Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
10 U.S.C. § 495 — Strategic delivery systems
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 500
TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES
§ 495
1 See References in Text note below.
with the implementation of the New START Treaty
for the period covered by the future-years defense
program submitted under section 221 of title 10,
United States Code, at or about the time as such de-
fense budget materials are submitted.
‘‘(3) FISCAL YEAR SPECIFIED.—A fiscal year specified
in this paragraph is each fiscal year that occurs dur-
ing the period beginning with fiscal year 2015 and
ending on the date on which the New START Treaty
is no longer in force.
‘‘(f) DEFINITIONS.—In this section:
‘‘(1) The term ‘defense budget materials’ has the
meaning given that term in section 231(f) of title 10,
United States Code [now 10 U.S.C. 231(h)].
‘‘(2) The term ‘New START Treaty’ means the
Treaty between the United States of America and the
Russian Federation on Measures for the Further Re-
duction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms,
signed on April 8, 2010, and entered into force on Feb-
ruary 5, 2011.’’
‘‘CONGRESSIONAL DEFENSE COMMITTEES’’ DEFINED
Congressional defense committees has the meaning
given that term in section 101(a)(16) of this title, see
section 3 of Pub. L. 112–81, Dec. 31, 2011, 125 Stat. 1316.
See also note under section 101 of this title.
Executive Documents
DELEGATION OF REPORTING FUNCTIONS SPECIFIED IN SEC-
TION 1045 OF THE NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION
ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012, AND CONDITION 9 OF THE
RESOLUTION OF ADVICE AND CONSENT TO RATIFICATION
OF
THE
TREATY
BETWEEN
THE
UNITED
STATES
OF
AMERICA AND THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION ON THE MEAS-
URES FOR THE FURTHER REDUCTION AND LIMITATION OF
STRATEGIC OFFENSIVE ARMS (THE ‘‘NEW START TREA-
TY’’)
Memorandum of President of the United States, Mar.
16, 2012, 77 F.R. 16649, provided:
Memorandum for
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 10 U.S.C. § 495
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: 0e99f0c1e7fe8e0d7e89dc0bef7d75d2b337c2214ef8d3f0b855c554e71890af. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-b0fbb85a2bc92a24b1efb9b8
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-10/section-495-strategic-delivery-systems--99c653a463.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 53a0dfb81af4812a1521bd86571450b2c7ec4a2905fe0fc88ebf101ab2029e6b
Source location: USCODE-2024-title10-subtitleA-partI-chap24-sec495.pdf
Stored source content
Page 500
TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES
§ 495
1 See References in Text note below.
with the implementation of the New START Treaty
for the period covered by the future-years defense
program submitted under section 221 of title 10,
United States Code, at or about the time as such de-
fense budget materials are submitted.
‘‘(3) FISCAL YEAR SPECIFIED.—A fiscal year specified
in this paragraph is each fiscal year that occurs dur-
ing the period beginning with fiscal year 2015 and
ending on the date on which the New START Treaty
is no longer in force.
‘‘(f) DEFINITIONS.—In this section:
‘‘(1) The term ‘defense budget materials’ has the
meaning given that term in section 231(f) of title 10,
United States Code [now 10 U.S.C. 231(h)].
‘‘(2) The term ‘New START Treaty’ means the
Treaty between the United States of America and the
Russian Federation on Measures for the Further Re-
duction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms,
signed on April 8, 2010, and entered into force on Feb-
ruary 5, 2011.’’
‘‘CONGRESSIONAL DEFENSE COMMITTEES’’ DEFINED
Congressional defense committees has the meaning
given that term in section 101(a)(16) of this title, see
section 3 of Pub. L. 112–81, Dec. 31, 2011, 125 Stat. 1316.
See also note under section 101 of this title.
Executive Documents
DELEGATION OF REPORTING FUNCTIONS SPECIFIED IN SEC-
TION 1045 OF THE NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION
ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012, AND CONDITION 9 OF THE
RESOLUTION OF ADVICE AND CONSENT TO RATIFICATION
OF
THE
TREATY
BETWEEN
THE
UNITED
STATES
OF
AMERICA AND THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION ON THE MEAS-
URES FOR THE FURTHER REDUCTION AND LIMITATION OF
STRATEGIC OFFENSIVE ARMS (THE ‘‘NEW START TREA-
TY’’)
Memorandum of President of the United States, Mar.
