Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
28 U.S.C. § 124 — Texas
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 52
TITLE 28—JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE
§ 124
‘‘(2) PENDING CASES NOT AFFECTED.—The amendments
made by this section shall not affect any action com-
menced before the effective date of this section and
pending in the United States District Court for the
Western District of Tennessee on such date.
‘‘(3) JURIES
NOT
AFFECTED.—The amendments made
by this section shall not affect the composition, or pre-
clude the service, of any grand or petit jury summoned,
impaneled, or actually serving in the United States
District Court for the Western District of Tennessee on
the effective date of this section.’’
§ 124. Texas
Texas is divided into four judicial districts to
be known as the Northern, Southern, Eastern,
and Western Districts of Texas.
Northern District
(a) The Northern District comprises seven di-
visions.
(1) The Dallas Division comprises the coun-
ties of Dallas, Ellis, Hunt, Johnson,
Kaufman, Navarro, and Rockwall.
Court for the Dallas Division shall be held at
Dallas.
(2) The Fort Worth Division comprises the
counties of Comanche, Erath, Hood,
Jack, Palo Pinto, Parker, Tarrant, and
Wise.
Court for the Fort Worth Division shall be
held at Fort Worth.
(3) The Abilene Division comprises the coun-
ties of Callahan, Eastland, Fisher, Has-
kell, Howard, Jones, Mitchell, Nolan,
Shackleford, Stephens, Stonewall, Tay-
lor, and Throckmorton.
Court for the Abilene Division shall be held
at Abilene.
(4) The San Angelo Division comprises the
counties
of
Brown,
Coke,
Coleman,
Concho, Crockett, Glasscock, Irion, Men-
ard, Mills, Reagan, Runnels, Schleicher,
Sterling, Sutton, and Tom Green.
Court for the San Angelo Division shall be
held at San Angelo.
(5) The Amarillo Division comprises the
counties of Armstrong, Brisco, Carson,
Cas
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 28 U.S.C. § 124
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: dfc46acaa9fe484a369dce5246acef848c28c98ab9aed3abad70a45768a77283. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-efb9ae391e0ec7503d72dc77
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-28/section-124-texas--7e70113faa.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 669a702f300f84a3cbf6c17e0f09dbd666d97fbe07ea97ca11f0d48033f7ec3e
Source location: USCODE-2024-title28-partI-chap5-sec124.pdf
Stored source content
Page 52
TITLE 28—JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE
§ 124
‘‘(2) PENDING CASES NOT AFFECTED.—The amendments
made by this section shall not affect any action com-
menced before the effective date of this section and
pending in the United States District Court for the
Western District of Tennessee on such date.
‘‘(3) JURIES
NOT
AFFECTED.—The amendments made
by this section shall not affect the composition, or pre-
clude the service, of any grand or petit jury summoned,
impaneled, or actually serving in the United States
District Court for the Western District of Tennessee on
the effective date of this section.’’
§ 124. Texas
Texas is divided into four judicial districts to
be known as the Northern, Southern, Eastern,
and Western Districts of Texas.
Northern District
(a) The Northern District comprises seven di-
visions.
(1) The Dallas Division comprises the coun-
ties of Dallas, Ellis, Hunt, Johnson,
Kaufman, Navarro, and Rockwall.
Court for the Dallas Division shall be held at
Dallas.
(2) The Fort Worth Division comprises the
counties of Comanche, Erath, Hood,
Jack, Palo Pinto, Parker, Tarrant, and
Wise.
Court for the Fort Worth Division shall be
held at Fort Worth.
(3) The Abilene Division comprises the coun-
ties of Callahan, Eastland, Fisher, Has-
kell, Howard, Jones, Mitchell, Nolan,
Shackleford, Stephens, Stonewall, Tay-
lor, and Throckmorton.
Court for the Abilene Division shall be held
at Abilene.
(4) The San Angelo Division comprises the
counties
of
Brown,
Coke,
Coleman,
Concho, Crockett, Glasscock, Irion, Men-
ard, Mills, Reagan, Runnels, Schleicher,
Sterling, Sutton, and Tom Green.
Court for the San Angelo Division shall be
held at San Angelo.
(5) The Amarillo Division comprises the
counties of Armstrong, Brisco, Carson,
Castro,
Childress,
Collingsworth,
Dallam, Deaf Smith, Donley, Gray, Hall,
Hansford,
Hartley,
Hemphill,
Hutch-
inson,
Lipscomb,
Moore,
Ochiltree,
Oldham, Parmer, Potter, Randall, Rob-
erts, Sherman, Swisher, and Wheeler.
