Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
7 U.S.C. § 1359ii — Provisions applicable to producers
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Processor assurances**
(1) **In general** — If allotments for a crop year are allocated to processors under [section 1359dd of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title7-section1359dd&num=0&edition=prelim), the Secretary shall obtain from the processors such assurances as the Secretary considers adequate that the allocation will be shared among producers served by the processor in a fair and equitable manner that adequately reflects producers’ production histories.
(2) **Arbitration**
(A) *In general* — Any dispute between a processor and a producer, or group of producers, with respect to the sharing of the allocation to the processor shall be resolved through arbitration by the Secretary on the request of either party.
(B) *Period* — The arbitration shall, to the maximum extent practicable, be—
(i) commenced not more than 45 days after the request; and
(ii) completed not more than 60 days after the request.
**(b) Sugar beet processing facility closures**
(1) **In general** — If a sugar beet processing facility is closed and the sugar beet growers that previously delivered beets to the facility elect to deliver their beets to another processing company, the growers may petition the Secretary to modify allocations under this subpart to allow the delivery.
(2) **Increased allocation for processing company** — The Secretary may increase the allocation to the processing company to which the growers elect to deliver their sugar beets, with the approval of the processing company, to a level that does not exceed the processing capacity of the processing company, to accommodate the change in deliveries.
(3) **Decreased allocation for closed company** — The increased allocation shall be deducted from the allocation
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 7 U.S.C. § 1359ii
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: 3c70dc6a559c9fe5c368564ad4e07918ebefe90ad6dae97302ee512810615d16. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:record_usc_4382e686005e3422b1d5e366
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code/title-7/section-1359ii-provisions-applicable-to-producers--42adad8c3c.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 1152e1f7b867f167fa39210e5a5759639919c9d48b8f15998124372cef88d1e4
Source location: Title 7, Chapter 35, § 1359ii; chapter-035-agricultural-adjustment-act-of-1938.md
Stored source content
**(a) Processor assurances**
(1) **In general** — If allotments for a crop year are allocated to processors under [section 1359dd of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title7-section1359dd&num=0&edition=prelim), the Secretary shall obtain from the processors such assurances as the Secretary considers adequate that the allocation will be shared among producers served by the processor in a fair and equitable manner that adequately reflects producers’ production histories.
(2) **Arbitration**
(A) *In general* — Any dispute between a processor and a producer, or group of producers, with respect to the sharing of the allocation to the processor shall be resolved through arbitration by the Secretary on the request of either party.
(B) *Period* — The arbitration shall, to the maximum extent practicable, be—
(i) commenced not more than 45 days after the request; and
(ii) completed not more than 60 days after the request.
**(b) Sugar beet processing facility closures**
(1) **In general** — If a sugar beet processing facility is closed and the sugar beet growers that previously delivered beets to the facility elect to deliver their beets to another processing company, the growers may petition the Secretary to modify allocations under this subpart to allow the delivery.
(2) **Increased allocation for processing company** — The Secretary may increase the allocation to the processing company to which the growers elect to deliver their sugar beets, with the approval of the processing company, to a level that does not exceed the processing capacity of the processing company, to accommodate the change in deliveries.
(3) **Decreased allocation for closed company** — The increased allocation shall be deducted from the allocation to the company that owned the processing facility that has been closed and the remaining allocation shall be unaffected.
(4) **Timing** — The determinations of the Secretary on the issues raised by the petition shall be made within 60 days after the filing of the petition.
**(c) Proportionate shares of certain allotments**
(1) **Definition of seed**
(A) *In general* — In this subsection, the term “seed” means only those varieties of seed that are dedicated to the production of sugarcane from which is produced sugar for human consumption.
(B) *Exclusion* — The term “seed” does not include seed of a high-fiber cane variety dedicated to other uses, as determined by the Secretary.
(2) **In general**
(A) *States affected* — In any case in which a State allotment is established under [section 1359cc(f) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title7-section1359cc/f&num=0&edition=prelim) and there are in excess of 250 sugarcane producers in the State (other than Puerto Rico), the Secretary shall make a determination under subparagraph (B).
(B) *Determination* — The Secretary shall determine, for each State allotment described in subparagraph (A), whether the production of sugarcane, in the absence of proportionate shares, will be greater than the quantity needed to enable processors to fill the allotment and provide a normal carryover inventory of sugar.
(3) **Establishment of proportionate shares** — If the Secretary determines under paragraph (2) that the quantity of sugar produced from sugarcane produced by producers in the area covered by a State allotment for a crop year will be in excess of the quantity needed to enable processors to fill the allotment for the crop year and provide a normal carryover inventory of sugar, the Secretary shall establish a proportionate share for each sugarcane-producing farm that limits the acreage of sugarcane that may be harvested on the farm for sugar or seed during the crop year the allotment is in effect as provided in this subsection. Each such proportionate share shall be subject to adjustment under paragraph (8) and [section 1359cc(g) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title7-section1359cc/g&num=0&edition=prelim).
