Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
6 U.S.C. § 1117 — Roles of the Department of Homeland Se-
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 448
TITLE 6—DOMESTIC SECURITY
§ 1117
1 So in original. Probably should not be capitalized.
‘‘(I) determines that such deployment is nec-
essary to meet operational or security needs;
and
‘‘(II) notifies the applicable large hub airport
described in clause (i).
‘‘(iii) NONDEPLOYABLE
CANINES.—Any certified
canine provided to the TSA under clause (i) that
does not complete training for deployment under
that clause shall be the responsibility of the large
hub airport unless the TSA agrees to a different
outcome.
‘‘(C) HANDLERS.—Not later than 30 days before a
canine begins training to become a certified canine
under subparagraph (B), the airport shall notify the
TSA of such training and the Administrator shall
assign a TSA canine handler to participate in the
training with that canine, as appropriate.
‘‘(D) LIMITATION.—The Administrator may not re-
duce the staffing allocation model for an applicable
large hub airport based on that airport’s provision
of a certified canine under this paragraph.
‘‘(j) DEFINITIONS.—In this section:
‘‘(1) APPLICABLE LARGE HUB AIRPORT.—The term ‘ap-
plicable large hub airport’ means a large hub airport
(as defined in section 40102 of title 49, United States
Code) that has less than 100 percent of the allocated
passenger screening canine teams staffed by the TSA.
‘‘(2) AVIATION
STAKEHOLDER.—The term ‘aviation
stakeholder’ includes an airport, airport operator,
and air carrier.
‘‘SEC. 1929. TRACKING AND MONITORING OF CA-
NINE TRAINING AND TESTING.
‘‘Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment
of this Act [Oct. 5, 2018], the Administrator [of the
Transportation Security Administration] shall use, to
the extent practicable, a digital monitoring system for
all training, testing, and validation or certifica
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 6 U.S.C. § 1117
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: fea8c9b23089ac1e17bc3c52eae3ade45c19343b3c439e9e38283f9af12a27bf. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-e7d0cc9682fc7ae8e63cf015
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-6/section-1117-roles-of-the-department-of-homeland-se--6bc49df69c.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 89efb63a06f93fed36f0cfc72d4d87f304b0c0066d71b1b951c63cd14b5319c6
Source location: USCODE-2024-title6-chap4-subchapII-sec1117.pdf
Stored source content
Page 448
TITLE 6—DOMESTIC SECURITY
§ 1117
1 So in original. Probably should not be capitalized.
‘‘(I) determines that such deployment is nec-
essary to meet operational or security needs;
and
‘‘(II) notifies the applicable large hub airport
described in clause (i).
‘‘(iii) NONDEPLOYABLE
CANINES.—Any certified
canine provided to the TSA under clause (i) that
does not complete training for deployment under
that clause shall be the responsibility of the large
hub airport unless the TSA agrees to a different
outcome.
‘‘(C) HANDLERS.—Not later than 30 days before a
canine begins training to become a certified canine
under subparagraph (B), the airport shall notify the
TSA of such training and the Administrator shall
assign a TSA canine handler to participate in the
training with that canine, as appropriate.
‘‘(D) LIMITATION.—The Administrator may not re-
duce the staffing allocation model for an applicable
large hub airport based on that airport’s provision
of a certified canine under this paragraph.
‘‘(j) DEFINITIONS.—In this section:
‘‘(1) APPLICABLE LARGE HUB AIRPORT.—The term ‘ap-
plicable large hub airport’ means a large hub airport
(as defined in section 40102 of title 49, United States
Code) that has less than 100 percent of the allocated
passenger screening canine teams staffed by the TSA.
‘‘(2) AVIATION
STAKEHOLDER.—The term ‘aviation
stakeholder’ includes an airport, airport operator,
and air carrier.
‘‘SEC. 1929. TRACKING AND MONITORING OF CA-
NINE TRAINING AND TESTING.
‘‘Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment
of this Act [Oct. 5, 2018], the Administrator [of the
Transportation Security Administration] shall use, to
the extent practicable, a digital monitoring system for
all training, testing, and validation or certification of
public and private canine assets utilized or funded by
the TSA [Transportation Security Administration] to
facilitate improved review, data analysis, and record
keeping of canine testing performance and program ad-
ministration.’’
