Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
10 U.S.C. § 664 — Length of joint duty assignments
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 648
TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES
§ 664
Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 112–81, § 503(a)(2), substituted
‘‘the assignment’’ for ‘‘the joint duty assignment’’ and
‘‘such an assignment’’ for ‘‘a joint duty assignment’’.
Subsec. (c)(2). Pub. L. 112–81, § 2861(c), substituted
‘‘Dwight D. Eisenhower School for National Security
and Resource Strategy’’ for ‘‘Industrial College of the
Armed Forces’’.
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 112–81, § 503(b), added subsec. (d).
2008—Subsecs. (a), (b)(1). Pub. L. 110–417, in subsec.
(a), substituted ‘‘Qualified’’ for ‘‘Specialty’’ in heading
and ‘‘designated as a joint qualified officer’’ for ‘‘with
the joint specialty’’ in text, and, in subsec. (b)(1), sub-
stituted ‘‘are not designated as a joint qualified offi-
cer’’ for ‘‘do not have the joint specialty’’.
2006—Subsecs. (a), (b)(1). Pub. L. 109–364, § 518(a)(1),
(2)(A), substituted ‘‘a school within the National De-
fense University specified in subsection (c)’’ for ‘‘a
joint professional military education school’’.
Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 109–364, § 518(a)(2)(B), sub-
stituted ‘‘a school referred to in paragraph (1)’’ for ‘‘a
joint professional military education school’’.
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 109–364, § 518(b), added subsec. (c).
2004—Pub. L. 108–375, § 532(c)(2)(A), substituted ‘‘Joint
duty assignments after completion of joint professional
military education’’ for ‘‘Education’’ in section catch-
line.
Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 108–375, § 532(c)(1)(A), (B), redesig-
nated subsec. (d)(1) as (a), inserted heading, and struck
out heading and text of former subsec. (a) which related
to capstone course for new general and flag officers.
See section 2153 of this title.
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 108–375, § 532(c)(1)(C)–(F), redesig-
nated subsec. (d)(2)(A) as (b)(1) and substituted ‘‘in
parag
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 10 U.S.C. § 664
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: 46c2c8beed75c12f1df3ac66d5388a32efd88648971c7fbd72a8227c9b83b7f0. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-ea6c167ab3876c12df215eec
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-10/section-664-length-of-joint-duty-assignments--f0dd8b0deb.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: d90e8e920fb2b5d54be592c1247bad5f866c495d24c90f64871b0eed65c8c84f
Source location: USCODE-2024-title10-subtitleA-partII-chap38-sec664.pdf
Stored source content
Page 648
TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES
§ 664
Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 112–81, § 503(a)(2), substituted
‘‘the assignment’’ for ‘‘the joint duty assignment’’ and
‘‘such an assignment’’ for ‘‘a joint duty assignment’’.
Subsec. (c)(2). Pub. L. 112–81, § 2861(c), substituted
‘‘Dwight D. Eisenhower School for National Security
and Resource Strategy’’ for ‘‘Industrial College of the
Armed Forces’’.
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 112–81, § 503(b), added subsec. (d).
2008—Subsecs. (a), (b)(1). Pub. L. 110–417, in subsec.
(a), substituted ‘‘Qualified’’ for ‘‘Specialty’’ in heading
and ‘‘designated as a joint qualified officer’’ for ‘‘with
the joint specialty’’ in text, and, in subsec. (b)(1), sub-
stituted ‘‘are not designated as a joint qualified offi-
cer’’ for ‘‘do not have the joint specialty’’.
2006—Subsecs. (a), (b)(1). Pub. L. 109–364, § 518(a)(1),
(2)(A), substituted ‘‘a school within the National De-
fense University specified in subsection (c)’’ for ‘‘a
joint professional military education school’’.
Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 109–364, § 518(a)(2)(B), sub-
stituted ‘‘a school referred to in paragraph (1)’’ for ‘‘a
joint professional military education school’’.
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 109–364, § 518(b), added subsec. (c).
2004—Pub. L. 108–375, § 532(c)(2)(A), substituted ‘‘Joint
duty assignments after completion of joint professional
military education’’ for ‘‘Education’’ in section catch-
line.
Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 108–375, § 532(c)(1)(A), (B), redesig-
nated subsec. (d)(1) as (a), inserted heading, and struck
out heading and text of former subsec. (a) which related
to capstone course for new general and flag officers.
See section 2153 of this title.
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 108–375, § 532(c)(1)(C)–(F), redesig-
nated subsec. (d)(2)(A) as (b)(1) and substituted ‘‘in
paragraph (2)’’ for ‘‘in subparagraph (B)’’, redesignated
subsec. (d)(2)(B) as (b)(2) and substituted ‘‘in paragraph
(1)’’ for ‘‘in subparagraph (A)’’, and inserted subsec.
heading.
