Browse Arkansas Code titles and sections
10 U.S.C. § 127 — Emergency and extraordinary expenses
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 145
TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES
§ 127
‘‘(A) Section 4025 of title 10, United States Code
(relating to prizes for advanced technology achieve-
ments).
‘‘(B) Section 217 of the National Defense Author-
ization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92;
10 U.S.C. 2222 note) (relating to science and tech-
nology activities to support business systems infor-
mation technology acquisition programs).
‘‘(C) Section 908 of the National Defense Author-
ization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 (Public Law 117–81;
10 U.S.C. 129a note) (relating to management inno-
vation activities).
‘‘(d) USE OF BEST PRACTICES.—In conducting the dem-
onstration required by subsection (a), the Secretary of
Defense shall leverage commercial best practices in
management and leading research in management and
data science.
‘‘(e) STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT DASHBOARD DEFINED.—
In this section, the term ‘strategic management dash-
board’ means a system for dynamically displaying
management metrics, performance goals, and other in-
formation necessary for Department of Defense leader-
ship to make strategic decisions related to the manage-
ment of the Department using modern, commercial
practices for data visualization and drawn from exist-
ing automated information systems available to the
Department.’’
IMPLEMENTING POLICIES, GUIDANCE, AND REPORTING
FRAMEWORK
Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title IX, § 911(b), Jan. 1, 2021,
134 Stat. 3801, provided that:
‘‘(1) SUBMITTAL TO CONGRESS.—Not later than March
1, 2022, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the
congressional defense committees [Committees on
Armed Services and Appropriations of the Senate and
the House of Representatives] a report setting forth the
policies, guidance, and reporting framework estab-
lished pursuant to subsection (c) of secti
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 10 U.S.C. § 127
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.
Original supplied file — preserved unchanged
Download original Markdown file
File SHA-256: 7bf927d7d053c3ec13c79d897b8fe31538e2e822d4fce67bc7d8bff5dc28edb7. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.
Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.
Open the recorded source website ↗
Record provenance
Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-aaf9fc1f2b7688d50373cc37
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-10/section-127-emergency-and-extraordinary-expenses--14f4376849.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 6fab7f157bd3daee124a5ecdfff7bf4f6a9bc0f1bbade461be9388244102b652
Source location: USCODE-2024-title10-subtitleA-partI-chap3-sec127.pdf
Stored source content
Page 145
TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES
§ 127
‘‘(A) Section 4025 of title 10, United States Code
(relating to prizes for advanced technology achieve-
ments).
‘‘(B) Section 217 of the National Defense Author-
ization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92;
10 U.S.C. 2222 note) (relating to science and tech-
nology activities to support business systems infor-
mation technology acquisition programs).
‘‘(C) Section 908 of the National Defense Author-
ization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 (Public Law 117–81;
10 U.S.C. 129a note) (relating to management inno-
vation activities).
‘‘(d) USE OF BEST PRACTICES.—In conducting the dem-
onstration required by subsection (a), the Secretary of
Defense shall leverage commercial best practices in
management and leading research in management and
data science.
‘‘(e) STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT DASHBOARD DEFINED.—
In this section, the term ‘strategic management dash-
board’ means a system for dynamically displaying
management metrics, performance goals, and other in-
formation necessary for Department of Defense leader-
ship to make strategic decisions related to the manage-
ment of the Department using modern, commercial
practices for data visualization and drawn from exist-
ing automated information systems available to the
Department.’’
IMPLEMENTING POLICIES, GUIDANCE, AND REPORTING
FRAMEWORK
Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title IX, § 911(b), Jan. 1, 2021,
134 Stat. 3801, provided that:
‘‘(1) SUBMITTAL TO CONGRESS.—Not later than March
1, 2022, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the
congressional defense committees [Committees on
Armed Services and Appropriations of the Senate and
the House of Representatives] a report setting forth the
policies, guidance, and reporting framework estab-
lished pursuant to subsection (c) of section 125a of title
10, United States Code (as added by subsection (a) of
this section).