EXPANSION OF NATIONAL EXPLOSIVES DETECTION
CANINE TEAM PROGRAM
Pub. L. 115–254, div. K, title I, § 1971, Oct. 5, 2018, 132
Stat. 3613, provided that:
‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary [of Homeland Secu-
rity], where appropriate, shall encourage State, local,
and tribal governments and private owners of high-risk
transportation
facilities
to
strengthen
security
through the use of explosives detection canine teams.
‘‘(b) INCREASED CAPACITY.—
‘‘(1) IN
GENERAL.—Before the date the Inspector
General of the Department [of Homeland Security]
submits the report under section 1970 [132 Stat. 3612],
the Administrator [of the Transportation Security
Administration] may increase the number of State
and local surface and maritime transportation ca-
nines by not more than 70 explosives detection canine
teams.
‘‘(2) ADDITIONAL TEAMS.—Beginning on the date the
Inspector General of the Department submits the re-
port under section 1970, the Secretary may increase
the State and local surface and maritime transpor-
tation canines up to 200 explosives detection canine
teams unless more are identified in the risk-based
surface transportation security strategy under sec-
tion 1964 [enacting provisions set out as a note under
section 114 of Title 49, Transportation], consistent
with section 1965 [enacting provisions set out as a
note under section 114 of Title 49] or with the Presi-
dent’s most recent budget submitted under section
1105 of title 31, United States Code.
‘‘(3) RECOMMENDATIONS.—Before initiating any in-
crease in the number of explosives detection teams
under paragraph (2), the Secretary shall consider any
recommendations in the report under section 1970 on
the efficacy and management of the explosives detec-
tion canine program.
‘‘(c) DEPLOYMENT.—The Secretary shall—
‘‘(1) use the additional explosives detection canine
teams, as described in subsection (b)(1), as part of the
Department’s efforts to strengthen security across
the Nation’s surface and maritime transportation
networks;
‘‘(2) make available explosives detection canine
teams to all modes of transportation, subject to the
requirements under section 1968 [amending section
1112 of this title and enacting provisions set out as a
note under section 114 of Title 49], to address specific
vulnerabilities or risks, on an as-needed basis and as
otherwise determined appropriate by the Secretary;
and
‘‘(3) consider specific needs and training require-
ments for explosives detection canine teams to be de-
ployed across the Nation’s surface and maritime
transportation networks, including in venues of mul-
tiple modes of transportation, as the Secretary con-
siders appropriate.
‘‘(d) AUTHORIZATION.—There are authorized to be ap-
propriated to the Secretary to the extent of appropria-
tions to carry out this section for each of fiscal years
2019 through 2021.’’
[For definition of ‘‘explosives detection canine
teams’’ as used in section 1971 of Pub. L. 115–254, set out
above, see section 1902 of Pub. L. 115–254, set out as a
note under section 101 of Title 49, Transportation.]
§ 1117. Roles of the Department of Homeland Se-
curity and the Department of Transportation
The Secretary of Homeland Security is the
principal Federal official responsible for trans-
portation security. The roles and responsibil-
ities of the Department of Homeland Security
and the Department of Transportation in car-
rying out this chapter are the roles and respon-
sibilities of such Departments pursuant to the
Aviation and Transportation Security Act (Pub-
lic Law 107–71); the Intelligence Reform and Ter-
rorism Prevention Act of 2004 (Public Law
108–458); the National Infrastructure Protection
Plan required by Homeland Security Presi-
dential Directive–7; The 1
Homeland Security
Act of 2002 [6 U.S.C. 101 et seq.]; The 1 National
Response Plan; Executive Order No. 13416:
Strengthening Surface Transportation Security,
dated December 5, 2006; the Memorandum of Un-
derstanding between the Department and the
Department of Transportation on Roles and Re-
sponsibilities, dated September 28, 2004, and any
and all subsequent annexes to this Memorandum
of Understanding; and any other relevant agree-
ments between the two Departments.
(Pub. L. 110–53, title XIII, § 1310, Aug. 3, 2007, 121
Stat. 400.)
Editorial Notes
REFERENCES IN TEXT
This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original
a reference to titles XII, XIII, XIV, and XV of Pub. L.
110–53, which enacted this chapter, amended section
1992 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, section
70105 of Title 46, Shipping, and sections 114, 5103a, 14504,
20106, 20109, 24301, 28101, 31105, and 46301 of Title 49,
Transportation, enacted provisions set out as notes
under section 1101 of this title and sections 114, 13908,
and 14504 of Title 49, and amended provisions set out as
a note under section 14504 of Title 49. For complete
classification of titles XII to XV to the Code, see Ta-
bles.
