28 U.S.C. § 1355 — Fine, penalty or forfeiture

Page 378 TITLE 28—JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE § 1351 ‘‘(C) the threat of imminent death; or ‘‘(D) the threat that another individual will im- minently be subjected to death, severe physical pain or suffering, or the administration or applica- tion of mind altering substances or other proce- dures calculated to disrupt profoundly the senses or personality.’’ § 1351. Consuls, vice consuls, and members of a diplomatic mission as defendant The district courts shall have original juris- diction, exclusive of the courts of the States, of all civil actions and proceedings against— (1) consuls or vice consuls of foreign states; or (2) members of a mission or members of their families (as such terms are defined in section 2 of the Diplomatic Relations Act). (June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 934; May 24, 1949, ch. 139, § 80(c), 63 Stat. 101; Pub. L. 95–393, § 8(a)(1), Sept. 30, 1978, 92 Stat. 810.) HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§ 41(18), 371(8) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §§ 24, par. 18, 256, par. 8, 36 Stat. 1093, 1160). Words ‘‘civil action’’ were substituted for ‘‘suits,’’ and ‘‘all suits and proceedings’’ in view of Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Changes were made in phraseology. Editorial Notes REFERENCES IN TEXT Section 2 of the Diplomatic Relations Act, referred to in par. (2), is classified to section 254a of Title 22, For- eign Relations and Intercourse. AMENDMENTS 1978—Pub. L. 95–393 substituted ‘‘Consuls, vice con- suls, and members of a diplomatic mission as defend- ant’’ for ‘‘Consuls and vice consuls as defendants’’ in section catchline, designated existing provisions as in- troductory provision preceding par. (1), and in such in- troductory provision as so designated, substituted ‘‘civil actions and proceedings against—’’ for ‘‘actions and proceedings against consuls or vice consuls of for- eign states’’, and added pars. (1) and (2). 1949—Act May 24, 1949, substituted ‘‘of all actions and proceedings’’ for ‘‘of any civil action’’. Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1978 AMENDMENT Amendment by Pub. L. 95–393 effective at end of nine- ty-day period beginning on Sept. 30, 1978, see section 9 of Pub. L. 95–393, set out as an Effective Date note under section 254a of Title 22, Foreign Relations and Intercourse. § 1352. Bonds executed under federal law The district courts shall have original juris- diction, concurrent with State courts, of any ac- tion on a bond executed under any law of the United States, except matters within the juris- diction of the Court of International Trade under section 1582 of this title. (June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 934; Pub. L. 96–417, title V, § 506, Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1743.) HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES This section is necessary to permit actions in the dis- trict courts upon any bond authorized by a law of the United States. In the absence of this new provision, such actions could not be maintained except by the United States, where the amount and other jurisdic- tional requisites did not exist. The new section also makes clear that it does not affect the right to pros- ecute such actions in State courts. Editorial Notes AMENDMENTS 1980—Pub. L. 96–417 inserted exception for matters within the jurisdiction of the Court of International Trade under section 1582 of this title. Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1980 AMENDMENT Amendment by Pub. L. 96–417 applicable with respect to civil actions commenced on or after the 90th day after Nov. 1, 1980, see section 701(c)(1)(B) of Pub. L. 96–417, set out as a note under section 251 of this title. § 1353. Indian allotments The district courts shall have original juris- diction of any civil action involving the right of any person, in whole or in part of Indian blood or descent, to any allotment of land under any Act of Congress or treaty. The judgment in favor of any claimant to an allotment of land shall have the same effect, when properly certified to the Secretary of the Interior, as if such allotment had been allowed and approved by him; but this provision shall not apply to any lands held on or before Decem- ber 21, 1911, by either of the Five Civilized Tribes, the Osage Nation of Indians, nor to any of the lands within the Quapaw Indian Agency. (June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 934.) HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., § 41(24) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, § 24, par. 24, 36 Stat. 1094; Dec. 21, 1911, ch. 5, 37 Stat. 46). Words ‘‘any civil action’’ were substituted for ‘‘all ac- tions, suits, or proceedings,’’ in view of Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The sentence ‘‘The right of appeal shall be allowed to either party as in other cases’’ was omitted as covered by section 1291 of this title, relating to appeals to the court of appeals. Changes in phraseology were made. § 1354. Land grants from different states The district courts shall have original juris- diction of actions between citizens of the same state claiming lands under grants from different states. (June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 934.) HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., § 41(1) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, § 24, par. 1, 36 Stat. 1091; May 14, 1934, ch. 283, § 1, 48 Stat. 775; Aug. 21, 1937, ch. 726, § 1, 50 Stat. 738; Apr. 20, 1940, ch. 117, 54 Stat. 143). Other provisions of section 41(1) of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., are incorporated in sections 1331, 1332, 1341, 1342, 1345, and 1359 of this title. Changes were made in phraseology. § 1355. Fine, penalty or forfeiture (a) The district courts shall have original ju- risdiction, exclusive of the courts of the States, of any action or proceeding for the recovery or Page 