Pub. L. 108–375, § 532(b), transferred subsec. (b), relat-
ing to joint military education schools, to section
2152(b) of this title.
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 108–375, § 532(b), transferred sub-
sec. (c), relating to other professional military edu-
cation schools, to section 2152(c) of this title.
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 108–375, § 532(c)(1)(B), (C), (E), re-
designated par. (1) as subsec. (a), redesignated subpars.
(A) and (B) of par. (2) as pars. (1) and (2), respectively,
of subsec. (b), and struck out heading ‘‘Post-Education
Joint Duty Assignments’’.
Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 108–375, § 532(c)(1)(A), struck out
heading and text of subsec. (e) which related to the du-
ration of the principal course of instruction offered at
the Joint Forces Staff College. See section 2156 of this
title.
2002—Subsec. (e)(2). Pub. L. 107–314 substituted ‘‘Joint
Forces Staff College’’ for ‘‘Armed Forces Staff Col-
lege’’.
2001—Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 107–107 substituted ‘‘Joint
Forces Staff College’’ for ‘‘Armed Forces Staff College’’
in subsec. heading and in text of par. (1).
1993—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 103–160 amended subsec. (d)
generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (d) read as fol-
lows: ‘‘POST-EDUCATION DUTY ASSIGNMENTS.—The Sec-
retary of Defense shall ensure that—
‘‘(1) unless waived by the Secretary in an individual
case, each officer with the joint specialty who grad-
uates from a joint professional military education
school shall be assigned to a joint duty assignment
for that officer’s next duty assignment; and
‘‘(2) a high proportion (which shall be greater than
50 percent) of the other officers graduating from a
joint professional military education school also re-
ceive assignments to a joint duty assignment as their
next duty assignment.’’
1991—Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 102–190 designated existing
provisions as par. (1) and added par. (2).
1989—Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 101–189 added subsec. (e).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1993 AMENDMENT
Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title IX, § 933(b), Nov. 30, 1993,
107 Stat. 1736, provided that: ‘‘The amendments made
by subsection (a) [amending this section] shall apply
with respect to officers graduating from joint profes-
sional military education schools after the date of the
enactment of this Act [Nov. 30, 1993].’’
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1991 AMENDMENT
Pub. L. 102–190, div. A, title IX, § 912(b), Dec. 5, 1991,
105 Stat. 1452, as amended by Pub. L. 102–484, div. A,
title IX, § 921, Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2473, provided that
the amendment made by section 912(a)(2) of Pub. L.
102–190 to this section was not to apply with respect to
the Armed Forces Staff College until Jan. 1, 1994.
IMPLEMENTATION OF SUBSECTION (e)
Pub. L. 101–189, div. A, title XI, § 1123(c)(2), Nov. 29,
1989, 103 Stat. 1557, provided that: ‘‘Subsection (e) of
such section, as added by paragraph (1), shall be imple-
mented by the Secretary of Defense not later than two
years after the date of the enactment of this Act [Nov.
29, 1989].’’
EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS; JOINT OFFICER
MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Pub. L. 99–433, title IV, § 406(d), Oct. 1, 1986, 100 Stat.
1033, provided that:
‘‘(1) CAPSTONE COURSE.—Subsection (a) of section 663
of such title [10 U.S.C. 663(a)] (as added by section 401)
shall apply with respect to officers selected in reports
of officer selection boards submitted to the Secretary
concerned after the end of the 120-day period beginning
on the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 1, 1986].
‘‘(2) REVIEW
OF
MILITARY
EDUCATION
SCHOOLS.—(A)
The first review under subsections (b) and (c) of such
section shall be completed not later than 120 days after
the date of the enactment of this Act. The Secretary of
Defense shall submit to Congress a report on the re-
sults of the review at each Department of Defense
school not later than 60 days thereafter.
‘‘(B) Such subsections shall be implemented so that
the revised curricula take effect with respect to
courses beginning after July 1987.
‘‘(3) POST-EDUCATION DUTY ASSIGNMENTS.—Subsection
(d) of such section shall take effect with respect to
classes graduating from joint professional military
education schools after January 1987.’’
§ 664. Length of joint duty assignments
(a) GENERAL RULE.—The length of a joint duty
assignment shall be not less than two years.
(b) WAIVER AUTHORITY.—The Secretary of De-
fense may waive subsection (a) in the case of
any officer.
(c) EXCLUSIONS FROM TOUR LENGTH.—The Sec-
retary of Defense may exclude the following
service from the requirement in subsection (a):
(1) Service in a joint duty assignment in
which the full tour of duty in the assignment
is not completed by the officer because of—
(A) retirement;
(B) release from active duty;
(C) suspension from duty under section
155(f)(2) or 164(g) of this title; or
(D) a qualifying reassignment from a joint
duty assignment as prescribed by the Sec-
retary of Defense in regulations.