Court for the Amarillo Division shall be held
at Amarillo.
(6) The Wichita Falls Division comprises the
counties of Archer, Baylor, Clay, Cottle,
Foard, Hardeman, King, Knox, Mon-
tague, Wichita, Wilbarger, and Young.
Court for the Wichita Falls Division shall be
held at Wichita Falls.
(7) The Lubbock Division comprises the
counties of Bailey, Borden, Cochran,
Crosby, Dawson, Dickens, Floyd, Gaines,
Garza, Hale, Hockley, Kent, Lamb, Lub-
bock, Lynn, Motley, Scurry, Terry, and
Yoakum.
Court for the Lubbock Division shall be held
at Lubbock.
Southern District
(b) The Southern District comprises seven di-
visions.
(1) The Galveston Division comprises the
counties of Brazoria, Chambers, Gal-
veston, and Matagorda.
Court for the Galveston Division shall be
held at Galveston.
(2) The Houston Division comprises the
counties of Austin, Brazos, Colorado,
Fayette, Fort Bend, Grimes, Harris,
Madison,
Montgomery,
San
Jacinto,
Walker, Waller, and Wharton.
Court for the Houston Division shall be held
at Houston.
(3) The Laredo Division comprises the coun-
ties of Jim Hogg, La Salle, McMullen,
Webb, and Zapata.
Court for the Laredo Division shall be held
at Laredo.
(4) The Brownsville Division comprises the
counties of Cameron and Willacy.
Court for the Brownsville Division shall be
held at Brownsville.
(5) The Victoria Division comprises the
counties of Calhoun, DeWitt, Goliad,
Jackson, Lavaca, Refugio, and Victoria.
Court for the Victoria Division shall be held
at Victoria.
(6) The Corpus Christi Division comprises
the counties of Aransas, Bee, Brooks,
Duval, Jim Wells, Kenedy, Kleberg, Live
Oak, Nueces, and San Patricio.
Court for the Corpus Christi Division shall
be held at Corpus Christi.
(7) The McAllen Division comprises the
counties of Hidalgo and Starr.
Court for the McAllen Division shall be held
at McAllen.
Eastern District
(c) The Eastern District comprises seven divi-
sions.
(1) The Tyler Division comprises the coun-
ties of Anderson, Cherokee, Gregg, Hen-
derson, Panola, Rains, Rusk, Smith, Van
Zandt, and Wood.
Court for Tyler Division will be held at
Tyler.
(2) The Beaumont Division comprises the
counties of Hardin, Jasper, Jefferson,
Liberty, Newton, and Orange.
Court for the Beaumont Division is to be
held at Beaumont.
(3) The Sherman Division comprises the
counties of Collin, Cook, Delta, Denton,
Fannin, Grayson, Hopkins, and Lamar.
Court for the Sherman Division shall be held
at Sherman and Plano.
(4) The Marshall Division comprises the
counties of Camp, Cass, Harrison, Mar-
ion, Morris, and Upshur.
Court for the Marshall Division shall be held
at Marshall.
(5) The Texarkana Division comprises the
counties of Bowie, Franklin, Red River,
and Titus.
Court for the Texarkana Division shall be
held at Texarkana, and may be held any-
where within the Federal courthouse in
Texarkana that is located astride the
State line between Texas and Arkansas.
(6) The Lufkin Division comprises the coun-
ties of Angelina, Houston, Nacogdoches,
Page 53
TITLE 28—JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE
§ 124
Polk, Sabine, San Augustine, Shelby,
Trinity, and Tyler.
Court for the Lufkin Division shall be held
at Lufkin.
Western District
(d) The Western District comprises seven divi-
sions.
(1) The Austin Division comprises the coun-
ties
of
Bastrop,
Blanco,
Burleson,
Burnet,
Caldwell,
Gillespie,
Hays,
Kimble, Lampasas, Lee, Llano, Mason,
McCulloch, San Saba, Travis, Wash-
ington, and Williamson.
Court for the Austin Division shall be held
at Austin.
(2) The Waco Division comprises the coun-
ties of Bell, Bosque, Coryell, Falls, Free-
stone, Hamilton, Hill, Leon, Limestone,
McLennan,
Milam,
Robertson,
and
Somervell.
Court for the Waco Division shall be held at
Waco.
(3) The El Paso Division comprises the coun-
ty of El Paso.
Court for the El Paso Division shall be held
at El Paso.
