Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
50 U.S.C. § 3102 — Critical cost growth in major systems
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 683
TITLE 50—WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE
§ 3102
this section and provisions set out as a note under this
section], section 324 [enacting section 3102 of this title],
or an amendment made by this section or section 324,
shall be construed to exempt an acquisition program of
the Department of Defense from the requirements of
[former] chapter 144 of title 10, United States Code [see
chapters 321, 324, and 325, subchapter I of chapter 322,
and sections 3042, 4232, 4273, 4293, 4321, 4323, and 4328 of
title 10][,] or Department of Defense Directive 5000, to
the extent that such requirements are otherwise appli-
cable.’’
§ 3102. Critical cost growth in major systems
(a) Reassessment of major system
If the Director of National Intelligence deter-
mines under section 3101(d) of this title that the
total acquisition cost of a major system has in-
creased by a percentage equal to or greater than
the critical cost growth threshold for the major
system, the Director shall—
(1) determine the root cause or causes of the
critical cost growth, in accordance with appli-
cable statutory requirements, policies, proce-
dures, and guidance; and
(2) carry out an assessment of—
(A) the projected cost of completing the
major system if current requirements are
not modified;
(B) the projected cost of completing the
major system based on reasonable modifica-
tion of such requirements;
(C) the rough order of magnitude of the
costs of any reasonable alternative system
or capability; and
(D) the need to reduce funding for other
systems due to the growth in cost of the
major system.
(b) Presumption of termination
(1) After conducting the reassessment required
by subsection (a) with respect to a major sys-
tem, the Director shall terminate the major sys-
tem unless the Di
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 50 U.S.C. § 3102
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: 799157e47360682c23c9e90a69150399ba991aa681936a0f7a3a103982038f07. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-cd4d3bd8075d78e551a3292d
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-50/section-3102-critical-cost-growth-in-major-systems--8fb2e7787a.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 3d921e444c488de0a7152ea84882b1059d65e0bd1412a075da422ff906d0f104
Source location: USCODE-2024-title50-chap44-subchapIII-sec3102.pdf
Stored source content
Page 683
TITLE 50—WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE
§ 3102
this section and provisions set out as a note under this
section], section 324 [enacting section 3102 of this title],
or an amendment made by this section or section 324,
shall be construed to exempt an acquisition program of
the Department of Defense from the requirements of
[former] chapter 144 of title 10, United States Code [see
chapters 321, 324, and 325, subchapter I of chapter 322,
and sections 3042, 4232, 4273, 4293, 4321, 4323, and 4328 of
title 10][,] or Department of Defense Directive 5000, to
the extent that such requirements are otherwise appli-
cable.’’
§ 3102. Critical cost growth in major systems
(a) Reassessment of major system
If the Director of National Intelligence deter-
mines under section 3101(d) of this title that the
total acquisition cost of a major system has in-
creased by a percentage equal to or greater than
the critical cost growth threshold for the major
system, the Director shall—
(1) determine the root cause or causes of the
critical cost growth, in accordance with appli-
cable statutory requirements, policies, proce-
dures, and guidance; and
(2) carry out an assessment of—
(A) the projected cost of completing the
major system if current requirements are
not modified;
(B) the projected cost of completing the
major system based on reasonable modifica-
tion of such requirements;
(C) the rough order of magnitude of the
costs of any reasonable alternative system
or capability; and
(D) the need to reduce funding for other
systems due to the growth in cost of the
major system.
(b) Presumption of termination
(1) After conducting the reassessment required
by subsection (a) with respect to a major sys-
tem, the Director shall terminate the major sys-
tem unless the Director submits to Congress a
Major System Congressional Report containing
a certification in accordance with paragraph (2)
and the information described in paragraph (3).
The Director shall submit such Major System
Congressional Report and certification not later
than 90 days after the date the Director receives
the relevant major system cost report under
subsection (b) or (c) of section 3101 of this title.