‘‘(2) UPDATE.—Not later than 90 days after the date of
the submittal to Congress of the report required by sec-
tion 901(d) of this Act [10 U.S.C. 132a note], the Sec-
retary shall update the reporting framework referred to
in paragraph (1).’’
§ 126. Transfer of funds and employees
(a) When a function, power, or duty or an ac-
tivity of a department or agency of the Depart-
ment of Defense is transferred or assigned to an-
other department or agency of that department,
balances of appropriations that the Secretary of
Defense determines are available and needed to
finance or discharge that function, power, duty,
or activity, as the case may be, may, with the
approval of the President, be transferred to the
department or agency to which that function,
power, duty or activity, as the case may be, is
transferred, and used for any purpose for which
those appropriations were originally available.
Balances of appropriations so transferred shall—
(1) be credited to any applicable appropria-
tion account of the receiving department or
agency; or
(2) be credited to a new account that may be
established on the books of the Department of
the Treasury;
and be merged with the funds already credited
to that account and accounted for as one fund.
Balances of appropriations credited to an ac-
count under clause (1) are subject only to such
limitations as are specifically applicable to that
account. Balances of appropriations credited to
an account under clause (2) are subject only to
such limitations as are applicable to the appro-
priations from which they are transferred.
(b) When a function, power, or duty or an ac-
tivity of a department or agency of the Depart-
ment of Defense is transferred to another de-
partment or agency of that department, those
civilian employees of the department or agency
from which the transfer is made that the Sec-
retary of Defense determines are needed to per-
form that function, power, or duty, or for that
activity, as the case may be, may, with the ap-
proval of the President, be transferred to the de-
partment or agency to which that function,
power, duty, or activity, as the case may be, is
transferred. The authorized strength in civilian
employees of a department or agency from
which employees are transferred under this sec-
tion is reduced by the number of employees so
transferred. The authorized strength in civilian
employees of a department or agency to which
employees are transferred under this section is
increased by the number of employees so trans-
ferred.
(Added Pub. L. 87–651, title II, § 201(a), Sept. 7,
1962, 76 Stat. 516; amended Pub. L. 96–513, title V,
§ 511(2), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2920.)
HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES
Revised
section
Source (U.S. Code)
Source (Statutes at Large)
126(a) ......
126(b) ......
5:172f(a).
5:171n(a) (as applicable to
5:172f(a)).
5:172f (less (a)).
July 26, 1947, ch. 343,
§ 407; added Aug. 10,
1949, ch. 412, § 11 (21st
and 22d pars.), 63 Stat.
589.
July 26, 1947, ch. 343,
§ 308(a) (as applicable
to § 407), 61 Stat. 509.
In subsection (a), the words ‘‘under authority of law’’
are omitted as surplusage. The following substitutions
are made: ‘‘needed’’ for ‘‘necessary’’; ‘‘used’’ for ‘‘be
available for use by’’; and ‘‘those appropriations’’ for
‘‘said funds’’.
In subsection (b), 5 U.S.C. 172f(b) is restated to reflect
more clearly its purpose to authorize ‘‘transfers of per-
sonnel’’ (Senate Report No. 366, 81st Congress, p. 23).
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
1980—Subsec. (b) Pub. L. 96–513 substituted ‘‘Presi-
dent’’ for ‘‘Director of the Bureau of the Budget’’.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1980 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 96–513 effective Dec. 12, 1980,
see section 701(b)(3) of Pub. L. 96–513, set out as a note
under section 101 of this title.
Executive Documents
DELEGATION OF FUNCTIONS
Authority of President under subsec. (a) of this sec-
tion to approve transfers of balances of appropriations
provided for therein delegated to Director of Office of
Management and Budget, see section 9(2) of Ex. Ord.
No. 11609, July 22, 1971, 36 F.R. 13747, set out as a note
under section 301 of Title 3, The President.