(2) Service in a joint duty assignment in a
case in which the officer’s tour of duty in that
assignment brings the officer’s accrued service
for purposes of subsection (d)(2) to the require-
ment in subsection (a).
(d) FULL TOUR OF DUTY.—An officer shall be
considered to have completed a full tour of duty
in a joint duty assignment upon completion of
any of the following:
Page 649
TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES
§ 664
(1) A joint duty assignment that meets the
requirement in subsection (a).
(2) Accrued joint experience in joint duty as-
signments as described in subsection (e).
(3) A joint duty assignment with respect to
which the Secretary of Defense has granted a
waiver under subsection (b), but only in a case
in which the Secretary determines that the
service completed by that officer in that duty
assignment shall be considered to be a full
tour of duty in a joint duty assignment.
(4) A second and subsequent joint duty as-
signment that is less than the period required
under subsection (a).
(e) ACCRUED JOINT EXPERIENCE.—For the pur-
poses of subsection (d)(2), the Secretary of De-
fense may prescribe, by regulation, certain joint
experience, such as temporary duty in joint as-
signments, joint individual training, and par-
ticipation in joint exercises, that may be aggre-
gated to equal a full tour of duty. The Secretary
shall prescribe the regulations with the advice
of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
(f) CONSTRUCTIVE CREDIT.—The Secretary of
Defense may award constructive credit in the
case of an officer (other than a general or flag
officer) who, for reasons of military necessity, is
reassigned from a joint duty assignment within
60 days of meeting the tour length criteria pre-
scribed in subsection (d)(1). The amount of con-
structive service that may be credited to such
officer shall be the amount sufficient for the
completion of the applicable tour of duty re-
quirement, but in no case more than 60 days.
(Added Pub. L. 99–433, title IV, § 401(a), Oct. 1,
1986, 100 Stat. 1028; amended Pub. L. 100–180, div.
A, title XIII, § 1303(a), Dec. 4, 1987, 101 Stat. 1170;
Pub. L. 100–456, div. A, title V, §§ 514, 517(b), Sept.
29, 1988, 102 Stat. 1969, 1971; Pub. L. 104–106, div.
A, title V, § 501(b), (e), (f), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat.
290, 292; Pub. L. 106–65, div. A, title X, § 1066(a)(5),
Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 770; Pub. L. 107–107, div. A,
title V, § 522, Dec. 28, 2001, 115 Stat. 1097; Pub. L.
109–364, div. A, title V, § 519(d)(1), Oct. 17, 2006,
120 Stat. 2191; Pub. L. 110–417, [div. A], title V,
§ 524, Oct. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 4446; Pub. L. 114–328,
div. A, title V, § 510, Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2110;
Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title X, § 1081(a)(9), Aug.
13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1983.)
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
2018—Subsec. (d)(1). Pub. L. 115–232 substituted ‘‘the
requirement’’ for ‘‘the the requirement’’.
2016—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 114–328, § 510(a), substituted
‘‘assignment shall be not less than two years.’’ for ‘‘as-
signment—
‘‘(1) for general and flag officers shall be not less
than two years; and
‘‘(2) for other officers shall be not less than three
years.’’
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 114–328, § 510(b), (g)(1), redesig-
nated subsec. (d) as (c) and struck out former subsec.
(c). Prior to amendment, text of subsec. (c) read as fol-
lows: ‘‘The Secretary may for purposes of section
661(c)(1)(B) of this title authorize a joint duty assign-
ment of less than the period prescribed by subsection
(a), but not less than two years, without the require-
ment for a waiver under subsection (b) in the case of an
officer—
‘‘(1) who has a military occupational specialty des-
ignated under section 668(d) of this title as a critical
occupational specialty; and
‘‘(2) for whom such joint duty assignment is the ini-
tial joint duty assignment.’’
Subsec. (c)(2). Pub. L. 114–328, § 510(g)(2), substituted
‘‘subsection (d)(2)’’ for ‘‘subsection (f)(3)’’.
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 114–328, § 510(g)(1), redesignated
subsec. (f) as (d). Former subsec. (d) redesignated (c).
Pub. L. 114–328, § 510(c)(1), substituted ‘‘the require-
ment in subsection (a)’’ for ‘‘the standards prescribed
in subsection (a)’’ in introductory provisions.