16, 2012, 77 F.R. 16649, provided:
Memorandum for the Secretary of State[,] the Sec-
retary of Defense[, and] the Secretary of Energy
By the authority vested in me as President by the
Constitution and the laws of the United States of
America, including section 301 of title 3 of the United
States Code, I hereby delegate to the Secretaries of De-
fense and Energy the reporting functions conferred
upon the President by section 1045 of the National De-
fense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public
Law 112–81) [see Codification note above], and by sec-
tion (a)(9)(B) of the Resolution of Advice and Consent
to Ratification of the New START Treaty. Subsection
(a)(9)(B)(iv) of the Resolution shall be fulfilled in co-
ordination with the Secretary of State.
The Secretary of Defense is authorized and directed
to publish this memorandum in the Federal Register.
BARACK OBAMA.
DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY UNDER SECTION 1247 OF THE
NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT
FOR FISCAL
YEAR 2016
Memorandum of President of the United States, July
26, 2016, 81 F.R. 51773, provided:
Memorandum for the Secretary of State
By the authority vested in me as President by the
Constitution and the laws of the United States of
America, including section 301 of title 3, United States
Code, I hereby order as follows:
I hereby delegate the functions and authorities vest-
ed in the President by section 1247 of the National De-
fense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public
Law 114–92) (the ‘‘Act’’) to the Secretary of State.
Any reference in this memorandum to the Act shall
be deemed to be a reference to any future act that is
the same or substantially the same as such provision.
You are authorized and directed to publish this
memorandum in the Federal Register.
BARACK OBAMA.
§ 495. Strategic delivery systems
(a)
ANNUAL
CERTIFICATION.—The
President
shall annually certify in writing to the congres-
sional defense committees whether plans to
modernize or replace strategic delivery systems
are fully funded at levels equal to or more than
the levels set forth in the November 2010 update
to the plan referred to in section 1251 of the Na-
tional Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2549), in-
cluding plans regarding—
(1) a heavy bomber and air-launched cruise
missile;
(2) an intercontinental ballistic missile;
(3) a submarine-launched ballistic missile;
(4) a ballistic missile submarine; and
(5) maintaining the nuclear command and
control system (as first reported under section
1043 of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125
Stat. 1576)).
(b) ADDITIONAL REPORT MATTERS FOLLOWING
CERTAIN CERTIFICATIONS.—If in any year prior to
the expiration of the Treaty between the United
States of America and the Russian Federation
on Measures for the Further Reduction and Lim-
itation of Strategic Offensive Arms, signed on
April 8, 2010, and entered into force on February
5, 2011 (commonly referred to as the ‘‘New
START Treaty’’), the President certifies under
subsection (a) that plans to modernize or replace
strategic delivery systems are not fully funded,
the President shall include in the next annual
report transmitted to Congress under section
492(a) 1 of this title the following:
(1) A determination of whether or not the
lack of full funding will result in a loss of
military capability when compared with the
November 2010 update to the plan referred to
in section 1251 of the National Defense Author-
ization Act for Fiscal Year 2010.
(2) If the determination under paragraph (1)
is that the lack of full funding will result in a
loss of military capability—
(A) a plan to preserve or retain the mili-
tary capability that would otherwise be lost;
or
(B) a report setting forth—
(i) an assessment of the impact of the
lack of full funding on the strategic deliv-
ery systems specified in subsection (a); and
(ii) a description of the funding required
to restore or maintain the capability.
(3) A certification by the President of wheth-
er or not the President is committed to ac-
complishing the modernization and replace-
ment of strategic delivery systems and will
meet the obligations concerning nuclear mod-
ernization as set forth in declaration 12 of the
Resolution of Advice and Consent to Ratifica-
tion of the New START Treaty.
(c) PRIOR
NOTIFICATION.—Not later than 60
days before the date on which the President car-
ries out any reduction to the number of stra-
tegic delivery systems, the President shall—
(1) make the certification under subsection
(a) for the fiscal year for which the reductions
are proposed to be carried out;
Page 501
TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES
§ 495
(2) transmit the additional report matters
under subsection (b) for such fiscal year, if
such additional report matters are so required;
and
(3) certify to the congressional defense com-
mittees whether the Russian Federation is in
compliance with its strategic arms control ob-
ligations with the United States and is not en-
gaged in activity in violation of, or incon-
sistent with, such obligations.
