Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
42 U.S.C. § 289 — Institutional review boards; ethics guid-
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 796
TITLE 42—THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE
§ 289
PART H—GENERAL PROVISIONS
Editorial Notes
CODIFICATION
Pub. L. 103–43, title I, § 141(a)(2), June 10, 1993, 107
Stat. 136, redesignated part G ‘‘General Provisions’’ as
H. Former part H ‘‘National Foundation for Biomedical
Research’’ redesignated I.
§ 289. Institutional review boards; ethics guid-
ance program
(a) The Secretary shall by regulation require
that each entity which applies for a grant, con-
tract, or cooperative agreement under this chap-
ter for any project or program which involves
the conduct of biomedical or behavioral research
involving human subjects submit in or with its
application for such grant, contract, or coopera-
tive agreement assurances satisfactory to the
Secretary that it has established (in accordance
with regulations which the Secretary shall pre-
scribe) a board (to be known as an ‘‘Institutional
Review Board’’) to review biomedical and behav-
ioral research involving human subjects con-
ducted at or supported by such entity in order to
protect the rights of the human subjects of such
research.
(b)(1) The Secretary shall establish a program
within the Department of Health and Human
Services under which requests for clarification
and guidance with respect to ethical issues
raised in connection with biomedical or behav-
ioral research involving human subjects are re-
sponded to promptly and appropriately.
(2) The Secretary shall establish a process for
the prompt and appropriate response to informa-
tion provided to the Director of NIH respecting
incidences of violations of the rights of human
subjects of research for which funds have been
made available under this chapter. The process
shall include procedures for the receiving of re-
ports of such informatio
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 42 U.S.C. § 289
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: d71123f54943daad241e120441352a9d5d2a1c68c6c4c6586d2a0a9b3f65078b. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-b984b5a50ec30b91aca30f34
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-42/section-289-institutional-review-boards-ethics-guid--5959beb1de.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 7f62ec63fcdef4a9fc27a0af1fc9679897f346c73dc03044c7aea6cb89ef2e21
Source location: USCODE-2024-title42-chap6A-subchapIII-partH-sec289.pdf
Stored source content
Page 796
TITLE 42—THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE
§ 289
PART H—GENERAL PROVISIONS
Editorial Notes
CODIFICATION
Pub. L. 103–43, title I, § 141(a)(2), June 10, 1993, 107
Stat. 136, redesignated part G ‘‘General Provisions’’ as
H. Former part H ‘‘National Foundation for Biomedical
Research’’ redesignated I.
§ 289. Institutional review boards; ethics guid-
ance program
(a) The Secretary shall by regulation require
that each entity which applies for a grant, con-
tract, or cooperative agreement under this chap-
ter for any project or program which involves
the conduct of biomedical or behavioral research
involving human subjects submit in or with its
application for such grant, contract, or coopera-
tive agreement assurances satisfactory to the
Secretary that it has established (in accordance
with regulations which the Secretary shall pre-
scribe) a board (to be known as an ‘‘Institutional
Review Board’’) to review biomedical and behav-
ioral research involving human subjects con-
ducted at or supported by such entity in order to
protect the rights of the human subjects of such
research.
(b)(1) The Secretary shall establish a program
within the Department of Health and Human
Services under which requests for clarification
and guidance with respect to ethical issues
raised in connection with biomedical or behav-
ioral research involving human subjects are re-
sponded to promptly and appropriately.
(2) The Secretary shall establish a process for
the prompt and appropriate response to informa-
tion provided to the Director of NIH respecting
incidences of violations of the rights of human
subjects of research for which funds have been
made available under this chapter. The process
shall include procedures for the receiving of re-
ports of such information from recipients of
funds under this chapter and taking appropriate
action with respect to such violations.
(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title IV, § 491, as added Pub.
L. 99–158, § 2, Nov. 20, 1985, 99 Stat. 873.)
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
PROTECTION OF HUMAN RESEARCH SUBJECTS
Pub. L. 114–255, div. A, title III, § 3023, Dec. 13, 2016, 130
Stat. 1098, provided that:
‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—In order to simplify and facilitate
compliance by researchers with applicable regulations
for the protection of human subjects in research, the
Secretary of Health and Human Services (referred to in
this section as the ‘Secretary’) shall, to the extent
practicable and consistent with other statutory provi-
sions, harmonize differences between the HHS Human
Subject Regulations and the FDA Human Subject Reg-
ulations in accordance with subsection (b).