The Aviation and Transportation Security Act, re-
ferred to in text, is Pub. L. 107–71, Nov. 19, 2001, 115
Page 449
TITLE 6—DOMESTIC SECURITY
§ 1118
1 So in original. The semicolon probably should be a period.
Stat. 597. For complete classification of this Act to the
Code, see Short Title of 2001 Amendment note set out
under section 40101 of Title 49, Transportation, and Ta-
bles.
The Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention
Act of 2004, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 108–458, Dec.
17, 2004, 118 Stat. 3638. For complete classification of
this Act to the Code, see Tables.
The Homeland Security Act of 2002, referred to in
text, is Pub. L. 107–296, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2135,
which is classified principally to chapter 1 (§ 101 et seq.)
of this title. For complete classification of this Act to
the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 101
of this title and Tables.
Executive Order No. 13416, referred to in text, is set
out as a note under section 1101 of this title.
§ 1118. Biometrics expansion
(a) In general
The Administrator and the Commissioner of
U.S. Customs and Border Protection shall con-
sult with each other on the deployment of bio-
metric technologies.
(b) Rule of construction
Nothing in this section shall be construed to
permit the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and
Border Protection to facilitate or expand the de-
ployment of biometric technologies, or other-
wise collect, use, or retain biometrics, not au-
thorized by any provision of or amendment
made by the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism
Prevention Act of 2004 (Public Law 108–458; 118
Stat. 3638) or the Implementing Recommenda-
tions of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007 (Public
Law 110–53; 121 Stat. 266).
(c) Report required
Not later than 270 days after October 5, 2018,
the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate
committees of Congress, and to any Member of
Congress upon the request of that Member, a re-
port that includes specific assessments from the
Administrator and the Commissioner of U.S.
Customs and Border Protection with respect to
the following:
(1) The operational and security impact of
using biometric technology to identify trav-
elers.
(2) The potential effects on privacy of the ex-
pansion of the use of biometric technology
under paragraph (1), including methods pro-
posed or implemented to mitigate any risks to
privacy identified by the Administrator or the
Commissioner related to the active or passive
collection of biometric data.
(3) Methods to analyze and address any
matching performance errors related to race,
gender, or age identified by the Administrator
with respect to the use of biometric tech-
nology, including the deployment of facial rec-
ognition technology; 1
(4) With respect to the biometric entry-exit
program, the following:
(A) Assessments of—
(i) the error rates, including the rates of
false positives and false negatives, and ac-
curacy of biometric technologies;
(ii) the effects of biometric technologies,
to ensure that such technologies do not
unduly burden categories of travelers, such
as a certain race, gender, or nationality;
(iii) the extent to which and how biomet-
ric technologies could address instances of
travelers to the United States overstaying
their visas, including—
(I) an estimate of how often biometric
matches are contained in an existing
database;
(II) an estimate of the rate at which
travelers using fraudulent credentials
identifications are accurately rejected;
and
(III) an assessment of what percentage
of the detection of fraudulent identifica-
tions could have been accomplished
using conventional methods;
(iv) the effects on privacy of the use of
biometric technologies, including methods
to mitigate any risks to privacy identified
by the Administrator or the Commissioner
of U.S. Customs and Border Protection re-
lated to the active or passive collection of
biometric data; and
(v) the number of individuals who stay in
the United States after the expiration of
their visas each year.
(B) A description of—
(i) all audits performed to assess—
(I) error rates in the use of biometric
technologies; or
(II) whether the use of biometric tech-
nologies and error rates in the use of
such technologies disproportionately af-
fect a certain race, gender, or nation-
ality; and
(ii) the results of the audits described in
clause (i).
(C) A description of the process by which
domestic travelers are able to opt-out of
scanning using biometric technologies.
(D) A description of—
(i)
what
traveler
data
is
collected
through scanning using biometric tech-
nologies, what agencies have access to
such data, and how long the agencies pos-
sess such data;
(ii) specific actions that the Department
and other relevant Federal departments
and agencies take to safeguard such data;
and
(iii) a short-term goal for the prompt de-
letion of the data of individual United
States citizens after such data is used to
verify traveler identities.
(d) Publication of assessments
The Secretary, the Administrator, and the
Commissioner shall, if practicable, publish a
public version of the assessment required by
subsection (c)(2) on the Internet website of the
TSA and of the U.S. Customs and Border Protec-
tion.