(2) A certification described by this paragraph
with respect to a major system is a written cer-
tification that—
(A) the continuation of the major system is
essential to the national security;
(B) there are no alternatives to the major
system that will provide acceptable capability
to meet the intelligence requirement at less
cost;
(C) the new estimates of the total acquisi-
tion cost have been determined by the Direc-
tor to be reasonable;
(D) the major system is a higher priority
than other systems whose funding must be re-
duced to accommodate the growth in cost of
the major system; and
(E) the management structure for the major
system is adequate to manage and control the
total acquisition cost.
(3) A Major System Congressional Report ac-
companying a written certification under para-
graph (2) shall include, in addition to the re-
quirements of section 3101(e) of this title, the
root cause analysis and assessment carried out
pursuant to subsection (a), the basis for each de-
termination made in accordance with subpara-
graphs (A) through (E) of paragraph (2), and a
description of all funding changes made as a re-
sult of the growth in the cost of the major sys-
tem, including reductions made in funding for
other
systems
to
accommodate
such
cost
growth, together with supporting documenta-
tion.
(c) Actions if major system not terminated
If the Director elects not to terminate a major
system pursuant to subsection (b), the Director
shall—
(1) restructure the major system in a man-
ner that addresses the root cause or causes of
the critical cost growth, as identified pursuant
to subsection (a), and ensures that the system
has an appropriate management structure as
set forth in the certification submitted pursu-
ant to subsection (b)(2)(E);
(2) rescind the most recent Milestone ap-
proval for the major system;
(3) require a new Milestone approval for the
major system before taking any action to
enter a new contract, exercise an option under
an existing contract, or otherwise extend the
scope of an existing contract under the sys-
tem, except to the extent determined nec-
essary by the Milestone Decision Authority,
on a nondelegable basis, to ensure that the
system may be restructured as intended by the
Director without unnecessarily wasting re-
sources;
(4) establish a revised current Baseline Esti-
mate for the major system based upon an up-
dated cost estimate; and
(5) conduct regular reviews of the major sys-
tem.
(d) Actions if major system terminated
If a major system is terminated pursuant to
subsection (b), the Director shall submit to Con-
gress a written report setting forth—
(1) an explanation of the reasons for termi-
nating the major system;
(2) the alternatives considered to address
any problems in the major system; and
(3) the course the Director plans to pursue to
meet any intelligence requirements otherwise
intended to be met by the major system.
(e) Form of report
Any report or certification required to be sub-
mitted under this section may be submitted in a
classified form.
(f) Waiver
(1) The Director may waive the requirements
of subsections (d)(2), (e), and (g) of section 3101
of this title and subsections (a)(2), (b), (c), and
(d) of this section with respect to a major sys-
tem if the Director determines that at least 90
percent of the amount of the current Baseline
Estimate for the major system has been ex-
pended.
(2)(A) If the Director grants a waiver under
paragraph (1) with respect to a major system,
the Director shall submit to the congressional
Page 684
TITLE 50—WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE
§ 3103
intelligence committees written notice of the
waiver that includes—
(i) the information described in section
3101(f) of this title; and
(ii) if the current total acquisition cost of
the major system has increased by a percent-
age equal to or greater than the critical cost
growth threshold—
(I) a determination of the root cause or
causes of the critical cost growth, as de-
scribed in subsection (a)(1); and
(II) a certification that includes the ele-
ments described in subparagraphs (A), (B),
and (E) of subsection (b)(2).
(B) The Director shall submit the written no-
tice required by subparagraph (A) not later than
90 days after the date that the Director receives
a major system cost report under subsection (b)
or (c) of section 3101 of this title that indicates
that the total acquisition cost for the major sys-
tem has increased by a percentage equal to or
greater than the significant cost growth thresh-
old or critical cost growth threshold.
(g) Definitions
In this section, the terms ‘‘cost estimate’’,
‘‘critical cost growth threshold’’, ‘‘current Base-
line Estimate’’, ‘‘major system’’, and ‘‘total ac-
quisition cost’’ have the meaning given those
terms in section 3101(a) of this title.
(July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title V, § 506F, as added
Pub. L. 111–259, title III, § 324(a), Oct. 7, 2010, 124
Stat. 2679.)
