Arkansas Legal Resource Navigator

25 U.S.C. § 668 — Omitted

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

25 U.S.C. § 668 — Omitted

Page 165 TITLE 25—INDIANS § 669 § 653. Omitted Editorial Notes CODIFICATION Section, act May 18, 1928, ch. 624, § 3, 45 Stat. 602, which related to settlement of claims notwithstanding statutes of limitation, amount of decree, and set-off of payments, was omitted from the Code as being of spe- cial and not general application. § 654. Omitted Editorial Notes CODIFICATION Section, act May 18, 1928, ch. 624, § 4, 45 Stat. 602, which related to the filing and verification of claims, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application. § 655. Omitted Editorial Notes CODIFICATION Section, act May 18, 1928, ch. 624, § 5, 45 Stat. 602, which provided for reimbursement of the State of Cali- fornia for necessary costs and expenses in the event that the court rendered judgment against the United States under the provisions of this subchapter, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not gen- eral application. § 656. Omitted Editorial Notes CODIFICATION Section, act May 18, 1928, ch. 624, § 6, 45 Stat. 603, which provided for judgments to be placed in the Treas- ury of the United States to the credit of the Indians of California and to accrue interest at the rate of 4 per centum per annum, and which set out authorized uses for the fund, was omitted from the Code as being of spe- cial and not general application. § 657. Omitted Editorial Notes CODIFICATION Section, act May 18, 1928, ch. 624, § 7, 45 Stat. 603; Apr. 29, 1930, ch. 222, 46 Stat. 259; June 30, 1948, ch. 765, § 1, 62 Stat. 1166; May 24, 1950, ch. 196, § 1, 64 Stat. 189; June 8, 1954, ch. 271, § 1, 68 Stat. 240, which related to revision of the roll of the Indians of California, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general appli- cation. § 6

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 25 U.S.C. § 668

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.

Original supplied file — preserved unchanged

Download original Markdown file

File SHA-256: 5482caf8d27ae5256f346b231ad299fd93f2285d7126aebf2ec8a73edef06ae4. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.

Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.

Open the recorded source website ↗

Record provenance

Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-de63fa8b0a8023564367805a
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-25/section-668-omitted--18dd6128d4.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: d3692d7652c96c3f4fb879ad80a9b1afccbb08282b43ab066f344383558ea9e9

Source location: USCODE-2024-title25-chap14-subchapXXVI-sec668.pdf

Stored source content

Page 165 TITLE 25—INDIANS § 669 § 653. Omitted Editorial Notes CODIFICATION Section, act May 18, 1928, ch. 624, § 3, 45 Stat. 602, which related to settlement of claims notwithstanding statutes of limitation, amount of decree, and set-off of payments, was omitted from the Code as being of spe- cial and not general application. § 654. Omitted Editorial Notes CODIFICATION Section, act May 18, 1928, ch. 624, § 4, 45 Stat. 602, which related to the filing and verification of claims, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application. § 655. Omitted Editorial Notes CODIFICATION Section, act May 18, 1928, ch. 624, § 5, 45 Stat. 602, which provided for reimbursement of the State of Cali- fornia for necessary costs and expenses in the event that the court rendered judgment against the United States under the provisions of this subchapter, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not gen- eral application. § 656. Omitted Editorial Notes CODIFICATION Section, act May 18, 1928, ch. 624, § 6, 45 Stat. 603, which provided for judgments to be placed in the Treas- ury of the United States to the credit of the Indians of California and to accrue interest at the rate of 4 per centum per annum, and which set out authorized uses for the fund, was omitted from the Code as being of spe- cial and not general application. § 657. Omitted Editorial Notes CODIFICATION Section, act May 18, 1928, ch. 624, § 7, 45 Stat. 603; Apr. 29, 1930, ch. 222, 46 Stat. 259; June 30, 1948, ch. 765, § 1, 62 Stat. 1166; May 24, 1950, ch. 196, § 1, 64 Stat. 189; June 8, 1954, ch. 271, § 1, 68 Stat. 240, which related to revision of the roll of the Indians of California, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general appli- cation. § 658. Omitted Editorial Notes CODIFICATION Section, act May 24, 1950, ch. 196, § 2, 64 Stat. 190, which provided for a distribution of $150 from the judg- ment fund to each enrolled Indian, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general applica- tion. § 659. Omitted Editorial Notes CODIFICATION Section, Pub. L. 90–507, § 1, Sept. 21, 1968, 82 Stat. 860, which related to roll of persons of Indian blood who were born on or before and were living on Sept. 21, 1968, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application. § 660. Omitted Editorial Notes CODIFICATION Section, Pub. L. 90–507, § 2, Sept. 21, 1968, 82 Stat. 860, which provided for the 1964 appropriation for certain judgments to be distributed to tribe members in equal shares, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application. § 661. Omitted Editorial Notes CODIFICATION Section, Pub. L. 90–507, § 3, Sept. 21, 1968, 82 Stat. 860; Pub. L. 91–64, Aug. 25, 1969, 83 Stat. 105, which provided for the undistributed balance of the 1945 appropriation for certain judgments to be distributed in equal shares to tribe members, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application. § 662. Omitted Editorial Notes CODIFICATION Section, Pub. L. 90–507, § 4, Sept. 21, 1968, 82 Stat. 861, which related to payment of shares to heirs of deceased enrollees and persons under twenty-one years of age or otherwise under legal disability and provided that funds distributed under former sections 659 to 663 of this title would not be subject to Federal or State in- come taxes, was omitted from the Code as being of spe- cial and not general application. § 663. Omitted Editorial Notes CODIFICATION Section, Pub. L. 90–507, § 5, Sept. 21, 1968, 82 Stat. 861, which authorized Secretary of the Interior to prescribe rules and regulations to carry out the provisions of former sections 659 to 663 of this title, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general appli- cation. SUBCHAPTER XXVI—SOUTHERN UTE INDIAN TRIBE OF COLORADO § 668. Omitted Editorial Notes CODIFICATION Section, Pub. L. 92–312, § 1, June 14, 1972, 86 Stat. 216, which related to the sale of lands held by the United States, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application. § 669. Omitted Editorial Notes CODIFICATION Section, Pub. L. 92–312, § 2, June 14, 1972, 86 Stat. 216, which required that all funds derived from the sale of lands pursuant to this subchapter be used for the pur- chase of real property within the boundaries of the Southern Ute Indian Reservation, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general applica- tion.

Cross-references

Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

25 U.S.C. § 668 — Omitted

### Statutory Notes #### Codification Section, Pub. L. 92–312, § 1, June 14, 1972, 86 Stat. 216, which related to the sale of lands held by the United States, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 25 U.S.C. § 668

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.