‘‘(b) AVOIDING REGULATORY DUPLICATION AND UNNEC-
ESSARY DELAYS.—The Secretary shall, as appropriate—
‘‘(1) make such modifications to the provisions of
the HHS Human Subject Regulations, the FDA
Human Subject Regulations, and the vulnerable pop-
ulations rules as may be necessary—
‘‘(A) to reduce regulatory duplication and unnec-
essary delays;
‘‘(B) to modernize such provisions in the context
of multisite and cooperative research projects; and
‘‘(C) to protect vulnerable populations, incor-
porate local considerations, and support commu-
nity engagement through mechanisms such as con-
sultation with local researchers and human re-
search protection programs, in a manner consistent
with subparagraph (B); and
‘‘(2) ensure that human subject research that is
subject to the HHS Human Subject Regulations and
to the FDA Human Subject Regulations may—
‘‘(A) use joint or shared review;
‘‘(B) rely upon the review of—
‘‘(i) an independent institutional review board;
or
‘‘(ii) an institutional review board of an entity
other than the sponsor of the research; or
‘‘(C) use similar arrangements to avoid duplica-
tion of effort.
‘‘(c) CONSULTATION.—In harmonizing or modifying
regulations or guidance under this section, the Sec-
retary shall consult with stakeholders (including re-
searchers, academic organizations, hospitals, institu-
tional research boards, pharmaceutical, biotechnology,
and medical device developers, clinical research organi-
zations, patient groups, and others).
‘‘(d) TIMING.—The Secretary shall complete the har-
monization described in subsection (a) not later than 3
years after the date of enactment of this Act [Dec. 13,
2016].
‘‘(e) PROGRESS REPORT.—Not later than 2 years after
the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall
submit to Congress a report on the progress made to-
ward completing such harmonization.
‘‘(f) DEFINITIONS.—
‘‘(1) HUMAN SUBJECT REGULATIONS.—In this section:
‘‘(A) FDA
HUMAN
SUBJECT
REGULATIONS.—The
term ‘FDA Human Subject Regulations’ means the
provisions of parts 50, 56, 312, and 812 of title 21,
Code of Federal Regulations (or any successor regu-
lations).
‘‘(B) HHS
HUMAN
SUBJECT
REGULATIONS.—The
term ‘HHS Human Subject Regulations’ means the
provisions of subpart A of part 46 of title 45, Code
of Federal Regulations (or any successor regula-
tions).
‘‘(C) VULNERABLE POPULATION RULES.—The term
‘vulnerable population rules’ means—
‘‘(i) except in the case of research described in
clause (ii), the provisions of subparts B through D
of part 46, Code of Federal Regulations (or any
successor regulations); and
‘‘(ii) in the case of research that is subject to
FDA Human Subject Regulations, the provisions
applicable to vulnerable populations under part 56
of title 21, Code of Federal Regulations (or any
successor regulations) and subpart D of part 50 of
such title 21 (or any successor regulations).
‘‘(2) INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD DEFINED.—In this
section, the term ‘institutional review board’ has the
meaning that applies to the term ‘institutional re-
view board’ under the HHS Human Subject Regula-
tions.’’
INFORMED CONSENT FOR NEWBORN SCREENING
RESEARCH
Pub. L. 113–240, § 12, Dec. 18, 2014, 128 Stat. 2857, pro-
vided that:
‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Research on newborn dried blood
spots shall be considered research carried out on
human subjects meeting the definition of section
46.102(f)(2) of title 45, Code of Federal Regulations, for
purposes of Federally funded research conducted pursu-
ant to the Public Health Service Act [42 U.S.C. 201 et
seq.] until such time as updates to the Federal Policy
for the Protection of Human Subjects (the Common
Rule) are promulgated pursuant to subsection (c). For
purposes of this subsection, sections 46.116(c) and
46.116(d) of title 45, Code of Federal Regulations, shall
not apply.
‘‘(b) EFFECTIVE
DATE.—Subsection (a) shall apply
only to newborn dried blood spots used for purposes of
Federally funded research that were collected not ear-
lier than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act
[Dec. 18, 2014].
Page 797
TITLE 42—THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE
§ 289a
1 See References in Text note below.
‘‘(c) REGULATIONS.—Not later than 6 months after the
date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Health
and Human Services shall promulgate proposed regula-
tions related to the updating of the Federal Policy for
the Protection of Human Subjects (the Common Rule),
particularly with respect to informed consent. Not
later than 2 years after such date of enactment, the
Secretary shall promulgate final regulations based on
such proposed regulations.’’