(d) TREATMENT OF CERTAIN REDUCTIONS.—Any
certification under subsection (a) shall not take
into account the following:
(1) Reductions made to ensure the safety, se-
curity, reliability, and credibility of the nu-
clear weapons stockpile and strategic delivery
systems, including activities related to sur-
veillance, assessment, certification, testing,
and maintenance of nuclear warheads and de-
livery systems.
(2) Strategic delivery systems that are re-
tired or awaiting dismantlement on the date
of the certification under subsection (a).
(e) DEFINITIONS.—In this section:
(1) The term ‘‘New START Treaty’’ means
the Treaty between the United States of
America and the Russian Federation on Meas-
ures for the Further Reduction and Limitation
of Strategic Offensive Arms, signed on April 8,
2010, and entered into force on February 5,
2011.
(2) The term ‘‘strategic delivery system’’
means a delivery system for nuclear weapons.
(Added Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title X, § 1035(a),
Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 1923; amended Pub. L.
112–240, title VIII, § 801(a), Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat.
2369; Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title X, § 1081(a)(6),
Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1983; Pub. L. 118–31, div.
A, title XVI, § 1632, Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 592.)
Editorial Notes
REFERENCES IN TEXT
Section 1251 of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2010, referred to in subsecs. (a) and
(b)(1), is section 1251 of Pub. L. 111–84, which is set out
as a note under section 2523 of Title 50, War and Na-
tional Defense.
Section 1043 of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2012, referred to in subsec. (a)(5), is
section 1043 of Pub. L. 112–81, Dec. 31, 2011, 125 Stat.
1576, which is not classified to the Code.
Section 492(a) of this title, referred to in subsec. (b),
relates to biennial assessments by certain military offi-
cials of delivery platforms for nuclear weapons and the
nuclear command and control system. Section 492a(a)
of this title requires the President to transmit biennial
reports to Congress on certain nuclear matters.
AMENDMENTS
2023—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 118–31, in introductory pro-
visions, substituted ‘‘prior to the expiration of the
Treaty between the United States of America and the
Russian Federation on Measures for the Further Reduc-
tion and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms,
signed on April 8, 2010, and entered into force on Feb-
ruary 5, 2011 (commonly referred to as the ‘New START
Treaty’),’’ for ‘‘before fiscal year 2020’’ and ‘‘492(a) of
this title’’ for ‘‘1043 of the National Defense Authoriza-
tion Act for Fiscal Year 2012’’.
2018—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 115–232 substituted ‘‘The’’
for ‘‘Beginning in fiscal year 2013, the’’ in introductory
provisions.
2013—Subsec. (c)(3). Pub. L. 112–240 substituted
‘‘whether the Russian Federation’’ for ‘‘that the Rus-
sian Federation’’ and inserted ‘‘strategic’’ before ‘‘arms
control obligations’’.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2013 AMENDMENT
Pub. L. 112–240, title VIII, § 801(b), Jan. 2, 2013, 126
Stat. 2369, provided that: ‘‘The amendments made by
subsection (a) [amending this section] shall take effect
as if included in the enactment of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 [Pub. L.
112–239].’’
CONGRESSIONAL NOTIFICATION OF DECISION TO DELAY
STRATEGIC DELIVERY SYSTEM TEST EVENT
Pub. L. 118–31, div. A, title XVI, § 1648, Dec. 22, 2023,
137 Stat. 600, provided that:
‘‘(a) NOTIFICATION.—Not later than five days after the
Secretary of Defense makes a decision to delay a sched-
uled test event for a strategic delivery system, the Sec-
retary shall submit to the congressional defense com-
mittees [Committees on Armed Services and Appro-
priations of the Senate and the House of Representa-
tives] written notice of such decision.
‘‘(b) REPORT.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in paragraph
(3), not later than 60 days after the submission of a
notification required under subsection (a) with re-
spect to a decision to delay a scheduled test event,
the Secretary shall submit to the congressional de-
fense committees a report on the decision.