§ 127. Emergency and extraordinary expenses
(a) Subject to the limitations of subsection (c),
and within the limitation of appropriations
made for the purpose, the Secretary of Defense,
Page 146
TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES
§ 127
the Inspector General of the Department of De-
fense, and the Secretary of a military depart-
ment within his department, may provide for
any emergency or extraordinary expense which
cannot be anticipated or classified. When it is so
provided in such an appropriation, the funds
may be spent on approval or authority of the
Secretary concerned or the Inspector General
for any purpose he determines to be proper, and
such a determination is final and conclusive
upon the accounting officers of the United
States. The Secretary concerned or the Inspec-
tor General may certify the amount of any such
expenditure authorized by him that he considers
advisable not to specify, and his certificate is
sufficient voucher for the expenditure of that
amount. The authority to expend amounts made
available for the Military Intelligence Program
for intelligence and counterintelligence objects
of a confidential, extraordinary, or emergency
nature is provided by section 429a of this title
instead of this section.
(b) The authority conferred by this section
may be delegated by the Secretary of Defense to
any person in the Department of Defense, by the
Inspector General to any person in the Office of
the Inspector General, or by the Secretary of a
military department to any person within his
department, with or without the authority to
make successive redelegations.
(c)(1) Funds may not be obligated or expended
in an amount in excess of $500,000 under the au-
thority of subsection (a) or (b) until the Sec-
retary of Defense has notified the congressional
defense committees of the intent to obligate or
expend the funds, and—
(A) in the case of an obligation or expendi-
ture in excess of $1,000,000, 15 days have
elapsed since the date of the notification; or
(B) in the case of an obligation or expendi-
ture in excess of $500,000, but not in excess of
$1,000,000, 5 days have elapsed since the date of
the notification.
(2) Subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1)
shall not apply to an obligation or expenditure
of funds otherwise covered by such subparagraph
if the Secretary of Defense determines that the
national security objectives of the United States
will be compromised by the application of the
subparagraph to the obligation or expenditure.
If the Secretary makes a determination with re-
spect to an obligation or expenditure under the
preceding sentence, the Secretary shall imme-
diately notify the committees referred to in
paragraph (1) that such obligation or expendi-
ture is necessary and provide any relevant infor-
mation (in classified form, if necessary) jointly
to the chairman and ranking minority member
(or their designees) of such committees.
(3) A notification under paragraph (1) and in-
formation referred to in paragraph (2) shall in-
clude the amount to be obligated or expended, as
the case may be, and the purpose of the obliga-
tion or expenditure.
(4)(A) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), funds
may not be obligated or expended in an amount
in excess of $100,000 under the authority of sub-
section (a) or (b) for intelligence or counter-in-
telligence activities until the Secretary of De-
fense has notified the congressional defense
committees and the congressional intelligence
committees of the intent to obligate or expend
the funds and 15 days have elapsed since the date
of the notification.
(B) The Secretary of Defense may waive sub-
paragraph (A) if the Secretary determines that
such a waiver is necessary due to extraordinary
circumstances that affect the national security
of the United States. If the Secretary issues a
waiver under this subparagraph, the Secretary
shall submit to the congressional defense and
congressional intelligence committees, by not
later than 48 hours after issuing the waiver,
written notice of and justification for the waiv-
er.
(d) ANNUAL REPORT.—(1) Not later than De-
cember 1 each year, the Secretary of Defense
shall submit—
(A) to the congressional defense committees
a report on all expenditures during the pre-
ceding fiscal year under subsections (a) and
(b); and
(B) to the congressional intelligence com-
mittees a report on expenditures relating to
intelligence and counter-intelligence during
the preceding fiscal year under subsections (a)
and (b).
(2) Each report submitted under paragraph (1)
shall include, for each individual expenditure
covered by such report in an amount in excess of
$100,000, the following:
(A) A detailed description of the purpose of
such expenditure.