(Pub. L. 115–254, div. K, title I, § 1919, Oct. 5, 2018,
132 Stat. 3559.)
Editorial Notes
REFERENCES IN TEXT
The Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention
Act of 2004, referred to in subsec. (b), is Pub. L. 108–458,
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Activities** The Center shall—
(1) receive, aggregate, analyze, and secure, using processes consistent with the processes developed pursuant to the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act of 2015 ([6 U.S.C. 1501](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title6-section1501&num=0&edition=prelim) et seq.) reports from covered entities related to a covered cyber incident to assess the effectiveness of security controls, identify tactics, techniques, and procedures adversaries use to overcome those controls and other cybersecurity purposes, including to assess potential impact of cyber incidents on public health and safety and to enhance situational awareness of cyber threats across critical infrastructure sectors;
(2) coordinate and share information with appropriate Federal departments and agencies to identify and track ransom payments, including those utilizing virtual currencies;
(3) leverage information gathered about cyber incidents to—
(A) enhance the quality and effectiveness of information sharing and coordination efforts with appropriate entities, including agencies, sector coordinating councils, Information Sharing and Analysis Organizations, State, local, Tribal, and territorial governments, technology providers, critical infrastructure owners and operators, cybersecurity and cyber incident response firms, and security researchers; and
(B) provide appropriate entities, including sector coordinating councils, Information Sharing and Analysis Organizations, State, local, Tribal, and territorial governments, technology providers, cybersecurity and cyber incident response firms, and security researchers, with timely, actionable, and anonymized reports of cyber incident campaigns and trends, including, to the maximum extent practicable
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 6 U.S.C. § 101
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 6 U.S.C. § 101. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 6
TITLE 6—DOMESTIC SECURITY
§ 101
1 See References in Text note below.
2 So in original. A closing parenthesis probably should precede
the period.
Sec.
677f.
Authorization of appropriations.
677g.
Sunset.
PART D—CYBER INCIDENT REPORTING
681.
Definitions.
681a.
Cyber incident review.
681b.
Required reporting of certain cyber incidents.
681c.
Voluntary reporting of other cyber incidents.
681d.
Noncompliance with required reporting.
681e.
Information shared with or provided to the
Federal Government.
681f.
Cyber Incident Reporting Council.
681g.
Federal sharing of incident reports.
§ 101. Definitions
In this chapter, the following definitions
apply:
(1) Each of the terms ‘‘American homeland’’
and ‘‘homeland’’ means the United States.
(2) The term ‘‘appropriate congressional
committee’’ means any committee of the
House of Representatives or the Senate having
legislative or oversight jurisdiction under the
Rules of the House of Representatives or the
Senate, respectively, over the matter con-
cerned.
(3) The term ‘‘assets’’ includes contracts, fa-
cilities, property, records, unobligated or un-
expended balances of appropriations, and other
funds or resources (other than personnel).
(4) The term ‘‘critical infrastructure’’ has
the meaning given that term in section
5195c(e) of title 42.
(5) The term ‘‘Department’’ means the De-
partment of Homeland Security.
(6) The term ‘‘emergency response pro-
viders’’ includes Federal, State, and local gov-
ernmental and nongovernmental emergency
public safety, fire, law enforcement, emer-
gency response, emergency medical (including
hospital emergency facilities), and related per-
sonnel, agencies, and authorities.
(7) The term ‘‘EMP’’ means an electro-
magnetic pulse caused by a nuclear
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 6 U.S.C. § 101
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 6 U.S.C. § 101. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
The Secretary of Homeland Security is the principal Federal official responsible for transportation security. The roles and responsibilities of the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Transportation in carrying out this chapter are the roles and responsibilities of such Departments pursuant to the Aviation and Transportation Security Act (Public Law 107–71); the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (Public Law 108–458); the National Infrastructure Protection Plan required by Homeland Security Presidential Directive–7; The 11 So in original. Probably should not be capitalized. Homeland Security Act of 2002 [[6 U.S.C. 101](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title6-section101&num=0&edition=prelim) et seq.]; The 1 National Response Plan; Executive Order No. 13416: Strengthening Surface Transportation Security, dated December 5, 2006; the Memorandum of Understanding between the Department and the Department of Transportation on Roles and Responsibilities, dated September 28, 2004, and any and all subsequent annexes to this Memorandum of Understanding; and any other relevant agreements between the two Departments.
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 6 U.S.C. § 1117
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.