Arkansas Legal Resource Navigator

22 U.S.C. § 5952 — Untitled legal text

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

22 U.S.C. § 5952 — Untitled legal text

Page 1732 TITLE 22—FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE §§ 5952, 5953 1 See References in Text note below. ‘‘(b) CERTIFICATION OF RUSSIA’S COMMITMENT TO HALT CHEMICAL SEPARATION OF WEAPON-GRADE PLUTONIUM.— The prohibition in subsection (a) shall cease to apply upon a certification by the President to Congress that Russia— ‘‘(1) is committed to halting the chemical separa- tion of weapon-grade plutonium from spent nuclear fuel; and ‘‘(2) is taking all practical steps to halt such sepa- ration at the earliest possible date. ‘‘(c) SENSE OF CONGRESS ON PLUTONIUM POLICY.—It is the sense of Congress that a key objective of the United States with respect to the nonproliferation of nuclear weapons should be to obtain a clear and unequivocal commitment from the Government of Russia that it will (1) cease all production and separation of weapon- grade plutonium, and (2) halt chemical separation of plutonium produced in civil nuclear power reactors. ‘‘(d) REPORT.—Not later than June 1, 1994, the Presi- dent shall submit to Congress a report on the status of efforts by the United States to secure the commit- ments and achieve the objective described in sub- sections (b) and (c). The President shall include in the report a discussion of the status of joint efforts by the United States and Russia to replace any remaining Russian plutonium production reactors with alter- native power sources or to convert such reactors to op- eration with alternative fuels that would permit their operation without generating weapon-grade pluto- nium.’’ [Memorandum of President of the United States, Mar. 10, 1994, 59 F.R. 14079, delegated to Secretary of State authority and duty of President under section 1612(b) and (d) of Public Law 103–160 set out above.] §§ 5952, 5953. Repealed.

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 22 U.S.C. § 5952

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.

Original supplied file — preserved unchanged

Download original Markdown file

File SHA-256: 7a08df73cd8bbc806cfad39137e4a5f593563d6de295ffa6b61e59a84f6def3a. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.

Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.

Open the recorded source website ↗

Record provenance

Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-bb226c8d97eb448b3d492275
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-22/section-5952-untitled-legal-text--ad2719bce2.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: d2500cb12eedb4da52f9e8db90f2d483ef975fbddf02a076570b9b10e4722ca5

