Arkansas Legal Resource Navigator

18 U.S.C. § 401 — Power of court

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

18 U.S.C. § 401 — Power of court

Page 110 TITLE 18—CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE § 401 plete renunciation of his criminal intent, the de- fendant prevented the commission of the crime solicited. A renunciation is not ‘‘voluntary and complete’’ if it is motivated in whole or in part by a decision to postpone the commission of the crime until another time or to substitute an- other victim or another but similar objective. If the defendant raises the affirmative defense at trial, the defendant has the burden of proving the defense by a preponderance of the evidence. (c) It is not a defense to a prosecution under this section that the person solicited could not be convicted of the crime because he lacked the state of mind required for its commission, be- cause he was incompetent or irresponsible, or because he is immune from prosecution or is not subject to prosecution. (Added Pub. L. 98–473, title II, § 1003(a), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2138; amended Pub. L. 99–646, § 26, Nov. 10, 1986, 100 Stat. 3597; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(2)(A), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.) Editorial Notes AMENDMENTS 1994—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–322 inserted ‘‘(notwith- standing section 3571)’’ before ‘‘fined not more than one-half’’. 1986—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 99–646 substituted ‘‘property or against the person of another’’ for ‘‘the person or property of another’’ and inserted ‘‘life imprisonment or’’ before ‘‘death’’. CHAPTER 21—CONTEMPTS Sec. 401. Power of court. 402. Contempts constituting crimes. 403. Protection of the privacy of child victims and child witnesses. Editorial Notes AMENDMENTS 1990—Pub. L. 101–647, title II, § 225(b)(2), Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4806, added item 403. 1949—Act May 24, 1949, ch. 139, § 8(a), (b), 63 Stat. 90, struck out ‘‘CONSTITUTING CRIMES’’

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 18 U.S.C. § 401

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.

Original supplied file — preserved unchanged

Download original Markdown file

File SHA-256: 85d456bafcc1946d2e0d33524260346fd883973d4c2097dc997d5f718e4a88b9. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.

Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.

Open the recorded source website ↗

Record provenance

Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-c1dbc0286f3a5916cde8a8f8
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-18/section-401-power-of-court--65cf74000a.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 52188f4f0b18574639af14458e7fd05b5bea3b51b60ed115625ca2d0757316b0

Source location: USCODE-2024-title18-partI-chap21-sec401.pdf

Stored source content

Page 110 TITLE 18—CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE § 401 plete renunciation of his criminal intent, the de- fendant prevented the commission of the crime solicited. A renunciation is not ‘‘voluntary and complete’’ if it is motivated in whole or in part by a decision to postpone the commission of the crime until another time or to substitute an- other victim or another but similar objective. If the defendant raises the affirmative defense at trial, the defendant has the burden of proving the defense by a preponderance of the evidence. (c) It is not a defense to a prosecution under this section that the person solicited could not be convicted of the crime because he lacked the state of mind required for its commission, be- cause he was incompetent or irresponsible, or because he is immune from prosecution or is not subject to prosecution. (Added Pub. L. 98–473, title II, § 1003(a), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2138; amended Pub. L. 99–646, § 26, Nov. 10, 1986, 100 Stat. 3597; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(2)(A), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.) Editorial Notes AMENDMENTS 1994—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–322 inserted ‘‘(notwith- standing section 3571)’’ before ‘‘fined not more than one-half’’. 1986—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 99–646 substituted ‘‘property or against the person of another’’ for ‘‘the person or property of another’’ and inserted ‘‘life imprisonment or’’ before ‘‘death’’. CHAPTER 21—CONTEMPTS Sec. 401. Power of court. 402. Contempts constituting crimes. 403. Protection of the privacy of child victims and child witnesses. Editorial Notes AMENDMENTS 1990—Pub. L. 101–647, title II, § 225(b)(2), Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4806, added item 403. 1949—Act May 24, 1949, ch. 139, § 8(a), (b), 63 Stat. 90, struck out ‘‘CONSTITUTING CRIMES’’ in chapter heading and substituted ‘‘Contempts constituting crimes’’ for ‘‘Criminal contempts’’ in item 402. § 401. Power of court A court of the United States shall have power to punish by fine or imprisonment, or both, at its discretion, such contempt of its authority, and none other, as— (1) Misbehavior of any person in its presence or so near thereto as to obstruct the adminis- tration of justice; (2) Misbehavior of any of its officers in their official transactions; (3) Disobedience or resistance to its lawful writ, process, order, rule, decree, or command. (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 701; Pub. L. 107–273, div. B, title III, § 3002(a)(1), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1805.) HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES Based on section 385 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Judi- cial Code and Judiciary (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, § 268, 36 Stat. 1163). Said section 385 conferred two powers. The first part authorizing courts of the United States to impose and administer oaths will remain in title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Judicial Code and Judiciary. The second part relat- ing to contempt of court constitutes this section. Changes in phraseology and arrangement were made. Editorial Notes AMENDMENTS 2002—Pub. L. 107–273 inserted ‘‘or both,’’ after ‘‘fine or imprisonment,’’ in introductory provisions. § 402. Contempts constituting crimes Any person, corporation or association will- fully disobeying any lawful writ, process, order, rule, decree, or command of any district court of the United States, including the Foreign Intel- ligence Surveillance Court or the Foreign Intel- ligence Surveillance Court of Review established by section 103 of the Foreign Intelligence Sur- veillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1803), or any court of the District of Columbia, by doing any act or thing therein, or thereby forbidden, if the act or thing so done be of such character as to constitute also a criminal offense under any statute of the United States or under the laws of any State in which the act was committed, shall be prosecuted for such contempt as provided in section 3691 of this title and shall be punished by a fine under this title or imprisonment, or both. Such fine shall be paid to the United States or to the complainant or other party injured by the act constituting the contempt, or may, where more than one is so damaged, be divided or ap- portioned among them as the court may direct, but in no case shall the fine to be paid to the United States exceed, in case the accused is a natural person, the sum of $1,000, nor shall such imprisonment exceed the term of six months. This section shall not be construed to relate to contempts committed in the presence of the court, or so near thereto as to obstruct the ad- ministration of justice, nor to contempts com- mitted in disobedience of any lawful writ, proc- ess, order, rule, decree, or command entered in any suit or action brought or prosecuted in the name of, or on behalf of, the United States, but the same, and all other cases of contempt not specifically embraced in this section may be punished in conformity to the prevailing usages at law. For purposes of this section, the term ‘‘State’’ includes a State of the United States, the Dis- trict of Columbia, and any commonwealth, ter- ritory, or possession of the United States. (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 701; May 24, 1949, ch. 139, § 8(c), 63 Stat. 90; Pub. L. 101–647, title XII, § 1205(c), Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4830; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §§ 330011(f), 330016(2)(E), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2145, 2148; Pub. L. 118–49, § 14(a), Apr. 20, 2024, 138 Stat. 882.) HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES 1948 ACT Based on sections 386, 387, 389, and 390a of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Judicial Code and Judiciary (Oct. 15, 1914, ch. 323, §§ 1, 21, 22, 24, 38 Stat. 730, 738, 739). Section 21 of the Clayton Act, section 386 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Judicial Code and Judiciary, is here consolidated with parts of sections 1, 22, and 24 of the same act. Section 1 of said act, section 390a of title 28 U.S.C., 1940 ed., Judicial Code and Judiciary, defined

