Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
33 U.S.C. § 652 — Upper Mississippi River Management
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Short title; Congressional declaration of intent**
(1) This section may be cited as the “Upper Mississippi River Management Act of 1986”.
(2) To ensure the coordinated development and enhancement of the Upper Mississippi River system, it is hereby declared to be the intent of Congress to recognize that system as a nationally significant ecosystem and a nationally significant commercial navigation system. Congress further recognizes that the system provides a diversity of opportunities and experiences. The system shall be administered and regulated in recognition of its several purposes.
**(b) Definitions** For purposes of this section—
(1) the terms “Upper Mississippi River system” and “system” mean those river reaches having commercial navigation channels on the Mississippi River main stem north of Cairo, Illinois; the Minnesota River, Minnesota; Black River, Wisconsin; Saint Croix River, Minnesota and Wisconsin; Illinois River and Waterway, Illinois; and Kaskaskia River, Illinois;
(2) the term “Master Plan” means the comprehensive master plan for the management of the Upper Mississippi River system, dated January 1, 1982, prepared by the Upper Mississippi River Basin Commission and submitted to Congress pursuant to Public Law 95–502;
(3) the term “GREAT I, GREAT II, and GRRM studies” means the studies entitled “GREAT Environmental Action Team—GREAT I—A Study of the Upper Mississippi River”, dated September 1980, “GREAT River Environmental Action Team—GREAT II—A Study of the Upper Mississippi River”, dated December 1980, and “GREAT River Resource Management Study”, dated September 1982; and
(4) the term “Upper Mississippi River Basin Association” means an association of the States of Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, and Wisconsin, formed for the purpos
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 33 U.S.C. § 652
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: 8a0e75abd3946d634e3dc11da1630140f027d59281e7e66542313ac6b97f4a81. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:record_usc_0b412562150a6b279d825a83
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code/title-33/section-652-upper-mississippi-river-management--044b5e479f.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: acb58affb5d6c1cf9287963004c2e5dc60c44a4e252fa1a1dfb6b13a14dd30f1
Source location: Title 33, Chapter 13, § 652; chapter-013-mississippi-river-commission.md
Stored source content
**(a) Short title; Congressional declaration of intent**
(1) This section may be cited as the “Upper Mississippi River Management Act of 1986”.
(2) To ensure the coordinated development and enhancement of the Upper Mississippi River system, it is hereby declared to be the intent of Congress to recognize that system as a nationally significant ecosystem and a nationally significant commercial navigation system. Congress further recognizes that the system provides a diversity of opportunities and experiences. The system shall be administered and regulated in recognition of its several purposes.
**(b) Definitions** For purposes of this section—
(1) the terms “Upper Mississippi River system” and “system” mean those river reaches having commercial navigation channels on the Mississippi River main stem north of Cairo, Illinois; the Minnesota River, Minnesota; Black River, Wisconsin; Saint Croix River, Minnesota and Wisconsin; Illinois River and Waterway, Illinois; and Kaskaskia River, Illinois;
(2) the term “Master Plan” means the comprehensive master plan for the management of the Upper Mississippi River system, dated January 1, 1982, prepared by the Upper Mississippi River Basin Commission and submitted to Congress pursuant to Public Law 95–502;
(3) the term “GREAT I, GREAT II, and GRRM studies” means the studies entitled “GREAT Environmental Action Team—GREAT I—A Study of the Upper Mississippi River”, dated September 1980, “GREAT River Environmental Action Team—GREAT II—A Study of the Upper Mississippi River”, dated December 1980, and “GREAT River Resource Management Study”, dated September 1982; and
(4) the term “Upper Mississippi River Basin Association” means an association of the States of Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, and Wisconsin, formed for the purposes of cooperative effort and united assistance in the comprehensive planning for the use, protection, growth, and development of the Upper Mississippi River System.
**(c) Congressional approval of Master Plan**
(1) Congress hereby approves the Master Plan as a guide for future water policy on the Upper Mississippi River system. Such approval shall not constitute authorization of any recommendation contained in the Master Plan.
(2) Omitted.
