Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
15 U.S.C. § 3059 — Unfair or deceptive acts or practices
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 1985
TITLE 15—COMMERCE AND TRADE
§ 3059
(ii) may affirm, reverse, modify, set
aside, or remand for further proceedings,
in whole or in part, the final civil sanction
of the Authority; and
(iii) may make any finding or conclusion
that, in the judgment of the administra-
tive law judge, is proper and based on the
record.
(B) Final decision
A decision under this paragraph shall con-
stitute the decision of the Commission with-
out further proceedings unless a notice or an
application for review is timely filed under
subsection (c).
(c) Review by Commission
(1) Notice of review by Commission
The Commission may, on its own motion, re-
view any decision of an administrative law
judge issued under subsection (b)(3) by pro-
viding written notice to the Authority and
any interested party not later than 30 days
after the date on which the administrative law
judge issues the decision.
(2) Application for review
(A) In general
The Authority or a person aggrieved by a
decision issued under subsection (b)(3) may
petition the Commission for review of such
decision by filing an application for review
not later than 30 days after the date on
which the administrative law judge issues
the decision.
(B) Effect of denial of application for review
If an application for review under subpara-
graph (A) is denied, the decision of the ad-
ministrative law judge shall constitute the
decision of the Commission without further
proceedings.
(C) Discretion of Commission
(i) In general
A decision with respect to whether to
grant an application for review under sub-
paragraph (A) is subject to the discretion
of the Commission.
(ii) Matters to be considered
In determining whether to grant such an
application for review, the Commission
shall consider whether th
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 15 U.S.C. § 3059
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: 6806e0b73085715dd77991ad521a4726d0157ef31b37f8bf583893e0b141a826. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-c30cb3bc7cd990d3302be447
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-15/section-3059-unfair-or-deceptive-acts-or-practices--b29e79aa7c.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 4122e021ee14bf3ff2f8cc2af10b4fdbf9695d8184c4c89e6fb05fd3548e1805
Source location: USCODE-2024-title15-chap57A-sec3059.pdf
Stored source content
Page 1985
TITLE 15—COMMERCE AND TRADE
§ 3059
(ii) may affirm, reverse, modify, set
aside, or remand for further proceedings,
in whole or in part, the final civil sanction
of the Authority; and
(iii) may make any finding or conclusion
that, in the judgment of the administra-
tive law judge, is proper and based on the
record.
(B) Final decision
A decision under this paragraph shall con-
stitute the decision of the Commission with-
out further proceedings unless a notice or an
application for review is timely filed under
subsection (c).
(c) Review by Commission
(1) Notice of review by Commission
The Commission may, on its own motion, re-
view any decision of an administrative law
judge issued under subsection (b)(3) by pro-
viding written notice to the Authority and
any interested party not later than 30 days
after the date on which the administrative law
judge issues the decision.
(2) Application for review
(A) In general
The Authority or a person aggrieved by a
decision issued under subsection (b)(3) may
petition the Commission for review of such
decision by filing an application for review
not later than 30 days after the date on
which the administrative law judge issues
the decision.
(B) Effect of denial of application for review
If an application for review under subpara-
graph (A) is denied, the decision of the ad-
ministrative law judge shall constitute the
decision of the Commission without further
proceedings.
(C) Discretion of Commission
(i) In general
A decision with respect to whether to
grant an application for review under sub-
paragraph (A) is subject to the discretion
of the Commission.
(ii) Matters to be considered
In determining whether to grant such an
application for review, the Commission
shall consider whether the application
makes a reasonable showing that—
(I) a prejudicial error was committed
in the conduct of the proceeding; or
(II) the decision involved—
(aa) an erroneous application of the
anti-doping and medication control or
racetrack safety rules approved by the
Commission; or
(bb) an exercise of discretion or a de-
cision of law or policy that warrants
review by the Commission.