Cross-references

Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

18 U.S.C. § 401 — Power of court

A court of the United States shall have power to punish by fine or imprisonment, or both, at its discretion, such contempt of its authority, and none other, as— (1) Misbehavior of any person in its presence or so near thereto as to obstruct the administration of justice; (2) Misbehavior of any of its officers in their official transactions; (3) Disobedience or resistance to its lawful writ, process, order, rule, decree, or command.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 18 U.S.C. § 401

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

50 U.S.C. § 1803 — Designation of judges

**(a) Court to hear applications and grant orders; record of denial; transmittal to court of review** (1) The Chief Justice of the United States shall publicly designate 11 district court judges from at least seven of the United States judicial circuits of whom no fewer than 3 shall reside within 20 miles of the District of Columbia who shall constitute a court which shall have jurisdiction to hear applications for and grant orders approving electronic surveillance anywhere within the United States under the procedures set forth in this chapter, except that no judge designated under this subsection (except when sitting en banc under paragraph (2)) shall hear the same application for electronic surveillance under this chapter which has been denied previously by another judge designated under this subsection. If any judge so designated denies an application for an order authorizing electronic surveillance under this chapter, such judge shall provide immediately for the record a written statement of each reason for his decision and, on motion of the United States, the record shall be transmitted, under seal, to the court of review established in subsection (b). (2) (A) The court established under this subsection may, on its own initiative, or upon the request of the Government in any proceeding or a party under section 1861(f) 11 See References in Text note below. of this title or paragraph (4) or (5) of [section 1881a(i) of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title50-section1881a/i&num=0&edition=prelim), hold a hearing or rehearing, en banc, when ordered by a majority of the judges that constitute such court upon a determination that— (i) en banc consideration is necessary to secure or maintain uniformity of the court’s decis

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 50 U.S.C. § 1803

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 50 U.S.C. § 1803. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

50 U.S.C. § 1803 — Designation of judges

Page 242 TITLE 50—WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE § 1803 the Chief Justice with the concurrence of the Attorney General, in consultation with the Di- rector of National Intelligence, and shall remain sealed unless— (A) an application for a court order with re- spect to the surveillance is made under sec- tions 1801(h)(4) and 1804 of this title; or (B) the certification is necessary to deter- mine the legality of the surveillance under section 1806(f) of this title. (4) With respect to electronic surveillance au- thorized by this subsection, the Attorney Gen- eral may direct a specified communication com- mon carrier to— (A) furnish all information, facilities, or technical assistance necessary to accomplish the electronic surveillance in such a manner as will protect its secrecy and produce a min- imum of interference with the services that such carrier is providing its customers; and (B) maintain under security procedures ap- proved by the Attorney General and the Direc- tor of National Intelligence any records con- cerning the surveillance or the aid furnished which such carrier wishes to retain. The Government shall compensate, at the pre- vailing rate, such carrier for furnishing such aid. (b) Applications for a court order under this subchapter are authorized if the President has, by written authorization, empowered the Attor- ney General to approve applications to the court having jurisdiction under section 1803 of this title, and a judge to whom an application is made may, notwithstanding any other law, grant an order, in conformity with section 1805 of this title, approving electronic surveillance of a foreign power or an agent of a foreign power for the purpose of obtaining foreign intelligence information, except that the court shall not have j

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 50 U.S.C. § 1803

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 50 U.S.C. § 1803. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.