Editorial Notes
CODIFICATION
Section was formerly classified to section 415a–8 of
this title prior to editorial reclassification and renum-
bering as this section.
§ 3103. Future budget projections
(a) Future Year Intelligence Plans
(1) The Director of National Intelligence, with
the concurrence of the Director of the Office of
Management and Budget, shall provide to the
congressional intelligence committees a Future
Year Intelligence Plan, as described in para-
graph (2), for—
(A) each expenditure center in the National
Intelligence Program; and
(B) each major system in the National Intel-
ligence Program.
(2)(A) A Future Year Intelligence Plan sub-
mitted under this subsection shall include the
year-by-year proposed funding for each center or
system referred to in subparagraph (A) or (B) of
paragraph (1), for the budget year for which the
Plan is submitted and not less than the 4 subse-
quent fiscal years.
(B) A Future Year Intelligence Plan submitted
under subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1) for a
major system shall include—
(i) the estimated total life-cycle cost of such
major system; and
(ii) major milestones that have significant
resource implications for such major system.
(b) Long-term Budget Projections
(1) The Director of National Intelligence, with
the concurrence of the Director of the Office of
Management and Budget, shall provide to the
congressional intelligence committees a Long-
term Budget Projection for each element of the
intelligence community funded under the Na-
tional Intelligence Program acquiring a major
system that includes the budget for such ele-
ment for the 5-year period that begins on the
day after the end of the last fiscal year for
which year-by-year proposed funding is included
in a Future Year Intelligence Plan for such
major system in accordance with subsection
(a)(2)(A).
(2) A Long-term Budget Projection submitted
under paragraph (1) shall include—
(A) projections for the appropriate element
of the intelligence community for—
(i) pay and benefits of officers and employ-
ees of such element;
(ii) other operating and support costs and
minor acquisitions of such element;
(iii) research and technology required by
such element;
(iv) current and planned major system ac-
quisitions for such element;
(v) any future major system acquisitions
for such element; and
(vi) any additional funding projections
that the Director of National Intelligence
considers appropriate;
(B) a budget projection based on effective
cost and schedule execution of current or
planned major system acquisitions and appli-
cation of Office of Management and Budget in-
flation estimates to future major system ac-
quisitions;
(C) any additional assumptions and projec-
tions that the Director of National Intel-
ligence considers appropriate; and
(D) a description of whether, and to what ex-
tent, the total projection for each year ex-
ceeds the level that would result from apply-
ing the most recent Office of Management and
Budget inflation estimate to the budget of
that element of the intelligence community.
(c) Submission to Congress
The Director of National Intelligence, with
the concurrence of the Director of the Office of
Management and Budget, shall submit to the
congressional intelligence committees each Fu-
ture Year Intelligence Plan or Long-term Budg-
et Projection required under subsection (a) or
(b) for a fiscal year at the time that the Presi-
dent submits to Congress the budget for such fis-
cal year pursuant to section 1105 of title 31.
(d) Major system affordability report
(1) The Director of National Intelligence, with
the concurrence of the Director of the Office of
Management and Budget, shall prepare a report
on the acquisition of a major system funded
under the National Intelligence Program before
the time that the President submits to Congress
the budget for the first fiscal year in which ap-
propriated funds are anticipated to be obligated
for the development or procurement of such
major system.
(2) The report on such major system shall in-
clude an assessment of whether, and to what ex-
tent, such acquisition, if developed, procured,
and operated, is projected to cause an increase
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) In general** The budget justification materials submitted to Congress in support of the budget of the President for a fiscal year that is submitted to Congress under [section 1105(a) of title 31](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title31-section1105/a&num=0&edition=prelim) shall set forth separately the aggregate amount requested for that fiscal year for the National Intelligence Program for each of the following:
(1) Counterterrorism.
(2) Counterproliferation.
(3) Counternarcotics.
(4) Counterintelligence.
**(b) Election of classified or unclassified form** Amounts set forth under subsection (a) may be set forth in unclassified form or classified form, at the election of the Director of National Intelligence.
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 50 U.S.C. § 3102
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.