Arkansas Legal Resource Navigator

28 U.S.C. § 92 — Idaho

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

28 U.S.C. § 92 — Idaho

Page 33 TITLE 28—JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE § 93 pending in any court of the Territory of Hawaii or in the United States District Court for the District of Ha- waii shall abate by reason of the admission of said State into the Union, but the same shall be transferred to and proceeded with in such appropriate State courts as shall be established under the constitution of said State, or shall continue in the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii, as the nature of the case may require. And no writ, action, indictment, cause or proceeding shall abate by reason of any change in the courts, but shall be proceeded with in the State or United States courts according to the laws thereof, respectively. And the appropriate State courts shall be the successors of the courts of the Territory as to all cases arising within the limits embraced within the ju- risdiction of such courts, respectively, with full power to proceed with the same, and award mesne or final process therein, and all the files, records, indictments, and proceedings relating to any such writ, action, in- dictment, cause or proceeding shall be transferred to such appropriate State courts and the same shall be proceeded with therein in due course of law. ‘‘All civil causes of action and all criminal offenses which shall have arisen or been committed prior to the admission of said State, but as to which no writ, ac- tion, indictment or proceeding shall be pending at the date of such admission, shall be subject to prosecution in the appropriate State courts or in the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii in like man- ner, to the same extent, and with like right of appellate review, as if said State had been created and said State courts had been estab

Source: Supplied 2024 U.S. Code historical extraction · 28 U.S.C. § 92

Stored review status: historical_2024_not_currentness_verified. A text match is a research starting point; applicability is not established.

Original supplied file — preserved unchanged

Download original Markdown file

File SHA-256: b538ba56811fdae912b72a8073ea49ccee7b02ae02d5dc27faec45bc7a9a48b0. The original may include catalog metadata, neighboring provisions, or embedded records outside this collection's scope. Search shows only the selected federal record. Historical editions and unverified snapshots are not a statement of current law.

Authority boundary: historical or unconfirmed source not current law verified.

Open the recorded source website ↗

Record provenance

Stable record: federal_law:legal_authorities:usc2024-a999208acfaadbd78fbdaa96
Source file: Laws/federal/codes/united-states-code-2024/title-28/section-92-idaho--a850c8f191.md
Pages: Not recorded – Not recorded
Passage SHA-256: 7708760f58523967e45032749f6e85a7bd9d4ff558860eace7c346aaccb18a7f