(B) The amount of such expenditure.
(C) An identification of the approving au-
thority for such expenditure.
(D) A justification why other authorities
available to the Department could not be used
for such expenditure.
(E) Any other matters the Secretary con-
siders appropriate.
(e)
DEFINITION
OF
CONGRESSIONAL
INTEL-
LIGENCE COMMITTEES.—In this section, the term
‘‘congressional intelligence committees’’ means
the Permanent Select Committee on Intel-
ligence of the House of Representatives and the
Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate.
(Added Pub. L. 94–106, title VIII, § 804(a), Oct. 7,
1975, 89 Stat. 538, § 140; amended Pub. L. 98–94,
title XII, § 1268(2), Sept. 24, 1983, 97 Stat. 705; re-
numbered § 127 and amended Pub. L. 99–433, title
I, §§ 101(a)(3), 110(d)(4), Oct. 1, 1986, 100 Stat. 994,
1002; Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title III, § 361, Nov.
30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1627; Pub. L. 103–337, div. A,
title III, § 378, Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2737; Pub. L.
104–106,
div.
A,
title
IX,
§ 915,
title
XV,
§ 1502(a)(5), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 413, 502; Pub.
L. 106–65, div. A, title X, § 1067(1), Oct. 5, 1999, 113
Stat. 774; Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title X,
§ 1031(a)(2), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1596; Pub. L.
115–91, div. A, title X, §§ 1041(a)–(c), 1081(a)(4),
Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1552, 1553, 1594; Pub. L.
116–92, div. A, title X, § 1012, title XVII,
§ 1731(a)(5), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1577, 1812; Pub.
L. 118–159, div. A, title XVI, § 1614(e)(2), Dec. 23,
2024, 138 Stat. 2169.)
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
2024—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 118–159 inserted at end ‘‘The
authority to expend amounts made available for the
Page 147
TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES
§ 127a
Military Intelligence Program for intelligence and
counterintelligence objects of a confidential, extraor-
dinary, or emergency nature is provided by section 429a
of this title instead of this section.’’
2019—Subsec. (c)(1). Pub. L. 116–92, § 1731(a)(5), in-
serted ‘‘the’’ before ‘‘congressional defense commit-
tees’’.
Subsec. (d)(2). Pub. L. 116–92, § 1012, amended par. (2)
generally. Prior to amendment, par. (2) read as follows:
‘‘Each report required to be submitted under paragraph
(1) shall include a detailed explanation, by category of
activity and approving authority (the Secretary of De-
fense, the Inspector General of the Department of De-
fense, and the Secretary of a military department), of
the expenditures during the preceding fiscal year.’’
2017—Subsec. (c)(1). Pub. L. 115–91, § 1081(a)(4), sub-
stituted ‘‘congressional defense committees’’ for ‘‘the
Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on
Appropriations of the Senate and the Committee on
Armed Services and the Committee on Appropriations
of the House of Representatives’’ in introductory provi-
sions.
Subsec. (c)(4). Pub. L. 115–91, § 1041(a), added par. (4).
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 115–91, § 1041(b), designated exist-
ing provisions as par. (1), substituted ‘‘submit—’’ for
‘‘submit to the congressional defense committees a re-
port on expenditures during the preceding fiscal year
under subsections (a) and (b).’’, added subpars. (A) and
(B) of par. (1), and added par. (2).
Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 115–91, § 1041(c), added subsec. (e).
2003—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 108–136 amended subsec. (d)
generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (d) read as fol-
lows: ‘‘In any case in which funds are expended under
the authority of subsections (a) and (b), the Secretary
of Defense shall submit a report of such expenditures
on a quarterly basis to the Committee on Armed Serv-
ices and the Committee on Appropriations of the Sen-
ate and the Committee on Armed Services and the
Committee on Appropriations of the House of Rep-
resentatives.’’
