Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
33 U.S.C. § 921 — Review of compensation orders
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 300
TITLE 33—NAVIGATION AND NAVIGABLE WATERS
§ 920
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
1984—Subsecs. (a), (b), (g), (h). Pub. L. 98–426,
§ 27(a)(2), substituted ‘‘Secretary’’ for ‘‘commission’’.
See Transfer of Functions note under section 902 of this
title.
1978—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 95–251 substituted ref-
erences to administrative law judges for references to
hearing examiners.
1972—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 92–576 substituted provi-
sions for conduct of hearings under section 554 of title
5 by a hearing examiner qualified under section 3105 of
title 5 and vesting in hearing examiners the powers, du-
ties, and responsibilities vested in deputy commis-
sioners on Oct. 27, 1972, for former provisions author-
izing claimant and employer to present evidence with
respect to claims and for representation of a claimant
under a written authorization.
1960—Subsecs. (c), (e). Pub. L. 86–507 inserted ‘‘or by
certified mail’’ after ‘‘registered mail’’.
1938—Subsec. (g). Act June 25, 1938, authorized trans-
fer of cases, with administrative approval, at any time
after filing of claim for the additional purposes of mak-
ing investigations and taking other necessary action
instead of after issuance of compensation order without
anyone’s approval.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1984 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 98–426 effective Sept. 28, 1984,
see section 28(e)(1) of Pub. L. 98–426, set out as a note
under section 901 of this title.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1972 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 92–576 effective 30 days after
Oct. 27, 1972, see section 22 of Pub. L. 92–576, set out as
a note under section 902 of this title.
§ 920. Presumptions
In any proceeding for the enforcement of a
claim for compensation under this chapter it
shall be pres
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 33 U.S.C. § 921
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: d9ee52a22dcd22cba7f8a9a8cbb2e1bd612e0942af2590f56427d7b5acfa07af. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-b2cb0a492f3582f8112de6cb
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-33/section-921-review-of-compensation-orders--0c087d06c4.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 1ef98d0b453c64f95d4e991d061e4eabf712e5fae1815d1e0e124d858019ce6e
Source location: USCODE-2024-title33-chap18-sec921.pdf
Stored source content
Page 300
TITLE 33—NAVIGATION AND NAVIGABLE WATERS
§ 920
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
1984—Subsecs. (a), (b), (g), (h). Pub. L. 98–426,
§ 27(a)(2), substituted ‘‘Secretary’’ for ‘‘commission’’.
See Transfer of Functions note under section 902 of this
title.
1978—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 95–251 substituted ref-
erences to administrative law judges for references to
hearing examiners.
1972—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 92–576 substituted provi-
sions for conduct of hearings under section 554 of title
5 by a hearing examiner qualified under section 3105 of
title 5 and vesting in hearing examiners the powers, du-
ties, and responsibilities vested in deputy commis-
sioners on Oct. 27, 1972, for former provisions author-
izing claimant and employer to present evidence with
respect to claims and for representation of a claimant
under a written authorization.
1960—Subsecs. (c), (e). Pub. L. 86–507 inserted ‘‘or by
certified mail’’ after ‘‘registered mail’’.
1938—Subsec. (g). Act June 25, 1938, authorized trans-
fer of cases, with administrative approval, at any time
after filing of claim for the additional purposes of mak-
ing investigations and taking other necessary action
instead of after issuance of compensation order without
anyone’s approval.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1984 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 98–426 effective Sept. 28, 1984,
see section 28(e)(1) of Pub. L. 98–426, set out as a note
under section 901 of this title.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1972 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 92–576 effective 30 days after
Oct. 27, 1972, see section 22 of Pub. L. 92–576, set out as
a note under section 902 of this title.
§ 920. Presumptions
In any proceeding for the enforcement of a
claim for compensation under this chapter it
shall be presumed, in the absence of substantial
evidence to the contrary—
(a) That the claim comes within the provisions
of this chapter.