(3) Nature of review
(A) In general
In matters reviewed under this subsection,
the Commission may—
(i) affirm, reverse, modify, set aside, or
remand for further proceedings, in whole
or in part, the decision of the administra-
tive law judge; and
(ii) make any finding or conclusion that,
in the judgement of the Commission, is
proper and based on the record.
(B) De novo review
The Commission shall review de novo the
factual findings and conclusions of law made
by the administrative law judge.
(C) Consideration of additional evidence
(i) Motion by Commission
The Commission may, on its own mo-
tion, allow the consideration of additional
evidence.
(ii) Motion by a party
(I) In general
A party may file a motion to consider
additional evidence at any time before
the issuance of a decision by the Com-
mission, which shall show, with particu-
larity, that—
(aa) such additional evidence is ma-
terial; and
(bb) there were reasonable grounds
for failure to submit the evidence pre-
viously.
(II) Procedure
The Commission may—
(aa) accept or hear additional evi-
dence; or
(bb) remand the proceeding to the
administrative law judge for the con-
sideration of additional evidence.
(d) Stay of proceedings
Review by an administrative law judge or the
Commission under this section shall not operate
as a stay of a final civil sanction of the Author-
ity unless the administrative law judge or Com-
mission orders such a stay.
(Pub. L. 116–260, div. FF, title XII, § 1209, Dec. 27,
2020, 134 Stat. 3272.)
Editorial Notes
REFERENCES IN TEXT
This chapter, referred to in subsec. (b)(2)(A)(ii), was
in the original ‘‘this Act’’ and was translated as read-
ing ‘‘this title’’, meaning title XII of div. FF of Pub. L.
116–260, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.
§ 3059. Unfair or deceptive acts or practices
The sale of a covered horse, or of any other
horse in anticipation of its future participation
in a covered race, shall be considered an unfair
or deceptive act or practice in or affecting com-
merce under section 45(a) of this title if the sell-
er—
(1) knows or has reason to know the horse
has been administered—
(A) a bisphosphonate prior to the horse’s
fourth birthday; or
(B) any other substance or method the Au-
thority determines has a long-term degrad-
ing effect on the soundness of the covered
horse; and
(2) fails to disclose to the buyer the adminis-
tration of the bisphosphonate or other sub-
Page 1986
TITLE 15—COMMERCE AND TRADE
§ 3060
stance or method described in paragraph
(1)(B).
(Pub. L. 116–260, div. FF, title XII, § 1210, Dec. 27,
2020, 134 Stat. 3274.)
§ 3060. State delegation; cooperation
(a) State delegation
(1) In general
The Authority may enter into an agreement
with a State racing commission to implement,
within the jurisdiction of the State racing
commission, a component of the racetrack
safety program or, with the concurrence of the
anti-doping and medication control enforce-
ment agency under section 3054(e) of this title,
a component of the horseracing anti-doping
and medication control program, if the Au-
thority determines that the State racing com-
mission has the ability to implement such
component in accordance with the rules,
standards, and requirements established by
the Authority.
(2) Implementation by State racing commission
A State racing commission or other appro-
priate regulatory body of a State may not im-
plement such a component in a manner less
restrictive than the rule, standard, or require-
ment established by the Authority.
(b) Cooperation
To avoid duplication of functions, facilities,
and personnel, and to attain closer coordination
and greater effectiveness and economy in admin-
istration of Federal and State law, where con-
duct by any person subject to the horseracing
medication control program or the racetrack
safety program may involve both a medication
control or racetrack safety rule violation and
violation of Federal or State law, the Authority
and Federal or State law enforcement authori-
ties shall cooperate and share information.
(Pub. L. 116–260, div. FF, title XII, § 1211, Dec. 27,
2020, 134 Stat. 3274.)
CHAPTER 58—FULL EMPLOYMENT AND
BALANCED GROWTH
Sec.
3101.
Congressional findings.
3102.
Report to Congressional committees.
3103.
National Employment Conference.