1999—Subsecs. (c)(1), (d). Pub. L. 106–65 substituted
‘‘and the Committee on Armed Services’’ for ‘‘and the
Committee on National Security’’.
1996—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 104–106, § 915(2), added sub-
sec. (c). Former subsec. (c) redesignated (d).
Pub. L. 104–106, § 1502(a)(5), substituted ‘‘Committee
on Armed Services and the Committee on Appropria-
tions of the Senate and the Committee on National Se-
curity and the Committee on Appropriations of’’ for
‘‘Committees on Armed Services and Appropriations of
the Senate and’’.
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 104–106, § 915(1), redesignated sub-
sec. (c), as amended by Pub. L. 104–106, §§ 1502(a)(5), 1506,
as (d).
1994—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 103–337 struck out par. (1)
designation before ‘‘In any case’’ and struck out par. (2)
which read as follows: ‘‘The amount of funds expended
by the Inspector General of the Department of Defense
under subsections (a) and (b) during a fiscal year may
not exceed $400,000.’’
1993—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–160, § 361(1), inserted
‘‘, the Inspector General of the Department of De-
fense,’’ after ‘‘the Secretary of Defense’’ and ‘‘or the In-
spector General’’ after ‘‘the Secretary concerned’’ and
after ‘‘The Secretary concerned’’.
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 103–160, § 361(2), inserted ‘‘, by the
Inspector General to any person in the Office of the In-
spector General,’’ after ‘‘the Department of Defense’’.
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 103–160, § 361(3), designated exist-
ing provisions as par. (1) and added par. (2).
1986—Pub. L. 99–433 renumbered section 140 of this
title as this section and substituted ‘‘Emergency’’ for
‘‘Emergencies’’ in section catchline.
1983—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 98–94 struck out ‘‘of this
section’’ after ‘‘subsection (c)’’.
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 98–94 struck out ‘‘of this section’’
after ‘‘subsections (a) and (b)’’.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
CONSTRUCTION AUTHORITY OF SECRETARY OF DEFENSE
UNDER DECLARATION OF WAR OR NATIONAL EMERGENCY
Pub. L. 97–99, title IX, § 903, Dec. 23, 1981, 95 Stat. 1382,
which authorized the Secretary of Defense, in the event
of a declaration of war or the declaration of a national
emergency by the President, to undertake military
construction without regard to any other provisions of
law, was repealed and restated as section 2808 of this
title by Pub. L. 97–214, §§ 2(a), 7(18), July 12, 1982, 96
Stat. 157, 174, effective Oct. 1, 1982.
§ 127a. Operations for which funds are not pro-
vided in advance: funding mechanisms
(a) IN GENERAL.—(1) The Secretary of Defense
shall use the procedures prescribed by this sec-
tion with respect to any operation specified in
paragraph (2) that involves—
(A) the deployment (other than for a train-
ing exercise) of elements of the armed forces
for a purpose other than a purpose for which
funds have been specifically provided in ad-
vance; or
(B) the provision of humanitarian assist-
ance, disaster relief, or support for law en-
forcement (including immigration control) for
which funds have not been specifically pro-
vided in advance.
(2) This section applies to—
(A) any operation the incremental cost of
which is expected to exceed $50,000,000; and
(B) any other operation the expected incre-
mental cost of which, when added to the ex-
pected incremental costs of other operations
that are currently ongoing, is expected to re-
sult in a cumulative incremental cost of ongo-
ing operations of the Department of Defense in
excess of $100,000,000.
Any operation the incremental cost of which is
expected not to exceed $10,000,000 shall be dis-
regarded for the purposes of subparagraph (B).
(3) This section does not provide authority for
the President or the Secretary of Defense to
carry out any operation, but establishes mecha-
nisms for the Department of Defense by which
funds are provided for operations that the armed
forces are required to carry out under some
other authority.
