Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
18 U.S.C. § 3668 — Remission or mitigation of forfeitures
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 873
TITLE 18—CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
§ 3669
Section consolidates sections 222 and 224 of title 27,
U.S.C., 1940 ed., with changes in phraseology and ar-
rangement necessary to effect the consolidation. Said
section 222 is also incorporated in section 1262 of this
title.
Definition of ‘‘State’’ in section 222 of title 27 U.S.C.,
1940 ed., as meaning and including ‘‘every State, Terri-
tory, and Possession of the United States,’’ was omit-
ted because the words ‘‘Territory, District,’’ and so
forth, appear after ‘‘State’’ in sections 1262, 1265, of this
title, which are the only sections in chapter 59, consti-
tuting sections 1261–1265 of this title, to which such def-
inition would have been applicable.
Changes made in phraseology.
§ 3668. Remission or mitigation of forfeitures
under liquor laws; possession pending trial
(a) JURISDICTION OF COURT
Whenever, in any proceeding in court for the
forfeiture, under the internal-revenue laws, of
any vehicle or aircraft seized for a violation of
the internal-revenue laws relating to liquors,
such forfeiture is decreed, the court shall have
exclusive jurisdiction to remit or mitigate the
forfeiture.
(b) CONDITIONS
PRECEDENT
TO
REMISSION
OR
MITIGATION
In any such proceeding the court shall not
allow the claim of any claimant for remission or
mitigation unless and until he proves (1) that he
has an interest in such vehicle or aircraft, as
owner or otherwise, which he acquired in good
faith, (2) that he had at no time any knowledge
or reason to believe that it was being or would
be used in the violation of laws of the United
States or of any State relating to liquor, and (3)
if it appears that the interest asserted by the
claimant arises out of or is in any way subject
to any contract or agr
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 18 U.S.C. § 3668
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: cb44f09e09e0ba4082db43c4fa37e9cf35148a8b5a3682c19e48f36f28b42303. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-dc4e5ee3825de647b2d551e0
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-18/section-3668-remission-or-mitigation-of-forfeitures--10cf8bc9f9.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 8a7b0528d41104246ff9a598a736f426ed204085c0af1ad28869c9580e4f0b91
Source location: USCODE-2024-title18-partII-chap232-sec3668.pdf
Stored source content
Page 873
TITLE 18—CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
§ 3669
Section consolidates sections 222 and 224 of title 27,
U.S.C., 1940 ed., with changes in phraseology and ar-
rangement necessary to effect the consolidation. Said
section 222 is also incorporated in section 1262 of this
title.
Definition of ‘‘State’’ in section 222 of title 27 U.S.C.,
1940 ed., as meaning and including ‘‘every State, Terri-
tory, and Possession of the United States,’’ was omit-
ted because the words ‘‘Territory, District,’’ and so
forth, appear after ‘‘State’’ in sections 1262, 1265, of this
title, which are the only sections in chapter 59, consti-
tuting sections 1261–1265 of this title, to which such def-
inition would have been applicable.
Changes made in phraseology.
§ 3668. Remission or mitigation of forfeitures
under liquor laws; possession pending trial
(a) JURISDICTION OF COURT
Whenever, in any proceeding in court for the
forfeiture, under the internal-revenue laws, of
any vehicle or aircraft seized for a violation of
the internal-revenue laws relating to liquors,
such forfeiture is decreed, the court shall have
exclusive jurisdiction to remit or mitigate the
forfeiture.
(b) CONDITIONS
PRECEDENT
TO
REMISSION
OR
MITIGATION
In any such proceeding the court shall not
allow the claim of any claimant for remission or
mitigation unless and until he proves (1) that he
has an interest in such vehicle or aircraft, as
owner or otherwise, which he acquired in good
faith, (2) that he had at no time any knowledge
or reason to believe that it was being or would
be used in the violation of laws of the United
States or of any State relating to liquor, and (3)
if it appears that the interest asserted by the
claimant arises out of or is in any way subject
to any contract or agreement under which any
person having a record or reputation for vio-
lating laws of the United States or of any State
relating to liquor has a right with respect to
such vehicle or aircraft, that, before such claim-
ant acquired his interest, or such other person
acquired his right under such contract or agree-
ment, whichever occurred later, the claimant,
his officer or agent, was informed in answer to
his inquiry, at the headquarters of the sheriff,
chief of police, principal Federal internal-rev-
enue officer engaged in the enforcement of the
liquor laws, or other principal local or Federal
law-enforcement officer of the locality in which
such other person acquired his right under such
contract or agreement, of the locality in which
such other person then resided, and of each lo-
cality in which the claimant has made any other
inquiry as to the character or financial standing
of such other person, that such other person had
no such record or reputation.
