Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
10 U.S.C. § 619a — Eligibility for consideration for pro-
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 604
TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES
§ 619a
EFFECTIVE DATE
Section effective Sept. 15, 1981, but the authority to
prescribe regulations under this subchapter effective on
Dec. 12, 1980, see section 701 of Pub. L. 96–513, set out as
an Effective Date of 1980 Amendment note under sec-
tion 101 of this title.
TRANSITION PROVISIONS UNDER DEFENSE OFFICER
PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT ACT
For provisions to prevent extinction or premature
termination of rights, duties, penalties, or proceedings
that existed or were begun prior to the effective date of
Pub. L. 96–513 and otherwise to allow for an orderly
transition to the system of officer personnel manage-
ment put in place under Pub. L. 96–513, see section 601
et seq. of Pub. L. 96–513, set out as a note under section
611 of this title.
§ 619a. Eligibility for consideration for pro-
motion: designation as joint qualified officer
required before promotion to general or flag
grade; exceptions
(a) GENERAL RULE.—An officer on the active-
duty list of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine
Corps, or Space Force may not be appointed to
the grade of brigadier general or rear admiral
(lower half) unless the officer has been des-
ignated as a joint qualified officer in accordance
with section 661 of this title.
(b) EXCEPTIONS.—Subject to subsection (c), the
Secretary of Defense may waive subsection (a)
in the following circumstances:
(1) When necessary for the good of the serv-
ice.
(2) In the case of an officer whose proposed
selection for promotion is based primarily
upon scientific and technical qualifications for
which joint requirements do not exist.
(3) In the case of—
(A) a medical officer, dental officer, veteri-
nary officer, medical service officer, nurse,
or biomedical science officer;
(B) a chaplain; or
(C) a
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 10 U.S.C. § 619a
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: 082594227f56bf876e46ed40a373ea7b947a3a6da58edbb2173cb13a217e51ed. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-cf0f382c9b08054ba91038e4
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-10/section-619a-eligibility-for-consideration-for-pro--df5334dfc5.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 468c8363cfa41e4c3b8864c942a9acaf513f805641b732281e662a2343a95022
Source location: USCODE-2024-title10-subtitleA-partII-chap36-subchapII-sec619a.pdf
Stored source content
Page 604
TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES
§ 619a
EFFECTIVE DATE
Section effective Sept. 15, 1981, but the authority to
prescribe regulations under this subchapter effective on
Dec. 12, 1980, see section 701 of Pub. L. 96–513, set out as
an Effective Date of 1980 Amendment note under sec-
tion 101 of this title.
TRANSITION PROVISIONS UNDER DEFENSE OFFICER
PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT ACT
For provisions to prevent extinction or premature
termination of rights, duties, penalties, or proceedings
that existed or were begun prior to the effective date of
Pub. L. 96–513 and otherwise to allow for an orderly
transition to the system of officer personnel manage-
ment put in place under Pub. L. 96–513, see section 601
et seq. of Pub. L. 96–513, set out as a note under section
611 of this title.
§ 619a. Eligibility for consideration for pro-
motion: designation as joint qualified officer
required before promotion to general or flag
grade; exceptions
(a) GENERAL RULE.—An officer on the active-
duty list of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine
Corps, or Space Force may not be appointed to
the grade of brigadier general or rear admiral
(lower half) unless the officer has been des-
ignated as a joint qualified officer in accordance
with section 661 of this title.
(b) EXCEPTIONS.—Subject to subsection (c), the
Secretary of Defense may waive subsection (a)
in the following circumstances:
(1) When necessary for the good of the serv-
ice.
(2) In the case of an officer whose proposed
selection for promotion is based primarily
upon scientific and technical qualifications for
which joint requirements do not exist.
(3) In the case of—
(A) a medical officer, dental officer, veteri-
nary officer, medical service officer, nurse,
or biomedical science officer;
(B) a chaplain; or
(C) a judge advocate.
(4) In the case of an officer selected by a pro-
motion board for appointment to the grade of
brigadier general or rear admiral (lower half)
while serving in a joint duty assignment if the
officer’s total consecutive service in joint duty
assignments is not less than two years and the
officer has successfully completed a program
of education described in subsections (b) and
(c) of section 2155 of this title.