SUBCHAPTER I—STRUCTURAL ECONOMIC POLI-
CIES AND PROGRAMS INCLUDING TREATMENT
OF RESOURCE RESTRAINTS
3111.
Congressional statement of purpose.
3112.
Countercyclical employment policies.
3113.
Economic activity coordination.
3114.
Regional and structural employment policies
and programs.
3115.
Youth employment policies and programs.
3116.
Job training, counseling and reservoirs of em-
ployment projects.
3117.
Capital formation.
SUBCHAPTER II—POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
FOR CONGRESSIONAL REVIEW
3131.
Congressional statement of purpose.
3132.
Committee review.
3133.
Exercise of rulemaking powers.
SUBCHAPTER III—GENERAL PROVISIONS
3151.
Nondiscrimination.
3152.
Labor standards.
§ 3101. Congressional findings
(a) The Congress finds that the Nation has suf-
fered substantial unemployment and under-
employment, idleness of other productive re-
sources, high rates of inflation, and inadequate
productivity growth, over prolonged periods of
time, imposing numerous economic and social
costs on the Nation. Such costs include the fol-
lowing:
(1) The Nation is deprived of the full supply
of goods and services, the full utilization of
labor and capital resources, and the related in-
creases in economic well-being that would
occur under conditions of genuine full employ-
ment, production, and real income, balanced
growth, a balanced Federal budget, and the ef-
fective control of inflation.
(2) The output of goods and services is insuf-
ficient to meet pressing national priorities.
(3) Workers are deprived of the job security,
income, skill development, and productivity
necessary to maintain and advance their
standards of living.
(4) Business and industry are deprived of the
production, sales, capital flow, and produc-
tivity necessary to maintain adequate profits,
undertake new investment, create jobs, com-
pete internationally, and contribute to meet-
ing society’s economic needs. These problems
are especially acute for smaller businesses.
Variations in the business cycle and low-level
operations of the economy are far more dam-
aging to smaller businesses than to larger
business concerns because smaller businesses
have fewer available resources, and less access
to resources, to withstand nationwide eco-
nomic adversity. A decline in small business
enterprises contributes to unemployment by
reducing employment opportunities and con-
tributes to inflation by reducing competition.
(5) Unemployment exposes many families to
social, psychological, and physiological costs,
including disruption of family life, loss of indi-
vidual dignity and self-respect, and the aggra-
vation of physical and psychological illnesses,
alcoholism and drug abuse, crime, and social
conflicts.
(6) Federal, State, and local government
budgets are undermined by deficits due to
shortfalls in tax revenues and in increases in
expenditures for unemployment compensation,
public assistance, and other recession-related
services in the areas of criminal justice, alco-
holism and drug abuse, and physical and men-
tal health.
(b) The Congress further finds that:
(1) High unemployment may contribute to
inflation by diminishing labor training and
skills, underutilizing capital resources, reduc-
ing the rate of productivity advance, increas-
ing unit labor costs, and reducing the general
supply of goods and services.
(2) Aggregate monetary and fiscal policies
alone have been unable to achieve full employ-
ment and production, increased real income,
balanced growth, a balanced Federal budget,
adequate productivity growth, proper atten-
tion to national priorities, achievement of an
improved trade balance, and reasonable price
stability, and therefore must be supplemented
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
The sale of a covered horse, or of any other horse in anticipation of its future participation in a covered race, shall be considered an unfair or deceptive act or practice in or affecting commerce under [section 45(a) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section45/a&num=0&edition=prelim) if the seller—
(1) knows or has reason to know the horse has been administered—
(A) a bisphosphonate prior to the horse’s fourth birthday; or
(B) any other substance or method the Authority determines has a long-term degrading effect on the soundness of the covered horse; and
(2) fails to disclose to the buyer the administration of the bisphosphonate or other substance or method described in paragraph (1)(B).
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 15 U.S.C. § 3059
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.