Arkansas Legal Resource Navigator

10 U.S.C. § 4231 — Major systems: determination of quantity for low-rate initial production

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

10 U.S.C. § 4231 — Major systems: determination of quantity for low-rate initial production

**(a) Determination of Quantities To Be Procured for Low-Rate Initial Production.—** (1) In the course of the development of a major system, the determination of what quantity of articles of that system should be procured for low-rate initial production (including the quantity to be procured for preproduction verification articles) shall be made— (A) when the milestone B decision with respect to that system is made; and (B) by the official of the Department of Defense who makes that decision. (2) In this section, the term “milestone B decision” means the decision to approve the system development and demonstration of a major system by the official of the Department of Defense designated to have the authority to make that decision. (3) Any increase from a quantity determined under paragraph (1) may only be made with the approval of the official making the determination. (4) The quantity of articles of a major system that may be procured for low-rate initial production may not be less than one operationally configured production unit unless another quantity is established at the milestone B decision. (5) The Secretary of Defense shall include a statement of the quantity determined under paragraph (1) in the first SAR submitted with respect to the program concerned after that quantity is determined. If the quantity exceeds 10 percent of the total number of articles to be produced, as determined at the milestone B decision with respect to that system, the Secretary shall include in the statement the reasons for such quantity. For purposes of this paragraph, the term “SAR” means a Selected Acquisition Report submitted under [section 4351 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title10-section4351&num=0&edition=prelim). **(b) Lo

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 4231

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.

Original supplied file — preserved unchanged

Download original Markdown file

File SHA-256: 05c6a7cdd2ae2fecddac2be669f1aebd05caa8d0215ee4c99c2b051ccbf9e69c. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.

Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.

Open the recorded source website ↗

Record provenance

Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:record_usc_65c5af0de29f0d1f04d256aa
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code/title-10/section-4231-major-systems-determination-of-quantity-for-low-rate-initial-production--325f5318cd.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 438b7d550b904e1701c945253daf08206b67a5bdaedc8304574719018b925f2e

Source location: Title 10, Chapter 322, § 4231; chapter-322-major-systems-and-major-defense-acquisition-programs-generally.md

Stored source content

**(a) Determination of Quantities To Be Procured for Low-Rate Initial Production.—** (1) In the course of the development of a major system, the determination of what quantity of articles of that system should be procured for low-rate initial production (including the quantity to be procured for preproduction verification articles) shall be made— (A) when the milestone B decision with respect to that system is made; and (B) by the official of the Department of Defense who makes that decision. (2) In this section, the term “milestone B decision” means the decision to approve the system development and demonstration of a major system by the official of the Department of Defense designated to have the authority to make that decision. (3) Any increase from a quantity determined under paragraph (1) may only be made with the approval of the official making the determination. (4) The quantity of articles of a major system that may be procured for low-rate initial production may not be less than one operationally configured production unit unless another quantity is established at the milestone B decision. (5) The Secretary of Defense shall include a statement of the quantity determined under paragraph (1) in the first SAR submitted with respect to the program concerned after that quantity is determined. If the quantity exceeds 10 percent of the total number of articles to be produced, as determined at the milestone B decision with respect to that system, the Secretary shall include in the statement the reasons for such quantity. For purposes of this paragraph, the term “SAR” means a Selected Acquisition Report submitted under [section 4351 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title10-section4351&num=0&edition=prelim). **(b) Low-Rate Initial Production of Weapon Systems.—** Except as provided in subsection (c), low-rate initial production with respect to a new system is production of the system in the minimum quantity necessary— (1) to provide production-configured or representative articles for operational tests pursuant to [section 4171 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title10-section4171&num=0&edition=prelim); (2) to establish an initial production base for the system; and (3) to permit an orderly increase in the production rate for the system sufficient to lead to full-rate production upon the successful completion of operational testing. **(c) Low-Rate Initial Production of Naval Vessel and Satellite Programs.—** With respect to naval vessel programs and military satellite programs, low-rate initial production is production of items at the minimum quantity and rate that (1) preserves the mobilization production base for that system, and (2) is feasible, as determined pursuant to regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense.

