Arkansas Legal Resource Navigator

10 U.S.C. § 3101 — Definitions

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

10 U.S.C. § 3101 — Definitions

Page 2395 TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES § 3103 to be deployed urgently, within 2 years, within 5 years, and longer than 5 years. ‘‘(b) BUDGETING AND ACQUISITION SYSTEMS.—The Sec- retary of Defense shall review and ensure that the ac- quisition and budgeting systems are structured to meet time-based or phased requirements in a manner that is predictable, cost effective, and efficient and takes ad- vantage of emerging technological developments.’’ § 3101. Definitions In this chapter, the term ‘‘acquisition’’ has the meaning provided in section 131 of title 41. (Added Pub. L. 111–383, div. A, title VIII, § 861(a), Jan. 7, 2011, 124 Stat. 4288, § 2545; amended Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title X, § 1071(a)(11), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3505; renumbered § 3101 and amend- ed Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, § 1808(a)(2), (b)(1), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4159, 4160.) Editorial Notes CODIFICATION Section 2545 of this title, which was transferred to this section by Pub. L. 116–283, § 1808(a)(2), was also transferred or copied in large part to section 3001 of this title by Pub. L. 116–283, § 1806(a)(2)–(4). AMENDMENTS 2021—Pub. L. 116–283, § 1808(b)(1), substituted ‘‘In this chapter, the term’’ for ‘‘In this chapter:’’, par. (1) des- ignation, and ‘‘The term’’ and struck out pars. (2) to (4) which defined ‘‘defense acquisition system’’, ‘‘element of the defense acquisition system’’, and ‘‘acquisition workforce’’. Pub. L. 116–283, § 1808(a)(2), renumbered section 2545 of this title as this section. 2014—Par. (1). Pub. L. 113–291 substituted ‘‘section 131 of title 41’’ for ‘‘section 4(16) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(16))’’. Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2021 AMENDMENT Amendment by Pub. L. 116–283

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 10 U.S.C. § 3101

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.

Original supplied file — preserved unchanged

Download original Markdown file

File SHA-256: 4090b9a655b74e1e529f0163ef6c43a447c6fe075401b06cf0ccd0506aadd893. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.

Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.

Open the recorded source website ↗

Record provenance

Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-f3ab6ad2b63756049a404b64
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-10/section-3101-definitions--94967f8818.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 1973c80b15641b9305d28e12f3fc25dbc43919370338c74e93a23862e9f4b34a

Source location: USCODE-2024-title10-subtitleA-partV-subpartA-chap205-sec3101.pdf