**(d) Cooperative effort and mutual assistance among States**
(1) The consent of the Congress is hereby given to the States of Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, and Wisconsin, or any two or more of such States, to enter into negotiations for agreements, not in conflict with any law of the United States, for cooperative effort and mutual assistance in the comprehensive planning for the use, protection, growth, and development of the Upper Mississippi River system, and to establish such agencies, joint or otherwise, or designate an existing multi-State entity, as they may deem desirable for making effective such agreements. To the extent required by Article I, section 10 of the Constitution, such agreements shall become final only after ratification by an Act of Congress.
(2) The Secretary is authorized to enter into cooperative agreements with the Upper Mississippi River Basin Association or any other agency established under paragraph (1) of this subsection to promote and facilitate active State government participation in the river system management, development, and protection.
(3) For the purpose of ensuring the coordinated planning and implementation of programs authorized in subsections (e) and (h)(2) of this section, the Secretary shall enter into an interagency agreement with the Secretary of the Interior to provide for the direct participation of, and transfer of funds to, the Fish and Wildlife Service and any other agency or bureau of the Department of the Interior for the planning, design, implementation, and evaluation of such programs.
(4) The Upper Mississippi River Basin Association or any other agency established under paragraph (1) of this subsection is hereby designated by Congress as the caretaker of the master plan. Any changes to the master plan recommended by the Secretary shall be submitted to such association or agency for review. Such association or agency may make such comments with respect to such recommendations and offer other recommended changes to the master plan as such association or agency deems appropriate and shall transmit such comments and other recommended changes to the Secretary. The Secretary shall transmit such recommendations along with the comments and other recommended changes of such association or agency to the Congress for approval within 90 days of the receipt of such comments or recommended changes.
**(e) Program authority**
(1) **Authority.—**
(A) *In general.—* — The Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of the Interior and the States of Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, and Wisconsin, may undertake, as identified in the master plan—
(i) a program for the planning, construction, and evaluation of measures for fish and wildlife habitat rehabilitation and enhancement; and
(ii) implementation of a long-term resource monitoring, computerized data inventory and analysis, and applied research program, including research on water quality issues affecting the Mississippi River (including elevated nutrient levels) and the development of remediation strategies.
(B) *Advisory committee.—* — In carrying out subparagraph (A)(i), the Secretary shall establish an independent technical advisory committee to review projects, monitoring plans, and habitat and natural resource needs assessments.
(2) **Reports.—** — Not later than December 31, 2004, and not later than December 31 of every sixth year thereafter, the Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of the Interior and the States of Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, and Wisconsin, shall submit to Congress a report that—
(A) contains an evaluation of the programs described in paragraph (1);
(B) describes the accomplishments of each of the programs;
(C) provides updates of a systemic habitat needs assessment; and
(D) identifies any needed adjustments in the authorization of the programs.
(3) For purposes of carrying out paragraph (1)(A)(i) of this subsection, there is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary $75,000,000 for fiscal year 1999 and each fiscal year thereafter.
(4) For purposes of carrying out paragraph (1)(A)(ii) of this subsection, there is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary $15,000,000 for each of fiscal years 1999 through 2024, and $25,000,000 for fiscal year 2025 and each fiscal year thereafter.
(5) **Authorization of appropriations.—** — There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out paragraph (1)(B) $350,000 for each of fiscal years 1999 through 2009.
(6) **Transfer of amounts.—** — For fiscal year 1999 and each fiscal year thereafter, the Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of the Interior and the States of Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, and Wisconsin, may transfer not to exceed 20 percent of the amounts appropriated to carry out clause (i) or (ii) of paragraph (1)(A) to the amounts appropriated to carry out the other of those clauses.
(7)
(A) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (a)(2) of this section, the costs of each project carried out pursuant to paragraph (1)(A)(i) of this subsection shall be allocated between the Secretary and the appropriate non-Federal sponsor in accordance with the provisions of [section 2283(e) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title33-section2283/e&num=0&edition=prelim); except that the costs of operation and maintenance of projects located on Federal lands or lands owned or operated by a State or local government shall be borne by the Federal, State, or local agency that is responsible for management activities for fish and wildlife on such lands and, in the case of any project requiring non-Federal cost sharing, the non-Federal share of the cost of the project shall be 35 percent.