Source location: USCODE-2024-title28-partI-chap5-sec92.pdf

Stored source content

Page 33 TITLE 28—JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE § 93 pending in any court of the Territory of Hawaii or in the United States District Court for the District of Ha- waii shall abate by reason of the admission of said State into the Union, but the same shall be transferred to and proceeded with in such appropriate State courts as shall be established under the constitution of said State, or shall continue in the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii, as the nature of the case may require. And no writ, action, indictment, cause or proceeding shall abate by reason of any change in the courts, but shall be proceeded with in the State or United States courts according to the laws thereof, respectively. And the appropriate State courts shall be the successors of the courts of the Territory as to all cases arising within the limits embraced within the ju- risdiction of such courts, respectively, with full power to proceed with the same, and award mesne or final process therein, and all the files, records, indictments, and proceedings relating to any such writ, action, in- dictment, cause or proceeding shall be transferred to such appropriate State courts and the same shall be proceeded with therein in due course of law. ‘‘All civil causes of action and all criminal offenses which shall have arisen or been committed prior to the admission of said State, but as to which no writ, ac- tion, indictment or proceeding shall be pending at the date of such admission, shall be subject to prosecution in the appropriate State courts or in the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii in like man- ner, to the same extent, and with like right of appellate review, as if said State had been created and said State courts had been established prior to the accrual of such causes of action or the commission of such offenses. The admission of said State shall effect no change in the substantive or criminal law governing such causes of action and criminal offenses which shall have arisen or been committed; and such of said criminal offenses as shall have been committed against the laws of the Territory shall be tried and punished by the appro- priate courts of said State, and such as shall have been committed against the laws of the United States shall be tried and punished in the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii.’’ APPEALS Pub. L. 86–3, § 13, Mar. 18, 1959, 73 Stat. 10, provided that: ‘‘Parties shall have the same rights of appeal from and appellate review of final decisions of the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii or the Supreme Court of the Territory of Hawaii in any case finally decided prior to admission of said State into the Union, whether or not an appeal therefrom shall have been perfected prior to such admission, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Cir- cuit and the Supreme Court of the United States shall have the same jurisdiction therein, as by law provided prior to admission of said State into the Union, and any mandate issued subsequent to the admission of said State shall be to the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii or a court of the State, as may be appropriate. Parties shall have the same rights of appeal from and appellate review of all orders, judg- ments, and decrees of the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii and of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawaii as successor to the Supreme Court of the Territory of Hawaii, in any case pending at the time of admission of said State into the Union, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and the Supreme Court of the United States shall have the same jurisdiction therein, as by law provided in any case arising subsequent to the admission of said State into the Union.’’ EXTENSION OF JURISDICTION OF UNITED STATES DIS- TRICT COURT FOR DISTRICT OF HAWAII AND OF CIVIL AND CRIMINAL LAWS TO MIDWAY, WAKE, JOHNSON, SAND, ETC., ISLANDS The jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii and the laws of the United States relating to civil acts or offenses consummated or committed on the high seas on board a vessel belong- ing to the United States were extended to the Midway Islands, Wake, Johnson, Sand, etc., Islands by section 644a of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions. Executive Documents ADMISSION OF HAWAII AS STATE Admission of Hawaii into the Union was accom- plished Aug. 21, 1959, on issuance of Proc. No. 3309, Aug. 21, 1959, 25 F.R. 6868, 73 Stat. c74, as required by sections 1 and 7(c) of Pub. L. 86–3, Mar. 18, 1959, 73 Stat. 4, set out as notes preceding section 491 of Title 48, Terri- tories and Insular Possessions. § 92. Idaho Idaho, exclusive of Yellowstone National Park, constitutes one judicial district. Court shall be held at Boise, Coeur d’Alene, Moscow, and Pocatello. (June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 877; Pub. L. 91–272, § 5, June 2, 1970, 84 Stat. 297.) HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., § 151 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, § 78, 36 Stat. 1109; May 11, 1939, ch. 121, 53 Stat. 738). All of Yellowstone National Park is included in the judicial district of Wyoming by section 131 of this title. Those parts of the park lying in Idaho are accordingly excluded from the judicial district of Idaho. A provision as to the places for maintenance of the clerk’s offices, and requiring that they be open at all times, was omitted as covered by sections 452–751 of this title. Changes in arrangement and phraseology were made. Editorial Notes AMENDMENTS 1970—Pub. L. 91–272 struck out provisions which had divided the judicial district of Idaho into a Northern Division, a Central Division, a Southern Division, and an Eastern Division. § 93. Illinois Illinois is divided into three judicial districts to be known as the Northern, Central, and Southern Districts of Illinois. Northern District (a) The Northern District comprises two divi- sions. (1) The Eastern Division comprises the coun- ties of Cook, Du Page, Grundy, Kane, Kendall, Lake, La Salle, and Will. Court for the Eastern Division shall be held at Chicago and Wheaton. (2) The Western Division comprises the counties of Boone, Carroll, De Kalb, Jo Daviess, Lee, McHenry, Ogle, Stephen- son, Whiteside, and Winnebago. Court for the Western Division shall be held at Freeport and Rockford. Central District (b) The Central District comprises the coun- ties of Adams, Brown, Bureau, Cass, Champaign, Christian, Coles, De Witt, Douglas, Edgar, Ford, Fulton, Greene, Hancock, Henderson, Henry, Iroquois,

Cross-references

Connections may be documented source relationships, shared citations or nearby passages. Each explains its basis; a connection alone does not establish applicability to your situation.

Federal law — U.S. Code and appendices · legal_authorities

28 U.S.C. § 92 — Idaho

Idaho, exclusive of Yellowstone National Park, constitutes one judicial district.

Source: Supplied U.S. Code snapshot — release unconfirmed · 28 U.S.C. § 92

Stored review status: release_metadata_unconfirmed. Same stored citation; legal effect and authority still require review.