Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections

50 U.S.C. § 2523c — Transferred

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

50 U.S.C. § 2523c — Transferred

### Statutory Notes #### Codification Section, Pub. L. 112–81, div. A, title X, § 1045, Dec. 31, 2011, 125 Stat. 1577; Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title X, § 1076(a)(19), Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 1949, which related to nuclear force reductions, was transferred to [section 494 of Title 10](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title10-section494&num=0&edition=prelim), Armed Forces, by Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title X, § 1033(b)(1)(A)–(C), Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 1920.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 50 U.S.C. § 2523c

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.

Original supplied file — preserved unchanged

Download original Markdown file

File SHA-256: 25ef92628c66f98991dba000b5b319f409561a8e5c7e6d40ec1013a067a89f8b. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.

Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.

Open the recorded source website ↗

Record provenance

Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:record_usc_1d151c82178b3ec71d5e8492
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code/title-50/section-2523c-transferred--fd48688b62.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: d740a49528d8c2ba17a4a361dcd6b18eef45113dc6e204c6fb010bb115a76dc8

Source location: Title 50, Chapter 42, § 2523c; chapter-042-atomic-energy-defense-provisions.md

Stored source content

Cross-references

Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

10 U.S.C. § 494 — Nuclear force reductions

**(a) Implementation of New START Treaty.—** (1) **Sense of congress.—** — It is the Sense of Congress that— (A) the United States is committed to maintaining a safe, secure, reliable, and credible nuclear deterrent; (B) the United States should undertake and support an enduring stockpile stewardship program and maintain and modernize nuclear weapons production capabilities and capacities to ensure the safety, security, reliability, and credibility of the United States nuclear deterrent and to meet requirements for hedging against possible international developments or technical problems; (C) the United States should maintain nuclear weapons laboratories and plants and preserve the intellectual infrastructure, including competencies and skill sets; and (D) the United States should provide the necessary resources to achieve these goals, using as a starting point the levels set forth in the President’s 10-year plan provided to Congress pursuant to section 1251 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2549). (2) **Insufficient funding.—** (A) *Report.—* — During each year in which the New START Treaty is in force, if the President determines that an appropriations Act is enacted that fails to meet the resource levels set forth in the November 2010 update to the plan referred to in section 1251 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2549) or if at any time determines that more resources are required to carry out such plan than were estimated, the President shall transmit to the appropriate congressional committees, within 60 days of making such a determination, a report detailing— (i) a plan to address the resource shortfall; (ii) if more reso

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 494

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

10 U.S.C. § 6115 — Major warhead refurbishment program

In fiscal year 2015 and subsequent fiscal years, the Secretary of Energy shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report, on each major warhead refurbishment program that reaches the Phase 6.3 milestone, that provides an analysis of alternatives. Such report shall include— (1) a full description of alternatives considered prior to the award of Phase 6.3; (2) a comparison of the costs and benefits of each of those alternatives, to include an analysis of trade-offs among cost, schedule, and performance objectives against each alternative considered; (3) identification of the cost and risk of critical technology elements associated with each alternative, including technology maturity, integration risk, manufacturing feasibility, and demonstration needs; (4) identification of the cost and risk of additional capital asset and infrastructure capabilities required to support production and certification of each alternative; (5) a comparative analysis of the risks, costs, and scheduling needs for any military requirement intended to enhance warhead safety, security, or maintainability, including any requirement to consolidate and/or integrate warhead systems or mods as compared to at least one other feasible refurbishment alternative the Nuclear Weapons Council considers appropriate; and (6) a life-cycle cost estimate for the alternative selected that details the overall cost, scope, and schedule planning assumptions.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 6115

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Incoming connection: Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

50 U.S.C. § 2523c — Major warhead refurbishment program

Page 435 TITLE 50—WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE § 2523c 1 So in original. Probably should be ‘‘10 U.S.C. 101(a)(16)’’. ‘‘(1) the President should maintain the stated posi- tion of the United States that the follow-on treaty to the START Treaty not include any limitations on the ballistic missile defense systems, space capabilities, or advanced conventional weapons systems of the United States; ‘‘(2) the enhanced safety, security, and reliability of the nuclear weapons stockpile, modernization of the nuclear weapons complex, and maintenance of the nu- clear delivery systems are key to enabling further re- ductions in the nuclear forces of the United States; and ‘‘(3) the President should submit budget requests for fiscal year 2011 and subsequent fiscal years for the programs of the National Nuclear Security Adminis- tration of the Department of Energy that are ade- quate to sustain the needed capabilities to support the long-term maintenance of the nuclear stockpile of the United States.’’ INCLUSION IN 2005 STOCKPILE STEWARDSHIP PLAN OF CERTAIN INFORMATION RELATING TO STOCKPILE STEW- ARDSHIP CRITERIA Pub. L. 108–136, div. C, title XXXI, § 3133, Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1751, provided that: ‘‘(a) INCLUSION IN 2005 STOCKPILE STEWARDSHIP PLAN.—In submitting to Congress the updated version of the 2005 stockpile stewardship plan, the Secretary of Energy shall include the matters specified in sub- section (b). ‘‘(b) MATTERS INCLUDED.—The matters referred to in subsection (a) are the following: ‘‘(1) An update of any information or criteria de- scribed in the report on stockpile stewardship cri- teria submitted under section 4202 of the Atomic En- ergy Defense Act [50 U.S.C. 2522] (as transferred and redesignated by section 3161(e)(3) [probably should be

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 50 U.S.C. § 2523c

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.