach thereto an affidavit, made by himself or
by his duly authorized attorney or agent having
knowledge of the facts, that such item is correct
and has been necessarily incurred in the case
and that the services for which fees have been
charged were actually and necessarily per-
formed.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat.
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 28 U.S.C. § 1927
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.