Subsec. (d)(1)(D). Pub. L. 114–328, § 510(c)(2), sub-
stituted ‘‘assignment as prescribed by the Secretary of
Defense in regulations.’’ for ‘‘assignment—
‘‘(i) for unusual personal reasons, including extreme
hardship and medical conditions, beyond the control
of the officer or the armed forces; or
‘‘(ii) to another joint duty assignment immediately
after—
‘‘(I) the officer was promoted to a higher grade, if
the reassignment was made because no joint duty
assignment was available within the same organiza-
tion that was commensurate with the officer’s new
grade; or
‘‘(II) the officer’s position was eliminated in a re-
organization.’’
Subsec. (d)(2). Pub. L. 114–328, § 510(g)(3), substituted
‘‘subsection (e)’’ for ‘‘subsection (g)’’.
Pub. L. 114–328, § 510(c)(3)–(5), redesignated par. (3) as
(2), substituted ‘‘the requirement in subsection (a)’’ for
‘‘the applicable standard prescribed in subsection (a)’’,
and struck out former par. (2) which read as follows:
‘‘Service in a joint duty assignment outside the United
States or in Alaska or Hawaii which is less than the ap-
plicable standard prescribed in subsection (a).’’
Subsec. (d)(3). Pub. L. 114–328, § 510(c)(4), redesignated
par. (3) as (2).
Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 114–328, § 510(d), (g)(1), (4), redesig-
nated subsec. (g) as (e), substituted ‘‘subsection (d)(2)’’
for ‘‘subsection (f)(3)’’, and struck out former subsec.
(e). Prior to amendment, text of subsec. (e) read as fol-
lows:
‘‘(1) The Secretary shall ensure that the average
length of joint duty assignments during any fiscal year,
measured by the lengths of the joint duty assignments
ending during that fiscal year, meets the standards pre-
scribed in subsection (a).
‘‘(2) In computing the average length of joint duty as-
signments for purposes of paragraph (1), the Secretary
may exclude the following service:
‘‘(A) Service described in subsection (c).
‘‘(B) Service described in subsection (d).
‘‘(C) Service described in subsection (f)(6).’’
Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 114–328, § 510(g)(1), (5), redesig-
nated subsec. (h) as (f) and substituted ‘‘subsection
(d)(1)’’ for ‘‘paragraphs (1), (2), and (4) of subsection (f)’’.
Former subsec. (f) redesignated (d).
Subsec. (f)(1). Pub. L. 114–328, § 510(e)(1), substituted
‘‘the requirement in subsection (a)’’ for ‘‘standards pre-
scribed in subsection (a)’’.
Subsec. (f)(2) to (6). Pub. L. 114–328, § 510(e)(2)–(4), re-
designated pars. (3), (5), and (6) as (2), (3), and (4), re-
spectively, struck out ‘‘, but not less than two years’’
before period at end of par. (4), and struck out former
pars. (2) and (4) which read as follows:
‘‘(2) A joint duty assignment under the circumstances
described in subsection (c).’’
‘‘(4) A joint duty assignment outside the United
States or in Alaska or Hawaii for which the normal ac-
companied-by-dependents tour of duty is prescribed by
regulation to be at least two years in length, if the offi-
cer serves in the assignment for a period equivalent to
the accompanied-by-dependents tour length.’’
Subsec. (g). Pub. L. 114–328, § 510(g)(1), redesignated
subsec. (g) as (e).
Subsec. (h). Pub. L. 114–328, § 510(g)(1), redesignated
subsec. (h) as (f).
Pub. L. 114–328, § 510(f), struck out par. (1) designation
before ‘‘The Secretary of Defense may’’, substituted
‘‘award’’ for ‘‘accord’’, and struck out par. (2) which
read as follows: ‘‘For the purpose of computing under
subsection (e) the average length of joint duty assign-
Page 650
TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES
§ 664
ments during a fiscal year, the amount of any construc-
tive service credited under this subsection with respect
to a joint duty assignment to be counted in that com-
putation shall be excluded.’’
2008—Subsec. (d)(1)(D). Pub. L. 110–417, § 524(a)(1),
added subpar. (D) and struck out former subpar. (D)
which read as follows: ‘‘a qualifying reassignment (as
described in subsection (g)(4)).’’
Subsec. (d)(3). Pub. L. 110–417, § 524(a)(2), added par. (3)
and struck out former par. (3) which read as follows:
‘‘Service in a joint duty assignment in a case in
which—
‘‘(A) the officer’s tour of duty in that assignment
brings the officer’s cumulative service for purposes of
subsection (f)(3) to the applicable standard prescribed
in subsection (a); and
‘‘(B) the length of time served in that assignment
(in any case other than an assignment which is de-
scribed in subsection (g)(4)(B)) was not less than two
years.’’