(B) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (a)(2) of this section, the cost of implementing the activities authorized by paragraph (1)(A)(ii) of this subsection shall be allocated in accordance with the provisions of [section 2283 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title33-section2283&num=0&edition=prelim), as if such activity was required to mitigate losses to fish and wildlife.
(8) None of the funds appropriated pursuant to any authorization contained in this subsection shall be considered to be chargeable to navigation.
**(f) Recreational projects authority**
(1) The Secretary, in consultation with any agency established under subsection (d)(1) of this section, is authorized to implement a program of recreational projects for the system substantially in accordance with the recommendations of the GREAT I, GREAT II, and GRRM studies and the master plan reports. In addition, the Secretary, in consultation with any such agency, shall, at Federal expense, conduct an assessment of the economic benefits generated by recreational activities in the system. The cost of each such project shall be allocated between the Secretary and the appropriate non-Federal sponsor in accordance with title I of this Act [[33 U.S.C. 2211](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title33-section2211&num=0&edition=prelim) et seq.].
(2) For purposes of carrying out the program of recreational projects authorized in paragraph (1) of this subsection, there is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary not to exceed $500,000 per fiscal year for each of the first 15 fiscal years beginning after November 17, 1986.
**(g) Increases in lock capacity** The Secretary shall, in his budget request, identify those measures developed by the Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of Transportation and any agency established under subsection (d)(1) of this section, to be undertaken to increase the capacity of specific locks throughout the system by employing nonstructural measures and making minor structural improvements.
**(h) Monitoring of traffic movements**
(1) The Secretary, in consultation with any agency established under subsection (d)(1) of this section, shall monitor traffic movements on the system for the purpose of verifying lock capacity, updating traffic projections, and refining the economic evaluation so as to verify the need for future capacity expansion of the system.
(2) **Determination.—**
(A) *In general.—* — The Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of the Interior and the States of Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, and Wisconsin, shall determine the need for river rehabilitation and environmental enhancement and protection based on the condition of the environment, project developments, and projected environmental impacts from implementing any proposals resulting from recommendations made under subsection (g) and paragraph (1) of this subsection.
(B) *Requirements.—* — The Secretary shall—
(i) complete the ongoing habitat needs assessment conducted under this paragraph not later than September 30, 2000; and
(ii) include in each report under subsection (e)(2) the most recent habitat needs assessment conducted under this paragraph.
(3) There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary such sums as may be necessary to carry out this subsection.
**(i) Disposal of dredged material**
(1) The Secretary shall, as he determines feasible, dispose of dredged material from the system pursuant to the recommendations of the GREAT I, GREAT II, and GRRM studies.
(2) The Secretary shall establish and request appropriate Federal funding for a program to facilitate productive uses of dredged material. The Secretary shall work with the States which have, within their boundaries, any part of the system to identify potential users of dredged material.
**(j) Construction of second lock at locks and dam 26, Mississippi River, Alton, Illinois and Missouri** The Secretary is authorized to provide for the engineering, design, and construction of a second lock at locks and dam 26, Mississippi River, Alton, Illinois and Missouri, at a total cost of $220,000,000, with a first Federal cost of $220,000,000. Such second lock shall be one hundred and ten feet by six hundred feet and shall be constructed at or in the vicinity of the location of the replacement lock authorized by section 102 of Public Law 95–502. [Section 2212 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title33-section2212&num=0&edition=prelim) shall apply to the project authorized by this subsection.
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Upon receipt of a plan or revision thereof from any river basin commission under the provisions of [section 1962b–3(3) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title42-section1962b–3/3&num=0&edition=prelim), the Council shall review the plan or revision with special regard to—
(1) the efficacy of such plan or revision in achieving optimum use of the water and related land resources in the area involved;
(2) the effect of the plan on the achievement of other programs for the development of agricultural, urban, energy, industrial, recreational, fish and wildlife, and other resources of the entire Nation; and
(3) the contributions which such plan or revision will make in obtaining the Nation’s economic and social goals.