(b) That sufficient notice of such claim has
been given.
(c) That the injury was not occasioned solely
by the intoxication of the injured employee.
(d) That the injury was not occasioned by the
willful intention of the injured employee to in-
jure or kill himself or another.
(Mar. 4, 1927, ch. 509, § 20, 44 Stat. 1436.)
§ 921. Review of compensation orders
(a) Effectiveness and finality of orders
A compensation order shall become effective
when filed in the office of the deputy commis-
sioner as provided in section 919 of this title,
and, unless proceedings for the suspension or
setting aside of such order are instituted as pro-
vided in subsection (b) of this section, shall be-
come final at the expiration of the thirtieth day
thereafter.
(b) Benefits Review Board; establishment; mem-
bers; chairman; quorum; voting; questions re-
viewable; record; conclusiveness of findings;
stay of payments; remand
(1) There is hereby established a Benefits Re-
view Board which shall be composed of five
members appointed by the Secretary from
among individuals who are especially qualified
to serve on such Board. The Secretary shall des-
ignate one of the members of the Board to serve
as chairman. The Chairman shall have the au-
thority, as delegated by the Secretary, to exer-
cise all administrative functions necessary to
operate the Board.
(2) For the purpose of carrying out its func-
tions under this chapter, three members of the
Board shall constitute a quorum and official ac-
tion can be taken only on the affirmative vote
of at least three members.
(3) The Board shall be authorized to hear and
determine appeals raising a substantial question
of law or fact taken by any party in interest
from decisions with respect to claims of employ-
ees under this chapter and the extensions there-
of. The Board’s orders shall be based upon the
hearing record. The findings of fact in the deci-
sion under review by the Board shall be conclu-
sive if supported by substantial evidence in the
record considered as a whole. The payment of
the amounts required by an award shall not be
stayed pending final decision in any such pro-
ceeding unless ordered by the Board. No stay
shall be issued unless irreparable injury would
otherwise ensue to the employer or carrier.
(4) The Board may, on its own motion or at
the request of the Secretary, remand a case to
the administrative law judge for further appro-
priate action. The consent of the parties in in-
terest shall not be a prerequisite to a remand by
the Board.
(5) Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) through (4),
upon application of the Chairman of the Board,
the Secretary may designate up to four Depart-
ment of Labor administrative law judges to
serve on the Board temporarily, for not more
than one year. The Board is authorized to dele-
gate to panels of three members any or all of the
powers which the Board may exercise. Each such
panel shall have no more than one temporary
member. Two members shall constitute a
quorum of a panel. Official adjudicative action
may be taken only on the affirmative vote of at
least two members of a panel. Any party ag-
grieved by a decision of a panel of the Board
may, within thirty days after the date of entry
of the decision, petition the entire permanent
Board for review of the panel’s decision. Upon
affirmative vote of the majority of the perma-
nent members of the Board, the petition shall be
granted. The Board shall amend its Rules of
Practice to conform with this paragraph. Tem-
porary members, while serving as members of
the Board, shall be compensated at the same
rate of compensation as regular members.
(c) Court of appeals; jurisdiction; persons enti-
tled to review; petition; record; determina-
tion and enforcement; service of process;
stay of payments
Any person adversely affected or aggrieved by
a final order of the Board may obtain a review
of that order in the United States court of ap-
peals for the circuit in which the injury oc-
curred, by filing in such court within sixty days
following the issuance of such Board order a
written petition praying that the order be modi-
fied or set aside. A copy of such petition shall be
Page 301
TITLE 33—NAVIGATION AND NAVIGABLE WATERS
§ 921a
forthwith transmitted by the clerk of the court,
to the Board, and to the other parties, and
thereupon the Board shall file in the court the
record in the proceedings as provided in section
2112 of title 28. Upon such filing, the court shall
have jurisdiction of the proceeding and shall
have the power to give a decree affirming, modi-
fying, or setting aside, in whole or in part, the
order of the Board and enforcing same to the ex-
tent that such order is affirmed or modified. The
orders, writs, and processes of the court in such
proceedings may run, be served, and be return-
able anywhere in the United States. The pay-
ment of the amounts required by an award shall
not be stayed pending final decision in any such
proceeding unless ordered by the court. No stay
shall be issued unless irreparable injury would
otherwise ensue to the employer or carrier. The
order of the court allowing any stay shall con-
tain a specific finding, based upon evidence sub-
mitted to the court and identified by reference
thereto, that irreparable damage would result to
the employer, and specifying the nature of the
damage.