‘‘(2)
ELEMENTS
REQUIRED.—A
report
submitted
under paragraph (1) shall include each of the fol-
lowing with respect to the scheduled test event cov-
ered by the report:
‘‘(A) A description of the objectives of the test.
‘‘(B) An explanation for the decision to cancel the
test.
‘‘(C) An estimate of expenditures related to the
cancelled test.
‘‘(D) An assessment of the effect of the test can-
cellation on—
‘‘(i) confidence in the reliability of the strategic
nuclear weapons delivery system involved; and
‘‘(ii) any research, development, test, and eval-
uation activities related to the test.
‘‘(E) A plan to reschedule the test event.
‘‘(3) EXCEPTION.—A report shall not be required
under paragraph (1) in the case of a decision to delay
a scheduled test event due to any of the following cir-
cumstances:
‘‘(A) Unfavorable weather conditions.
‘‘(B) Safety concerns.
‘‘(C) Technical issues related to the delivery sys-
tem or test facility.
‘‘(D) Operational or security concerns at the test
facility or on the test range.’’
RETENTION OF CAPABILITY TO REDEPLOY MULTIPLE
INDEPENDENTLY TARGETABLE REENTRY VEHICLES
Pub. L. 113–66, div. A, title X, § 1057, Dec. 26, 2013, 127
Stat. 864, as amended by Pub. L. 118–31, div. A, title
XVI, § 1638, Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 594, provided that:
‘‘(a) DEPLOYMENT CAPABILITY.—The Secretary of the
Air Force shall ensure that the Air Force is capable
of—
‘‘(1) deploying multiple independently targetable
reentry vehicles to Minuteman III and Sentinel inter-
continental ballistic missiles; and
‘‘(2) commencing such deployment not later than
180 days after the date on which the President deter-
mines such deployment necessary.
‘‘(b) WARHEAD
CAPABILITY.—The Nuclear Weapons
Council established by section 179 of title 10, United
States Code, shall ensure that—
‘‘(1) the nuclear weapons stockpile contains a suffi-
cient number of nuclear warheads that are capable of
Page 502
TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES
§ 496
being deployed as multiple independently targetable
reentry vehicles with respect to Minuteman III and
Sentinel intercontinental ballistic missiles; and
‘‘(2) such deployment is capable of being com-
menced not later than 180 days after the date on
which the President determines such deployment
necessary.’’
SENSES OF CONGRESS ON ENSURING THE MODERNIZATION
OF THE NUCLEAR FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES
Pub. L. 113–66, div. A, title X, § 1062(a), Dec. 26, 2013,
127 Stat. 866, provided that: ‘‘It is the policy of the
United States to—
‘‘(1) modernize or replace the triad of strategic nu-
clear delivery systems;
‘‘(2) proceed with a robust stockpile stewardship
program;
‘‘(3) maintain and modernize the nuclear weapons
production capabilities that will ensure the safety,
security, reliability, and performance of the nuclear
forces of the United States at the levels required by
the New START Treaty; and
‘‘(4) underpin deterrence by meeting the require-
ments for hedging against possible international de-
velopments or technical problems, in accordance with
the policies of the United States.’’
Executive Documents
DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY PURSUANT TO SECTION 1035
OF THE NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2013
Memorandum of President of the United States, June
29, 2015, 80 F.R. 37921, provided:
Memorandum for the Secretary of Defense
By the authority vested in me as President by the
Constitution and the laws of the United States of
America, including section 301 of title 3, United States
Code, I hereby order as follows:
I hereby delegate to the Secretary of Defense the au-
thority to fulfill the certification requirement specified
in section 1035 of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239) [probably
means section 495 of this title, as added by section 1035
of Pub. L. 112–239].
Any reference in this memorandum to section 1035 of
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2013 shall be deemed to be a reference to any future pro-
vision that is the same or substantially the same provi-
sion.
You are authorized and directed to publish this
memorandum in the Federal Register.
BARACK OBAMA.