STUDY CONCERNING RESEARCH INVOLVING CHILDREN
Pub. L. 107–109, § 12, Jan. 4, 2002, 115 Stat. 1416, pro-
vided that:
‘‘(a) CONTRACT WITH INSTITUTE
OF MEDICINE.—The
Secretary of Health and Human Services shall enter
into a contract with the Institute of Medicine for—
‘‘(1) the conduct, in accordance with subsection (b),
of a review of—
‘‘(A) Federal regulations in effect on the date of
the enactment of this Act [Jan. 4, 2002] relating to
research involving children;
‘‘(B) federally prepared or supported reports relat-
ing to research involving children; and
‘‘(C) federally supported evidence-based research
involving children; and
‘‘(2) the submission to the Committee on Health,
Education, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate and the
Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of
Representatives, not later than two years after the
date of enactment of this Act, of a report concerning
the review conducted under paragraph (1) that in-
cludes recommendations on best practices relating to
research involving children.
‘‘(b) AREAS
OF REVIEW.—In conducting the review
under subsection (a)(1), the Institute of Medicine shall
consider the following:
‘‘(1) The written and oral process of obtaining and
defining ‘assent’, ‘permission’ and ‘informed consent’
with respect to child clinical research participants
and the parents, guardians, and the individuals who
may serve as the legally authorized representatives
of such children (as defined in subpart A of part 46 of
title 45, Code of Federal Regulations).
‘‘(2) The expectations and comprehension of child
research participants and the parents, guardians, or
legally authorized representatives of such children,
for the direct benefits and risks of the child’s re-
search involvement, particularly in terms of research
versus therapeutic treatment.
‘‘(3) The definition of ‘minimal risk’ with respect to
a healthy child or a child with an illness.
‘‘(4) The appropriateness of the regulations applica-
ble to children of differing ages and maturity levels,
including regulations relating to legal status.
‘‘(5) Whether payment (financial or otherwise) may
be provided to a child or his or her parent, guardian,
or legally authorized representative for the participa-
tion of the child in research, and if so, the amount
and type of payment that may be made.
‘‘(6) Compliance with the regulations referred to in
subsection (a)(1)(A), the monitoring of such compli-
ance (including the role of institutional review
boards), and the enforcement actions taken for viola-
tions of such regulations.
‘‘(7) The unique roles and responsibilities of institu-
tional review boards in reviewing research involving
children, including composition of membership on in-
stitutional review boards.
‘‘(c) REQUIREMENTS OF EXPERTISE.—The Institute of
Medicine shall conduct the review under subsection
(a)(1) and make recommendations under subsection
(a)(2) in conjunction with experts in pediatric medicine,
pediatric research, and the ethical conduct of research
involving children.’’
REQUIREMENT FOR ADDITIONAL PROTECTIONS FOR
CHILDREN INVOLVED IN RESEARCH
Pub. L. 106–310, div. A, title XXVII, § 2701, Oct. 17,
2000, 114 Stat. 1167, as amended by Pub. L. 106–505, title
X, § 1001(a), Nov. 13, 2000, 114 Stat. 2350, provided that:
‘‘Notwithstanding any other provision of law, not later
than 6 months after the date of the enactment of this
Act [Oct. 17, 2000], the Secretary of Health and Human
Services shall require that all research involving chil-
dren that is conducted, supported, or regulated by the
Department of Health and Human Services be in com-
pliance with subpart D of part 46 of title 45, Code of
Federal Regulations.’’
[Pub. L. 106–505, title X, § 1001(b), Nov. 13, 2000, 114
Stat. 2350, provided that: ‘‘The amendment made by
subsection (a) [amending section 2701 of Pub. L. 106–310,
set out above] takes effect on the date of the enact-
ment of the Children’s Health Act of 2000 [Oct. 17,
2000].’’]
§ 289a. Peer review requirements
(a) Applications for biomedical and behavioral
research
grants,
cooperative
agreements,
and contracts; regulations
(1) The Secretary, acting through the Director
of NIH, shall by regulation require appropriate
technical and scientific peer review of—
(A) applications made for grants and cooper-
ative agreements under this chapter for bio-
medical and behavioral research; and
(B) applications made for biomedical and be-
havioral research and development contracts
to be administered through the National Insti-
tutes of Health.
