Arkansas Legal Resource Navigator

33 U.S.C. § 426i — Shore damage prevention or mitigation

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

33 U.S.C. § 426i — Shore damage prevention or mitigation

Page 70 TITLE 33—NAVIGATION AND NAVIGABLE WATERS § 426g–1 ‘‘(b) PROJECT SELECTION.—In carrying out the pilot program under subsection (a), the Secretary shall con- sult with relevant State agencies in selecting projects. ‘‘(c) CRITERIA.—In carrying out the pilot program under subsection (a), the Secretary shall establish cri- teria and other considerations that— ‘‘(1) foster Federal, State, and local collaboration; ‘‘(2) evaluate the performance of projects being car- ried out under a single contract with respect to whether such projects yield any regional or multi-dis- trict benefits; and ‘‘(3) include other criteria and considerations that the Secretary determines to be appropriate. ‘‘(d) REPORT.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 23, 2018], and annually thereafter, the Secretary shall submit to the Com- mittee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastruc- ture of the House of Representatives a report that in- cludes findings and recommendations of the Secretary with respect to the projects completed under the pilot program carried out under subsection (a). ‘‘(e) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is au- thorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $75,000,000. ‘‘(f) TERMINATION.—The authority of the Secretary to enter into contracts pursuant to the pilot program car- ried out under subsection (a) shall expire on the date that is 10 years after the date of enactment of this Act.’’ § 426g–1. State and regional plans The Secretary may— (1) cooperate with any State in the prepara- tion of a comprehensive State or regional plan for the conservation of coastal resources lo- cated within the boundaries of the State; (2) encourage State participation in the

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 33 U.S.C. § 426i

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.

Original supplied file — preserved unchanged

Download original Markdown file

File SHA-256: c33da0ef34d4e8e8cd3dbb856519cda8a4a5e16de4c75debdfa746b979bf0845. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.

Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.

Open the recorded source website ↗

Record provenance

Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-cb0e8218ed1047dc2ef3fb69
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-33/section-426i-shore-damage-prevention-or-mitigation--783c1f5997.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 3618de67b6ea33802bebe1ff8c74b988cefb066b4db97dbd0e1abea31efda972