(4) **Method of determining** — For purposes of determining proportionate shares for any crop of sugarcane:
(A) The Secretary shall establish the State’s per-acre yield goal for a crop of sugarcane at a level (not less than the average per-acre yield in the State for the 2 highest years from among the 1999, 2000, and 2001 crop years, as determined by the Secretary) that will ensure an adequate net return per pound to producers in the State, taking into consideration any available production research data that the Secretary considers relevant.
(B) The Secretary shall adjust the per-acre yield goal by the average recovery rate of sugar produced from sugarcane by processors in the State.
(C) The Secretary shall convert the State allotment for the crop year involved into a State acreage allotment for the crop by dividing the State allotment by the per-acre yield goal for the State, as established under subparagraph (A) and as further adjusted under subparagraph (B).
(D) The Secretary shall establish a uniform reduction percentage for the crop by dividing the State acreage allotment, as determined for the crop under subparagraph (C), by the sum of all adjusted acreage bases in the State, as determined by the Secretary.
(E) The uniform reduction percentage for the crop, as determined under subparagraph (D), shall be applied to the acreage base for each sugarcane-producing farm in the State to determine the farm’s proportionate share of sugarcane acreage that may be harvested for sugar or seed.
(5) **Acreage base** — For purposes of this subsection, the acreage base for each sugarcane-producing farm shall be determined by the Secretary, as follows:
(A) The acreage base for any farm shall be the number of acres that is equal to the average of the acreage planted and considered planted for harvest for sugar or seed on the farm in the 2 highest of the 1999, 2000, and 2001 crop years.
(B) Acreage planted to sugarcane that producers on a farm were unable to harvest to sugarcane for sugar or seed because of drought, flood, other natural disaster, or other condition beyond the control of the producers may be considered as harvested for the production of sugar or seed for purposes of this paragraph.
(6) **Violation**
(A) *In general* — Whenever proportionate shares are in effect in a State for a crop of sugarcane, producers on a farm shall not knowingly harvest, or allow to be harvested, for sugar or seed an acreage of sugarcane in excess of the farm’s proportionate share for the crop year, or otherwise violate proportionate share regulations issued by the Secretary under [section 1359hh(a) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title7-section1359hh/a&num=0&edition=prelim).
(B) *Determination of violation* — No producer shall be considered to have violated subparagraph (A) unless the processor of the sugarcane harvested by such producer from acreage in excess of the proportionate share of the farm markets an amount of sugar that exceeds the allocation of such processor for a crop year.
(C) *Civil penalty* — Any producer on a farm who violates subparagraph (A) by knowingly harvesting, or allowing to be harvested, an acreage of sugarcane for sugar in excess of the farm’s proportionate share shall be liable to the Commodity Credit Corporation for a civil penalty equal to one and one-half times the United States market value of the quantity of sugar that is marketed by the processor of such sugarcane in excess of the allocation of such processor for the crop year. The Secretary shall prorate penalties imposed under this subparagraph in a fair and equitable manner among all the producers of sugarcane harvested from excess acreage that is acquired by such processor.
(7) **Waiver** — Notwithstanding the preceding subparagraph, the Secretary may authorize the county and State committees established under [section 590h(b) of title 16](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title16-section590h/b&num=0&edition=prelim) to waive or modify deadlines and other proportionate share requirements in cases in which lateness or failure to meet the other requirements does not affect adversely the operation of proportionate shares.
(8) **Adjustments** — Whenever the Secretary determines that, because of a natural disaster or other condition beyond the control of producers that adversely affects a crop of sugarcane subject to proportionate shares, the amount of sugar from sugarcane produced by producers subject to the proportionate shares will not be sufficient to enable processors in the State to meet the State’s cane sugar allotment and provide a normal carryover inventory of sugar, the Secretary may uniformly allow producers to harvest an amount of sugarcane in excess of their proportionate share, or suspend proportionate shares entirely, as necessary to enable processors to meet the State allotment and provide a normal carryover inventory of sugar.
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Definitions** In this section:
(1) **Agricultural commodity** — The term “agricultural commodity” has the meaning given the term in [section 5602 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title7-section5602&num=0&edition=prelim).
(2) **Geographically disadvantaged farmer or rancher** — The term “geographically disadvantaged farmer or rancher” has the meaning given the term in section 10906(a) of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 ([7 U.S.C. 2204](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title7-section2204&num=0&edition=prelim) note; Public Law 107–171).
**(b) Authorization** Subject to the availability of funds under subsection (d), the Secretary may provide geographically disadvantaged farmers or ranchers direct reimbursement payments for activities described in subsection (c).
**(c) Transportation**
(1) **In general** — Subject to paragraphs (2) and (3), the Secretary may provide direct reimbursement payments to a geographically disadvantaged farmer or rancher to transport an agricultural commodity, or inputs used to produce an agricultural commodity, during a fiscal year.
(2) **Proof of eligibility** — To be eligible to receive assistance under paragraph (1), a geographically disadvantaged farmer or rancher shall demonstrate to the Secretary that transportation of the agricultural commodity or inputs occurred over a distance of more than 30 miles, as determined by the Secretary.