Cross-references

Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

10 U.S.C. § 4171 — Operational test and evaluation of defense acquisition programs

**(a) Condition for Proceeding Beyond Low-rate Initial Production.—** (1) The Secretary of Defense shall provide that a covered major defense acquisition program, a covered designated major subprogram, or an element of the ballistic missile defense system may not proceed beyond low-rate initial production until initial operational test and evaluation of the program, subprogram, or element is completed. (2) In this subsection: (A) The term “covered major defense acquisition program” means a major defense acquisition program that involves the acquisition of a weapon system that is a major system. (B) The term “covered designated major subprogram” means a major subprogram designated under [section 4203(a)(1) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title10-section4203/a/1&num=0&edition=prelim) that is a major subprogram of a covered major defense acquisition program. **(b) Operational Test and Evaluation.—** (1) Operational testing of a major defense acquisition program may not be conducted until the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation of the Department of Defense approves (in writing) the adequacy of the plans (including the projected level of funding) for operational test and evaluation to be conducted in connection with that program. (2) The Director shall analyze the results of the operational test and evaluation conducted for each major defense acquisition program. At the conclusion of such testing, the Director shall prepare a report stating— (A) the opinion of the Director as to— (i) whether the test and evaluation performed were adequate; and (ii) whether the results of such test and evaluation confirm that the items or components actually tested are effective and suitable for combat; and (B) add

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 4171

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

10 U.S.C. § 2220 — Performance based management: acquisition programs

**(a) Establishment of Goals.—** The Secretary of Defense shall approve or define the cost, performance, and schedule goals for major defense acquisition programs of the Department of Defense and for each phase of the acquisition cycle of such programs. **(b) Evaluation of Cost Goals.—** The Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) shall evaluate the cost goals proposed for each major defense acquisition program of the Department. **(c) Sunset.—** The authority under this section shall terminate on September 30, 2018.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 2220

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

10 U.S.C. § 3001 — Defense acquisition system; element of the defense acquisition system

**(a) Defense Acquisition System.—** In this part, the term “defense acquisition system” means— (1) the workforce engaged in carrying out the acquisition of property and services for the Department of Defense; (2) the management structure responsible for directing and overseeing the acquisition of property and services for the Department of Defense; and (3) the statutory, regulatory, and policy framework that guides the acquisition of property and services for the Department of Defense. **(b) Element of the Defense Acquisition System.—** In this part, the term “element of the defense acquisition system” means an organization that— (1) employs members of the acquisition workforce; (2) carries out acquisition functions; and (3) focuses primarily on acquisition. **(c) Acquisition.—** In this part, the term “acquisition” has the meaning provided in [section 131 of title 41](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title41-section131&num=0&edition=prelim).

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 3001

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

10 U.S.C. § 4351 — Selected Acquisition Reports

**(a)** In this section: (1) The term “program acquisition unit cost”, with respect to a major defense acquisition program, means the amount equal to (A) the total cost for development and procurement of, and system-specific military construction for, the acquisition program, divided by (B) the number of fully-configured end items to be produced for the acquisition program. (2) The term “procurement unit cost”, with respect to a major defense acquisition program, means the amount equal to (A) the total of all funds programmed to be available for obligation for procurement for the program, divided by (B) the number of fully-configured end items to be procured. (3) The term “major contract”, with respect to a major defense acquisition program, means each of the six largest prime, associate, or Government-furnished equipment contracts under the program that is in excess of $40,000,000 and that is not a firm, fixed price contract. (4) The term “full life-cycle cost”, with respect to a major defense acquisition program, means all costs of development, procurement, military construction, and operations and support, without regard to funding source or management control. **(b)** (1) The Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress at the end of each fiscal-year quarter a report on current major defense acquisition programs and any program that is estimated by the Secretary of Defense to require an eventual total expenditure for research, development, test, and evaluation of more than $300,000,000 (based on fiscal year 1990 constant dollars) or an eventual total expenditure for procurement, including all planned increments or spirals, of more than $1,800,000,000 (based on fiscal year 1990 constant dollars). Except as provided in paragraphs (2) and (3), each such report s

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 4351

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

10 U.S.C. § 2400 — Renumbered § 4231]

### Statutory Notes #### Prior Provisions A prior section 2400 was renumbered [section 4864 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title10-section4864&num=0&edition=prelim).