Subsec. (e)(2). Pub. L. 110–417, § 524(b), added par. (2)
and struck out former par. (2) which read as follows:
‘‘In computing the average length of joint duty assign-
ments for purposes of paragraph (1), the Secretary may
exclude the following service:
‘‘(A) Service described in subsection (c), except that
not more than 121⁄2 percent of all joint duty assign-
ments shown on the list published pursuant to sec-
tion 668(b)(2)(A) of this title may be so excluded in
any year.
‘‘(B) Service described in subsection (d).
‘‘(C) Service described in subsection (f)(6), except
that no more than 10 percent of all joint duty assign-
ments shown on the list published pursuant to sec-
tion 668(b)(2)(A) of this title may be so excluded in
any year.’’
Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 110–417, § 524(c), in par. (3) sub-
stituted ‘‘Accrued joint experience’’ for ‘‘Cumulative
service’’, in par. (4) struck out ‘‘(except that not more
than 6 percent of all joint duty assignments may be
considered to be under this paragraph at any time)’’ be-
fore period at end, added par. (6), and struck out former
par. (6) which read as follows ‘‘A second joint duty as-
signment that is less than the period required under
subsection (a), but not less than two years, without re-
gard to whether a waiver was granted for such assign-
ment under subsection (b).’’.
Subsec. (g). Pub. L. 110–417, § 524(d), amended subsec.
(g) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (g) related
to cumulative service of an officer in joint duty assign-
ments.
Subsec. (h). Pub. L. 110–417, § 524(e), substituted
‘‘paragraphs (1), (2), and (4) of subsection (f)’’ for ‘‘sub-
section (f)(1), (f)(2), (f)(4), or (g)(2)’’ in par. (1) and
struck out par. (3) which read as follows: ‘‘This sub-
section shall not apply in the case of an officer who
serves less than 10 months in the joint duty assign-
ment.’’
Subsec. (i). Pub. L. 110–417, § 524(f), struck out subsec.
(i) which related to joint duty credit for certain joint
task force assignments.
2006—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 109–364, in introductory pro-
visions, substituted ‘‘661(c)(1)(B)’’ for ‘‘661(c)(2)’’, redes-
ignated pars. (2) and (3) as (1) and (2), respectively, in
par. (1), substituted ‘‘668(d)’’ for ‘‘661(c)(2)’’, and struck
out former par. (1) which read as follows: ‘‘who is nomi-
nated for the joint specialty;’’.
2001—Subsec. (i)(4)(E). Pub. L. 107–107, § 522(1), sub-
stituted ‘‘Except as provided in subparagraph (F), the
joint task force’’ for ‘‘The joint task force’’.
Subsec. (i)(4)(F). Pub. L. 107–107, § 522(2), added sub-
par. (F).
1999—Subsec. (i)(2)(A). Pub. L. 106–65 substituted
‘‘February 10, 1996’’ for ‘‘the date of the enactment of
this subsection’’ in introductory provisions.
1996—Subsec. (e)(1). Pub. L. 104–106, § 501(f), struck out
‘‘(after fiscal year 1990)’’ after ‘‘any fiscal year’’.
Subsec. (e)(2)(C). Pub. L. 104–106, § 501(e)(1), added sub-
par. (E).
Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 104–106, § 501(e)(2)(A), substituted
‘‘completion of any of the following:’’ for ‘‘completion
of—’’ in introductory provisions.
Subsec. (f)(1). Pub. L. 104–106, § 501(e)(2)(B), (D), sub-
stituted ‘‘A joint duty’’ for ‘‘a joint duty’’ and ‘‘sub-
section (a).’’ for ‘‘subsection (a);’’.
Subsec. (f)(2). Pub. L. 104–106, § 501(e)(2)(B), (D), sub-
stituted ‘‘A joint duty’’ for ‘‘a joint duty’’ and ‘‘sub-
section (c).’’ for ‘‘subsection (c);’’.
Subsec. (f)(3). Pub. L. 104–106, § 501(e)(2)(C), (D), sub-
stituted ‘‘Cumulative’’ for ‘‘cumulative’’ and ‘‘sub-
section (g).’’ for ‘‘subsection (g);’’.
Subsec. (f)(4). Pub. L. 104–106, § 501(e)(2)(B), (D), sub-
stituted ‘‘A joint duty’’ for ‘‘a joint duty’’ and ‘‘any
time).’’ for ‘‘any time); or’’.
Subsec. (f)(5). Pub. L. 104–106, § 501(e)(2)(B), sub-
stituted ‘‘A joint duty’’ for ‘‘a joint duty’’.
Subsec. (f)(6). Pub. L. 104–106, § 501(e)(2)(E), added par.
(6).
Subsec. (i). Pub. L. 104–106, § 501(b), added subsec. (i).
1988—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 100–456, § 514(1)(A), sub-
stituted ‘‘two years’’ for ‘‘three years’’.
Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 100–456, § 514(1)(B), substituted
‘‘three years’’ for ‘‘three and one-half years’’.