(5) In the case of an officer who served in a
joint duty assignment that began before Janu-
ary 1, 1987, if the officer served in that assign-
ment for a period of sufficient duration (which
may not be less than 12 months) for the offi-
cer’s service to have been considered a full
tour of duty under the policies and regulations
in effect on September 30, 1986.
(c) WAIVER TO BE INDIVIDUAL.—A waiver may
be granted under subsection (b) only on a case-
by-case basis in the case of an individual officer.
(d) SPECIAL
RULE
FOR
GOOD-OF-THE-SERVICE
WAIVER.—In the case of a waiver under sub-
section (b)(1), the Secretary shall provide that
the first duty assignment as a general or flag of-
ficer of the officer for whom the waiver is grant-
ed shall be in a joint duty assignment.
(e) LIMITATION ON DELEGATION OF WAIVER AU-
THORITY.—The authority of the Secretary of De-
fense to grant a waiver under subsection (b)
(other than under paragraph (1) of that sub-
section) may be delegated only to the Deputy
Secretary of Defense, an Under Secretary of De-
fense, or an Assistant Secretary of Defense.
(f) REGULATIONS.—The Secretary of Defense
shall prescribe regulations to carry out this sec-
tion. The regulations shall specifically identify
for purposes of subsection (b)(2) those categories
of officers for which selection for promotion to
brigadier general or, in the case of the Navy,
rear admiral (lower half) is based primarily upon
scientific and technical qualifications for which
joint requirements do not exist.
(g) LIMITATION FOR GENERAL AND FLAG OFFI-
CERS PREVIOUSLY RECEIVING JOINT DUTY ASSIGN-
MENT WAIVER.—A general officer or flag officer
who before January 1, 1999, received a waiver of
subsection (a) under the authority of this sub-
section (as in effect before that date) may not be
appointed to the grade of lieutenant general or
vice admiral until the officer completes a full
tour of duty in a joint duty assignment.
(Added Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title IX, § 931(a),
Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1732; amended Pub. L.
104–106, div. A, title XV, § 1502(a)(1), Feb. 10, 1996,
110 Stat. 502; Pub. L. 106–65, div. A, title V, § 508,
Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 591; Pub. L. 107–107, div. A,
title V, § 525(a), (b), Dec. 28, 2001, 115 Stat. 1099;
Pub. L. 108–375, div. A, title V, § 533, Oct. 28, 2004,
118 Stat. 1901; Pub. L. 110–417, [div. A], title V,
§ 521(a), (b)(1), Oct. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 4444; Pub. L.
116–283, div. A, title IX, § 924(b)(3)(F), Jan. 1, 2021,
134 Stat. 3821.)
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
2021—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 116–283 substituted ‘‘Marine
Corps, or Space Force’’ for ‘‘or Marine Corps’’.
2008—Pub. L. 110–417, § 521(b)(1), substituted ‘‘Eligi-
bility for consideration for promotion: designation as
joint qualified officer required before promotion to gen-
eral or flag grade; exceptions’’ for ‘‘Eligibility for con-
sideration for promotion: joint duty assignment re-
quired before promotion to general or flag grade; excep-
tions’’ in section catchline.
Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 110–417, § 521(a)(1), substituted
‘‘unless the officer has been designated as a joint quali-
fied officer’’ for ‘‘unless—
‘‘(1) the officer has completed a full tour of duty in
a joint duty assignment (as described in section 664(f)
of this title); and
‘‘(2) for appointments after September 30, 2008, the
officer has been selected for the joint specialty’’.
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 110–417, § 521(a)(2)(A), substituted
‘‘subsection (a)’’ for ‘‘paragraph (1) or paragraph (2) of
subsection (a), or both paragraphs (1) and (2) of sub-
section (a),’’ in introductory provisions.
Subsec. (b)(4). Pub. L. 110–417, § 521(a)(2)(B), sub-
stituted ‘‘is not less than two years and the officer has
successfully completed a program of education de-
scribed in subsections (b) and (c) of section 2155 of this
title’’ for ‘‘within that immediate organization is not
less than two years’’.
Subsec. (h). Pub. L. 110–417, § 521(a)(3), struck out
heading and text of subsec. (h). Text read as follows:
‘‘An officer of the Navy designated as a qualified nu-
clear propulsion officer who before January 1, 1997, is
appointed to the grade of rear admiral (lower half)
without regard to subsection (a) may not be appointed
to the grade of rear admiral until the officer completes
a full tour of duty in a joint duty assignment.’’