(c) CLAIMANTS FIRST ENTITLED TO DELIVERY
Upon the request of any claimant whose claim
for remission or mitigation is allowed and whose
interest is first in the order of priority among
such claims allowed in such proceeding and is of
an amount in excess of, or equal to, the ap-
praised value of such vehicle or aircraft, the
court shall order its return to him; and, upon
the joint request of any two or more claimants
whose claims are allowed and whose interests
are not subject to any prior or intervening inter-
ests claimed and allowed in such proceedings,
and are of a total amount in excess of, or equal
to, the appraised value of such vehicle or air-
craft, the court shall order its return to such of
the joint requesting claimants as is designated
in such request. Such return shall be made only
upon payment of all expenses incident to the
seizure and forfeiture incurred by the United
States. In all other cases the court shall order
disposition of such vehicle or aircraft as pro-
vided in section 1306 of title 40, and if such dis-
position be by public sale, payment from the
proceeds thereof, after satisfaction of all such
expenses, of any such claim in its order of pri-
ority among the claims allowed in such pro-
ceedings.
(d) DELIVERY ON BOND PENDING TRIAL
In any proceeding in court for the forfeiture
under the internal-revenue laws of any vehicle
or aircraft seized for a violation of the internal-
revenue laws relating to liquor, the court shall
order delivery thereof to any claimant who shall
establish his right to the immediate possession
thereof, and shall execute, with one or more
sureties approved by the court, and deliver to
the court, a bond to the United States for the
payment of a sum equal to the appraised value
of such vehicle or aircraft. Such bond shall be
conditioned to return such vehicle or aircraft at
the time of the trial and to pay the difference
between the appraised value of such vehicle or
aircraft as of the time it shall have been so re-
leased on bond and the appraised value thereof
as of the time of trial; and conditioned further
that, if the vehicle or aircraft be not returned at
the time of trial, the bond shall stand in lieu of,
and be forfeited in the same manner as, such ve-
hicle or aircraft. Notwithstanding this sub-
section or any other provisions of law relating
to the delivery of possession on bond of vehicles
or aircraft sought to be forfeited under the in-
ternal-revenue laws, the court may, in its dis-
cretion and upon good cause shown by the
United States, refuse to order such delivery of
possession.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 840, § 3617; renum-
bered § 3668, Pub. L. 98–473, title II, § 212(a)(1),
Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 1987; amended Pub. L.
107–217, § 3(d), Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1299.)
HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES
Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., § 646 (Aug. 27, 1935,
ch. 740, § 204, 49 Stat. 878).
A minor change was made in phraseology.
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
2002—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 107–217 substituted ‘‘section
1306 of title 40’’ for ‘‘sections 304f–304m of Title 40’’.
§ 3669. Conveyances carrying liquor
Any conveyance, whether used by the owner or
another in introducing or attempting to intro-
duce intoxicants into the Indian country, or into
other places where the introduction is prohib-
ited by treaty or enactment of Congress, shall
be subject to seizure, libel, and forfeiture.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 841, § 3618; renum-
bered § 3669, Pub. L. 98–473, title II, § 212(a)(1),
Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 1987.)
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Jurisdiction of court** Whenever, in any proceeding in court for the forfeiture, under the internal-revenue laws, of any vehicle or aircraft seized for a violation of the internal-revenue laws relating to liquors, such forfeiture is decreed, the court shall have exclusive jurisdiction to remit or mitigate the forfeiture.
**(b) Conditions precedent to remission or mitigation** In any such proceeding the court shall not allow the claim of any claimant for remission or mitigation unless and until he proves (1) that he has an interest in such vehicle or aircraft, as owner or otherwise, which he acquired in good faith, (2) that he had at no time any knowledge or reason to believe that it was being or would be used in the violation of laws of the United States or of any State relating to liquor, and (3) if it appears that the interest asserted by the claimant arises out of or is in any way subject to any contract or agreement under which any person having a record or reputation for violating laws of the United States or of any State relating to liquor has a right with respect to such vehicle or aircraft, that, before such claimant acquired his interest, or such other person acquired his right under such contract or agreement, whichever occurred later, the claimant, his officer or agent, was informed in answer to his inquiry, at the headquarters of the sheriff, chief of police, principal Federal internal-revenue officer engaged in the enforcement of the liquor laws, or other principal local or Federal law-enforcement officer of the locality in which such other person acquired his right under such contract or agreement, of the locality in which such other person then resided, and of each locality in which the claimant has made any other inquiry as to the character or fin
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 18 U.S.C. § 3668
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.