(b) WAIVER
OF REQUIREMENT TO REIMBURSE
SUPPORT UNITS.—(1) The Secretary of Defense
shall direct that, when a unit of the armed
forces participating in an operation described in
subsection (a) receives services from an element
of the Department of Defense that operates
through the Defense Business Operations Fund
(or a successor fund), such unit of the armed
forces may not be required to reimburse that
element for the incremental costs incurred by
that element in providing such services, not-
withstanding any other provision of law or any
Government accounting practice.
(2) The amounts which but for paragraph (1)
would be required to be reimbursed to an ele-
ment of the Department of Defense (or a fund)
shall be recorded as an expense attributable to
the operation and shall be accounted for sepa-
rately.
(c) TRANSFER AUTHORITY.—(1) Whenever there
is an operation of the Department of Defense de-
scribed in subsection (a), the Secretary of De-
Cross-references
Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a)** Subject to the limitations of subsection (c), and within the limitation of appropriations made for the purpose, the Secretary of Defense, the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, and the Secretary of a military department within his department, may provide for any emergency or extraordinary expense which cannot be anticipated or classified. When it is so provided in such an appropriation, the funds may be spent on approval or authority of the Secretary concerned or the Inspector General for any purpose he determines to be proper, and such a determination is final and conclusive upon the accounting officers of the United States. The Secretary concerned or the Inspector General may certify the amount of any such expenditure authorized by him that he considers advisable not to specify, and his certificate is sufficient voucher for the expenditure of that amount. The authority to expend amounts made available for the Military Intelligence Program for intelligence and counterintelligence objects of a confidential, extraordinary, or emergency nature is provided by [section 429a of this title](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title10-section429a&num=0&edition=prelim) instead of this section.
**(b)** The authority conferred by this section may be delegated by the Secretary of Defense to any person in the Department of Defense, by the Inspector General to any person in the Office of the Inspector General, or by the Secretary of a military department to any person within his department, with or without the authority to make successive redelegations.
**(c)**
(1) Funds may not be obligated or expended in an amount in excess of $500,000 under the authority of subsection (a) or (b) until the Secretary of Defense has notified the cong
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 127
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Policies and Procedures.—** The Secretary of Defense shall establish policies and procedures for determining the most appropriate and cost efficient mix of military, civilian, and contractor personnel to perform the mission of the Department of Defense.
**(b) Risk Mitigation Over Cost.—** In establishing the policies and procedures under subsection (a), the Secretary shall clearly provide that attainment of a Department of Defense workforce sufficiently sized and comprised of the appropriate mix of personnel necessary to carry out the mission of the Department and the core mission areas of the armed forces takes precedence over cost. The Secretary may not reduce the civilian workforce programmed full-time equivalent levels, or conduct any reductions or realignments that occur outside the normal programming process (including ad hoc, immediate, or unprogrammed changes) of 50 employees or more implemented before or after the submission of the annual budget request, unless the Secretary conducts an appropriate analysis of the impacts of such reductions on workload, military force structure, lethality, readiness, operational effectiveness, stress on the military force, and fully burdened costs.
**(c) Delegation of Responsibilities.—** The Secretary shall delegate responsibility for implementation of the policies and procedures established under subsection (a) as follows:
(1) The Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness shall have overall responsibility for guidance to implement such policies and procedures.
(2) The Secretaries of the military departments and the heads of the Defense Agencies shall have overall responsibility for the requirements determination, planning, programming, and budgeting for such policies and procedures. The Secretary of Def
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 129a
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 10 U.S.C. § 129a. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 158
TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES
§ 129a
Stat. 2658, 2735; Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title XI,
§ 1101, Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1922; Pub. L. 106–65,
div. A, title X, § 1067(1), Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 774;
Pub. L. 112–81, div. A, title IX, § 932, Dec. 31, 2011,
125 Stat. 1543; Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title XI,
§ 1101(a), (b)(1), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2443; Pub.
L. 116–92, div. A, title XI, § 1103, Dec. 20, 2019, 133
Stat. 1596; Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title XI, § 1102,
Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 1949.)