§ 496. Consideration of expansion of nuclear
forces of other countries
(a) REPORT AND CERTIFICATION.—Not later than
60 days before the President recommends any re-
ductions to the nuclear forces of the United
States—
(1) the President shall transmit to the appro-
priate congressional committees a report de-
tailing, for each country with nuclear weap-
ons, the high-, medium-, and low- confidence
assessment of the intelligence community (as
defined in section 3(4) of the National Security
Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003(4))) with respect to—
(A) the number of each type of nuclear
weapons possessed by such country;
(B) the modernization plans for such weap-
ons of such country;
(C) the production capacity of nuclear war-
heads and strategic delivery systems (as de-
fined in section 495(e)(2) of this title) of such
country;
(D) the nuclear doctrine of such country;
and
(E) the impact of such recommended re-
ductions on the deterrence and extended de-
terrence capabilities of the United States;
and
(2) the Commander of the United States
Strategic Command shall certify to the appro-
priate congressional committees whether such
recommended reductions in the nuclear forces
of the United States will—
(A) impair the ability of the United States
to address—
(i) unplanned strategic or geopolitical
events; or
(ii) technical challenge; or
(B) degrade the deterrence or assurance
provided by the United States to friends and
allies of the United States.
(b) FORM.—The reports required by subsection
(a)(1) shall be submitted in unclassified form,
but may include a classified annex.
(c) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES
DEFINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘appropriate
congressional committees’’ means the following:
(1) The congressional defense committees.
(2) The Committee on Foreign Affairs of the
House of Representatives and the Committee
on Foreign Relations of the Senate.
(Added Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title X, § 1036(a),
Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 1924; amended Pub. L.
113–291, div. A, title X, § 1071(c)(10), Dec. 19, 2014,
128 Stat. 3509.)
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
2014—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 113–291 substituted ‘‘(50
U.S.C. 3003(4))’’ for ‘‘(50 U.S.C. 401a(4))’’ in introductory
provisions.
§ 497. Notification required for reduction, con-
solidation, or withdrawal of nuclear forces
based in Europe
(a) NOTIFICATION.—Upon any decision to re-
duce, consolidate, or withdraw the nuclear
forces of the United States that are based in Eu-
rope, the President shall transmit to the appro-
priate congressional committees a notification
containing—
(1) justification for such reduction, consoli-
dation, or withdrawal; and
(2) an assessment of how member states of
the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, in
light of such reduction, consolidation, or with-
drawal, assess the credibility of the deterrence
capability of the United States in support of
its commitments undertaken pursuant to arti-
cle 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty, signed at
Washington, District of Columbia, on April 4,
1949, and entered into force on August 24, 1949
(63 Stat. 2241; TIAS 1964).
(b) PRIOR NOTIFICATION REQUIRED.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The President shall trans-
mit the notification required by subsection (a)
by not later than 120 days before the date on
which the President commences a reduction,
consolidation, or withdrawal of the nuclear
forces of the United States that are based in
Europe described in such notification.
(2) EXCEPTION.—The limitation in paragraph
(1) shall not apply to a reduction, consolida-
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Annual Naval Vessel Construction Plan and Certification.—** The Secretary of the Navy shall include with the defense budget materials for a fiscal year each of the following:
(1) A plan for the construction of naval vessels developed in accordance with this section for each of the following classes of ships:
(A) Combatant and support vessels.
(B) Auxiliary vessels.
(2) A certification by the Secretary that both the budget for that fiscal year and the future-years defense program submitted to Congress in relation to such budget under [section 221 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title10-section221&num=0&edition=prelim) provide for funding of the construction of naval vessels at a level that is sufficient for the procurement of the vessels provided for in the plan under paragraph (1) on the schedule provided in that plan, together with the views of the Chief of Naval Operations and Commandant of the Marine Corps on the budget.
(3) The unaltered assessment of the Chief of Naval Operations and the Commandant of the Marine Corps of the plan required under paragraph (1).
**(b) Annual Naval Vessel Construction Plan.—**
(1) The annual naval vessel construction plan developed for a fiscal year for purposes of subsection (a)(1) shall be designed so that the naval vessel force provided for under that plan supports the national security strategy of the United States as set forth in the most recent national security strategy report of the President under section 108 of the National Security Act of 1947 ([50 U.S.C. 3043](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title50-section3043&num=0&edition=prelim)), except that, if at the time such plan is submitted with the defense budget materials for that fiscal y
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 231
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 10 U.S.C. § 231. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 318
TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES
[§ 230
given that term in section 101(a)(13) of title 10, United
States Code.’’