379 TITLE 28—JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE § 1358 1 So in original. Probably should be capitalized. enforcement of any fine, penalty, or forfeiture, pecuniary or otherwise, incurred under any Act of Congress, except matters within the jurisdic- tion of the Court of International Trade under section 1582 of this title. (b)(1) A forfeiture action or proceeding may be brought in— (A) the district court for the district in which any of the acts or omissions giving rise to the forfeiture occurred, or (B) any other district where venue for the forfeiture action or proceeding is specifically provided for in section 1395 of this title or any other statute. (2) Whenever property subject to forfeiture under the laws of the United States is located in a foreign country, or has been detained or seized pursuant to legal process or competent author- ity of a foreign government, an action or pro- ceeding for forfeiture may be brought as pro- vided in paragraph (1), or in the United States District court 1 for the District of Columbia. (c) In any case in which a final order disposing of property in a civil forfeiture action or pro- ceeding is appealed, removal of the property by the prevailing party shall not deprive the court of jurisdiction. Upon motion of the appealing party, the district court or the court of appeals shall issue any order necessary to preserve the right of the appealing party to the full value of the property at issue, including a stay of the judgment of the district court pending appeal or requiring the prevailing party to post an appeal bond. (d) Any court with jurisdiction over a for- feiture action pursuant to subsection (b) may issue and cause to be served in any other district such process as may be required to bring before the court the property that is the subject of the forfeiture action. (June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 934; Pub. L. 96–417, title V, § 507, Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1743; Pub. L. 102–550, title XV, § 1521, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4062.) HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§ 41(9) and 371(2) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §§ 24, par. 9, 256, par. 2, 36 Stat. 1092, 1160). Word ‘‘fine’’ was inserted so that this section will apply to the many provisions in the United States Code for fines which are essentially civil. (See, also, section 2461 of this title and reviser’s note thereunder.) Words ‘‘pecuniary or otherwise’’ were added to make this section expressly applicable to both pecuniary and property forfeitures. The original section was so con- strued in Miller v. United States, 1870, 11 Wall. 268, 20 L.Ed. 135; Tyler v. Defrees, 1870, 11 Wall. 331, and The Rosemary, C.C.A. 1928, 26 F.2d 354, certiorari denied 49 S.Ct. 23, 278 U.S. 619, 73 L.Ed. 542. Changes were made in phraseology. Editorial Notes AMENDMENTS 1992—Pub. L. 102–550 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a) and added subsecs. (b) to (d). 1980—Pub. L. 96–417 inserted exception for matters within the jurisdiction of the Court of International Trade under section 1582 of this title. Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1980 AMENDMENT Amendment by Pub. L. 96–417 applicable with respect to civil actions commenced on or after the 90th day after Nov. 1, 1980, see section 701(c)(1)(B) of Pub. L. 96–417, set out as a note under section 251 of this title. § 1356. Seizures not within admiralty and mari- time jurisdiction The district courts shall have original juris- diction, exclusive of the courts of the States, of any seizure under any law of the United States on land or upon waters not within admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, except matters within the jurisdiction of the Court of International Trade under section 1582 of this title. (June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 934; Pub. L. 96–417, title V, § 508, Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1743.) HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§ 41(3) and 371(4) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §§ 24, par. 3, 256, par. 4, 36 Stat. 1091, 1160; Oct. 6, 1917, ch. 97, § 1, 40 Stat. 395; June 10, 1922, ch. 216, § 1, 42 Stat. 634). Section consolidates certain provisions of sections 41(3) and 371(4) of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed. Other provi- sions of such sections are incorporated in section 1333 of this title. Changes were made in arrangement and phraseology. Editorial Notes AMENDMENTS 1980—Pub. L. 96–417 inserted exception for matters within the jurisdiction of the Court of International Trade under section 1582 of this title. Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1980 AMENDMENT Amendment by Pub. L. 96–417 applicable with respect to civil actions commenced on or after the 90th day after Nov. 1, 1980, see section 701(c)(1)(B) of Pub. L. 96–417, set out as a note under section 251 of this title. § 1357. Injuries under Federal laws The district courts shall have original juris- diction of any civil action commenced by any person to recover damages for any injury to his person or property on account of any act done by him, under any Act of Congress, for the pro- tection or collection of any of the revenues, or to enforce the right of citizens of the United States to vote in any State. (June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 934.) HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., § 41(11) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, § 24, par. 11, 36 Stat. 1092.) Words ‘‘any civil action’’ were substituted for ‘‘all suits,’’ in view of Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Minor changes were made in phraseology. § 1358. Eminent domain The district courts shall have original juris- diction of all proceedings to condemn real estate for the use of the United States or its depart- ments or agencies. (June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 935.)