Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
22 U.S.C. § 5952 — Untitled legal text
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 1732
TITLE 22—FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE
§§ 5952, 5953
1 See References in Text note below.
‘‘(b) CERTIFICATION OF RUSSIA’S COMMITMENT TO HALT
CHEMICAL SEPARATION OF WEAPON-GRADE PLUTONIUM.—
The prohibition in subsection (a) shall cease to apply
upon a certification by the President to Congress that
Russia—
‘‘(1) is committed to halting the chemical separa-
tion of weapon-grade plutonium from spent nuclear
fuel; and
‘‘(2) is taking all practical steps to halt such sepa-
ration at the earliest possible date.
‘‘(c) SENSE OF CONGRESS ON PLUTONIUM POLICY.—It is
the sense of Congress that a key objective of the United
States with respect to the nonproliferation of nuclear
weapons should be to obtain a clear and unequivocal
commitment from the Government of Russia that it
will (1) cease all production and separation of weapon-
grade plutonium, and (2) halt chemical separation of
plutonium produced in civil nuclear power reactors.
‘‘(d) REPORT.—Not later than June 1, 1994, the Presi-
dent shall submit to Congress a report on the status of
efforts by the United States to secure the commit-
ments and achieve the objective described in sub-
sections (b) and (c). The President shall include in the
report a discussion of the status of joint efforts by the
United States and Russia to replace any remaining
Russian plutonium production reactors with alter-
native power sources or to convert such reactors to op-
eration with alternative fuels that would permit their
operation without generating weapon-grade pluto-
nium.’’
[Memorandum of President of the United States, Mar.
10, 1994, 59 F.R. 14079, delegated to Secretary of State
authority and duty of President under section 1612(b)
and (d) of Public Law 103–160 set out above.]
§§ 5952, 5953. Repealed.
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 22 U.S.C. § 5952
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: 7a08df73cd8bbc806cfad39137e4a5f593563d6de295ffa6b61e59a84f6def3a. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-bb226c8d97eb448b3d492275
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-22/section-5952-untitled-legal-text--ad2719bce2.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: d2500cb12eedb4da52f9e8db90f2d483ef975fbddf02a076570b9b10e4722ca5
Source location: USCODE-2024-title22-chap68A-sec5952.pdf
Stored source content
Page 1732
TITLE 22—FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE
§§ 5952, 5953
1 See References in Text note below.
‘‘(b) CERTIFICATION OF RUSSIA’S COMMITMENT TO HALT
CHEMICAL SEPARATION OF WEAPON-GRADE PLUTONIUM.—
The prohibition in subsection (a) shall cease to apply
upon a certification by the President to Congress that
Russia—
‘‘(1) is committed to halting the chemical separa-
tion of weapon-grade plutonium from spent nuclear
fuel; and
‘‘(2) is taking all practical steps to halt such sepa-
ration at the earliest possible date.
‘‘(c) SENSE OF CONGRESS ON PLUTONIUM POLICY.—It is
the sense of Congress that a key objective of the United
States with respect to the nonproliferation of nuclear
weapons should be to obtain a clear and unequivocal
commitment from the Government of Russia that it
will (1) cease all production and separation of weapon-
grade plutonium, and (2) halt chemical separation of
plutonium produced in civil nuclear power reactors.
‘‘(d) REPORT.—Not later than June 1, 1994, the Presi-
dent shall submit to Congress a report on the status of
efforts by the United States to secure the commit-
ments and achieve the objective described in sub-
sections (b) and (c). The President shall include in the
report a discussion of the status of joint efforts by the
United States and Russia to replace any remaining
Russian plutonium production reactors with alter-
native power sources or to convert such reactors to op-
eration with alternative fuels that would permit their
operation without generating weapon-grade pluto-
nium.’’
[Memorandum of President of the United States, Mar.
10, 1994, 59 F.R. 14079, delegated to Secretary of State
authority and duty of President under section 1612(b)
and (d) of Public Law 103–160 set out above.]
§§ 5952, 5953. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–291, div. A,
title XIII, § 1351(3), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat.
3607
Section 5952, Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title XII, § 1203,
Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1778; Pub. L. 107–314, div. A, title
XIII, § 1306(c), formerly § 1306(e), Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat.
2673, renumbered § 1306(c), Pub. L. 109–163, div. A, title
XIII, § 1303(2), Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat. 3474; Pub. L. 110–53,
title XVIII, § 1811(2), Aug. 3, 2007, 121 Stat. 492; Pub. L.
110–181, div. A, title XIII, § 1304(a)(2), Jan. 28, 2008, 122
Stat. 412, related to authority for programs to facili-
tate cooperative threat reduction.
