Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
47 U.S.C. § 548 — Development of competition and diversity
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 298
TITLE 47—TELECOMMUNICATIONS
§ 547
thority fails to object within a reasonable time after
receipt of such notice’’ for ‘‘or has effectively acqui-
esced’’.
Subsec. (e)(2)(A). Pub. L. 102–385, § 18(e), inserted
‘‘, other than harmless error,’’ after ‘‘franchising au-
thority’’.
Subsec. (i). Pub. L. 102–385, § 18(f), added subsec. (i).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1992 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 102–385 effective 60 days after
Oct. 5, 1992, see section 28 of Pub. L. 102–385, set out as
a note under section 325 of this title.
EFFECTIVE DATE
Section effective 60 days after Oct. 30, 1984, except
where otherwise expressly provided, see section 9(a) of
Pub. L. 98–549, set out as a note under section 521 of
this title.
§ 547. Conditions of sale
(a) If a renewal of a franchise held by a cable
operator is denied and the franchising authority
acquires ownership of the cable system or ef-
fects a transfer of ownership of the system to
another person, any such acquisition or transfer
shall be—
(1) at fair market value, determined on the
basis of the cable system valued as a going
concern but with no value allocated to the
franchise itself, or
(2) in the case of any franchise existing on
the effective date of this subchapter, at a price
determined in accordance with the franchise if
such franchise contains provisions applicable
to such an acquisition or transfer.
(b) If a franchise held by a cable operator is re-
voked for cause and the franchising authority
acquires ownership of the cable system or ef-
fects a transfer of ownership of the system to
another person, any such acquisition or transfer
shall be—
(1) at an equitable price, or
(2) in the case of any franchise existing on
the effective date of this sub
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 47 U.S.C. § 548
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: 92ccf2c2685aeec46b4dd8c712479e95c1d601a8a98f539d159c75ca32c90af5. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-d9f496a6dd66fec29c183358
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-47/section-548-development-of-competition-and-diversity--ea1dec0a20.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 3d8b01a22e8799f3e0d76b4c1eb4ef4c2cf8dc90e7951d4294bcaa46685b8242
Source location: USCODE-2024-title47-chap5-subchapV-A-partIII-sec548.pdf
Stored source content
Page 298
TITLE 47—TELECOMMUNICATIONS
§ 547
thority fails to object within a reasonable time after
receipt of such notice’’ for ‘‘or has effectively acqui-
esced’’.
Subsec. (e)(2)(A). Pub. L. 102–385, § 18(e), inserted
‘‘, other than harmless error,’’ after ‘‘franchising au-
thority’’.
Subsec. (i). Pub. L. 102–385, § 18(f), added subsec. (i).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1992 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 102–385 effective 60 days after
Oct. 5, 1992, see section 28 of Pub. L. 102–385, set out as
a note under section 325 of this title.
EFFECTIVE DATE
Section effective 60 days after Oct. 30, 1984, except
where otherwise expressly provided, see section 9(a) of
Pub. L. 98–549, set out as a note under section 521 of
this title.
§ 547. Conditions of sale
(a) If a renewal of a franchise held by a cable
operator is denied and the franchising authority
acquires ownership of the cable system or ef-
fects a transfer of ownership of the system to
another person, any such acquisition or transfer
shall be—
(1) at fair market value, determined on the
basis of the cable system valued as a going
concern but with no value allocated to the
franchise itself, or
(2) in the case of any franchise existing on
the effective date of this subchapter, at a price
determined in accordance with the franchise if
such franchise contains provisions applicable
to such an acquisition or transfer.
(b) If a franchise held by a cable operator is re-
voked for cause and the franchising authority
acquires ownership of the cable system or ef-
fects a transfer of ownership of the system to
another person, any such acquisition or transfer
shall be—
(1) at an equitable price, or
(2) in the case of any franchise existing on
the effective date of this subchapter, at a price
determined in accordance with the franchise if
such franchise contains provisions applicable
to such an acquisition or transfer.
(June 19, 1934, ch. 652, title VI, § 627, as added
Pub. L. 98–549, § 2, Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 2793.)
Editorial Notes
REFERENCES IN TEXT
For ‘‘the effective date of this subchapter’’, referred
to in subsecs. (a)(2) and (b)(2), as 60 days after Oct. 30,
1984, except where otherwise expressly provided, see
section 9(a) of Pub. L. 98–549, set out as an Effective
Date note under section 521 of this title.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE
Section effective 60 days after Oct. 30, 1984, except
where otherwise expressly provided, see section 9(a) of
Pub. L. 98–549, set out as a note under section 521 of
this title.