Source location: USCODE-2024-title22-chap68A-sec5952.pdf

Stored source content

Page 1732 TITLE 22—FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE §§ 5952, 5953 1 See References in Text note below. ‘‘(b) CERTIFICATION OF RUSSIA’S COMMITMENT TO HALT CHEMICAL SEPARATION OF WEAPON-GRADE PLUTONIUM.— The prohibition in subsection (a) shall cease to apply upon a certification by the President to Congress that Russia— ‘‘(1) is committed to halting the chemical separa- tion of weapon-grade plutonium from spent nuclear fuel; and ‘‘(2) is taking all practical steps to halt such sepa- ration at the earliest possible date. ‘‘(c) SENSE OF CONGRESS ON PLUTONIUM POLICY.—It is the sense of Congress that a key objective of the United States with respect to the nonproliferation of nuclear weapons should be to obtain a clear and unequivocal commitment from the Government of Russia that it will (1) cease all production and separation of weapon- grade plutonium, and (2) halt chemical separation of plutonium produced in civil nuclear power reactors. ‘‘(d) REPORT.—Not later than June 1, 1994, the Presi- dent shall submit to Congress a report on the status of efforts by the United States to secure the commit- ments and achieve the objective described in sub- sections (b) and (c). The President shall include in the report a discussion of the status of joint efforts by the United States and Russia to replace any remaining Russian plutonium production reactors with alter- native power sources or to convert such reactors to op- eration with alternative fuels that would permit their operation without generating weapon-grade pluto- nium.’’ [Memorandum of President of the United States, Mar. 10, 1994, 59 F.R. 14079, delegated to Secretary of State authority and duty of President under section 1612(b) and (d) of Public Law 103–160 set out above.] §§ 5952, 5953. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title XIII, § 1351(3), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3607 Section 5952, Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title XII, § 1203, Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1778; Pub. L. 107–314, div. A, title XIII, § 1306(c), formerly § 1306(e), Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2673, renumbered § 1306(c), Pub. L. 109–163, div. A, title XIII, § 1303(2), Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat. 3474; Pub. L. 110–53, title XVIII, § 1811(2), Aug. 3, 2007, 121 Stat. 492; Pub. L. 110–181, div. A, title XIII, § 1304(a)(2), Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 412, related to authority for programs to facili- tate cooperative threat reduction. Section 5953, Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title XII, § 1204, Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1779, authorized designation of Demilitarization Enterprise Fund. Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries UTILIZATION OF CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION PROGRAM Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title XIII, § 1303, Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2557, as amended by Pub. L. 113–66, div. A, title XIII, § 1303, Dec. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 931, which authorized the Secretary of Defense, through Dec. 31, 2018, to enter into agreements with any person (including a foreign government, international organization, multinational entity, or any other entity) under which the person would contribute funds for activities conducted under the Cooperative Threat Reduction Program, was re- pealed by Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title XIII, § 1351(12)(A), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3607. COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION DEFENSE AND MILITARY CONTACTS PROGRAM Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title XIII, § 1306(a), Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2560, which set out standards for the adminis- tration of the Defense and Military Contacts Program under the Cooperative Threat Reduction Program, was repealed by Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title XIII, § 1351(12)(C), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3607. LIMITED WAIVER OF RESTRICTIONS ON USE OF FUNDS FOR THREAT REDUCTION IN STATES OF THE FORMER SOVIET UNION Pub. L. 107–314, div. A, title XIII, § 1306(a)–(d), Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2673, as amended by Pub. L. 109–163, div. A, title XIII, § 1303(1), Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat. 3474, which authorized the President to waive the restrictions and eligibility requirements set out in former section 5952(d) of this title for the obligation and expenditure of funds under that section for assistance to an inde- pendent state of the former Soviet Union, was repealed by Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title XIII, § 1351(10), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3607. REQUIREMENT TO CONSIDER USE OF REVENUE GEN- ERATED BY ACTIVITIES CARRIED OUT UNDER COOPER- ATIVE THREAT REDUCTION PROGRAMS Pub. L. 107–107, div. A, title XIII, § 1304, Dec. 28, 2001, 115 Stat. 1255, which required that the Secretary of De- fense consider the use of revenue generated by activi- ties carried out under Cooperative Threat Reduction programs in negotiating and executing contracts with Russia to carry out such programs, was repealed by Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title XIII, § 1351(9), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3607. LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR CERTAIN PURPOSES Pub. L. 107–314, div. A, title XIII, § 1305, Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2673, which prohibited the use of funds appro- priated for Cooperative Threat Reduction programs for the design, planning, or construction of a second wing for a storage facility for Russian fissile material, was repealed by Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title XIII, § 1351(10), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3607. Pub. L. 106–398, § 1 [[div. A], title XIII, § 1303], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–340, which prohibited the obli- gation or expenditure of funds appropriated for Cooper- ative Threat Reduction programs for the elimination of conventional weapons or the delivery vehicles pri- marily intended to deliver such weapons, was repealed by Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title XIII, § 1351(8)(A), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3607. Pub. L. 106–398, § 1 [[div. A], title XIII, § 1304], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–340, as amended by Pub. L. 107–107, div. A, title XIII, § 1305(b), Dec. 28, 2001, 115 Stat. 1255, which limited the use of funds appropriated for Cooperative Threat Reduction programs for the planning, design, or construction of the first wing for the storage facility for Russian fissile material referred to in section 1302(a)(5) of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (114 Stat. 1654–339) to not more than $412,600,000, was re- pealed by Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title XIII, § 1351(8)(A), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3607. REQUIREMENT TO SUBMIT SUMMARY OF AMOUNTS REQUESTED BY PROJECT CATEGORY Pub. L. 105–261, div. A, title XIII, § 1307, Oct. 17, 1998, 112 Stat. 2165, as amended by Pub. L. 108–375, div. A, title XIII, § 1304, Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 2094, which re- quired that the Secretary of Defense submit to Con- gress an annual descriptive summary of the appropria- tions requested for Cooperative Threat Reduction pro- grams and the obligation or expenditure of such appro- priations for the previous fiscal year, was repealed by Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title XIII, § 1351(6), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3607. § 5954. Funding for fiscal year 1994 (a) Authorization of appropriations Funds authorized to be appropriated under section 301(21) 1 shall be available for cooperative

Cross-references

Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.

No explicit source connection was found. This does not mean there are no relevant authorities.