Stored source content

Page 2395 TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES § 3103 to be deployed urgently, within 2 years, within 5 years, and longer than 5 years. ‘‘(b) BUDGETING AND ACQUISITION SYSTEMS.—The Sec- retary of Defense shall review and ensure that the ac- quisition and budgeting systems are structured to meet time-based or phased requirements in a manner that is predictable, cost effective, and efficient and takes ad- vantage of emerging technological developments.’’ § 3101. Definitions In this chapter, the term ‘‘acquisition’’ has the meaning provided in section 131 of title 41. (Added Pub. L. 111–383, div. A, title VIII, § 861(a), Jan. 7, 2011, 124 Stat. 4288, § 2545; amended Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title X, § 1071(a)(11), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3505; renumbered § 3101 and amend- ed Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, § 1808(a)(2), (b)(1), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4159, 4160.) Editorial Notes CODIFICATION Section 2545 of this title, which was transferred to this section by Pub. L. 116–283, § 1808(a)(2), was also transferred or copied in large part to section 3001 of this title by Pub. L. 116–283, § 1806(a)(2)–(4). AMENDMENTS 2021—Pub. L. 116–283, § 1808(b)(1), substituted ‘‘In this chapter, the term’’ for ‘‘In this chapter:’’, par. (1) des- ignation, and ‘‘The term’’ and struck out pars. (2) to (4) which defined ‘‘defense acquisition system’’, ‘‘element of the defense acquisition system’’, and ‘‘acquisition workforce’’. Pub. L. 116–283, § 1808(a)(2), renumbered section 2545 of this title as this section. 2014—Par. (1). Pub. L. 113–291 substituted ‘‘section 131 of title 41’’ for ‘‘section 4(16) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(16))’’. Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2021 AMENDMENT Amendment by Pub. L. 116–283 effective Jan. 1, 2022, with additional provisions for delayed implementation and applicability of existing law, see section 1801(d) of Pub. L. 116–283, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title. § 3102. Customer-oriented acquisition system (a) OBJECTIVE.—It shall be the objective of the defense acquisition system to meet the needs of its customers in the most cost-effective manner practicable. The acquisition policies, directives, and regulations of the Department of Defense shall be modified as necessary to ensure the de- velopment and implementation of a customer- oriented acquisition system. (b) CUSTOMER.—The customer of the defense acquisition system is the armed force that will have primary responsibility for fielding the sys- tem or systems acquired. The customer is rep- resented with regard to a major defense acquisi- tion program by the Secretary of the military department concerned and the Chief of the armed force concerned. (c) ROLE OF CUSTOMER.—The customer of a major defense acquisition program shall be re- sponsible for balancing resources against prior- ities on the acquisition program and ensuring that appropriate trade-offs are made among cost, schedule, technical feasibility, and per- formance on a continuing basis throughout the life of the acquisition program. (Added Pub. L. 114–92, div. A, title VIII, § 802(a)(1), Nov. 25, 2015, 129 Stat. 878, § 2546a; re- numbered § 3102 and amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, § 1808(a)(2), (3)(A), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4159.) Editorial Notes AMENDMENTS 2021—Pub. L. 116–283 renumbered section 2546a of this title as this section and transferred it so as to appear after section 3101 of this title. Directory language transferring this section ‘‘within such section’’ was ex- ecuted as if it had read ‘‘within such chapter’’, meaning chapter 205 of this title, to reflect the probable intent of Congress. Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2021 AMENDMENT Amendment by Pub. L. 116–283 effective Jan. 1, 2022, with additional provisions for delayed implementation and applicability of existing law, see section 1801(d) of Pub. L. 116–283, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title. CONSIDERATION OF TRADE-OFFS AMONG COST, SCHED- ULE, AND PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES IN DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ACQUISITION PROGRAMS Pub. L. 111–23, title II, § 201(a), May 22, 2009, 123 Stat. 1719, provided that: ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall en- sure that mechanisms are developed and implemented to require consideration of trade-offs among cost, schedule, and performance objectives as part of the process for developing requirements for Department of Defense acquisition programs. ‘‘(2) ELEMENTS.—The mechanisms required under this subsection shall ensure, at a minimum, that— ‘‘(A) Department of Defense officials responsible for acquisition, budget, and cost estimating functions are provided an appropriate opportunity to develop estimates and raise cost and schedule matters before performance objectives are established for capabili- ties for which the Chairman of the Joint Require- ments Oversight Council is the validation authority; and ‘‘(B) the process for developing requirements is structured to enable incremental, evolutionary, or spiral acquisition approaches, including the deferral of technologies that are not yet mature and capabili- ties that are likely to significantly increase costs or delay production until later increments or spirals.’’ § 3103. Civilian management of the defense ac- quisition system (a) RESPONSIBILITY OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR ACQUISITION AND SUSTAINMENT.—Subject to the authority, direc- tion and control of the Secretary of Defense, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment shall be responsible for the man- agement of the defense acquisition system and shall exercise such control of the system and perform such duties as are necessary to ensure the successful and efficient operation of the de- fense acquisition system, including the duties enumerated and assigned to the Under Secretary elsewhere in this title. (b) RESPONSIBILITY OF THE SERVICE ACQUISI- TION EXECUTIVES.—Subject to the direction of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment on matters pertaining to ac- quisition, and subject to the authority, direc- tion, and control of the Secretary of the mili-

Cross-references

Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

10 U.S.C. § 3101 — Definitions

In this chapter: (1) The term “best value” means, with respect to an acquisition, the optimal combination of cost, quality, technical capability or solution quality, and delivery schedule. (2) The term “capability requirement” means a capability that is critical or essential to address an operational problem. (3) The term “cost-effective” means, with respect to an acquisition, delivering superior end-user results at equal or lower cost compared to alternatives. (4) The term “operational problem” means— (A) a challenge of a military department in achieving an assigned military objective based on current doctrine, emerging threats, or future concepts; and (B) may include limitations in capabilities, capacity, resources, or the ability to effectively and efficiently coordinate across the joint force, with another combatant command, or among military capabilities. (5) The term “service chief” means— (A) the Chief of Staff of the Army, with respect to matters concerning the Army; (B) the Chief of Naval Operations, with respect to matters concerning the Navy; (C) the Commandant of the Marine Corps, with respect to matters concerning the Marine Corps; (D) the Chief of Staff of the Air Force, with respect to matters concerning the Air Force; and (E) the Chief of Space Operations, with respect to matters concerning the Space Force.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 3101

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.