QUARTERLY
DETAILED
ACCOUNTING
FOR
OPERATIONS
CONDUCTED
AS PART
OF
THE GLOBAL WAR
ON TER-
RORISM
Pub. L. 108–375, div. A, title X, § 1041, Oct. 28, 2004, 118
Stat. 2048, which required the Secretary of Defense to
submit quarterly reports on Operation Iraqi Freedom,
Operation Enduring Freedom, Operation Noble Eagle,
and any other operation designated by the President as
being an operation of the Global War on Terrorism, was
repealed by Pub. L. 112–81, div. A, title X, § 1062(f)(2),
Dec. 31, 2011, 125 Stat. 1585.
[§ 230. Repealed. Pub. L. 107–314, div. A, title X,
§ 1041(a)(2)(A), Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2645]
Section, added Pub. L. 106–65, div. A, title X,
§ 1041(a)(1), Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 758; amended Pub. L.
106–398, § 1 [[div. A], title X, § 1075(a)], Oct. 30, 2000, 114
Stat. 1654, 1654A–280, related to inclusion in the budget
justification materials submitted to Congress of spe-
cific identification of amounts required for declas-
sification of records.
§ 231. Budgeting for construction, maintenance,
and modernization of naval vessels: annual
plans and certifications
(a) ANNUAL NAVAL VESSEL CONSTRUCTION PLAN
AND CERTIFICATION.—The Secretary of the Navy
shall include with the defense budget materials
for a fiscal year each of the following:
(1) A plan for the construction of naval ves-
sels developed in accordance with this section
for each of the following classes of ships:
(A) Combatant and support vessels.
(B) Auxiliary vessels.
(2) A certification by the Secretary that
both the budget for that fiscal year and the fu-
ture-years defense program submitted to Con-
gress in relation to such budget under section
221 of this tit
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 10 U.S.C. § 231
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 10 U.S.C. § 231. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Annual Certification.—** The President shall annually certify in writing to the congressional defense committees whether plans to modernize or replace strategic delivery systems are fully funded at levels equal to or more than the levels set forth in the November 2010 update to the plan referred to in section 1251 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2549), including plans regarding—
(1) a heavy bomber and air-launched cruise missile;
(2) an intercontinental ballistic missile;
(3) a submarine-launched ballistic missile;
(4) a ballistic missile submarine; and
(5) maintaining the nuclear command and control system (as first reported under section 1043 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1576)).
**(b) Additional Report Matters Following Certain Certifications.—** If in any year prior to the expiration of the Treaty between the United States of America and the Russian Federation on Measures for the Further Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms, signed on April 8, 2010, and entered into force on February 5, 2011 (commonly referred to as the “New START Treaty”), the President certifies under subsection (a) that plans to modernize or replace strategic delivery systems are not fully funded, the President shall include in the next annual report transmitted to Congress under section 492(a) 11 See References in Text note below. of this title the following:
(1) A determination of whether or not the lack of full funding will result in a loss of military capability when compared with the November 2010 update to the plan referred to in section 1251 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010.
(2) If the determination under par
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 495
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Reports** On a biennial basis until the date that is 10 years after March 15, 2022, the Director of National Intelligence shall submit to the congressional intelligence committees a comprehensive report on the activities, prioritization, and responsibilities of the intelligence community with respect to foreign biological threats emanating from the territory of, or sponsored by, a covered country.
**(b) Matters included** Each report under subsection (a) shall include, with respect to foreign biological threats emanating from the territory of, or sponsored by, a covered country, the following:
(1) A detailed description of all activities relating to such threats undertaken by each element of the intelligence community, and an assessment of any gaps in such activities.
(2) A detailed description of all duties and responsibilities relating to such threats explicitly authorized or otherwise assigned, exclusively or jointly, to each element of the intelligence community, and an assessment of any identified gaps in such duties or responsibilities.
(3) A description of the coordination among the relevant elements of the intelligence community with respect to the activities specified in paragraph (1) and the duties and responsibilities specified in paragraph (2).
(4) An inventory of the strategies, plans, policies, and interagency agreements of the intelligence community relating to the collection, monitoring, analysis, mitigation, and attribution of such threats, and an assessment of any identified gaps therein.
(5) A description of the coordination and interactions among the relevant elements of the intelligence community and non-intelligence community partners.
