Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
10 U.S.C. § 3101 — Definitions
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 2395
TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES
§ 3103
to be deployed urgently, within 2 years, within 5 years,
and longer than 5 years.
‘‘(b) BUDGETING AND ACQUISITION SYSTEMS.—The Sec-
retary of Defense shall review and ensure that the ac-
quisition and budgeting systems are structured to meet
time-based or phased requirements in a manner that is
predictable, cost effective, and efficient and takes ad-
vantage of emerging technological developments.’’
§ 3101. Definitions
In this chapter, the term ‘‘acquisition’’ has
the meaning provided in section 131 of title 41.
(Added Pub. L. 111–383, div. A, title VIII, § 861(a),
Jan. 7, 2011, 124 Stat. 4288, § 2545; amended Pub.
L. 113–291, div. A, title X, § 1071(a)(11), Dec. 19,
2014, 128 Stat. 3505; renumbered § 3101 and amend-
ed Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, § 1808(a)(2),
(b)(1), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4159, 4160.)
Editorial Notes
CODIFICATION
Section 2545 of this title, which was transferred to
this section by Pub. L. 116–283, § 1808(a)(2), was also
transferred or copied in large part to section 3001 of
this title by Pub. L. 116–283, § 1806(a)(2)–(4).
AMENDMENTS
2021—Pub. L. 116–283, § 1808(b)(1), substituted ‘‘In this
chapter, the term’’ for ‘‘In this chapter:’’, par. (1) des-
ignation, and ‘‘The term’’ and struck out pars. (2) to (4)
which defined ‘‘defense acquisition system’’, ‘‘element
of the defense acquisition system’’, and ‘‘acquisition
workforce’’.
Pub. L. 116–283, § 1808(a)(2), renumbered section 2545 of
this title as this section.
2014—Par. (1). Pub. L. 113–291 substituted ‘‘section 131
of title 41’’ for ‘‘section 4(16) of the Office of Federal
Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(16))’’.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2021 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 116–283
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 10 U.S.C. § 3101
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: 4090b9a655b74e1e529f0163ef6c43a447c6fe075401b06cf0ccd0506aadd893. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-f3ab6ad2b63756049a404b64
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-10/section-3101-definitions--94967f8818.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 1973c80b15641b9305d28e12f3fc25dbc43919370338c74e93a23862e9f4b34a
Source location: USCODE-2024-title10-subtitleA-partV-subpartA-chap205-sec3101.pdf
Stored source content
Page 2395
TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES
§ 3103
to be deployed urgently, within 2 years, within 5 years,
and longer than 5 years.
‘‘(b) BUDGETING AND ACQUISITION SYSTEMS.—The Sec-
retary of Defense shall review and ensure that the ac-
quisition and budgeting systems are structured to meet
time-based or phased requirements in a manner that is
predictable, cost effective, and efficient and takes ad-
vantage of emerging technological developments.’’
§ 3101. Definitions
In this chapter, the term ‘‘acquisition’’ has
the meaning provided in section 131 of title 41.
(Added Pub. L. 111–383, div. A, title VIII, § 861(a),
Jan. 7, 2011, 124 Stat. 4288, § 2545; amended Pub.
L. 113–291, div. A, title X, § 1071(a)(11), Dec. 19,
2014, 128 Stat. 3505; renumbered § 3101 and amend-
ed Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, § 1808(a)(2),
(b)(1), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4159, 4160.)
Editorial Notes
CODIFICATION
Section 2545 of this title, which was transferred to
this section by Pub. L. 116–283, § 1808(a)(2), was also
transferred or copied in large part to section 3001 of
this title by Pub. L. 116–283, § 1806(a)(2)–(4).
AMENDMENTS
2021—Pub. L. 116–283, § 1808(b)(1), substituted ‘‘In this
chapter, the term’’ for ‘‘In this chapter:’’, par. (1) des-
ignation, and ‘‘The term’’ and struck out pars. (2) to (4)
which defined ‘‘defense acquisition system’’, ‘‘element
of the defense acquisition system’’, and ‘‘acquisition
workforce’’.
Pub. L. 116–283, § 1808(a)(2), renumbered section 2545 of
this title as this section.
2014—Par. (1). Pub. L. 113–291 substituted ‘‘section 131
of title 41’’ for ‘‘section 4(16) of the Office of Federal
Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(16))’’.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2021 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 116–283 effective Jan. 1, 2022,
with additional provisions for delayed implementation
and applicability of existing law, see section 1801(d) of
Pub. L. 116–283, set out as a note preceding section 3001
of this title.
§ 3102. Customer-oriented acquisition system
(a) OBJECTIVE.—It shall be the objective of the
defense acquisition system to meet the needs of
its customers in the most cost-effective manner
practicable. The acquisition policies, directives,
and regulations of the Department of Defense
shall be modified as necessary to ensure the de-
velopment and implementation of a customer-
oriented acquisition system.