Editorial Notes
AMENDMENTS
2021—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 117–81, in first sentence,
substituted ‘‘solely’’ for ‘‘primarily’’ and, in second
sentence, struck out ‘‘solely’’ after ‘‘shall not be sub-
ject’’.
2019—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 116–92, § 1103(1), in first sen-
tence, substituted ‘‘each fiscal year primarily’’ for
‘‘each fiscal year’’, and in second sentence, substituted
‘‘The management of such personnel in any fiscal year
shall not be subject solely to any’’ for ‘‘Any’’ and
struck out ‘‘shall be developed on the basis of those fac-
tors and shall be subject to adjustment solely for rea-
sons of changed circumstances’’ after ‘‘number of em-
ployees’’.
Subsec. (c)(2)(A). Pub. L. 116–92, § 1103(2)(A), inserted
‘‘and associated cost’’ after ‘‘projected size’’.
Subsec. (c)(2)(B). Pub. L. 116–92, § 1103(2), inserted
‘‘and associated cost’’ after ‘‘projected size’’ in two
places and substituted ‘‘to reduce the overall costs of
the total force of military, civilian, and contract
workforces.’’ for ‘‘that have been taken to identify off-
setting reductions and avoid unnecessary overall
growth in the size of the civilian workforce.’’
2016—Pub. L. 114–328, § 1101(b)(1), amended section
catchline generally, substituting ‘‘Civilian personnel
management’’ for
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 10 U.S.C. § 129a
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 10 U.S.C. § 129a. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Establishment.—**
(1) There is a Performance Improvement Officer of the Department of Defense, to be appointed by the Secretary of Defense from among the ranks of qualified individuals from the senior career civil service.
(2) The Performance Improvement Officer shall be appointed from among persons described in paragraph (1) who have an extensive management or business background and experience with managing large or complex organizations, organizational change management, or business transformation activities.
**(b) Deputy.—** The Performance Improvement Officer shall be supported by a Deputy who shall be appointed by the Secretary of Defense from among the ranks of qualified individuals from the senior career civil service. The Deputy shall be the first assistant to the Performance Improvement Officer and shall assist that Officer in the performance of the duties of that position and shall act for, and exercise the powers of, the Officer when that Officer dies, resigns, or is otherwise unable to perform the functions and duties of the office.
**(c) Duties and Responsibilities.—** Subject to the authority, direction, and control of the Secretary of Defense and the Deputy Secretary of Defense, the Performance Improvement Officer shall perform such duties, exercise such powers, and have such responsibilities as the Secretary or the Deputy Secretary may prescribe, including the following:
(1) Responsibility for updating and implementing the Strategic Management Plan of the Department of Defense required by section 904(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. note prec. 2201).
(2) Responsibility for chairing the Defense Performance Improvement Council (or any successor organization).
(3) Responsibility f
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 132a
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 10 U.S.C. § 132a. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 185
TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES
§ 132a
1 So in original. Probably should be capitalized as ‘‘Perform-
ance Improvement Officer’’.
2 So in original. Probably should be ‘‘for’’.
§ 132a. Performance improvement officer 1
(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—
(1) There is a Performance Improvement Of-
ficer of the Department of Defense, to be ap-
pointed by the Secretary of Defense from
among the ranks of qualified individuals from
the senior career civil service.
(2) The Performance Improvement Officer
shall be appointed from among persons de-
scribed in paragraph (1) who have an extensive
management or business background and expe-
rience with managing large or complex organi-
zations, organizational change management,
or business transformation activities.
(b) DEPUTY.—The Performance Improvement
Officer shall be supported by a Deputy who shall
be appointed by the Secretary of Defense from
among the ranks of qualified individuals from
the senior career civil service. The Deputy shall
be the first assistant to the Performance Im-
provement Officer and shall assist that Officer
in the performance of the duties of that position
and shall act for, and exercise the powers of, the
Officer when that Officer dies, resigns, or is oth-
erwise unable to perform the functions and du-
ties of the office.