(4) The San Antonio Division comprises the
counties of Atascosa, Bandera, Bexar,
Comal, Dimmit, Frio, Gonzales, Guada-
lupe, Karnes, Kendall, Kerr, Medina,
Real, and Wilson.
Court for the San Antonio Division shall be
held at San Antonio.
(5) The Del Rio Division comprises the coun-
ties
of
Edwards,
Kinney,
Maverick,
Terrell, Uvalde, Val Verde, and Zavalla.
Court for the Del Rio Division shall be held
at Del Rio.
(6) The Pecos Division comprises the coun-
ties of Brewster, Culberson, Jeff Davis,
Hudspeth,
Loving,
Pecos,
Presidio,
Reeves, Ward, and Winkler.
Court for the Pecos Division shall be held at
Pecos and Alpine.
(7) The Midland-Odessa Division comprises
the counties of Andrews, Crane, Ector,
Martin, Midland, and Upton.
Court for the Midland-Odessa Division shall
be held at Midland. Court may be held,
in the discretion of the court, in Odessa,
when courtroom facilities are made
available at no expense to the Govern-
ment.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 891; Feb. 10, 1954,
ch. 6, § 2(b)(9)(a), (b), 68 Stat. 11; Pub. L. 85–298,
§§ 1, 2, Sept. 4, 1957, 71 Stat. 618; Pub. L. 87–352,
Oct. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. 772; Pub. L. 88–282, Mar. 11,
1964, 78 Stat. 163; Pub. L. 88–512, Aug. 30, 1964, 78
Stat. 695; Pub. L. 90–216, Dec. 18, 1967, 81 Stat.
661; Pub. L. 96–462, § 6, Oct. 15, 1980, 94 Stat. 2054;
Pub. L. 98–620, title IV, § 407(a), Nov. 8, 1984, 98
Stat. 3362; Pub. L. 108–157, § 1(a), Dec. 3, 2003, 117
Stat. 1947; Pub. L. 108–455, § 3, Dec. 10, 2004, 118
Stat. 3628; Pub. L. 118–73, § 2(a), July 30, 2024, 138
Stat. 1504.)
HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., § 189 (Mar. 3, 1911,
ch. 231, § 108, 36 Stat. 1125; May 29, 1912, ch. 144, 37 Stat.
120; Feb. 5, 1913, ch. 28, §§ 1, 2, 37 Stat. 663; Feb. 26, 1917,
ch. 122, 39 Stat. 939; Mar. 1, 1919, ch. 87, 40 Stat. 1270;
Mar. 2, 1923, ch. 172, §§ 1, 2, 42 Stat. 1373; Apr. 3, 1924, ch.
82, 43 Stat. 64; May 29, 1924, ch. 211, §§ 1, 2, 43 Stat. 244;
May 26, 1928, ch. 752, § 1, 45 Stat. 747; June 6, 1930, ch.
408, 46 Stat. 521; June 24, 1930, ch. 596, 46 Stat. 807; Feb.
20, 1932, ch. 51, 47 Stat. 52; July 25, 1939, ch. 356, § 1, 53
Stat. 1082; June 6, 1940, ch. 252, 54 Stat. 241.)
Words ‘‘and all prosecutions against persons for of-
fenses committed in the county of Reagan shall be
tried in the court at San Angelo: Provided, That no
civil or criminal cause begun and pending prior to May
29, 1924, shall be in any way affected,’’ words ‘‘and all
prosecutions against persons for offenses committed in
the county of Pecos shall be tried in the district court
at El Paso, or Pecos City: Provided, That no civil or
criminal cause begun and pending prior to March 2,
1923, shall be in any way affected,’’ and words ‘‘Pro-
vided, That no civil or criminal cause commenced prior
to June 24, 1930, shall be in any way affected,’’ were all
deleted as superseded by Federal Rules of Criminal Pro-
cedure, Rules 18–22, and as obsolete, in view of the lapse
of time after the dates included in such provisions.
Provisions for furnishing rooms and accommodations
at Pecos and Wichita Falls were omitted as obsolete, on
advice of the Director of the Administrative Office of
the United States Courts that Federal accommodations
are now available at such places.
Provisions relating to the maintenance of offices at
various cities by the clerks were omitted as covered by
sections 452 and 751 of this title.
Provisions that process against residents of Pecos
County shall issue from and be returnable to the court
at Pecos City and against residents of Reagan County
at San Angelo, were omitted since such matter can be
regulated more appropriately by court rule or order.
(See Rule 4 of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.)
The provisions requiring notice to be given for time
of holding court in Pecos division and at Corpus Chris-
ti, were omitted as covered by section 141 of this title.