2004—Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 108–375, § 533(a), sub-
stituted ‘‘September 30, 2008’’ for ‘‘September 30, 2007’’.
Page 605
TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES
§ 620
Subsec. (b)(4). Pub. L. 108–375, § 533(b), substituted ‘‘if
the officer’s’’ for ‘‘if—
‘‘(A) at least 180 days of that joint duty assignment
have been completed on the date of the convening of
that selection board; and
‘‘(B) the officer’s’’.
2001—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 107–107, § 525(a), substituted
‘‘unless—’’ and pars. (1) and (2) for ‘‘unless the officer
has completed a full tour of duty in a joint duty assign-
ment (as described in section 664(f) of this title).’’
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 107–107, § 525(b), in introductory
provisions, substituted ‘‘may waive paragraph (1) or
paragraph (2) of subsection (a), or both paragraphs (1)
and (2) of subsection (a), in the following cir-
cumstances:’’ for ‘‘may waive subsection (a) in the fol-
lowing circumstances:’’.
1999—Subsec. (g). Pub. L. 106–65, § 508(a), amended
heading and text of subsec. (g) generally. Prior to
amendment, subsec. (g) authorized the Secretary until
Jan. 1, 1999, to waive subsecs. (a) and (d) for certain of-
ficers and contained restrictions on appointments of
those officers.
Subsec. (h). Pub. L. 106–65, § 508(b), substituted ‘‘An
officer of the Navy’’ for ‘‘(1) Until January 1, 1997, an
officer of the Navy’’ and ‘‘who before January 1, 1997,
is’’ for ‘‘may be’’ and struck out ‘‘. An officer so ap-
pointed’’ before ‘‘may not be appointed’’ and par. (2)
which read as follows: ‘‘Not later than March 1 of each
year from 1994 through 1997, the Secretary of Defense
shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of
the Senate and the Committee on National Security of
the House of Representatives a report on the implemen-
tation during the preceding calendar year of the transi-
tion plan developed by the Secretary pursuant to sec-
tion 1305(b) of Public Law 100–180 (10 U.S.C. 619a note)
with respect to service by qualified nuclear propulsion
officers in joint duty assignments.’’
1996—Subsec. (h)(2). Pub. L. 104–106 substituted ‘‘Com-
mittee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Com-
mittee on National Security of the House of Represent-
atives’’ for ‘‘Committees on Armed Services of the Sen-
ate and House of Representatives’’.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
PROPOSED LEGISLATIVE CHANGES
Pub. L. 107–107, div. A, title V, § 525(c), Dec. 28, 2001,
115 Stat. 1099, directed the Secretary of Defense to sub-
mit to Congress, not later than Dec. 1, 2002, a draft pro-
posal for such legislative changes to this section as the
Secretary considered were needed to implement the
amendment made to this section by section 525(a), (b)
of Pub. L. 107–107.
REPORT ON PLANS FOR COMPLIANCE
Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title IX, § 931(d), Nov. 30, 1993,
107 Stat. 1734, directed the Secretary of Defense to cer-
tify to Congress, not later than Feb. 1, 1994, that the
Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps had each de-
veloped and implemented a plan for officer personnel
assignment and promotion policies so as to ensure com-
pliance with the requirements of this section, and pro-
vided that each such plan should ensure that by Jan. 1,
1999, the service covered by the plan would have enough
officers who had completed a full tour of duty in a joint
duty assignment so as to permit the orderly promotion
of officers to brigadier general or, in the case of the
Navy, rear admiral (lower half).
PLAN FOR SERVICE BY QUALIFIED NUCLEAR PROPULSION
OFFICERS
IN JOINT DUTY ASSIGNMENTS
BY JANUARY
1, 1997; IMPLEMENTATION; REPORT
Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title IX, § 931(f)(2), Nov. 30,
1993, 107 Stat. 1734, as amended by Pub. L. 103–337, div.
A, title X, § 1070(b)(8)(A), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2857, di-
rected the Secretary of Defense to revise the transition
plan developed pursuant to Pub. L. 100–180, § 1305(b), for-
merly set out below, and to report on the revisions.
Pub. L. 100–456, div. A, title V, § 515(a)(3), Sept. 29,
1988, 102 Stat. 1970, directed the Secretary of Defense to
revise the transition plan developed pursuant to Pub.