Source location: USCODE-2024-title33-chap9-subchapI-sec426i.pdf

Stored source content

Page 70 TITLE 33—NAVIGATION AND NAVIGABLE WATERS § 426g–1 ‘‘(b) PROJECT SELECTION.—In carrying out the pilot program under subsection (a), the Secretary shall con- sult with relevant State agencies in selecting projects. ‘‘(c) CRITERIA.—In carrying out the pilot program under subsection (a), the Secretary shall establish cri- teria and other considerations that— ‘‘(1) foster Federal, State, and local collaboration; ‘‘(2) evaluate the performance of projects being car- ried out under a single contract with respect to whether such projects yield any regional or multi-dis- trict benefits; and ‘‘(3) include other criteria and considerations that the Secretary determines to be appropriate. ‘‘(d) REPORT.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 23, 2018], and annually thereafter, the Secretary shall submit to the Com- mittee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastruc- ture of the House of Representatives a report that in- cludes findings and recommendations of the Secretary with respect to the projects completed under the pilot program carried out under subsection (a). ‘‘(e) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is au- thorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $75,000,000. ‘‘(f) TERMINATION.—The authority of the Secretary to enter into contracts pursuant to the pilot program car- ried out under subsection (a) shall expire on the date that is 10 years after the date of enactment of this Act.’’ § 426g–1. State and regional plans The Secretary may— (1) cooperate with any State in the prepara- tion of a comprehensive State or regional plan for the conservation of coastal resources lo- cated within the boundaries of the State; (2) encourage State participation in the im- plementation of the plan; and (3) submit to Congress reports and rec- ommendations with respect to appropriate Federal participation in carrying out the plan. (Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 960, § 4, as added Pub. L. 104–303, title II, § 227(d)(2), Oct. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 3700.) Editorial Notes PRIOR PROVISIONS A prior section 4 of act Aug. 13, 1946, was renumbered section 5 of that act, and was classified to section 426h of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 104–303. § 426h. Repealed. Pub. L. 110–114, title II, § 2038(b), Nov. 8, 2007, 121 Stat. 1100 Section, act Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 960, § 5, as added Pub. L. 104–303, title II, § 227(e)(1), Oct. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 3700; amended Pub. L. 106–53, title V, § 581, Aug. 17, 1999, 113 Stat. 375; Pub. L. 109–234, title II, § 2305, June 15, 2006, 120 Stat. 456; Pub. L. 110–161, div. C, title I, § 113, Dec. 26, 2007, 121 Stat. 1944, related to national shoreline ero- sion control development and demonstration program. A prior section 426h, acts Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 960, § 5, for- merly § 4, 60 Stat. 1057; July 28, 1956, ch. 768, 70 Stat. 703; renumbered § 5, Oct. 12, 1996, Pub. L. 104–303, title II, § 227(d)(1), 110 Stat. 3700, defined the word ‘‘shores’’ as used in sections 426e to 426h of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 104–303, title II, § 227(e)(1), Oct. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 3700. § 426h–1. Definitions In sections 426e and 426f to 426h–1 of this title, the following definitions apply: (1) Erosion control program The term ‘‘erosion control program’’ means the national shoreline erosion control develop- ment and demonstration program established under this section. (2) Secretary The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means the Secretary of the Army. (3) Separable element The term ‘‘separable element’’ has the meaning provided by section 2213(f) of this title. (4) Shore The term ‘‘shore’’ includes each shoreline of the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, the Gulf of Mexico, the Great Lakes, and lakes, estuaries, and bays directly connected therewith. (5) Shore protection project The term ‘‘shore protection project’’ in- cludes a project for beach nourishment, in- cluding the replacement of sand. (Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 960, § 6, as added Pub. L. 104–303, title II, § 227(e)(1), Oct. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 3702.) § 426i. Shore damage prevention or mitigation (a) In general The Secretary of the Army is authorized to in- vestigate, study, plan, and implement structural and nonstructural measures for the prevention or mitigation of shore damages attributable to Federal navigation works and shore damage at- tributable to the Atlantic Intracoastal Water- way and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, if a non-Federal public body agrees to operate and maintain such measures, and, in the case of in- terests in real property acquired in conjunction with nonstructural measures, to operate and maintain the property for public purposes in ac- cordance with regulations prescribed by the Sec- retary. (b) Cost sharing The costs of implementing measures, includ- ing a study, shall be cost-shared in the same proportion as the cost-sharing provisions appli- cable to construction of the project causing the shore damage. (c) Requirement for specific authorization No such project shall be initiated without spe- cific authorization by Congress if the Federal first cost exceeds $15,000,000. (d) Coordination The Secretary shall— (1) coordinate the implementation of the measures under this section with other Fed- eral and non-Federal shore protection projects in the same geographic area; and (2) to the extent practicable, combine miti- gation projects with other shore protection projects in the same area into a comprehen- sive regional project. (e) Reimbursement for feasibility studies Beginning on December 16, 2016, in any case in which the Secretary implements a project under this section, the Secretary shall reimburse or credit the non-Federal interest for any amounts contributed for the study evaluating the damage in excess of the non-Federal share of the costs, as determined under subsection (b). Page 71 TITLE 33—NAVIGATION AND NAVIGABLE WATERS § 426k (Pub. L. 90–483, title I, § 111, Aug. 13, 1968, 82 Stat. 735; Pub. L. 99–662, title IX, §§ 915(f), 940, Nov. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 4191, 4199; Pub. L. 106–53, title II, § 214, Aug. 17, 1999, 113 Stat. 291; Pub. L. 113–121, title I, § 1030(c), June 10, 2014, 128 Stat. 1232; Pub. L. 114–322, title I, § 1169, Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1671; Pub. L. 115–270, title I, § 1157(c), Oct. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 3794; Pub. L. 118–272, div. A, title I, § 1107(h), Jan. 4, 2025, 138 Stat. 3005.) Editorial Notes AMENDMENTS 2025—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 118–272 substituted ‘‘$15,000,000’’ for ‘‘$12,500,000’’. 2018—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 115–270 substituted ‘‘$12,500,000’’ for ‘‘$10,000,000’’. 2016—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 114–322, § 1169(1), substituted ‘‘measures, including a study, shall be cost-shared in the same proportion as the cost-sharing provisions ap- plicable to construction of the project’’ for ‘‘measures under this section shall be cost-shared in the same pro- portion as the cost-sharing provisions applicable to the project’’. Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 114–322, § 1169(2), added subsec. (e). 2014—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 113–121 substituted ‘‘$10,000,000’’ for ‘‘$5,000,000’’. 1999—Pub. L. 106–53 designated first sentence as sub- sec. (a), inserted heading, and inserted ‘‘and shore dam- age attributable to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway’’ after ‘‘navigation works’’, designated second sentence as subsec. (b) and inserted heading, and designated third sentence as sub- sec. (c), inserted heading, and substituted ‘‘$5,000,000’’ for ‘‘$2,000,000’’, and added subsec. (d). 1986—Pub. L. 99–662, § 940, amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section read as follows: ‘‘The Sec- retary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engi- neers, is authorized to investigate, study, and con- struct projects for the prevention or mitigation of shore damages attributable to Federal navigation works. The cost of installing, operating, and maintain- ing such projects shall be borne entirely by the United States. No such project shall be constructed without specific authorization by Congress if the estimated first cost exceeds $2,000,000.’’ Pub. L. 99–662, § 915(f), substituted ‘‘$2,000,000’’ for ‘‘$1,000,000’’. Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1986 AMENDMENT Amendment by section 915(f) of Pub. L. 99–662 not ap- plicable to any project under contract for construction on Nov. 17, 1986, see section 915(i) of Pub. L. 99–662, set out as a note under section 426g of this title. COASTAL EROSION Pub. L. 115–270, title I, § 1172, Oct. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 3799, provided that: ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Pursuant to section 111 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (33 U.S.C. 426i), the Sec- retary [of the Army] shall, to the maximum extent practicable, complete operation and maintenance re- nourishment to mitigate coastal erosion attributed to Federal project structures in the upper northeast United States. ‘‘(b) PROJECT SELECTION.—In carrying out the work under subsection (a), the Secretary shall— ‘‘(1) identify and carry out not more than five projects— ‘‘(A) located in any of the States of Maine, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Is- land, or New York; and ‘‘(B) for which a feasibility study has been com- pleted by December 31, 2019, that includes findings that a Federal project structure is interrupting the natural flow of sediment and causing coastal ero- sion; and ‘‘(2) consult with relevant State agencies in select- ing projects.’’ § 426i–1. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–121, title I, § 1014(c)(2), June 10, 2014, 128 Stat. 1222 Section, Pub. L. 102–580, title II, § 206, Oct. 31, 1992, 106 Stat. 4828; Pub. L. 104–303, title II, § 227(c)(2), Oct. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 3700, related to construction of shoreline protection projects by non-Federal interests. § 426i–2. National coastal data bank (1) Establishment of data bank Not later than 2 years after August 17, 1999, the Secretary shall establish a national coastal data bank containing data on the geophysical and climatological characteristics of the shores of the United States. (2) Content To the extent practicable, the national coastal data bank shall include data regarding current and predicted shore positions, information on federally authorized shore protection projects, and data on the movement of sand along the shores of the United States, including impedi- ments to such movement caused by natural and manmade features. (3) Access The national coastal data bank shall be made readily accessible to the public. (Pub. L. 106–53, title II, § 215(d), Aug. 17, 1999, 113 Stat. 293.) Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries ‘‘SECRETARY’’ DEFINED Secretary means the Secretary of the Army, see sec- tion 2 of Pub. L. 106–53, set out as a note under section 2201 of this title. § 426j. Repealed. Pub. L. 110–114, title II, § 2037(b)(1), Nov. 8, 2007, 121 Stat. 1096 Section, Pub. L. 94–587, § 145, Oct. 22, 1976, 90 Stat. 2931; Pub. L. 99–662, title IX, § 933, Nov. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 4197; Pub. L. 100–676, § 35, Nov. 17, 1988, 102 Stat. 4031; Pub. L. 102–580, title II, § 207, Oct. 31, 1992, 106 Stat. 4829; Pub. L. 106–53, title II, § 217(a), Aug. 17, 1999, 113 Stat. 294, related to placement on State beaches of sand dredged in constructing and maintaining navigation in- lets and channels adjacent to such beaches. Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries EXISTING PROJECTS Pub. L. 110–114, title II, § 2037(b)(2), Nov. 8, 2007, 121 Stat. 1096, provided that: ‘‘The Secretary [of the Army] may complete any project being carried out under sec- tion 145 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 [this section] on the day before the date of enact- ment of this Act [Nov. 8, 2007].’’ § 426k. Five year demonstration program to tem- porarily increase diversion of water from Lake Michigan at Chicago, Illinois (a) Authorization of Secretary of the Army; pur- pose; amounts of increase; incremental ac- complishment; effects on Illinois Waterway; responsibilities for development, implemen- tation, and supervision In order to alleviate water damage on the shoreline of Lake Michigan and others of the