Five counties included in this section were created
since the enactment of section 189 of title 28. These
were Kleberg County and Kenedy County of the Corpus
Christi division of the southern district, Culberson
County and Hudspeth County of the El Paso division of
the western district, and Real County of the San Anto-
nio division of the western district. Pecos County is in-
cluded in the Pecos division and omitted from the El
Paso division of the western district to conform to the
practice of the court.
Changes in arrangement and phraseology were made.
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
2024—Subsec. (d)(6). Pub. L. 118–73, which directed the
insertion of ‘‘and Alpine’’ after ‘‘Pecos’’ in the matter
preceding par. (7), was executed by making the inser-
tion after ‘‘Pecos’’ the second place appearing, to re-
flect the probable intent of Congress.
2004—Subsec. (c)(5). Pub. L. 108–455 inserted ‘‘, and
may be held anywhere within the Federal courthouse in
Texarkana that is located astride the State line be-
tween Texas and Arkansas’’ after ‘‘held at Texarkana’’.
2003—Subsec. (c)(3). Pub. L. 108–157, § 1(a)(1), sub-
stituted ‘‘Delta, Denton, Fannin, Grayson, Hopkins,
and Lamar’’ for ‘‘Denton, and Grayson’’ and inserted
‘‘and Plano’’ after ‘‘held at Sherman’’.
Subsec. (c)(4) to (7). Pub. L. 108–157, § 1(a)(2), (3), redes-
ignated pars. (5) to (7) as (4) to (6), respectively, in par.
(5) inserted ‘‘Red River,’’ after ‘‘Franklin,’’, and struck
out former par. (4) which read ‘‘The Paris Division com-
prises the counties of Delta, Fannin, Hopkins, Lamar,
and Red River.
‘‘Court for the Paris Division shall be held at Paris.’’
1984—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 98–620, § 407(a)(1), sub-
stituted ‘‘seven’’ for ‘‘six’’ in provisions preceding par.
(1).
Subsec. (b)(4). Pub. L. 98–620, § 407(a)(2), struck out
references to Hidalgo and Starr counties from the coun-
Page 54
TITLE 28—JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE
§ 125
1 So in original.
ties comprising the Brownsville Division of the South-
ern District.
Subsec. (b)(7). Pub. L. 98–620, § 407(a)(3), added par. (7).
1980—Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 96–462, § 6(a), struck out
references to Polk and Trinity counties in list of coun-
ties comprising Houston Division of Southern District.
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 96–462, § 6(b), in provisions pre-
ceding par. (1) substituted ‘‘seven’’ for ‘‘six’’; in par. (1)
struck
out
references
to
Angelina,
Houston,
Nacogdoches, and Shelby counties in list of counties
comprising Tyler Division of Eastern District; in par.
(2) struck out references to Sabine, San Augustine, and
Tyler counties in list of counties comprising Beaumont
Division of Eastern District; and added par. (7).
1967—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 90–216, § 1(4), enlarged from
six to seven the number of divisions comprising West-
ern District.
Subsec. (d)(3). Pub. L. 90–216, § 1(1), transferred coun-
ties of Brewster, Culberson, Hudspeth, and Presidio
from El Paso Division to Pecos Division.
Subsec. (d)(6). Pub. L. 90–216, § 1(2), added counties of
Brewster, Culberson, Hudspeth, and Presidio to Pecos
Division from El Paso Division, and transferred coun-
ties of Andrews, Crane, Ector, Martin, Midland, and
Upton from Pecos Division to Midland-Odessa Division.
Subsec. (d)(7). Pub. L. 90–216, § 1(3), added par. (7),
which created Midland-Odessa Division, comprised of
counties of Andrews, Crane, Ector, Martin, Midland,
and Upton, transferred from Pecos Division.
1964—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 88–282, § 1(a), struck out
Austin, Fort Bend, and Wharton counties from list
comprising Galveston Division.
Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 88–282, § 1(b), added Austin,
Fort Bend, and Wharton counties to list comprising
Houston Division.
Subsec. (c)(4). Pub. L. 88–512, § 1(a), added county of
Hopkins to Paris Division.
Subsec. (c)(5). Pub. L. 88–512, § 1(b), struck out county
of Hopkins from Marshall Division.
1961—Subsec. (c)(5). Pub. L. 87–352 changed the name
of Division from Jefferson to Marshall, and provided for
holding court at Marshall.
1957—Subsec. (c)(1). Pub. L. 85–298, § 2, inserted Shelby
County in list of counties comprising Tyler Division.