Subsec. (c)(1). Pub. L. 100–456, § 514(2), substituted ‘‘is’’
for ‘‘has been’’ and struck out ‘‘before such assignment
begins’’ after ‘‘specialty’’.
Subsec. (d)(2). Pub. L. 100–456, § 514(3), inserted ‘‘which
is less than the applicable standard prescribed in sub-
section (a)’’ after ‘‘Hawaii’’.
Subsec. (e)(2)(A). Pub. L. 100–456, § 517(b), substituted
‘‘121⁄2 percent’’ for ‘‘10 percent’’.
Subsec. (f)(4), (5). Pub. L. 100–456, § 514(4), added pars.
(4) and (5).
Subsec. (g)(3). Pub. L. 100–456, § 514(5), substituted
‘‘shall be excluded if the officer served less than 10
months in that assignment’’ for ‘‘shall be excluded—
‘‘(A) if the officer served less than 10 months in
that assignment; and
‘‘(B) to the extent that the assignment was served
more than eight years before the date of computation
of the cumulative service.’’
Subsec. (h). Pub. L. 100–456, § 514(6), added subsec. (h).
1987—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 100–180 added subsec. (b) and
struck out former subsec. (b) which read as follows:
‘‘The Secretary of Defense may waive subsection (a) in
the case of any officer, but the Secretary shall ensure
that the average length of joint duty assignments
meets the standards prescribed in that subsection.’’
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 100–180 added subsec. (c) and
struck out former subsec. (c), ‘‘Certain officers with
critical combat operations skills’’, which read as fol-
lows: ‘‘Joint duty assignments of less than the period
prescribed by subsection (a), but not less than two
years, may be authorized for the purposes of section
661(c)(2) of this title. Such an assignment may not be
counted for the purposes of determining the average
length of joint duty assignments under subsection (b).’’
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 100–180 added subsec. (d) and
struck out former subsec. (d), ‘‘Exception’’, which read
as follows:
‘‘(1) Subsection (a) does not apply in the case of an of-
ficer who fails to complete a joint duty assignment as
the result of—
‘‘(A) retirement;
‘‘(B) separation from active duty; or
‘‘(C) suspension from duty under section 155(f)(2) or
164(g) of this title.
‘‘(2) In computing the average length of joint duty as-
signments for purposes of this section, the Secretary of
Defense shall exclude joint duty assignments not com-
pleted because of a reason specified in paragraph (1).’’
Subsecs. (e) to (g). Pub. L. 100–180 added subsecs. (e)
to (g).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2006 AMENDMENT
Pub. L. 109–364, div. A, title V, § 519(e), Oct. 17, 2006,
120 Stat. 2191, provided that: ‘‘The amendments made
by this section [amending this section, former section
667, and section 668 of this title] shall take effect on Oc-
tober 1, 2007.’’
Page 651
TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES
§ 668
RETROACTIVE JOINT SERVICE CREDIT FOR DUTY IN
CERTAIN JOINT TASK FORCES
Pub. L. 107–107, div. A, title V, § 523, Dec. 28, 2001, 115
Stat. 1097, provided that, in accordance with subsec. (i)
of this section, the Secretary of Defense was authorized
to award joint service credit to any officer who served
on the staff of a United States joint task force head-
quarters in certain operations and during certain peri-
ods, and the Secretary was required to submit to Con-
gress a report of the numbers, by service, grade, and op-
eration, of the officers given joint service credit not
later than one year after Dec. 28, 2001.
JOINT
DUTY
CREDIT
FOR
CERTAIN
DUTY
PERFORMED
DURING
OPERATIONS
DESERT
SHIELD
AND
DESERT
STORM
Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title IX, § 932, Nov. 30, 1993, 107
Stat. 1735, provided extension of authority until the
end of the 90-day period beginning on Nov. 30, 1993, to
give certain officers joint duty credit pursuant to Pub.
L. 102–484, § 933, formerly set out below.
Pub. L. 102–484, div. A, title IX, § 933, Oct. 23, 1992, 106
Stat. 2476, as amended by Pub. L. 103–35, title II,
§ 202(a)(9), May 31, 1993, 107 Stat. 101; Pub. L. 103–160,
div. A, title IX, § 932(c)(1), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1735,
temporarily authorized the Secretary of Defense to
give an officer who had completed service during the
period beginning on Aug. 2, 1990, and ending on Feb. 28,
1991, in an assignment in the Persian Gulf combat zone,
credit, on a case-by-case basis, for having completed a
full tour of duty in a joint duty assignment, or credit
countable for determining cumulative service in joint
duty assignments, for the purposes of any provision of
this title, notwithstanding the length of such service or
whether that service had been within the definition of
‘‘joint duty assignment’’ in section 668 of this title, and
provided that such authority would expire at the end of
the six-month period beginning on Oct. 23, 1992.