§ 548. Development of competition and diversity
in video programming distribution
(a) Purpose
The purpose of this section is to promote the
public interest, convenience, and necessity by
increasing competition and diversity in the mul-
tichannel video programming market, to in-
crease the availability of satellite cable pro-
gramming and satellite broadcast programming
to persons in rural and other areas not currently
able to receive such programming, and to spur
the
development
of
communications
tech-
nologies.
(b) Prohibition
It shall be unlawful for a cable operator, a sat-
ellite cable programming vendor in which a
cable operator has an attributable interest, or a
satellite broadcast programming vendor to en-
gage in unfair methods of competition or unfair
or deceptive acts or practices, the purpose or ef-
fect of which is to hinder significantly or to pre-
vent any multichannel video programming dis-
tributor from providing satellite cable program-
ming or satellite broadcast programming to sub-
scribers or consumers.
(c) Regulations required
(1) Proceeding required
Within 180 days after October 5, 1992, the
Commission shall, in order to promote the
public interest, convenience, and necessity by
increasing competition and diversity in the
multichannel video programming market and
the continuing development of communica-
tions technologies, prescribe regulations to
specify particular conduct that is prohibited
by subsection (b).
(2) Minimum contents of regulations
The regulations to be promulgated under
this section shall—
(A) establish effective safeguards to pre-
vent a cable operator which has an attrib-
utable interest in a satellite cable program-
ming vendor or a satellite broadcast pro-
gramming vendor from unduly or improperly
influencing the decision of such vendor to
sell, or the prices, terms, and conditions of
sale of, satellite cable programming or sat-
ellite broadcast programming to any unaf-
filiated multichannel video programming
distributor;
(B) prohibit discrimination by a satellite
cable programming vendor in which a cable
operator has an attributable interest or by a
satellite broadcast programming vendor in
the prices, terms, and conditions of sale or
delivery of satellite cable programming or
satellite broadcast programming among or
between cable systems, cable operators, or
other multichannel video programming dis-
tributors, or their agents or buying groups;
except that such a satellite cable program-
ming vendor in which a cable operator has
an attributable interest or such a satellite
broadcast programming vendor shall not be
prohibited from—
(i) imposing reasonable requirements for
creditworthiness, offering of service, and
financial stability and standards regarding
character and technical quality;
(ii) establishing different prices, terms,
and conditions to take into account actual
and reasonable differences in the cost of
creation, sale, delivery, or transmission of
satellite cable programming or satellite
broadcast programming;
Page 299
TITLE 47—TELECOMMUNICATIONS
§ 548
(iii) establishing different prices, terms,
and conditions which take into account
economies of scale, cost savings, or other
direct and legitimate economic benefits
reasonably attributable to the number of
subscribers served by the distributor; or
(iv) entering into an exclusive contract
that is permitted under subparagraph (D);
(C) prohibit practices, understandings, ar-
rangements, and activities, including exclu-
sive contracts for satellite cable program-
ming or satellite broadcast programming be-
tween a cable operator and a satellite cable
programming vendor or satellite broadcast
programming vendor, that prevent a multi-
channel video programming distributor from
obtaining such programming from any sat-
ellite cable programming vendor in which a
cable operator has an attributable interest
or any satellite broadcast programming ven-
dor in which a cable operator has an attrib-
utable interest for distribution to persons in
areas not served by a cable operator as of
October 5, 1992; and
(D) with respect to distribution to persons
in areas served by a cable operator, prohibit
exclusive contracts for satellite cable pro-
gramming or satellite broadcast program-
ming between a cable operator and a sat-
ellite cable programming vendor in which a
cable operator has an attributable interest
or a satellite broadcast programming vendor
in which a cable operator has an attrib-
utable interest, unless the Commission de-
termines (in accordance with paragraph (4))
that such contract is in the public interest.
(3) Limitations
(A) Geographic limitations
Nothing in this section shall require any
person who is engaged in the national or re-
gional distribution of video programming to
make such programming available in any ge-
ographic area beyond which such program-
ming has been authorized or licensed for dis-
tribution.
(B) Applicability to satellite retransmissions
Nothing in this section shall apply (i) to
the signal of any broadcast affiliate of a na-
tional television network or other television
signal that is retransmitted by satellite but
that is not satellite broadcast programming,
or (ii) to any internal satellite communica-
tion of any broadcast network or cable net-
work that is not satellite broadcast pro-
gramming.