(c) DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES.—Subject to
the authority, direction, and control of the Sec-
retary of Defense and the Deputy Secretary of
Defense, the Performance Improvement Officer
shall perform such duties, exercise such powers,
and have such responsibilities as the Secretary
or the Deputy Secretary may prescribe, includ-
ing the following:
(1) Responsibility for updating and imple-
menting the Strategic Management Plan of
the Department of Defense required by section
904
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 10 U.S.C. § 132a
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 10 U.S.C. § 132a. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
**(a) Defense Business Processes Generally.—** The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that defense business processes are reviewed, and as appropriate revised, through business process reengineering to match best commercial practices, to the maximum extent practicable, so as to minimize customization of commercial business systems.
**(b) Defense Business Systems Generally.—** The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that each covered defense business system developed, deployed, and operated by the Department of Defense—
(1) supports efficient business processes that have been reviewed, and as appropriate revised, through business process reengineering;
(2) is integrated into a comprehensive defense business enterprise architecture;
(3) is managed in a manner that provides visibility into, and traceability of, expenditures for the system; and
(4) uses an acquisition and sustainment strategy that prioritizes the use of commercial software and business practices.
**(c) Issuance of Guidance.—**
(1) **Secretary of defense guidance.—** — The Secretary shall issue guidance to provide for the coordination of, and decision making for, the planning, programming, and control of investments in covered defense business systems.
(2) **Supporting guidance.—** — The Secretary shall direct the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, and the Chief Information Officer of each of the military departments to issue and maintain supporting guidance, as appropriate and within their respective areas of responsibility, for the guidance of the Secretary issued under paragraph (1).
**(d) Guidance Elements.—** The guidance issued under subsection (c) shall include the following elements:
(1) Policy to ensure that
Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 10 U.S.C. § 2222
Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. The source passage cites 10 U.S.C. § 2222. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.
Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities
Page 1762
TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES
[§ 2221
days after the date on which such final regulations
are published.’’
PILOT
PROGRAMS
FOR
TESTING
PROGRAM
MANAGER
PERFORMANCE
OF PRODUCT SUPPORT OVERSIGHT RE-
SPONSIBILITIES FOR LIFE CYCLE OF ACQUISITION PRO-
GRAMS
Pub. L. 105–261, div. A, title VIII, § 816, Oct. 17, 1998,
112 Stat. 2088, authorized the Secretary of Defense to
designate 10 acquisition programs of the military de-
partments as pilot programs on program manager re-
sponsibility for product support and required report to
Congress by Feb. 1, 1999.
ENHANCED SYSTEM OF PERFORMANCE INCENTIVES
Pub. L. 103–355, title V, § 5001(b), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat.
3350, provided that, within one year after Oct. 13, 1994,
the Secretary of Defense should review the incentives
and personnel actions available for encouraging excel-
lence in the management of defense acquisition pro-
grams and provide an enhanced system of incentives,
including pay for performance, to facilitate the
achievement of goals approved or defined pursuant to
subsec. (a) of this section.
RECOMMENDED LEGISLATION
Pub. L. 103–355, title V, § 5001(c), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat.
3350, directed the Secretary of Defense, not later than
one year after Oct 13, 1994, to submit to Congress any
recommended legislation that the Secretary considered
necessary to carry out this section and otherwise to fa-
cilitate and enhance management of Department of De-
fense acquisition programs on the basis of performance.
[§ 2221. Repealed. Pub. L. 105–261, div. A, title IX,
§ 906(f)(1), Oct. 17, 1998, 112 Stat. 2096]
Section, added Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title IX,
§ 914(a)(1), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 412; amended Pub. L.
104–201, div. A, title X, § 1008(a), Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat.
2633; Pub. L. 105–85, div.
Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 10 U.S.C. § 2222
Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. The source passage cites 10 U.S.C. § 2222. This identifies an authority to review, not proof of applicability.