LENGTH OF JOINT DUTY ASSIGNMENTS
Pub. L. 99–433, title IV, § 406(e), Oct. 1, 1986, 100 Stat.
1034, provided that: ‘‘Subsection (a) of section 664 of
title 10, United States Code (as added by section 401),
shall apply to officers assigned to joint duty assign-
ments after the end of the 90-day period beginning on
the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 1, 1986]. In
computing an average under subsection (b) of such sec-
tion, only joint duty assignments to which such sub-
section applies shall be considered.’’
WAIVER OF QUALIFICATIONS FOR APPOINTMENT AS
SERVICE CHIEF
For waiver of the requirements of this section for the
length of a joint duty assignment, see section 532(c) of
Pub. L. 99–433, formerly set out as a note under section
3033 of this title.
§ 665. Procedures for monitoring careers of joint
qualified officers
(a) PROCEDURES.—(1) The Secretary of Defense,
with the advice of the Chairman of the Joint
Chiefs of Staff, shall establish procedures for
overseeing the careers of—
(A) officers designated as a joint qualified of-
ficer; and
(B) other officers who serve in joint duty as-
signments.
(2) Such oversight shall include monitoring of
the implementation of the career guidelines es-
tablished under section 661(e) of this title.
(b) FUNCTION OF JOINT STAFF.—The Secretary
shall take such action as necessary to enhance
the capabilities of the Joint Staff so that it
can—
(1) monitor the promotions and career as-
signments of officers designated as a joint
qualified officer and of other officers who have
served in joint duty assignments; and
(2) otherwise advise the Chairman on joint
personnel matters.
(Added Pub. L. 99–433, title IV, § 401(a), Oct. 1,
1986, 100 Stat. 1028; amended Pub. L. 110–417, [div.
A], title V, § 522(c)(1), (2), Oct. 14, 2008, 122 Stat.
4445.)
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
2008—Pub. L. 110–417 in section catchline substituted
‘‘joint qualified officers’’ for ‘‘joint officers’’ and in
subsecs. (a)(1)(A) and (b)(1) substituted ‘‘designated as
a joint qualified officer’’ for ‘‘with the joint specialty’’.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
TRANSITION TO JOINT OFFICER PERSONNEL POLICY
Procedures under subsec. (a) of this section to be es-
tablished not later than the end of the eight-month pe-
riod beginning Oct. 1, 1986, and provisions of subsec. (b)
of this section to be implemented not later than the
end of such period, see section 406(c) of Pub. L. 99–433,
set out as a note under section 661 of this title.
§ 666. Reserve officers not on the active-duty list
The Secretary of Defense shall establish per-
sonnel policies emphasizing education and expe-
rience in joint matters for reserve officers not
on the active-duty list. Such policies shall, to
the extent practicable for the reserve compo-
nents, be similar to the policies provided by this
chapter.
(Added Pub. L. 99–433, title IV, § 401(a), Oct. 1,
1986, 100 Stat. 1028.)
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
TRANSITION TO JOINT OFFICER PERSONNEL POLICY
Personnel policies under this section to be estab-
lished not later than the end of the eight-month period
beginning Oct. 1, 1986, see section 406(c) of Pub. L.
99–433, set out as a note under section 661 of this title.
[§ 667. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title V,
§ 505(a)(1), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3356]
Section, added Pub. L. 99–433, title IV, § 401(a), Oct. 1,
1986, 100 Stat. 1029; amended Pub. L. 100–180, div. A,
title XIII, § 1304(a), Dec. 4, 1987, 101 Stat. 1172; Pub. L.
100–456, div. A, title V, § 512(b), Sept. 29, 1988, 102 Stat.
1968; Pub. L. 101–189, div. A, title XI, § 1123(d), Nov. 29,
1989, 103 Stat. 1557; Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title V,
§ 501(c), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 292; Pub. L. 107–107, div.
A, title V, § 524, title X, § 1048(a)(7), Dec. 28, 2001, 115
Stat. 1098, 1223; Pub. L. 109–364, div. A, title V,
§ 519(d)(2), Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2191; Pub. L. 110–417,
[div. A], title V, § 522(d), Oct. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 4445;
Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title V, § 503, Oct. 28, 2009, 123
Stat. 2277, related to annual report to Congress.