Based on such review the Council shall—
**(a)** formulate such recommendations as it deems desirable in the national interest; and
**(b)** transmit its recommendations, together with the plan or revision of the river basin commission and the views, comments, and recommendations with respect to such plan or revision submitted by any Federal agency, Governor, interstate commission, or United States section of an international commission, to the President for his review and transmittal to the Congress with his recommendations in regard to authorization of Federal projects.
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 42 U.S.C. § 1962b–3
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
In any case in which a project under the jurisdiction of the Secretary is budgeted under a different business line than the business line under which the project was originally authorized, the Secretary shall ensure that the project is carried out in accordance with any requirements that apply to the business line under which the project was originally authorized.
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 33 U.S.C. § 2201
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Flood control**
(1) **General rule** — The non-Federal interests for a project with costs assigned to flood control (other than a nonstructural project) shall—
(A) pay 5 percent of the cost of the project assigned to flood control during construction of the project;
(B) provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas required only for flood control and perform all related necessary relocations; and
(C) provide that portion of the joint costs of lands, easements, rights-of-way, dredged material disposal areas, and relocations which is assigned to flood control.
(2) **35 percent minimum contribution** — If the value of the contributions required under paragraph (1) of this subsection is less than 35 percent of the cost of the project assigned to flood control, the non-Federal interest shall pay during construction of the project such additional amounts as are necessary so that the total contribution of the non-Federal interests under this subsection is equal to 35 percent of the cost of the project assigned to flood control.
(3) **50 percent maximum** — The non-Federal share under paragraph (1) shall not exceed 50 percent of the cost of the project assigned to flood control. The preceding sentence does not modify the requirement of paragraph (1)(A) of this subsection.
(4) **Deferred payment of amount exceeding 30 percent** — If the total amount of the contribution required under paragraph (1) of this subsection exceeds 30 percent of the cost of the project assigned to flood control, the non-Federal interests may pay the amount of the excess to the Secretary over a 15-year period (or such shorter period as may be agreed to by the Secretary and the non-Federal interests) beginning on the date construction of the project or
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 33 U.S.C. § 2215
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Resiliency assessment**
(1) **In general** — Not later than 180 days after December 27, 2020, and in conjunction with the development of procedures under [section 1962–4 of title 42](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title42-section1962–4&num=0&edition=prelim), the Secretary is directed to review, and where appropriate, revise the existing planning guidance documents and regulations of the Corps of Engineers on the assessment of the effects of sea level rise or inland flooding on future water resources development projects to ensure that such guidance documents and regulations are based on the best available, peer-reviewed science and data on the current and future effects of sea level rise or inland flooding on relevant communities.
(2) **Coordination** — In carrying out this subsection, the Secretary shall—
(A) coordinate the review with the Engineer Research and Development Center, other Federal and State agencies, and other relevant entities; and
(B) to the maximum extent practicable and where appropriate, utilize data provided to the Secretary by such agencies.
**(b) Assessment of benefits from addressing sea level rise and inland flooding resiliency in feasibility reports**
(1) **In general** — Upon the request of a non-Federal interest, in carrying out a feasibility study for a project for flood risk mitigation, hurricane and storm damage risk reduction, or ecosystem restoration under [section 2282 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title33-section2282&num=0&edition=prelim), the Secretary shall consider whether the need for the project is predicated upon or exacerbated by conditions related to sea level rise or inland flooding.
(2) **Addressing sea level rise and inland flooding
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 33 U.S.C. § 2283
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
For purposes of this Act, the term “Secretary” means the Secretary of the Army.
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 33 U.S.C. § 2211
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Review of contractual agreements**
(1) **In general** — Not later than 180 days after December 27, 2020, the Secretary shall complete a review of the policies, guidelines, and regulations of the Corps of Engineers for the development of contractual agreements between the Secretary and non-Federal interests and utilities associated with the construction of water resources development projects.
(2) **Report** — Not later than 90 days after completing the review under subsection (a)(1), the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate, and make publicly available, a report that includes—
(A) a summary of the results of the review; and
(B) public guidance on best practices for a non-Federal interest to use when writing or developing contractual agreements with the Secretary and utilities.
(3) **Provision of guidance** — The Secretary shall provide the best practices guidance included under paragraph (2)(A) to non-Federal interests prior to the development of contractual agreements with such non-Federal interests.