(d) District court; jurisdiction; enforcement of
orders; application of beneficiaries of awards
or deputy commissioner; process for compli-
ance with orders
If any employer or his officers or agents fails
to comply with a compensation order making an
award, that has become final, any beneficiary of
such award or the deputy commissioner making
the order, may apply for the enforcement of the
order to the Federal district court for the judi-
cial district in which the injury occurred (or to
the United States District Court for the District
of Columbia if the injury occurred in the Dis-
trict). If the court determines that the order was
made and served in accordance with law, and
that such employer or his officers or agents
have failed to comply therewith, the court shall
enforce obedience to the order by writ of injunc-
tion or by other proper process, mandatory or
otherwise, to enjoin upon such person and his of-
ficers and agents compliance with the order.
(e) Institution of proceedings for suspension, set-
ting aside, or enforcement of compensation
orders
Proceedings for suspending, setting aside, or
enforcing a compensation order, whether reject-
ing a claim or making an award, shall not be in-
stituted otherwise than as provided in this sec-
tion and section 918 of this title.
(Mar. 4, 1927, ch. 509, § 21, 44 Stat. 1436; June 25,
1936, ch. 804, 49 Stat. 1921; June 25, 1948, ch. 646,
§ 32(b), 62 Stat. 991; May 24, 1949, ch. 139, § 127, 63
Stat. 107; Pub. L. 92–576, § 15(a), (b), Oct. 27, 1972,
86 Stat. 1261, 1262; Pub. L. 95–251, § 2(a)(10), Mar.
27, 1978, 92 Stat. 183; Pub. L. 98–426, § 15, Sept. 28,
1984, 98 Stat. 1649.)
Editorial Notes
CODIFICATION
As originally enacted, subsec. (d) contained a ref-
erence to the Supreme Court of the District of Colum-
bia. Act June 25, 1936, substituted ‘‘the district court of
the United States for the District of Columbia’’ for
‘‘the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia’’, and
act June 25, 1948, as amended by act May 24, 1949, sub-
stituted ‘‘United States District Court for the District
of Columbia’’ for ‘‘district court of the United States
for the District of Columbia’’.
AMENDMENTS
1984—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 98–426, § 15(1), (2), sub-
stituted ‘‘five’’ for ‘‘three’’, and inserted ‘‘The Chair-
man shall have the authority, as delegated by the Sec-
retary, to exercise all administrative functions nec-
essary to operate the Board.’’
Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 98–426, § 15(3), substituted
‘‘three’’ for ‘‘two’’ wherever appearing.
Subsec. (b)(5). Pub. L. 98–426, § 15(4), added par. (5).
1978—Subsec. (b)(4). Pub. L. 95–251 substituted ‘‘ad-
ministrative law judge’’ for ‘‘hearing examiner’’.
1972—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 92–576, § 15(a), added subsec.
(b). Former provisions of subsec. (b) for injunction pro-
ceedings to suspend or set aside a compensation order
by a party in interest against a deputy commissioner in
Federal district court for judicial district where injury
occurred superseded by subsec. (c) of this section and
former provisions of such subsec. (b) respecting service
of process and stay of payments, except for the proce-
dural requirement of an interlocutory injunction to the
court and hearing on at least three days’ notice to the
parties in interest and the deputy commissioner, incor-
porated in subsec. (c) of this section.