(3) **Amount**
(A) *In general* — Subject to paragraph (2), the amount of direct reimbursement payments made to a geographically disadvantaged farmer or rancher under this section for a fiscal year shall equal the product obtained by multiplying—
(i) the amount of costs incurred by the geographically di
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 7 U.S.C. § 8701
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
In this subpart:
(1) **Human consumption** — The term “human consumption”, when used in the context of a reference to sugar (whether in the form of sugar, in-process sugar, syrup, molasses, or in some other form) for human consumption, includes sugar for use in human food, beverages, or similar products.
(2) **Mainland State** — The term “mainland State” means a State other than an offshore State.
(3) **Market**
(A) *In general* — The term “market” means to sell or otherwise dispose of in commerce in the United States.
(B) *Inclusions* — The term “market” includes—
(i) the forfeiture of sugar under the loan program for sugar established under [section 7272 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title7-section7272&num=0&edition=prelim);
(ii) with respect to any integrated processor and refiner, the movement of raw cane sugar into the refining process; and
(iii) the sale of sugar for the production of ethanol or other bioenergy product, if the disposition of the sugar is administered by the Secretary under [section 8110 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title7-section8110&num=0&edition=prelim).
(C) *Marketing year* — Forfeited sugar described in subparagraph (B)(i) shall be considered to have been marketed during the crop year for which a loan is made under the loan program described in that subparagraph.
(4) **Offshore State** — The term “offshore State” means a sugarcane producing State located outside of the continental United States.
(5) **State** — Notwithstanding [section 1301 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title7-section1301&num=0&edition=prelim), the term “State” means—
(A) a State;
(B) the District of Colum
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 7 U.S.C. § 1359dd
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Allocation to processors** Whenever marketing allotments are established for a crop year under [section 1359cc of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title7-section1359cc&num=0&edition=prelim), in order to afford all interested persons an equitable opportunity to market sugar under an allotment, the Secretary shall allocate each such allotment among the processors covered by the allotment.
**(b) Hearing and notice**
(1) **Cane sugar**
(A) *In general* — The Secretary shall make allocations for cane sugar after a hearing, if requested by the affected sugarcane processors and growers, and on such notice as the Secretary by regulation may prescribe, in such manner and in such quantities as to provide a fair, efficient, and equitable distribution of the allocations under this paragraph. Each such allocation shall be subject to adjustment under [section 1359cc(g) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title7-section1359cc/g&num=0&edition=prelim).
(B) *Multiple processor States* — Except as provided in subparagraphs (C) and (D), the Secretary shall allocate the allotment for cane sugar among multiple cane sugar processors in a single State based on—
(i) past marketings of sugar, based on the average of the 2 highest years of production of raw cane sugar from among the 1996 through 2000 crops;
(ii) the ability of processors to market sugar covered by that portion of the allotment allocated for the crop year; and
(iii) past processings of sugar from sugarcane, based on the average of the 3 highest years of production during the 1996 through 2000 crop years.
(C) *Talisman processing facility* — In the case of allotments under subparagraph (B) attributable to the operations o
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 7 U.S.C. § 1359gg
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Incoming connection: Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 672
TITLE 7—AGRICULTURE
§ 1359hh
ble allocation that equals the contribution
of the grower to allocation of the processing
company for the sugarcane acreage base
being transferred.
(Feb. 16, 1938, ch. 30, title III, § 359g, as added
Pub. L. 107–171, title I, § 1403, May 13, 2002, 116
Stat. 201; amended Pub. L. 110–234, title I,
§ 1403(g), May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 987; Pub. L.
110–246, § 4(a), title I, § 1403(g), June 18, 2008, 122
Stat. 1664, 1715.)
Editorial Notes
CODIFICATION
Pub. L. 110–234 and Pub. L. 110–246 made identical
amendments to this section. The amendments by Pub.
L. 110–234 were repealed by section 4(a) of Pub. L.
110–246.
PRIOR PROVISIONS
A prior section 1359gg, act Feb. 16, 1938, ch. 30, title
III, § 359g, as added Pub. L. 101–624, title IX, § 902, Nov.
28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3486; amended Pub. L. 102–237, title I,
§ 111(i), Dec. 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 1835, related to special
rules, prior to the general amendment of this subpart
by Pub. L. 107–171.
AMENDMENTS
2008—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 110–246, § 1403(g)(1), added
subsec. (a) and struck out former subsec. (a). Prior to
amendment, text read as follows: ‘‘For the purpose of
establishing proportionate shares for sugarcane farms
under section 1359ff(c) of this title, the Secretary, on
application of any producer, with the written consent
of all owners of a farm, may transfer the acreage base
history of the farm to any other parcels of land of the
applicant.’’
Subsec. (d)(1). Pub. L. 110–246, § 1403(g)(2)(A), inserted
‘‘affected’’ before ‘‘crop-share owners’’ in two places
and struck out ‘‘, and from the processing company
holding the applicable allocation for such shares,’’ be-
fore ‘‘may deliver’’.
Subsec. (d)(2). Pub. L. 110–246, § 1403(g)(2)(B), struck
out ‘‘the product
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 7 U.S.C. § 1359ii
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.