(b) CUSTOMER.—The customer of the defense
acquisition system is the armed force that will
have primary responsibility for fielding the sys-
tem or systems acquired. The customer is rep-
resented with regard to a major defense acquisi-
tion program by the Secretary of the military
department concerned and the Chief of the
armed force concerned.
(c) ROLE
OF CUSTOMER.—The customer of a
major defense acquisition program shall be re-
sponsible for balancing resources against prior-
ities on the acquisition program and ensuring
that appropriate trade-offs are made among
cost, schedule, technical feasibility, and per-
formance on a continuing basis throughout the
life of the acquisition program.
(Added Pub. L. 114–92, div. A, title VIII,
§ 802(a)(1), Nov. 25, 2015, 129 Stat. 878, § 2546a; re-
numbered § 3102 and amended Pub. L. 116–283,
div. A, title XVIII, § 1808(a)(2), (3)(A), Jan. 1, 2021,
134 Stat. 4159.)
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
2021—Pub. L. 116–283 renumbered section 2546a of this
title as this section and transferred it so as to appear
after section 3101 of this title. Directory language
transferring this section ‘‘within such section’’ was ex-
ecuted as if it had read ‘‘within such chapter’’, meaning
chapter 205 of this title, to reflect the probable intent
of Congress.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2021 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 116–283 effective Jan. 1, 2022,
with additional provisions for delayed implementation
and applicability of existing law, see section 1801(d) of
Pub. L. 116–283, set out as a note preceding section 3001
of this title.
CONSIDERATION
OF TRADE-OFFS AMONG COST, SCHED-
ULE, AND PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES IN DEPARTMENT
OF DEFENSE ACQUISITION PROGRAMS
Pub. L. 111–23, title II, § 201(a), May 22, 2009, 123 Stat.
1719, provided that:
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall en-
sure that mechanisms are developed and implemented
to require consideration of trade-offs among cost,
schedule, and performance objectives as part of the
process for developing requirements for Department of
Defense acquisition programs.
‘‘(2) ELEMENTS.—The mechanisms required under this
subsection shall ensure, at a minimum, that—
‘‘(A) Department of Defense officials responsible for
acquisition, budget, and cost estimating functions
are provided an appropriate opportunity to develop
estimates and raise cost and schedule matters before
performance objectives are established for capabili-
ties for which the Chairman of the Joint Require-
ments Oversight Council is the validation authority;
and
‘‘(B) the process for developing requirements is
structured to enable incremental, evolutionary, or
spiral acquisition approaches, including the deferral
of technologies that are not yet mature and capabili-
ties that are likely to significantly increase costs or
delay production until later increments or spirals.’’
§ 3103. Civilian management of the defense ac-
quisition system
(a) RESPONSIBILITY OF THE UNDER SECRETARY
OF
DEFENSE
FOR
ACQUISITION
AND
SUSTAINMENT.—Subject to the authority, direc-
tion and control of the Secretary of Defense, the
Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and
Sustainment shall be responsible for the man-
agement of the defense acquisition system and
shall exercise such control of the system and
perform such duties as are necessary to ensure
the successful and efficient operation of the de-
fense acquisition system, including the duties
enumerated and assigned to the Under Secretary
elsewhere in this title.
(b) RESPONSIBILITY
OF
THE SERVICE ACQUISI-
TION EXECUTIVES.—Subject to the direction of
the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition
and Sustainment on matters pertaining to ac-
quisition, and subject to the authority, direc-
tion, and control of the Secretary of the mili-
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
In this chapter:
(1) The term “best value” means, with respect to an acquisition, the optimal combination of cost, quality, technical capability or solution quality, and delivery schedule.
(2) The term “capability requirement” means a capability that is critical or essential to address an operational problem.
(3) The term “cost-effective” means, with respect to an acquisition, delivering superior end-user results at equal or lower cost compared to alternatives.
(4) The term “operational problem” means—
(A) a challenge of a military department in achieving an assigned military objective based on current doctrine, emerging threats, or future concepts; and
(B) may include limitations in capabilities, capacity, resources, or the ability to effectively and efficiently coordinate across the joint force, with another combatant command, or among military capabilities.
(5) The term “service chief” means—
(A) the Chief of Staff of the Army, with respect to matters concerning the Army;
(B) the Chief of Naval Operations, with respect to matters concerning the Navy;
(C) the Commandant of the Marine Corps, with respect to matters concerning the Marine Corps;
(D) the Chief of Staff of the Air Force, with respect to matters concerning the Air Force; and
(E) the Chief of Space Operations, with respect to matters concerning the Space Force.
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 3101
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.