Section 5953, Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title XII, § 1204,
Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1779, authorized designation of
Demilitarization Enterprise Fund.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
UTILIZATION OF CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE COOPERATIVE
THREAT REDUCTION PROGRAM
Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title XIII, § 1303, Oct. 28, 2009,
123 Stat. 2557, as amended by Pub. L. 113–66, div. A, title
XIII, § 1303, Dec. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 931, which authorized
the Secretary of Defense, through Dec. 31, 2018, to enter
into agreements with any person (including a foreign
government, international organization, multinational
entity, or any other entity) under which the person
would contribute funds for activities conducted under
the Cooperative Threat Reduction Program, was re-
pealed by Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title XIII, § 1351(12)(A),
Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3607.
COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION DEFENSE AND
MILITARY CONTACTS PROGRAM
Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title XIII, § 1306(a), Oct. 28, 2009,
123 Stat. 2560, which set out standards for the adminis-
tration of the Defense and Military Contacts Program
under the Cooperative Threat Reduction Program, was
repealed by Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title XIII,
§ 1351(12)(C), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3607.
LIMITED WAIVER
OF RESTRICTIONS
ON USE
OF FUNDS
FOR THREAT REDUCTION
IN STATES
OF
THE FORMER
SOVIET UNION
Pub. L. 107–314, div. A, title XIII, § 1306(a)–(d), Dec. 2,
2002, 116 Stat. 2673, as amended by Pub. L. 109–163, div.
A, title XIII, § 1303(1), Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat. 3474, which
authorized the President to waive the restrictions and
eligibility requirements set out in former section
5952(d) of this title for the obligation and expenditure
of funds under that section for assistance to an inde-
pendent state of the former Soviet Union, was repealed
by Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title XIII, § 1351(10), Dec. 19,
2014, 128 Stat. 3607.
REQUIREMENT
TO
CONSIDER
USE
OF
REVENUE
GEN-
ERATED BY ACTIVITIES CARRIED OUT UNDER COOPER-
ATIVE THREAT REDUCTION PROGRAMS
Pub. L. 107–107, div. A, title XIII, § 1304, Dec. 28, 2001,
115 Stat. 1255, which required that the Secretary of De-
fense consider the use of revenue generated by activi-
ties carried out under Cooperative Threat Reduction
programs in negotiating and executing contracts with
Russia to carry out such programs, was repealed by
Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title XIII, § 1351(9), Dec. 19, 2014,
128 Stat. 3607.
LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR CERTAIN PURPOSES
Pub. L. 107–314, div. A, title XIII, § 1305, Dec. 2, 2002,
116 Stat. 2673, which prohibited the use of funds appro-
priated for Cooperative Threat Reduction programs for
the design, planning, or construction of a second wing
for a storage facility for Russian fissile material, was
repealed by Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title XIII, § 1351(10),
Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3607.
Pub. L. 106–398, § 1 [[div. A], title XIII, § 1303], Oct. 30,
2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–340, which prohibited the obli-
gation or expenditure of funds appropriated for Cooper-
ative Threat Reduction programs for the elimination of
conventional weapons or the delivery vehicles pri-
marily intended to deliver such weapons, was repealed
by Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title XIII, § 1351(8)(A), Dec. 19,
2014, 128 Stat. 3607.
Pub. L. 106–398, § 1 [[div. A], title XIII, § 1304], Oct. 30,
2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–340, as amended by Pub. L.
107–107, div. A, title XIII, § 1305(b), Dec. 28, 2001, 115
Stat. 1255, which limited the use of funds appropriated
for Cooperative Threat Reduction programs for the
planning, design, or construction of the first wing for
the storage facility for Russian fissile material referred
to in section 1302(a)(5) of the Floyd D. Spence National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (114
Stat. 1654–339) to not more than $412,600,000, was re-
pealed by Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title XIII, § 1351(8)(A),
Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3607.
REQUIREMENT TO SUBMIT SUMMARY OF AMOUNTS
REQUESTED BY PROJECT CATEGORY
Pub. L. 105–261, div. A, title XIII, § 1307, Oct. 17, 1998,
112 Stat. 2165, as amended by Pub. L. 108–375, div. A,
title XIII, § 1304, Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 2094, which re-
quired that the Secretary of Defense submit to Con-
gress an annual descriptive summary of the appropria-
tions requested for Cooperative Threat Reduction pro-
grams and the obligation or expenditure of such appro-
priations for the previous fiscal year, was repealed by
Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title XIII, § 1351(6), Dec. 19, 2014,
128 Stat. 3607.
§ 5954. Funding for fiscal year 1994
(a) Authorization of appropriations
Funds authorized to be appropriated under
section 301(21) 1 shall be available for cooperative
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
No explicit source connection was found. This does not mean there are no relevant authorities.