Cross-references

Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

33 U.S.C. § 426i — Shore damage prevention or mitigation

**(a) In general** The Secretary of the Army is authorized to investigate, study, plan, and implement structural and nonstructural measures for the prevention or mitigation of shore damages attributable to Federal navigation works and shore damage attributable to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, if a non-Federal public body agrees to operate and maintain such measures, and, in the case of interests in real property acquired in conjunction with nonstructural measures, to operate and maintain the property for public purposes in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary. **(b) Cost sharing** The costs of implementing measures, including a study, shall be cost-shared in the same proportion as the cost-sharing provisions applicable to construction of the project causing the shore damage. **(c) Requirement for specific authorization** No such project shall be initiated without specific authorization by Congress if the Federal first cost exceeds $15,000,000. **(d) Coordination** The Secretary shall— (1) coordinate the implementation of the measures under this section with other Federal and non-Federal shore protection projects in the same geographic area; and (2) to the extent practicable, combine mitigation projects with other shore protection projects in the same area into a comprehensive regional project. **(e) Reimbursement for feasibility studies** Beginning on December 16, 2016, in any case in which the Secretary implements a project under this section, the Secretary shall reimburse or credit the non-Federal interest for any amounts contributed for the study evaluating the damage in excess of the non-Federal share of the costs, as determined under subsection (b).

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 33 U.S.C. § 426i

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.