(4) Public interest determinations on exclusive
contracts
In determining whether an exclusive con-
tract is in the public interest for purposes of
paragraph (2)(D), the Commission shall con-
sider each of the following factors with respect
to the effect of such contract on the distribu-
tion of video programming in areas that are
served by a cable operator:
(A) the effect of such exclusive contract on
the development of competition in local and
national multichannel video programming
distribution markets;
(B) the effect of such exclusive contract on
competition from multichannel video pro-
gramming distribution technologies other
than cable;
(C) the effect of such exclusive contract on
the attraction of capital investment in the
production and distribution of new satellite
cable programming;
(D) the effect of such exclusive contract on
diversity of programming in the multi-
channel
video
programming
distribution
market; and
(E) the duration of the exclusive contract.
(5) Sunset provision
The prohibition required by paragraph (2)(D)
shall cease to be effective 10 years after Octo-
ber 5, 1992, unless the Commission finds, in a
proceeding conducted during the last year of
such 10-year period, that such prohibition con-
tinues to be necessary to preserve and protect
competition and diversity in the distribution
of video programming.
(d) Adjudicatory proceeding
Any multichannel video programming dis-
tributor aggrieved by conduct that it alleges
constitutes a violation of subsection (b), or the
regulations of the Commission under subsection
(c), may commence an adjudicatory proceeding
at the Commission.
(e) Remedies for violations
(1) Remedies authorized
Upon completion of such adjudicatory pro-
ceeding, the Commission shall have the power
to order appropriate remedies, including, if
necessary, the power to establish prices,
terms, and conditions of sale of programming
to the aggrieved multichannel video program-
ming distributor.
(2) Additional remedies
The remedies provided in paragraph (1) are
in addition to and not in lieu of the remedies
available under subchapter V or any other pro-
vision of this chapter.
(f) Procedures
The Commission shall prescribe regulations to
implement this section. The Commission’s regu-
lations shall—
(1) provide for an expedited review of any
complaints made pursuant to this section;
(2) establish procedures for the Commission
to collect such data, including the right to ob-
tain copies of all contracts and documents re-
flecting arrangements and understandings al-
leged to violate this section, as the Commis-
sion requires to carry out this section; and
(3) provide for penalties to be assessed
against any person filing a frivolous complaint
pursuant to this section.
(g) Common carriers
Any provision that applies to a cable operator
under this section shall apply to a common car-
rier or its affiliate that provides video program-
ming by any means directly to subscribers. Any
such provision that applies to a satellite cable
programming vendor in which a cable operator
has an attributable interest shall apply to any
satellite cable programming vendor in which
Page 300
TITLE 47—TELECOMMUNICATIONS
§ 549
such common carrier has an attributable inter-
est. For the purposes of this subsection, two or
fewer common officers or directors shall not by
itself establish an attributable interest by a
common carrier in a satellite cable program-
ming vendor (or its parent company).
(h) Exemptions for prior contracts
(1) In general
Nothing in this section shall affect any con-
tract that grants exclusive distribution rights
to any person with respect to satellite cable
programming and that was entered into on or
before June 1, 1990, except that the provisions
of subsection (c)(2)(C) shall apply for distribu-
tion to persons in areas not served by a cable
operator.
(2) Limitation on renewals
A contract that was entered into on or be-
fore June 1, 1990, but that is renewed or ex-
tended after October 5, 1992, shall not be ex-
empt under paragraph (1).
(i) Definitions
As used in this section:
(1) The term ‘‘satellite cable programming’’
has the meaning provided under section 605 of
this title, except that such term does not in-
clude satellite broadcast programming.
(2) The term ‘‘satellite cable programming
vendor’’ means a person engaged in the pro-
duction, creation, or wholesale distribution
for sale of satellite cable programming, but
does not include a satellite broadcast pro-
gramming vendor.
(3) The term ‘‘satellite broadcast program-
ming’’ means broadcast video programming
when such programming is retransmitted by
satellite and the entity retransmitting such
programming is not the broadcaster or an en-
tity performing such retransmission on behalf
of and with the specific consent of the broad-
caster.
(4) The term ‘‘satellite broadcast program-
ming vendor’’ means a fixed service satellite
carrier that provides service pursuant to sec-
tion 119 of title 17 with respect to satellite
broadcast programming.
(June 19, 1934, ch. 652, title VI, § 628, as added
Pub. L. 102–385, § 19, Oct. 5, 1992, 106 Stat. 1494;
amended Pub. L. 104–104, title III, § 301(h), Feb. 8,
1996, 110 Stat. 117; Pub. L. 115–141, div. P, title
IV, § 402(d), Mar. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 1089.)