(2) Regulations promulgated under paragraph
(1) shall require that the review of applications
made for grants, contracts, and cooperative
agreements required by the regulations be con-
ducted—
(A) to the extent practical, in a manner con-
sistent with the system for technical and sci-
entific peer review applicable on November 20,
1985, to grants under this chapter for bio-
medical and behavioral research, and
(B) to the extent practical, by technical and
scientific peer review groups performing such
review on or before November 20, 1985,
and shall authorize such review to be conducted
by groups appointed under sections 282(b)(16) and
284(c)(3) of this title.
(b) Periodic review of research at National Insti-
tutes of Health
The Director of NIH shall establish procedures
for periodic technical and scientific peer review
of research at the National Institutes of Health.
Such procedures shall require that—
(1) the reviewing entity be provided a writ-
ten description of the research to be reviewed,
and
(2) the reviewing entity provide the advisory
council of the national research institute in-
volved with such description and the results of
the review by the entity,
and shall authorize such review to be conducted
by groups appointed under sections 282(b)(6) 1
and 284(c)(3) of this title.
(c) Compliance with requirements for inclusion
of women and minorities in clinical research
(1) In technical and scientific peer review
under this section of proposals for clinical re-
search, the consideration of any such proposal
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Beginning with fiscal year 2010, the Secretary shall transfer from the Public Health and Social Services Emergency Fund such sums as may be necessary to carry out this part.
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 42 U.S.C. § 201
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 42 U.S.C. § 201. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 35
TITLE 42—THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE
§ 201
1 See References in Text note below.
Sec.
300jj–34.
Competitive grants to States and Indian
tribes for the development of loan pro-
grams to facilitate the widespread
adoption of certified EHR technology.
300jj–35.
Demonstration program to integrate in-
formation
technology
into
clinical
education.
300jj–36.
Information technology professionals in
health care.
300jj–37.
General grant and loan provisions.
300jj–38.
Authorization for appropriations.
PART C—OTHER PROVISIONS
300jj–51.
Health information technology enroll-
ment standards and protocols.
300jj–52.
Information blocking.
SUBCHAPTER XXIX—DATA COLLECTION,
ANALYSIS, AND QUALITY
300kk.
Data collection, analysis, and quality.
SUBCHAPTER XXX—COMMUNITY LIVING
ASSISTANCE SERVICES AND SUPPORTS
300ll to 300ll–9. Repealed.
SUBCHAPTER XXXI—WORLD TRADE CENTER
HEALTH PROGRAM
PART A—ESTABLISHMENT OF PROGRAM; ADVISORY
COMMITTEE
300mm.
Establishment of World Trade Center
Health Program.
300mm–1.
WTC Health Program Scientific/Tech-
nical
Advisory
Committee;
WTC
Health Program Steering Committees.
300mm–2.
Education and outreach.
300mm–3.
Uniform data collection and analysis.
300mm–4.
Clinical Centers of Excellence and Data
Centers.
300mm–5.
Definitions.
PART B—PROGRAM OF MONITORING, INITIAL HEALTH
EVALUATIONS, AND TREATMENT
SUBPART 1—WTC RESPONDERS
300mm–21.
Identification of WTC responders and
provision of WTC-related monitoring
services.
300mm–22.
Treatment of enrolled WTC responders
for WTC-related health conditions.
300mm–23.
National arrangement for benefits for el-
igible individuals outside New York.
SUBPART 2—WTC SURVIVORS
300mm–31.
Identification and initial health evalua-
tion of screening-eligible and
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 42 U.S.C. § 201
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 42 U.S.C. § 201. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a)** The Secretary shall by regulation require that each entity which applies for a grant, contract, or cooperative agreement under this chapter for any project or program which involves the conduct of biomedical or behavioral research involving human subjects submit in or with its application for such grant, contract, or cooperative agreement assurances satisfactory to the Secretary that it has established (in accordance with regulations which the Secretary shall prescribe) a board (to be known as an “Institutional Review Board”) to review biomedical and behavioral research involving human subjects conducted at or supported by such entity in order to protect the rights of the human subjects of such research.
**(b)**
(1) The Secretary shall establish a program within the Department of Health and Human Services under which requests for clarification and guidance with respect to ethical issues raised in connection with biomedical or behavioral research involving human subjects are responded to promptly and appropriately.
(2) The Secretary shall establish a process for the prompt and appropriate response to information provided to the Director of NIH respecting incidences of violations of the rights of human subjects of research for which funds have been made available under this chapter. The process shall include procedures for the receiving of reports of such information from recipients of funds under this chapter and taking appropriate action with respect to such violations.
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 42 U.S.C. § 289
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.