Subsec. (c)(2). Pub. L. 85–298, § 1, struck out Shelby
County from list of counties comprising Beaumont Di-
vision.
1954—Subsec. (d)(4). Act Feb. 10, 1954, § 2(b)(9)(a),
struck out Edwards County from list of counties com-
prising San Antonio Division of Western District.
Subsec. (d)(5). Act Feb. 10, 1954, § 2(b)(9)(b), inserted
Edwards County in list of counties comprising Del Rio
Division of Western District.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2003 AMENDMENT
Pub. L. 108–157, § 1(b), Dec. 3, 2003, 117 Stat. 1947, pro-
vided that:
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—This section [amending this sec-
tion] and the amendments made by this section shall
take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act
[Dec. 3, 2003].
‘‘(2) PENDING CASES NOT AFFECTED.—This section and
the amendments made by this section shall not affect
any action commenced before the effective date of this
section and pending in the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas on such date.
‘‘(3) JURIES
NOT
AFFECTED.—This section and the
amendments made by this section shall not affect the
composition, or preclude the service, of any grand or
petit jury summoned, impaneled, or actually serving in
the Eastern Judicial District of Texas on the effective
date of this section.’’
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1984 AMENDMENT
Pub. L. 98–620, title IV, § 407(b), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat.
3362, provided that: ‘‘The amendments made by sub-
section (a) of this section [amending this section] shall
apply to any action commenced in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of Texas on or
after the effective date of this subtitle [Jan. 1, 1985],
and shall not affect any action pending in such court
on such effective date.’’
Amendment by Pub. L. 98–620 effective Jan. 1, 1985,
and not to affect the composition, or preclude the serv-
ice, of any grand or petit jury summoned, impaneled, or
actually serving on that date, see section 411 of Pub. L.
98–620, set out as a note under section 85 of this title.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1980 AMENDMENT; SAVINGS
PROVISION
Amendment by Pub. L. 96–462 effective Oct. 1, 1981,
but not to affect the composition or preclude the serv-
ice of any grand or petit juror summoned, empaneled,
or actually serving in any judicial district on Oct. 1,
1981, see section 7 of Pub. L. 96–462, set out as a note
under section 84 of this title.
§ 125. Utah
Utah constitutes one judicial district com-
prising two divisions.
(1) The Northern Division comprises the
counties of Box Elder, Cache, Davis,
Morgan, Rich, and Weber.
Court for the Northern Division shall be held
at Salt Lake City and Ogden.
(2) The Central Division comprises the coun-
ties
of
Beaver,
Carbon,
Daggett,
Duchesne, Emery, Garfield, Grand, Iron,
Juab, Kane, Millard, Piute, Salt Lake,
San Juan, Sanpete, Sevier, Summit,
Tooele, Uintah, Utah, Wasatch, Wash-
ington, and Wayne.
Court for the Central Division shall be held
at Salt Lake City, Provo, St. George,
Moab, and Monticello..1
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 893; Pub. L.
104–317, title VI, § 606, Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3859;
Pub. L. 118–250, § 1, Jan. 4, 2025, 138 Stat. 2939.)
HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., § 190 (Mar. 3, 1911,
ch. 231, § 109, 36 Stat. 1127).
A provision relating to the maintenance of offices by
the clerk was omitted as covered by section 751 of this
title.
Changes in arrangement and phraseology were made.
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
2025—Pub. L. 118–250 substituted ‘‘St. George, Moab,
and Monticello.’’ for ‘‘and St. George’’.
1996—Par. (1). Pub. L. 104–317, § 606(a), inserted ‘‘Salt
Lake City and’’ before ‘‘Ogden’’.
Par. (2). Pub. L. 104–317, § 606(b), inserted ‘‘, Provo,
and St. George’’ after ‘‘Salt Lake City’’.
§ 126. Vermont
Vermont constitutes one judicial district.
Court
shall
be
held
at
Bennington,
Brattleboro,
Burlington,
Montpelier,
Rutland, Saint Johnsbury, and Windsor.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 893; Pub. L. 88–312,
May 28, 1964, 78 Stat. 201; Pub. L. 98–620, title IV,
§ 410, Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3362.)
HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., § 191 (Mar. 3, 1911,
ch. 231, § 110, 36 Stat. 1127; Feb. 1, 1912, ch. 26, 37 Stat.
58; Feb. 28, 1929, ch. 360, 45 Stat. 1345).
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Texas is divided into four judicial districts to be known as the Northern, Southern, Eastern, and Western Districts of Texas.
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 28 U.S.C. § 124
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.