Editorial Notes
REFERENCES IN TEXT
This chapter, referred to in subsec. (e)(2), was in the
original ‘‘this Act’’, meaning act June 19, 1934, ch. 652,
48 Stat. 1064, known as the Communications Act of 1934,
which is classified principally to this chapter. For com-
plete classification of this Act to the Code, see section
609 of this title and Tables.
AMENDMENTS
2018—Subsecs. (g), (j). Pub. L. 115–141 redesignated
subsec. (j) as (g), transferred subsec. (g) to appear after
subsec. (f), and struck out former subsec. (g). Prior to
amendment, text of subsec. (g) read as follows: ‘‘The
Commission shall, beginning not later than 18 months
after promulgation of the regulations required by sub-
section (c), annually report to Congress on the status of
competition in the market for the delivery of video
programming.’’
1996—Subsec. (j). Pub. L. 104–104 added subsec. (j).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE
Section effective 60 days after Oct. 5, 1992, see section
28 of Pub. L. 102–385, set out as an Effective Date of 1992
Amendment note under section 325 of this title.
§ 549. Competitive availability of navigation de-
vices
(a) Commercial consumer availability of equip-
ment used to access services provided by
multichannel video programming distribu-
tors
The Commission shall, in consultation with
appropriate industry standard-setting organiza-
tions, adopt regulations to assure the commer-
cial availability, to consumers of multichannel
video programming and other services offered
over multichannel video programming systems,
of converter boxes, interactive communications
equipment, and other equipment used by con-
sumers to access multichannel video program-
ming and other services offered over multi-
channel video programming systems, from man-
ufacturers, retailers, and other vendors not af-
filiated with any multichannel video program-
ming distributor. Such regulations shall not
prohibit any multichannel video programming
distributor from also offering converter boxes,
interactive communications equipment, and
other equipment used by consumers to access
multichannel video programming and other
services offered over multichannel video pro-
gramming systems, to consumers, if the system
operator’s charges to consumers for such devices
and equipment are separately stated and not
subsidized by charges for any such service.
(b) Protection of system security
The Commission shall not prescribe regula-
tions under subsection (a) which would jeop-
ardize security of multichannel video program-
ming and other services offered over multi-
channel video programming systems, or impede
the legal rights of a provider of such services to
prevent theft of service.
(c) Waiver
The Commission shall waive a regulation
adopted under subsection (a) for a limited time
upon an appropriate showing by a provider of
multichannel video programming and other
services offered over multichannel video pro-
gramming systems, or an equipment provider,
that such waiver is necessary to assist the devel-
opment or introduction of a new or improved
multichannel video programming or other serv-
ice offered over multichannel video program-
ming systems, technology, or products. Upon an
appropriate showing, the Commission shall
grant any such waiver request within 90 days of
any application filed under this subsection, and
such waiver shall be effective for all service pro-
viders and products in that category and for all
providers of services and products.
(d) Avoidance of redundant regulations
(1) Commercial availability determinations
Determinations made or regulations pre-
scribed by the Commission with respect to
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Purpose** The purpose of this section is to promote the public interest, convenience, and necessity by increasing competition and diversity in the multichannel video programming market, to increase the availability of satellite cable programming and satellite broadcast programming to persons in rural and other areas not currently able to receive such programming, and to spur the development of communications technologies.
**(b) Prohibition** It shall be unlawful for a cable operator, a satellite cable programming vendor in which a cable operator has an attributable interest, or a satellite broadcast programming vendor to engage in unfair methods of competition or unfair or deceptive acts or practices, the purpose or effect of which is to hinder significantly or to prevent any multichannel video programming distributor from providing satellite cable programming or satellite broadcast programming to subscribers or consumers.
**(c) Regulations required**
(1) **Proceeding required** — Within 180 days after October 5, 1992, the Commission shall, in order to promote the public interest, convenience, and necessity by increasing competition and diversity in the multichannel video programming market and the continuing development of communications technologies, prescribe regulations to specify particular conduct that is prohibited by subsection (b).
(2) **Minimum contents of regulations** — The regulations to be promulgated under this section shall—
(A) establish effective safeguards to prevent a cable operator which has an attributable interest in a satellite cable programming vendor or a satellite broadcast programming vendor from unduly or improperly influencing the decision of such vendor to sell, or the prices, terms, and conditions of sale of, satellite cable
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 47 U.S.C. § 548
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.