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 2400

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

10 U.S.C. § 3322 — Cost contracts

**(a) Cost-plus-a-percentage-of-cost System of Contracting Prohibited.—** The cost-plus-a-percentage-of-cost system of contracting may not be used. **(b) Cost-plus-a-fixed-fee Contracts.—** The fee for performing a cost-plus-a-fixed-fee contract for experimental, developmental, or research work may not be more than 15 percent of the estimated cost of the contract, not including the fee. The fee for performing a cost-plus-a-fixed-fee contract for architectural or engineering services for a public work or utility plus the cost of those services to the contractor may not be more than 6 percent of the estimated cost of that work or project, not including fees. The fee for performing any other cost-plus-a-fixed-fee contract may not be more than 10 percent of the estimated cost of the contract, not including the fee. Determinations under this subsection of the estimated costs of a contract or project shall be made by the head of the agency at the time the contract is made. **(c) Advance Notice of Certain Subcontracts.—** (1) **In general.—** — Except as provided in paragraph (2), each cost contract and each cost-plus-a-fixed-fee contract shall provide for notice to the agency by the contractor before the making, under the prime contract, of— (A) a cost-plus-a-fixed-fee subcontract; or (B) a fixed-price subcontract or purchase order involving more than the greater of (i) the simplified acquisition threshold, or (ii) 5 percent of the estimated cost of the prime contract. (2) **Exception.—** — Paragraph (1) shall not apply to a prime contract with a contractor that maintains a purchasing system approved by the contracting officer for the contract. **(d) Limitation on Certain Options.—** (1) **In general.—** — Except as provided by paragraph (2), a covered contract sh

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 3322

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Incoming connection: Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

10 U.S.C. § 4292 — Contracts: limitations on lead system integrators

**(a) In General.—** Except as provided in subsection (b), no entity performing lead system integrator functions in the acquisition of a major system by the Department of Defense may have any direct financial interest in the development or construction of any individual system or element of any system of systems. **(b) Exception.—** An entity described in subsection (a) may have a direct financial interest in the development or construction of an individual system or element of a system of systems if— (1) the Secretary of Defense certifies to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives that— (A) the entity was selected by the Department of Defense as a contractor to develop or construct the system or element concerned through the use of competitive procedures; and (B) the Department took appropriate steps to prevent any organizational conflict of interest in the selection process; or (2) the entity was selected by a subcontractor to serve as a lower-tier subcontractor, through a process over which the entity exercised no control. **(c) Construction.—** Nothing in this section shall be construed to preclude an entity described in subsection (a) from performing work necessary to integrate two or more individual systems or elements of a system of systems with each other.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 4292

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Incoming connection: Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

10 U.S.C. § 4231 — Major systems: determination of quantity

Page 2714 TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES § 4231 document the basis for the contract type selected for a program. The documentation shall include an expla- nation of the level of program risk for the program and, if the Milestone Decision Authority determines that the level of program risk is high, the steps that have been taken to reduce program risk and reasons for pro- ceeding with Milestone B approval despite the high level of program risk. ‘‘(f) CONDITIONS WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN LOW-RATE INITIAL PRODUCTION.— ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The number of low-rate initial production lots associated with a major defense ac- quisition program may not be more than one if— ‘‘(A) the milestone decision authority authorizes the use of a fixed-price type contract at the time of a decision on Milestone B approval; and ‘‘(B) the scope of the work of the fixed-price type contract includes both the development and low- rate initial production of items for such major de- fense acquisition program. ‘‘(2) WAIVER.—The limitation in paragraph (1) may be waived by the applicable service acquisition execu- tive or a designee of such executive if— ‘‘(A) such waiver authority is not delegated to the level of the contracting officer; and ‘‘(B) written notification of a granted waiver, in- cluding the associated rationale, is provided to the congressional defense committees [Committees on Armed Services and Appropriations of the Senate and the House of Representatives] not later than 30 days after issuance of the waiver. ‘‘(3) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection: ‘‘(A) The term ‘low-rate initial production’ has the meaning given under section 4231 of title 10, United States Code. ‘‘(B) The term ‘milestone decision authority’ has the meaning given in section 4211 of title 10, United States

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 10 U.S.C. § 4231

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.