(6) An assessment of foreign malign influence efforts relating to such threats, including any foreign
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 50 U.S.C. § 3003
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 50 U.S.C. § 3003. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 559
TITLE 50—WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE
§ 3003
Stat. 495, known as the National Security Act of 1947,
which is classified principally to this chapter. For com-
plete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.
CODIFICATION
Section was formerly classified to section 401 of this
title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering
as this section.
AMENDMENTS
1958—Pub. L. 85–599 amended section generally, and,
among other changes, provided that each military de-
partment shall be separately organized, instead of sepa-
rately administered, under its own Secretary and shall
function under the direction, authority, and control of
the Secretary of Defense, and inserted provisions relat-
ing to establishment of unified or specified combatant
commands and for elimination of unnecessary duplica-
tion.
1949—Act Aug. 10, 1949, provided that the military de-
partments shall be separately administered but be
under the direction of the Secretary of Defense, and
that there shall not be a single Chief of Staff over the
armed forces nor an armed forces general staff.
§ 3003. Definitions
As used in this chapter:
(1) The term ‘‘intelligence’’ includes foreign
intelligence and counterintelligence.
(2) The term ‘‘foreign intelligence’’ means
information relating to the capabilities, inten-
tions, or activities of foreign governments or
elements thereof, foreign organizations, or for-
eign persons, or international terrorist activi-
ties.
(3) The term ‘‘counterintelligence’’ means
information gathered, and activities con-
ducted, to protect against espionage, other in-
telligence activities, sabotage, or assassina-
tions conducted by or on behalf of foreign gov-
ernments or elements thereof, foreign organi-
zations, or foreign persons, or international
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 50 U.S.C. § 3003
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 50 U.S.C. § 3003. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
### Statutory Notes
#### Codification
Section 442b, comprising section 1103 of the National Security Act of 1947, act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, was editorially reclassified as [section 3233 of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title50-section3233&num=0&edition=prelim).
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 50 U.S.C. § 401a
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 50 U.S.C. § 401a. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 69
TITLE 50—WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE
§ 401a
26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, § 205(a), 61 Stat. 501, related to
distribution of information.
A prior section 331, act Sept. 16, 1942, ch. 561, title III,
§ 301, as added Apr. 1, 1944, ch. 150, 58 Stat. 140, related
to establishment of United States War Ballot Commis-
sion and was repealed by act Apr. 19, 1946, ch. 142, 60
Stat. 96.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
ADDITIONAL REPEAL
Sections 321 to 331 were also repealed by act Aug. 10,
1956, ch. 1041, § 53, 70A Stat. 641.
§§ 332 to 340. Repealed. Apr. 19, 1946, ch. 142, 60
Stat. 96
Section 332, act Sept. 16, 1942, ch. 561, title III, § 302,
as added Apr. 1, 1944, ch. 150, 58 Stat. 140, related to per-
sons subject to this subchapter.
Section 333, act Sept. 16, 1942, ch. 561, title III, § 303,
as added Apr. 1, 1944, ch. 150, 58 Stat. 141, related to
Federal war ballots.
Section 334, act Sept. 16, 1942, ch. 561, title III, § 304,
as added Apr. 1, 1944, ch. 150, 58 Stat. 143, related to ad-
ministration of oaths.
Section 335, act Sept. 16, 1942, ch. 561, title III, § 305,
as added Apr. 1, 1944, ch. 150, 58 Stat. 143, related to ad-
ministration of this subchapter.
Section 336, act Sept. 16, 1942, ch. 561, title III, § 306,
as added Apr. 1, 1944, ch. 150, 58 Stat. 144, related to
lists of candidates.
Section 337, act Sept. 16, 1942, ch. 561, title III, § 307,
as added Apr. 1, 1944, ch. 150, 58 Stat. 144, related to dis-
tribution and collection of ballots.
Section 338, act Sept. 16, 1942, ch. 561, title III, § 308,
as added Apr. 1, 1944, ch. 150, 58 Stat. 145, related to
merchant marine ballots.
Section 339, act Sept. 16, 1942, ch. 561, title III, § 309,
as added Apr. 1, 1944, ch. 150, 58 Stat. 145, related to
transmission of ballots.
Se
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 50 U.S.C. § 401a
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 50 U.S.C. § 401a. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.