Subsecs. (c) to (e). Pub. L. 92–576, § 15(a), (b), added
subsec. (c) and redesignated former subsecs. (c) and (d)
as (d) and (e), respectively.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1984 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 98–426 effective Sept. 28, 1984,
see section 28(e)(1) of Pub. L. 98–426, set out as a note
under section 901 of this title.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1972 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 92–576 effective 30 days after
Oct. 27, 1972, see section 22 of Pub. L. 92–576, set out as
a note under section 902 of this title.
REVIEW OF DECISIONS MADE BY OR PENDING BEFORE
BENEFITS REVIEW BOARD
Pub. L. 108–447, div. F, title I, Dec. 8, 2004, 118 Stat.
3121, which provided in part that no funds made avail-
able by div. F were to be used by the Solicitor of Labor
or the Secretary of Labor to review certain decisions
made by or pending before the Benefits Review Board
under the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensa-
tion Act, and deemed such decisions pending review by
the Board for more than 1 year to be affirmed by and
the final order of the Board for purposes of obtaining
review in the United States courts of appeals, was from
the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services,
and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations
Act, 2005, and was not repeated in subsequent appro-
priations acts. Similar provisions were contained in the
following prior appropriation acts:
Pub. L. 108–199, div. E, title I, Jan. 23, 2004, 118 Stat.
234.
Pub. L. 108–7, div. G, title I, Feb. 20, 2003, 117 Stat. 306.
Pub. L. 107–116, title I, Jan. 10, 2002, 115 Stat. 2184.
Pub. L. 106–554, § 1(a)(1) [title I], Dec. 21, 2000, 114 Stat.
2763, 2763A–10.
Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, § 1000(a)(4) [title I], Nov. 29,
1999, 113 Stat. 1535, 1501A–224.
Pub. L. 105–277, div. A, § 101(f) [title I], Oct. 21, 1998,
112 Stat. 2681–337, 2681–345.
Pub. L. 105–78, title I, Nov. 13, 1997, 111 Stat. 1475.
Pub. L. 104–208, div. A, title I, § 101(e) [title I], Sept.
30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–233, 3009–241.
Pub. L. 104–134, title I, § 101(d) [title I], Apr. 26, 1996,
110 Stat. 1321–211, 1321–218; renumbered title I, Pub. L.
104–140, § 1(a), May 2, 1996, 110 Stat. 1327.
§ 921a. Appearance of attorneys for Secretary,
deputy commissioner, or Board
Attorneys appointed by the Secretary shall
represent the Secretary, the deputy commis-
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Effectiveness and finality of orders** A compensation order shall become effective when filed in the office of the deputy commissioner as provided in [section 919 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title33-section919&num=0&edition=prelim), and, unless proceedings for the suspension or setting aside of such order are instituted as provided in subsection (b) of this section, shall become final at the expiration of the thirtieth day thereafter.
**(b) Benefits Review Board; establishment; members; chairman; quorum; voting; questions reviewable; record; conclusiveness of findings; stay of payments; remand**
(1) There is hereby established a Benefits Review Board which shall be composed of five members appointed by the Secretary from among individuals who are especially qualified to serve on such Board. The Secretary shall designate one of the members of the Board to serve as chairman. The Chairman shall have the authority, as delegated by the Secretary, to exercise all administrative functions necessary to operate the Board.
(2) For the purpose of carrying out its functions under this chapter, three members of the Board shall constitute a quorum and official action can be taken only on the affirmative vote of at least three members.
(3) The Board shall be authorized to hear and determine appeals raising a substantial question of law or fact taken by any party in interest from decisions with respect to claims of employees under this chapter and the extensions thereof. The Board’s orders shall be based upon the hearing record. The findings of fact in the decision under review by the Board shall be conclusive if supported by substantial evidence in the record considered as a whole. The payment of the amounts required by an awar
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 33 U.S.C. § 921
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.