**(b) Sense of Congress** It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary should maximize use of nonprice tradeoff procedures in competitive acquisitions for carrying out emergency work in an area with respect to which the President has declared a major disaster under [section 5170 of title 42](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title42-section5170&num=0&edition=prelim).
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 33 U.S.C. § 2212
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
The Council is authorized to delegate to any member or employee of the Council its administrative functions under [section 1962a–4 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title42-section1962a-4&num=0&edition=prelim) and the detailed administration of the grant program under subchapter III.
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 42 U.S.C. § 1962d–5b
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Explicit cross-reference supplied in source Markdown; currentness and applicability require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 701
TITLE 33—NAVIGATION AND NAVIGABLE WATERS
§ 2211
ment of contractual agreements with such
non-Federal interests.
(b) Sense of Congress
It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary
should maximize use of nonprice tradeoff proce-
dures in competitive acquisitions for carrying
out emergency work in an area with respect to
which the President has declared a major dis-
aster under section 5170 of title 42.
(Pub. L. 116–260, div. AA, title I, § 136, Dec. 27,
2020, 134 Stat. 2649.)
Editorial Notes
CODIFICATION
Section was enacted as part of the Water Resources
Development Act of 2020, and not as part of the Water
Resources Development Act of 1986 which comprises
this chapter.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
‘‘SECRETARY’’ DEFINED
Secretary means the Secretary of the Army, see sec-
tion 2 of div. AA of Pub. L. 116–260, set out as a note
under section 2201 of this title.
SUBCHAPTER I—COST SHARING
§ 2211. Harbors
(a) Construction
(1) Payments during construction
The non-Federal interests for a navigation
project for a harbor or inland harbor, or any
separable element thereof, on which a con-
tract for physical construction has not been
awarded before June 10, 2014, shall pay, during
the period of construction of the project, the
following costs associated with general navi-
gation features:
(A) 10 percent of the cost of construction
of the portion of the project which has a
depth not in excess of 20 feet; plus
(B) 25 percent of the cost of construction of
the portion of the project which has a depth
in excess of 20 feet but not in excess of 55
feet; plus
(C) 50 percent of the cost of construction of
the portion of the project which has a depth
in excess of 55 feet.
(2) Additional 10 percent payment over 30
years
The non-Fede
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 33 U.S.C. § 2211
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 33 U.S.C. § 2211. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 168
TITLE 33—NAVIGATION AND NAVIGABLE WATERS
§ 651
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
CHANGE OF NAME
Department of War designated Department of the
Army and title of Secretary of War changed to Sec-
retary of the Army by section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947,
ch. 343, title II, 61 Stat. 501. Section 205(a) of act July
26, 1947, was repealed by section 53 of act Aug. 10, 1956,
ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 641. Section 1 of act Aug. 10, 1956, en-
acted ‘‘Title 10, Armed Forces’’ which in sections 3010
to 3013 continued Department of the Army under ad-
ministrative supervision of Secretary of the Army.
§ 651. Tributaries of Mississippi River below
Cairo; levee and bank protection
The jurisdiction of the Mississippi River Com-
mission is extended, for the purposes of levee
protection and bank protection, to the tribu-
taries and outlets of the Mississippi River be-
tween Cairo, Illinois, and the Head of the
Passes, in so far as these tributaries and outlets
are affected by the flood waters of the Mis-
sissippi River.
(Sept. 22, 1922, ch. 427, § 13, 42 Stat. 1047.)
Editorial Notes
CODIFICATION
Section is from the Rivers and Harbors Appropriation
Act for the year 1922.
§ 652. Upper Mississippi River Management
(a) Short title; Congressional declaration of in-
tent
(1) This section may be cited as the ‘‘Upper
Mississippi River Management Act of 1986’’.
(2) To ensure the coordinated development and
enhancement of the Upper Mississippi River sys-
tem, it is hereby declared to be the intent of
Congress to recognize that system as a nation-
ally significant ecosystem and a nationally sig-
nificant commercial navigation system. Con-
gress further recognizes that the system pro-
vides a diversity of opportunities and experi-
ences. The system shall be adminis
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 33 U.S.C. § 652
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.