§ 668. Definitions
(a) JOINT MATTERS.—(1) In this chapter, the
term ‘‘joint matters’’ means matters related to
any of the following:
(A) The development or achievement of stra-
tegic objectives through the synchronization,
coordination, and organization of integrated
forces in operations conducted across domains,
such as land, sea, or air, in space, or in the in-
formation environment, including matters re-
lating to any of the following:
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Joint Qualified Officers.—** The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that each officer designated as a joint qualified officer who graduates from a school within the National Defense University specified in subsection (c) shall be assigned to a joint duty assignment for that officer’s next duty assignment after such graduation (unless the officer receives a waiver of that requirement by the Secretary in an individual case).
**(b) Other Officers.—**
(1) The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that a high proportion (which shall be greater than 50 percent) of the officers graduating from a school within the National Defense University specified in subsection (c) who are not designated as a joint qualified officer shall receive assignments to a joint duty assignment (or, as authorized by the Secretary in an individual case, to a joint assignment other than a joint duty assignment) as their next duty assignment after such graduation or, to the extent authorized in paragraph (2), as their second duty assignment after such graduation.
(2) The Secretary may, if the Secretary determines that it is necessary to do so for the efficient management of officer personnel, establish procedures to allow up to one-half of the officers subject to the assignment requirement in paragraph (1) to be assigned to such an assignment as their second (rather than first) assignment after such graduation from a school referred to in paragraph (1).
**(c) Covered Schools Within the National Defense University.—** For purposes of this section, a school within the National Defense University specified in this subsection is one of the following:
(1) The National War College.
(2) The Dwight D. Eisenhower School for National Security and Resource Strategy.
(3) The Joint Forces Staff College.
**(
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 663
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 10 U.S.C. § 663. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 647
TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES
§ 663
2006—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 109–364 inserted ‘‘and’’ at
end of par. (1), added par. (2), and struck out former
pars. (2) and (3) which read as follows:
‘‘(2) officers who have the joint specialty are ex-
pected, as a group, to be promoted—
‘‘(A) during the period beginning on December 28,
2001, and ending on December 27, 2006, at a rate not
less than the rate for officers of the same armed force
in the same grade and competitive category; and
‘‘(B) after December 27, 2006, at a rate not less than
the rate for officers of the same armed force in the
same grade and competitive category who are serving
on, or have served on, the headquarters staff of their
armed force; and
‘‘(3) officers who are serving in, or have served in,
joint duty assignments (other than officers covered in
paragraphs (1) and (2)) are expected, as a group, to be
promoted to the next higher grade at a rate not less
than the rate for all officers of the same armed force in
the same grade and competitive category.’’
2004—Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 108–375 substituted ‘‘De-
cember 27, 2006’’ for ‘‘December 27, 2004’’ in two places.
2002—Subsec. (a)(2)(A). Pub. L. 107–314, § 1062(a)(4)(A),
substituted ‘‘during the period beginning on December
28, 2001, and ending on December 27, 2004,’’ for ‘‘during
the three-year period beginning on the date of the en-
actment of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2002,’’.
Subsec. (a)(2)(B). Pub. L. 107–314, § 1062(a)(4)(B), sub-
stituted ‘‘after December 27, 2004’’ for ‘‘after the end of
the period specified in subparagraph (A)’’.
2001—Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 107–107 substituted ‘‘pro-
moted—’’ for ‘‘promoted at a rate’’, added subpar. (A),
designated ‘‘not less than the rate for officers of t
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 10 U.S.C. § 663
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 10 U.S.C. § 663. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) General Rule.—** The length of a joint duty assignment shall be not less than two years.
**(b) Waiver Authority.—** The Secretary of Defense may waive subsection (a) in the case of any officer.
**(c) Exclusions From Tour Length.—** The Secretary of Defense may exclude the following service from the requirement in subsection (a):
(1) Service in a joint duty assignment in which the full tour of duty in the assignment is not completed by the officer because of—
(A) retirement;
(B) release from active duty;
(C) suspension from duty under section 155(f)(2) or 164(g) of this title; or
(D) a qualifying reassignment from a joint duty assignment as prescribed by the Secretary of Defense in regulations.
(2) Service in a joint duty assignment in a case in which the officer’s tour of duty in that assignment brings the officer’s accrued service for purposes of subsection (d)(2) to the requirement in subsection (a).
**(d) Full Tour of Duty.—** An officer shall be considered to have completed a full tour of duty in a joint duty assignment upon completion of any of the following:
(1) A joint duty assignment that meets the requirement in subsection (a).
(2) Accrued joint experience in joint duty assignments as described in subsection (e).
(3) A joint duty assignment with respect to which the Secretary of Defense has granted a waiver under subsection (b), but only in a case in which the Secretary determines that the service completed by that officer in that duty assignment shall be considered to be a full tour of duty in a joint duty assignment.
(4) A second and subsequent joint duty assignment that is less than the period required under subsection (a).
**(e) Accrued Joint Experience.—** For the purposes of subsection (d)(2), the Secretary of Defense may presc
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 664
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.