L. 100–180, § 1305(b), formerly set out below, and to re-
port on the revisions.
Pub. L. 100–180, div. A, title XIII, § 1305(b)–(d), Dec. 4,
1987, 101 Stat. 1173, 1174, as amended by Pub. L. 100–456,
div. A, title V, § 515(a)(2), Sept. 29, 1988, 102 Stat. 1970;
Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title IX, § 931(f)(1), (3), Nov. 30,
1993, 107 Stat. 1734; Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title X,
§ 1070(b)(8), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2857, directed the Sec-
retary of Defense to develop and carry out a transition
plan, to be implemented no later than six months after
Dec. 4, 1987, for ensuring that during the period before
Jan. 1, 1997, the maximum practicable number of offi-
cers of the Navy who were qualified nuclear propulsion
officers had served in joint duty assignments and that
by Jan. 1, 1997, the maximum practicable number of
qualified nuclear propulsion officers in the grade of
captain had qualified for appointment to the grade of
rear admiral (lower half) by completing a full tour of
duty in a joint duty assignment, and directed the Sec-
retary to submit to committees of Congress on the date
on which the plan was implemented a copy of the plan
and a report explaining how the plan had fulfilled ob-
jectives.
§ 620. Active-duty lists
(a) The Secretary of the military department
concerned shall maintain a single list of all offi-
cers (other than officers described in section 641
of this title) who are on active duty for each
armed force under his jurisdiction (other than
the Coast Guard when it is operating as a serv-
ice in the Navy).
(b) Officers shall be carried on the active-duty
list of the armed force of which they are mem-
bers in the order of seniority of the grade in
which they are serving on active duty. Officers
serving in the same grade shall be carried in the
order of their rank in that grade.
(c) An officer whose position on the active-
duty list results from service under a temporary
appointment or in a grade held by reason of as-
signment to a position has, when that appoint-
ment or assignment ends, the grade and position
on the active-duty list that he would have held
if he had not received that appointment or as-
signment.
(d) Under regulations prescribed by the Sec-
retary of the military department concerned, a
reserve officer who is ordered to active duty
(whether voluntarily or involuntarily) during a
war or national emergency and who would oth-
erwise be placed on the active-duty list may be
excluded from that list as determined by the
Secretary concerned. Exclusion of an officer
from the active-duty list as the result of action
by the Secretary concerned under the preceding
sentence shall expire not later than 24 months
after the date on which the officer enters active
duty under an order to active duty covered by
that sentence.
(Added Pub. L. 96–513, title I, § 105, Dec. 12, 1980,
94 Stat. 2855; amended Pub. L. 103–337, div. A,
title XVI, § 1624, Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2961; Pub.
L. 104–106, div. A, title XV, § 1501(a)(1), Feb. 10,
1996, 110 Stat. 495.)
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
1996—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 104–106 made technical
amendment to Pub. L. 103–337, § 1624. See 1994 Amend-
ment note below.
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) General Rule.—** An officer on the active-duty list of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, or Space Force may not be appointed to the grade of brigadier general or rear admiral (lower half) unless the officer has been designated as a joint qualified officer in accordance with [section 661 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title10-section661&num=0&edition=prelim).
**(b) Exceptions.—** Subject to subsection (c), the Secretary of Defense may waive subsection (a) in the following circumstances:
(1) When necessary for the good of the service.
(2) In the case of an officer whose proposed selection for promotion is based primarily upon scientific and technical qualifications for which joint requirements do not exist.
(3) In the case of—
(A) a medical officer, dental officer, veterinary officer, medical service officer, nurse, or biomedical science officer;
(B) a chaplain; or
(C) a judge advocate.
(4) In the case of an officer selected by a promotion board for appointment to the grade of brigadier general or rear admiral (lower half) while serving in a joint duty assignment if the officer’s total consecutive service in joint duty assignments is not less than two years and the officer has successfully completed a program of education described in subsections (b) and (c) of [section 2155 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title10-section2155&num=0&edition=prelim).
(5) In the case of an officer who served in a joint duty assignment that began before January 1, 1987, if the officer served in that assignment for a period of sufficient duration (which may not be less than 12 months) for the officer’s service to have been considered a full tour of duty under the policies and re
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 619a
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.